Skip to main content
Download PDF

Factors associated with polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems among older community-dwelling adults in European countries: a longitudinal study

BMC Geriatrics volume 22, Article number: 841 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Polypharmacy can be defined as using five or more medications simultaneously. “Medication-related problems”, an extension of polypharmacy, includes inappropriate prescribing, poor adherence, overdosage, underdosage, inappropriate drug selection, inadequate monitoring, adverse drug effects, and drug interactions. Polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems among older people are associated with adverse health consequences due to drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, and adverse drug effects. This study aims to assess the factors associated with polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems among community-dwelling older people in the Netherlands, Greece, Croatia, Spain, United Kingdom.

Method

This longitudinal study used baseline and follow-up data from 1791 participants of the Urban Health Center European project. Polypharmacy and the risk of medication-related problems were evaluated at baseline and follow-up using the Medication Risk Questionnaire. We studied factors in the domains (a) sociodemographic characteristics, (b) lifestyle and nutrition, and (c) health and health care use. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used to examine the factors associated with polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems.

Results

Mean age was 79.6 years (SD ± 5.6 years); 60.8% were women; 45.2% had polypharmacy, and 41.8% had a high risk of medication-related problems. Women participants had lower odds of polypharmacy (OR = 0.55;95%CI:0.42–0.72) and a high risk of medication-related problems (OR = 0.50; 95%CI:0.39–0.65). Participants with a migration background (OR = 1.67;95%CI:1.08–2.59), overweight (OR = 1.37; 95%CI:1.04–1.79) and obesity (OR = 1.78;95%CI:1.26–2.51) compared to ‘normal weight’, with lower physical HRQoL (OR = 0.96, 95%CI:0.95–0.98), multi-morbidity (OR = 3.73, 95%CI:2.18–6.37), frailty (OR = 1.69, 95%CI:1.24–2.30), visited outpatient services (OR = 1.77, 95%CI: 1.09–2.88) had higher odds of polypharmacy. The associations with the high risk of medication-related problems were similar.

Conclusions

Multiple factors in demography, lifestyle, nutrition, and health care use are associated with polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems. Polypharmacy is a single element that may reflect the number of medications taken. The broader content of medication-related problems should be considered to assess the context of medication use among older people comprehensively. These provide starting points to improve interventions to reduce polypharmacy and high risk of medication-related problems. In the meantime, health professionals can apply these insights to identify subgroups of patients at a high risk of polypharmacy and medication-related problems.

Trial registration

The intervention of the UHCE project was registered in the ISRCTN registry as ISRCTN52788952. The date of registration is 13/03/2017.

Peer Review reports

Background

People worldwide are living longer nowadays, but generally not in full health [1]. Living longer might result in people experiencing a period of life characterized by multi-morbidity [2]. Along with the multi-morbidity, the increasing number of medications used and the potentially inappropriate medication use among older adults have become a major health care concern [3].

Polypharmacy can be defined as using five or more medications simultaneously [4]. Medication-related problems, an extension of polypharmacy, can be defined as events or situations involving drug therapy that actually or potentially interferes with desired health outcomes [5]. It includes inappropriate prescribing, poor adherence, overdosage, underdosage, inappropriate drug selection, inadequate monitoring, adverse drug effects, and drug interactions [6, 7]. Hoel et al. [8] stated that, in general, using a higher number of medications is associated with the risk of more adverse drug events (ADEs), non-adherence, and costs. They suggested that patients taking five medications generally have a significant drug problem [8]. Polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems among older persons are associated with increased health care costs, hospital admissions, and adverse health consequences, including falls, cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life [4, 9, 10]. Large-scale studies have estimated that 50.1 per 1000 person-years in ambulatory older adults and 1.89 per 100 person-months in institutionalized older community-dwelling adults have experienced adverse medication events [11, 12]. However, half of the observed adverse drug events could be prevented [11, 12]. Therefore, uncovering the associated factors related to polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems becomes an essential step before taking action to prevent medication-related adverse events.

