Skip to main content
Download PDF

The correlation between nutrition and frailty and the receiver operating characteristic curve of different nutritional indexes for frailty

BMC Geriatrics volume 21, Article number: 619 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Frailty is a kind of geriatric syndrome, which is very common in the elderly. Patients with malnutrition are at higher risk of frailty. This study explored the correlation between nutrition and frailty and compared the receiver operating characteristic curve of different nutritional indexes for frailty.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 179 inpatients aged ≥65 years old. Frailty was measured using Fried Frailty Phenotype, handgrip strength was measured using JAMAR@Plus and the 4.57 m usual gait speed was measured using a stopwatch. Comprehensive nutritional assessment refers to the application of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) to assess the nutritional status of patients.

Results

Compared with the non-frailty group, the upper arm circumference, calf circumference, hemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin, cholesterol and low density lipoprotein in the frailty group were lower (P < 0.05). Comprehensive nutritional assessment, whether as a categorical variable or a continuous variable, was significantly correlated with frailty (P < 0.05). Model1 showed that the risk of frailty in malnourished patients was 3.381 times higher than that in well nourished patients (P = 0.036). Model2 showed that the risk of frailty decreased by 13.8% for every 1 point increase in MNA score (P = 0.009). The area under the curves of albumin, prealbumin and hemoglobin was larger (AUC > 0.65), AUC was 0.718, 0.693 and 0.743, respectively.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that malnutrition is closely related to frailty. As for single nutritional indexes, albumin, prealbumin and hemoglobin were found to be associated with frailty. Further cohort studies are needed to verify their ability to screen for frailty.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Frailty is undoubtedly one of the most serious global public health challenges we will confront in the coming century. The rapid expansion of the aging population has led to a corresponding increase in the number of frail elderly [1, 2]. Frailty is defined as a clinical state in which individuals are more likely to have health-related negative events when exposed to endogenous or exogenous stressors [3, 4]. Frailty is a dynamic evolution process from health to weakness, in which the degree of weakness can develop to any direction with the passage of time [2]. Accordingly, frailty may be reversible, and its related functional decline is also a disease that may be prevented [5].

Nutrition is a crucial factor closely related to frailty syndrome [6]. Malnutrition can significantly aggravate the development of frailty, because long-term malnutrition, insufficient protein and energy intake can lead to weight loss (one of the five criteria of frailty phenotype), fatigue, weakness, slow walking speed and low level of physical activity [7]. The pathophysiology of frailty is complex and multifactorial, and nutrition is an important mechanism of its pathogenesis and a specific target of treatment [8]. People are more and more interested in the relationship between frailty and nutrition, but previous studies rarely compared the relationship between different nutritional indicators and frailty, so these variables were studied in this study. The results can be used as an important clue to provide nutritional care for elderly patients.

Materials and methods

Study design

This work is a cross-sectional study conducted in the cadre ward of the First Hospital of Jilin University from December 2020 to June 2021. In patients aged 65 years or above were recruited. Patients who were unable to walk for neuromusculoskeletal diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, severe knee or hip osteoarthritis, lumbar spinal stenosis, and Participants with malignant tumors, severe cognitive impairment, autoimmune diseases, severe liver and kidney dysfunction were excluded from the study. The study was in line with the declaration of Helsinki Declaration and approved by the ethics committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University.

Measurements

General information

Age, gender and exercise were evaluated by self-made face-to-face interview questionnaire.

Clinical information comes from electronic medical records, including smoking history, drinking history, types and diseases of chronic diseases, hemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin, cholesterol, triglyceride and low density lipoprotein Cholesterol.

Anthropometric measurements

  1. (1)

    Height and weight were measured according to clinical standards.

  2. (2)

    Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared.

  3. (3)

    Walking speed was calculated as 4.57 m walk time divided by 4.57 m [9, 10]. Participants walked at daily speed. Time was recorded with a stopwatch (accurate to 0.01 s). The average value was calculated after the second measurement.

  4. (4)

    Handgrip strength of the dominant hand was measured by handgrip dynamometer (JAMAR@Plus) for 3 times, and the maximum handgrip strength was taken for analysis [11, 12].

  5. (5)

    Participants stood with their feet shoulder width apart and the calf circumference around the most prominent part of the gastrocnemius muscle was measured (accurate to 0.1 cm).

