Skip to main content
Download PDF

Correlation between fat-to-muscle mass ratio and cognitive impairment in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study

BMC Geriatrics volume 24, Article number: 352 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Fat to muscle mass ratio (FMR), a novel index integrating fat and muscle composition, has garnered attention in age-related conditions such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and neurodegenerative diseases. Despite this research on the relationship between FMR and cognitive impairment (CI) in T2DM remains scarce. This study aimed to investigate the sex-specific association between FMR and CI in elderly T2DM patients.

Methods

A total of 768 elderly (> 60 years) T2DM in-patients (356 men and 412 women) were recruited from the Department of Endocrinology at Tianjin Nankai University affiliated hospital. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) was used to assess body composition, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to evaluate cognitive performance. T2DM patients were categorized into normal cognitive function (NC) and cognitive impairment (CI) groups based on MoCA scores and stratified by sex. Binary logistic regression was employed to examine the association between FMR and CI.

Results

Among the participants, 42.7% of men and 56.3% of women experienced cognitive deterioration. Women with CI exhibited lower body mass index (BMI) and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), while men with cognitive disorders showed lower SMI, FMR, and higher fat mass index (FMI). FMR was consistently unrelated to cognition in females, irrespective of adjustment made. However, in males, FMR was significantly associated with an increasing risk of cognitive dysfunction after adjusting for demographic and clinical variables (OR: 1.175, 95% CI: 1.045–1.320, p = 0.007). Furthermore, for each 0.1 increase in FMR, the incidence of CI rose by 31.1% after additional adjustment for BMI. In males, the prevalence of CI increased sequentially across FMR quartiles (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Elderly T2DM men with high FMR had unfavorable cognitive function. FMR is independently associated with an increased risk of CI in male T2DM patients regardless of BMI.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

In the elderly population diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cognitive impairment (CI) had emerged as a significant concern, representing a prominent feature of neurodegenerative conditions. As the aging demographic expands, CI, being a prevalent age-associated condition, has garnered considerable research interest. Epidemiological data shows that dementia prevalence among individuals aged ≥ 60 years in China stands at 6.0%, with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) affecting 15.5% [1]. Moreover epidemiological studies suggest that T2DM heightens the risk of dementia compared with age-matched non-diabetic subjects [2, 3]. Concurrently, diabetic patients with cognitive dysfunction face challenges in effectively self-manage chronic disease, thereby exacerbating the progression of diabetes, thus initiating a vicious cycle [4].

Obesity is an independent risk factor for diabetes [5] prevalent among T2DM patients aged 60 and above. Historically, obesity has been considered as a hazardous factor for cognitive function [6], with excess adipose linked to neurocognitive decline. However, recent studies have presented conflicting findings, with an increasing number failing to establish a direct correlation between obesity and dementia risk, and some even suggesting the opposite. Interestingly, CI has been associated with weight loss in older adults [7]. The influence of obesity on cognitive function may be obscured by the widespread use of body mass index (BMI) as a measure of obesity. In older adults, a high BMI may paradoxically serve as a protective factor for cognitive function, perhaps due to the limitations of BMI in distinguishing between fat mass and muscle mass. Besides a higher BMI indicates better nutritional status, which is conducive to preserve cognitive function [8].Therefore there arises a need to identify new indicators capable of distinguishing between fat and muscle mass.

Fat-to-muscle mass ratio (FMR), a novel index derived from the composition of fat and muscle, has emerged as a promising alternative for assessing the imbalance of muscle and fat [9]. Research indicates that FMR serves as a valuable indicator of metabolic and inflammatory status [10], exhibiting significant correlations with insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome [11], both of which are associated with CI. While a growing number of studies have investigated the role of FMR in cognitive dysfunction, the majority have focused on the general community population [12, 13], leaving a notable gap in research pertaining to patient with T2DM. In this article, we endeavor to elucidate the relationship between FMR and CI in elderly individuals with T2DM, aiming to offer lifestyle recommendations that integrate considerations of both muscle and fat components to enhance cognitive function.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

We conducted a cross-sectional study involving adult subjects aged 60 years and above who had T2DM and attended the Department of Endocrinology in Tianjin Nankai University Affiliated Hospital between July 2018 and May 2022.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

(I) Diagnosis of T2DM in individuals according to the diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1999 [14];(II) Age above 60 years; (III) Sufficient visual and auditory abilities to undergo neuropsychological test and body composition measurement.

