Skip to main content
Download PDF

The impact of health education interventions on oral health promotion among older people: a systematic review

BMC Geriatrics volume 23, Article number: 548 (2023) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 05 December 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

One of the most common pathologic changes in older people is oral and dental problems. The oral health of older people is a public health concern. Promotion of good oral health for this cohort will have beneficial impacts on the longer-term quality of life. This study aimed to identify the types of health education interventions for the oral health of older people and to determine their effects on the oral and dental health of older people.

Methods

Potential articles were retrieved from four electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Embase) up to 31 September 2022 in English without limit of time. Experimental and quasi-experimental interventional studies investigating the impact of educational interventions on oral and dental health among older people over 60 years old in both sexes were considered. The quality assessment tool was the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP).

Results

In the initial search, 1104 articles were retrieved. Finally, according to the inclusion criteria, 23 studies (seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCT) and six quasi-experimental studies) were reviewed. In this review, educational interventions for older people and their caregivers are classified. Theoretical frameworks were used in only three interventions related to older people. Outcome measures were both self-reported and objective measures. Fifteen of the included studies were of moderate quality.

Conclusion

This review provides evidence that the use of oral and dental health educational interventions was effective in improving the oral health of older people. Educational interventions were carried out both among older people and among their caregivers. Although a variety of interventions were used in the reviewed studies, more lectures were used in the interventions related to older people. In the interventions related to caregivers, in addition to lectures, practical education was also used. It is recommended to perform higher quality studies for assessing the effectiveness of interventions in this field.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The improvement of living conditions and the increase in life expectancy have led to the phenomenon of aging in societies [1], in such a way that it has become one of the challenges of public health all over the world [2]. According to the report of the World Health Organization, between 2015 and 2050, the proportion of the population over 60 will almost double from 12 to 22% [3]. The aging process includes a natural course in which many physiological and psychological changes occur in the body [4]. Oral and dental problems are generally pathological processes that may also result from the aging process. These problems include tooth loss, dry mouth, gum disease, tooth decay, oral mucosa disorders, and chewing disorders [5]. These changes can affect the quality of life of older people [6].

One of the important concerns for public health is the improvement of older people's health, which can lead to an improved quality of life among them [7]. The evidence indicates that oral and dental health problems among older people have been given less attention compared to cardiovascular or neoplastic diseases [8, 9]. Oral and dental health means the health of the oral cavity and its related tissues. Good oral health facilitates a person for eating, speaking and social interaction [10]. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) is a complex concept that consists of four dimensions: functional factors, psychological factors, social factors, and experience of pain or discomfort [11]. Patients with poor oral and dental health may have lower mood, more life stress and reduced quality of life [12]. Some older people have many oral and dental problems that can negatively affect their physical or psychosocial health. For example, it can lead to a reduction in fruit and vegetable consumption in older people [13]. This nutritional style can cause nutritional disorders in older people [14, 15]. Often, older people with dentures complain of a wide range of problems including eating, social interaction, and communication, and these problems have a detrimental effect on their quality of life [16].

In recent years, in order to improve the oral health-related quality of life, attention has been focused on evaluating the effectiveness of oral health education programs. A number of systematic reviews have been conducted on the available evidence, the results of which have shown that oral health education can be effective in the short term in increasing knowledge and to some extent behaviors such as brushing teeth and healthy eating [17]. Considering the phenomenon of aging and the importance of the health and quality of life of older people, which is affected by various factors such as oral and dental hygiene, the importance of prevention and the need for appropriate interventions to improve the health of older people are felt. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the types of health education interventions and to determine their effects on oral and dental health in older people.

Methods

This study was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [18]. This systematic review as approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (No. IR.UMSHA.REC.1400. 829).

Search strategy

Potential articles were retrieved from four electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Scopus, web of sciences, and Embase) up to 31 September 2022 in English without limit of time. The search strategy was developed using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). We used the keywords of Wang et al.'s study as a basis [19]. The keywords were considered based on Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study design (PICOS) as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in this study [20]. The search strategy for PubMed/Medline is described in Appendix 1.

Population

Older people over 60 years old in both sexes without cognitive impairment/dementia were considered.

Intervention

All interventional studies investigating the effect of educational interventions on oral and dental health were included in the study. These educational interventions could involve older people or their caregivers. The use of the theoretical framework in the reviewed studies was also investigated.

Compare

Interventional studies with all types of comparatives were included in this study.

Outcome

Promoting oral and dental health in older people was the first outcome. The second outcome was the quality of life related to oral health.

