Skip to main content
Download PDF

Cingulate white matter mediates the effects of fecal Ruminococcus on neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with amyloid-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment

BMC Geriatrics volume 23, Article number: 720 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Microbiota-gut-brain axis interacts with one another to regulate brain functions. However, whether the impacts of gut dysbiosis on limbic white matter (WM) tracts contribute to the neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in patients with amyloid-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI+), have not been explored yet. This study aimed to investigate the mediation effects of limbic WM integrity on the association between gut microbiota and NPS in patients with aMCI+.

Methods

Twenty patients with aMCI + and 20 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. All subjects underwent neuropsychological assessments and their microbial compositions were characterized using 16S rRNA Miseq sequencing technique. Amyloid deposition inspected by positron emission tomography imaging and limbic WM tracts (i.e., fornix, cingulum, and uncinate fasciculus) detected by diffusion tensor imaging were additionally measured in patients with aMCI+. We employed a regression-based mediation analysis using Hayes’s PROCESS macro in this study.

Results

The relative abundance of genera Ruminococcus and Lactococcus was significantly decreased in patients with aMCI + versus HCs. The relative abundance of Ruminococcus was negatively correlated with affective symptom cluster in the aMCI + group. Notably, this association was mediated by WM integrity of the left cingulate gyrus.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest Ruminococcus as a potential target for the management of affective impairments in patients with aMCI+.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), mainly characterized by episodic memory deficits, is a prodromal phase of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia [1]. The primary neuropathological hallmarks of AD are the deposition of β-amyloid plaques in the cerebral parenchyma, along with the presence of neurofibrillary tangles within neurons [2]. In recent years, the National Institute on Aging − Alzheimer’s Association has proposed a biomarker-based classification system, which categorizes the main AD biomarkers into three types, including amyloid (A), tau (T), and neurodegeneration (N) [3]. Notably, the category of amyloid-positivity (A+) accounts for most individuals with symptomatic AD.

In the stage of aMCI, cognitive impairments are often accompanied by the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), of which mood disturbances have been widely reported [4, 5]. Since NPS contribute to increased functional impairments and a greater burden on their caregivers, a better characterization of NPS in these patients is of particular importance [6]. To improve the disease management, Gauthier and colleagues have proposed that NPS clusters should be identified in clinical trials, which enables similar symptoms to be studied together, thereby strengthening results of exploring their pathogenesis and treatment [7]. Based on clinical observations, NPS can be categorized into three clusters: the psychotic cluster (i.e., hallucinations and delusions), the hyperactivity cluster (i.e., lability, disinhibition, agitation/aggression, and aberrant motor behavior), and the affective symptom cluster (i.e., apathy, depression, anxiety, and changes in sleep or appetite) [8].

Growing evidence demonstrates a complex bidirectional communication between central nervous system and gut microbiota, termed the microbiota-gut-brain (MGB) axis [9]. This reciprocal interaction is implicated in brain development and function mediated by different biochemical signaling pathways such as neurotransmitters and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis [10]. Dysfunction of the MGB axis has been found to be closely involved in the pathogenesis of NPS [11, 12]. It has been reported that the disruption of gut homeostasis influenced the release of monoamine neurotransmitters and stimulated inflammation in the brain through the systemic circulation, which in turn, impacted mood and behavior [13]. Likewise, gut dysbiosis-triggered HPA axis dysregulation led to reduced expression of brain-derived nerve growth factor and mental health problems including anxiety and depression [14]. Several bacterial strains have been found to be related to NPS in AD. For instance, genera Anaerobacterium and Taibaiella were negatively correlated with depression, whereas the association of anxiety with class Cytophagia and its order Cytophagales showed the opposite patterns [15]. Nonetheless, the mechanisms underlying these relationships are not be fully elucidated. Exploration of this issue may provide clinical insights by manifesting the MGB axis as potential targets for effective management of NPS.

The limbic system, a group of interconnected cortical and subcortical structures, plays critical roles in episodic memory and emotional processing [16]. Papez proposed the first unified limbic network model for linking action and perception to emotion [17]. A revised model proposed by Catani and colleagues offered a more comprehensive understanding of the limbic system [16]. Based on the Catani’s model, these tracts were impaired early in the patients with aMCI [18]. Since white matter (WM) loss commonly precedes gray matter atrophy, it is useful to apply diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to measure the WM changes in patients with aMCI [19]. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity (RD) are the widely used and representative diffusion metrics. Furthermore, tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) is a hypothesis-free approach that generates a WM skeleton to facilitate voxel-based analysis in WM pathways across individuals and groups [20]. Using the TBSS method, more severity of apathy was associated with lower FA values of multiple WM tracts in patients with aMCI [21]. Previous research has also shown that individuals with coexisting aMCI and late-life depression manifested widespread limbic degradation [22]. From the perspective of the MGB axis, the limbic system is chiefly involved in gut control. Existing evidence has revealed that the signaling from gut microbiota was transduced to the limbic system through the HPA axis and enteric nervous system. Additionally, NPS were found to be associated with the fluctuation of neurotransmitters because some gut microbial products acted as “neuro-nucleo-modulins” and thereby led to the host’s limbic degradation [23, 24]. Therefore, the limbic region of the mammalian brain is linked to both the internal and external homeostasis of the organism [25]. These findings suggest that the limbic structure is likely a convergence hub for the overlapping effects of gut dysbiosis and NPS.

