Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Characteristics of fall‐related head injury versus non‐head injury in the older adults

BMC Geriatrics volume 21, Article number: 196 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to examine the characteristics of older adults patients who suffered a head injury after a ground-level fall in comparison to non-head injury patients as well as the factors associated with severity in those with head injury only.

Methods

Patients were classified into two groups, the head injury group and the non-head injury group. The characteristics were compared and factors associated with head injury were evaluated. Factors relating to severe injury in the head injury group were also investigated.

Results

The head injury group comprised 42 % of a study subjects. Male sex; fall time of 18:00–23:59; fall location of medical facility, transportation area, and public or commercial facility; fall in an outdoor area; fall during daily activity; alcohol ingestion; fall from stairs; non-slippery floor conditions; concrete flooring; sloped flooring; and presence of obstacles on the floor were risk factors for head injury in the older adults after a ground-level fall. Male sex and age over 70 years; fall time of 00:00–05:59; fall in a residential facility; fall in an indoor area; fall during daily activity; fall from stairs; non-slippery floor conditions; and presence of obstacles on the floor were factors associated with severe injury in the head injury group.

Conclusions

Male sex with advanced age, indoor fall, and the presence of obstacles on the floor were risk factors for severe injury in the head injury group in older adults individuals who suffered a ground-level fall. It is necessary to develop appropriate ground-level fall prevention programs by evaluating the individual and environmental characteristics of older adults patients.

Peer Review reports

Background

Ground-level falls are the most common cause of injury in the older adults [1]. Injuries associated with ground-level falls are becoming a serious global health problem as the older adults population grows [1, 2]. More than 60 % of traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases in older people are the result of falls, [3] and the prevalence of fall-related TBI has increased over the past few decades [3, 4]. Of all body regions that are injured in a fall, the head is most likely to be associated with mortality, [5, 6] and more than half of all fall-related deaths in older adults are related to head injuries [7]. TBI resulting from fall in the older adults is associated with declines in physical activity and cognitive function, as well as increasing healthcare cost with increasing hospital usage [3, 4].

Fall-related deaths are on the rise even though other trauma-related deaths are on the decline [8]. More than one-third of older adults patients who visit the emergency department (ED) after a fall-related injury revisit the ED or die within one year [9]. Therefore, it is important to reduce morbidity, mortality and economic losses by identifying the characteristics and risk factors for fall injury in the older adults.

Many studies have been performed on the characteristics of falls among the older adults, [2,3,4,5,6,7, 10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] but no studies have analysed the characteristics of head injuries by comparing groups of head injury and non-head injury patients after falls in the older adults. This study aimed to examine the characteristics of older adults patients who suffered a head injury after a ground-level fall in comparison to non-head injury patients and the factors associated with severity in those with head injury only.

Methods

This study looked at Emergency Department-based Injury In-depth Surveillance data from the Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA), which has been collected since 2006. Data on older adults (aged 60 or older) who suffered a ground-level fall injury and presented to one of six university hospital EDs during an 8-year period from January 2011 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Because the fall injury rate is similar amongst those older than 65 years and 60–64 years of age, [22] older adults aged ≥ 60 years old were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups, those who mainly suffered a head injury (head injury group) and those whose main injury involved another body part (non-head injury group). The study subjects included only those who had suffered a ground-level fall, not a fall from height. For each patient, the main injury was classified into seven regions according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10): head and neck (S00-S19), thorax (S20-29), abdomen (S30-39), upper extremity (S40-69), hip and thigh (S70-79), lower extremity (S80-89) and multiple body region (T00-T14). Head and neck injury was defined as head injury since solitary neck injury is rare and many cases of neck injury are accompanied by head injury. This study was reviewed by the institutional IRB (UUH-IRB-2020-09-031) and consent was not required from the study subjects.

