Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Comparing proton pump inhibitors with histamin-2 receptor blockers regarding the risk of osteoporotic fractures: a nested case-control study of more than 350,000 Korean patients with GERD and peptic ulcer disease

BMC Geriatrics volume 20, Article number: 407 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Patients with peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are more likely to receive long-term therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This study aimed to investigate the risk of osteoporotic fractures in PPI users compared to histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) users and the association between fractures and the duration and regular use of PPI.

Methods

A population-based, nationwide nested case-control study from January 2006 to December 2015 was performed using Korean National Health Insurance Service claims data. We included patients ≥50 years of age, without previous fractures, newly prescribed with PPI or H2RA, and diagnosed with PUD or GERD from 2006 to 2015. Patients with osteoporotic fracture (n = 59,240) were matched with the non-fracture control group (n = 296,200) at a 1:5 ratio based on sex, age, cohort entry date, follow-up duration, and bisphosphonate use. The osteoporotic fractures were defined using the diagnostic codes of claims data (M80, M81, M82, M484, M485, S220, S221, S320, S327, S422, S423, S525, S526, S72).

Results

The higher the cumulative use of PPIs, the higher the osteoporotic fracture risk (P for trend < 0.001). The risk of osteoporotic fracture in the patients whose cumulative use of PPI was more than 1 year was higher than that of others (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.32–1.52). Patients who regularly used PPI in the recent 1 year had a higher risk of osteoporotic fracture than exclusive H2RA users (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.26–1.50).

Conclusions

The risk of osteoporotic fracture increased with the duration of PPI use, especially when PPI was used for ≥1 year and regularly in the recent 1 year.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and peptic ulcer disease (PUD) are very common disorders with a long disease course. Therefore, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which are used for the treatment of GERD and PUD, are among the most frequently prescribed drugs for long-term use worldwide [1, 2]. In general, PPIs are considered relatively safe drugs with few short-term adverse effects; however, an increasing number of studies have reported on adverse effects associated with long-term use [3]. As one of them, it is suggested that reducing calcium absorption through the inhibition of gastric acid secretion by using PPI may cause an osteoporotic fracture [4,5,6,7,8].

Osteoporotic fractures are a major health problem worldwide and are expected to further increase in incidence with increases in life expectancy [9, 10]. Osteoporotic fractures are a major cause of increased mortality [11], increased number of hospitalizations [12, 13], high health-care costs, and reduced quality of life [14]. As PPIs are effective and widely used drugs, it is necessary to investigate the duration and patterns of their use, as well as what extent of PPI use is associated with osteoporotic fractures.

Prior studies that reported that PPIs are associated with osteoporotic fractures yielded inconsistent results on the duration and use patterns of PPIs, which influence the osteoporotic fracture risk. Most studies have reported that any use [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] or current use [25,26,27] of PPIs increases the osteoporotic fracture risk. However, the association between the duration of PPI use and osteoporotic fracture has been inconsistently reported, with some studies showing a relation [21] and others reporting no relation [27, 28]. In addition, previous studies were mostly performed other than Asian countries. Therefore, studies based on Asian population are needed because there are genetic and ethnic differences in the pharmacological action of PPI [29], in bone mineral density [30], and in the prevalence of osteoporotic fractures.

Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the risk of osteoporotic fractures associated with PPI use compared to exclusive H2RA use, according to the duration of use and regular use of PPIs. H2RA users are the desirable comparator of PPI users because H2RA users are more likely to have underlying gastrointestinal disorders similar to PPI users, and H2RA’s gastric secretion inhibition is weaker than PPI.

Methods

Data source

We used the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) claim data and the biannual regular health examination data. South Korea has a mandatory social health insurance system covering approximately 97% of the entire population. Almost all medical data, including diagnostic codes, procedures, prescription drugs, and personal information, are included in the NHIS database. The NHIS also conducts a standardized national health screening program every 2 years for all insured persons aged over 40 years and every year for employee subscribers aged 20 years or older. National health screening data include anthropometric measurements, laboratory tests, and social history.

Patients with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes for PUD or GERD (K21, K25, K26, K27, and K28) and a prescription history of PPIs or histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2015 were extracted. Subsequently, information on demographic characteristics and lifestyle or health behavior information (age, sex, residence, income level, height, weight, body mass index, smoking, alcohol drinking, exercise, etc.) were extracted.