Selection of studies

The results of initial searches were independently screened by two authors according to titles, abstracts, and full texts. Any disagreement among the researchers regarding the exclusion or inclusion of articles in the study was resolved with discussion. All searched articles in the initial search were entered into EndNote X8 software.

Study eligibility

Experimental and quasi-experimental interventional studies investigating the impact of educational interventions on oral and dental health among older people over 60 years old in both sexes were considered. Descriptive, qualitative, review studies, letters and correspondences, editorials, conference proceedings and studies that consider oral and dental health along with other interventions to perform other health behaviors were excluded.

Data extraction

Data was independently extracted by two authors (PF and SK). Any discrepancy was resolved through discussion. The extracted information included the following: first author (year), country, study design, study population (age, gender), study groups, description of intervention and control, and oral health main findings. In this study, the results of data extraction are independently presented based on the subjects of intervention (older people and caregivers). After completing the search in the mentioned databases, it was found that the educational interventions related to the oral and dental health of older people were carried out in two ways: directly (the target group was the older people themselves) and indirectly (the target group was the caregivers of older people). For this reason, the classification of studies was carried out by the research team in the current form in order to provide the possibility of comparison.

Quality assessment tool

The included studies were independently evaluated by two authors using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool [21].

This tool has six subscales including selection bias, study design, confounding, blinding, data collection methods, and withdrawals/drop-outs. Any disagreement among the researchers regarding the scoring of the quality assessment tool was resolved by discussion or by a third author. Inter-rater reliability was approved by Cohen’s Kappa coefficient. Cohen suggested the Kappa result be interpreted as follows: values ≤ 0 as indicating no agreement and 0.01–0.20 as none to slight, 0.21–0.40 as fair, 0.41– 0.60 as moderate, 0.61–0.80 as substantial, and 0.81–1.00 as almost perfect agreement [22]. None of the studies were excluded based on quality assessment results.

Results

Results of the searched studies

1102 articles were retrieved from the four electronic databases; PubMed/Medline (n = 122), Scopus (n = 580), Web of Sciences (n = 297), and Embase (n = 103). To minimize retrieval bias, the inclusion criteria were manually checked for additional eligible documents that could have been missed during the mentioned database and grey literature search (n = 2). Finally, 1104 articles were retrieved in the initial search. Duplicated items were identified using EndNote X8 software and manually removed from the articles file. After removing duplicates, 830 articles remained. Of these articles, 793 articles were excluded because they were not in line with the objectives of the study. Then, 37 articles were screened. Three articles were excluded from the screening stage. In the next step, the full texts of 34 eligible articles were assessed. Finally, 23 articles were reviewed in this systematic review (Fig. 1). Details of the included final studies are presented in Tables 1 and 2 based on the subjects of intervention (older people and caregivers).

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram of the systematic review and meta-analysis selection process

Full size image
Table 1 Effectiveness of intervention to oral health promotion among older people
Full size table
Table 2 Effectiveness of interventions to oral health promotion of older people among their caregivers
Full size table

Design of the studies

In 14 studies, interventions were related to older people [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. The ten studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT) studies [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32] and four studies had quasi-experimental design [33,34,35,36]. Of the 23 included studies, nine studies were related to the caregivers of older people [37,38,39,40,41,42,43], that seven studies had RCT design [37,38,39,40,41,42,43] and two studies were quasi-experimental studies [44, 45]. Totally, there were 17 randomized controlled trials (RCT) studies [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32, 37,38,39,40,41,42,43] and six studies had quasi experimental design [33,34,35,36, 44, 45].

Study time and settings

Nine studies were published in 2018 or later [23,24,25, 30, 31, 33, 36, 42, 43]. Four studies were carried out in the UK [29, 37, 38, 44], three studies in Thailand [23, 28, 35], three in South Korea [24, 25, 33], two in USA [27, 31], two in Sweden [43, 45], two in India [39, 40], one in Japan [26], one in Australia [34], one in Taiwan [36], one in China [32], One in Iran [30], one in Germany [42], and one in Canada [41].

Participants and follow-up duration

Most studies had a sample size less than 200 [23,24,25,26, 28, 31, 33,34,35,36, 39, 43, 44]. Fifteen studies were conducted among older people [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Nine studies focused on caregivers of older people [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. The follow-up duration for one study was 36 months [27], one study 18 months [44], three studies were 12 months [31, 42, 45], one study nine months [44], six studies six months [28, 37,38,39,40, 42], six studies three months [23, 28, 35, 41, 43, 44], one study two months [29], three studies six weeks [24, 25, 33], four studies one month [30], and four studies without any follow-up [26, 32, 34, 36]. In fact, one study had three follow-ups [44] and five studies had two follow-ups [23, 28, 37, 38, 42].