Major advances in non-invasive neuroimaging techniques enable us to investigate the role of gut microbiota in brain function and behavior, which can foster the identification of potential mediators of this relationship. Specifically, Cai and colleagues showed that the interplay between alpha diversity and behaviors was mediated by functional connectivity of several brain regions in healthy young adults [26]. Recent evidence also demonstrated that a higher level of anxiety was linked to a smaller gray matter volume of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and reduced Chao1 in healthy subjects [27]. In individuals with obesity, there was a potential relationship among the relative abundance of phylum Actinobacteria, WM microstructure, and cognitive functions [28]. Persistent probiotic ingestion led to a decrease in activity of brain areas involved in emotional regulation when subjects were administered with negative facial expressions, indicating that alterations of the gut microbiota with probiotics had a measurable effect on the brain [29]. Nevertheless, it has not been investigated, so far, the impact of gut dysbiosis on brain WM integrity in patients with aMCI.

In this study, we compared gut microbial diversity and composition using 16S rRNA gene sequencing between patients with amyloid-positive aMCI (aMCI+) and their healthy counterparts. The limbic WM integrity was analyzed by high-resolution DTI data. In the aMCI + group, Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) was employed to assess their severities of NPS. We focused on NPS due to their close relationships with gut microbiota and the corresponding metabolites [30, 31]. We hypothesized that gut dysbiosis would be linked to limbic WM degeneration, which could mediate the association between the dysbiotic microbiota and NPS.

Materials and methods

Participants

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan (202001151B0). All participants were required to provide written informed consent before participating in this study. A total of 20 individuals with aMCI + and 20 healthy controls (HC) without cognitive problems, mostly patients’ spouses, were recruited from the Department of Neurology of Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Each subject underwent detailed clinical and neuropsychological assessments. Clinical diagnosis of aMCI was based on the Petersen’s criteria [32]. In addition, aMCI + patients were administered with blood sample tests, amyloid burden evaluation, and DTI scans. The Centiloid scale was applied to standardize quantitative amyloid measures by the neurologists independently and blind to patients’ clinical information (Supplementary methods) [33, 34]. We also provided each participant with sterile plastic containers to collect a fresh fecal sample at home.

Exclusion criteria for both HC and aMCI + groups included: (1) evidence of psychiatric or other neurological disorders; (2) received antibiotics, prebiotics, or probiotics in past two months; (3) suffered drug or alcohol additions; (4) suffered irritable bowel syndrome or inflammatory bowel diseases within one year; (5) had combined serious heart, liver, kidney or hematopoietic system disorders; (6) with visual, auditory, or motor dysfunctions influencing cognitive performance.

Assessments of neuropsychiatric symptoms

The NPI is a retrospective (up to 1 month) 12-item questionnaire to evaluate the presence and severity of NPS in neurodegenerative disorders [4]. A total score is the sum of each NPI item, obtained by the frequency (from 1 = less than once per week to 4 = once or more per day) × severity (from 1 = mild to 3 = severe) rating in each item. Furthermore, the sum of scores from hallucinations and delusions represented the psychotic composite score; the sum of scores from aberrant motor behavior, aggressiveness, irritability, and disinhibition represented the behavioral composite score; and the sum of scores from depression, apathy, anxiety, sleep, and appetite represented the affective composite score [8].

Fecal sample collection and gut microbiota analysis

Fecal samples were collected from each participant at home using sterile containers. The participants returned the containers by overnight delivery and chilled them with frozen gel packs. These containers were stored at -80 °C until processing. Microbial DNA in each stool sample was extracted using the CatchGene Stool DNA Kit (CatchGene Co., Ltd., Taiwan) from 100 mg sample. The procedures of DNA extraction were prepared in a Class II biologic safety cabinet. DNA concentration was quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). The integrity and size of DNA were assessed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.

The V3-V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was selected for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification using universal primers (357F and 806R) linked with indices and sequencing adaptors. The primers also included the Illumina 5’ overhang adapter sequences for two-step amplicon library building. The detailed protocol of PCR reactions was described in Supplementary methods.

FASTQ sequences were uploaded to Basespace and reads were processed using BaseSpace Onsite 16 S Metagenomics App version 1.1.0 (Illumina). 16 S metagenomics data analysis used DNA from amplicon sequencing of prokaryotic 16 S small subunit rRNA genes with the high-performance version of Ribosomal Database Project Naïve Bayes algorithm [35]. The operational taxonomic unit (OTU) from the 16 S Metagenomics App was exported to a common-separated text file where the results were normalized by converting each OTU to a percentage of the reads from the sample. Any OTU with < 0.1% reads from a given sample were excluded. Resulting OTUs for each sample were utilized to construct relative concentrations of specific phylotypes. After assembling, full length sequences from paired ends were referenced against the Illumina curated version of Greengenes database (May 2013) at 97% identity level. Moreover, diversity indices were computed according to normalized amplicon sequence variant counts by a web-based platform (MicrobiomeAnalyst) [36]. As previously mentioned, microbial diversity was evaluated by alpha diversity (Shannon index, Simpson index, ACE, Chao 1) and beta diversity (Principle coordinates analysis, PCoA) in this study [37].