The general characteristics of the patients, including age, sex, season of injury occurrence, time of injury occurrence, location of injury occurrence, activity during injury occurrence, alcohol ingestion, education, occupation, mechanism of ground-level fall, environment of the floor when the fall occurred, blood pressure at the time of ED arrival, mode of transportation to the ED, state of consciousness, location of major injury, Excess Mortality Ratio-Adjusted Injury Severity Score (EMR-ISS), [14, 16, 25, 26] result of ED treatment, surgery, and injury severity were investigated. Age was divided into three groups, 60–69, 70–79, and 80 or older. Seasons were classified into spring (from March to May), summer (from June to August), autumn (from September to November) and winter (from November to February). The time of fall occurrence was divided into six-hour units. The location of fall occurrence was divided into six categories: residential facility, transportation area, medical facility, work place or sports facility, commercial or public facility and outdoor area; location was also classified as indoor or outdoor. The activities during fall occurrence were divided into four categories: paid work, unpaid work such as cleaning and cooking, leisure or sports activities, and daily activities such as using the toilet or showering. Education was categorized by highest level achieved, as follows: no education or elementary school, middle school, high school, and higher than college. The mechanism of ground-level fall was classified as fall from stairs, slip down on the same level, and others such as fall over. The floor condition was divided into slippery or not, and the type of floor was divided into concrete or other, such as soil or wood. The slope of the floor and whether an obstacle was present on the floor at the time of the fall were also investigated. The transportation to the ED was classified as public ambulance, individual transportation and transfer from another medical facility. Consciousness was divided according to AVPU scale: alert, verbal, pain, unresponsive. EMR-ISS is commonly utilized in South Korea as it is the injury severity scoring system based on the ICD-10. The excess mortality ratio for all ICD-10 codes from the Korean national injury database was used to grade the severity of every injury on a scale of 1–5. The EMR-ISS was calculated as the sum of squares of three maximum severity grades. The results of ED treatment were divided into discharge, admission to the general ward or intensive care unit, transfer to another facility, and death in the ED. The definition of a “severe” patient was one who required emergency surgery; was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or transferred to other facility for further specialized care; or was died in the ED or dead on arrival. The head injury group was further sub-divided into a severe and non-severe injury group.

The Chi-square test and Student’s t-test were used to compare the characteristics between the head injury and non-head injury groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted on the patients’ general characteristics to identify the factors relating to head injury according to the patients’ individual and environmental characteristics at the time of injury. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by selecting statistically significant variables (p < 0.05) in the univariate analysis. The education and occupation variables were not included in the logistic regression analysis due to a large number of missing values since the two were generally recorded only in hospitalized patients. Chi-square and Student’s t-tests were conducted to compare the general characteristics of the severe and non-severe head injury groups. To identify the factors associated with severe injury in the head injury group, univariate logistic regression analysis was also performed using the variables that were related to the general characteristics of the head injury group, and multivariate regression analysis was performed by selecting the statistically significant variables from the univariate analysis. IBM SPSS 24.0 (IBM Inc., Somers, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses and p < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Results

A total of 34,366 patients were included in this study, with 14,433 (42.0 %) comprising the head injury group. The most common age group was 60–69 in the head injury group (40.1 %), whereas it was 70–79 in the non-head injury group (37 %) (p = 0.000). There were 7,795 (54.0 %) men in the head injury group and 5,747 (28.8 %) men in the non-head injury group (p = 0.000). The time of injury occurrence in the head injury group was most often 18:00–23:59, accounting for 34.1 % of patients, and 12:00–17:59 in the non-head injury group, with 34.7 % of patients. The two most frequent locations of injury occurrence were residential facilities (46.5 % vs. 56.9 %, head injury vs. non-head injury) and transportation areas (36.4 % vs. 26.6 %) in both groups (p = 0.000). Patients injured in an outdoor area accounted for 50.9 % of the head injury group and 41.3 % of the non-head injury group (p = 0.000). The patients were most often engaging in daily activities (76.2 % in the head injury group and 79.9 % in the non-head injury group) (p = 0.000). Twenty-three percent of patients were drinking alcohol at the time of injury in the head injury group, whereas the figure was 4.4 % in the non-head injury group (p = 0.000). The number of patients with a job was 16.7 % in the head injury group and 7.4 % in the non-head injury group (p = 0.000). Regarding the mechanism of fall, 15.5 % of the head injury group and 11.1 % of the non-head injury group fell from the stairs, and 42.7 % of the head injury group and 48.4 % of the non-head injury group slipped on the same level (p = 0.000). The floor was slippery in just 8.2 % of the cases in the head injury group and 11.9 % in the non-head injury group (p = 0.000). Fall on a concrete floor accounted for 84.2 % of the head injury group and 78.3 % of the non-head injury group (p = 0.000). The ground was sloped in 13.9 % of cases in the head injury group and 11.6 % in the non-head injury group (p = 0.000). There were obstacles on the floor 11.9 % of the time in the head injury group and 9.9 % in the non-head injury group (p = 0.000). Public ambulance (45.6 %) was the most common mode of transportation to the ED in the head injury group, while individual transportation (48.3 %) was more common in the non-head injury group (p = 0.000). In terms of consciousness at the ED, 92.9 % of the head injury group and 99.2 % of the non-head injury group were alert (p = 0.000). The most commonly injured region in the non-head injury group was the hip and thigh, accounting for 31.8 % of the patients. The EMR-ISS of the head injury group, 16.3, was higher than that of the non-head injury group, 11.3. The rate of admission to the general ward was 11.3 % in the head injury group and 42.0 % in the non-head injury group, while the rates of admission to the ICU were 8.0 % and 1.6 %, respectively. Surgery was performed on 11.1 % of patients in the head injury group and 26.6 % in the non-head injury group (p = 0.000), and severe patients accounted for 9.9 % of the head injury group and 3.8 % of the non-head injury group (p = 0.000) (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of fall-related head injury and non-head injury in the older adults
Full size table