Studies have assessed which factors are associated with a higher risk of polypharmacy [13,14,15,16,17,18]. People with polypharmacy are generally older [13] and have a lower educational level than people without polypharmacy [14]. Former smokers have a higher risk of polypharmacy than persons who did not smoke [15]. Factors regarding health and health care use (e.g. falling, frailty, hospital admission, outpatient services use) have also been reported to be associated with a higher risk of polypharmacy [16, 17]. However, relatively few studies evaluated how a comprehensive set of relevant factors (i.e. sociodemographic, lifestyle and nutrition, as well as health and health care use) is associated with polypharmacy; also, relatively few studies assess the factors associated with the high risk of medication-related problems [18, 19]. Hence, our study assesses which factors in the domains of (a) sociodemographic characteristics, (b) lifestyle and nutrition, and (c) health and health care are associated with polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems among community-dwelling older people in Europe. Moreover, this study aims to observe whether the associated factors regarding polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems are similar and show a new insight to health care practitioners on preventing medication-related adverse events.

Methods

Study setting and population

This study was performed within the framework of the Urban Health Centres Europe (UHCE) project. The project was conducted in five countries (the Netherlands, Greece, Croatia, Spain, United Kingdom) between May 2015 and June 2017 [20]. The project aimed to prompt healthy ageing by approaches including a preventive multidimensional health assessment and integrated care pathways on appropriate medication prescription and adherence, prevention of fall risk, loneliness and frailty [21]. A total of 2325 participants who lived independently and could participate in the study for at least 6 months were recruited; 1215 were assigned to the integrated care pathway intervention; 1110 were assigned to the control group, which applied the “care as usual” [21]. All cities have followed ethical committee procedures, and approvals have been provided. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was registered as ISRCTN52788952. Further details on the interventions were described elsewhere [21, 22].

In the current study, we adopted a longitudinal design and used baseline data and data after a 12-month follow-up of the UHCE project. Data was collected by self-reported questionnaires at both time points. In 2325 participants, participants who dropped out at follow-up (n = 482) were first excluded. Then, participants with missing data on polypharmacy (n = 24), the risk of medication-related problems (n = 27), and age and gender (n = 1) were further excluded. Thus, 1791 participants were included in this study. Due to the missing data on covariates, 340 participants were excluded from the main analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The flowchart of study population

Full size image

Measurements

Outcomes

Polypharmacy and the risk of medication-related problems were evaluated at baseline and follow-up using the Medication Risk Questionnaire (MRQ) [7]. MRQ is a 10-item validated self-administered tool that can identify participants at a higher risk of medication-related problems, notably in the older population [7]. It covers polypharmacy, inappropriate prescribing, poor adherence, and multiple medical problems. Polypharmacy was measured by the question: Do you currently take five or more different medicines? [23] As shown in Supplementary Table S1, eight items of the MRQ were used to calculate the risk of experiencing medication-related problems. The 8-item MRQ was suggested by the original study of the questionnaire [7] and supported by a validation study [24]. The sum of item scores in the 8-item MRQ was used to indicate the risk level of experiencing medication-related problems. A risk score of 0 (lowest risk) to 8 (highest risk) indicates the level of risk [7]. Following the validating study on MRQ [24], participants were classified as a low-risk group if the total score is lower than 4 and a high-risk group if the score is equal to or larger than 4.

Associated factors

Based on the literature [13,14,15,16,17], variables assessed at baseline from three domains were considered as associated factors: sociodemographic factors, factors regarding lifestyle and nutrition, factors regarding health and health care use.

Sociodemographic factors

Sociodemographic factors included age (in years), sex (women/men), education level, country of residence (the Netherlands/ Greece/ Croatia/ Spain/ the UK), migration background (yes/no), and household composition (living with others/living alone). The level of education was reported as the highest level of education attained by a participant. It was classified into three categories according to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED): primary or less (ISCED 0–1), secondary or equivalent (ISCED 2–5), and tertiary or higher (ISCED 6–8) [25]. A participant was reported as having a migration background when the country of residence was not the country of birth.