DTI acquisition and analysis

MRI was acquired using a 3T GE Signa Excite scanner (GE Medical System, Milwaukee, WI, USA). DTI data were obtained using the following parameters: repetition time/echo time/flip angle = 9600 ms/62.7 ms/90°, a 192 × 192 mm2 field of view, b values of 1000 s/mm2 along 64 non-collinear gradient sensitizing directions, and with an isotropic voxel size of 2.2 mm. A null image with no diffusion weighted (b value = 0) was also acquired for DTI reconstruction. High resolution T1-weighted magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo imaging (MPRAGE) scans were obtained using the following parameters: repetition time/echo time/inversion time of 8600 ms/minimal/450 ms, a 256 × 256 mm2 field of view, and a 1-mm slice sagittal thickness with a resolution of 0.5 × 0.5 × 1 mm3 which cover the whole brain.

Data were preprocessed using a MATLAB toolbox called PANDA (Pipeline for Analyzing braiN Diffusion imAges), which was carried out through FMRIB Software Library (FSL 5.0.9, University of Oxford, UK) [38]. After correcting for the eddy current effect and motion artifacts by the FSL’s eddy tool, we used the FSL Brain Extraction Tool to remove non-brain regions from the corrected images [39]. Eventually, main diffusion metrics, including FA, MD, axial diffusivity, and RD, were calculated using FMRIB’s Diffusion Toolbox [40].

Subsequently, a combination of TBSS and atlas-based analysis was performed. PANDA first registered individual FA images of native space to the FMRIB58_FA template in the MNI space with spatial resolution of 1 × 1 × 1 mm3 and then applied the resultant warping transformations to write the images of other diffusion metrics. TBSS averaged all aMCI + subjects’ FA images and acquired a skeletonized image from this average FA. Then, this skeletonized image was projected to each subject’s standardized image. A FA threshold of 0.2 was used to exclude the voxels in gray matter and CSF during the TBSS processing procedure [20]. Finally, the regional average values of skeletonized images were obtained according to ICBM-DTI-81 WM labels atlas which divided the WM atlas into 50 brain regions. In this study, regions of interest were chosen based on previous model [16], including the fornix (column and body of fornix), bilateral cingulate gyrus (CG, cingulum), hippocampus (cingulum), and uncinate fasciculus.

Statistical analyses

Results presented in our study were expressed as the numbers with percentages, means with standard deviation, as appropriate. Statistical analyses were performed by the IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25.0. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to examine the normal distribution of data, and we found that most variables were non-normal distributions. Demographic and clinical profiles of the HC and aMCI + groups were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U or chi-square test, when appropriate. Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare alpha diversity among the different groups. Beta diversity was evaluated using PCoA and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) based on Bray-Curtis distance matrices. Differential abundance analysis was performed at each taxonomic level using Mann-Whitney test. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) method was used to identify the taxa with statistical significance in the comparisons between aMCI + patients and HC, with an alpha value of 0.05 and LDA score of > 2 [41]. Relationship between dysbiotic microbiota, each NPI cluster, and limbic WM integrity in patients with aMCI + were explored using Spearman’s rank correlation, with Benjamini-Hochberg method for correcting multiple comparisons (false discovery rate was set at 0.05). To further examine whether the association of gut microbiota with NPI clusters was mediated by WM disruptions, a regression-based mediation analysis with the bootstrap method (5,000 bootstraps) was employed using Hayes’s PROCESS macro (SPSS model 4, version 4.1) [42]. In this model, only variables that exhibited a significant association with others were deemed the independent variable (gut microbiota), mediator (WM network), and outcome variable (NPI cluster). The mediation effect occurred when the direct effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable decreased with the inclusion of the mediator. A significant indirect effect was also obtained if the 95% confidence interval (CI) did not include zero. All paths were reported as unstandardized regression coefficients (β). Besides, our dataset had no missing data. The multicollinearity assumption was assessed using the variance inflation factor and tolerance values and the normal distribution assumption using residual normality, linearity, and homoscedasticity to satisfy assumptions of a regression-based analysis. The log transformation was applied to address skewed data. For all the statistical comparisons, p < 0.05 was considered as a significant level.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Table 1 shows the detailed demographic and clinical information of the HC and aMCI + groups. Both groups did not significantly differ in terms of age, gender distribution, years of education, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, constipation, or smoking status (p > 0.05). Most patients with aMCI + were treated with AD-related medicines, including donepezil and rivastigmine. Compared to HC, patients with aMCI + exhibited worse cognitive performance (p < 0.001). Patients with aMCI + had more depressive symptoms measured by Geriatric Depression Scale (p < 0.001), but they did not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for clinical depression.

Table 1 Demographics and neuropsychological assessments (mean ± SD)
Full size table

Microbial diversity in aMCI + and HC

No statistical significance of alpha diversity was found between HC and aMCI + groups (Shannon index: U = 230.0, p = 0.429; Simpson index: U = 219.0, p = 0.620; ACE: U = 205.0, p = 0.904; Chao1: U = 204.0, p = 0.925) [Supplementary Fig. 1A]. The PCoA, based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, also did not show significant differences between the two groups (F = 0.994, R2 = 0.025, p = 0.395) [Supplementary Fig. 1B].