Exclusion criteria

(I) Inability to complete neuropsychological scale screening due to speech impairment, hearing loss or reluctant to cooperate; (II) Inability to undergo bio-electrical impedance analysis due to conditions such as edema, paralysis, installed pacemaker, with metal objects insides or reluctant to cooperate; (III) Presence of conditions potentially affecting cognitive function, including head trauma, cerebral ischemia, mental and neurological disorders such as depression, anxiety, delirium, dementia and drug addiction; (IV) Concurrent presence of anemia, severe lung or kidney disease, history of heart failure, malignant tumors, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism etc.; (V) Repeat hospitalization.

Body composition

Body composition analysis adapts direct segmental multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) (InBody720; Biospace Co, Ltd, Seoul, Korea). Subjects were asked to place their five fingers on the surface of the electrode, with their heels and forefeet covering the round electrode. During the measurement, the subject should try to avoid shaking and touching other parts of the body. The measurements were recorded by well-trained staff and completed within 30s. Weight, fat mass and skeletal muscle mass were obtained from the test. BMI = weight (kg) / height2 (m2); Fat Mass Index (FMI) = fat mass (kg) / height2 (m2); Skeletal Muscle mass Index (SMI) = skeletal muscle mass (kg) / height2 (m2); FMR = fat mass (kg) / skeletal muscle mass (kg).

Screening evaluation for cognitive impairment

Global cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. The MoCA test demonstrates a sensitivity of 90% for detecting MCI in older adults with [15]. Higher MoCA scores indicate better cognition, with a threshold score of 25/26 indicating the presence of MCI [16]. Additionally, for participants with 12 years of education or fewer, one point was added to his/ her total MoCA score to calibrate the bias of education level [15].

In this study, we divided the subjects into Normal Cognitive Function (NC) group: MoCA ≥ 26; and Cognitive Impairment (CI) group:MoCA < 26.

Covariates

Participants completed a face-to-face questionnaire regarding their demographic characteristics, including sex, age, years of education, drinking and smoking status, insulin therapy, metformin treatment etc. Marital status was classified as married or single. Regular exercise was defined as engaging in moderate-to-intense physical activity for more than 150 min per week [17]. Diabetic diet control refers to adhering to the dietary recommendations in the Expert Consensus on Diagnosis and Treatment measures for Chinese Elderly Patients with T2DM [18]. Prior history of diseases was provided by self-report and medical records, including hypoglycemia in last three months, diabetic nephropathy, cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease. Blood pressure is measured by a professional using a standard upper arm type electronic blood pressure monitor (Omron, HBP-9021).

Subjects were required to fast overnight for at least 8 h for further serum biochemical analysis. Indicators including Fast Plasma Glucose (FPG), Total Cholesterol (TC), Triglycerides (TG) were tested by an automatic biochemical analyzer (TBA-120FR, Toshiba, Japan), while hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was analyzed using a fully automated Glycohemoglobin analyzer (HA-8180, ARKRAY, Japan).

Statistical analysis

The baseline characteristics with continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) according to the consequence of normal distribution test and categorical variables as an absolute number and percentage (%) of the total. Student’s t test was used for comparison of normally distributed data between the two groups, and Mann Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed data. Categorical data were analyzed by chi-square test. Because the body composition of males and females are significantly different, our analysis further conducted stratified by sex.

To evaluate the correlation between FMR and CI, logistic regression was adopted to calculate the Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) in multiple models. Model 1 adjusted for age, years of education; Model 2 further adjusted for being married, dietary control of diabetes, smoking, diabetic nephropathy, cerebrovascular disease, systolic blood pressure (SBP), HbA1c and metformin. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the correlations between FMR quartiles and the risk of CI. For quartiles 2–4, the OR and 95% CI of cognitive impairment were calculated and compared with the lowest quartile as the reference category stratified by sex. Statistical analysis was conducted by SPSS version 25.0 with a significance level set at a two-tailed p value of < 0.05 for all tests.