All personal identification numbers have been encrypted by converting them into scrambled numbers before data processing, to comply with the privacy rules of the health insurance transfer and privacy laws. Therefore, the use of anonymized information exempted this study from the need for written consent. This study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration. All research procedures and ethical aspects were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (approval no. 17–011).

Study design and patient selection

We included patients with GERD and PUD, who were prescribed PPI or H2RA at least once with this diagnosis. We did not include non-users of gastric acid inhibitor, who have never used PPI or H2RA during the observation period. Comparing PPI users with non-users of a gastric acid inhibitor can lead to an overestimation of PPI risks. Individuals who have never used PPI or H2RA during the observation period are likely to be in relatively good health and may not have peptic ulcer disease or gastritis, reducing calcium absorption and affecting fracture risk. Therefore, we evaluated the risk of osteoporotic fractures associated with PPI use compared to H2RA use to avoid overestimating the PPI effect. The cohort entry date was defined as the date when the first drug (PPI or H2RA) was prescribed. We defined the case group as patients who developed osteoporotic fractures during the follow-up period and the control group as those who did not develop osteoporotic fractures. A nested case-control study was performed to examine the risk of osteoporotic fracture between the PPI use group and the H2RA use group.

A total of 35,520,188 patients were taking either PPI or H2RA for PUD and GERD from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2015. Only new users who did not have a history of being prescribed with PPI or H2RA within the first year of cohort entry were included. The exclusion criteria were as follows: age < 50 years on cohort entry; medical service use because of cancer (ICD-10 code: C, T), acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (B20–24), or osteoporosis (M80, 81) within 1 year before entering the cohort; or a diagnosis of osteoporotic fracture (spine: S220, 221, 320, 327, M484, 485; proximal humerus: S422, 423; femur: S72; distal radius: S525, 526) within 1 year before cohort entry. Patients with missing values in the matching variables were also excluded. To use the variables included in the health screening data as covariates, those who did not undergo a national health screening were excluded. After the exclusions, 2,388,137 patients remained.

The outcome index (osteoporotic fracture) was defined using the codes requested from the health insurance claims data. First, patients with osteoporosis with pathological fracture were selected (disease classification code: M80). Second, patients who had a diagnosis of osteoporosis (M81, 82) and experienced an osteoporotic fracture after study entry were collected. Osteoporotic fractures were defined as fractures of 4 parts: spine (S220, 221, 320, 327, M484, 485), proximal humerus (S422, 423), femur (S72), and distal radius (S525, 526). Patients in whom osteoporosis was diagnosed before osteoporotic fracture or within 90 days after osteoporotic fracture were defined as the osteoporotic fracture group. The patients who had osteoporotic fractures during the follow-up period (from cohort entry to 2015) was 78,465.

The index date was the time of osteoporotic fracture. When the osteoporotic fracture occurred more than twice during the study period, the time of the first fracture was used in the analysis. Corresponding to the osteoporotic fracture group, the control group was selected, through 1:5 matching according to sex, age group with a 5-year interval, and use of bisphosphonates, among patients who did not develop osteoporotic fractures within the same cohort entry and follow-up period. Finally, we had 59,240 matched cases and 296,200 controls. The process of selecting and excluding patients for the final analysis is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of patient selection. PPI, proton pump inhibitor; H2RA, histamine-2 receptor antagonist

Full size image

Definition of PPI exposure and covariates

The criteria for PPI use were ‘any use’, ‘duration of use’, and ‘regular use’. We defined any use of PPI as being prescribed PPI at least once during the study period. We also defined PPI duration as the cumulative days of use calculated by adding the prescriptions days regardless of continuity. The cumulative days of PPI were categorized as < 30, 30–59, 60–89, 90–179, 180–364, and ≥ 365 days. The recent 1 year prior to osteoporotic fracture was divided into four quarters. We identified the number of quarters with PPI use from one to four. The use of PPI over four quarters was defined as “regular use.”