Disruption of gut microbiota in aMCI+

The significant alterations of gut microbiota between the HC and aMCI + groups were observed at the genus level [Fig. 1A]. Specifically, the relative abundance of genera Ruminococcus (p = 0.022) and Lactococcus (p = 0.031) was significantly lower in aMCI + group versus HC group. Given the above significant results, we further split the aMCI + group into High-aMCI + and Low-aMCI + groups according to the mean of amyloid burden. However, there were no significant differences in the relative abundance of genera Ruminococcus (p = 0.438) and Lactococcus (p = 0.485) between High-aMCI + and Low-aMCI + groups.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Differential abundance analysis of gut microbiota. (A) Mann-Whitney U test revealed significantly differential abundance of genera Ruminococcus and Lactococcus between aMCI + and HC groups. (B) LEfSe analysis showed significantly differential abundance of genera Ruminococcus and Lactococcus between aMCI+ (positive scores) and HC (negative scores) groups. Negative LDA scores indicated enriched taxa in the HC group (red). The LDA scores (log10) > 2 and p < 0.05 are listed. HC, healthy controls; aMCI+, amyloid-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment; LEfSe, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size

Full size image

As shown in Fig. 1B, we also identified the distribution of certain microbiota at each taxonomic level between the two groups by LEfSe analysis. Compared to HC, patients with aMCI + exhibited significantly less abundance of genera Ruminococcus (LDA score = − 4.11, p = 0.021) and Lactococcus (LDA score = − 2.79, p = 0.030).

Associations between gut microbiota, NPS, and limbic WM in patients with aMCI+

Since significant between-group differences of relative abundance were detected in genera Ruminococcus and Lactococcus, we further investigated whether differentially abundant taxa were associated with the severity of NPS and limbic WM abnormalities in patients with aMCI+. Regarding the NPS, the relative abundance of genus Ruminococcus in aMCI + was negatively correlated with the NPI total score (rho = -0.667, p = 0.001). Based on this significant correlational result, we further divided the NPI into three clusters (i.e., psychotic composite score, behavioral composite score, and affective composite score). The relative abundance of genus Ruminococcus was negatively correlated with the affective composite score (rho = -0.718, adjusted p < 0.001) [Fig. 2]. However, there was no significant relationship between the relative abundance of genus Lactococcus and neuropsychiatric severity in patients with aMCI + after the corrections for multiple comparisons.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Significant association between the relative abundance of Ruminococcus and the affective composite score in patients with amyloid-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment

Full size image

In terms of the limbic WM integrity, the relative abundance of genus Ruminococcus in the aMCI + group was negatively correlated with MD value of the bilateral CG (left: rho = -0.569, adjusted p = 0.032; right: rho = -0.580, adjusted p = 0.032) and RD value of the bilateral CG (left: rho = -0.590, adjusted p = 0.042; right: rho = -0.541, adjusted p = 0.049) [Fig. 3A—B]. No other significant results were found after Benjamini-Hochberg corrections.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Significant associations between the relative abundance of Ruminococcus and white matter alterations (A, mean diffusivity [MD]; B, radial diffusivity [RD]) in the cingulate gyrus in patients with amyloid-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment

Full size image

The association of NPS with limbic WM aberration was further explored. The results showed that in the bilateral CG, the affective composite score was positively correlated with MD value (left: rho = 0.656, adjusted p = 0.014; right: rho = 0.540, adjusted p = 0.049) and RD value (left: rho = 0.651, adjusted p = 0.014) [Fig. 4A—B]. No other significant results were obtained after Benjamini-Hochberg corrections.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Significant associations between the affective composite score and white matter alterations (A, mean diffusivity [MD]; B, radial diffusivity [RD]) in the cingulate gyrus in patients with amyloid-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment

Full size image

The mediating role of the left cingulate gyrus in the relationship between Ruminococcus and the severity of affective impairment

Mediation analysis revealed that the total effect of genus Ruminococcus on the severity of affective symptom cluster was significant in patients with aMCI+ (β = -0.399, p < 0.001). When WM connectivity of the left CG (RD value) was introduced to the model as a mediator, the direct effect remained significant with a decreased magnitude (β = -0.262, p = 0.030), suggesting the impact of genus Ruminococcus on the affective composite score was a partial mediation effect. The indirect effect of WM connectivity in the left CG (RD value) was also significant (β = -0.138, 95% CI [− 0.365, − 0.022]) [Fig. 5]. Additionally, after including the mediator of WM integrity in the bilateral CG (MD value) to the model, we did not observe the mediation effect in these two models (indirect effect = left: β = -0.084, 95% CI [− 0.303, 0.027]; right: β = -0.044, 95% CI [− 0.196, 0.072]) (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Fig. 5
figure 5

(A) Mediation model in patients with aMCI+. (B) Mediation analysis between the relative abundance of Ruminococcus and the affective composite score, with RD value of the left CG as the mediator

aMCI+, amyloid-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment; WM, white matter; RD, radial diffusivity; CG, cingulate gyrus; CI, confidence interval

Full size image

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively explore the impact of gut dysbiosis on NPS and limbic WM connectivity in patients with aMCI+. The main findings of this study were three-fold. Firstly, despite no significant shifts in microbial diversity between the HC and aMCI + groups, the relative abundance of genera Ruminococcus and Lactococcus was markedly decreased in patients with aMCI + versus HC. Secondly, reduced abundance of Ruminococcus was associated with higher severity of the affective symptom cluster and more disrupted WM integrity in the bilateral CG among patients with aMCI+. Finally, the left CG was a significant mediator of the relationship between Ruminococcus and mood disturbance.