Theoretical framework usage

Theoretical frameworks have been used only in interventions related to older people. Of all the included studies, only 13% of them used theoretical framework. These studies include the Health Belief Model (HBM) in the study of Keyong et al., [23], adult learning theory in the study of Shokouhi et al., [30], and Social Cognitive Theory (SCL) in the study of Mariño et al. [34]. The Health Belief Model (HBM) as a conceptual framework in health education research was applied to improve self-management. The HBM can to predict behaviors according to constructs such as perceived susceptibility (person’s belief about chances of getting a disease or harmful situation), perceived severity (person’s belief about danger of a disease or harmful situation), perceived benefits (person’s belief regarding benefits to risk reduction of getting a disease or harmful situation), perceived barriers (person’s belief regarding costs of new behavior), cues to action (feel the necessity to take action), and self-efficacy (feel confident for the ability to perform a behavior) [46]. The adult learning theory refers to an organized process for raising the awareness, cognition, and skills of adults in order to be able to move towards excellence and evolution. The experience of people in the learning process and adults’ desire to learn without any compulsion are an important role in this theory [47]. The Social Cognitive Theory (SCL) helps to explain the interaction of the individual, environment, and behavior on behaviors [48]. The results of a review of eHealth intervention revealed that the majority of studies were based on SCT [47].

Types of intervention

In the included studies of this review, educational interventions have been used for changing behavior or improving attitudes and increase awareness of oral health. In this review, educational interventions were provided for both older people [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36] and caregivers [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. In the related interventions to older people, different educational methods have been used such as lectures [23, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33, 36], mobile apps [24, 25], workbooks [25, 33], web based [34], educational video [28], motivational interviewing [30, 31, 35], and sending educational messages [30].

Also, the related interventions to caregivers included lectures [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45], a live demonstration of oral hygiene techniques on study models [39], to provide oral health education CD and manual to the respective institutions [39], a videotape about oral health [44, 45], CD-ROM and full color pocket book about intensive training in mouth care [44], practical training with different types of prosthetic restoration by using typodonts [42], and hands-on guidance about oral hygiene procedures and discussions on oral care routines [43]. In one study, multifaceted programs including in-person training (individual training and group discussion) and non-attendance training (sending educational messages) were used [30].

Types of outcome measures

From the results of 23 reviewed studies, 20 studies used self-reports as one of the outcome measurement methods [23,24,25,26, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40, 42, 43, 45]. In the related interventions to older people, the self-report measured variables included attitude [34, 35], knowledge [23,24,25, 27, 31, 33,34,35], oral health perceptions [23, 25], oral health recognition [33], self-efficacy [31, 34], oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) [30, 31], oral health literacy [36], practices [34, 35], and skills of oral health [23,24,25, 27, 33,34,35]. In the related interventions to caregivers, the self-report measured variables included attitude [37, 38, 43, 45], knowledge [37,38,39,40, 42, 45], and performance of oral health [38].

Also, in the reviewed studies, objective measures were used to evaluate the effects of interventions. Objective measures are contained below:

1) In interventions related to older people, these items included tongue pressure, unstimulated salivary flow rate [24], resting salivation in the second and third cumulated Repetitive Saliva Swallowing Test times [26], plaque score [23, 28, 35], clinical attachment level (CAL) [35], gingival inflammation [23], clinical attachment loss [23, 28], percentage of bleeding on probing (BOP) [35], probing depth [28], root surfaces with new caries [28], active root caries surfaces [28], subjective oral dryness [24], O’Leary index [25, 33], tongue coating index [25, 33], bitterness threshold [26], coronal caries events [27], root caries events [27], gingival index score [28, 35], pocket depth [35], and glycemic indexes (glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG)) [28, 35].

2) In interventions related to the caregivers, the items of objective measures included oral health scores [38, 45], denture hygiene [44], plaque control record [42], Denture Hygiene Index (DHI) [42], plaque levels [43], denture plaque score [38, 40], denture stomatitis score [38, 40, 44], debris score [40], the number of residents wearing dentures overnight [44], oral mucosal disease [44], angular cheilitis [44], revised oral assessment guide gums and lips scores [43], gingival bleeding [43], and plaque score [40].

The effects of interventions

In the related interventions to older people, the self-report measured variables improved including attitude [34, 35], knowledge [23,24,25, 27, 31, 33,34,35], oral health perceptions [23, 25], oral health recognition [33], self-efficacy [31, 34], oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) [30, 31], oral health literacy [36], practices [34, 35], and skills of oral health [23,24,25, 27, 33,34,35]. In the related interventions to caregivers, the self-report measured variables improved including attitude [37, 38, 43, 45], knowledge [37,38,39,40, 42, 45], and performance of oral health [38].

