Skip to main content

Socio-demographic and lifestyle factors associated with intrinsic capacity among older adults: evidence from India

Abstract

Background

Since the traditional models missed the possibility of formulating personalised programs centred on a person’s priorities and values, it was a pressing priority to shift from traditional disease-centred to a function-based approach of healthy ageing, which is defined as ‘the process of developing and maintaining the functional ability that enables well-being in older age’. The present study aimed to assess the prevalence of high intrinsic capacity (IC) of older adults and to examine the socio-demographic and lifestyle factors associated with IC among older adults in India.

Methods

The study utilises the individual-level data from the first wave of the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI) conducted during 2017–18. The total sample size for the present study was 24,136 older adults (11,871 males and 12,265 females) aged 60 years and above. Descriptive statistics, along with bivariate analysis, was employed to present the preliminary results. Additionally, multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted to find out the association of socio-demographic and lifestyle factors with IC and its components.

Results

The mean IC score was found to be 7.37 (SD = 1.6) in this study. A proportion of 24.56% of older adults was observed to be in the higher IC category. Increasing age was negatively associated with high IC for older men and women. Older people who smoke tobacco (β = -0.23; CI: -0.32—-0.13) and chew tobacco (β = -0.11; CI: -0.18—-0.03) were less likely to experience high IC compared to their respective counterparts. Older adults who reported episodic alcohol drinking were less likely to have high IC (β = -0.20; CI:-0.32—-0.07). The engagement in moderate physical activity (β = 0.12; CI:0.01–0.23), vigorous physical activity (β = 0.12; CI:0.05–0.20) and yoga-related activity (β = 0.18; CI:0.09–0.26) were significantly positively associated with high IC. Among the five domains of IC, education was significantly associated with higher capacity in each domain, and increasing age was found to be a significant predictor of lower capacity in each IC domain except locomotion. Older men and women engaged in vigorous physical activity had 35 and 19% significantly higher odds of high capacity in sensory (aOR = 1.35; CI: 1.12—1.62) and psychological (aOR = 1.19; CI: 1.06—1.34) domains, respectively.

Conclusions

The study revealed that lifestyle behaviours including tobacco use, episodic alcohol drinking and physical activity are strongly associated with IC among older adults in India. The findings suggest that healthy lifestyle behaviours should be encouraged among older adults as an effort to improve their IC, which is the key determinant of functional ability and quality of life in later years of life.

Peer Review reports

Background

Older adults are a rapidly growing fraction of the population worldwide [1]. The number of older adults is expected to grow exponentially to over 1.5 billion in 2050 [2]. Therefore, it is important for older adults to protect their rights to health and enjoy a good quality of life as they age. As a response to population ageing, different conceptual models such as active ageing, successful ageing or healthy ageing have been proposed to address the notion of ageing well [3]. But all these models focused on the absence of clinical diseases or the accumulation of deficits. These traditional disease-centred approaches were inadequate to address the emerging needs of the older population [4]. Since the traditional models missed the possibility of formulating personalised programs centred on a person’s priorities and values, it was a pressing priority to shift from traditional disease-centred to a function-based approach of healthy ageing, which is defined as ‘the process of developing and maintaining the functional ability that enables well-being in older age’.

In 2015, World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the novel construct of intrinsic capacity (IC) to define healthy ageing [5]. The IC refers to an individual’s physical and mental capacities that determine the functional ability of that person, which is the core of healthy ageing [1]. The introduction of the IC construct is focused at measuring the capacities rather than deficits of multiple human biological systems based on body functions which are most relevant to healthy ageing [6]. It is envisaged that a new function-based approach will help to detect geriatric conditions such as person’s fragility, care dependence and disability at the earlier stage and create opportunities for delaying and preventing such conditions. Moreover, IC has been quantified and a probable structure proposed, and it has been shown to be a strong predictor of care dependence and other health outcomes in late life [6,7,8,9].

It is relevant to identify various socio-demographic elements and modifiable risk factors which influence IC. Thus, IC can be promoted to delay or prevent adverse health events by focusing on such elements and factors. Some of the earlier studies have investigated the role of socio-demographic factors on IC [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Significantly lower IC scores were reported for older age groups, women [11, 16], and those with lower levels of education and subjective social status [8]. IC was found to be a potent mediator for the effect of age, sex, and wealth on care dependence [7]. Along with a number of correlates, northern residence and being unmarried were associated with a decline in IC in a recent Chinese study [14]. There is a lack of studies examining the impact of work status on IC, and only one study identified labour market participation as a covariate and reported a non-significant association with IC level [13]. A couple of studies have captured the positive impact of socioeconomic status on IC scores [9, 11, 14]. Household size and household consumption per capita in quantile are considered proxy measurements of socioeconomic status [14]. A few studies explained morbidity [16,17,18] and polypharmacy [12, 16, 19] as predictors of IC.

