Skip to main content
Download PDF

Potentially inappropriate medications among older patients with Parkinson’s disease: a cross-sectional analysis of a national health insurance database in China

BMC Geriatrics volume 23, Article number: 827 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

With the rapid aging trend of China's population, the issue of drug rational use in older adults has become more and more prominent. Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the one of the most common age-related neurodegenerative disorders. Pharmaceutical treatment plays a cardinal role in alleviating motor and non-motor symptoms to improve the quality of life of patients with PD. Patients with PD have complex medical needs yet little is known about the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) among them in China. We quantify the prevalence of PIM use and identify its predictors among older persons with PD in China.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using a national representative database of all medical insurance beneficiaries across China, extracting records of ambulatory visits of older adults with PD between 2015 and 2017. Beneficiaries aged 65 and above were eligible for inclusion. The prevalence of patients exposed to overall PIMs and PIMs related to motor and cognitive impairment was calculated based on Beers Criteria 2015 version. Potential predictors of PIM concerning patients’ characteristics were estimated using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

A total of 14,452 older adults with PD were included. In total, 8,356 (57.8%) patients received at least one PIM; 2,464 (17.1%) patients received at least one motor-impairing PIM and 6,201 (42.9%) patients received at least one cognition-impairing PIM. The prevalence of overall PIM use was higher in patients of older age group (54.7% [65–74] vs. 59.5% [75–84; OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14–1.31] vs.65.5% [≥ 85; OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.38–1.80) and females (61.4% [female] vs. 55.0% [males; OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72–0.82).

Conclusions

Prescribing PIMs for older adults with PD was common in China, especially for females and older age groups, yet younger patients were more inclined to be prescribed with motor or cognition-impaired PIMs. Our findings represent a clear target awaiting multidimensional efforts to promote the rational prescribing of medications for this vulnerable population.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the one of the most common age-related neurodegenerative disorders [1, 2], the incidence of which sharply increases after 60 years of age [3]. While the progress of motor impairment can be taken under control with antiparkinsonian drugs, cognitive impairment, such as cognitive abnormalities, autonomic dysfunction, sleep disorders, and mood disorders, affecting 75% of PD patients who had a PD disease course of more than ten years, is deemed as one of the most distressing complications of PD for patients and their caregivers [4,5,6,7,8]. Alleviating cognitive symptoms using pharmaceutical treatment plays an extremely significant role to promote the quality of life of PD patients [7, 8]. However, prescribing medications for patients with PD needs extra deliberations as adverse drug-drug and drug-disease interactions can exacerbate PD symptoms and aggravate healthcare burden [9]. Hence, it is of great importance to evaluate the appropriateness of medication use among PD patients. The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers criteria list potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) that should be avoided or used with caution among older patients [10,11,12]. Previous studies observed that 35.8% of older patients with PD were exposed to PIMs in the US [13] and patients using PIMs had longer duration of hospital stay [14].

China has a rapidly ageing population [15] and 1.7% of older adults aged 65 years and above were diagnosed with PD [16]. It is estimated that the number of PD patients in China will reach 4.94 million by 2030, accounting for half of the global figure [17]. Though studies have evaluated PIM prescribing for the general older population in China [16, 17], older adults living with PD experience even heightened health risks due to their complex medical needs and higher susceptibility to PIM use. However, there is scarce literature investigating PIM use in this population in China and studies from abroad, mainly conducted in the United States, were unlikely to be generalizable to the Chinese context. Our study aimed to quantify the prevalence of PIM use and identify its risk factors among the older individuals with PD in China.

Methods

Study design

We conducted a cross-sectional study to explore the overall prevalence of PIM use and the prevalence of PIMs that might cause motor or cognitive impairments among older persons with PD across China, using a national representative dataset of claims data from 2015 to 2017.

