Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between oral health and locomotive syndrome: a cross-sectional study in Japanese adults

BMC Geriatrics volume 23, Article number: 846 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Many studies have examined the association between oral health, care needs, and physical function, but few have focused on the association between oral health and locomotive syndrome (LS). We examined the association between LS and oral-health status, such as the number of teeth and chewing function, in an adult population.

Methods

The study included 2888 participants who underwent examinations of motor function and oral health. Individuals with LS stage 1 or higher were classified as having LS, while others were classified as not having it. Logistic regression analysis was performed using the presence or absence of LS as the dependent variable and age, sex, smoking status, drinking habit, exercise habit, walking speed, history of stroke, bone density, body mass index, metabolic syndrome, chewing function, and the number of teeth as independent variables to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each independent variable.

Results

When the number of teeth and chewing function were included separately in multivariate analyses, the OR for LS was significantly higher for participants with 0–19 teeth than for those with 28 teeth, and for participants with poor chewing function than for those with good function (adjusted ORs, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.01–2.15] and 1.73 [95% CI, 1.37–2.18], respectively). In analyses that included tooth number and chewing function as a combined independent variable, relative to individuals with 28 teeth and good masticatory function, the adjusted ORs were 2.67 (95% CI, 1.57–4.52) for those with 28 teeth and poor chewing function, 1.63 (95% CI, 1.20–2.22) for those with 20–27 teeth and poor chewing function, and 1.83 (95% CI, 1.06–3.18) for those with 0–19 teeth and poor chewing function.

Conclusion

Having fewer teeth and poor chewing function may be associated with LS. The maintenance of masticatory function may be important to prevent LS in adulthood.

Peer Review reports

Background

Decline in physiological reserves due to organ dysfunction leads to a state of frailty in older people that can lead to outcomes such as functional disability, need for nursing care, and death [1]. Locomotive syndrome (LS) is a condition in which mobility is impaired due to age-related muscle weakness and disorders of the locomotor system, such as bone, nerve, muscle, and joint diseases. It is estimated that 47 million people in Japan have LS, including those with preexisting conditions [2], and the number is likely to increase as the population ages.

Social participation and the activities of daily living can be limited by LS [3]. Thus, LS affects both physical- and mental-health status, such as through a lack of exercise and staying at home, and significantly reduces the quality of life of older individuals [4]. In addition, more than 20% of the need for long-term care in older people is due to motor-system disorders, such as joint diseases, fractures, and falls [5]. As LS is a risk factor for conditions requiring long-term care, its prevention is important from the perspective of avoiding the need for long-term care. Notably, muscle weakness tends to start in middle age and progress with age [6]; thus, the risk for LS should be considered not only in the older people but also in the middle-aged adult population.

Loss of teeth and chewing dysfunction are associated with reduced mobility and risk for functional disability [7,8,9]. In a cohort study of older people aged ≥60 years, those with tooth loss at baseline were slower walkers compared to those without tooth loss [7]. In a study of older people in the UK, as the number of remaining natural teeth increased, the probability of the instrumental activities of daily life being limited decreased [8]. In addition, individuals with reduced chewing function may have less independence [9]. The loss of many teeth and poor chewing function are associated with an unbalanced diet and malnutrition [10], which negatively affect physical function [11]. Thus, while many studies have assessed the relationship between oral health, care needs, and physical functioning, few have investigated the association between oral-health status and LS.

We examined the association between LS and oral-health status, such as the number of teeth and chewing function, in an adult population.

Methods

Participants

In total, 12,922 individuals had oral examinations as part of general checkups performed at the Aichi Health Promotion Foundation between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2019. Of these, motor function was also examined in 5230 individuals. Participants in this study were aged ≥50 years. In total, 2888 individuals with no missing data were included. The mean age of the participants was 60.15 (standard deviation, 7.69; range, 50–94) years.

Oral health examination

An oral-health examination was conducted to evaluate the condition of the teeth, recorded as sound, decayed, filled, or missing. The total number of teeth (excluding third molars) was used as the number of teeth. Residual tooth roots and root caps were considered decayed and filled teeth, respectively, and were included in the number of teeth.