  6. (6)

    Arm circumference at the level of the thickest part of biceps brachii muscle was measured with the upper limb sags naturally (accurate to 0.1 cm).

Frailty assessment

Frailty was defined as a major biological phenotype by Fried Frailty Phenotype [13]. Satisfying three or more of the five followings were diagnosed as frailty syndrome, including weight loss of more than 4.5 kg or > 5%, fatigue, less physical activity, slow pace and weak handgrip in the past year. Fatigue refers to feeling that everything needs effort or can’t move forward for three or more days. The decrease of handgrip strength was estimated by lower limit of handgrip strength which was determined according to the participants’ gender and body mass index. Decreased handgrip strength of male: BMI ≤ 24.0 kg/m2, handgrip strength ≤29 kg; 24.1 ≤ BMI ≤ 28.0 kg/m2, handgrip strength ≤30 kg; BMI > 28 kg/m2, handgrip strength ≤32 kg. Decreased handgrip strength of female: BMI ≤ 23.0 kg/m2, handgrip strength ≤17 kg; 23.1 ≤ BMI ≤ 26.0 kg/m2, handgrip strength ≤17.3 kg; 26.1 ≤ BMI ≤ 29.0 kg/m2, handgrip strength ≤18 kg; BMI > 29 kg/m2, handgrip strength ≤21 kg. Male < 383 kcal / week or female < 270 kcal / week was judged as physical activity decrease. Walking speed was calculated by the time required to walk 4.57 m, male with height ≤ 173 cm, walking speed ≥7 s or height > 173 cm, walking speed ≥6 s was identified as walking speed descent; while the standard of walking speed descent among female is height ≤ 159 cm, walking speed ≥7 s or height > 159 cm, walking speed ≥6 s.

Malnutrition

Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is a nutritional assessment tool with 18 questions specially developed for the elderly. It consists of four parts: anthropometry (body mass index, calf circumference and arm circumference measurement), self-reported health status, dietary problems (including weight loss) and clinical health status. MNA was used to comprehensively evaluate the nutritional status of elderly patients [14, 15]. The total score of MNA is 30 points, if the score was < 17 points, patients were classified as malnutrition; if the score was between 17 to 23.5 points, patients were at the risk of malnutrition; good nutrition, if the score was > 23.5 points.

Data analysis

SPSS/WIN 23.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) or MedCalc 18.2.1 (MedCalc, Mariakerke, Belgium) was used for statistical analysis. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test the normality of continuous variables. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (IQR) based on the distribution characteristics of the data. Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to test the difference between two groups. Classified variables were described as absolute number and percentages, and the difference between two groups was test by Chi-squared test. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to explore the association between malnutrition and frailty. The AUC value was calculated by drawing ROC curve to identify the association between different nutritional indexes and senile frailty. The Youden index was used to determine the optimal cutoff point. Comparison of two ROC curves was based on the method of Delong et al. [16]. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

General baseline characteristics of patients

As shown in Table 1, a total of 179 participants participated in the study. There were 60 patients in the frailty group with an average age of 84.87 ± 7.79, and 119 patients in the non-frailty group with an average age of 77.37 ± 8.98. The age difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). In addition, there were significant differences in the proportion of smoking and exercise. The difference in the number of chronic diseases, activities of daily living score, MNA score and nutritional status between the two groups were also exhibit statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Table 1 General baseline characteristics
Full size table

Comparison of the anthropometric parameters and the nutrition index of laboratory between the frailty group and the non-frailty group

As shown in Table 2, compared with the non-frailty group, the upper arm circumference, calf circumference, hemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin, cholesterol and low density lipoprotein of patients in the frailty group were lower (P < 0.05).

Table 2 Comparison of nutritional indexes between the frailty group and the non- frailty group
Full size table

Relationship between comprehensive nutritional assessment and frailty

As shown in Table 3, we incorporated the comprehensive assessment of nutrition into the Logistic regression model in the form of categorical variables and continuous variables to explore the relationship between nutrition and frailty. The results showed that nutrition was significantly correlated with weakness, whether as a categorical variable or a continuous variable (P < 0.05). Model1 showed that the risk of frailty in malnourished patients was 3.381 times higher than well-nourished patients (P = 0.036). Model2 showed that the risk of frailty decreased by 13.8% for every 1 point increase in MNA score (P = 0.009).