Result

Baseline characteristics

Figure 1 described the flow chart of our study. Among the 927 subjects diagnosed with T2DM, 768 subjects were ultimately enrolled in the study based on the exclusion criteria. This group comprised 356 men (46.4%, mean age 66.7) and 412 women (mean age 67.1). The characteristics of participants grouped by cognitive status are displayed in Table 1. Participants with CI tended to be older, female, solitude, and had lower level of education, less dietary control, a higher prevalence of cerebrovascular disease, lower SMI (9.34 ± 1.11 vs. 9.70 ± 1.11, p < 0.001) and higher FMR (0.93 ± 0.31 vs. 0.86 ± 0.31, p = 0.008) compared to those with NC. Other demographic characteristic like smoking, drinking, SBP, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and regular exercise, as well as insulin therapy, metformin treatment, and medical history dates such as hypoglycemia, diabetic nephropathy and cardiovascular disease, along with laboratory indexes including TC, TG, FBG and HbA1c, showed no difference between two groups. Given the substantial differences in cognition and body composition between sexes, we further stratified the analysis by sex and cognitive status, as shown in Table 2. Among men, 173 (42.7%) subjects suffered from CI, while among women, 232 (56.3%) were affected. Notably, the difference in age and dietary between two groups was not statistically significant among men. However, male patients with CI showed a higher prevalence of smoking and a lower prevalence of metformin treatment, whereas female with CI exhibited a higher prevalence of smoking and diabetic nephropathy. As for body composition, women with CI had a lower BMI (25.88 ± 3.28 vs. 26.64 ± 2.82, p = 0.031), with a notable reduction in SMI (8.78 ± 0.89 vs. 9.03 ± 0.85, p = 0.005), while indices such as FMI and FMR did not demonstrate meaningful differences. Conversely, men with CI shown lower SMI (10.10 ± 0.93 vs. 10.36 ± 0.93, p = 0.009), higher FMI (7.42 ± 2.37vs. 6.86 ± 2.03, p = 0.018) and higher FMR (0.73 ± 0.22 vs. 0.66 ± 0.19, p = 0.001), with no significant difference observed in BMI between the groups.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chat of study participants

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics of the study population by cognition status
Full size table
Table 2 Characteristics of the study population by cognition status and sex
Full size table

Association of FMR with cognitive performance

The associations between FMR and CI in multivariate-adjusted models among men and women are presented in Table 3. Initially, in unadjusted logistic regression analyses, a significant association was observed within the male group. Even after adjusting for age and years of education, the association persisted. Furthermore, when additional adjustments were made for other demographic variables, medical history, and biochemical parameters, the significance of the association remained unchanged in male (OR: 1.175, 95% CI: 1.045–1.320, p = 0.007). To evaluate the impact of BMI on this risk relationship, we further adjusted for BMI and found that for every 0.1 increase in FMR, the risk of CI increased by 31.1%. Notably, BMI appeared to have a borderline protective effect on cognition. Conversely, among female, irrespective of the indicators adjusted, FMR consistently demonstrated no significant association with cognition. However, higher BMI levels were associated with a lower risk of CI (OR: 0.882, 95% CI: 0.805–0.967, p = 0.007).

Table 3 Logistic regression analyses of the association of FMR with CI by sex
Full size table

FMR quartile

Figure 2 illustrates a sequential increase in the prevalence of CI from the lowest to the highest quartiles of FMR in male (p < 0.05). Compared to individuals in the lowest quartile (Q1) of FMR, those in the highest quartile (Q4) exhibited a significantly elevated risk of cognitive decline in Model1 (OR: 2.178, 95% CI: 1.101–4.312, p < 0.05) (Table 4). Even after further adjusted for BMI in model 2, the highest quartile (Q4) of FMR remained associated with a significant higher risk of CI (OR: 2.980,95% CI: 1.88–7.473, p < 0.05) among males. Conversely, in the female group, irrespective of whether it was Model 1 or Model 2, there was consistently no discernible relationship between FMR and CI. However, BMI continued to exhibit a protective effect, consistent with the findings mentioned above.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Quartile of FMR and prevalence of CI in patients with T2DM

Full size image

A for male, p for trend < 0.05.B for female, p for trend ≥ 0.05.

Table 4 Logistic regression analyses of the association of FMR quartile with CI stratified by sex
Full size table

Discussion

This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the relationship between FMR and cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients with T2DM. Our findings revealed that individuals in the cognitive decline group exhibited higher FMR levels, with FMR emerging as an independent risk factor for CI among elderly men with T2DM. Notably, this association remained significant even after adjusting for potential confounders, including BMI. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the relationship between FMR and cognition in T2DM patients.