Factors regarding lifestyle and nutrition

Factors regarding lifestyle and nutrition included smoking (yes/no), alcohol use (yes/no), physical activity, malnutrition (yes/no) and body mass index (BMI). One single question (i.e. Do you smoke at present?) was used to assess whether a person was a current smoker (yes/no) [20]. Alcohol use was assessed by three items of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C), with a score from 0 (lowest risk) to 12 (highest risk), indicating the level of risk [26]. The variable was dichotomized (≥ 3 in women and ≥ 4 in men) to indicate whether a person was a hazardous drinker or had active alcohol use disorder (yes/no) [26]. The frequency of physical activity was assessed through answers to a question from the Frailty Instrument of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE-FI). The SHARE-FI was developed based on the existing questionnaire from SHARE [27]. Participants were asked to indicate the frequency of activities requiring a low or medium energy levels, such as gardening, cleaning the car or going for a walk. Answer categories included ‘once a week or less’ and ‘more than once a week’ [28]. Malnutrition was measured with the Short Nutrition Assessment Questionnaire 65 + (SNAQ-65 +) [29], which included the index of unintentional weight loss, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and appetite and functional status. If a person lost 6 kg (13lbs) or more during the last 6 months, or 3 kg (6½ lbs) or more during the last month, or has a MUAC < 25 cm, he/she was classified as malnutrition. If a person had a poor appetite last week and difficulties climbing a staircase, he/she was classified as at risk of malnutrition [29]. BMI was calculated using self-reported height and weight (kg/m2). Participants were classified as underweight /normal weight (< 24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2) and obese (≥ 30 kg/m2), following WHO guidelines [28].

Factors regarding health and health care use

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), multi-morbidity (yes/no), number of falls during the last year, frailty (yes/no), use of outpatient service (yes/no) and hospitalization (yes/no) during the last year were grouped in the factors regarding health and health care use. HRQoL was measured by the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) [30]. The SF-12 includes 12 items encompassing eight health domains compiled in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS), both ranging from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest health status) [31]. Multi-morbidity was defined as having two or more common chronic conditions. A list of 15 common chronic conditions was used to identify older patients with multi-morbidity [20, 32]. Patients were asked to indicate whether they have conditions: heart attack (myocardial infarction or coronary thrombosis or any other heart problem including congestive heart failure), high blood pressure or hypertension, high blood cholesterol, a stroke or cerebral vascular disease, diabetes or high blood sugar, chronic lung disease, asthma, arthritis, osteoporosis, cancer or malignant tumor, stomach or duodenal ulcer or peptic ulcer, Parkinson’s disease, cataract, hip fracture or femoral fracture, and other conditions which are not yet mentioned. Participants reported the number of falls during the past 12 months. The falling number was dichotomized into “none or once” and “twice or more”. Frailty was assessed with the Tilburg Frailty + Indicator (TFI), a validated questionnaire which contains 15 self-reported questions [33]. The overall frailty score is the sum of the 15 items (score range 0–15) in the questionnaire. Participants with a total score ≥ 5 were classified as frail [34]. Outpatient services use (yes/no) was assessed by whether the participant visited a general practitioner or specialist during the last 12 months. Hospitalization (yes/no) was assessed by whether the participant had been admitted to the hospital during the last 12 months.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of the study population. Means and standard deviation (SD) were used to summarize the continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Characteristics of the participants were compared according to polypharmacy and the risk of medication-related problems by T-test for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables.

Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used to estimate longitudinal associations between the factors and polypharmacy or the high risk of medication-related problems. This approach is used to observe the effects of added variables and the change of effects on the risk of polypharmacy and the “risk of medication-related problems” at each step. Four separate analyses were done. In model 1, all sociodemographic factors at baseline were entered; in model 2, factors regarding lifestyle and nutrition at baseline were additionally added; in model 3, factors regarding health and health care use at baseline were additionally added; in model 4, polypharmacy (yes/no) or the variable “risk of medication-related problems” at baseline was further added to see the impact of the change in the outcomes. Whether the participants were divided into an intervention group or not (yes/no) was included as a covariate in all models. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated for each factor. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The multi-collinearity test was performed to determine the correlation between the independent variables using a variance inflation factor (VIF). Collinearity exists when a VIF value is greater than 10 [35]. All analyses were conducted in the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25 Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp.