The genus Ruminococcus, belonging to phylum Firmicutes, was significantly reduced in patients with aMCI + as compared to HCs. This strain is one of gram-positive bacteria and the producer of propionate, serving a connection with glucose homeostasis and inhibition of cholesterol synthesis [43]. It has been shown that this dysbiotic microbiota would impair the permeability of gut and blood-brain barrier, which promotes the dissemination of intestinal amyloid into the systemic circulation and then deposits in the brain [44]. Besides, several lines of evidence have confirmed that the depleted Ruminococcus is observed in the MCI or dementia stage of AD [15, 44,45,46], which supports our current findings. A recent study further showed that the level of Ruminococcus was elevated in the mice with ochratoxin A-induced cecal injury after probiotic treatment [47]. Therefore, this genus of bacteria is a beneficial strain for humans.

Decreased abundance of genus Lactococcus was also observed in patients with prodromal AD. This genus from phylum Firmicutes has been shown to participate in the production of L-lactic acid from glucose fermentation and the activation of mucosal function and systematic immunity [48]. Prior evidence has revealed that lactic acid prevents neurons from mitochondrial damage caused by the amyloid deposition in AD [49]. Notably, this dysbiotic microbiota may lead to impairments in brain functions, such as decrease in synaptic remodeling, axonal excitability, and neural oxidative metabolism [50]. Furthermore, Lactococcus lactis (genus Lactococcus) has been found to be implicated in the biosynthesis of nicotinamide mononucleotide, which is relevant to anti-aging [51]. Intriguingly, previous studies have discovered that patients with AD manifest lower abundance of Lactococcus than HC [52, 53], aligned with our results found in patients with aMCI+. Hence, this microbial strain may have an advantageous effect on host physiology.

This study showed that WM integrity in the left CG played a partial mediating role in the relationship between the relative abundance of Ruminococcus and the severity of affective symptom cluster in patients with aMCI+. It has been proposed that the effects of the gut microbiota on affective impairments was modulated by microbe-derived neurotransmitters and metabolites [54]. Especially, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin) plays a key role in emotion regulation. Once 5-HT is released by enterochromaffin cells, it can cross the intestinal epithelium and the blood–brain barrier via the circulatory system to reach the brain [55]. Furthermore, Ruminococcus has been reported to participate in tryptophan metabolism, which is associated with the biosynthesis of tryptamine and serotonin [56]. More specifically, tryptamine produced by specific bacteria (e.g., Ruminococcus) is a neuromodulator between the excitatory and inhibitory activity of serotonin; tryptophan is the precursor of serotonin, which is widely discussed for its entangled relationship with mood disorders. Previous studies have shown that reduced circulating concentrations of tryptophan would functionally affect emotions using acute tryptophan depletion protocol [57, 58]. Similarly, it has been found that the relative abundance of Ruminococcus is positively correlated with the levels of serotonin [59], supporting a link between the abundance of Ruminococcus and the severity of affective symptoms in our patients. Data from animal models further demonstrated that dietary interventions alleviated depressive symptoms, as shown by the enriched abundance of Ruminococcus and improvement in depression-induced tryptophan reduction [60]. Therefore, targeting the gut microbial tryptophan metabolism by regulating the endogenous gut microbiota or changing the dietary pattern may indicate alternative strategies to ameliorate mood disorder.

On the neurochemical level, emotional distress in patients with AD is relevant to serotonergic denervation in various brain regions, including the limbic area [61,62,63]. Of note, the CG has consistently been demonstrated a reduction of serotonin transporters or receptors in patients with MCI, which is closely tied to emotion and other cognitive functions. Neuroimaging research showed that aMCI patients with higher levels of apathy exhibited increased MD values in the cingulate region [64]. Likewise, it was reported that the CG lesions along with sleep disorders and apathetic symptoms were observed in those with aMCI or dementia [65, 66]. Moreover, previous literature has indicated that the CG mediates the function of the HPA axis through its projections to the hypothalamus [67]. It should be noted that cingulate dysfunction is associated with the dysregulation of HPA axis. The overactivation of HPA axis would lead to decreased 5-HT receptors binding and increased concentrations of corticosterone [68]. More importantly, the altered gut microbiota may affect the serotonergic system. Evidence from clinical trials has revealed that lower abundance of Ruminococcus in depressive individuals is concomitant with reduced levels of blood tryptophan and serotonin in the CG [67, 69]. Taken together, our findings suggest that the gut microbiota may be a promising target for mitigating the affective symptoms in patients with aMCI+.