The interventions in older people and caregivers have led to improvement or decreasing the below objective measures.

In the related interventions to older people, the improved objective measures included tongue pressure, unstimulated salivary flow rate [24], resting salivation in the second and third cumulated Repetitive Saliva Swallowing Test times [26] and decreased items included plaque score [23, 28, 35], clinical attachment level (CAL) [35], gingival inflammation [23], clinical attachment loss [23, 28], percentage of bleeding on probing (BOP) [35], probing depth [28], root surfaces with new caries [28], a great number of active root caries surfaces [28], subjective oral dryness [24], O’Leary index [25, 33], tongue coating index [25, 33], bitterness threshold [26], coronal caries events [27], root caries events [27], gingival index score [28, 35], pocket depth [35], and glycemic indexes (glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG)) [28, 35].

In the related interventions to caregivers, the improved objective measures included the following: oral health scores [38, 45], denture hygiene [44], plaque control record (PCR) [42], denture hygiene index (DHI) [42], and plaque levels [43], and the objective measures included reduction of items such as denture plaque score [38, 40], denture stomatitis score [38, 40, 44], debris score [40], the number of residents wearing dentures overnight [44], oral mucosal disease [44], angular cheilitis [44], revised oral assessment guide gums and lips scores.

[43], gingival bleeding [43], and plaque score [40]. In one study, intervention group was not significantly different from baseline [41].

Risk of bias of the included studies

We did not exclude studies based on the results of the quality assessment. Inter-rater agreement varied across EPHPP components ratings. Overall, there was a good agreement between the two reviewers (Kappa coefficient = 0.80, p < 0.001). Fifteen studies of the included studies were of moderate quality and eight studies were weak quality (Table 3).

Table 3 Quality assessment using EPHPP quality rating
Full size table

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, there are no systematic reviews to identify the types of health education interventions and to determine their effects on oral and dental health among older people. As mentioned previously, older people have many oral and dental problems that can negatively affect their physical or psychosocial health [14, 15]. This situation is exacerbated in some older people, such as older people with cognitive impairment/ dementia. Evidence shows that cognitive impairment and dementia influence oral-dental health and these disorders lead to the reduction of dental service use. According to the study of Jockusch et al., with increasing cognitive impairment/dementia among older people, there was a significant difference in the number of decayed teeth. Also, with increasing dementia, the degree.

of restoration decreased and oral/denture hygiene declined significantly [49]. So, studies that have done interventions for the oral and dental health of older people with cognitive impairment/ dementia disorders were excluded from this review. The results of the current study demonstrated that the majority of the included studies had randomized controlled trials design (17/23). Eight studies (34%) were categorized as low quality. As is clear, randomized clinical trials are the best method for controlling selection and confounding biases [50, 51]. Quasi-experimental designs, due to the lack of random allocation, cannot express the effect of an intervention as clearly as experimental studies [52]. In this review, although 17 studies were randomized controlled trials, six of them were of low quality. It seems that in the future studies in the field of oral and dental health of older people, it is necessary to conduct more high-quality randomized clinical trial studies. In this review, it was found that theoretical frameworks had been used in only three interventions related to older people (13%). These studies include the Health Belief Model (HBM) in the study of Keyong et al., [23], adult learning theory in the study of Shokouhi et al., [30], and Social Cognitive Theory (SCL) in the study of Mariño et al. [34]. Evidence indicates that interventions aimed at changing or modifying behavior would be more effective if they are designed and implemented based on a suitable theoretical frameworks [53, 54], because theoretical frameworks offer a systematic approach to a better understanding of phenomena by providing explanations related to why and under what conditions. In other words, for more effectiveness of educational programs, it is recommended to use theoretical frameworks of health education and health promotion [55]. Results demonstrated that using the mentioned theoretical frameworks led to improved oral health perception, behavior, and oral health status [23], improved oral health knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy [34], and improved oral health-related quality of life among older people [30]. In this review, we could not discuss in detail the quality and effectiveness of framework-based interventions for two reasons: a) Frameworks were used in only three studies. b) Due to the use of different frameworks in the design of interventions, the outcomes were not the same, so that we could compare them.