Several studies have separately investigated the relationship between fat mass, muscle mass, and the risk of CI; however, these findings are not always consistent. A prospective cohort study involving 453 patients found that the decline in SMI over time was independently associated with global cognitive decline in patients with T2DM [19]. Whereas a cross-sectional study in Japan, which included 497 patients with MCI and 684 with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), found a significant correlation between memory function and sarcopenia in women, but not in men [20]. Regarding fat mass, a study of 542 community residents aged 21 to 90 years found a significant association between obesity defined by the first two quintiles of FMI and a greater likelihood of attentional impairment (OR: 2.05, 95%CI 1.12–3.82) [21]. A study involving elderly obese veterans in Texas found that cognitive decline in older age may worsen with increased fat mass, which appears to be an important predictor of cognitive performance in this population [22]. Conversely, a study involved 5169 patients found that higher abdominal and thigh subcutaneous fat content was associated with a lower likelihood of dementia in women [23]. The reasons for these significant differences in associations are unclear. To comprehensively consider the impact of muscle mass and fat mass on cognitive function, we conducted a study on the FMR and CI.

A prospective study exploring the associations of FMR with dementia risk, regarding dementia subtypes, observed that the association between FMR and AD was significant only in men, which is consistent with this article [13]. However, studies by Ma et al. found that higher FMR was associated with a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment (OR: 1.44, 95%CI: 0.88–2.35, p for trend = 0.029), mainly occurring in women and the elderly [12]. The evidence suggests that the sex-specific effect of FMR on CI risk and the nature of this association are not fully understood. In this study, moderately high FMR was associated with an increased risk of CI in elderly men with T2DM, but not in women. In women, although there was no significant difference between FMR and CI, the BMI and SMI of cognitive decline group were shown lower. In the final model, BMI rather than FMR showed an independent association with CI, consistent with previous research findings in women. The combination of BMI and FMR may highlight the important role of simple muscle loss in female cognition. This may be related to the neuroprotective effect of muscle tissue. Based on studies of body composition index and cognition, we speculate that the aforementioned differences may be related to sex-specific differences in the effects of fat, with the cognitive harm of body fat being more pronounced in men than in women. A recent study based on diffusion-weighted imaging in the UK Biobank cohort found that body fat percentage (PBF) and white matter brain age gap (BAG) were correlated differently between genders. Greater PBF in males was linked to higher BAG, while lower PBF in females was associated with higher BAG [24]. We propose several possible biological hypotheses to explain this: First, fat accumulation in males is mainly manifested as increased visceral fat, while in females it is mainly concentrated in subcutaneous tissue [25]. Visceral adipose tissue has been shown to have higher metabolic activity than subcutaneous adipose tissue and is thought to have a stronger influence on inflammatory cytokines and insulin resistance [26]. Previous research found a direct correlation between visceral obesity, but not subcutaneous fat, and poor cognitive performance in older adults [27]. However, in this article, we did not include visceral fat area as a variable, which can be further improved in future studies. Second, female patients are generally obese, with high fat content and minimal composition change, which do not play an important role in cognitive function [8]. In addition, hormonal differences between men and women may be at the center of the story. Adipose tissue, the main source of estrogen in women after menopause, plays a protective role in cognition [28]. Unlike women, aging in men is often accompanied by decreased testosterone levels. Larger fat tissue may increase levels of aromatase, an enzyme that converts testosterone into estrogen [29]. In men, aromatase may be involved in accelerating endocrine and brain aging processes [30].

In summary, we found that muscle loss plays an important role in women. However, in men, muscle loss and fat accumulation work synergistically. Human body as a whole, with its various components interacting with each other. Some studies have proposed the definition of sarcopenic obesity (SO) as the coexistence of fat accumulation, muscle mass loss and poor function, and comprehensively studied the relationship with cognitive function [31]. Numerous studies have linked SO to severe CI, compared to obesity or sarcopenia [32]. The FMR used in this study has been proposed as a substitute for the evaluation of SO [9], and this paper is consistent with the results of previous studies. Based on the results of this study, we emphasized the difference in the role of fat between sexes and the protective effect of muscle, while also recommending monitoring the distribution of body composition in elderly diabetics and adjusting lifestyle to improve cognitive function.

The study may have several potential limitations. First, it was a cross-sectional study and because of the study design, only correlations, not causation, could be established. Although we adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and diabetes-related confounders, some factors were not included, such as the Apolipoprotein E4 gene and nutritional status. Second, we use BIA to measure body composition, rather than the gold standard dual-energy X-ray absorption method. However, BIA is closely related to dual-energy X-ray absorption method, which has been used widespread in research and shown reliability in assessing body composition. Ultimately, this was a single-center study with all participants from the same tertiary hospital in North China, so we may not generalize the results to other population groups. Further multicenter, prospective cohort studies are needed.