Healthy lifestyle behaviours have been consistently associated with better health outcomes in older people [20] and increase in life years spent in good health [21]. Only a few research have looked into the impact of lifestyle behaviours on IC. Mainly, smoking, drinking, physical activity(exercise), diet and nutrition intake are considered health risk behaviour factors in ageing studies. It has been observed that paying attention to one's lifestyle, such as food, exercise, not smoking or drinking excessively, and remaining mentally active, are the most effective approach to healthy ageing [22]. In the IC context, a study examined the association between dietary patterns and IC and its sub-domains in Chinese community-dwelling older adults and explored that various dietary patterns were associated with greater IC and its sub-domains in Chinese community-dwelling older adults, and more associations were observed in men than women [23]. It is also evident that less exercise and less meat intake were related to IC decline [14]. People engaging in physical activity had increased odds of higher IC and thereby enjoying healthy ageing [14, 16, 19].

Globally, studies on the IC are at the nascent stage. Currently, available studies are conducted only in a few countries. Studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries except China are scarce. Since IC is a better predictor of health outcomes [12] and a proxy measure of the quality of life [24], a country like India, witnessing rapid growth of the aged population and seeking for appropriate strategies to cope with the ageing population urgently demands studies focusing on IC which can better predict health outcome and thereby guide the development of personalised interventions which ensure the quality life of older adults. The present study aimed to compute a composite IC score in the Indian context and to examine the socio-demographic and lifestyle factors associated with IC among older adults in India. This study hypothesised that healthy lifestyle behaviours such as non-drinking, non-smoking and engagement in physical activities are positively associated with the higher IC of older adults.

Methods

Data

The present study utilises the individual-level data from the first wave of the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI) conducted during 2017–18. The LASI is a country-representative longitudinal survey of more than 72,000 adults aged 45 years and over across all states and union territories of the country that provides vital information on the social, physical, psychological, and cognitive health of the Indian aging population. The LASI survey was conducted through a partnership of the International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health (HSPH), and the University of Southern California (USC). In the LASI wave 1, the sample selection is based on a multistage stratified cluster sample design, including a three-stage sampling design in rural areas and a four-stage sampling design in urban areas. The details of sampling design, survey instruments, and data collection procedures are provided elsewhere. The present study is conducted on eligible respondents aged 60 years and above. Thus, the total sample size for the present study after dropping the missing observations of the outcome variable (n = 7,328) was 24,136 older adults (11,871 males and 12,265 females) aged 60 years and above.

Measures

Outcome variable

Intrinsic capacity (IC) as the outcome variable of this study was assessed using the criteria summarised in Table 1.

Table 1 Assessment of IC among older adults

Each of the domain was assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2, as shown in Table 1, and we summed all five domains to derive a composite score of IC ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores representing greater IC. Further, a recent study showed that every standard deviation increment in the mean IC composite score was associated with better functional ability [27]. Similarly, in this study, one standard deviation increment from the mean IC score was considered as the cut-off score for high IC among older adults during the bivariate analysis. The continuous scale of IC ranging from 0 to 10 was used in the multivariable analyses in this study.

Covariates

Socio-demographic variables included age (recoded as 60–69, 70–79 and 80 +), sex (male and female), education (recoded as none, primary, secondary and higher), marital status (recoded as married, widowed and others which included separated, divorced and never married) and work status (recoded as never worked, currently working, not working and retired).

The current tobacco smoking was sourced from the item (1) “Do you currently smoke any tobacco products (cigarettes, bidis, cigars, hookah, cheroot, etc.)?” and current smokeless tobacco use was sourced from the item (2) “Do you use smokeless tobacco (such as chewing tobacco, gutka, pan masala, etc.)?” The variables were dichotomised to yes and no, representing the current use of smoked and smokeless tobacco. Similarly, episodic alcohol drinking use was assessed with the question, “In the last 3 months, how frequently, on average, have you had at least 5 or more drinks on one occasion?”, and defined as yes if the response was “one to three days per month, one to four days per week, five or more days per week, or daily”. Moderate physical activity was measured through the question, “How often do you do activities such as cleaning house, washing clothes by hand, fetching water or wood, drawing water from a well, gardening, bicycling at a regular pace, walking at a moderate pace, dancing, floor or stretching exercises? Similarly, the question through which vigorous physical activity was assessed was “How often do you take part in sports or vigorous activities, such as running or jogging, swimming, going to a health centre or gym, cycling, or digging with a spade or shovel, heavy lifting, chopping, farm work, fast bicycling, cycling with loads”? Both the variables were dichotomised to yes (every day, more than once a week, once a week, one to three times in a month), and no (hardly ever or never). The yoga-related activity was assessed using the question, How often do you engage in the activities such as yoga, meditation, asana, pranayama or similar? The variable was dichotomised as yes (every day, more than once a week, once a week, one to three times in a month), and no (hardly ever or never).