Non-response analysis

The response group was defined as participants with full information (n = 1451). The non-response group was defined as participants with missing values (n = 874).

Results

Table 1 presents the characteristics of the study population at baseline. The mean age was 79.6 years (SD ± 5.6 years), and 60.8% were women. Of all participants, 45.2% had polypharmacy, and 41.8% were classified as having a high risk of medication-related problems.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study sample (n = 1791) by polypharmacy (no /yes) and the risk of medication-related problems (low risk /high risk) measured at follow-up
Full size table

Polypharmacy was more frequently seen among older participants (P < 0.001) and participants living alone (P = 0.004). Women had a lower probability of high risk of medication-related problems than men (P = 0.001). Participants with a migration background had a higher probability of polypharmacy (P = 0.045) and high risk of medication-related problems (P = 0.03) than participants without a migration background. In general, the UK had the lowest probability of polypharmacy and high risk of medication-related problems, while Greece had the highest probability (P < 0.001). Participants with polypharmacy (P < 0.001) or with a high probability of high risk of medication-related problems (P = 0.046) were less likely to engage in physical activity more than once a week and more subject to being overweight (P < 0.01). The probability of polypharmacy or high risk of medication-related problems was higher in participants with lower physical HRQoL, experiencing multi-morbidity, and had fallen twice or more during the last year (all P < 0.05). The percentages of being frail, having visited outpatient services, and having been admitted to hospital during the past year were higher in participants with polypharmacy and at high risk of medication-related problems than their counterparts (all P < 0.001).

Table 2 presents the results from the hierarchical logistic regression about polypharmacy. For each model, multi-collinearity between factors was within acceptable limits (all VIF < 2). After adjusting for all potential factors (model 3), female sex (OR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.42–0.72) was associated with a lower risk of polypharmacy. Participants from Greece (OR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.26–0.71), Croatia (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.28–0.63) and Spain (OR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.36–0.8) had a lower risk of polypharmacy compared to participants from the Netherlands. Having a migration background (OR = 1.67, 95%CI: 1.08–2.59), being overweight (OR = 1.37, 95%CI: 1.04–1.79) or being obese (OR = 1.78, 95%CI: 1.26–2.51) were associated with a higher risk of polypharmacy. A higher level of physical HRQoL (OR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.95–0.98) was associated with a lower risk of polypharmacy. Participants with multi-morbidity (OR = 3.73, 95%CI: 2.18–6.37), being frail (OR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.24–2.30), or having visited outpatient services during the last year (OR = 1.77, 95%CI: 1.09–2.88) had a higher risk of polypharmacy than counterparts.

Table 2 Hierarchical logistic longitudinal regression models fitted on polypharmacy at follow-up (n = 1451a)
Full size table

Table 3 presents the results from the hierarchical logistic regression about medication-related problems. For each model, multi-collinearity factors were within acceptable limits (all VIF < 2). After adjusting for all potential factors (model 3), older age (OR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.94–0.98) or female sex (OR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.39–0.65) were associated with a lower risk of medication-related problems. Participants from Croatia (OR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.41–0.98) were less likely to have a high risk of medication-related problems than those from the Netherlands. Having a migration background (OR = 1.81, 95%CI: 1.19–2.77), obesity (OR = 1.57, 95%CI: 1.13–2.19), having multi-morbidity (OR = 1.87, 95%CI: 1.19–2.93), being frail (OR = 1.75, 95%CI: 1.30–2.36), or having visited outpatient services during the last year (OR = 2.57, 95%CI: 1.54–4.29) were associated with the high risk of medication-related problems. A higher physical HRQoL (OR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.96–0.99) was associated with a lower risk of medication-related problems.

