Skip to main content
Download PDF

A longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of neurodegenerative and small vessel disease, and clinical cognitive trajectories in non demented patients with transient ischemic attack: the PREVENT study

BMC Geriatrics volume 18, Article number: 163 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Late-life cognitive decline, caused by progressive neuronal loss leading to brain atrophy years before symptoms are detected, is expected to double in Canada over the next two decades. Cognitive impairment in late life is attributed to vascular and lifestyle related risk factors in mid-life in a substantial proportion of cases (50%), thereby providing an opportunity for effective prevention of cognitive decline if incipient disease is detected earlier. Patients presenting with transient ischemic attack (TIA) commonly display some degree of cognitive impairment and are at a 4-fold increased risk of dementia. In the Predementia Neuroimaging of Transient Ischemic Attack (PREVENT) study, we will address what disease processes (i.e., Alzheimer’s vs. vascular disease) lead to neurodegeneration, brain atrophy, and cognitive decline, and whether imaging measurements of brain iron accumulation using quantitative susceptibility mapping predicts subsequent brain atrophy and cognitive decline.

Methods

A total of 440 subjects will be recruited for this study with 220 healthy subjects and 220 TIA patients. Early Alzheimer’s pathology will be determined by cerebrospinal fluid samples (including tau, a marker of neuronal injury, and amyloid β1–42) and by MR measurements of iron accumulation, a marker for Alzheimer’s-related neurodegeneration. Small vessel disease will be identified by changes in white matter lesion volume. Predictors of advanced rates of cerebral and hippocampal atrophy at 1 and 3 years will include in vivo Alzheimer’s disease pathology markers, and MRI measurements of brain iron accumulation and small vessel disease. Clinical and cognitive function will be assessed annually post-baseline for a period of 5-years using a clinical questionnaire and a battery of neuropsychological tests, respectively.

Discussion

The PREVENT study expects to demonstrate that TIA patients have increased early progressive rates of cerebral brain atrophy after TIA, before cognitive decline can be clinically detected. By developing and optimizing high-level machine learning models based on clinical data, image-based (quantitative susceptibility mapping, regional brain, and white matter lesion volumes) features, and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, PREVENT will provide a timely opportunity to identify individuals at greatest risk of late-life cognitive decline early in the course of disease, supporting future therapeutic strategies for the promotion of healthy aging.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cognitive impairment late in life is commonly caused by progressive neuronal loss related to two dominant diseases, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and small vessel cerebrovascular disease (i.e. vascular dementia; VaD), both causing brain atrophy years before clinical symptoms are detected. As dementia is attributed to vascular and life-style related risk factors in mid-life in a substantial proportion of patients (50%), there is an opportunity to modify these factors if incipient disease is detected earlier [1]. Transient ischemic attack (TIA; incidence 0.37–1.1 per 1000) [2, 3], is associated with a 4-fold increase in dementia over the general population [4,5,6]. Therefore, TIA patients are a potential target for early modification of incipient disease processes that precede cognitive impairment guided by biologically relevant markers such as amyloid beta 1–42/ tau, whole brain and sub-structure atrophy, small vessel disease markers, and increased free iron. The Predementia Neuroimaging of Transient Ischemic Attack (PREVENT) study will focus on quantifying these biomarkers using advanced serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), neuropsychological assessments, APOE genotyping, and longitudinal clinical data. Specifically, PREVENT will examine what combination of pathological processes and risk factors lead to cognitive decline after TIA.

Methods

PREVENT is a prospective, single-center longitudinal study. To achieve a 30% group effect size on annualized rates of cerebral brain atrophy, N = 220 TIA patients and N = 220 healthy controls will receive clinical, neuropsychological, fluid biomarker, and MR assessments at pre-specified time points. The frequency and duration of events is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Schedule of Events
Full size table

Patient and control subject populations

The inclusion criteria for the TIA patient cohort are: 1) First documented TIA as defined by the following: resolved symptoms attributable to the anterior circulation (motor, speech, monocular visual loss), or posterior circulation (two or more of: ataxia, diplopia, vertigo, hemi-weakness, hemianopia) [2]; 2) no dementia as defined by National Institute of Aging-Alzheimer Association Criteria [7]; 3) clinical brain MR within 10 days of TIA symptoms to determine presence of diffusion-weighted image (DWI) lesion; 4) an age range between 45 and 75 years; and 5) fluency in English language.