We considered various covariates associated with the development of osteoporotic fractures due to the use of PPI. These include socioeconomic and demographic factors such as sex, age, residence area, income, and anthropometric and lifestyle factors such as body mass index, drinking, smoking, and exercise. We obtained information on health behaviors through a standardized self- administered questionnaire collected on the day of the national health screenings. According to smoking status, subjects were classified into non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers. Heavy alcohol drinkers were defined as those who consumed ≥30 g/day of alcohol. Physical activity was classified as follows according to the frequency of ≥20 min of strenuous exercise (none, ≤ four times per week, and ≥ five times per week). The national health screenings also included measurements of body size. Body mass index was calculated by dividing the body weight by the square of the height (kg/m2). Income levels were classified into quintile groups using the NHIS qualification data.

These covariates also consisted of concomitant diseases and concomitant medications that could directly or indirectly affect osteoporotic fracture development. The use of bisphosphonates, glucocorticoids, anticonvulsants, hormone replacement therapy, warfarin, heparin, antacids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines, and tricyclic antidepressants was considered concomitant medication use. All were defined using the drug code (main ingredient code). Concomitant diseases were defined using the ICD-10 codes and included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (J44, 45), testicular dysfunction (E29.1), hypothalamic dysfunction (E23.0), hyperthyroidism (E05), hyperparathyroidism (E21), Cushing’s syndrome (E24), hyperprolactinemia (E22.1), vitamin D deficiency (E55.9), idiopathic hypercalciuria (E83.5), diabetes (E11–14 and diabetic agents), anorexia nervosa (F50.0, 50.1), systemic lupus erythematous (M32), hypertension (I10–13, I15, and use of antihypertensive agents), intestinal absorption disorder (K90), inflammatory bowel disease (K50, 51), chronic kidney disease (N18), and secondary amenorrhea (N91.1). Another variable considered as a covariate was the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Comorbidities and medications used were defined as at least one claim for the relevant drug code and diagnostic code for the period from 1 year before the date of cohort entry to the end of follow-up.

Statistical analysis

The categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages of the patients. For continuous variables, means and standard deviations were presented.

Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to investigate the association of PPI use and osteoporotic fracture compared to the exclusive H2RA use. The crude model was not adjusted for covariates, and the full-adjusted model included adjustments for age, sex, body mass index, alcohol drinking, smoking, exercise, concomitant medications, and diseases as covariates. Subgroup analyses were conducted by sex and age. Interaction tests were performed to determine whether the associations differed by sex and age. We also calculated p values for linear trends of osteoporotic fracture risk according to the increase in the cumulative duration and the regular use of PPI. Two-sided P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

The mean patient age was 64.8 ± 8.0 years in the osteoporotic fracture group and 64.6 ± 8.1 years in the non- osteoporotic fracture group. Their median duration of PPI use was 30 (interquartile range, 14–74) days. We included 78.0% female patients, and the proportion of bisphosphonate use was 75.9% in both groups (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic status and comorbidity in the osteoporotic fracture group and the non-osteoporotic fracture group
Full size table

The OR of osteoporotic fracture of PPI users was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.08–1.13) compared to that of exclusive H2RA users in the full-adjusted model. The risk of osteoporotic fracture tended to increase with the cumulative use of PPI (P for trend < 0.001). The risk of osteoporotic fracture in the patients whose cumulative use of PPI was more than 1 year was higher than that of others (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.32–1.52),(Table 2).

Table 2 Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the risk of osteoporotic fracture associated with PPI use compared to exclusive H2RA use
Full size table

We also analyzed the risk of osteoporotic fracture according to recent regular use of PPI. The results showed that the risk of osteoporotic fracture increased as the number of quarters of PPI use during the year prior to osteoporotic fracture increased (P for trend < 0.001). Patients who used PPI on a regular basis in the recent 1 year had a higher risk of osteoporotic fracture than exclusive H2RA users (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.26–1.50).