Systemic health examination

Each participant’s height and weight were measured, and their body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and blood lipids (triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) were also measured, and metabolic syndrome was assessed from these results based on the Japanese criteria [12]. Individuals who met one item, in addition to having a large waist circumference, were classified as having pre-metabolic syndrome, and those who met two or more items other than a large waist circumference were classified as having metabolic syndrome. Individuals under treatment for, or taking medication related to, the components of metabolic syndrome were considered positive for the respective components.

Determination of locomotive syndrome

The criteria proposed by the Japanese Orthopedic Association were used to determine LS [13]. Judgments were made based on the results of the stand-up test, the two-step test, and the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25). The stand-up test involves participants sitting on a 40-, 30-, 20-, or 10-cm platform and determining whether they are able to stand up using both legs or one leg. If a person is unable to stand up from a 30-cm platform using both legs, the degree of LS is stage 3; if a person cannot stand up from a 20-cm platform using both legs but can stand up from a 30-cm platform, the degree of LS is stage 2; if a person cannot stand up from a 40-cm platform using one leg but can stand up from a 20-cm platform using both legs, the degree of LS is stage 1. In the two-step test, the individual walks two steps with the thighs as far apart as possible, and the value obtained by dividing their stride length by their height is the two-step value. Stage 3 LS is defined as two-step values < 0.9, stage 2 by values of 0.9 to < 1.1, and stage 1 by values of 1.1 to < 1.3. The GLFS-25 consists of 25 questions about physical and living conditions. It is rated on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more advanced LS. A score ≥ 24 indicates LS stage 3, a score of 16–23 indicates LS stage 2, and a score of 7–15 indicates LS stage 1. Of the LS stages based on the results of each test, the highest stage was used as the individual’s LS stage.

Questionnaire

A self-administered questionnaire was used to investigate smoking status (never/past/current), drinking habit (no/sometimes/everyday), exercise habit, walking speed, chewing function, and history of stroke. Participants were asked “Have you engaged in light, sweaty exercise for at least 30 min at a time, at least twice per week, for at least 1 year?” The respondents were asked about their walking speed. “Do you walk faster than your peers of approximately the same age?” Regarding chewing function, “Which of the following applies to your condition when you chew your food?” and they answered from three options: “I can chew and eat anything,” “I have some concerns about my teeth, gums, and bite, and sometimes have difficulty chewing,” and “I can hardly chew.”

Statistical analysis

Most participants in this study retained more than 20 teeth. Therefore, numbers of teeth were categorized as 0–19, 20–27, and 28 [14]. For chewing function, those who responded “I can chew and eat anything” were defined as the “good” group, and those who responded “I have some concerns about my teeth, gums, and bite, and sometimes have difficulty chewing” or “I can hardly chew” were defined as the “poor” group. Individuals with LS stage 1 or higher were classified as patients with LS, while others were classified as patients without LS.

The chi-square test was used to examine differences in the proportions of categorical variables and the unpaired t-test was used to examine differences in the mean values of continuous variables according to the presence or absence of LS. Logistic regression analysis was performed using the presence or absence of LS as the dependent variable and age, sex, smoking status, drinking habit, exercise habit, walking speed, history of stroke, bone mineral density, BMI, metabolic syndrome, chewing function, and number of teeth as independent variables to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each independent variable. The associations between the number of teeth and chewing function and LS were also examined, as one study found a strong association between the number of teeth and chewing function [15]. Therefore, we checked for multicollinearity among these variables using the variance inflation factor (VIF). All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS ver. 26.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The characteristics of participants according to LS status are shown in Table 1. Of the participants, 856 (29.6%) had LS. Significant differences in age, BMI, bone mineral density, sex, drinking habit, exercise habit, walking speed, metabolic syndrome, chewing function, and number of teeth were observed between participants with and without LS.

Table 1 Associations between the characteristics of the participants and locomotive syndrome
Full size table

Table 2 shows the results of logistic regression analysis in which the presence or absence of LS was used as the dependent variable and the number of teeth and chewing function were simultaneously or separately entered as independent variables. The VIF for tooth number and chewing function for locomotion was 1.05, a low value indicating that multicollinearity was not a problem.