Patient exclusion criteria are as follows: 1) persistence of stroke symptoms > 24 h [2]; 2) dementia as defined by the National Institute of Aging-Alzheimer Association Criteria [7]; 3) other central nervous system disease (e.g. MS), alcoholism, substance abuse, sedatives, antipsychotic medications and history of psychiatric illness; 4) contraindication to MR imaging, and other comorbidities that could significantly interfere with cognitive performance and follow-up (e.g., recent coronary artery bypass surgery (within 6 months), severe ischemic heart disease, heart failure, poorly controlled diabetes, renal or liver failure etc.).

Healthy controls will include volunteers from the community, and spouses of patients. Exclusion to participation includes prior stroke or TIA, dementia, co-morbid disease etc. as per patient exclusion criteria.

Data collection

Baseline evaluation (time point: Year 0; Y0) will include clinical review, fasting cholesterol, glucose, and renal function tests. Treatments for hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, anti-thrombotic agents, and other medications that could influence cognition such as sedatives, anxiolytics, or psychotropic medications will be determined. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotyping will be performed; the APOE ε4 allele is a risk factor for AD and VaD [8]. Obstructive sleep apnea may affect cognition and will be screened [9]. Blood pressure (BP) measurement will include two sitting BP measurements taken 5 minutes apart. At enrollment, patients and healthy controls will have home BP monitoring training and will perform three readings per day (waking, mid-morning, and evening) with a Bluetooth enabled, telemetric system (A&D Model UA 767BT) during the first month of recruitment [10]. All TIA patients will be managed according to current stroke prevention guidelines [11]. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for AD biomarkers, amyloid β1–42 and tau, will be collected according to a standardized procedure [12, 13]. The PREVENT study consent informs the participant that all results from biological tests (i.e. APOE) will not be disclosed to the patient or to the patient’s general practitioner. Participants will be approached about brain donation.

Imaging acquisition

At study entry (Y0) patients will have MR scan as a standard of clinical care within 1–2 days of physician assessment, and then repeated at 1 (Y1) and 3 years (Y3). Healthy controls will have MR scan at the same time points (Y0, Y1, Y3). DWI will be performed to detect evidence of diffusion lesion after TIA (up to 30%) [14]. The pertinent biological imaging targets of the standard MR imaging acquisition are summarized in Table 2. The absolute brain and hippocampal volume change between Y0, Y1, and Y3 will be calculated from T1-weighted images with SIENA [15] and FIRST [16, 17] part of FSL software package [18, 19]. At baseline and follow up, FLAIR images will be registered to high-resolution T1 images using a rigid transformation and optimization of the mutual information. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) measurements of regional brain iron accumulation will be acquired using methodology developed and published by the Calgary Image Processing and Analysis Center (CIPAC) [20].

Table 2 PREVENT imaging comprehensive dementia protocol < 20 min of scan time
Full size table

Neuropsychological assessment

Performed at baseline (within 10 days of onset in TIA patient) and then annually by a trained research assistant (Table 3). The cognitive tests are designed to measure change over time, have been selected to minimize floor and ceiling effects, can distinguish normal aging from prodromal dementia, and will be rotated to reduce practice effects. These tests are consistent with harmonization standards for vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) [21].

Table 3 PREVENT Neuropsychological Battery
Full size table

Power analyses

The PREVENT study will recruit 220 TIA patients to participate in this study and compare them to 220 controls, which is inclusive of 20% attrition rate in the whole sample, informed by our preliminary data and by other well documented longitudinal studies [22,23,24]. The study is powered based on multiple linear regressions of the association between the primary outcome of interest, first year cerebral atrophy rate (R1), and group effect, after adjusting for other socio-demographic, clinical, and vascular risk factors, and other potential confounders. With a sample size of 440, the study will have at least 85% power to detect a 30% group effect size (i.e. TIA versus control) following baseline measurement and follow up measurement taken at Y1, informed by similar rates of whole brain atrophy in published reports of prodromal dementia [25, 26], and our pilot data [27, 28]. This sample size will provide at least 90% power to detect a standardized difference of 0.35 between TIA and control groups for change over time on the WHO/UCLA AVLT (verbal memory) and Trails A and B tests (processing speed/executive function).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis will include descriptive statistics to compare the mean, median, standard deviations, and frequency distribution s of all variables.