Figure 2 shows the results of subgroup analysis by sex. After adjusting for all covariates, both men and women had statistically significant results with regard to the risk of osteoporotic fracture, for any use, ≥ 1 year of use, and regular use. In both men and women, the risk of osteoporotic fracture increased as the duration of use increased and as regular use increased (P for trend < 0.001, for all). The P-value for interaction was 0.502, 0.039, and 0.006 for any use, duration of use, and regular use, respectively. The effect of the duration of PPI use and regular use on the osteoporotic fracture risk differed according to sex.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the risk of osteoporotic fracture associated with PPI use compared to exclusive H2RA use according to sex. PPI, proton pump inhibitor; H2RA, histamine-2 receptor antagonist

Full size image

Figure 3 shows the duration of PPI use and regular use and the risk of osteoporotic fracture according to age group. The risk of osteoporotic fracture associated with any PPI use increased with age (all P for trend < 0.05). In all age groups, the risk of osteoporotic fracture increased with an increasing cumulative day of PPI use (p for trend: 50–79 years of age, < 0.001; ≥80 years of age = 0.01). When using PPI for more than 1 year, the osteoporotic fracture risk was highest in people over 80, but it was not statistically significant (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.99–3.18). In the 50s and 60s age groups, the osteoporotic fracture risk increased with regular use (p for trend < 0.001).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the risk of osteoporotic fracture associated with PPI use compared to exclusive H2RA use according to age. a Cumulative days of use, b Regular use. PPI, proton pump inhibitor; H2RA, histamine-2 receptor antagonist

Full size image

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk of osteoporotic fracture according to the use duration and regular use of PPIs by using the Korean NHIS data. In both men and women, the PPI use was significantly associated with increased risk of osteoporotic fractures, mainly when PPI was used for ≥ 1 year (adjusted OR: 1.42) and regularly for the recent 1 year (adjusted OR: 1.37). The risk of osteoporotic fracture increased by increasing the duration of PPI use and regular use.

Interpretation and comparison with other studies

Our results are consistent with those of previous studies suggesting that PPIs are associated with osteoporotic fracture. Yang et al. reported that the use of PPI for > 1 year in patients aged ≥50 years was associated with the risk of hip fracture and that the longer the duration of treatment, the greater the association with fracture [5]. A study in Denmark reported that the use of PPI was associated with all osteoporotic fractures, including hip and vertebral fractures, within 1 year [15]. In a Canadian study, PPI exposure for > 7 years was associated with osteoporotic fracture, and there was no significant association between the use of PPI for ≤6 years and the risk of osteoporotic fracture [31]. They did not adjust the major risk factors for fracture, such as low body mass index, alcohol consumption, and smoking, so their results may differ from our study results. Corley et al. reported that the use of PPI in adults aged > 18 years was associated with an increased risk of hip fracture, and suggested that the risk of osteoporotic fracture was reduced when the drug was discontinued [6]. In a recent study in the United States, the risk of hip fracture in men aged > 45 years has been reported to increase with longer use of PPI [21]. Another study reported that PPI use increases the risk of osteoporotic fracture in elderly people aged > 65 years [20]. It has also been reported that PPI is associated with fractures in hemodialysis patients at high risk of fracture [24].

Most of the studies reported the existence of an association between PPI use and osteoporotic fracture risk. However, it was difficult to make definite conclusions because the target country, target patient group, definition of PPI use, fracture site, and covariates varied across different studies. In many studies, information on medication use was dependent on the patients’ memory recall. Further, most of the studies were Western studies and only a few were reported in Asia. A study in Taiwan indicated that the use of > 29 defined daily doses of PPI was associated with hip fracture development [32]. Asian studies are important because Asian people differ from Westerners in bone mineral density, osteoporotic fracture prevalence [30]. Also, it has been reported that the pharmacodynamics of PPI differ between Asian and Western populations because many Asians have fewer gastric parietal cells and poor metabolism of PPI [29]. Therefore, this study was conducted on almost the entire Korean population, using the exact date of prescription in the claims data and with adjustments for a large number of covariates. In addition, we analyzed the effects of any use, cumulative use, and regular use of PPI on the osteoporotic fracture risk.