Table 3 Comprehensive assessment of nutrition and frailty
Full size table

The association of MNA score, anthropometric parameters and laboratory index with the occurrence of frailty

The correlation between different nutritional indexes on the occurrence of frailty in elderly was analyzed and compared. Results are shown in Table 4, the area under the curve of MNA score, albumin, prealbumin and hemoglobin was larger (AUC > 0.65), AUC was 0.773, 0.718, 0.693 and 0.743, respectively. However, through the comparison, it was found that MNA score did not exhibit obvious superiority for the occurrence of frailty than albumin, prealbumin and hemoglobin. The relevant ROC curve is shown in Fig. 1.

Table 4 Correlation between nutritional indexes and debilitation
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure1

The receiver operating characteristic curve of different nutritional indexes for frailty

Full size image

Discussion

In addition to confirming previous reports, the advantage of our research lies in a more comprehensive analysis of the correlation between different nutritional indicators (anthropometric index, Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), laboratory related indicators) and frailty, and further study and explore the relationship between them by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curve of different nutritional indexes. For a single nutritional index, our study found that albumin, prealbumin and hemoglobin are related to frailty, which provides a clue for screening frailty in the future. A review on frailty and malnutrition in 2016 supports this conclusion and points out that both malnutrition and frailty are reversible and the incorrectly identification can lead to the onset of disability. Nutritional therapy, protein rich diet, correction of vitamin D deficiency and physical activity are all basic aspects of multidisciplinary treatment of senile frailty [7]. A recent review has also shown the importance of quantitative (energy intake) and qualitative (nutritional quality) factors of nutrition in the development of senile frailty syndrome [17]. Nutritional research on the prevention and management of frailty shows that a healthier diet, such as the Mediterranean diet, is mainly to improve physical activity and walking speed and reduce the risk of falls [18].

Our study also found that there were significant differences in the proportion of smoking and exercise, the number of chronic diseases, the ADL score, MNA score and nutritional status between the frailty group and the non-frailty group (P < 0.05). Smoking is a risk factor for atherosclerosis [19], and atherosclerosis is a common mechanism of frailty [20]. So our study found that people who smoke for a long time were more prone to frailty. Myasthenia is a major component of the frailty syndrome, both are considered as a powerful predictor of incidence rate, disability and death in the elderly. Exercise intervention and nutritional supplements are the strategies for preventing and treating muscle wasting and frailty [21]. Chronic diseases are considered to be the main determinant of physical weakness [22]. According to the widely used construction of frailty phenotype proposed by Fried et al. [13], chronic diseases play a central role in the beginning or deterioration of frailty. This study also found that weakness is related to the number of chronic diseases [23]. Studies find that the decrease of hemoglobin [24,25,26] and albumin [26, 27] levels in circular blood is associated with the incidence of frailty, which also supports our study. In a recent systematic review, nutrition is identified as a means of delaying the occurrence of negative consequences of frailty in the elderly [28] and a method of slowing the development and progress of frailty in the age [17]. High quality diet matching is very important. Diet rich in antioxidants is an important factor in preventing and delaying the onset of frailty of old people [17]. Another study has found that there is a correlation between insufficient energy, nutrition intake and frailty of the elderly, energy intake ≤21 kcal / kg / day is associated with frailty, and intake of more than three nutrients (poor nutritional score) is significantly related to the frailty [29].

The occurrence of frailty may involve a variety of pathophysiological pathways. Age related changes (mitochondrial dysfunction, neuronal degeneration, cell senescence, stem cell degeneration, DNA methylation and injury, autophagy), gene and environment (cognition, nutrition, activity), energy metabolism changes caused by chronic diseases (cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, arthritis, obesity), stress response injury (chronic inflammation, HPA axis, autonomic nervous system), chronic inflammation, HPA axis, autonomic nervous system, decreased neural function, decrease of anabolic hormones, eventually leading to physical weakness [2]. The acceleration of low-grade inflammatory activity may be a potential cause of frailty syndrome. Studies have proved that the increased of cytokines IL6, CRP and TNF α levels are associated with frailty [30,31,32]. Changes in the endocrine system provide a basis for frailty. The endocrine hormones associated with frailty are testosterone and its precursor DHEA, parathyroid hormone (PTH), vitamin D and insulin-like growth factor [33]. Increased HbA1c levels have been repeatedly shown to be associated with a higher incidence rate of frailty syndrome [34, 35]. A series of commonly used serum markers have been evaluated as potentially associated with frailty, and glomerular filtration rate and albumin level are particularly noteworthy as potential indicators of frailty [33]. In addition to studying the relationship between different nutritional indicators and frailty, we also further study and explore the relationship between them by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curve of different nutritional indexes. We found that albumin, prealbumin and hemoglobin were associated with frailty. It has also been found that elderly people at risk of malnutrition are more likely to develop geriatric syndrome (such as frailty syndrome or sarcopenia) than well nourished elderly people [36]. Therefore, early identification of malnutrition can reduce the incidence of senile frailty.