Also, the results of this review show that although a variety of interventions were used in the reviewed studies, more lectures were used in the interventions related to older people [23, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33, 36]. In the interventions related to caregivers, in addition to lectures [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45], practical training was also used [39, 42,43,44]. Some of the educational lectures in the interventions related to older people or caregivers were: oral hygiene instruction, facial and tongue muscle exercise, and salivary gland massage [26], and toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste, cleaning dentures, and self-check oral health [28], and the importance of oral health, common oral health problems among older people (coronal and root dental caries, gingivitis, periodontitis, oral cancer), and oral hygiene self-care (flossing, brushing, rinsing, and denture care) [31]. Also, some of the practical education included a live demonstration of oral hygiene techniques on study models [39], brushing techniques for teeth/prostheses, and handling of interdental space brushes [42], and tooth brushing, denture care, and a variety of oral hygiene aids [44]. In fact, the majority of interventions used traditional methods for education, and only one study used web-based oral health presentations for the older people [34]. The finding of a review of interventional studies in Iran about investigating the effect of different educational methods in preventing disease in elderly people showed that no study had used electronical interventions using social networking software (Telegram, WhatsApp, etc.), web-based, or e-mail-based interventions. In other words, all studies had used traditional approaches for modifiying lifestyle and promoting health behaviors [56]. It seems that although the traditional methods of education are more pleasant and comfortable for older people and even caregivers, in the digital age, it is necessary to use new technologies in the education of older people. Indeed, the reduced use of new technologies by older people compared to other age groups has caused the digital divide. One of the effective ways to overcome this problem is to help older people accept new information and communication technologies [57]. The evidence shows that various theoretical frameworks have been used to accept technology in older people, such as diffusion of innovations [58], theory of reasoned action [59], and theory of planned behavior [56, 60]. The use of new technologies not only provides support services such as remote care for older people, but also improves their quality of life and individual independence. Further studies are recommended in the area of educational methods and comparison of these methods [56].

From the results of 23 reviewed studies, 20 studies used self-reports as one of the outcome measurement methods [23,24,25,26, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40, 42, 43, 45]. In interventions related to older people, more self-report variables were measured than interventions related to caregivers. In the related interventions to caregivers, the self-report measured variables included attitude [37, 38, 43, 45], knowledge [37,38,39,40, 42, 45], and performance of oral health [38], which all self-report measured variables were improved compared to before the intervention. In the interventions related to older people and caregivers, a wide variety of objective outcomes were measured, so it was practically impossible to compare the outcomes of the interventions. Only plaque score was measured both in interventions related to older people [23, 28, 35] and in interventions related to caregivers [40]. In the study of Khanagar et al., (2015) led to a significant reduction of mean plaque score from a baseline score of 3.17 ± 0.40 to 1.57 ± 0.35 post-intervention (six-month) [40]. Also, in the studies of keyong et al., (2019), Saengtipbovorn et al., (2015), and Saengtipbovorn et al., (2014) in older people led to a significant reduction of mean plaque score at baseline score compared to post-intervention (3.28 ± 1.03 Vs. 2.69 ± 0.56, 0.04 ± 0.07 Vs. 0.23 ± 0.07, and 0.59 ± 0.42 Vs. 0.26 ± 0.31, respectively). These results show that the reduction of the mean plaque score in the intervention related to caregivers was reported more than the interventions related to older people. It seems that considering this index in interventions related to caregivers will be more effective. Dental plaque is a biofilm of microorganisms on the tooth surface that plays an important role in the spread of caries and periodontal disease [61]. Gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria that are present on the surface of dental plaque can cause gingivitis and, if left untreated, can create periodontitis [62]. Some factors such as poor and insufficient oral health status and the use of prosthesis lead to promote the creation and accumulation of plaque in older people [63]. Plaque control is an effective way to treat and prevent gingivitis and is an essential part of all methods of treating and preventing periodontal diseases [64]. Although mechanical control of plaque is the most reliable method of oral hygiene, plaque control by brushing alone is not enough to control periodontal diseases [65]. The use of chemical substances such as mouthwashes, gel and antimicrobial toothpaste is of particular importance [66, 67]. The results of a current scoping review demonstrated that mechanical, chemical and educational strategies are effective in dental plaque control in older people [68].

Strengths and limitations

The most important strength of this study was that the current study was the first systematic review in order to identify the types of health education interventions and to determine their effects on oral and dental health in older people. Considering the role of interventions in improving the oral and dental health of older people in the reviewed studies, it seems that interested researchers can use the experiences of these studies in the design and implementation of interventions according to the characteristics of their studied society. This review had some limitations. First of all, we included only studies in English. The second limitation was the lack of access to the full text of some articles. The third limitation was that although the current study includes numerous RCTs, many of them have very low sample size and imbalance in the sample size of the studied groups. It is possible that, despite being RCTs, the strength of evidence is less than ideal. Finally, the results may have a degree of selection bias because of ignoring gray literature, unpublished studies, and studies published in other databases.