A mixed repeated measure regression model will be used to model the association between overall cognitive domain specific and composite z-score variable measures at baseline, 1 year, and 3 years and patient group (TIA versus healthy control), after adjusting for demographic characteristics, baseline cognitive function, vascular risk factors mentioned before, in vivo biomarkers, and patient interactions as fixed effects covariates. The size of the standardized regression coefficients associated with each predictor will be used to quantify its relative importance in predicting rate of cognitive decline in patients versus controls. A random intercept will be included to account for subject-specific variation in cognitive scores. The 95% confidence intervals and the corresponding p-values for adjusted group effect on overall cognitive outcomes will be estimated.

Finally, we will develop novel prediction models based on machine learning and generalized estimating equation models to identify individual TIA patients with a high likelihood to develop cognitive decline. The basic idea of this is to predict occurrence of cognitive decline using prediction models developed and trained on the longitudinal data with known clinical outcome (cognitive decline yes / no), which can then be used to predict cognitive impairment in new patients based on the same features used for training of the high-level machine learning model. More precisely, we will develop prediction models based on random forest [29], support vector machines [30], deep neural networks [31], and quadratic inference function classifiers for predicting the occurrence of dementia using available baseline information such as cognitive test results, blood and CSF parameters, as well as quantitative image-based biomarkers such as regional QSM values, volumetric brain and hippocampal values, and white matter lesion (WML) load. The evaluation of the prediction models based on the TIA and control cohorts will be conducted using well-established cross validation techniques. This means that we will, for example, exclude one patient with known dementia outcome from the training set. After this, the prediction model trained based on the remaining patients can be used to predict dementia outcome for the one patient not part of the training set and the predicted outcome can be compared to the real outcome. By iteratively repeating this so-called leave-one-out cross validation for all patients available, the accuracy of the prediction model can be determined and used to identify the optimal high-level machine learning method for this purpose.

Discussion

In light of social and economic burdens, early identification of high-risk patients for dementia is the most important step in prevention and postponement [32, 33]. With no cure and recent clinical trial failures, it is becoming increasingly important that trials must be redesigned with a focus on high-risk populations and standardized biomarkers, which include clinical, demographic, imaging and neuropsychological considerations. The PREVENT study proposes the early identification of people at risk for late-life cognitive decline as the single most important approach for trial designs. To date, studies have established a link between vascular risk and stroke, and late life cognitive impairment but overlooked fundamental challenges such as the efficacy of vascular reduction treatment (antihypertensive treatments [34,35,36,37,38], diabetes management, and cholesterol lowering therapy [39]) on slowing cognitive decline, thus leading to inconclusive results. Special consideration needs to be given to identifying patients at the highest risk of dementia (i.e. TIA patients) since these patients are most likely to benefit from earlier intervention [40] before symptoms manifest, and from therapies that focus on vascular risk reduction [34]. Intervention trials such as the Finnish Geriatric Interventions to Prevent Cognitive Impairment (FINGER) study and the Prevention of Dementia by Intensive Vascular care (preDIVA) trial, show that focusing on diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk management as a multi-domain treatment approach improves or maintains cognitive function in at risk elderly when compared to healthy controls [24, 41]. The potential mechanisms of disease progression (AD, vascular disease or both), response of these multi-domain therapeutic interventions, and their long-term benefits remain unknown [42]. However, epidemiological studies show that the incidence or age specific prevalence of dementia has declined in the past 20 years [43,44,45], implying that the risk of dementia is modifiable through vascular risk reduction therapies. The early identification of patients at greatest risk of cognitive decline, by measuring change in cognition, is an important issue to be addressed by the PREVENT study.