Table 3 Hierarchical logistic longitudinal regression models fitted on the risk of medication-related problems at follow-up (n = 1451a)
Full size table

Supplementary Table S2 presents the association between polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems in the study population. Compared with participants without polypharmacy at follow-up, participants with polypharmacy were more likely to have a high risk of medication-related problems (P < 0.001).

Non-response analysis

Compared to the population-for-analysis (n = 1451), participants excluded from the study due to the missing data (n = 874) were more likely from the UK and less likely from Spain (P < 0.001), more likely to engage in physical activity once a week or less (P < 0.05), less likely having visited outpatient services during the past year (P < 0.001), more likely having been admitted to hospital during the past year (P < 0.05), more likely being malnutrition (P < 0.05).

Discussion

The present study assessed the factors longitudinally associated with polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems in a large sample of older community-dwelling people in Europe. Multiple factors (i.e. sex, migration background, HRQoL, multi-morbidity, BMI, frailty, and outpatient service use during the last year) were significantly associated with polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems.

In the present study, no association was found between age and polypharmacy. This result is not in line with previous studies' findings, which reported that older people are more likely to have polypharmacy [13, 15]. A possible explanation could be the relatively high age of the participants in our study compared with previous studies. A nationwide report from Italy found that medication use increases steeply until age 85–90 years and then declines substantially [36]. The reason might be that medication prescribing and utilization are generally treated cautiously among very old people [37]. It may explain the absence of the association between age and polypharmacy in our study population with a mean age of 80. It may also explain that in our study, there was a negative association between age and a high risk of medication-related problems, which is consistence with the study from Katharina Tabea Jungo et al. [38]. Further studies are needed to explore the association between age and polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems among older people.

We confirmed that women were less likely to have polypharmacy and were at a lower risk of medication-related problems than men [39]. The possible explanation could be that women are more likely to care about their health status; they consult doctors more regularly and earlier than men [39]. Therefore, women might accumulate more experience and knowledge on medication use than men of the same age. However, our result was inconsistent with findings from other studies [40, 41], which showed that the female sex was associated with an increased risk of medication-related problems. Therefore, the association between sex and the risk of medication-related problems is inconclusive, and more studies are needed.

Our results also showed that participants with a migration background were more likely to be at risk of polypharmacy and at high risk of medication-related problems. The explanation could be that participants with a migration background have personal beliefs about medication that rely on their background (e.g. cultural, core values, religious and health-related experience), which may differ from the healthcare providers of the country they reside in [42]. Additionally, the communication between participants with a migration background and healthcare providers could be challenging due to the possible language differences [43]. Furthermore, participants with a migration background might know less about the local health system (e.g. health insurance coverage, treatment process) and might experience barriers when receiving the appropriate health service, including medication prescribing [44]. Thus, services adapted to the population's specific needs with migration background, such as translated and simplified information on prescription use, may reduce polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems [45].

We found that a higher physical HRQoL was associated with a lower risk of polypharmacy, as well as a lower risk of medication-related problems. Meanwhile, mental HRQoL was not significantly associated with polypharmacy or the high risk of medication-related problems. These findings are consistent with previous studies in the USA [46,47,48].

Our results showed that older people with multi-morbidity were more likely to have polypharmacy and a high risk of medication-related problems. Multiple medical specialists may treat people with multiple chronic conditions, and specialists may not know what medicines their patients are taking, which may lead to inappropriate prescribing [19, 49]. In addition, the high risk of medication-related problems and poor adherence by the patient may be due to a lack of adequate communication between prescribers and pharmacies [3]. Thus, better communication on each condition between patients and their specialists, between different specialists is essential for people with multiple chronic conditions.

Our study confirmed that frail older people are more likely to be at high risk of polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems [38]. The explanation could be that frail people are more likely to have multi-morbidity [2, 28, 49].