Conclusion

This review provides evidence that the use of oral and dental health educational interventions was effective in improving the oral health of older people. Educational interventions were carried out both among older people and among their caregivers. Although a variety of interventions were used in the reviewed studies, more lectures were used in the interventions related to older people. In the interventions related to caregivers, in addition to lectures, practical education was also used. It is recommended to perform higher quality studies for assessing the effectiveness of interventions in this field.

Availability of data and materials

All supporting data is available through the corresponding author.

Change history

References

  1. Mortazavi H, Pakniyat A, Ganji R, Armat M, Tabatabaeichehr M, Saadati H. The Effect of self-management education program on disability of elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis referring to elderly care clinic of Imam Reza (AS) Treatment Center in Shiraz, 2015–2106. J North Khorasan University Medic Scie. 2017;8(3):461–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Emamimoghaddam Z, Khosh RRE, Ildarabadi E, Behnam VM. Quality of life in hypertention elderly patients that referred to health centers in Mashhad. J Sabzevar University Medic Scie. 2015;22(2):444–52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. . WHO. Oral Health. Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/diseaseprevention/oral-health# (accessed on 11 November 2021). 2021.

  4. Hosseini A, Mjdy A, Hassani G. Investigating the role of social support on the quality of life of the elderly in Mashhad in 2014. J Gerontol. 2016;1(2):10–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Lancker A, Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A, Vanderwee K, Goossens J, Beeckman D. The association between malnutrition and oral health status in elderly in long-term care facilities: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(12):1568–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dahl K, Wang N, Holst D, Öhrn K. Oral health-related quality of life among adults 68–77 years old in Nord-Trøndelag. Norway Int J Dental Hygiene. 2011;9(1):87–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho EP, Hwang SJ, Clovis JB, Lee TY, Paik DI, Hwang YS. Enhancing the quality of life in elderly women through a programme to improve the condition of salivary hypofunction. Gerodontology. 2012;29(2):e972–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glazar I, Urek M, Brumini G, Pezelj-Ribaric S. Oral sensorial complaints, salivary flow rate and mucosal lesions in the institutionalized elderly. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(2):93–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sischo L, Broder H. Oral health-related quality of life: what, why, how, and future implications. J Dent Res. 2011;90(11):1264–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Khanemasjedi M, Araban M, Mohamadinia M. Relationship between malocclusion and oral health-related quality of life among high school students. J Educ Commun Health. 2018;5(1):27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Inglehart MR, Bagramian R, editors. Oral health-related quality of life. Batavia: Quintessence Pub.; 2002.

  12. Schimmel M, Leemann B, Christou P, Kiliaridis S, Schnider A, Herrmann FR, et al. Oral health-related quality of life in hospitalised stroke patients. Gerodontology. 2011;28(1):3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clum G, Gustat J, O’Malley K, Begalieva M, Luckett B, Rice J, et al. Factors influencing consumption of fruits and vegetables in older adults in new Orleans, Louisiana. J Nutr Health Aging. 2016;20(7):678–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Lima Saintrain MV, Gonçalves RD. Salivary tests associated with elderly people’s oral health. Gerodontology. 2013;30(2):91–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kossioni AE, Dontas AS. The stomatognathic system in the elderly Useful information for the medical practitioner. Clinic Interventions Aging. 2007;2(4):591.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bekiroglu N, Çiftçi A, Bayraktar K, Yavuz A, Kargul B. Oral complaints of denture-wearing elderly people living in two nursing homes in Istanbul. Turk Oral Health Dental Manag. 2012;11(3):107–15.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nakre PD, Harikiran AG. Effectiveness of oral health education programs: A systematic review. J Int Soc Preventive Commun Dentistry. 2013;3(2):103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang TF, Huang CM, Chou C, Yu S. Effect of oral health education programs for caregivers on oral hygiene of the elderly: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(6):1090–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nursing. 2004;1(3):176–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measur. 1960;20(1):37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Keyong E, Thitasomakul S, Tianviwat S. Effectiveness of an oral health promotion program for the Elderly in Khiri Mat District, Sukhothai province: a randomized control trial. J Int Soc Preventive Commun Dentistry. 2019;9(3):225–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ki JY, Jo SR, Cho KS, Park JE, Cho JW, Jang JH. Effect of oral health education using a mobile app (OHEMA) on the oral health and swallowing-related quality of life in community-based integrated care of the elderly: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(21):11679.