Further, the monthly per capita consumption expenditure (MPCE) quintile was assessed using household consumption data. The details of the measure are published elsewhere. The variable was then divided into five quintiles i.e., from poorest to richest. Religion was coded as Hindu, Muslim and Others. Caste was recoded as Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (SC/ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), and others. The other caste category refers to those having higher social status, mostly belonging to upper caste categories. The place of residence was coded as urban and rural. Also, the regions of the country were coded as North, Central, East, Northeast, West, and South.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics, along with results of cross-tabulations, were reported in the study. We checked whether the IC followed a normal distribution by visual inspection with a histogram. We also computed Pearson's correlation coefficient between IC and age to explore the relationship between these measures.

Additionally, multivariable linear regression for IC score and multivariable binary logistic regressions for each component was conducted to find the association of socio-demographic and lifestyle factors with IC and its components. The estimates were presented in the form of adjusted coefficients (aCoef) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). All statistical models were adjusted for the selected background characteristics, including age, sex, education, marital status, work status, smoked and smokeless tobacco use and alcohol consumption, moderate and vigorous physical activity, yoga-related activity, MPCE quintiles, religion, caste, place of residence and regions.

The statistical analysis was performed using Stata 15.1. Survey weights were applied to account for the population level estimates. Regression diagnostics included tests for multicollinearity of predictor variables and tests for normality of residuals with variance inflation factor (VIF) and kernel density plots (Supplementary material Table S1 and Figure S1) and found no violations of basic assumptions for regression.

Results

The composite z-score of IC ranged from -4·62 to 1·65 in the study sample. Figure 1 shows the distribution of the IC composite z-score for male and female samples (histogram). Further, Fig. 2 presents the scatter plot of the age of the respondents and IC. There was a negative correlation between IC and older age among males and females (Pearson's correlation coefficient = -0.287, 95% CI: -0.303 to -0.270 among males; and -0.340, 95% CI: -0.355 to -0.324 among females).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of intrinsic capacity composite z-score for the older men and women sample (histogram)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Scatter plot showing the correlation between intrinsic capacity scores and age. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was -0.287 on 11,871 male observations (95% CI: -0.303 to -0.270) and -0.340 on 12,265 female observations (95% CI: -0.355 to -0.324), which means negative correlations between IC and age among older men and women

Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics of study participants by background characteristics. The study estimated a mean IC score of 7.37 (SD = 1.6). The proportion of the sample constituted by older men and women aged 80 plus years was 9.47 and 8.14%, respectively. 37.41% of older men and 71.25% of older women had no formal education. Of the lifestyle factors, among older men, 27.88% smoked tobacco, and 32.5% chewed tobacco; among older women, it was 3.9 and 18.19%, respectively. 10.06% of older men and 1.1% of older women reported episodic alcohol drinking. 13.23 and 43.74% of older men engaged in moderate and vigorous physical activity, respectively, whereas 7.64 and 24.21% of older women engaged in moderate and vigorous physical activity. About 17.73% of older men and 12.32% of older women engaged in the yoga-related activity. A large share of older men and women were in the union and rural residents.

Table 2 Sample distribution of older adults by background characteristics

Concerning the prevalence of high IC (Table 3), older adults aged 60–69 had a higher prevalence of high IC (male 34.34% and female 24.6%) than their senior counterparts. Older adults who do not smoke tobacco (male 31.23% and female 21.13%) and do not chew tobacco (male 30.11% and female 22.44%) had a higher prevalence of high IC. Both older males and females reported episodic alcohol drinking had a higher prevalence of high IC (male 29.89% and female 20.65%). Older males and females who engage in vigorous physical activity (male 31.23% and female 21.07%) had a higher prevalence of high IC than those who do not engage in vigorous physical activity. But the result is not significant. Older men and women who engage in moderate physical activity (male 41.54% and female34.2%) and yoga-related activity (male 40.43% and female 29.94%) had a higher prevalence of high IC than their counterparts who do not engage in moderate physical activity and yoga related activity. People with higher levels of education and belonging to higher socioeconomic groups had a higher prevalence of high IC. Compared to participants, those excluded from this study due to incomplete data tended to be older, widowed and belonging to lower socioeconomic groups (Supplementary table S1).