We found that participants who used outpatient services during the last 12 months were more likely to have polypharmacy and have a high risk of medication-related problems. Hu et al. showed that more frequent access to outpatient services is associated with more prescriptions and a higher risk of medication-related problems [49].

Younger age, male sex, migration background, frailty, and outpatient services utilization during the last 12 months were negatively associated with the change in the risk of medication-related problems but not significantly associated with the change in polypharmacy risk. However, lower physical HRQoL and higher risk of multi-morbidity were significantly associated with the change in the risk of medication-related problems but not polypharmacy risk. The differences in the associations of the above factors on change of polypharmacy and the risk of medication-related problems are due to the information difference in which polypharmacy and medication-related problems are covered. Polypharmacy measures the number of medicines the participants take, which captures part of the medication-related problems a participant may encounter. On the other hand, MRQ offers a wider measure of the risk of medication-related problems, for example, information on following the prescription correctly. Further studies are needed to explore the association between the above factors and medication utilization.

Methodological considerations

Our results need to be interpreted with caution. The population in this study is 75 years and older, so we cannot generalize our findings to the entire community-dwelling older population. The risk of medication-related problems were assessed by the self-reported questionnaire MRQ, which reflects different medication-related problems (e.g. poor adherence, inadequate monitoring). However, individual prescriptions or inappropriate drug selection were not assessed in the questionnaire. Therefore, caution is needed when interpreting the results.

Conclusions

Multiple factors in demography, lifestyle, nutrition, and health care use are associated with polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems. Polypharmacy is a single and important element that may reflect the number of medications taken. To comprehensively assess the context of medication use among older people, the broader content of medication-related problems should be considered as well. These provide starting points to improve interventions to reduce polypharmacy and the risk of medication-related problems. In the meantime, health professionals can apply these insights to identify subgroups of patients at a high risk of polypharmacy and having a high risk of medication-related problems.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy/ethical restrictions but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

UHCE:

Urban Health Centres Europe

MRQ:

Medication Risk Questionnaire

ISCED:

The International Standard Classification of Education

BMI:

Body mass index

AUDIT-C:

The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test

SNAQ-65 + :

The Short Nutrition Assessment Questionnaire 65 + 

MUAC:

Mid-upper arm circumference

WHO:

World Health Organization

HRQoL:

Health-related quality of life

SF-12:

The 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey

PCS:

Physical Component Summary

MCS:

Mental Component Summary

TFI:

The Tilburg Frailty Indicator

SD:

Standard deviation

OR:

Odds ratios

95%CI:

95% Confidence intervals

VIF:

Variance Inflation Factor

References

  1. World Health Organization. Ageing and health. 2022. [cited 2022 04–01–2022]; Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health.

  2. Barnett K, et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lavan AH, Gallagher PF, O’Mahony D. Methods to reduce prescribing errors in elderly patients with multimorbidity. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:857–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gnjidic D, et al. Polypharmacy cutoff and outcomes: five or more medicines were used to identify community-dwelling older men at risk of different adverse outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(9):989–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Association. PCNE Classification for Drug-Related Problems V9.1 [cited June 12, 2022]; Available from: https://www.pcne.org/working-groups/2/drug-related-problem-classification/10.

  6. Linnebur JMRSA. Drug-Related Problems in Older Adults. 2022. [cited June 2022 12]; Available from: https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/geriatrics/drug-therapy-in-older-adults/drug-related-problems-in-older-adults.