The PREVENT study is expected to support the concept that rate of cerebral atrophy is a meaningful measure of disease progression that precedes cognitive decline and provide justification for the use of rates of cerebral atrophy as an outcome in pre-clinical dementia prevention trials. The PREVENT study in its design will stratify dementia risk according to biological markers of neurodegeneration, and small vessel cerebrovascular disease. We anticipate that the PREVENT study will demonstrate the temporal order of biomarker (in vivo AD and small vessel disease features) change as shown in the figure below with more advanced decline of brain volume occurring in order as follows: Alzheimer’s pathology plus cerebrovascular disease, Alzheimer’s disease in isolation, small vessel cerebrovascular disease and low vascular risk group without identifiable in vivo markers of either vascular disease or AD, all starting before clinical symptoms manifest (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

PREVENT stratification of dementia risk by biomarker profile for future dementia prevention clinical trials

Full size image

We anticipate that recruitment will be the most important challenge to the feasibility of the PREVENT Study. Clinical evaluations, cognitive tests, and the MRI protocol have been designed to minimize patient fatigue, and will be only performed yearly (inclusive of year 5). Recruitment is ahead of schedule providing powerful evidence that enrollment of TIA patients and healthy controls will be complete by the end of 2018. We are actively recruiting from a repository of healthy community volunteers (Calgary Normative Study). We anticipate that by the end of 2019 we will have completed our primary outcome measure of early rates of brain atrophy (R1). By 2021, secondary outcome measures of rates of brain atrophy will have been completed 3 years (R2) and biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease in WML will have been analyzed. All patients will have completed 4 years of serial neuropsychological assessments.

Our sample size calculations for the PREVENT study are inclusive of an estimated attrition rate of 20%, which is similar to drop out rates in other longitudinal studies of cerebrovascular disease and cognition [46]. Potential bias of our results through the withdrawal or death of subjects at highest risk of dementia will be mitigated by the age inclusion criteria (45–75). Moreover, unlike stroke patients, TIA patients will be able to physically and cognitively comply with serial cognitive and MR imaging. All study participants will be under regular surveillance during clinical reassessments for the development of cardiovascular events and death. Confirmed cases of recurrent stroke will be excluded from our primary outcome analysis; recurrence is anticipated to be low (< 2%) [47].

A proportion of PREVENT subjects may have diffusion-weighted lesions (possibly up to 30%) [14], but previous studies have shown that presence of such small silent infarcts may not explain the cognitive profile [48], nor the progressive cognitive decline [49], perhaps implicating neurodegenerative and inflammatory processes [50, 51]. The presence of DWI lesions may be another predictor of progressive brain atrophy. Exploring disease mechanisms implicated in the recently reported interactions between incident stroke and persistent progressive cognitive decline will be important to furthering our understanding of the disease interaction of neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular processes on cognitive decline [49].

We have set rigorous standards for maintaining the highest quality MR images, including the application of similar benchmark standards used by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging group (adni.loni.usc.edu). Objective quality assurance to detect image distortion will be diligently followed to measure properties that include grading calibration, image contrast, and signal to noise ratio. Any scans that fail quality control will be repeated within 4 weeks.

The PREVENT study will be the first critical step for identifying individuals at increased risk of late life cognitive decline. Future steps will target individuals at the highest risk of dementia before symptoms develop, thereby identifying an enriched disease group to test preventative and disease modifying strategies in clinical trials that aim to reduce the microscopic brain tissue loss over a relatively short period of time, thereby optimizing the opportunity for preventing dementia in the future.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

APOE:

Apolipoprotein E

BP:

Blood pressure

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

DWI:

Diffusion weighted imaging

FINGER:

Finnish Geriatric Interventions to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability study

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MS:

Multiple sclerosis

PREVENT:

Predementia Neuroimaging of Transient Ischemic Attack study

QSM:

Quantitative susceptibility mapping

TIA:

Transient ischemic attack

VaD:

Vascular Dementia

VCI:

Vascular cognitive impairment

WHO/UCLA AVLT:

World Health Organization/University of California Los Angeles auditory verbal learning test

WML:

White matter lesion

References

  1. 1.