Table 2 Logistic regression analysis of the associations between the independent variables and locomotive syndrome
Full size table

In multivariate analysis of these factors together, age, BMI, sex, drinking habit, exercise habit, walking speed, and chewing function were significantly associated with LS. Participants with chewing difficulties had a significantly higher OR for LS compared to those with good chewing function (adjusted OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.33–2.14]). No significant association was detected between the number of teeth and LS. In analyses considering each of these factors separately, each was significantly associated with LS. The OR for LS was significantly higher in participants with 0–19 teeth than in those with 28 teeth (adjusted OR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.01–2.15]). Participants with poor chewing function had a significantly higher OR for LS than those with good chewing function [adjusted OR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.37–2.18]).

Table 3 shows the results of the analysis including the number of teeth and chewing function as a combined independent variable. Relative to individuals with 28 teeth and good masticatory function, the adjusted OR for those with 28 teeth and poor chewing function was 2.67 (95% CI, 1.57–4.52); for those with 20–27 teeth and poor chewing function, 1.63 (95% CI, 1.20–2.22); and for those with 0–19 teeth and poor chewing function, 1.83 (95% CI, 1.06–3.18).

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of the association between the combined variables of the number of teeth and chewing function and locomotive syndrome
Full size table

Discussion

In this analysis of the association between oral-health status and LS in an adult population, having fewer teeth and poor chewing function were significantly associated with LS. However, in analyses that considered these factors simultaneously, only the association with chewing function remained, indicating that LS is more closely related with chewing function than with number of teeth.

Tooth loss is a risk factor for reduced mobility, such as walking speed and stair climbing [16, 17]. The loss of many teeth also increases the need for long-term care [18]. Older people with poor self-evaluated chewing function show lower activity and less ability to engage in daily living activities [9]. Tooth loss and the accompanying decline in chewing function present the risk of malnutrition [19]. Malnutrition in older people can lead to frailty, sarcopenia, and mortality. In this study, individuals with many missing teeth or poor chewing function had worse nutritional status, which may have led to LS. In addition, tooth loss is associated with locomotor diseases that cause LS, including osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis [20,21,22], which may increase the risk for LS onset. Therefore, those with fewer teeth may be at higher risk for LS.

In this study, analyses that included both tooth number and chewing function simultaneously as independent variables showed that LS was significantly associated only with the latter. In analyses that combined these factors, the risk for LS was significantly higher among those with 28 teeth but with reduced chewing function, implying that chewing function has a stronger effect on LS than does number of teeth. As chewing function is closely related to number of teeth, its restoration in individuals with many lost teeth through prosthetic treatment may be important to prevent LS. On the other hand, people with many teeth but poor chewing function were at greater risk for LS. However, chewing function has been reported to be influenced not only by the number of teeth and periodontal condition but also by the masticatory muscles [23]. The subjects in our study who reported not being able to chew well despite having a full set of teeth were more likely to have decreased masticatory muscle strength than were those with few teeth and difficulty in chewing. A significant correlation has been found between masseter muscle thickness and the skeletal muscle index [24], and people with weak masseter muscles may also have weak skeletal muscles throughout the body. Some reports have suggested a link between sarcopenia and decreased masticatory function [25, 26]. Sarcopenia is a condition of decreased skeletal-muscle mass and muscle weakness throughout the body and is a cause of LS. Thus, those with 28 teeth and poor chewing function would have the highest OR for LS. Training to recover masticatory function is important in this population.