Financial coverage of Chinese health insurance scheme

By the end of 2015, over 95% of the Chinese population were covered by one of the two basic medical insurance (BMI) schemes [18]. The Urban Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URRBMI) covers the urban non-employed and self-employed population and rural residents while the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI) covers the urban employees and the retired people [19]. The financial coverage of URRBMI and UEBMI are different. The UEBMI entails a lower deductible and higher reimbursement ratio and cap [20].

Data source and data collection

The China Health Insurance Association (CHIRA) collects all medical records of a national representative sample (sample ratio 2%) of all BMI beneficiaries across China every year, using a systematic random sampling strategy elaborated in previous studies [21,22,23,24,25]. We extracted all records of ambulatory visit of older beneficiaries (aged 65 years and above) between 2015 and 2017 from the CHIRA database, including information about the patient’s age, gender, type of insurance scheme, province of residence, visit date, diagnoses, and medications prescribed. All data were digitally transferred and verified.

Inclusion criteria

The CHIRA database coded diagnoses based on the World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision (ICD-10) [26] and drugs according to the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system [27]. We sorted PD diagnosis according to the ICD-10. Patients who had at least one record of ambulatory visit, a diagnosis of PD (ICD-10 code G20), and no record of atypical parkinsonism diagnosis (ICD-10 code G21) during the study period were eligible for inclusion regardless of whether they were prescribed with anti-Parkinson drugs (N04) or not during observation periods.

Outcome measures

We used the 2015 version of the AGS Beers criteria to evaluate the incidence of PIMs [10]. In this study, PIMs were defined as medications that: 1) are best avoided in most circumstances; 2) should be used with caution; 3) are best avoided in PD patients due to drug-PD interactions; and 4) are involved in drug-drug interactions listed in the Beers criteria. Some entries of the Beers criteria that were not measured are shown in Table S1. Medications with a strong tendency to worsen motor symptoms of PD, including antiparkinsonian agents to be avoided in most conditions and agents that should be avoided due to drug-PD interaction listed in the Beers criteria, were defined as motor-impairing PIMs (Table S2). Medications that would potentially exacerbate cognitive impairment experienced by PD patients, including agents to be avoided in most conditions and agents that should be avoided due to drug-dementia interaction listed in the Beers criteria, were defined as cognition-impairing PIMs (Table S3). Aripiprazole was deemed as a PIM due to the classification change from the 2015 to 2023 Beers criteria [11].

The primary outcome was the proportion of PD patients that were exposed to at least one PIM. Secondary outcomes were the proportions of PD patients that were exposed to motor-impairing PIMs or cognition-impairing PIMs. We also used the 2023 updated version of Beers Criteria in the sensitive analysis [11].

Statistical analysis

We conducted descriptive analyses to show patients’ characteristics and PIM use. We applied the generalized linear model with logit link function and binomial distribution to examine the adjusted associations between the use of PIMs and independent variables, including year and patients’ age, gender, type of insurance scheme, and region of residence. We classified 31 provinces in mainland China into three regions based on geographic distribution, economic, and other environmental factors (Table S4). The marginal standardization approach adjusted by generalized linear model with logit link function and binomial distribution was applied to calculate the mean adjusted rates of PIM, where they were summed to a weighted average that reflected the population distribution across regions in China. We conducted statistical analyses using Stata version 17. The level of statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05 (two-sided).

Results

Study sample and characteristics

Of the 2,545,430 older adults aged 65 years and above identified in the CHIRA database between 2015 and 2017, 14,452 (0.6%) were with a PD diagnosis, who filed 118,478 ambulatory prescriptions and had a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 76 (70–81) years. PD patients were mostly below 85 years of age, with 6,603 (45.7%) patients aging 65 to 74 years and 6,705 (46.4%) patients aging 75 to 84 years. Most of PD patients were male (8,037 [55.6%]), with UEBMI (12,215 [84.5%]), and residing in the eastern region of China (5,836 [43.5%], Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics and overall PIM use of older adults with Parkinson’s disease in China, 2015–2017 (n = 14,452)
Full size table

