Skip to main content

Older adults’ facial characteristics compared to young adults’ in correlation with edentulism: a cross sectional study



Facial ageing is a result of superficial wrinkling combined with changes to the underlying soft tissues and skeleton. The influence of tooth loss, as a geriatric characteristic, on facial appearance is still poorly explained. The aim was to evaluate the facial characteristics of older adults, correlate these characteristics with the dentition and make comparisons with young adults using a non-invasive 3D methodology.


90 participants older than 65 years, classified into 3 subgroups (edentulous, partially edentulous, toothed) and 30 young adults were evaluated. Their faces were scanned with an optical Artec 3D-scanner. Cephalometric analyses were made using the RapidForm computer program. An independent t-test and ANOVA were used for the comparisons. Pairwise, post-hoc tests were applied with respect to the significant differences (P < 0.05).


The faces of older adults are wider and longer because of the longer middle facial height. Older adults also have a longer upper lip, a larger nose, a smaller nasolabial angle (due to the nasal ptosis), narrower upper- and lower-lip vermilions and larger facial and lower-facial-height angles, resulting in a flat facial profile.

The facial changes due to ageing are the most pronounced in the edentulous. In comparison with the toothed, they have a smaller facial height due to the smaller lower facial height, larger nasolabial angle, smaller mouth width, shorter upper lip and narrower lip vermilions. Their profile is flatter and their lips are more retruded.


The proportions of the whole face are changed in older adults and they are the most expressed when this is combined with tooth loss.

Peer Review reports


The face is the most important part of the human body in the psychosocial sense. The negative impacts of exposure to the sun, smoking and a low BMI with respect to facial ageing are known and do not correspond with a high social status, a low depression score and being married, which are associated with a younger look [1]. The influence of tooth loss as a geriatric characteristic on facial appearance and the psychosocial consequences are still poorly explained. Older people perceive oral health as being important to the quality of their lives in a variety of different ways, and facial appearance, rather than eating and comfort, was the most important factor [2]. Geriatric dental medicine has been focused on maintaining and restoring good oral function. Nowadays, when life expectancy is increasing, age discrimination related to older people’s appearance is also increasing [3].

Dental caries and periodontal disease are the main causative factors of tooth loss and, eventually, if untreated, lead to edentulism [4]. In the older population, systemic diseases such as osteoporosis, sarcopenic dysphagia and malnutrition are influencing the pathological mechanisms, resulting in an increasing risk of tooth loss [5, 6]. Another important factor are diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, right-brain stroke and others, where maintaining good oral hygiene is challenging [7, 8]. Tooth loss and inadequate oral hygiene have a positive impact on frailty, which is a highly prevalent condition in the elderly and has been considered as a crucial public-health issue [5, 9]. Poor oral health is a risk factor for nutritional status and is associated with a low oral-health-related quality of life [10, 11].

Facial ageing represents the transition from youth, where there is an optimal relationship between the bone morphology and the volume of the soft-tissue envelope, to the imbalances between these components that lead to the stigma of an aged face [12]. This is the result of both superficial textural wrinkling of the skin and changes to the three-dimensional (3D) topography of the underlying structures, both the soft-tissue envelope and the underlying facial skeleton [13], which is important for the overall facial 3D contour and suspension of the soft tissues.

The irreversible alveolar ridge resorption of both jaws follows the loss of teeth, while the mean number of lost teeth increases with age [14]. The loss of incisors and canines generally results in a concave facial profile [15], while the reduced height of the tooth crown due to attrition strongly affects the aesthetics of the mouth.

The loss of supporting bones and teeth strongly influences the covering soft tissues and leads to the formation of wrinkles and compensatory mechanisms of the mimic muscles [16]. Senile ptosis of the upper eyelid and inferiorly movement of the eyebrows leads to a prolongation of the upper-face third [17]. Soft-tissue changes in the middle facial third are dropping the line between the cheek and the lower eyelid, and leading to the presence of medial fat pads in the malar area. The prolongation of the nose is a result of a smaller nasolabial angle and ptosis of the tip of the nose [18]. The most obvious changes to the lower facial third are due to the resorption of jaws and face sagging. The upper lip lengthens and sags, while the lower lip becomes shorter [19]. The lip vermilions become narrower, due to the resorption of the upper and lower jaws, the atrophy of the orbicularis oris muscle and their inversion [20]. Typically, there is a formation of the chin ptosis and jowl [21], the appearance of the nasolabial fold [22] and the depression of mouth commissures.