    Norton S, Matthews FE, Barnes DE, Yaffe K, Brayne C. Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet. Neurol. [Internet]. 2014;13:788–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25030513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW, Alberts MJ, Chaturvedi S, Feldmann E, et al. Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardio. Stroke. [Internet]. 2009;40:2276–2293. Available from: papers3://publication/doi/https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.192218

  3. 3.

    Li L, Yiin GS, Geraghty OC, Schulz UG, Kuker W, Mehta Z, et al. Incidence, outcome, risk factors, and long-term prognosis of cryptogenic transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke: A population-based study. Lancet Neurol. [Internet]. Li et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND; 2015;14:903–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00132-5.

  4. 4.

    Pendlebury S, Chen P-J, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM, Study O. Long-term risk of dementia after TIA and stroke: current estimates from a large population-based study. Cerebrovasc. Dis. [Internet]. 2013;35:187. Available from: https://www.rdm.ox.ac.uk/publications/448620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Li J-Q, Tan L, Wang H-F, Tan M-S, Tan L, Xu W, et al. Risk factors for predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry [Internet]. 2016:1–9. Available from: http://jnnp.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/jnnp-2014-310095

  6. 6.

    Heath CA, Mercer SW, Guthrie B. Vascular comorbidities in younger people with dementia: a cross-sectional population-based study of 616 245 middle-aged people in Scotland. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry [Internet]. 2014;jnnp-2014-309033-. Available from: http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/early/2014/11/18/jnnp-2014-309033

  7. 7.

    GM MK, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers. Dement. [Internet]. 2011;7:263–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21514250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Liu Y, Yu J-T, Wang H-F, Han P-R, Tan C-C, Wang C, et al. APOE genotype and neuroimaging markers of Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry [Internet]. 2015;86:127–134. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24838911

  9. 9.

    Johns MW. Daytime sleepiness, snoring, and obstructive sleep apnea. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Chest [Internet]. 1993;103:30–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8417909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Webb AJS, Rothwell PM. Physiological correlates of beat-to-beat, ambulatory, and day-to-day home blood pressure variability after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. Stroke [Internet]. 2014;45:533–8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24407950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Coutts SB, Wein TH, Lindsay MP, Buck B, Cote R, Ellis P, et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: secondary prevention of stroke guidelines, update 2014. Int. J. Stroke [Internet]. 2015;10:282–91. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25535808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lista S, Garaci FG, Ewers M, Teipel S, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, et al. CSF Aβ1–42 combined with neuroimaging biomarkers in the early detection, diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers. Dement. [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;10:381–392. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23850330

  13. 13.

    Mattsson N, Insel P, Nosheny R, Zetterberg H, Trojanowski JQ, Shaw LM, et al. CSF protein biomarkers predicting longitudinal reduction of CSF β-amyloid42 in cognitively healthy elders. Transl. Psychiatry [Internet]. 2013;3:e293. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23962923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Brazzelli M, Chappell FM, Miranda H, Shuler K, Dennis M, PAG S, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging and diagnosis of transient ischemic attack. Ann. Neurol. [Internet]. 2014;75:67–76. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24085376

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Smith SM, Zhang Y, Jenkinson M, Chen J, Matthews PM, Federico A, et al. Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2002;17:479–89. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12482100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nugent AC, Luckenbaugh DA, Wood SE, Bogers W, Zarate CA, Drevets WC. Automated subcortical segmentation using FIRST: test-retest reliability, interscanner reliability, and comparison to manual segmentation. Hum Brain Mapp [Internet]. 2013;34:2313–2329. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22815187

  17. 17.

    Thomann PA, Wüstenberg T, Nolte HM, Menzel PB, Wolf RC, Essig M, et al. Hippocampal and entorhinal cortex volume decline in cognitively intact elderly. Psychiatry Res. [Internet]. 2013;211:31–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23168382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, TEJ B, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2004;23(Suppl 1):S208–19. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15501092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2012;62:782–790. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21979382

  20. 20.

    Lauzon ML, McCreary CR, McLean DA, Salluzzi M, Frayne R. Quantitative susceptibility mapping at 3 T: comparison of acquisition methodologies. NMR Biomed [Internet]. 2017;30. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26887659

  21. 21.