Overall PIM prescribing for older adults with PD

Among all older adults with PD, 8,356 (57.8%) had at least one prescription containing PIM during our study period. After adjustment, the prevalence of PIM use increased with age and was significantly higher in patients who were ≥ 85 years of age (65.5%; OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.38–1.80) and lower in males (55.0%; OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72–0.82). The odds of receiving a prescription containing a PIM was significantly lower for patients with UEBMI (56.1%; OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.56–0.68) and residing in the western region (53.2%; OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70–0.82, Table 1). The overall PIM rate was 63.4% based on the 2023 Beers Criteria, which is slightly higher than that observed using the 2015 version; yet the influencing factors were relatively stable. ( Table S5).

Motor-impairing PIMs for older adults with PD

Among all the older persons with PD, 2,464 (17.1%) patients received at least one PIM that could worsen PD motor symptoms. Patients’ age, gender, insurance type, and region of residence were significantly associated with the possibility of receiving motor-impairing PIMs. Contrary to the overall prevalence of PIM use, patients who aged 65–74 years were at higher odds of receiving motor-impairing PIMs (19.4%, reference group), compared with patients who aged 75–84 (14.6%, OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64–0.78) or > 84 (17.7%; OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76–1.06) years (Table 2). The associations other than age group were in the same direction as for overall PIM use.

Table 2 Factors associated with receipt of any motor-impairing PIMs among older adults with Parkinson’s disease in China, 2015–2017 (n = 14,452)
Full size table

Cognition-impairing PIMs for older adults with PD

Among all older adults with PD, 6,201 (42.9%) had at least one prescription containing PIMs that could exacerbate cognitive impairment. Similarly, PD patients who were 65–74 years of age had a higher odds of receiving PIMs (44.8%, reference group), compared with patients who aged 75–84 (41.3%, OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81–0.93) or > 84 (41.6%; OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77–1.00) years. Patients who were male (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62–0.71), covered by UEBMI (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.56–0.67), and residing in the western region (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79–0.93) were significantly associated with decreased odds of receiving cognition-impairing PIMs (Table 3). The rate of older PD persons being exposed to cognition-impairing PIMs, as evaluated by the 2023 Beers Criteria, was slightly lower than that observed when using the 2015 version (39.1% vs. 42.9%), which could be contributed to the removal of H2-receptor antagonists as cognitive-impairing PIMs, an update in the 2023 Beers Criteria.

Table 3 Factors associated with receipt of any cognition-impairing PIMs among older adults with Parkinson’s disease in China, 2015–2017 (n = 14,452)
Full size table

Distribution of PIMs by medications

Of all sampled patients, 4,826 (33.4%) patients were exposed to PIMs encompassing medications for the central nervous system, followed by anticholinergics (3,396 [23.5%]). Moreover, most medications for the nervous system and anticholinergics were also identified as motor- or cognition-impairing PIMs for PD patients. We list PIMs whose prevalence was over 0.5% in Table 4. Flupentixol/melitracen combination (794 [5.5%]) was the most prevalent PIM that may exacerbate motor symptoms in PD patients, followed by olanzapine (543 [3.8%]) and risperidone (539 [3.7%]), both of which are atypical antipsychotics commonly prescribed for patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). Trihexyphenidyl (2,386 [16.5%]) was identified as the most prevalent PIMs associated with cognition- impairing drug-PD interactions, followed by estazolam (1,126 [7.8%]) and alprazolam (888 [6.1%], Table 4).

Table 4 Most common PIMs among older adults with Parkinson’s disease in China, 2015–2017
Full size table

Discussion

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of PIM use among older PD patients in China between 2015 and 2017 based on a national representative insurance database. We observed that 57.8% of older adults with PD were exposed to at least one PIM, among which 17.1% and 42.9% were exposed to PIMs that could exacerbate their motor and cognitive impairments. Medications for the central nervous system and anticholinergics were most commonly used PIMs for older PD patients. Increasing age, female sex, being insured by URRBMI, and residing in the eastern or central regions were positively associated with the prevalence of PIM use.