So far there is no reliable study that would determine the influence of edentulism on the facial appearance of older adults. The aim of our research was to objectively evaluate the characteristics of older adults’ faces in correlation with dentition and compare them with the young adults’ faces using a non-invasive 3D methodology.


The study included 90 participants older than 65 years (41 males and 49 females) and 30 controls (15 young males and 15 young females). The inclusion criteria were no craniofacial anomaly, no history of major facial trauma, no history of plastic or orthognathic surgery, no facial paresis and no tremor. Male participants with facial hair were excluded to avoid artefacts. The older adults were classified into three subgroups. The first subgroup consisted of completely edentulous participants (15 males and 15 females), the second subgroup consisted of partially edentulous participants (13 males and 17 females) and the third subgroup were toothed participants (13 males and 17 females). The edentulous subgroup contained participants who had lost all their teeth at least 5 years previously (men, 21 ± 9 years, women, 22 ± 12 years). In the partially edentulous subgroup, there were participants with 5 or more teeth. They had unstable occlusion, the intecuspal position was not repeatable and the vertical dimension of the occlusion was not maintained. The average number of teeth in the partially edentulous women was 11 ± 5 teeth and in the partially edentulous men, 9 ± 4 teeth. Two-thirds of these teeth were in the intercanine region and one-third in the transcanine region. The missing teeth were not replaced with fixed prosthodontics, but the participants had partial dentures, which were removed during the scanning. In the toothed subgroup were participants with a stable occlusion, a repeatable intecuspal position and the vertical dimension of the occlusion was maintained. They had all their teeth in the intercanine region and 3 or more functional dental units of posterior teeth. A premolar in occlusal contact was counted as 1 occlusal unit and the whole molar crown in the occlusal contact was counted as 2 occlusal units. They had no removable dentures. The subjects in the control group had complete dentition with second molars. A flowchart with the composition of the groups is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart showing composition of the groups

The 3D facial scans were obtained from all the participants using an Artec 3D scanner, which uses the flying-triangulation method for the surface scanning [23]. It is a safe, non-invasive and repeatable method [24]. Before the study, the intra-rater reliability was verified with an intraclass correlation and we proved that the method is reliable and that it does not introduce any bias.

During the image acquisition, special attention was given to positioning the participant and relaxing the facial musculature. The participants were sat in a relaxed posture with a natural head position, looking to the front with a relaxed mouth-closed position (without contractions of the mouth muscles). The instructions were to not to swallow and keep both eyes open during the acquisition of the image, which took less than 10 seconds. The natural position of the head was achieved by moving it up and down a few times and then stopping the movement and looking into the distance. The relaxed mouth-closed position was achieved with repeated wide opening and closing of the mouth until light contact of the lips was achieved. All dentures were removed from the mouth.

The 3D surface images were then further processed using Artec Studio software to obtain 3D scans in STL format. A subsequent analysis was then conducted using the computer program RapidForm 2006 (INUS Technology Inc.). The 3D cephalometric analyses of 39 superficial facial landmarks were determined on 3D facial scans (Table 1 and Fig. 2). The coordinates of the points (x,y,z) were imported into Microsoft Excel to calculate the values of the different parameters.

Table 1 List of facial landmarks (cephalometric points) used in the analyses
Fig. 2
figure 2

3D facial surface model with the 39 superficial facial landmarks (cephalometric points) used in the analyses

The distances, lines, angles and ratios determined by the cephalometric landmarks are presented in Figs. 3 and 4. The values of the observed changes and parameters were exported to Excel and SPSS (version number: 18) for further analyses. An independent t-test was used to compare the average values of the parameters between the older adults and the control group, separately for men and women. We compared the average values of the parameters for the three different subgroups and the control group as well as between the three subgroups using analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistics. If the differences between the subgroups were significant, we applied pairwise, post-hoc tests with an appropriate multiple-comparison correction. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Facial distances on the 3D facial surface model. Left: Facial widths; facial width (blue), mouth width (red). In the middle: Facial heights; facial height (purple), middle facial height (blue), lower facial height (red), nose height (green), upper-lip height (yellow). Right: Facial distances in profile; distance between upper lip and E line (pink) and lower lip and E line (light blue)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Facial angles on 3D facial surface model. Left: facial angle (dark blue), angle of lower facial height (red). Right: soft-tissue ANB angle (pink), nasolabial angle (dark blue)