There are several mechanisms by which PPIs increase the risk of osteoporotic fractures. First, PPIs reduce gastric acid by inhibiting H+/K+-ATPase at the last stage of gastric acid production. Calcium solubility plays an important role in calcium absorption, and the acidic environment of the gastrointestinal tract promotes the release of ionized calcium from insoluble calcium salts [33]. PPIs inhibit acid secretion and increase the pH, which slows down the dissolution of calcium salt and, consequently, prevents calcium absorption. The lack of calcium in the bone may increase the risk of osteoporotic fracture in the long term [34]. A second mechanism may be the reduction of vitamin B12 absorption induced by PPI [7]. The acidity of the stomach is important for the absorption of vitamin B12 [35]. It has been reported that inhibition of gastric acid by PPI may inhibit the absorption of vitamin B12 [36]. Vitamin B12 deficiency can cause homocysteinemia, leading to bone loss through increased osteoclastic activity, reduced osteoblast activity, reduced collagen linking, and decreased bone formation [37]. Vitamin B12 is also an essential co-factor for DNA synthesis and cellular energy production [38]. Continuous vitamin B12 deficiency can cause reversible megaloblastic aplastic anemia and demyelinated neuropathy leading to gait and weakness, which can cause neurological dysfunctions such as cognitive and visual impairment [39]. Therefore, vitamin B12 deficiency due to PPI use may be a risk factor for osteoporotic fractures. The third mechanism may be the increase in gastrin levels. Gastric acid is reduced by the use of PPIs, and the gastrin level is increased by the feedback mechanism. Hypergastrinemia due to PPI use has been reported to cause hyperplasia of the parathyroid gland, and increased parathyroid hormone could induce a decrease in bone mineral density [40, 41]. Also, PPIs interfere with the active transport of magnesium and can cause osteoporotic fractures [42].

Strengths and limitations of this study

The first strength of this study is that we included a large number of patients using data from almost all Koreans. This study is also meaningful because it adds to the few Asian studies in the literature to date. Second, our study had a comparatively long observation period from 2006 to 2015. Third, the accuracy of drug use information over a long period is very high because the drug prescriptions were identified from NHIS claims data. Fourth, by using claims data and national health checkup data, various drugs and diseases affecting fracture could be used as covariates. In addition, the database allowed us to use accurate information without recall bias, which is common in retrospective studies.

Our study has some limitations. First, there was a possibility of residual confounding factors despite the attempt to adjust for factors influencing fracture. Due to the lack of data, we were unable to use lifestyle factors as covariates. The sources of residual confounding are also the lack of information regarding the disease severity and symptom severity of GERD and PUD, and the quality of care patients received in general by their healthcare providers. It is possible that healthcare providers using H2RA instead of PPI were more aware of the risk of PPI and were better educated regarding the management of geriatric patients. Second, we were not able to use medical records or imaging test results. Bone mineral density, a diagnostic parameter for osteoporosis, was also not available because this information is not included in the claims data. Third, our study outcome may include some fractures due to other causes, and may not include some osteoporotic fractures. The misclassification bias might not be eliminated.

Conclusion

This nationwide nested case-control study demonstrated that osteoporotic fracture risk increased when PPIs were used for an extended period (≥ 1 year) or regularly both in men and women. The adverse effects of PPI on the risk of osteoporotic fractures were increased by increasing the duration of PPI use. Our findings suggest that reducing the duration of PPI use or avoiding their use altogether in favor of H2RA may reduce the risk of the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures in older adults. Appropriate benefits and risk assessments should be performed when prescribing PPIs. To shorten the duration of PPI prescriptions, clinicians may educate patients on lifestyle modifications to improve GERD symptoms or prescribe alternative medications with low gastric acid suppression. Also, especially when prescribing PPI to patients at high risk for osteoporosis, physicians may consider educating patients to prevent osteoporotic fractures.

Availability of data and materials

Data is available from the Korea National Health Insurance Sharing Service Institutional Data Access / Ethics Committee (https://nhiss.nhis.or.kr/bd/ay/bdaya001iv.do) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Researchers can apply for the National Health Insurance data sharing service upon approval of the Institutional Review Board of their institution. After review of the Korea National Health Insurance Sharing Service Institutional Data Access / Ethics Committee, authors are required to pay a data access fee and confirm that other researchers will be able to access the data in the same manner as the authors.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

GERD:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

H2RA:

Histamine-2 receptor antagonist

HRT:

Hormone replacement therapy

OR:

Odds ratio

PPI:

Proton pump inhibitor

PUD:

Peptic ulcer disease

SSRIs:

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

TCAs:

Tricyclic antidepressants

References

  1. Hollingworth S, Duncan EL, Martin JH. Marked increase in proton pump inhibitors use in Australia. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(10):1019–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Haas JS, Chan AT, Giovannucci EL. Trends in prescription drug use among adults in the United States from 1999-2012. JAMA. 2015;314(17):1818–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Eusebi LH, Rabitti S, Artesiani ML, Gelli D, Montagnani M, Zagari RM, Bazzoli F. Proton pump inhibitors: risks of long-term use. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32(7):1295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hussain S, Siddiqui AN, Habib A, Hussain MS, Najmi AK. Proton pump inhibitors' use and risk of hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int. 2018;38(11):1999–2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang YX, Lewis JD, Epstein S, Metz DC. Long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy and risk of hip fracture. JAMA. 2006;296(24):2947–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Corley DA, Kubo A, Zhao W, Quesenberry C. Proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists are associated with hip fractures among at-risk patients. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(1):93–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis JR, Barre D, Zhu K, Ivey KL, Lim EM, Hughes J, Prince RL. Long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy and falls and fractures in elderly women: a prospective cohort study. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(11):2489–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Hoorn MMC, Tett SE, de Vries OJ, Dobson AJ, Peeters G. The effect of dose and type of proton pump inhibitor use on risk of fractures and osteoporosis treatment in older Australian women: a prospective cohort study. Bone. 2015;81:675–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen ND, Ahlborg HG, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Residual lifetime risk of fractures in women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(6):781–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leibson CL, Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Ransom JE, Melton LJ. Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(10):1644–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chrischilles EA, Butler CD, Davis CS, Wallace RB. A model of lifetime osteoporosis impact. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(10):2026–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Cooper C. Does a fracture at one site predict later fractures at other sites? A British cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(8):624–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Randell AG, Nguyen TV, Bhalerao N, Silverman SL, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA. Deterioration in quality of life following hip fracture: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(5):460–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Proton pump inhibitors, histamine H2 receptor antagonists, and other antacid medications and the risk of fracture. Calcif Tissue Int. 2006;79(2):76–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roux C, Briot K, Gossec L, Kolta S, Blenk T, Felsenberg D, Reid DM, Eastell R, Gluer CC. Increase in vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women using omeprazole. Calcif Tissue Int. 2009;84(1):13–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fraser LA, Leslie WD, Targownik LE, Papaioannou A, Adachi JD, CaMos Research G. The effect of proton pump inhibitors on fracture risk: report from the Canadian multicenter osteoporosis study. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(4):1161–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reyes C, Formiga F, Coderch M, Hoyo J, Ferriz G, Casanovas J, Monteserin R, Brotons C, Rojas M, Moral I. Use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of fragility hip fracture in a Mediterranean region. Bone. 2013;52(2):557–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moberg LM, Nilsson PM, Samsioe G, Borgfeldt C. Use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and history of earlier fracture are independent risk factors for fracture in postmenopausal women. The WHILA study. Maturitas. 2014;78(4):310–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ding J, Heller DA, Ahern FM, Brown TV. The relationship between proton pump inhibitor adherence and fracture risk in the elderly. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;94(6):597–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Adams AL, Black MH, Zhang JL, Shi JM, Jacobsen SJ. Proton-pump inhibitor use and hip fractures in men: a population-based case-control study. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24(4):286–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaye JA, Jick H. Proton pump inhibitor use and risk of hip fractures in patients without major risk factors. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28(8):951–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee J, Youn K, Choi NK, Lee JH, Kang D, Song HJ, Park BJ. A population-based case-control study: proton pump inhibition and risk of hip fracture by use of bisphosphonate. J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(9):1016–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fusaro M, D'Arrigo G, Pitino A, Iervasi G, Tentori F, Robinson B, Aghi A, Bieber B, McCullogh K, Fabris F, et al. Increased risk of bone fractures in hemodialysis patients treated with proton pump inhibitors in real world: results from the Dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS). J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(12):2238–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu EW, Blackwell T, Ensrud KE, Hillier TA, Lane NE, Orwoll E, Bauer DC. Acid-suppressive medications and risk of bone loss and fracture in older adults. Calcif Tissue Int. 2008;83(4):251–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gray SL, LaCroix AZ, Larson J, Robbins J, Cauley JA, Manson JE, Chen Z. Proton pump inhibitor use, hip fracture, and change in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(9):765–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Pouwels S, Lalmohamed A, Souverein P, Cooper C, Veldt BJ, Leufkens HG, de Boer A, van Staa T, de Vries F. Use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of hip/femur fracture: a population-based case-control study. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(3):903–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cea Soriano L, Ruigomez A, Johansson S, Garcia Rodriguez LA. Study of the association between hip fracture and acid-suppressive drug use in a UK primary care setting. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34(6):570–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leontiadis GI, Sharma VK, Howden CW. Systematic review and meta-analysis: enhanced efficacy of proton-pump inhibitor therapy for peptic ulcer bleeding in Asia--a post hoc analysis from the Cochrane collaboration. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21(9):1055–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Park JH, Song YM, Sung J, Lee K, Kim YS, Park YS. Genetic influence on bone mineral density in Korean twins and families: the healthy twin study. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(4):1343–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Targownik LE, Lix LM, Metge CJ, Prior HJ, Leung S, Leslie WD. Use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of osteoporosis-related fractures. CMAJ. 2008;179(4):319–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chiu HF, Huang YW, Chang CC, Yang CY. Use of proton pump inhibitors increased the risk of hip fracture: a population-based case-control study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(11):1131–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Koop H. Review article: metabolic consequences of long-term inhibition of acid secretion by omeprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1992;6(4):399–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fournier MR, Targownik LE, Leslie WD. Proton pump inhibitors, osteoporosis, and osteoporosis-related fractures. Maturitas. 2009;64(1):9–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Festen HP. Intrinsic factor secretion and cobalamin absorption. Physiology and pathophysiology in the gastrointestinal tract. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1991;188:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Howden CW. Vitamin B12 levels during prolonged treatment with proton pump inhibitors. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;30(1):29–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang YX, Metz DC. Safety of proton pump inhibitor exposure. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(4):1115–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. O'Leary F, Samman S. Vitamin B12 in health and disease. Nutrients. 2010;2(3):299–316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Stabler SP. Clinical practice. Vitamin B12 deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):149–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gagnemo-Persson R, Håkanson R, Sundler F, Persson P. Growth of the parathyroid glands in omeprazole-treated chickens. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994;29(6):493–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gagnemo-Persson R, Samuelsson A, Hâkanson R, Persson P. Chicken parathyroid hormone gene expression in response to gastrin, omeprazole, ergocalciferol, and restricted food intake. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997;61(3):210–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fusaro M, Giannini S, Gallieni M. Adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors in chronic kidney disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(6):866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by Korean National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency Grant (NA17–004). The funding body had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Joo-Hyun Park and Jessie Lee these two authors equally contributed to this study as first authors.