Table 3 Prevalence of high IC among older adults by background characteristics

Table 4 provides multivariable linear regression estimates of IC by socioeconomic and lifestyle factors among older adults in India. For older men and women, increasing age was negatively associated with high IC. People in the age group 80 + were less likely to experience high IC (β = -1.11; CI: -1.29—-0.92) than their younger counterparts. Females were also less likely to experience high IC (β = -0.17; CI: -0.25—-0.08) compared to their male counterparts. Older adults with higher levels of education (β = 0.86; CI: 0.75—0.96) were more likely to experience high IC. With regard to lifestyle factors, people who smoke tobacco (β = -0.23; CI: -0.32—-0.13) and chew tobacco (β = -0.11; CI: -0.18—-0.03) were less likely to experience high IC compared to their respective counterparts. Older adults who reported episodic alcohol drinking was less likely to have high IC (β = -0.20; CI:-0.32—-0.07). The engagement in moderate physical activity (β = 0.12; CI:0.01–0.23), vigorous physical activity (β = 0.12; CI:0.05–0.20) and yoga-related activity (β = 0.18; CI:0.09–0.26) were significantly positively associated with high IC. Furthermore, older individuals who were widowed, residing in rural areas, belonging to households of SC/ST groups and the poorest wealth quintile were less likely to experience high IC.

Table 4 Multivariable linear regression estimates (adjusted coefficients) of IC by socioeconomic and lifestyle factors among older adults

Table 5 shows adjusted odds ratios from logistic regression of each component of IC by socioeconomic and lifestyle factors among older adults. Among the five domains of IC, education was significantly associated with higher capacity in each domain, and increasing age was found to be a significant predictor of lower capacity in each IC domain except locomotion. Older females had lower odds of high capacity in each IC domain except the vitality domain. Older females had 73% (aOR = 1.73; CI: 1.47—2.04) significantly higher odds of higher capacity in the vitality domain. Sex difference in the psychological domain was not statistically significant. It was also revealed that older adults who reported episodic alcohol drinking had lower odds (aOR = 0.59; CI: 0.48—0.74) of high cognitive capacity. Older adults who engaged in yoga-related activity had 32% (aOR = 1.32; CI: 1.10—1.57) significantly higher odds of high cognitive capacity. It is also observed that older adults who smoked tobacco (aOR = 0.60; CI: 0.48—0.75), chewed tobacco (aOR = 0.82; CI: 0.71—0.96) and consumed alcohol (aOR = 0.68; CI: 0.54—0.86) had lower odds of high capacity in vitality domain. Also, older adults engaged in yoga-related activity had 25% (aOR = 1.25; CI: 1.07—1.47) significantly higher odds of having high capacity in the vitality domain. Engagement in vigorous physical activity is significantly associated with lower vitality capacity (aOR = 0.88; CI: 0.76—1.01). Interestingly, lifestyle factors had no significant impact on the locomotion domain. Older men and women engaged in vigorous physical activity had 35 and 19% significantly higher odds of high capacity in sensory (aOR = 1.35; CI: 1.12—1.62) and psychological (aOR = 1.19; CI: 1.06—1.34) domains, respectively. Other lifestyle factors had no significant association with the capacity of sensory and psychological domains.

Table 5 Adjusted odds ratios from logistic regression of each components of IC by socioeconomic and lifestyle factors among older adults

Discussion

The present study aimed to understand the prevalence of higher IC among older adults and to explore the socio-demographic and lifestyle factors, including tobacco use, episodic alcohol consumption and physical activity, associated with IC by analysing a large sample of older adults in India. This population-based study observed a mean IC score of 7.37 on a scale of 1–10, which was consistent with a recent study reporting that, on average, the Indian older population is slightly healthier, with a mean Healthy Ageing Index of 81.4 out of 100 [28]. The study analysing the status of perceived quality of life of older adults in India also highlighted that the overall quality of life of older people in India ranged from good to excellent even though there is a variation on the basis of socioeconomic characteristics [29].

On the contrary, the finding suggests that only a tiny proportion of older adults (24.56%) were enjoying higher IC. Studies conducted in LMICs also reported the higher prevalence of declining ICs in those country contexts [11, 13, 30]. The study shows a negative relationship between increasing age and IC among older adults, which is consistent with the result of a recent study on IC in the Chinese context [14]. This is also in line with earlier findings that as people get older, they are more likely to have functional decline and neurological or degenerative chronic conditions [31,32,33]. It was also observed that increasing age was a significant predictor of lower capacity in each IC domain except psychology, in concordance with the finding of recent studies conducted among Indian older adults, which found that as age increased, functional ability and psychological well-being decreased [34,35,36].