In this study 90 participants (41 males with average age 74.5 ± 8 years, 49 females with average age 78.1 ± 9 years) were included in the experimental group and 30 participants (15 males with average age 24.6 ± 2 years, 15 females, 24.0 ± 2 years) were in the control group. The average body-mass index (BMI) of the older adults was 27.2 in the male group and 26.6 in the female group. In the control group the BMIs were significantly lower (24.2 in the male group and 20.3 in the female group). The sex, age and BMI of the participants in the three research subgroups and the control group are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Basic descriptive statistics of the study sample: number (N), average age in years with standard deviation (SD), median age and average body-mass index (BMI) with standard deviation (SD) for both sexes

The facial width of the older adults was larger in both sexes compared to the control group. The difference in the male group was statistically significant (p = 0.001), and close to statistical significance (p = 0.071) in the female group. The older adults had longer faces than the control group, and statistically significant (p = 0.000) in the male group. They had a longer middle facial height in comparison to the control group, statistically significant only in the male group (p = 0.010) and a larger lower facial height than the controls. Facial height and lower facial height were significantly smaller in the completely edentulous subgroup than in the toothed subgroup for both sexes.

The completely edentulous participants of both sexes had statistically significant narrower mouths than the toothed. The upper-lip height was longer in the group of older adults, and close to statistical significance in the male group (p = 0.072). The upper- and lower-lip rednesses were statistically significantly narrower in the group of older adults for both sexes, while the completely edentulous subgroup had the narrowest rednesses,

Older men had statistically significant longer noses than the young adults, but no statistical significance was found in the female group (p = 0.084).

Older adults, especially the completely and partially edentulous, had statistically significant longer distances between the upper and lower lips and the E-line. They had a statistically significant (p = 0.000) larger facial angle than the young adults. The largest facial angle was found for the completely edentulous participants, and this is statistically significant for the females.

The soft-tissue ANB angle was significantly (p = 0.000) smaller in the group of older adults in comparison with the control group.

The lower facial height angle was significantly greater in the group of older adults. We found a smaller nasolabial angle in the group of older adults, but it was not statistically significant.

A summary of the mean values and their SDs for the observed parameters of both sexes are presented in Table 3. The results of the statistical comparison of the subgroups are presented in Table 4.

Table 3 Mean values and their standard deviations (in brackets) for the observed parameters of the females and males
Table 4 Statistical comparison of the differences between the groups (P values) in the female and male samples


The face is one of the most diverse parts of the human body. The various races, ethnic origins, sexes and ages are reflected in the faces of everybody. In today’s society, which puts an emphasis on general social acceptance and the associated aesthetics, the appearance of the face has an important role. On the other hand, the influence of tooth loss on facial appearance is still very poorly explained. Recognizing the characteristics of an older adult’s face and being able to differentiate between the changes as a result of an ageing face or as a result of tooth loss have a large impact on treatment planning. 3D facial analysis is not involved in the standard diagnostic procedures for dental treatment. However, diagnostics of the whole face is possible with a 3D scan of the facial surface. The cephalometric analysis of a 3D scan is now a well-established and proven method in many fields of head and neck medicine; it was used in a study evaluating facial characteristics after two different types of prosthodontic rehabilitation [25].

Our study involved 18 cephalometric parameters based on 39 facial landmarks associated with the older and young adults. The inclusion criterion was 65 years and older, since this is the definition of an older adult. At the same time, the main skeletal changes happen before that age, between the 4th and 5th decades [26]. The males and females were examined separately, because of the sexual dimorphism [27]. Since the participants had been edentulous for more than 20 years, the major part of alveolar bone loss due to atrophy had already occurred.

When comparing the older and younger adults we had to take into account the difference in body mass index (BMI); the older adults had significantly higher BMIs than the younger ones, but there were no obese subjects among them. There were no differences in BMIs between our subgroups of old adults and there were no differences regarding the sex in the group of old adults. Also, it is known that, for example, high-BMI-conditioned changes to the face are ethnically and racially conditioned [28]. So we have to state that in our study all the participants were Slovenian with Caucasian ancestry.

Different studies have shown that the face becomes wider with age [29]. In our case, the facial width was greater in both sexes compared to the control group. Wider faces of the older adults could also be a consequence of the higher BMI in this group, because the influence of BMI on transverse facial dimensions has been proven [30]. We assumed that the loss of teeth had no great impact on the facial width, but surprisingly our study indicated narrower faces for the completely edentulous participants, most probably as a consequence of cheek soft-tissue ptosis.