  25. Lee K, Choi Y, Jung E. Effectiveness of an oral health education programme using a mobile application for older adults: A randomised clinical trial. Gerodontology. 2021;40.

  26. Ohara Y, Yoshida N, Kono Y, Hirano H, Yoshida H, Mataki S, et al. Effectiveness of an oral health educational program on community-dwelling older people with xerostomia. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15(4):481–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Powell LV, Persson RE, Kiyak HA, Hujoel PP. Caries Prevention in a Community–Dwelling Older Population. Caries Res. 1999;33(5):333-9.

  28. Saengtipbovorn S, Taneepanichskul S. Effectiveness of lifestyle change plus dental care program in improving glycemic and periodontal status in aging patients with diabetes: a cluster, randomized, controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2015;86(4):507–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schou L, Wight C, Clemson N, Douglas S, Clark C. Oral health promotion for institutionalised elderly. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1989;17(1):2–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shokouhi E, Mohamadian H, Babadi F, Cheraghian B, Araban M. Improvement in oral health related quality of life among the elderly: a randomized controlled trial. BioPsychoSocial medicine. 2019;13(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tellez M, Myers Virtue S, Neckritz S, Lim S, Bhoopathi V, Hernandez M, et al. Randomised clinical trial of a motivational interviewing intervention to improve oral health education amongst older adults in Philadelphia: 12-month evaluation of non-clinical outcomes. Gerodontology. 2020;37(3):279–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang W, McGrath C, Lo EC, Li JY. Silver diamine fluoride and education to prevent and arrest root caries among community-dwelling elders. Caries Res. 2013;47(4):284–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee KH, Choi YY, Jung ES. Effectiveness of an oral health education programme for older adults using a workbook. Gerodontology. 2020;37(4):374-82.

  34. Mariño RJ, Marwaha P, Barrow SY. Web-based oral health promotion program for older adults: development and preliminary evaluation. Int J Med Informatics. 2016;91:e9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Saengtipbovorn S, Taneepanichskul S. Effectiveness of lifestyle change plus dental care (LCDC) program on improving glycemic and periodontal status in the elderly with type 2 diabetes. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun KT, Shieh TM, Hsia SM, Ningrum V, Lin XY, Shih YH. Easy to read health education material improves oral health literacy of older adults in rural community-based care centers: a quasi-experimental study. Healthcare. 2021;9(11):1465.

  37. Frenkel H, Harvey I, Needs K. Oral health care education and its effect on caregivers’ knowledge and attitudes: a randomised controlled trial. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002;30(2):91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Frenkel H, Harvey I, Newcombe RG. Improving oral health in institutionalised elderly people by educating caregivers: a randomised controlled trial. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001;29(4):289–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Khanagar S, Kumar A, Rajanna V, Badiyani BK, Jathanna VR, Kini PV. Oral health care education and its effect on caregivers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices: A randomized controlled trial. J Int Soc Preventive Commun Dentistry. 2014;4(2):122–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Khanagar S, Naganandini S, Tuteja JS, Naik S, Satish G, Divya KT. Improving oral hygiene in institutionalised elderly by educating their caretakers in Bangalore City, India: a randomised CONTROL trial. Canadian Geriatrics J : CGJ. 2015;18(3):136–43.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. MacEntee MI, Wyatt CC, Beattie BL, Paterson B, Levy-Milne R, McCandless L, et al. Provision of mouth-care in long-term care facilities: an educational trial. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35(1):25–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Schwindling FS, Krisam J, Hassel AJ, Rammelsberg P, Zenthöfer A. Long‐term success of oral health intervention among care-dependent institutionalized seniors: Findings from a controlled clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018;46(2):109–17.

  43. Seleskog B, Lindqvist L, Wårdh I, Engström A, von Bültzingslöwen I. Theoretical and hands‐on guidance from dental hygienists promotes good oral health in elderly people living in nursing homes, a pilot study. Int J Dent Hyg. 2018;16(4):476–83.

  44. Nicol R, Petrina Sweeney M, McHugh S, Bagg J. Effectiveness of health care worker training on the oral health of elderly residents of nursing homes. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005;33(2):115–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Paulsson G, Fridlund B, Holmén A, Nederfors T. Evaluation of an oral health education program for nursing personnel in special housing facilities for the elderly. Special Care Dentistry : Official Public American Assoc Hospital Dentists, Academy Dentistry Handicapped, American Soc Geriatric Dentistry. 1998;18(6):234–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sharma M. Theoretical foundations of health education and health promotion. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2017.