The findings based on the sex-stratified analysis underlines the gender gap in IC scores, with female older adults having lower IC scores than their male counterparts, which is consistent with the previous research finding [11]. The gender gap may root in differences in chronic conditions and the complex interplay between behavioural, pathological and environmental factors. In addition, females reported lower capacity in all sub-domains of IC except sensory. No significant gender gap was observed in sensory domain. Female disadvantages can be explained on the basis of ‘sensitivity theory’, which proposes that men and women are susceptible to the effects of health-related variables in different ways and ‘exposure theory’, which hypothesises a disparity in exposure to health determinants between men and women [37]. Generally, it is believed that men live shorter but healthier lives than women, who live longer but are in poorer health [38]. Also, growing literature has revealed that women have greater overall rates of physical disease, more disability days, and more doctor visits, hospital stays despite having lower mortality rates at practically every age than men do [38].

The present study further highlights that currently being in a marital union and living arrangement with spouse and children act as a protective factor against IC decline and is consistent with the findings of earlier studies that stressed on marriage as protection against adverse health outcomes through changing health behaviours and social networks originating from the union [39,40,41]. Multiple studies in demographic research have found that married people had better health and lower mortality than unmarried people [42, 43]. Previous studies in the Indian context with cross-sectional nature have also established the significance of marital status on health outcomes and emphasised that widowed status is linked to poorer mental and physical health [44,45,46]. With regard to living arrangements, it was already demonstrated that living with a spouse only and solitary living were closely associated with short-term morbidity [47].

Furthermore, findings of our study highlight the importance of maintaining healthy lifestyle behaviours for improving late-life functional capacity. The study found that engagement in moderate or vigorous physical activity acts as a catalyst for higher IC among older people. The positive impact of physical activity on IC was already confirmed in previous studies [14, 16, 19]. Physical activity was found to be the most effective preventative intervention in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction, physical frailty, disability, and risk of falls and fractures [30, 48]. Notably, the findings suggest that yoga-related activities are positively associated with IC among older Indian adults. In a narrative review on physical activity and mental health in India, exercise and yoga were found to be useful in lowering mean scores for both severe and common mental disorders, and yoga had a greater impact on schizophrenia patients than either exercise or no intervention [49].

It is also evident from the multivariate analysis that health risk behaviours such as tobacco use and episodic alcohol consumption adversely affected the IC score of the study population. This evidence was consistent with the earlier study findings that healthy lifestyle behaviours have been linked to improved health outcomes in older adults [20]. In the Indian context, it was already verified that older adults who smoked tobacco and who consumed alcohol had a considerably increased risk of having cognitive damage [50] and a higher prevalence of multimorbidity [51]. With regard to the effect of smoking, an indirect relationship between smoking and body weight has been observed in studies [52, 53]. The review analysing the consequences of cigarette smoking and nicotine on the behavioural, sensory, and metabolic systems of the human body explained the mechanism by which smoking may alter weight [54]. As documented, paying attention to one's lifestyle, such as food, exercise, not smoking or drinking excessively, and remaining mentally active, may be the most efficient way to healthy ageing [1, 22].

The social gradient in IC is evident from the analysis. That is, lower IC scores were associated with lower educational attainment or a lower economic condition. Consistent with the literature on IC, the study observed that people with secondary or higher education were more likely to report higher IC scores than their counterparts with primary or no education [8, 9, 11, 55, 56]. The connection between increasing educational attainment and improved health is well documented across different disciplines [57]. A possible justification for the relationship between higher educational level and higher IC score can be given by the ‘brain reserve hypothesis’, which states that more years of education implies more cognitive capacity [58, 59]. The finding also verifies the empirical evidence from the Indian studies on the positive effects of higher education on quality of life and physical health of older people [60, 61]. Moreover, education was found to be a significant predictor of higher capacity in each sub-domain of IC. Further, our analysis underlined the strong positive association of economic status in terms of wealth quintiles and work status with higher IC. The direct association of economic status with IC has also been observed in previous studies [11, 14].

Regarding work status, higher IC was reported for people who were retired or currently working. Studies exploring the link between labour market participation and IC are scarce in the literature. This needs to be further investigated. The study also found that people residing in rural areas were more likely to report lower IC compared to urban people. This rural disadvantage corroborates the findings of earlier studies on the rural–urban disparity in resource availability, quality of life, health perception, physical and psychological health and successful aging among older adults in India [62,63,64,65]. The reason for rural–urban differentials in health-related variables can be rooted in their lower education and lower economic status [66]. There is a shortage of studies investigating the connection between IC and place of residence as well as regional variations. Future studies can be directed towards these aspects.

Implications of the current findings

The present study has implications in societies where population ageing is taking place, and healthy ageing policies are a major concern. As the current study suggested, priority must be given to the oldest-old, female, illiterate and rural residing people who are more vulnerable to lower IC when formulating healthy ageing policies. The study also implies that focusing on sex-specific strategies would be highly effective in geriatric health interventions. In addition, to enhance IC and thereby optimise functional abilities in late life, modifiable risk factors such as tobacco use, alcohol consumption and physical inactivity should be targeted. Governement should implement measures such as higher taxation on tobacco products and alcohol and an advertisement ban for intimidating use of such substances.