Among the facial heights we excluded the parameter known as the upper facial height, because of the large variability in the position of the trichion point, especially in the male group. Some studies found that the total facial height increases with age and the same was observed in our study, but some studies have shown consistency in facial height in spite of tooth loss [31]. We assumed that posterior rotation of the mandible [32], the increase in the dentoalveolar height with age [33], the effect of gravity on the soft tissues, the loosening of muscle tonus and the ageing of the chin’s soft tissues [21] are the main causes. The older adults had a longer middle facial height in comparison to the control group. The position of the glabella point on a facial scan does not change with years [34], so we assume the prolongation to be a result of the clockwise rotation of the maxilla [35] and the changed position of the spina nasalis anterior and the subnasale point. The older adults had a larger lower facial height than the controls. Shimizu et al. have found a shorter upper facial height and a longer lower facial height when comparing older adults with younger ones [36].

The facial height and the lower facial height were smaller in the completely edentulous subgroup. Barlett et al. have studied skull differences in the toothed and edentulous older adults and discovered a shortening of the facial height, because of a shortening of the lower facial height as a result of teeth loosening and atrophy in both jaws [29]. When comparing the different subgroups of older adults, we observed a trend of reducing size of the middle facial height with the loss of teeth, which is statistically significant among the female subgroups and close to statistical significance among the male subgroups.

Apart from the eyes, the most recognizable part of every face is the mouth. Ageing has no impact on the width of the mouth, but tooth loss does. The completely edentulous participants had narrower mouths than the toothed. Sex dimorphism is observed for this parameter, with men having wider mouths than women [37]. The upper-lip height was longer in the group of older adults and some studies have already proven it to be a result of gravity [19], rather than a decrease in soft-tissue volume [38]. The height was the longest for the toothed, and the shortest in the completely edentulous subgroup. The teeth in the intercanine sector are preventing the lip from curling inwards. Upper- and lower-lip rednesses become narrower with age, as has been already described [19]. The completely edentulous subgroup had the narrowest rednesses, which has not yet been described.

The nose is a very significant part of the face and has his own characteristics. In our study we identified nose prolongation with age, no matter the shape and the size of the nose. Older men had longer noses than the young adults. The prolongation of the nose is a consequence of the intrinsic loosening of the lower lateral alar cartilages and the supporting ligaments [39]. We discovered longer noses in the toothed than the completely edentulous adults. No such study comparing edentulism and nose length has been conducted before.

In the profile view of the scan we investigated the distance between the upper and lower lip and the aesthetic line (E-line). Ageing and tooth loss have an important influence on these two parameters. Longer distances between the upper and lower lip and the E-line in the group older of adults means they have poorer facial aesthetics.

The angles that we studied were the facial angle, the soft-tissue ANB angle, the angle of the lower facial height and the nasolabial angle. Older adults had a larger facial angle than the young adults, which means they had a flatter profile.

In our study we placed the soft-tissue points a, n, b corresponding to the bone points in the skeletal angle ANB. In a systematic review of the existing literature we did not find any study relating to the soft-tissue ANB-angle changes in connection with dentition. The soft-tissue ANB angle was smaller in the group of older adults, which is a result of a narrowing of the upper lip and changing the a point position. The change was larger in the female group, because of the more voluminous upper lip. The soft-tissue ANB decreases with tooth loss as a result of maxilla and mandibular atrophy. After loosening of the teeth, especially in the upper jaw, the upper lip is retruded. The statistically significant differences were just in the female subgroups, which means that it is a sex-dependent parameter.

The greater lower-facial-height angle in the group of older adults indicates the retrusion of the perioral tissues. With tooth loss there was a tendency to increase the angle. Studies have shown that the skeletal angle ANB, the inclination of the incisors and canines – supporting the upper lip and ptosis of tip of the nose – have the main impact on the nasolabial angle [40]. In our study a smaller nasolabial angle was observed for the group older adults. The edentulous groups of both sexes had greater nasolabial angles, which means that tooth loss has a large effect.

We wanted to simplify the facial changes due to ageing with facial ratios, but this did not prove to be a good indicator. For the ratio between the facial height and the width there were no statistically significant differences, because of the changes in both directions.