There are several limitations in current study. The main limitation is that this study is a cross-sectional design, so there is no statement of causality. Another limitation is the study samples are from one medical center, so the results are limited in universality. In conclusion, more prospective cohort studies in the elderly are needed to further understand the potential role of nutrition in preventing, delaying or reversing frailty syndrome.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that malnutrition is closely related to frailty. As for single nutritional indexes, albumin, prealbumin and hemoglobin were found to be associated with frailty. Further cohort studies are needed to verify their ability to screen for frailty.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ADL:

Ability of daily living

MNA:

Mini Nutritional Assessment

AC:

Arm circumference

CC:

Calf circumference

Alb:

Albumin

LDL-C:

Low density lipoprotein cholesterol

References

  1. 1.

    Mousa A, Savva GM, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K, Jagger C, Brayne C, et al. Is frailty a stable predictor of mortality across time? Evidence from the cognitive function and ageing studies. Age Ageing. 2018;47(5):721–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dent E, Martin FC, Bergman H, Woo J, Romero-Ortuno R, Walston JD. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1376–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cesari M, Calvani R, Marzetti E. Frailty in older persons. Clin Geriatr Med. 2017;33(3):293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA, Anker SD, Bauer JM, Bernabei R, et al. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(6):392–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Baztán JJ, De la Puente M, Socorro A. Frailty, functional decline and mortality in hospitalized older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(4):664–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bonnefoy M, Berrut G, Lesourd B, Ferry M, Gilbert T, Guérin O, et al. Frailty and nutrition: searching for evidence. J Nutr Health Aging. 2015;19(3):250–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Artaza-Artabe I, Sáez-López P, Sánchez-Hernández N, Fernández-Gutierrez N, Malafarina V. The relationship between nutrition and frailty: effects of protein intake, nutritional supplementation, vitamin D and exercise on muscle metabolism in the elderly. A systematic review. Maturitas. 2016;93:89–99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Malafarina V, Uriz-Otano F, Iniesta R, Gil-Guerrero L. Sarcopenia in the elderly: diagnosis, physiopathology and treatment. Maturitas. 2012;71(2):109–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Marzban M, Nabipour I, Farhadi A, Ostovar A, Larijani B, Darabi AH, et al. Association between anemia, physical performance and cognitive function in Iranian elderly people: evidence from Bushehr Elderly Health (BEH) program. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):329.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    da Silva VD, Tribess S, Meneguci J, Sasaki JE, Santos DAT, Carneiro JAO, et al. Time spent in sedentary behaviour as discriminant criterion for frailty in older adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(7):1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mendes J, Amaral TF, Borges N, Santos A, Padrão P, Moreira P, et al. Handgrip strength values of Portuguese older adults: a population based study. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rodacki ALF, Boneti Moreira N, Pitta A, Wolf R, Melo Filho J, Rodacki CLN, et al. Is handgrip strength a useful measure to evaluate lower limb strength and functional performance in older women? Clin Interv Aging. 2020;15:1045–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Guigoz Y. The mini nutritional assessment (MNA) review of the literature--what does it tell us? J Nutr Health Aging. 2006;10(6):466–85 discussion 85-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Assessing the nutritional status of the elderly: the mini nutritional assessment as part of the geriatric evaluation. Nutr Rev. 1996;54(1 Pt 2):S59–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lorenzo-López L, Maseda A, de Labra C, Regueiro-Folgueira L, Rodríguez-Villamil JL, Millán-Calenti JC. Nutritional determinants of frailty in older adults: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Talegawkar SA, Bandinelli S, Bandeen-Roche K, Chen P, Milaneschi Y, Tanaka T, et al. A higher adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet is inversely associated with the development of frailty in community-dwelling elderly men and women. J Nutr. 2012;142(12):2161–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lu H, Daugherty A. Atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(3):485–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tamura Y, Omura T, Toyoshima K, Araki A. Nutrition management in older adults with diabetes: a review on the importance of shifting prevention strategies from metabolic syndrome to frailty. Nutrients. 2020;12(11):3367.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Nascimento CM, Ingles M, Salvador-Pascual A, Cominetti MR, Gomez-Cabrera MC, Viña J. Sarcopenia, frailty and their prevention by exercise. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019;132:42–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Onder G, Vetrano DL, Marengoni A, Bell JS, Johnell K, Palmer K. Accounting for frailty when treating chronic diseases. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;56:49–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Renne I, Gobbens RJ. Effects of frailty and chronic diseases on quality of life in Dutch community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:325–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Palmer K, Vetrano DL, Marengoni A, Tummolo AM, Villani ER, Acampora N, et al. The relationship between anaemia and frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(8):965–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sanchis J, Núñez E, Ruiz V, Bonanad C, Fernández J, Cauli O, et al. Usefulness of clinical data and biomarkers for the identification of frailty after acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31(12):1462–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mailliez A, Guilbaud A, Puisieux F, Dauchet L, Boulanger É. Circulating biomarkers characterizing physical frailty: CRP, hemoglobin, albumin, 25OHD and free testosterone as best biomarkers. Results of a meta-analysis. Exp Gerontol. 2020;139:111014.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hubbard RE, O'Mahony MS, Savva GM, Calver BL, Woodhouse KW. Inflammation and frailty measures in older people. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(9b):3103–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kelaiditi E, Guyonnet S, Cesari M. Is nutrition important to postpone frailty? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015;18(1):37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bartali B, Frongillo EA, Bandinelli S, Lauretani F, Semba RD, Fried LP, et al. Low nutrient intake is an essential component of frailty in older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(6):589–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Soysal P, Stubbs B, Lucato P, Luchini C, Solmi M, Peluso R, et al. Inflammation and frailty in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;31:1–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Darvin K, Randolph A, Ovalles S, Halade D, Breeding L, Richardson A, et al. Plasma protein biomarkers of the geriatric syndrome of frailty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(2):182–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Liu CK, Lyass A, Larson MG, Massaro JM, Wang N, D'Agostino RB Sr, et al. Biomarkers of oxidative stress are associated with frailty: the Framingham offspring study. Age (Dordr). 2016;38(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Saedi AA, Feehan J, Phu S, Duque G. Current and emerging biomarkers of frailty in the elderly. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:389–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    García-Esquinas E, Graciani A, Guallar-Castillón P, López-García E, Rodríguez-Mañas L, Rodríguez-Artalejo F. Diabetes and risk of frailty and its potential mechanisms: a prospective cohort study of older adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(9):748–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Abdelhafiz AH, Rodríguez-Mañas L, Morley JE, Sinclair AJ. Hypoglycemia in older people - a less well recognized risk factor for frailty. Aging Dis. 2015;6(2):156–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chang SF. Frailty is a major related factor for at risk of malnutrition in community-dwelling older adults. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017;49(1):63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by the Scientific Technological Development Plan Project in Jilin Province of China (20200404207YY) to J.L.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cadre Ward, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China

    Hong Liang, Xiaoye Lin, Yanmin Ju & Jiyan Leng

  2. Department of Pediatrics, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China

    Xiaoping Li

Authors
  1. Hong Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoye Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yanmin Ju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiyan Leng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HL designed the study, advised on the analysis, and drafted the manuscript. XPL, XYL and JYL advised on the study design, helped to analyze, and interpret the data. YMJ helped to collect the data and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the version submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiyan Leng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the institutional review committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University (IRB No. 2021-466). Participants need to fill in an informed consent form, including the purpose of the study and the guarantee of anonymity and confidentiality of their information. This study meets the ethical requirements of Helsinki Declaration.

Consent for publication

Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, H., Li, X., Lin, X. et al. The correlation between nutrition and frailty and the receiver operating characteristic curve of different nutritional indexes for frailty. BMC Geriatr 21, 619 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02580-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Frailty
  • Nutrition
  • Inpatients

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us