The main factors significantly associated with head injury after a ground-level fall in patients over 60 years of age were male sex (odds ratio 2.257, 95 % confidence interval 2.132–2.389, p = 0.000); time of injury, between 18:00 and 23:59 compared to 00:00 to 05:59 (1.167, 1.073–1.270, p = 0.000); injury location, medical facility (1.323, 1.061–1.651, p = 0.013), transportation area (1.147, 1.039–1.265, p = 0.006), or public or commercial facility (1.298, 1.160–1.452, p = 0.000) compared to residential facility; outdoor location (1.254, 1.146–1.372, p = 0.000); and unpaid work during injury occurrence compared to daily activity (1.234, 1.082–1.408, p = 0.0020). Alcohol ingestion (3.881, 3.488–4.318, p = 0.000); falling from stairs compared to falling over (1.476, 1.292–1.686, p = 0.000); non-slippery floor conditions (1.313, 1.202–1.433, p = 0.000); concrete flooring (1.178, 1.097–1.264, p = 0.000); sloped flooring (1.242, 1.105–1.396, p = 0.000); and presence of obstacles on the floor (1.120, 1.025–1.224, p = 0.013) were the other factors associated with head injury in older adults patients who suffered ground-level fall injuries (Table 2).

Table 2 Factors associated with fall-related head injury vs. non-head injury in the older adults
Full size table

The most common age group was 70–79 years (40.6 %) in the severe subgroup and 60–69 years (40.8 %) in the non-severe subgroup of the head injury group (p = 0.000). The proportion of males in the severe group was higher than that in the non-severe group (p = 0.000). The most common locations of injury were residential facilities and transportation areas in both groups. Ground-level fall injuries tended to occur in indoor areas more often in the severe group than the non-severe group (52.3 % vs. 48.7 %) (p = 0.010). Fifteen point five % of the severe group and 18.2 % of the non-severe group were engaged in a sports or leisure activity at the time of the injury (p = 0.016). Alcohol ingestion was more common in the non-severe group (p = 0.014) and employment status was not different between the two groups. Fall from stairs was the fall mechanism in 22.0 % of the severe group and 14.8 % of the non-severe group (p = 0.000). At the time of injury occurrence, the floor was sloped in 18.7 % of cases in the severe group and 13.3 % of those in the non-severe group (p = 0.000), and obstacles were present on the floor in 15.9 % of cases in the severe group and 11.5 % of those in the non-severe group (p = 0.000) (Table 3).

Table 3 General characteristics of fall-related head injury by severity in the older adults
Full size table

The significant main factors associated with severe injury in older adults patients with head injury after ground-level fall were: males (odds ratio 1.626, 95 % confidence interval 1.414–1.869, p = 0.000) aged 70 years or greater; time of injury, 00:00–05:59 rather than 18:00–23:59 (1.252, 1.028–1.524, p = 0.025); residential facility rather than transportation area (1.721, 1.391–2.128, p = 0.000); indoor rather than outdoor area (1.258, 1.046–1.514, p = 0.015); daily activity rather than unpaid activity (1.543, 1.075–2.212, p = 0.018); fall from stairs (1.835, 1.372–2.453, p = 0.000) or slip down on the same level rather than fall over (1.547, 1.321–1.812, p = 0.000); non-slippery floor rather than slippery conditions (1.399, 1.093–1.792, p = 0.008); and presence of obstacles on the floor (1.298, 1.061–1.588, p = 0.011) (Table 4).