The study by Pucciarelli et al. has some similarities with ours when comparing the facial characteristics of older, toothed participants with edentulous ones [41] In general, we both observed similar facial characteristics, but their sample was not divided by sex, so sexual dimorphism was not revealed, which in our previous study was an important factor [42]. We also included some parameters of the facial profile, i.e., soft-tissue ANB angle, distance between the upper and lower lips and the E-line, that were not part of their study. Another important difference in our study was that we included a comparison of the facial characteristics of older adults with young adults and so better evaluated the natural aging process.


Our goal was to quantify the facial changes observed in an ageing face. We also wanted to evaluate the influence of edentulism. Age influences the facial width and leads to a longer total facial height, as a result of a longer middle facial height. The upper lip is longer and the nose is larger in the elderly. The upper- and lower-lip rednesses are narrower. The facial and the lower-facial-height angles are larger, resulting in a flat facial profile. The nasolabial angle is smaller due to the nose ptosis.

The facial changes in the elderly are the most pronounced in the completely edentulous. In comparison with the toothed group, they have a smaller facial height due to the smaller lower facial height and the larger nasolabial angle. The mouth width is smaller, the upper lip is shorter, and there is a narrower upper- and lower-lip redness. Their profile is flatter and both lips more retruded than in the subjects with teeth.

Our study confirmed the influence of edentulism on the facial characteristics of older adults.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.