The present study has several limitations. First, we cannot fully disentangle physiological interaction between the dysbiotic microbiota (i.e., genera Ruminococcus and Lactococcus) and disease pathologies due to the observational design of the present study. Consequently, these altered strains merit future studies with a longitudinal design to have an in-depth exploration. Second, we could not confirm that HC were amyloid-negative because this group did not have amyloid imaging. Finally, despite the lack of measuring WM integrity in HC, we still reasoned that the disrupted patterns of limbic bundles in aMCI + resulted from AD pathogenesis, as evident by the strict diagnostic criteria of the disease. In the future, we hope to administer the HC group with DTI scans, which may provide more accurate proof of the relationship between the dysbiotic taxa and WM lesions in patients with aMCI+.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that the gut dysbiosis can influence limbic microstructure in patients with aMCI+. Besides, WM integrity in the left CG may be a partial mediator of the association between genus Ruminococcus and affective symptoms, supporting that the MGB axis can conjointly affect emotional behaviors.

Data Availability

Raw FASTQ sequences generated from the 16S amplicon sequencing of fecal DNA are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under Accession Number PRJNA988280 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/988280).

References

  1. Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, Jelic V, Fratiglioni L, Wahlund LO, Nordberg A, Backman L, Albert M, Almkvist O, et al. Mild cognitive impairment–beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on mild cognitive impairment. J Intern Med. 2004;256(3):240–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DeTure MA, Dickson DW. The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14(1):32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cummings J. The National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Framework on Alzheimer’s Disease: application to clinical trials. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15(1):172–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cummings J. The neuropsychiatric inventory: development and applications. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2020;33(2):73–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sherman C, Liu CS, Herrmann N, Lanctot KL. Prevalence, neurobiology, and treatments for apathy in prodromal Dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2018;30(2):177–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin E, Velayudhan L. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in mild cognitive impairment: a Literature Review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2020;49(2):146–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gauthier S, Cummings J, Ballard C, Brodaty H, Grossberg G, Robert P, Lyketsos C. Management of behavioral problems in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010;22(3):346–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang YT, Hsu JL, Huang SH, Hsu SW, Lee CC, Chang CC. Functional connectome and neuropsychiatric symptom clusters of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Affect Disord. 2020;273:48–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cryan JF, O’Riordan KJ, Cowan CSM, Sandhu KV, Bastiaanssen TFS, Boehme M, Codagnone MG, Cussotto S, Fulling C, Golubeva AV, et al. The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(4):1877–2013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Drljaca J, Milosevic N, Milanovic M, Abenavoli L, Milic N. When the microbiome helps the brain-current evidence. CNS Neurosci Ther; 2023.

  11. Nagu P, Parashar A, Behl T, Mehta V. Gut microbiota composition and epigenetic molecular changes connected to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Mol Neurosci. 2021;71(7):1436–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers GB, Keating DJ, Young RL, Wong ML, Licinio J, Wesselingh S. From gut dysbiosis to altered brain function and mental Illness: mechanisms and pathways. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21(6):738–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Du Y, Gao XR, Peng L, Ge JF. Crosstalk between the microbiota-gut-brain axis and depression. Heliyon. 2020;6(6):e04097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jee HJ, Ryu D, Kim S, Yeon SH, Son RH, Hwang SH, Jung YS. Fermented Perilla frutescens ameliorates Depression-like Behavior in Sleep-Deprivation-Induced stress model. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 24(1).

  15. Zhou Y, Wang Y, Quan M, Zhao H, Jia J. Gut microbiota changes and their correlation with cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;81(2):583–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Catani M, Dell’acqua F, Thiebaut de Schotten M. A revised limbic system model for memory, emotion and behaviour. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(8):1724–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Papez JW. A proposed mechanism of emotion. 1937. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995;7(1):103–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Remy F, Vayssiere N, Saint-Aubert L, Barbeau E, Pariente J. White matter disruption at the prodromal stage of Alzheimer’s Disease: relationships with hippocampal atrophy and episodic memory performance. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;7:482–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang B, Xu Y, Zhu B, Kantarci K. The role of diffusion tensor imaging in detecting microstructural changes in prodromal Alzheimer’s Disease. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2014;20(1):3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, Watkins KE, Ciccarelli O, Cader MZ, Matthews PM, et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. NeuroImage. 2006;31(4):1487–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Setiadi TM, Martens S, Opmeer EM, Marsman JC, Tumati S, Reesink FE, De Deyn PP, Aleman A, Curcic-Blake B. Widespread white matter aberration is associated with the severity of apathy in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: Tract-based spatial statistics analysis. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;29:102567.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Li W, Muftuler LT, Chen G, Ward BD, Budde MD, Jones JL, Franczak MB, Antuono PG, Li SJ, Goveas JS. Effects of the coexistence of late-life depression and mild cognitive impairment on white matter microstructure. J Neurol Sci. 2014;338(1–2):46–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moschopoulos C, Kratimenos P, Koutroulis I, Shah BV, Mowes A, Bhandari V. The neurodevelopmental perspective of Surgical Necrotizing enterocolitis: the role of the gut-brain Axis. Mediators Inflamm. 2018. 2018:7456857.

  24. Donato L, Alibrandi S, Scimone C, Castagnetti A, Rao G, Sidoti A, D’Angelo R. Gut-Brain Axis Cross-talk and Limbic disorders as Biological basis of secondary TMAU. J Pers Med 2021; 11(2).