Table 4 General characteristics of fall-related head injury by severity in the older adults
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, men were more likely than women to present to the ED with head injuries and men in the head injury group were also more likely than women to have suffered severe injuries. The overall incidence of fall-related injuries in the older adults is higher in women than in men, [5] but the mortality rate associated with such injuries was higher in men than in women [10, 12, 19]. In a previous study, after a fall injury, men had more head, face, and chest injuries than women, and women had more extremity injuries than men;[7] however, another study showed that the rate of head impact was more than twice as high in women than in men [24]. The difference in sex-specific mortality is likely attributable to the increased life expectancy of women vs. men [27] as well as sex-based differences in muscle strength. The higher mortality rate in older adults men after fall injuries may be related to several factors, such as their increased incidence of outdoor falls, their comparatively rapid decay of leg muscles coupled with higher overall activity levels, [20] their increased rates of comorbidity, and their greater tendency to participate in active behaviors, all of which would be expected to result in more severe injuries than those seen in women [10]. Other studies have shown that older women are at greater risk of indoor fall injuries because their leg muscles are weaker than those of men,[23] and that the ground-level fall injury risk is higher in women owing to an increased possibility of a loss of balance [28].

In this study, age was not an independent risk factor for head injury after ground-level fall in the older adults; however, those over the age of 69 in the head injury group were at greater risk of severe injury. In a previous study, patients over the age of 70 spent longer in the hospital and ICU and had an increased mortality rate than their younger counterparts [19]. Another study showed that the mortality rate according to age after a ground-level fall injury is sex-specific. The odds ratio of in-hospital mortality of the group older than 60 years vs. under 60 was higher in men, but it was not a significant risk factor in women aged 60–79 compared to those under 60 [21].

Alcohol use is a risk factor for fall injury in the older adults, possibly because blood alcohol levels after imbibing tend to remain higher in older people than young people owing to a decline in metabolic rate with age [29]. In this study, alcohol ingestion was a risk for head injury after ground-level falls in the older adults, but it did not affect the rate of severe injury in the head injury group. The prevalence of alcohol ingestion at the time of fall injury was higher in this study than in a previous study [18]. The definition of severe injury, which involved an emergency operation or admission to the ICU in this study, or the particular characteristics of the study subjects, all of whom presented to the university hospital ED, might affect this result. A head injury was more likely to result from a ground-level fall when alcohol was ingested than when no alcohol was ingested [12, 13]. Alcohol ingestion at the time of a ground-level fall tended to increase the rate of head injury among older people; also, men who suffered a ground-level fall were more likely to ingest alcohol than women and the rate of alcohol ingestion decreased with increasing age [18]. Alcohol impairs self-protective reflexes and makes it harder for an older adults to use their arms to control a fall, thus increasing the likelihood of head injury [13].

Environmental factors related to the floor are also important in ground-level fall injury in the older adults. In this study, the risk of head injury after a ground-level fall was higher if the floor was not slippery, made of concrete, sloped, and had obstacles and the risk of severe injury in the head injury group was higher when the floor was non-slippery and had obstacles. Although the floor environment did not affect injury severity, in men, the risk of severe injury was higher for outdoor falls from stairs [14]. Previous studies have shown that the characteristics of the floor and flooring materials affect the severity of fall injury among the older adults [11, 30, 31]. Fall injury increases when there are obstacles on the floor [17] and decreases when the floor is flat or soft [15, 30]. The risk of severe injury is higher on a non-slippery floor [14]. This may be related to an increase in outdoor falls, as the activity levels of older adults individuals tend to increase outdoors [15]. In addition, in this study, the risk of head injury was greater when the mechanism of injury was a fall from stairs compared to falling over, and the risk of severe injury in the head injury group was also increased. In previous studies, among those who suffered a fall injury outdoors, falls from stairs rather than non-head injury mechanisms were associated with a higher risk of severe injury due to the height difference [14, 16].