    Hachinski V, Iadecola C, Petersen RC, Breteler MM, Nyenhuis DL, Black SE, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian stroke network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke [Internet]. 2006;37:2220–2241. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16917086

  22. 22.

    Gouw AA, van der Flier WM, Fazekas F, van Straaten ECW, Pantoni L, Poggesi A, et al. Progression of white matter hyperintensities and incidence of new lacunes over a 3-year period: the Leukoaraiosis and disability study. Stroke [Internet]. 2008;39:1414–1420. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18323505

  23. 23.

    Madureira S, Verdelho A, Ferro J, Basile A-M, Chabriat H, Erkinjuntti T, et al. Development of a neuropsychological battery for the Leukoaraiosis and disability in the elderly study (LADIS): experience and baseline data. Neuroepidemiology [Internet]. 2006;27:101–116. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16943684

  24. 24.

    Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, Levälahti E, Ahtiluoto S, Antikainen R, et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) [Internet]. 2015;385:2255–63. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25771249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Evans MC, Barnes J, Nielsen C, Kim LG, Clegg SL, Blair M, et al. Volume changes in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: cognitive associations. Eur Radiol [Internet]. 2010;20:674–682. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19760240

  26. 26.

    Ahmed RM, Paterson RW, Warren JD, Zetterberg H, O’Brien JT, Fox NC, et al. Biomarkers in dementia: clinical utility and new directions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:1426–34. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25261571.

  27. 27.

    Munir MA, Zamboni G, Griffanti L, Zhang Y, Tariq S, Smith EE, et al. TIA and Minor Stroke Patients Experience Higher Brain Atrophy During Preclinical Stages. Tokyo. 2015; Available from: http://www2.convention.co.jp/vas-cog-world2015/program/Program_Poster.pdf.

  28. 28.

    Munir MA, Zamboni G, Griffanti L, Zhang Y, Tariq S, Smith EE, et al. Cognitive decline at 3 years in minor stroke and TIA patients. Tokyo. 2015; Available from: http://www2.convention.co.jp/vas-cog-world2015/program/Program_Poster.pdf

  29. 29.

    Lebedev A V, Westman E, Van Westen GJP, Kramberger MG, Lundervold A, Aarsland D, et al. Random Forest ensembles for detection and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease with a good between-cohort robustness. NeuroImage. Clin. [Internet]. 2014;6:115–125. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379423.

  30. 30.

    Ferreira LK, Rondina JM, Kubo R, Ono CR, Leite CC, Smid J, et al. Support vector machine-based classification of neuroimages in Alzheimer’s disease: direct comparison of FDG-PET, rCBF-SPECT and MRI data acquired from the same individuals. Rev Bras Psiquiatr [Internet]. 2017; Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462017005017101&lng=en&tlng=en.

  31. 31.

    Hosseini-Asl E, Gimel’farb G, El-Baz A. Alzheimer’s disease diagnostics by a deeply supervised adaptable 3D convolutional network. 2016; Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00556

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Prince M, Albanese E, Guerchet M, Prina M. World Alzheimer report 2014 dementia and risk reduction: an analysis of protective and modifiable factors. London Alzheimer’s Dis. Int. [Internet]. 2014:104. Available from: https://www.alz.co.uk/research/WorldAlzheimerReport2014.pdf

  33. 33.

    Haan MN, Wallace R. Can dementia be prevented? Brain aging in a population-based context. Annu Rev Public Health [Internet]. 2004;25:1–24. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15015910

  34. 34.

    Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group. JAMA [Internet]. 1991;265:3255–3264. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2046107

  35. 35.

    Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, Celis H, Arabidze GG, Birkenhäger WH, et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators Lancet (London, England) [Internet]. 1997;350:757–64. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9297994

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tzourio C, Anderson C, Chapman N, Woodward M, Neal B, MacMahon S, et al. Effects of blood pressure lowering with perindopril and indapamide therapy on dementia and cognitive decline in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Arch. Intern. Med. [Internet]. 2003;163:1069–75. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12742805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lithell H, Hansson L, Skoog I, Elmfeldt D, Hofman A, Olofsson B, et al. The study on cognition and prognosis in the elderly (SCOPE): principal results of a randomized double-blind intervention trial. J Hypertens [Internet]. 2003;21:875–886. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12714861

  38. 38.

