Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic regression analyses of the association of FMR quartile with CI stratified by sex

From: Correlation between fat-to-muscle mass ratio and cognitive impairment in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study

Quartile of FMR

Male

Female

N(range)

OR (95%CI)

N(range)

OR (95%CI)

Model 1

    

Q1

89 (< 0.55)

1(ref)

103 (< 0.90)

1(ref)

Q2

89 (0.55–0.66)

1.192 (0.634–2.240)

103 (0.90–1.04)

1.038 (0.563–1.911)

Q3

89 (0.67–0.87)

1.282 (0.682–2.411)

103 (1.05–1.23)

0.945 (0.515–1.737)

Q4

89 (≥ 0.88)

2.178 (1.101–4.312) *

103 (≥ 1.24)

0.870 (0.476–1.592)

P for trend

 

0.032*

 

0.595

Model 2

    

Q1

89 (< 0.55)

1(ref)

103 (< 0.90)

1(ref)

Q2

89 (0.55–0.66)

1.325 (0.682–2.573)

103 (0.90–1.04)

1.307 (0.686–2.491)

Q3

89 (0.67–0.87)

1.504 (0.743–3.046)

103 (1.05–1.23)

1.361 (0.686-2.700)

Q4

89 (≥ 0.88)

2.980 (1.188–7.473) *

103 (≥ 1.24)

1.684 (0.738–3.840)

P for trend

 

0.031*

 

0.241

BMI

 

0.959 (0.869–1.059)

 

0.904 (0.830–0.985) *

  1. Model 1 were adjusted for potential confounders including age, years of education, marital status, dietary control of diabetes, smoking, diabetic nephropathy, cerebrovascular disease, SBP, HbA1c, and metformin. Model 2 were further adjusted for BMI. *p < 0.05