Also, it would be highly beneficial if older people were made aware of the importance of engaging in regular physical activity and exercise to stay healthy and productive. Promotion of yoga and exercise, encouragement to join small walking groups, organisation of fitness classes for senior citizens etc. can be effective moves in this respect. Moreover, the provision of nutrition supplements, the inclusion of fruits and vegetables in daily diets etc., can also be emphasised in healthy lifestyle behaviours, which are associated with better health outcomes and an increase in the number of years spent in good health [20, 21].

Limitations and strengths

Our study has certain limitations. Firstly, sensory and psychological domains were measured using self-reported indicators, which may adhere to reporting and recall biases. Secondly, due to the cross-sectional nature of data, it is difficult to sufficiently ascertain the observed relationships between IC and its predictors. In order to overcome this limitation, future studies of longitudinal nature are recommended. Thirdly, we have excluded certain components like grip strength and sleep disturbance in IC construction. In future studies, IC can be modified, including such components. Importantly, the current analysis dropped a proportion of the sample due to incomplete information on IC components. The significance tests of differences in the included and excluded sample showed that the missing cases include people from higher age group, females, widowed and those who are socioeconomically poor. This might negatively influene the generalizability of the current findings. Also, the cut-off point for higher IC as one standard deviation from the mean IC score should be investigated further and validated in specific socio-cultural settings. Lastly, even though we have included maximum potential confounders in our study, there are still some context-specific confounders like health-seeking behaviour and health-related variables like multimorbidity and perceived health status out of our consideration. Such factors should be taken into account in further studies.

Despite these limitations, the study is unique in several aspects. Firstly, it is the pioneer study assessing IC among older adults in the Indian context. Secondly, the study specifically explored the impact of lifestyle behaviours on IC. Only a few studies are available examining the association of lifestyle factors with IC [14, 23, 67]. Thirdly, the study carefully accounted for the impact of maximum potential confounders, including work participation and place of residence, which are ignored in most of the studies. Fourthly, most of the components of IC domains except sensory and psychological domains are either performance-based measures or anthropometric measures, which are free from reporting and recalling biases. Lastly and most importantly, our study is based on a large nationally representative sample of older adults in India which allow the generalizability of the findings.

Conclusion

The study revealed that lifestyle behaviours, including tobacco use, episodic alcohol drinking and physical activity, are strongly associated with IC among older adults in India. The findings have more significant implications for geriatric health care and healthy ageing policy formulation in India and other LMICs with comparable demographic and socio-economic transitional phases. The current findings also suggest that healthy lifestyle behaviours should be encouraged among older adults to improve their IC, which is the crucial determinant of functional abilities and quality of life in later years of life.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the IIPS data repository and accessible on reasonable request through

The administrative permission was obtained from the International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai for using the data for the current analysis.

References

  1. Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, et al. The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet (London, England). 2016;387:2145–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World B. World Population Ageing 2019. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peterson JR, Baumgartner DA, Austin SL. Healthy ageing in the far North: perspectives and prescriptions. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2020;79:1735036.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Belloni G, Cesari M. Frailty and INTRINSIC CAPACITY: TWO DISTINCT BUT RELATED CONSTRUCTS. Front Med. 2019;6:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Organization WH. World report on ageing and health. Geneva PP - Geneva: World Health Organization.

  6. Cesari M, De Carvalho IA, Thiyagarajan JA, et al. Evidence for the domains supporting the construct of intrinsic capacity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018;73:1653–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beard JR, Jotheeswaran AT, Cesari M, et al. The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing. BMJ Open. 2019;9: e026119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu R, Thiyagarajan JA, Leung J, et al. Validation of the construct of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal Chinese Cohort. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging. 2021;25:808–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beard JR, Si Y, Liu Z, et al. Intrinsic capacity: validation of a new who concept for healthy aging in a longitudinal Chinese study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022;77:94–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu R, Leung J, Leung G, et al. Towards healthy ageing: using the concept of intrinsic capacity in frailty prevention. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging. 2022;26:30–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, García-Chanes RE, Pérez-Zepeda MU. Allostatic load as a biological substrate to intrinsic capacity: a secondary analysis of CRELES. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging. 2019;23:788–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu S, Yu X, Wang X, et al. Intrinsic capacity predicts adverse outcomes using integrated care for older people screening tool in a senior community in Beijing. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021;94: 104358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, García-Chanes RE, Pérez-Zepeda MU. Screening intrinsic capacity and its epidemiological characterization: a secondary analysis of the Mexican health and aging study. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021;45:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma L, Chhetri JK, Zhang L, et al. Cross-sectional study examining the status of intrinsic capacity decline in community-dwelling older adults in China: prevalence, associated factors and implications for clinical care. BMJ Open. 2021;11: e043062.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JQ, Ding YY, Latib A, et al. INtrinsic Capacity and its RElAtionship with Life-SpacE Mobility (INCREASE): a cross-sectional study of community-dwelling older adults in Singapore. BMJ Open. 2021;11:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma L, Liu P, Zhang Y, et al. High serum tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 levels are related to risk of low intrinsic capacity in elderly adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25:416–8.