Clenching the teeth affects postural stability. Afferent impulses induced by clenching promote the H reflex in the soleus and tibialis anterior muscles, the antigravity muscles of the lower limbs. This occurs via sensory receptors in the periodontal ligament and muscle spindles of the masticatory muscles to the cerebral cortex [27], thereby contributing to postural stability. When in an upright position, frequent small oscillations are generated in the body to maintain balance. A stable jaw position stabilizes the contraction of the sternocleidomastoid and reduces general body sway [28]. Therefore, decreased support from teeth and occlusion leads to deterioration in leg strength and balance. In a cross-sectional study of older Japanese, participants with more occlusal support had higher dynamic strength in their lower extremities and longer open-eyed one-leg standing times than those who did not [29]. Loss of teeth and less occlusal support may decrease muscle strength and balance in the lower extremities, leading to LS. If dental treatment can restore the occlusal state and prevent LS, it may reduce the risk for frailty and the need for long-term care, leading to an extended life expectancy.

Several limitations of this study should be discussed. Because we used a cross-sectional design, a causal relationship between number of teeth and chewing function and LS cannot be claimed. Chewing function was based on self-reports and may have differed from objective chewing function [30]. Psychological factors such as depression have also been associated with subjective assessment of chewing function [31, 32]. In addition, a relationship between depression and LS has been reported, but we did not consider such factors in this study [33]. Our results may not be generalizable because the participants were limited to a specific area of Japan.

In conclusion, people with fewer teeth and poor chewing function are at significantly greater risk for LS. Prevention of tooth loss through appropriate self-care and professional care, evaluation of oral function, and training to prevent deterioration of oral function help to prevent LS in old age.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Aichi Health Promotion Foundation, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the Aichi Health Promotion Foundation.

Abbreviations

LS:

locomotive syndrome

BMI:

body mass index

OR:

odds ratio

CI:

confidence interval

References

  1. Proietti M, Cesari M. Frailty: what is it? Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1216:1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Mabuchi A, En-Yo Y, Yoshida M, et al. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, lumbar spondylosis, and osteoporosis in Japanese men and women: the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study. J Bone Miner Metab. 2009;27:620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ono R, Murata S, Uchida K, Endo T, Otani K. Reciprocal relationship between locomotive syndrome and social frailty in older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021;21:981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Imagama S, Ando K, Kobayashi K, Machino M, Tanaka S, Morozumi M, et al. Differences of locomotive syndrome and frailty in community-dwelling middle-aged and elderly people: pain, osteoarthritis, spinal alignment, body balance, and quality of life. Mod Rheumatol. 2020;30:921.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions. 2019. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa19/index.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2022.