Conclusion

Our study underscores the independent relationship between FMR and heightened risk of CI in male patients with T2DM. Higher FMR levels were consistently linked to CI, regardless of BMI. These findings suggest that FMR could serve as a valuable metric in routine health screening and co-management strategies for T2DM patients, with the potential to mitigate the onset of CI.

Data availability

The raw data used in this study are available from the corresponding authors: JNL and JBL.

Abbreviations

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

CI:

Cognitive impairment

NC:

Normal cognitive

MCI:

Mild cognitive impairment

BMI:

Body mass index

FMR:

Fat to muscle mass ratio

WHO:

World Health Organization

BIA:

Bioelectrical impedance analysis

FMI:

Fat mass index

SMI:

Skeletal muscle mass index

MoCA:

Montreal cognitive assessment

FPG:

Fast plasma glucose

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglycerides

HbA1c:

Hemoglobin A1c

OR:

Odds ratio

95%CI:

95% confidence interval

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

PBF:

body fat percentage

BAG:

brain age gap

SO:

Sarcopenic obesity

References

  1. Jia L, Du Y, Chu L, Zhang Z, Li F, Lyu D, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(12):e661–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Frison E, Dufouil C, Helmer C, Berr C, Auriacombe S, Chêne G. Diabetes-Associated Dementia Risk and competing risk of death in the three-city study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71(4):1339–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Haroon NN, Austin PC, Shah BR, Wu J, Gill SS, Booth GL. Risk of dementia in seniors with newly diagnosed diabetes: a population-based study. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(10):1868–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Munshi MN. Cognitive dysfunction in older adults with diabetes: what a Clinician needs to know. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(4):461–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Malone JI, Hansen BC. Does obesity cause type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)? Or is it the opposite? Pediatr Diabetes. 2019;20(1):5–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mallorquí-Bagué N, Lozano-Madrid M, Toledo E, Corella D, Salas-Salvadó J, Cuenca-Royo A, et al. Type 2 diabetes and cognitive impairment in an older population with overweight or obesity and metabolic syndrome: baseline cross-sectional analysis of the PREDIMED-plus study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Noh HM, Han J, Kim YJ, Jung JH, Roh YK, Song HJ. Sex differences in the relationship between cognitive impairment and overweight or obesity in late life: a 3-year prospective study. Med (Baltim). 2019;98(9):e14736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thibeau S, McDermott K, McFall GP, Rockwood K, Dixon RA. Frailty effects on non-demented cognitive trajectories are moderated by sex and Alzheimer’s genetic risk. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11(1):55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Auyeung TW, Lee JS, Leung J, Kwok T, Woo J. Adiposity to muscle ratio predicts incident physical limitation in a cohort of 3,153 older adults–an alternative measurement of Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity. Age (Dordr). 2013;35(4):1377–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee HS, Kim SG, Kim JK, Lee YK, Noh JW, Oh J, et al. Fat-to-lean Mass ratio can predict cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Ann Nutr Metab. 2018;73(3):241–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seo YG, Song HJ, Song YR. Fat-to-muscle ratio as a predictor of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome in Korean adults. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11(3):710–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma W, Zhang H, Wu N, Liu Y, Han P, Wang F, et al. Relationship between obesity-related anthropometric indicators and cognitive function in Chinese suburb-dwelling older adults. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(10):e0258922.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang W, Luo Y, Zhuang Z, Song Z, Huang N, Li Y, et al. Total and regional fat-to-muscle mass ratio and risks of incident all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(5):2447–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15(7):539–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsoi KK, Chan JY, Hirai HW, Wong SY, Kwok TC. Cognitive tests to detect dementia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(9):1450–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jia W, Weng J, Zhu D, Ji L, Lu J, Zhou Z, et al. Standards of medical care for type 2 diabetes in China 2019. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019;35(6):e3158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. [Expert consensus of the. Diagnosis and treatment measures for the Chinese elderly patients with type 2 diabetes (2018 Edition)]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2018;57(9):626–41.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Low S, Goh KS, Ng TP, Moh A, Ang SF, Khoo J, et al. Decline in skeletal muscle mass is associated with cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications. 2022;36(9):108258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sugimoto T, Kuroda Y, Matsumoto N, Uchida K, Kishino Y, Saji N, et al. Cross-sectional associations of Sarcopenia and its components with neuropsychological performance among memory clinic patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease. J Frailty Aging. 2022;11(2):182–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Batsis JA, Haudenschild C, Roth RM, Gooding TL, Roderka MN, Masterson T, et al. Incident impaired cognitive function in sarcopenic obesity: data from the National Health and Aging trends Survey. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;22(4):865–e725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Heisey HD, Kunik ME, Qualls C, Segoviano-Escobar MB, Villareal DT. Truncal Fat and Frailty are important predictors of cognitive performance among aging adults with obesity. J Nutr Health Aging. 2022;26(5):425–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Spauwen PJ, Murphy RA, Jónsson PV, Sigurdsson S, Garcia ME, Eiriksdottir G, et al. Associations of fat and muscle tissue with cognitive status in older adults: the AGES-Reykjavik Study. Age Ageing. 2017;46(2):250–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Subramaniapillai S, Suri S, Barth C, Maximov II, Voldsbekk I, van der Meer D, et al. Sex- and age-specific associations between cardiometabolic risk and white matter brain age in the UK Biobank cohort. Hum Brain Mapp. 2022;43(12):3759–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim EH, Kim HK, Lee MJ, Bae SJ, Choe J, Jung CH, et al. Sex differences of Visceral Fat Area and visceral-to-subcutaneous Fat ratio for the risk of Incident Type 2 diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Metab J. 2022;46(3):486–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Carr DB, Utzschneider KM, Hull RL, Kodama K, Retzlaff BM, Brunzell JD, et al. Intra-abdominal fat is a major determinant of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria for the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes. 2004;53(8):2087–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yoon DH, Choi SH, Yu JH, Ha JH, Ryu SH, Park DH. The relationship between visceral adiposity and cognitive performance in older adults. Age Ageing. 2012;41(4):456–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Simpson ER. Sources of estrogen and their importance. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;86(3–5):225–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Meyer MR, Clegg DJ, Prossnitz ER, Barton M. Obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes: sex differences and role of oestrogen receptors. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2011;203(1):259–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vosberg DE, Parker N, Shin J, Pausova Z, Paus T. The genetics of testosterone contributes to femaleness/maleness of cardiometabolic traits and type 2 diabetes. Int J Obes (Lond). 2022;46(1):235–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Donini LM, Busetto L, Bischoff SC, Cederholm T, Ballesteros-Pomar MD, Batsis JA, et al. Definition and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic obesity: ESPEN and EASO Consensus Statement. Obes Facts. 2022;15(3):321–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Tolea MI, Chrisphonte S, Galvin JE. Sarcopenic obesity and cognitive performance. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:1111–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the clinical data provided by the Department of Endocrinology of the Tianjin Union Medical Center.