The prevalence of PIM use among older PD patients was 57.8% in our study, which was much higher than that in the US (35.8%) [13], suggesting higher risks entailed in the pharmaceutical treatment for older PD patients in China. The prevalence of PIM use also differed between PD patients and the general population in China, with the latter being 29% as reported by a previous meta-analysis [28]. A total of 17.1% of sample patients had at least one PIM prescription that could aggravate their PD-related motor symptoms, which is double the estimate seen in a previous study in the US (8.7%) [13]. Our findings also revealed that 42.9% of older PD patients were exposed to at least one prescription containing PIMs that could exacerbate their cognitive impairment, also much higher than that in the US (29.0%) [13]. The potential cause of these discrepancies might be that pharmaceutical treatments for common cognitive symptoms of PD (e.g., antipsychotics for psychosis and benzodiazepines for insomnia) usually are PIMs that entail high risks of motor and/or cognitive impairment.

Most of the motor-impairing PIMs identified in our study are antipsychotic agents [29], which might also impair patients’ cognition. This is in line with the high prevalence of psychosis, with up to 60% of PD patients suffering from it [30]. Quetiapine and clozapine were the only two antipsychotics recommended for PDP by the AGS Beers criteria [12]. However, the most commonly used atypical antipsychotics in PD patients were olanzapine and risperidone in our study. As a previous study showed that olanzapine and risperidone were the top two consumed antipsychotics in China [31], this may indicate that clinicians did not differentiate between treatments of psychosis in the general population and PD patients. Besides, trihexyphenidyl, an anticholinergic anti-PD drug, was also a commonly used PIM, though it should be avoided in patients aged 60 and above for its possible cognitive impairment, as suggested by both the AGS Beers criteria and the Chinese guidelines for PD management [9, 32, 33]. Nevertheless, 16.5% of older adults with PD used trihexyphenidyl in our study, which was even higher than that among patients aged under 50 and with young-onset PD in China (14%) [34].

Our study also revealed that female PD patients were at greater risks of receiving PIMs than males, which was consistent with previous studies conducted in PD patients and in the general population [35, 36]. Epidemiological evidence indicated that affective disorders were more prevalent as comorbidities in female PD patients [37]. Therefore, antidepressants and benzodiazepines (BZDs) were more commonly used among females [38], which might partially explain the greater odds of receiving motor- and cognition-impairing PIMs of females. Besides, pharmaceutical treatment for older adults should be more cautious as aging is inextricably linked to the alterations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, which may exacerbate drug-related problems [39, 40]. In this study, the overall prevalence of PIM use increased with age, however, the prevalence of motor- and cognition-impairing PIMs showed an inverse association with age. This may indicate that clinicians took more caution when prescribing medications likely to cause motor or cognitive impairments for older persons with PD.

Our results imply that medications’ potential harms or contra-indications for older adults with PD could to some extent be easily overlooked. Efforts shall be made to assess the appropriateness of medications prescribed for this already vulnerable population. For example, educational programs can keep clinicians updated about PIMs and competent in deciding the most appropriate mediations for older adults with PD. In other hand, prescribers are often well intentioned in their treatment but sometimes patients have symptoms that require treatment even if it comes with some degree of risks. For example, patients with behavioral issues that risk self-harm may require antipsychotics even if it will blunt the effects of their PD therapy. Pharmacists should be proactively involved in assessing medications prescribed as pharmaceutical therapy plays a cardinal role in PD treatment. Moreover, an expert guidance or consensus on medications to protect cognitive function of PD patients can also help clinicians better prescribe medications, which would in turn alleviate the burden of disease and health care expenditures [41,42,43]. For example, quetiapine and clozapine, which have priority over other antipsychotics for patients with PD, could be recommended as the first choice for controlling their psychosis symptoms.