    Peters R, Beckett N, Forette F, Tuomilehto J, Clarke R, Ritchie C, et al. Incident dementia and blood pressure lowering in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial cognitive function assessment (HYVET-COG): a double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Lancet. Neurol. [Internet]. 2008;7:683–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18614402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mielke MM, Zandi PP, Sjögren M, Gustafson D, Ostling S, Steen B, et al. High total cholesterol levels in late life associated with a reduced risk of dementia. Neurology [Internet]. 2005;64:1689–1695. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15911792

  40. 40.

    Schneider LS. Reduce vascular risk to prevent dementia? Lancet [Internet]. 2016;388:738–40. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673616311291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    van Charante EPM, Richard E, Eurelings LS, van Dalen J-W, Ligthart SA, van Bussel EF, et al. Effectiveness of a 6-year multidomain vascular care intervention to prevent dementia (preDIVA): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2016;388:797–805. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30950-3.

  42. 42.

    Tariq S, Barber PA. Dementia risk and prevention by targeting modifiable vascular risk factors. J. Neurochem. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Sep 9]; Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jnc.14132

  43. 43.

    Prince M, Ali G-C, Guerchet M, Prina AM, Albanese E, Wu Y-T, et al. Recent global trends in the prevalence and incidence of dementia, and survival with dementia. Alzheimers. Res. Ther. [Internet]. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy. 2016;8:23. Available from: http://alzres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13195-016-0188-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Qiu C, Kivipelto M, von Strauss E. Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: occurrence, determinants, and strategies toward intervention. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. [internet], Available from. 2009;11:111–28. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19585947

  45. 45.

    Langa KM. Is the risk of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia declining? Alzheimer’s Res. {&} Ther. [Internet]. 2015;7:34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-015-0118-1%5Cnhttp://alzres.com/content/7/1/34%5Cnhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4374373&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

  46. 46.

    Mandzia JL, Smith EE, Horton M, Hanly P, Barber PA, Godzwon C, et al. Imaging and baseline predictors of cognitive performance in minor ischemic stroke and patients with transient ischemic attack at 90 days. Stroke. 2016;47:726–31. Available from: http://stroke.ahajournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011507

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Coutts SB, Simon JE, Eliasziw M, Sohn C-H, Hill MD, Barber PA, et al. Triaging transient ischemic attack and minor stroke patients using acute magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol [Internet]. 2005;57:848–854. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15929051

  48. 48.

    van Rooij FG, Schaapsmeerders P, Maaijwee NAM, van Duijnhoven DAHJ, de Leeuw F-E, Kessels RPC, et al. Persistent cognitive impairment after transient ischemic attack. Stroke [Internet]. 2014;45:2270–2274. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25070959

  49. 49.

    Levine DA, Galecki AT, Langa KM, Unverzagt FW, Kabeto MU, Giordani B, et al. Trajectory of cognitive decline after incident stroke. JAMA [Internet]. 2015;314:41–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151265

  50. 50.

    Whitehead SN, Cheng G, Hachinski VC, Cechetto DF. Progressive increase in infarct size, neuroinflammation, and cognitive deficits in the presence of high levels of amyloid. Stroke [Internet]. 2007;38:3245–3250. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17962591

  51. 51.

    Amtul Z, Nikolova S, Gao L, Keeley RJ, Bechberger JF, Fisher AL, et al. Comorbid Aβ toxicity and stroke: hippocampal atrophy, pathology, and cognitive deficit. Neurobiol. Aging [Internet]. 2014;35:1605–14. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24491422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Arnett JA, Labovitz SS. Effect of physical layout in performance of the trail making test. Psychol Assess [Internet] 1995;7:220–221. Available from: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/1040-3590.7.2.220

  53. 53.

    Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. Third. Sherman EMS, Spreen O, editors. Oxford University Press; 2006.