  6. Dodds RM, Granic A, Robinson SM, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia, long-term conditions, and multimorbidity: findings from UK biobank participants. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11:62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Welmer AK, Rizzuto D, Parker MG, Xu W. Impact of tooth loss on walking speed decline over time in older adults: a population-based cohort study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017;29:793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsuyama Y, Listl S, Jürges H, Watt RG, Aida J, Tsakos G. Causal effect of tooth loss on functional capacity in older adults in England: a natural experiment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69:1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Laudisio A, Marzetti E, Pagano F, Bernabei R, Zuccalà G. Masticatory dysfunction is associated with worse functional ability: a population-based study. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37:113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zelig R, Goldstein S, Touger-Decker R, Firestone E, Golden A, Johnson Z, et al. Tooth loss and nutritional status in older adults: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2022;7:4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cederholm T, Nouvenne A, Ticinesi A, Maggio M, Lauretani F, Ceda GP, et al. The role of malnutrition in older persons with mobility limitations. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20:3173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsuzawa Y. Metabolic syndrome--definition and diagnostic criteria in Japan. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2005;12:301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakamura K, Ogata T. Locomotive syndrome: definition and management. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab. 2016;14:56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu Y, Hollis JH. Tooth loss and its association with dietary intake and diet quality in American adults. J Dent. 2014;42:1428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbert GH, Meng X, Duncan RP, Shelton BJ. Incidence of tooth loss and prosthodontic dental care: effect on chewing difficulty onset, a component of oral health-related quality of life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Inui A, Takahashi I, Sawada K, Naoki A, Oyama T, Tamura Y, et al. Teeth and physical fitness in a community-dwelling 40 to 79-year-old Japanese population. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:873.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Holm-Pedersen P, Schultz-Larsen K, Christiansen N, Avlund K. Tooth loss and subsequent disability and mortality in old age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Komiyama T, Ohi T, Miyoshi Y, Murakami T, Tsuboi A, Tomata Y, et al. Association between tooth loss, receipt of dental care, and functional disability in an elderly Japanese population: the Tsurugaya project. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64:2495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Okamoto N, Amano N, Nakamura T, Yanagi M. Relationship between tooth loss, low masticatory ability, and nutritional indices in the elderly: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ishibashi H. Locomotive syndrome in Japan. Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2018;4:86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hashimoto H, Hashimoto S, Shimazaki Y. Relationship between tooth loss and the medications used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Med. 2021;10:876.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Darcey J, Horner K, Walsh T, Southern H, Marjanovic EJ, Devlin H. Tooth loss and osteoporosis: to assess the association between osteoporosis status and tooth number. Br Dent J. 2013;214:E10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bakke M, Tuxen A, Vilmann P, Jensen BR, Vilmann A, Toft M. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res. 1992;100:164.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Umeki K, Watanabe Y, Hirano H, Edahiro A, Ohara Y, Yoshida H, et al. The relationship between masseter muscle thickness and appendicular skeletal muscle mass in Japanese community-dwelling elders: a cross-sectional study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;78:18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hatta K, Ikebe K. Association between oral health and sarcopenia: a literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2021;65:131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Murakami M, Hirano H, Watanabe Y, Sakai K, Kim H, Katakura A. Relationship between chewing ability and sarcopenia in Japanese community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15:1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Takada Y, Miyahara T, Tanaka T, Ohyama T, Nakamura Y. Modulation of H reflex of pretibial muscles and reciprocal Ia inhibition of soleus muscle during voluntary teeth clenching in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83:2063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Okuyama N, Yamaga T, Yoshihara A, Nohno K, Yoshitake Y, Kimura Y, et al. Influence of dental occlusion on physical fitness decline in a healthy Japanese elderly population. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;52:172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yamaga T, Yoshihara A, Ando Y, Yoshitake Y, Kimura Y, Shimada M, et al. Relationship between dental occlusion and physical fitness in an elderly population. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:M616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cusson V, Caron C, Gaudreau P, Morais JA, Shatenstein B, Payette H. Assessing older Adults’ masticatory efficiency. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63:1192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takagi D, Watanabe Y, Edahiro A, Ohara Y, Murakami M, Murakami K, et al. Factors affecting masticatory function of community-dwelling older people: investigation of the differences in the relevant factors for subjective and objective assessment. Gerodontology. 2017;34:357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Murakami M, Watanabe Y, Edahiro A, Ohara Y, Obuchi S, Kawai H, et al. Factors related to dissociation between objective and subjective masticatory function in Japanese community-dwelling elderly adults. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nakamura M, Hashizume H, Nomura S, Kono R, Utsunomiya H. The relationship between locomotive syndrome and depression in community-dwelling elderly people. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2017;2017:4104802.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the study participants and those involved in administering the health examinations.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19 K10429 and 22 K10353 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Preventive Dentistry and Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University, 1-100 Kusumoto-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8650, Japan

    Mizuki Saito & Yoshihiro Shimazaki

  2. Aichi Health Promotion Foundation, Nagoya, Japan

    Saori Yoshii & Hideo Takeyama

Authors
  1. Mizuki Saito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoshihiro Shimazaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saori Yoshii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hideo Takeyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MS contributed to conception, design, analysis, interpretation, and draft and critically revised the manuscript. YS contributed to conception, design, interpretation, and draft and critically revised the manuscript. SY contributed to conception, design, data acquisition, and critically revised the manuscript. HT contributed to conception, design, data acquisition, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors gave their final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshihiro Shimazaki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained to use the health examination data for research from all the participants. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The Institutional Review Board of Aichi Gakuin University School of Dentistry approved the study design, the data-collection methods, and the procedure for obtaining informed consent (approval number 618).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saito, M., Shimazaki, Y., Yoshii, S. et al. Association between oral health and locomotive syndrome: a cross-sectional study in Japanese adults. BMC Geriatr 23, 846 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04572-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04572-z

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us