To our best knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the prevalence and risk factors of PIM use among older adults with PD in China using a nationally representative health insurance database. The present study focused not only on the prevalence of general PIMs that pose potential risks for all older individuals but also on PD disease-specific PIMs. It’s worth noting that PIMs posing motor-impairment and cognition-impairment risks contributed greatly to the overall PIM use among older PD patients, which is in urgent need for clinical intervention. Several limitations of this study should be noted. First, due to the lack of information about the patients’ creatinine clearance, drug doses, and duration in our database, we excluded some PIMs listed in the 2015 AGS Beers criteria (Table S1). Therefore, the overall prevalence of PIM use may be underestimated. Second, owing to the limitations of the database, many factors that might have affected clinicians’ prescribing and drug choice, such as patients’ medical history, cognitive status, economic status, and long-term treatment patterns were not measured. Therefore, we were unable to identify an exhaustive list of predictors of PIM use or and clarify their mechanisms of action. Third, we did not include Traditional Chinese Medicines (TCMs) in our study because the Beers criteria did not contain recommendations for TCMs.

Conclusion

More than half of older adults with PD in China received at least one PIM, especially for central nervous system medications and anticholinergics that pose particularly high risk. Females at advanced age were at a particularly high risk to the exposure of PIMs. More studies are needed to understand the rationale for, clinical impact of, and alternatives to PIMs commonly used in older adults with PD.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from China Health Insurance Association but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the corresponding author (Xiaodong Guan) upon reasonable request and with permission of China Health Insurance Association.

References

  1. Nussbaum RL, Ellis CE. Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(14):1356–64. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM2003ra020003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee A, Gilbert RM. Epidemiology of Parkinson Disease. Neurol Clin. 2016;34(4):955–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2016.06.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lees AJ, Hardy J, Revesz T. Parkinson’s Disease. Lancet. 2009;373(9680):2055–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60492-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pfeiffer RF. Non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;22(Suppl 1):S119-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.09.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim H-S, Cheon S-M, Seo J-W, Ryu H-J, Park K-W, Kim JW. Nonmotor symptoms more closely related to Parkinson’s Disease: comparison with normal elderly. J Neurol Sci. 2013;324(1–2):70–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2012.10.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krishnan S, Sarma G, Sarma S, Kishore A. Do nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease differ from normal aging? Mov Disord. 2011;26(11):2110–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Prevalence and characteristics of dementia in Parkinson disease: an 8-year prospective study - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12633150/. (accessed 2022–12–29).

  8. The Sydney multicenter study of Parkinson’s disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18307261/. (accessed 2022–12–29).

  9. Lindblad CI, Hanlon JT, Gross CR, Sloane RJ, Pieper CF, Hajjar ER, Ruby CM, Schmader KE. Clinically important drug-disease interactions and their prevalence in older adults. Clin Ther. 2006;28(8):1133–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.08.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. By the American Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(11):2227–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. By the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2023 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc  2023;71(7):2052–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. By the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(4):674–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abraham DS, Pham Nguyen TP, Hennessy S, Weintraub D, Gray SL, Xie D, Willis AW. Frequency of and risk factors for potentially inappropriate medication use in Parkinson’s Disease. Age Ageing. 2020;49(5):786–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cox N, Louie JM, Sederholm BH. Inappropriate medication use in hospitalized patients diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease. Pharmacy (Basel). 2018;6(3):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6030100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zeng Y. Towards deeper research and better policy for healthy aging –using the unique data of chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey. China Economic J. 2012;5(2–3):131–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2013.764677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Z-X, Roman GC, Hong Z, Wu C-B, Qu Q-M, Huang J-B, Zhou B, Geng Z-P, Wu J-X, Wen H-B, Zhao H, Zahner GEP. Parkinson’s Disease in China: prevalence in Beijing, Xian, and Shanghai. Lancet. 2005;365(9459):595–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17909-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dorsey ER, Constantinescu R, Thompson JP, Biglan KM, Holloway RG, Kieburtz K, Marshall FJ, Ravina BM, Schifitto G, Siderowf A, Tanner CM. Projected number of people with Parkinson Disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030. Neurology. 2007;68(5):384–6. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000247740.47667.03.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fang H, Eggleston K, Hanson K, Wu M. Enhancing financial protection under China’s social health insurance to achieve universal health coverage. BMJ. 2019;365:l2378. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2378.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. The Right to Development: China’s Philosophy, Practice and Contribution (Full Text). http://www.scio.gov.cn/ztk/dtzt/34102/35549/35553/Document/1534025/1534025.htm. (accessed 2023–11–21).

