Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of the association between the combined variables of the number of teeth and chewing function and locomotive syndrome
From: Association between oral health and locomotive syndrome: a cross-sectional study in Japanese adults
Independent variable | N (%) | Dependent variable: locomotive syndrome (absence = 0, presence = 1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude OR (95% CI) | P value | Adjusted ORa (95% CI) | P-value | ||
Number of teeth / Chewing function | |||||
28 teeth / Good | 980 (33.9) | 1 | 1 | ||
20–27 teeth / Good | 1408 (48.8) | 1.37 (1.14–1.65) | 0.001 | 1.04 (0.85–1.28) | 0.691 |
0–19 teeth / Good | 97 (3.4) | 2.85 (1.87–4.37) | < 0.001 | 1.46 (0.92–2.33) | 0.110 |
28 teeth / Poor | 68 (2.4) | 2.93 (1.78–4.83) | < 0.001 | 2.67 (1.57–4.52) | < 0.001 |
20–27 teeth / Poor | 267 (9.2) | 2.10 (1.58–2.80) | < 0.001 | 1.63 (1.20–2.22) | 0.002 |
0–19 teeth / Poor | 68 (2.4) | 3.30 (2.01–5.43) | < 0.001 | 1.83 (1.06–3.18) | 0.031 |