  7. Barenholtz Levy H. Self-administered medication-risk questionnaire in an elderly population. Ann Pharmacother. 2003;37(7–8):982–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoel R.W, Giddings Connolly R.M, Takahashi P.Y. Polypharmacy management in older patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(1):p.242-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg RM, et al. Drug-drug and drug-disease interactions in the ED: analysis of a high-risk population. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14(5):447–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Salazar JA, Poon I, Nair M. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly: expect the unexpected, think the unthinkable. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2007;6(6):695–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gurwitz JH, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA. 2003;289(9):1107–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurwitz JH, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in nursing homes. Am J Med. 2000;109(2):87–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marengoni A, et al. Strategies to improve medication adherence in older persons: consensus statement from the Senior Italia Federanziani advisory board. Drugs Aging. 2016;33(9):629–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Walckiers DJ, Van der Heyden J, Tafforeau J. Factors associated with excessive polypharmacy in older people. Archives Public Health = Archives belges de sante publique. 2015;73:50–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Castioni J, et al. Prevalence and determinants of polypharmacy in Switzerland: data from the CoLaus study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):840.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Salvi F, et al. Is polypharmacy an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after an emergency department visit? Intern Emerg Med. 2017;12(2):213–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beer C, et al. Quality use of medicines and health outcomes among a cohort of community dwelling older men: an observational study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;71(4):592–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurczewska-Michalak M, et al. Polypharmacy management in the older adults: a scoping review of available interventions. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:734045.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim J, Parish AL. Polypharmacy and medication management in older adults. Nurs Clin North Am. 2017;52(3):457–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Franse CB, et al. Evaluation design of Urban Health Centres Europe (UHCE): preventive integrated health and social care for community-dwelling older persons in five European cities. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Franse CB, et al. The effectiveness of a coordinated preventive care approach for healthy ageing (UHCE) among older persons in five European cities: a pre-post controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;88:153–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Franse CB, et al. A coordinated preventive care approach for healthy ageing in five European cities: a mixed methods study of process evaluation components. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(12):3689–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khezrian M, et al. An overview of prevalence, determinants and health outcomes of polypharmacy. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020;11:2042098620933741.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Levy HB, Steffen AM. Validating the medication risk questionnaire with family caregivers of older adults. Consult Pharm. 2016;31(6):329–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Organisation for Economic, C.-o. and Development, Classifying educational programmes: manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. 1999, [Paris]: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 113 p.

  26. Bush K, et al. The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(16):1789–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Romero-Ortuno R, et al. A frailty instrument for primary care: findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). BMC Geriatr. 2010;10:57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ye L, et al. Factors associated with physical, psychological and social frailty among community-dwelling older persons in Europe: a cross-sectional study of Urban Health Centres Europe (UHCE). BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):422.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wijnhoven HA, et al. Development and validation of criteria for determining undernutrition in community-dwelling older men and women: The short nutritional assessment questionnaire 65+. Clin Nutr. 2012;31(3):351–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ware J, Kosinski M Jr., Keller S.D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Provencher V, et al. Frail older adults with minor fractures show lower health-related quality of life (SF-12) scores up to six months following emergency department discharge. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14:40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Nolte E, Knai C, McKee M. Managing chronic conditions: experience in eight countries. Regional Office for Europe. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, European Observatory on Health Systems: 15. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2008. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/107920.

  33. Gobbens RJ, Schols JM, van Assen MA. Exploring the efficiency of the tilburg frailty indicator: a review. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1739–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gobbens RJ, et al. The tilburg frailty indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010;11(5):344–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Myers RH. Classical and modern regression with applications. 2nd ed. Boston (Mass.): PWS-KENT; 1990.