Although the degree of cognitive impairment, degree of independence in daily life, and degree of visual impairment may affect the incidence and severity of falls in the older adults, [24] those factors were not included in this study. Also, individual medical history or use of medications that could affect fall injury in the older adults were not investigated in this study. The subjects of this study may have suffered more severe injuries than those in a population-based study because all of the hospitals in this study were university training hospitals. Functional cognitive outcomes were not included in this study; moreover, severity was defined by clinical outcomes at the ED, not by objective data such as injury severity scale or Glasgow coma scale scores. These factors may have influenced the results. Although many previous studies defined the older adults as those aged 65 years or older, this study set the cut-off point for the older adults at 60 years old. Although this study has limitations related to descriptive analysis, environmental factors (such as slipperiness, slope, flooring material, and the presence of obstacles) that could influence ground-level fall-related injuries in the older adults were included in the analysis. The results of this study are expected to be utilised to help identify and improve upon environmental risk factors in order to reduce the risk of falls in the older adults.

Male sex, outdoor fall, alcohol ingestion, sloping floor, and presence of obstacles on the floor were risk factors associated with head injury after a ground-level fall in the older adults in this study. The severe head injury subgroup were more likely to be older males, to have suffered an indoor fall, and to have encountered obstacles on the floor. It is necessary to develop preventive programs, taking both individual and environmental characteristics into account, to reduce the socioeconomic costs associated with ground fall injury in the older adults in an aging era.

Availability of data and materials

The Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) has the authority to access and use this data. Data can be requested through the department of injury prevention of the KDCA by E-mail (kcdcinjury@korea.kr) or website (http://www.kdca.go.kr/).

Abbreviations

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

ED:

Emergency department

KDCA:

Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention Agency

ICD-10:

International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision

EMR-ISS:

Excess mortality ratio-adjusted injury severity score

ICU:

Intensive care unit

References

  1. Miyoshi Y, Kondo Y, Hirano Y, Ishihara T, Sueyoshi K, Okamoto K, Tanaka H. Characteristics, injuries, and clinical outcomes of geriatric trauma patients in Japan: an analysis of the nationwide trauma registry database. Scientific reports. 2020;10(1):19148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Deandrea S, Lucenteforte E, Bravi F, Foschi R, La Vecchia C, Negri E. Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology. 2010;21(5):658–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harvey LA, Close JC. Traumatic brain injury in older adults: characteristics, causes and consequences. Injury. 2012;43(11):1821–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Korhonen N, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, Kannus P. Incidence of fall-related traumatic brain injuries among older Finnish adults between 1970 and 2011. Jama. 2013;309(18):1891–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Neill S, Brady RR, Kerssens JJ, Parks RW. Mortality associated with traumatic injuries in the elderly: a population based study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;54(3):e426–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peel NM, Kassulke DJ, McClure RJ. Population based study of hospitalised fall related injuries in older people. Inj Prev. 2002;8(4):280–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevens JA, Rudd RA. Circumstances and contributing causes of fall deaths among persons aged 65 and older: United States, 2010. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(3):470–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Adair T, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu SW, Obermeyer Z, Chang Y, Shankar KN. Frequency of ED revisits and death among older adults after a fall. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(8):1012–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alamgir H, Muazzam S, Nasrullah M. Unintentional falls mortality among elderly in the United States: time for action. Injury. 2012;43(12):2065–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhattacharya B, Maung A, Schuster K, Davis KA. The older they are the harder they fall: Injury patterns and outcomes by age after ground level falls. Injury. 2016;47(9):1955–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chatha H, Sammy I, Hickey M, Sattout A, Hollingsworth J. Falling down a flight of stairs: The impact of age and intoxication on injury pattern and severity. Trauma. 2018;20(3):169–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnston JJ, McGovern SJ. Alcohol related falls: an interesting pattern of injuries. Emerg Med J. 2004;21(2):185–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jung HY, Kim SH, Lee SC, Kim S, Cho GC, Kim MJ, Lee JS, Han C. Relating factors to severe injury from outdoor falls in older people. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018;18(1):80–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelsey JL, Procter-Gray E, Hannan MT, Li W. Heterogeneity of falls among older adults: implications for public health prevention. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(11):2149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim SH. Risk factors for severe injury following indoor and outdoor falls in geriatric patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;62:75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim YM, Sung MH. Home environmental and health-related factors among home fallers and recurrent fallers in community dwelling older Korean women. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012;18(5):481–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shakya I, Bergen G, Haddad YK, Kakara R, Moreland BL. Fall-related emergency department visits involving alcohol among older adults. J Safety Res. 2020;74:125–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Spaniolas K, Cheng JD, Gestring ML, Sangosanya A, Stassen NA, Bankey PE. Ground level falls are associated with significant mortality in elderly patients. J Trauma. 2010;69(4):821–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stevens JA, Sogolow ED. Gender differences for non-fatal unintentional fall related injuries among older adults. Inj Prev. 2005;11(2):115–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Taira T, Morita S, Umebachi R, Miura N, Icimura A, Inoue S, Nakagawa Y, Inokuchi S. Risk factors for ground-level falls differ by sex. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(5):640–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Verma SK, Willetts JL, Corns HL, Marucci-Wellman HR, Lombardi DA, Courtney TK. Falls and Fall-Related Injuries among Community-Dwelling Adults in the United States. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolfson L, Whipple R, Derby CA, Amerman P, Nashner L. Gender differences in the balance of healthy elderly as demonstrated by dynamic posturography. J Gerontol. 1994;49(4):M160–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang Y, Mackey DC, Liu-Ambrose T, Leung PM, Feldman F, Robinovitch SN. Clinical Risk Factors for Head Impact During Falls in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study in Long-Term Care. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017;32(3):168–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim J, Shin SD, Im TH, Kug Jong L, Ko SB, Park JO, Ahn KO, Song KJ: Development and validation of the Excess Mortality Ratio-adjusted Injury Severity Score Using the International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition. Academic emergency medicine: official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2009, 16(5):454–464.