  20. Center for Health Statistics and Information, National Health and Family Planning Commission. An analysis report of national health services survey in China, 2013.China Union Medical University Press, 2015. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/mohwsbwstjxxzx/s8211/201610/9f109ff40e9346fca76dd82cecf419ce.shtml. (accessed 2023–11–21).

  21. Medication Use During Pregnancy in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a National Health Insurance Database - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31849536/. (accessed 2022–12–29).

  22. Health Care Utilization and Costs of Patients With Prostate Cancer in China Based on National Health Insurance Database From 2015 to 2017 - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32587512/. (accessed 2022–12–29).

  23. Xia L, Li JH, Zhao K, Wu HY. Incidence and in-hospital mortality of acute aortic dissection in China: Analysis of China Health Insurance Research (CHIRA) Data 2011. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015;12(5):502–6. https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.05.021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Patterns of antiemetic prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in China - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27199514/. (accessed 2022–12–29).

  25. Huang J, Yin H, Zhang M, Ni Q, Xuan J. Understanding the economic burden of heart failure in China: impact on disease management and resource utilization. J Med Econ. 2017;20(5):549–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2017.1297309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. ICD-10 Version:2019. https://icd.who.int/browse10/2019/en. (accessed 2023–03–24).

  27. WHOCC - ATC/DDD Index. https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/. (accessed 2023–03–24).

  28. Tian F, Chen Z, Wu J. Prevalence of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications use in elderly chinese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:862561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.862561.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Antipsychotic use in older adults with Parkinson’s disease - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17149718/. (accessed 2022–12–29).

  30. Psychosis in Parkinson’s Disease: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27312429/. (accessed 2022–12–29).

  31. Zhang X, Hu X, Zhao Y, Lu CY, Nie X, Shi L. Trends in the utilization of psychotropic medications in China from 2018 to 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:967826. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.967826s.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Medication Therapy Management Service for Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: A Before-and-After Study - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27271736/. (accessed 2022–12–29).

  33. Chen S, Chan P, Sun S, Chen H, Zhang B, Le W, Liu C, Peng G, Tang B, Wang L, Cheng Y, Shao M, Liu Z, Wang Z, Chen X, Wang M, Wan X, Shang H, Liu Y, Xu P, Wang J, Feng T, Chen X, Hu X, Xie A, Xiao Q. The recommendations of Chinese Parkinson’s Disease and movement disorder society consensus on therapeutic management of Parkinson’s Disease. Transl Neurodegener. 2016;5:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-016-0059-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu X-Q, Wang X-Y, Shen H-M, Pang W-Y, Zhong M-K, Ma C-L. Real-world prescription patterns for patients with young-onset Parkinson’s Disease in China: a trend analysis from 2014 to 2019. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13: 858139. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.858139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Nam Y-S, Han JS, Kim JY, Bae WK, Lee K. Prescription of potentially inappropriate medication in Korean older adults based on 2012 beers criteria: a cross-sectional population based study. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0285-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Fu M, Wushouer H, Nie X, Shi L, Guan X, Ross-Degnan D. Potentially inappropriate medications among elderly patients in community healthcare institutions in Beijing. China Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29(8):923–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Martinez-Martin P, Falup Pecurariu C, Odin P, van Hilten JJ, Antonini A, Rojo-Abuin JM, Borges V, Trenkwalder C, Aarsland D, Brooks DJ, Ray Chaudhuri K. Gender-related differences in the burden of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease. J Neurol. 2012;259(8):1639–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6392-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Annual Prevalence of Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications for Treatment of Affective Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32553997/. (accessed 2022–12–29).