  17. Stephens C, Allen J, Keating N, et al. Neighborhood environments and intrinsic capacity interact to affect the health-related quality of life of older people in New Zealand. Maturitas. 2020;139:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao J, Chhetri JK, Chang Y, et al. Intrinsic capacity vs. multimorbidity: a function-centered construct predicts disability better than a disease-based approach in a community-dwelling older population cohort. Front Med. 2021;8:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma L, Zhang Y, Liu P, et al. Plasma N-terminal Pro-B-Type natriuretic peptide is associated with intrinsic capacity decline in an older population. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging. 2021;25:271–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Willcox B. Successful aging: Is there hope? CMAJ. 2012;184:1973–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Stenholm S, Head J, Kivimaki M, et al. Smoking, physical inactivity and obesity as predictors of healthy and disease-free life expectancy between ages 50 and 75: a multicohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45:1260–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Watson R. Research into ageing and older people. J Nurs Manag. 2008;16:99–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yeung SSY, Sin D, Yu R, et al. Dietary patterns and intrinsic capacity in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2022;26:174–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma L, Chhetri JK, Zhang Y, et al. Integrated care for older people screening tool for measuring intrinsic capacity: preliminary findings from ICOPE pilot in China. Front Med. 2020;7:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Crimmins EM, Kim JK, Langa KM, et al. Assessment of cognition using surveys and neuropsychological assessment: the health and retirement study and the aging, demographics, and memory study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011;66:i162–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tay L, Tay E-L, Mah SM, et al. Association of intrinsic capacity with frailty, physical fitness and adverse health outcomes in community-dwelling older adults. J Frailty Aging. 2022;1–9.

  27. Aliberti MJR, Bertola L, Szlejf C, et al. Validating intrinsic capacity to measure healthy aging in an upper middle-income country: Findings from the ELSI-Brazil. Lancet Regional Health Am. 2022;12: 100284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Irshad CV, Dash U, Muraleedharan VR. Healthy ageing in india; a quantile regression approach. J Popul Ageing. 2022;15:217–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shah VR, Christian DS, Prajapati AC, et al. Quality of life among elderly population residing in urban field practice area of a tertiary care institute of Ahmedabad city, Gujarat. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2017;6:101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Blancafort Alias S, Cuevas-Lara C, Martínez-Velilla N, et al. A multi-domain group-based intervention to promote physical activity, healthy nutrition, and psychological wellbeing in older people with losses in intrinsic capacity: AMICOPE development study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:5979.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Niti M, Ng T, Kua EH, et al. Depression and chronic medical illnesses in Asian older adults: the role of subjective health and functional status. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;22:1087–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Srivastava S, Muhammad T, Paul R, et al. Multivariate decomposition analysis of sex differences in functional difficulty among older adults based on longitudinal ageing study in India, 2017–2018. BMJ Open. 2022;12: e054661.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharma P, Maurya P, Muhammad T. Number of chronic conditions and associated functional limitations among older adults: cross-sectional findings from the longitudinal aging study in India. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Muhammad T, Meher T. Association of late-life depression with cognitive impairment: evidence from a cross-sectional study among older adults in India. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Muhammad T, Hossain B, Das A, et al. Relationship between handgrip strength and self-reported functional difficulties among older Indian adults: the role of self-rated health. Expl Gerontol. 2022;111833.

  36. Muhammad T, Maurya P. Relationship between handgrip strength, depression and cognitive impairment among older adults in India: Evidence from LASI. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022;37(8).

  37. Denton M, Prus S, Walters V. Gender differences in health: a Canadian study of the psychosocial, structural and behavioural determinants of health. Soc Sci Med. 1982;2004(58):2585–600.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mascitelli L, Pezzetta F, Sullivan JL. Why women live longer than men: sex differences in longevity. Gend Med. 2006;3:341 author.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Verbrugge LM. Marital status and health. J Marriage Fam. 1979;1:267–85.

  40. Muhammad T, Maurya P. Social support moderates the association of functional difficulty with major depression among community-dwelling older adults: evidence from LASI, 2017–18. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22:317.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Muhammad T, Balachandran A, Srivastava S. Socio-economic and health determinants of preference for separate living among older adults: a cross-sectional study in India. PLoS ONE. 2021;16: e0249828.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hu Y, Goldman N. Mortality differentials by marital status: an international comparison. Demography. 1990;27:233–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Farr W. Influence of marriage on the mortality of the French people. London: Savill & Edwards; 1859.

