Skip to main content
Download PDF

Modifiable factors associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation in older patients with hip fracture in an orthogeriatric care pathway: a nested case–control study

BMC Geriatrics volume 22, Article number: 845 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Few data are available regarding post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) in non-cardiothoracic surgery, particularly orthopedic surgery. Hence, given the frequent incidence of POAF after surgery and its marked impact, we need to identify modifiable factors associated with POAF after hip fracture surgery in older patients.

Methods

We conducted a nested case–control study in the unit for perioperative geriatric care of an academic hospital in Paris from July 1, 2009 to December 31, 2019, enrolling all consecutive patients aged ≥ 70 years with hip fracture surgery and no history of permanent AF before admission (retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data). Patients with and without POAF were matched 1:5 on 5 baseline characteristics (age, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, cardiac failure).

Results

Of the 757 patients included, 384 were matched, and 64 had POAF. The incidence of POAF was 8.5%. The mean age was 86 ± 6 years, 298 (78%) patients were female, and the median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 6 (interquartile range 4–8). The median time from surgery to the occurrence of POAF was 2 days (1–4). On multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis (matched cohort), the modifiable factors present at admission associated with POAF were time to surgery > 48 h (odds ratio [OR] = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [1.01–2.81]) and > 2 units of packed red blood cells (OR = 3.94, [1.50–10.03]).

Conclusions

This study provides new information about POAF in older patients with hip fracture surgery, a surgical emergency whose complexity requires multidisciplinary care.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hip fracture, with the total number of cases increasing in line with the ageing population, is a major public health concern associated with poor vital and functional outcomes [1,2,3]. In parallel, atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in adults, is particularly common in older patients [4], reaching 10% in patients over 80 years of age [5]. An increase in the number of surgical populations among older people over the last decade has increased the overall prevalence of postoperative AF (POAF), defined as new-onset AF in the immediate postoperative period: 20% to 50% of patients after cardiac surgery and 10% to 30% after non-cardiac thoracic surgery [4].

Postoperative AF, whose usual peak of incidence is between day 2 and 4 postoperatively [6], is associated with numerous complications such as cardioembolic stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and acute heart failure, with an impact on in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay and medical health costs [4, 7,8,9]. Several studies, largely focused on POAF after cardiothoracic surgery, identified factors associated with POAF including baseline characteristics (age, male sex, hypertension, chronic heart failure, ischemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease), and perioperative and postoperative complications (hypovolemia, electrolyte disorders, hypoxemia) [4, 6, 9,10,11,12]. However, few data are available regarding POAF after non-cardiothoracic surgery, particularly emergent orthopedic surgery [4, 13].

Hence, given the frequent incidence of POAF after surgery and its marked impact, we need to identify factors, particularly modifiable factors, associated with POAF after orthopedic surgery. We previously demonstrated that optimizing patient care by improving the management of peri-operative factors and thus decreasing postoperative complications could reduce by a maximum of one quarter the 6-month mortality rate after hip fracture [14]. Identifying the modifiable factors associated with the occurrence of POAF in a population with multimorbidity and polypharmacy would be an essential step that could indicate the future directions for care improvement.

Our primary objective was to identify the modifiable factors associated with the occurrence of POAF in older patients with hip fracture surgery in a dedicated orthogeriatric pathway.

Material and methods

The database was declared to the French National Commission on Computing and Liberty (CNIL) of the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) for this study (no. 20190822165316). This report follows the STROBE recommendations (Additional file 1) [15].

Study design, study setting and eligibility criteria

A nested case–control study was conducted in the unit for perioperative geriatric care of the Pitié Salpêtriere hospital, a university hospital of the greater Paris University Hospitals Group (Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, AP-HP). The unit for perioperative geriatric care is part of a dedicated orthogeriatric care pathway including coordination between the department of emergency medicine and surgery, department of anaesthesiology and critical care, department of orthopaedic surgery and department of rehabilitation. This dedicated orthogeriatric care pathway is defined as 1) an early alert from the emergency department (ED), 2) considering hip fracture as requiring surgery as soon as feasible (i.e., 24 h/day), 3) rapid transfer to the unit for perioperative geriatric care after surgery, and 4) rapid transfer of stable patients to a dedicated rehabilitation unit [16, 17].

The management strategy in this unit for perioperative geriatric care, previously described [16], focused on early mobilization with the aim of chair-sitting and walking within 24 and 48 h after arrival, respectively; pain management; the provision of air-filled mattresses for patients with pressure sores or at high risk of pressure sores; swallowing disorders detected using a systematic medical survey; detection of stool impaction and urinary retention using bedside ultrasonography; correction of anemia with transfusion of packed red blood cells (haemoglobin level threshold ≤ 10 g/dl from 2009 to 2011 and haemoglobin level threshold ≤ 8 g /dl or symptoms since January 2012) [18]; and detection of delirium, AF and malnutrition. To screen for POAF, electrocardiography was systematically performed on admission to the unit for perioperative geriatric care. Then, electrocardiography was performed in case of tachycardia or irregular rhythm on clinical examination performed at least twice a day or hypotension, dyspnea, malaise, syncope, chest pain, delirium, anemia (haemoglobin level ≤ 8 g/dl) or electrolyte imbalance.