  26. Lee H, Kim SH, Lee SC, Kim S, Cho GC, Kim MJ, Lee JS, Han C. Severe Injuries from Low-height Falls in the Elderly Population. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33(36):e221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Life expectancy at birth [https://data.oecd.org/healthstat/life-expectancy-at-birth.html]

  28. Caserotti P, Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Puggaard L. Contraction-specific differences in maximal muscle power during stretch-shortening cycle movements in elderly males and females. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;84(3):206–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Barry KL, Blow FC. Drinking Over the Lifespan: Focus on Older Adults. Alcohol Res. 2016;38(1):115–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Drahota AK, Ward D, Udell JE, Soilemezi D, Ogollah R, Higgins B, Dean TP, Severs M. Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of flooring to reduce injuries from falls in wards for older people. Age Ageing. 2013;42(5):633–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gustavsson J, Bonander C, Andersson R, Nilson F. Investigating the fall-injury reducing effect of impact absorbing flooring among female nursing home residents: initial results. Inj Prev. 2015;21(5):320–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a research grant from the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, 877 Bangeojinsunhwando-ro, Dong-gu, 44033, Ulsan, Republic of Korea

    Sun Hyu Kim

  2. Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea

    Sunpyo Kim

  3. Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Gyu Chong Cho

  4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Ji Hwan Lee

  5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea

    Eun Jung Park

  6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Duk Hee Lee

Authors
  1. Sun Hyu Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sunpyo Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gyu Chong Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ji Hwan Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eun Jung Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Duk Hee Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: SHK. Data curation: SHK, JHL, EJP, DHL. Formal analysis: SHK, SK, GCC. Investigation: SHK, SK, GCC, JHL, EJP, DHL. Methodology: SHK. Project administration: SHK. Resources: SHK, SK, GCC, JHL, EJP, DHL. Software: SHK. Supervision: SHK. Validation: SHK, SK, GCC, JHL, EJP, DHL. Visualization: SHK. Writing—original draft preparation: SHK. Writing—review and editing: SHK, SK, GCC. All authors have read and agreed to the contents of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun Hyu Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by Ulsan University Hospital Institutional Review Board (UUH-IRB-2020-09-031).Informed consent was exempted by the institutional review board due to retrospective study. The data used in this study was anonymised before its use.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S.H., Kim, S., Cho, G.C. et al. Characteristics of fall‐related head injury versus non‐head injury in the older adults. BMC Geriatr 21, 196 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02139-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02139-4

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us