  39. Fried TR, O’Leary J, Towle V, Goldstein MK, Trentalange M, Martin DK. Health outcomes associated with polypharmacy in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(12):2261–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Payne RA. The epidemiology of polypharmacy. Clin Med (Lond). 2016;16(5):465–9. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.16-5-465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease: impact on quality of life, disability, and caregiver burden - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23172765/. (accessed 2022–12–29).

  42. Motor dual-tasking deficits predict falls in Parkinson’s disease: A prospective study - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26997654/ (accessed 2022–12–29).

  43. Safarpour D, Thibault DP, DeSanto CL, Boyd CM, Dorsey ER, Racette BA, Willis AW. Nursing home and end-of-life care in Parkinson Disease. Neurology. 2015;85(5):413–9. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001715.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our sincere appreciation to China Health Insurance Association for providing great support for data collection and deidentified of this study.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82273899). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the report, or decision to submit the article for publication. The corresponding author had access to all data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mengyuan Fu, Can Li and Zinan Zhao contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Mengyuan Fu, Can Li, Kexin Ling, Zhiwen Gong, Jianchun Li, Weihang Cao, Luwen Shi & Xiaodong Guan

  2. International Research Center for Medicinal Administration, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Mengyuan Fu, Huangqianyu Li, Luwen Shi & Xiaodong Guan

  3. Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital), Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Zinan Zhao, Ting Li, Jianchun Li, Weihang Cao, Xin Hu & Pengfei Jin

  4. National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Zinan Zhao, Ting Li, Jianchun Li, Weihang Cao, Xin Hu & Pengfei Jin

  5. Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Zinan Zhao, Ting Li, Jianchun Li, Weihang Cao, Xin Hu & Pengfei Jin

  6. Beijing Key Laboratory of Assessment of Clinical Drugs Risk and Individual Application, Beijing Hospital), Beijing, 100730, People’s Republic of China

    Zinan Zhao, Ting Li, Jianchun Li, Weihang Cao, Xin Hu & Pengfei Jin

Authors
  1. Mengyuan Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Can Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zinan Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kexin Ling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhiwen Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Huangqianyu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ting Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jianchun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Weihang Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xin Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Luwen Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Pengfei Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Xiaodong Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XG, PJ, and MF conceived and designed the work. CL, KL, JL and WC searched the literature. TL and XH collected the data. All authors acquired the data. MF, CL and ZG analyzed the data. XG, MF, CL and ZZ drafted the manuscript. XG, PJ and LS critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. HL polished the language of the manuscript. XG and PJ supervised the study and contributed equally to this research work. MF, CL and ZZ contributed equally to this research work and are joint first authors. All authors were responsible for the interpretation of the data, and revised, and gave final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Pengfei Jin or Xiaodong Guan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical approval was obtained from the Peking University Institution Review Board (IRB00001052-22002). Informed consent for all patients was waived by Peking University Institution Review Board.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

We declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1.Items of the Beers Criteria that excluded from study analyses. Table S2. Potentially inappropriate medications for PD patients due to motor impairment. Table S3.Potentially inappropriate medications for PD patients due to cognitive impairment. Table S4. Geographical division of China. Table S5.Overall PIM use of older patients with Parkinson’s disease in China, 2015-2017 using Beers criteria, 2023 version.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, M., Li, C., Zhao, Z. et al. Potentially inappropriate medications among older patients with Parkinson’s disease: a cross-sectional analysis of a national health insurance database in China. BMC Geriatr 23, 827 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04547-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04547-0

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us