  25. Jones MP, Dilley JB, Drossman D, Crowell MD. Brain-gut connections in functional GI disorders: anatomic and physiologic relationships. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;18(2):91–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cai H, Wang C, Qian Y, Zhang S, Zhang C, Zhao W, Zhang T, Zhang B, Chen J, Liu S, et al. Large-scale functional network connectivity mediate the associations of gut microbiota with sleep quality and executive functions. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42(10):3088–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang X, Li L, Ling Z, Gao L, Chen H, Duan X. Gut microbiome diversity mediates the association between right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anxiety level. Brain Imaging Behav. 2022;16(1):397–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fernandez-Real JM, Serino M, Blasco G, Puig J, Daunis-i-Estadella J, Ricart W, Burcelin R, Fernandez-Aranda F, Portero-Otin M. Gut microbiota interacts with brain microstructure and function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(12):4505–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tillisch K, Labus J, Kilpatrick L, Jiang Z, Stains J, Ebrat B, Guyonnet D, Legrain-Raspaud S, Trotin B, Naliboff B, et al. Consumption of fermented milk product with probiotic modulates brain activity. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(7):1394–401. 401 e1-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee SM, Milillo MM, Krause-Sorio B, Siddarth P, Kilpatrick L, Narr KL, Jacobs JP, Lavretsky H. Gut microbiome diversity and abundance correlate with Gray Matter volume (GMV) in older adults with Depression. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19(4).

  31. Tsai CF, Chuang CH, Wang YP, Lin YB, Tu PC, Liu PY, Wu PS, Lin CY, Lu CL. Differences in gut microbiota correlate with symptoms and regional brain volumes in patients with late-life depression. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:885393.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Petersen RC, Negash S. Mild cognitive impairment: an overview. CNS Spectr. 2008;13(1):45–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Klunk WE, Koeppe RA, Price JC, Benzinger TL, Devous MD, Sr., Jagust WJ, Johnson KA, Mathis CA, Minhas D, Pontecorvo MJ, et al. The Centiloid Project: standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(1):1–15e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chang YT, Huang CW, Chen NC, Lin KJ, Huang SH, Chang WN, Hsu SW, Hsu CW, Chen HH, Chang CC. Hippocampal amyloid burden with downstream Fusiform Gyrus Atrophy correlate with Face Matching Task scores in Early Stage Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(16):5261–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Chong J, Liu P, Zhou G, Xia J. Using MicrobiomeAnalyst for comprehensive statistical, functional, and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nat Protoc. 2020;15(3):799–821.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu P, Wu L, Peng G, Han Y, Tang R, Ge J, Zhang L, Jia L, Yue S, Zhou K, et al. Altered microbiomes distinguish Alzheimer’s Disease from amnestic mild cognitive impairment and health in a Chinese cohort. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;80:633–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cui Z, Zhong S, Xu P, He Y, Gong G. PANDA: a pipeline toolbox for analyzing brain diffusion images. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17(3):143–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Behrens TE, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MF, Woolrich MW. Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: what can we gain? Neuroimage 2007; 34(1):144–55.

  41. Qian Y, Yang X, Xu S, Wu C, Song Y, Qin N, Chen SD, Xiao Q. Alteration of the fecal microbiota in Chinese patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;70:194–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Igartua JJ, Hayes AF. Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: concepts, computations, and some common confusions. Span J Psychol. 2021;24:e49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Goncalves D, Vinera J, Zitoun C, Duchampt A, Backhed F, Mithieux G. Microbiota-generated metabolites promote metabolic benefits via gut-brain neural circuits. Cell. 2014;156(1–2):84–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang L, Wang Y, Xiayu X, Shi C, Chen W, Song N, Fu X, Zhou R, Xu YF, Huang L, et al. Altered gut microbiota in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(4):1241–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu P, Jia XZ, Chen Y, Yu Y, Zhang K, Lin YJ, Wang BH, Peng GP. Gut microbiota interacts with intrinsic brain activity of patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2021;27(2):163–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Fan KC, Lin CC, Liu YC, Chao YP, Lai YJ, Chiu YL, Chuang YF. Altered gut microbiota in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a case-control study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023;15:1162057.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Du G, Chang S, Guo Q, Yan X, Chen H, Shi K, Yuan Y, Yue T. Protective effects of tibetan kefir in mice with ochratoxin A-induced cecal injury. Food Res Int. 2022;158:111551.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Saraoui T, Leroi F, Bjorkroth J, Pilet MF. Lactococcus piscium: a psychrotrophic lactic acid bacterium with bioprotective or spoilage activity in food-a review. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;121(4):907–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Soucek T, Cumming R, Dargusch R, Maher P, Schubert D. The regulation of glucose metabolism by HIF-1 mediates a neuroprotective response to amyloid beta peptide. Neuron. 2003;39(1):43–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chen X, Zhang Y, Wang H, Liu L, Li W, Xie P. The regulatory effects of lactic acid on Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Discover Mental Health. 2022;2:8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Kong LH, Liu TY, Yao QS, Zhang XH, Xu WN, Qin JY. Enhancing the biosynthesis of nicotinamide mononucleotide in Lactococcus lactis by heterologous expression of FtnadE. J Sci Food Agric 2022.