  1. Rexbye H, Petersen I, Johansens M, Klitkou L, Jeune B, Christensen K. Influence of environmental factors on facial ageing. Age Ageing. 2006;35(2):110–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McGrath C, Bedi R. The importance of oral health to older people's quality of life. Gerodontology. 1999;16(1):59–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rippon I, Kneale D, de Oliveira C, Demakakos P, Steptoe A. Perceived age discrimination in older adults. Age Ageing. 2014;43(3):379–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Rafee MA. The epidemiology of edentulism and the associated factors: a literature review. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(4):1841–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Sire A, Ferrillo M, Lippi L, Agostini F, de Sire R, Ferrara PE, et al. Sarcopenic dysphagia, malnutrition, and Oral frailty in elderly: a comprehensive review. Nutrients. 2022;14(5):982.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Sire A, Ferrillo M, Gennari A, Cisari C, Pasqua S, Foglio Bonda PL, et al. Bone health, vitamin D status and oral hygiene screening in breast cancer women before starting osteoporosis treatment: a cross-sectional study. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021;35(1):397–402.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Sire A, Invernizzi M, Ferrillo M, Gimigliano F, Baricich A, Cisari C, et al. Functional status and oral health in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cross-sectional study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;48(1):49–57.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Sire A, Baricich A, Ferrillo M, Migliario M, Cisari C, Invernizzi M. Buccal hemineglect: is it useful to evaluate the differences between the two halves of the oral cavity for the multidisciplinary rehabilitative management of right brain stroke survivors? A cross-sectional study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020;27(3):208–14.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim H, Lee E, Lee SW. Association between oral health and frailty: results from the Korea National Health and nutrition examination survey. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):369.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu Z, Xu J, Lin Y, Chai K, Zhou Y, Jia R, et al. Correlation between nutritional status and oral health quality of life, self-efficacy of older inpatients and the influencing factors. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):280.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ortiz-Barrios LB, Granados-Garcia V, Cruz-Hervert P, Moreno-Tamayo K, Heredia-Ponce E, Sanchez-Garcia S. The impact of poor oral health on the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in older adults: the oral health status through a latent class analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):141.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahn DM, Shaw RB. Overview of current thoughts on facial volume and aging. Facial Plast Surg. 2010;26(5):350–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mendelson BC, Wong CH. Anatomy of aging face. In: Warren JR, Neligan PC, editors. Plastic surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2013. p. 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muller F, Naharro M, Carlsson GE. What are the prevalence and incidence of tooth loss in the adult and elderly population in Europe? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(Suppl 3):2–14.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;120(2):98–111.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mendelson B, Wong CH. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2012;36(4):753–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Millay DJ, Larrabee WF Jr. Ptosis and blepharoplasty surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(2):198–201.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guyuron B. The aging nose. Dermatol Clin. 1997;15(4):659–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Raschke GF, Rieger UM, Bader RD, Schaefer O, Guentsch A, Gomez Dammeier M, et al. Perioral aging--an anthropometric appraisal. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(5):312–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Iblher N, Stark GB, Penna V. The aging perioral region -- do we really know what is happening? J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16(6):581–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Coleman SR, Grover R. The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26(Suppl 1):4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pessa JE, Garza PA, Love VM, Zadoo VP, Garza JR. The anatomy of the labiomandibular fold. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(2):482–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ettl S, Arold O, Yang Z, Hausler G. Flying triangulation--an optical 3D sensor for the motion-robust acquisition of complex objects. Appl Opt. 2012;51(2):281–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maal TJ, Verhamme LM, van Loon B, Plooij JM, Rangel FA, Kho A, et al. Variation of the face in rest using 3D stereophotogrammetry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(11):1252–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Demirekin ZB, Gunaydin A, Cavdarli K, Findik Y, Turkaslan S, Baykul T. 3D assessment of facial contours of patients wearing either complete denture or implant-supported fixed dentures. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022;25(3):286–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Doumit GD, Papay F, Orra S, Gharb BB, Zins JE. Abstract P59: aging of the craniofacial Skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(Suppl 4):1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kesterke MJ, Raffensperger ZD, Heike CL, Cunningham ML, Hecht JT, Kau CH, et al. Using the 3D facial norms database to investigate craniofacial sexual dimorphism in healthy children, adolescents, and adults. Biol Sex Differ. 2016;7(23):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Machard A, Jomier M, Hottelart D, Vie K. Identification of new morphological differences between Chinese and Caucasian faces and influence of BMI on these characteristics. Skin Res Technol. 2016;22(2):137–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bartlett SP, Grossman R, Whitaker LA. Age-related changes of the craniofacial skeleton: an anthropometric and histologic analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(4):592–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rongo R, Antoun JS, Lim YX, Dias G, Valletta R, Farella M. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(5):788–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brzoza D, Barrera N, Contasti G, Hernandez A. Predicting vertical dimension with cephalograms, for edentulous patients. Gerodontology. 2005;22(2):98–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Forsberg CM, Eliasson S, Westergren H. Face height and tooth eruption in adults--a 20-year follow-up investigation. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13(4):249–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tallgren A, Solow B. Age differences in adult dentoalveolar heights. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13(2):149–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Klatsky S, Bernard RW, Connell BF, Daniel RK. The difficult forehead. Aesthet Surg J. 2004;24(2):146–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pessa JE. The potential role of stereolithography in the study of facial aging. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;119(2):117–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shimizu T, Motegi E, Nomura M, Kaneko Y, Takeuchi F, Yamaguchi T, et al. Cephalometric study of elderly with nearly intact dental arches. Gerodontology. 2006;23(1):60–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. De Maio M. Ethnic and gender considerations in the use of facial Injectables: male patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(Suppl 5):40–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Penna V, Stark GB, Eisenhardt SU, Bannasch H, Iblher N. The aging lip: a comparative histological analysis of age-related changes in the upper lip complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):624–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Toriumi DM. Surgical correction of the aging nose. Facial Plast Surg. 1996;12(2):205–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Edelstein DR. Aging of the normal nose in adults. Laryngoscope. 1996;106(Suppl 81):1–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pucciarelli MGR, de Lima H, Toyoshima G, de Oliveira TM, Neppelenbroek KH, Soares S. Quantifying the facial proportions in edentulous individuals before and after rehabilitation with complete dentures compared with dentate individuals: a 3D stereophotogrammetry study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022.

  42. Skomina Z, Verdenik M, Hren NI. Effect of aging and body characteristics on facial sexual dimorphism in the Caucasian population. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0231983.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Our manuscript is the work of four authors. ZS and DK made a substantial contribution to the conception and design of the manuscript. They collected the data, helped with statistical analyses and drafted the article. MV’s work was based on the analysis of facial scans in the RapidForm computer program, statistics and interpretation of the data. NIH was the mentor. She helped with all steps of the study and later with publishing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zala Skomina.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol for the study was approved by the Slovenian National Medical Ethics Committee (MZ 0120–392/2016–2, KME 64/08/16). All methods were performed in accordance with the Declarations of Helsinki.

Written informed consent to participate in the research was obtained from all the subjects.

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and clinical images was obtained from all the participants.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and clinical images was obtained from all the participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skomina, Z., Kočevar, D., Verdenik, M. et al. Older adults’ facial characteristics compared to young adults’ in correlation with edentulism: a cross sectional study. BMC Geriatr 22, 503 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Facial measurements
  • Older adult
  • Dentition
  • Edentulous patients