  44. Sudha S, Suchindran C, Mutran EJ, et al. Marital status, family ties, and self-rated health among elders in South India. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2006;21:103–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Perkins JM, Lee H young, James KS, et al. Marital status, widowhood duration, gender and health outcomes: a cross-sectional study among older adults in India. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Srivastava S, Debnath P, Shri N, et al. The association of widowhood and living alone with depression among older adults in India. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Samanta T, Chen F, Vanneman R. Living arrangements and health of older adults in India. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015;70:937–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kumar M, Srivastava S, Muhammad T. Relationship between physical activity and cognitive functioning among older Indian adults. Sci Rep. 2022;12:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cherubal AG, Suhavana B, Padmavati R, et al. Physical activity and mental health in India: a narrative review. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2019;65:656–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Muhammad T, Govindu M, Srivastava S. Relationship between chewing tobacco, smoking, consuming alcohol and cognitive impairment among older adults in India: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mishra VK, Srivastava S, Muhammad T, et al. Population attributable risk for multimorbidity among adult women in India: do smoking tobacco, chewing tobacco and consuming alcohol make a difference? PLoS ONE. 2021;16:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Klesges RC, Meyers AW, Klesges LM, et al. Smoking, body weight, and their effects on smoking behavior: a comprehensive review of the literature. Psychol Bull. 1989;106:204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lu W, Pikhart H, Sacker A. Domains and measurements of healthy aging in epidemiological studies: a review. Gerontologist. 2019;59:e294–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wack JT, Rodin J. Smoking and its effects on body weight and the systems of caloric regulation. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;35(2):366–80.

  55. Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, García-Chanes RE, González-Bautista E, et al. Validation of two intrinsic capacity scales and its relationship with frailty and other outcomes in mexican community-dwelling older adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25:33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zeng X, Shen S, Xu L, et al. The impact of intrinsic capacity on adverse outcomes in older hospitalized patients: a one-year follow-up study. Gerontology. 2021;67:267–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hamad R, Elser H, Tran DC, et al. How and why studies disagree about the effects of education on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of compulsory schooling laws. Soc Sci Med. 1982;2018(212):168–78.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Foubert-Samier A, Catheline G, Amieva H, et al. Education, occupation, leisure activities, and brain reserve: a population-based study. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33:423-e15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sharma D, Mazta SR, Parashar A. Prevalence of cognitive impairment and related factors among elderly: a population-based study. J Dr NTR Univ Health Sci. 2013;2:171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Devraj S, D’mello MK. Determinants of quality of life among the elderly population in urban areas of Mangalore, Karnataka. J Geriatr Ment Health. 2019;6:94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ghosh D, Dinda S. Determinants of the quality of life among elderly: comparison between China and India. Int J Community Soc Dev. 2020;2:71–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Usha VK, Lalitha K. Quality of life of senior citizens: a rural-urban comparison. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 2016;32:158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Bhargavi Y. Quality of life of senior citizens: a rural-urban comparison. International Journal of Scientific Development and Research. 2021:6(2).

  64. Muhammad T, Srivastava S, Hossain B, et al. Decomposing rural–urban differences in successful aging among older Indian adults. Sci Rep. 2022;12:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Srivastava S, Muhammad T. Rural-urban differences in food insecurity and associated cognitive impairment among older adults: findings from a nationally representative survey. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Banerjee S. Determinants of rural-urban differential in healthcare utilization among the elderly population in India. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Prince MJ, Acosta D, Guerra M, et al. Intrinsic capacity and its associations with incident dependence and mortality in 10/66 dementia research group studies in Latin America, India, and China: a population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2021;18:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai for providing the LASI dataset for undertaking the current study.

Funding

No funding was received for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceived and designed the research paper: KM, TM and AS; analysed the data: TM; Contributed agents/materials/analysis tools: KM and AS; Wrote the manuscript: KM and TM; Refined the manuscript: KM, TM and AS. All authors read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Muhammad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The data is freely available in the public domain and survey agencies that conducted the field survey for the data collection have collected informed consent “oral consent or signed consent” from the respondent. The study was approved by the ethics committee or Institutional review board of The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR).

All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) under the Human Protection Protocol.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1. 

Differences in socio-demographic characteristics of included and excluded sample in the study. Table S2. VIF estimates for the selected explanatory variables. Figure S1. Kernel density plot showing the normality of residuals.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muneera, K., Muhammad, T. & Althaf, S. Socio-demographic and lifestyle factors associated with intrinsic capacity among older adults: evidence from India. BMC Geriatr 22, 851 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03558-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03558-7

Keywords