  47. Norman GJ, Zabinski MF, Adams MA, Rosenberg DE, Yaroch AL, Atienza AA. A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(4):336–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav : Official Publication Soc Public Health Educ. 2004;31(2):143–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jockusch J, Hopfenmüller W, Nitschke I. Influence of cognitive impairment and dementia on oral health and the utilization of dental services : Findings of the Oral Health, Bite force and Dementia Study (OrBiD). BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):399.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Estrada S, Arancibia M, Stojanova J, Papuzinski C. General concepts in biostatistics and clinical epidemiology: Experimental studies with randomized clinical trial design. Medwave. 2020;20(3):e7869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL, Reboussin DM, Granger CB, Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL, Reboussin DM, Granger CB. Introduction to clinical trials. Fundamentals of clinical trials. 2015:1–23.

  52. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Deshpande AD, Grillespie KN. Evidence -based public health. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 149–75.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57(4):660–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Michie S, Prestwich A. Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychology: Official J Division Health Psychology, American Psycholog Assoc. 2010;29(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. Wiley; 2008.

  56. Papi S, Sahaf R, Rassafiani M, Foroughan M, Mohammadi F, Araban M, et al. Investigating the effect of different educational methods in preventing disease in elderly people: review of interventional studies in Iran. Int Electron J Med. 2018;7(2):48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Basakha M, Mohaqeqi Kamal SH, Pashazadeh H. Acceptance of information and communication technology by the elderly people living in Tehran. Iranian J Ageing. 2019;13(5):550–63.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. (4th edition). New York: Simon and Schuster; 2010.

  59. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 1975.

  60. Ng C-H. Motivation among older adults in learning computing technologies: a grounded model. Educ Gerontol. 2007;34(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Marsh PD. Microbiological aspects of the chemical control of plaque and gingivitis. J Dent Res. 1992;71(7):1431–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Stuart LF. The history of oral hygiene products: how far have we come in 6000 years. Periodontology. 2000. 1997;15(1):7–14.

  63. Simons D, Brailsford S, Kidd EA, Beighton D. The effect of chlorhexidine acetate/xylitol chewing gum on the plaque and gingival indices of elderly occupants in residential homes. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;28(11):1010–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Sheen S, Pontefract H, Moran J. The benefits of toothpaste–real or imagined? The effectiveness of toothpaste in the control of plaque, gingivitis, periodontitis, calculus and oral malodour. Dent Update. 2001;28(3):144–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Newman MG, Takei H, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Newman and Carranza's Clinical Periodontology E-Book. New York: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018.

  66. Binney A, Addy M, McKeown S, Everatt L. The effect of a commercially available triclosan-containing toothpaste compared to a sodium-fluoride-containing toothpaste and a chlorhexidine rinse on 4-day plaque regrowth. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22(11):830–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Mengel R, Wissing E, Schmitz-Habben A, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Comparative study of plaque and gingivitis prevention by AmF/SnF2 and NaF A clinical and microbiological 9-month study. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23(4):372–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Ruiz Núñez MDR, da Luz RM, Goulart Castro R. Schaefer Ferreira de Mello AL. Dental Plaque Control Strategies Elderly Population: A Scoping Review. 2022;20(1):167–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Vice-chancellor for Research and Technology of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences for financial support.

Funding

This study was financially supported by Vice-chancellor for Research and Technology of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (No. 140110138639).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Autism Spectrum Disorders Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Saeid Bashirian

  2. Department of Community Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Sahar Khoshravesh

  3. Chronic Diseases (Home Care) Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Sahar Khoshravesh

  4. Cancer Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Erfan Ayubi

  5. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Erfan Ayubi, Akram Karimi-Shahanjarini & Parshang Faghih Solaymani

  6. Department of Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Samane Shirahmadi

Authors
  1. Saeid Bashirian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sahar Khoshravesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erfan Ayubi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akram Karimi-Shahanjarini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Samane Shirahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Parshang Faghih Solaymani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study design: SB, EA, AK-S, SS, PFS, Data acquisition, analysis and interpretation: SK, EA, SS, PFS, Writing of the first draft: SB, EA, AK-S, SS, PFS, Revising first draft for important intellectual content: SK, AK-S, SS, PFS, All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parshang Faghih Solaymani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (No. IR.UMSHA.REC.1401.829).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: the affiliation details for the 3rd, 4th and 6th author were incorrect.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

The search strategy for PubMed/Medline.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bashirian, S., Khoshravesh, S., Ayubi, E. et al. The impact of health education interventions on oral health promotion among older people: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 23, 548 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04259-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04259-5

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us