  52. Vogt NM, Kerby RL, Dill-McFarland KA, Harding SJ, Merluzzi AP, Johnson SC, Carlsson CM, Asthana S, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, et al. Gut microbiome alterations in Alzheimer’s Disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13537.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ghorbani M, Ferreira D, Maioli S. A metagenomic study of gut viral markers in amyloid-positive Alzheimer’s Disease patients. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023;15(1):141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Crost EH, Coletto E, Bell A, Juge N. Ruminococcus gnavus: friend or foe for human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2023; 47(2).

  55. Roager HM, Licht TR. Microbial tryptophan catabolites in health and Disease. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Dehhaghi M, Kazemi Shariat Panahi H, Guillemin GJ. Microorganisms, Tryptophan Metabolism, and Kynurenine Pathway: a Complex interconnected Loop Influencing Human Health Status. Int J Tryptophan Res. 2019;12:1178646919852996.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Young SN. Acute tryptophan depletion in humans: a review of theoretical, practical and ethical aspects. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2013;38(5):294–305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Hood SD, Bell CJ, Nutt DJ. Acute tryptophan depletion. Part I: rationale and methodology. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39(7):558–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhao R, Zhou Y, Shi H, Ye W, Lyu Y, Wen Z, Li R, Xu Y. Effect of gestational Diabetes on Postpartum Depression-like behavior in rats and its mechanism. Volume 14. Nutrients; 2022. 6.

  60. Orosco M, Rouch C, Beslot F, Feurte S, Regnault A, Dauge V. Alpha-lactalbumin-enriched diets enhance serotonin release and induce anxiolytic and rewarding effects in the rat. Behav Brain Res. 2004;148(1–2):1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Klaassens BL, van Gerven JMA, Klaassen ES, van der Grond J, Rombouts S. Cholinergic and serotonergic modulation of resting state functional brain connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 2019; 199:143 – 52.

  62. Smith GS, Barrett FS, Joo JH, Nassery N, Savonenko A, Sodums DJ, Marano CM, Munro CA, Brandt J, Kraut MA, et al. Molecular imaging of serotonin degeneration in mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;105:33–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Barrett FS, Workman CI, Sair HI, Savonenko AV, Kraut MA, Sodums DJ, Joo JJ, Nassery N, Marano CM, Munro CA, et al. Association between serotonin denervation and resting-state functional connectivity in mild cognitive impairment. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38(7):3391–401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Cacciari C, Moraschi M, Di Paola M, Cherubini A, Orfei MD, Giove F, Maraviglia B, Caltagirone C, Spalletta G. White matter microstructure and apathy level in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(2):501–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hahn C, Lim HK, Won WY, Ahn KJ, Jung WS, Lee CU. Apathy and white matter integrity in Alzheimer’s Disease: a whole brain analysis with tract-based spatial statistics. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e53493.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Tighe SK, Oishi K, Mori S, Smith GS, Albert M, Lyketsos CG, Mielke MM. Diffusion tensor imaging of neuropsychiatric symptoms in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s Dementia. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012;24(4):484–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Winter G, Hart RA, Charlesworth RPG, Sharpley CF. Gut microbiome and depression: what we know and what we need to know. Rev Neurosci. 2018;29(6):629–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Sierksma AS, van den Hove DL, Steinbusch HW, Prickaerts J. Major depression, cognitive dysfunction and Alzheimer’s Disease: is there a link? Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;626(1):72–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Foster JA, McVey Neufeld KA. Gut-brain axis: how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36(5):305–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CMRPD1K0061, CMRPD1K0581, CMRPG8J0524, CMRPG8J0843, CMRPG8K1533), Chang Gung University (BMRPE25), Healthy Aging Research Center, Chang Gung University from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the Framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan (EMRPD1K0431), Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST-108-2628-B-182-002, MOST-109-2628-B-182-012, MOST-110-2628-B-182-010, MOST-111-2314-B-182 A-143), and National Science and Technology Council (NSTC-112-2410-H-182-030) Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, 333, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Chun-Che Hung & Chia-Hsiung Cheng

  2. Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Neural Dynamics (BIND Lab), Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Chun-Che Hung & Chia-Hsiung Cheng

  3. Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Yi-Ping Chao

  4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan

    Yi-Ping Chao

  5. Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Yejin Lee

  6. Department of Neurology, Institute for Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung university College of Medicine, No. 123 Ta-Pei Rd., Niau-Sung Dist, 833, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Chi-Wei Huang & Chiung-Chih Chang

  7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Shu-Hua Huang

  8. Healthy Aging Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Chia-Hsiung Cheng

  9. Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan

    Chia-Hsiung Cheng

Authors
  1. Chun-Che Hung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi-Ping Chao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yejin Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chi-Wei Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shu-Hua Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chiung-Chih Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chia-Hsiung Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceived and designed the work: CCC, CHC. Acquired the data: CWH, SHH, CCC. Analyzed the data: CCH, YPC, YL. Participated in the discussion and provided the comments: CCH, YPC, YL, CWH, SHH, CCC, CHC. Wrote the paper: CCH. All of the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chiung-Chih Chang or Chia-Hsiung Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan. All experiments were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations (Declaration of Helsinki). All participants provided written informed consent before participating in this study.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hung, CC., Chao, YP., Lee, Y. et al. Cingulate white matter mediates the effects of fecal Ruminococcus on neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with amyloid-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatr 23, 720 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04417-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04417-9

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us