  36. Onder G, et al. Advanced age and medication prescription: more years, less medications? a nationwide report from the Italian medicines agency. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(2):168–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wastesson JW, et al. Changes in drug use and polypharmacy after the age of 90: a longitudinal study of the Danish 1905 cohort. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(1):160–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jungo KT, Streit S, Lauffenburger JC. Patient factors associated with new prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications in multimorbid US older adults using multiple medications. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Venturini CD, et al. Gender differences, polypharmacy, and potential pharmacological interactions in the elderly. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(11):1867–72.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Guaraldo L, et al. Inappropriate medication use among the elderly: a systematic review of administrative databases. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11:79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Nothelle SK, et al. Factors associated with potentially inappropriate medication use in community-dwelling older adults in the United States: a systematic review. Int J Pharm Pract. 2019;27(5):408–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Khanderia U, et al. Medication adherence following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: assessment of beliefs and attitudes. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42(2):192–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hudson DL, et al. Race, life course socioeconomic position, racial discrimination, depressive symptoms and self-rated health. Soc Sci Med. 2013;97:7–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Evandrou M, et al. Ethnic inequalities in limiting health and self-reported health in later life revisited. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(7):653–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rechel B, et al. Migration and health in an increasingly diverse Europe. Lancet. 2013;381(9873):1235–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Babcock ZR, Kogut SJ, Vyas A. Association between polypharmacy and health-related quality of life among cancer survivors in the United States. J Cancer Surviv. 2020;14(1):89–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vyas A, Kang F, Barbour M. Association between polypharmacy and health-related quality of life among US adults with cardiometabolic risk factors. Qual Life Res. 2020;29(4):977–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Henderson J.A, Buchwald D, Manson S.M. Relationship of medication use to health-related quality of life among a group of older American Indians. J Appl Gerontol. 2006;25(1_suppl):89S-104S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hu SH, et al. Medication discrepancy and potentially inappropriate medication in older Chinese-American home-care patients after hospital discharge. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012;10(5):284–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all participating older persons and all organizations and professionals involved in the Urban Health Centres Europe project.

Funding

Urban Health Centres Europe is funded by the European Union, Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (CHAFEA), third health program, number 20131201.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O, . Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Lizhen Ye, Junwen Yang-Huang, Carmen Betsy Franse & Hein Raat

  2. Department of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia

    Tomislav Rukavina & Vanja Vasiljev

  3. Department of Microbiology, Teaching Institute of Public Health of Primorsko-Goranska, County, Rijeka, Croatia

    Tomislav Rukavina

  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Francesco Mattace-Raso

  5. Epidemiology and Public Health Group, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Arpana Verma

  6. Polibienestar Research Institute - Universitat de València ES, Valencia, Spain

    Tamara Alhambra Borrás

  7. Alliance for Integrated Care, Athens, Greece

    Tasos Rentoumis

Authors
  1. Lizhen Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junwen Yang-Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carmen Betsy Franse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tomislav Rukavina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vanja Vasiljev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Francesco Mattace-Raso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Arpana Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tamara Alhambra Borrás
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tasos Rentoumis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hein Raat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.Z.Y. and H.R.: study concept and design. C.F., T.R., V.V., F.M.R., A.V., T.A.B., A.R., and H.R.: acquisition of subjects and data. L.Z.Y., J.Y.H., and H.R.: analysis and interpretation of data. L.Z.Y. and J.Y.H.: preparation of manuscript. All authors: critical revision and final approval of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hein Raat.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committees in all participating cities and funded by the European Commission Executive Agency for Health and Consumers. The names of the review board and the approval references are: Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Medische Ethische Toetsings Commissie (METC)—Erasmus MC Rotterdam; 08/01/2015; MEC-2014–661; Pallini, Greece: The Ethics and Scientific board—Latriko Palaiou Falirou Hospital; 04/03/2015; 20150304–01; Rijeka, Croatia: The Ethical Committee—Faculty of Medicine University of Rijeka; 07–04-2014; 2170–24-01–14-02; Valencia, Spain: Comisión de Investigación—Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia. 29/01/2015; CICHGUV-2015–01-29; Manchester, United Kingdom: NRES Committee West Midlands—Coventry & Warwickshire; 06–03-2015; 15/WM/0080; NRES Committee South Central Berkshire B; 29–20-2014; 14/SC/1349. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants [20]. The study was registered in the ISRCTN registry as ISRCTN52788952. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing  interests

The authors have no conflicts.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table S1.

 8 items on the risk of medication-risk questionnaire [1]. Supplementary Table S2. The associationbetween polypharmacy and the risk of medication-related problems in the studypopulation. (n=1791).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, L., Yang-Huang, J., Franse, C.B. et al. Factors associated with polypharmacy and the high risk of medication-related problems among older community-dwelling adults in European countries: a longitudinal study. BMC Geriatr 22, 841 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03536-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03536-z

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us