  2. Do-Hoon Kim and Jinnie Rhee co-corresponding authors equally contributed to this study.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 123, Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, 15355, Republic of Korea

    Joo-Hyun Park & Do-Hoon Kim

  2. National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Jessie Lee, Su-Yeon Yu & Jinnie Rhee

  3. Department of Biostatics, Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Jin-Hyung Jung

  4. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Kyungdo Han

Authors
  1. Joo-Hyun Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessie Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Su-Yeon Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jin-Hyung Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kyungdo Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Do-Hoon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jinnie Rhee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D-HK and JR designed the study in collaboration with J-HP, S-YY and JL. J-HJ and KDH analyzed the data. J-HP and JR drafted the manuscript. All authors interpreted the data, revised the manuscript and approved the final version for submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Do-Hoon Kim or Jinnie Rhee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All research procedures and ethical aspects were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (approval no. 17–011). Informed consent was waived by the IRB because the KNHIS dataset was constructed after anonymization, based on the strict confidentiality guidelines of the Korean Government.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, JH., Lee, J., Yu, SY. et al. Comparing proton pump inhibitors with histamin-2 receptor blockers regarding the risk of osteoporotic fractures: a nested case-control study of more than 350,000 Korean patients with GERD and peptic ulcer disease. BMC Geriatr 20, 407 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01794-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01794-3

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us