Funding

This work was supported by the Tianjin Science and Technology Committee (J.N.L, Grant Number 18ZXDBSY00120) and the Science and Technology Project of the Tianjin Municipal Health Commission (J.N.L, Grant Number ZD20006).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Fan Wu and Yanlan Liu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrinology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Nankai University Affiliated Hospital, Tianjin, China

    Fan Wu, Yanlan Liu, Chenying Lin, Longfei Xia, Yaoshuang Li, Tong Chen, Huina Qiu, Jingbo Li & Jingna Lin

  2. Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China

    Chenying Lin, Longfei Xia & Yaoshuang Li

  3. School of Global Health, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

    Nahal Haghbin

  4. Tianjin Union Medical Center, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China

    Tong Chen

  5. Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA

    Weiran Jiang

Authors
  1. Fan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yanlan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chenying Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nahal Haghbin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Longfei Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yaoshuang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Huina Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Weiran Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jingbo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jingna Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The project was jointly conceptualized by JB-L and JN-L, who also made significant contributions to its design and final approval of the manuscript. The statistical analysis, data visualization, and majority of the writing was performed by FW and YL-L. The interpretation of results and revision of the manuscript were undertaken by CY-L and NH. LF-X, YS-L, TC and HN-Q were instrumental in the extraction, collection, and management of data. WJ focused on statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jingbo Li or Jingna Lin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

According to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, the study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Tianjin Union Medical Center with the committee’s protocol approval number 2018(C08). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, F., Liu, Y., Lin, C. et al. Correlation between fat-to-muscle mass ratio and cognitive impairment in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 24, 352 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04941-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04941-2

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us