  54. 54.

    Maj M, D’Elia L, Satz P, Janssen R, Zaudig M, Uchiyama C, et al. Evaluation of two new neuropsychological tests designed to minimize cultural bias in the assessment of HIV-1 seropositive persons: a WHO study. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. [Internet]. 1993;8:123–35. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14589670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Benedict RHB. Brief visuospatial memory test-revised. PAR; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol [Internet]. 1935;18:643–62. Available from: http://content.apa.org/journals/xge/18/6/643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Royall D, Cordes J, Polk M. CLOX: an executive clock drawing task. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry [Internet]. 1998;64:588–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2170069/pdf/v064p00588.pdf

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kaufman AS, Lichtenberger EO. Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence. 3rd ed. In: Wiley; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Lansing AE, Ivnik RJ, Cullum CM, Randolph C. An empirically derived short form of the Boston naming test. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. [Internet]. 1999;14:481–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14590575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Erdodi LA, Tyson BT, Abeare CA, Lichtenstein JD, Pelletier CL, Rai JK, et al. The BDAE complex ideational material???A measure of receptive language or performance validity? Psychol. Inj. Law [Internet]. Psychological Injury and Law; 2016;9:112–120. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-016-9254-6

  61. 61.

    Blair JR, Spreen O. Predicting premorbid IQ: a revision of the national adult reading test. Clin Neuropsychol [Internet] 1989;3:129–136. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854048908403285

  62. 62.

    Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Nasreddine Z, Phillips N, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Colllin I, et al. The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc [Internet]. 2005;53:695–9. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x/full

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Larner AJ. Dementia in clinical practice: a neurological perspective: studies in the dementia clinic: Springer; 2012.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants and the research staff at the Calgary Stroke Program, Calgary Image Processing and Analysis Centre, Calgary Normative Study and Seaman Family MR Research Center for their cooperation and support.

Funding

The present study is supported by Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, operating grant (G-16-00012595). The Calgary Normative data used as part of the normal controls portion of this study was funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (220064). We thank Linda Andersen, Cheryl McCreary, and Marina Salluzzi for enabling access to these data.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 - 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Sana Tariq, Christopher D. d’Esterre, Eric E. Smith, Shelagh B. Coutts & Philip A. Barber

  2. Seaman Family MR Center, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Sana Tariq, Tolulope T. Sajobi, Eric E. Smith, Richard Frayne, Shelagh B. Coutts, Nils D. Forkert & Philip A. Barber

  3. Department of Community Health Sciences & O’Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Tolulope T. Sajobi & Shelagh B. Coutts

  4. Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Foothills Medical Center, Room 1A10 Health Research Innovation Center, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada

    Sana Tariq, Christopher D. d’Esterre, Eric E. Smith, Richard Stewart Longman, Richard Frayne, Shelagh B. Coutts, Nils D. Forkert & Philip A. Barber

  5. Department of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Richard Frayne & Nils D. Forkert

Authors
  1. Sana Tariq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher D. d’Esterre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tolulope T. Sajobi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eric E. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard Stewart Longman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Richard Frayne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shelagh B. Coutts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nils D. Forkert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Philip A. Barber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TTS, EES, RSL, RF, SBC, NDF, PAB have made substantial contributions to conception and design of this study. ST and PAB wrote the draft of the manuscript and all authors were involved in revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. ST was involved in coordinating the study, recruitment, and administering neuropsychological tests. TTS provided significant statistical guidance for the project. RSL conceptualized the neuropsychological test battery and oversaw research assistant (RA) training for administration. RF and NDF provided guidance related to imaging modalities and the conceptual framework for analysis. All authors have given full approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip A. Barber.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has been approved by the Conjoint Health and Research Ethics Board (CHREB; 13–0240). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tariq, S., d’Esterre, C.D., Sajobi, T.T. et al. A longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of neurodegenerative and small vessel disease, and clinical cognitive trajectories in non demented patients with transient ischemic attack: the PREVENT study. BMC Geriatr 18, 163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0858-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Neurodegeneration
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Vascular dementia
  • Small vessel disease
  • Cognition
  • Aging

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us