From July 1, 2009 to December 31, 2019, all consecutive patients with hip fracture admitted to the unit for perioperative geriatric care were evaluated for eligibility. Patients were included if they were ≥ 70 years old and their primary presentation was hip fracture (first hospitalization after surgery in the unit for perioperative geriatric care). On average, 150 to 200 patients aged ≥ 70 years old with hip fracture undergo hip surgery annually at Pitié Salpêtriere hospital, 75% of whom will be hospitalized in our unit for perioperative geriatric care. We excluded patients with multiple or metastatic or periprosthetic fractures, a history of permanent AF before admission in the unit for perioperative geriatric care, post-operative supraventricular arrhythmia other than AF; and missing data (missing anesthesia records, missing data from the ED, no electrocardiogram before admission in the unit for perioperative geriatric care). Patients were followed until death or the end of hospitalization in the unit for perioperative geriatric care. Some patients had been included in previous studies [14, 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].

Outcomes

Our main outcome measure was the occurrence of POAF defined as new-onset AF in the immediate period after surgery (until the end of hospitalization in the unit for perioperative geriatric care). The occurrence of POAF was retrospectively adjudicated by 2 geriatricians (AR, PG) who independently reviewed medical charts (kappa = 0.948, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–0.99). In case of disagreement, consensus was reached with a third independent senior expert (JB).

Data collection methods and variables

Since the opening of the unit for perioperative geriatric care in 2009, we have created a dedicated research database that is prospectively implemented by 3 senior geriatricians (JB, JCB, LZ), experts in orthogeriatrics, and that integrates all the data from the orthogeriatric care pathway for each patient.

The following variables were collected prospectively by interviewing patients, their family members or their physicians and pharmacists during the hospital stay and were defined as baseline characteristics before hip fracture: age, sex, home or nursing home living conditions, walking ability, previous medical history including cardiovascular and neurologic diseases, chronic medications, and type of fracture (radiological definition by an orthopedic surgeon).

Co-morbidity severity was assessed with the Charlson Comorbidity Index [26] because the index, among a number of other comorbidity indexes, has been found to predict mortality in this population [20]. Functional status was evaluated with an activities of daily living scale (the Katz ADL index) [27]. Repeated falls was defined as 2 or more falls in the previous year, chronic renal failure as Cockcroft creatinine clearance < 30 ml.min−1, hypokalemia as potassium level < 3.5 mmol/L and anemia as haemoglobin level < 12 g.dL−1 for women and 13 g.dL−1 for men.

During the perioperative period, we prospectively recorded the surgical treatment, the delay and duration of surgery, the anesthetic drugs used and all drugs and transfusions administered from the ED to the unit for perioperative geriatric care. Cardiovascular drugs taken at baseline and their suspension were recorded retrospectively.

After surgery, delays to first sitting and first walking, destination (home or rehabilitation) at discharge from the unit for perioperative geriatric care and length of stay in acute care were recorded. All postoperative complications during the acute care period were prospectively recorded.

Statistical analysis

The study is based on data for all available patients during the study period, and thus no a priori power calculation was conducted. Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range) for continuous variables and number (percentage) for categorical variables. Comparison of quantitative variables involved unpaired Student t test or Mann–Whitney test depending on the normal distribution of data. Normality was assessed by graphical representation of the data distribution. Comparison of categorical variables involved chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

Patients with (cases) and without POAF (controls) were matched 1:5 on 5 baseline characteristics (age, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, cardiac failure). We selected those 5 factors from a literature review [4] and deliberations of a panel of 9 independent experts. This panel included 3 geriatricians, 4 cardiologists and 2 anesthesiologists who were all blinded to the research question at this time and to the other experts’ answers. We asked each expert the following standardized question: “According to you, what are the 9–10 main baseline predisposing factors of POAF among patients of 70 and more undergoing hip fracture surgery?” The 4 most frequently given answers were age (89%), diabetes (89%), hypertension (89%) and coronary artery disease (78%) (Additional file 2). Then, 4 other factors were mentioned with equal frequency: history of paroxysmal AF, chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and valvular disease. We chose to keep chronic heart failure because it was most homogenously proposed by the 3 represented medical specialties and was previously described as a strong predisposing factor in this specific context [11, 28, 29]. This a priori and pragmatic method allows for improving the external validity and efficiency of the results and selecting a restricted number of baseline factors associated with POAF, in order to limit the number of patients excluded from the matching [30].

Then, using the matched dataset, we performed a conditional logistic regression analysis to assess independent modifiable variables present at admission in the unit for perioperative geriatric care that were associated with POAF; adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% CIs were calculated [30]. To avoid overestimation, a conservative approach was used [31, 32]: all variables with P < 0.20 on univariate analyses and all clinically relevant variables were included.

Finally, we performed a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with pre-existing AF before surgery (another definition of POAF).

Statistical analyses were performed with R v 1.4.1717 (package Matchlt). All p-values were two-tailed and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics at baseline

We included 757 patients, and 384 were matched; 64 had POAF (Fig. 1). Excluded patients (n = 607, 45%) had similar characteristics as patients included with one exception: fewer patients excluded had haemoglobin level < 10 g.dL−1 at admission in the unit for perioperative geriatric care (68% vs 74%, p = 0.03) (Additional file 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of participants in the study

Full size image

Baseline characteristics are reported in Table 1 (matched cohort). The mean age was 86 ± 6 years; 298 (78%) patients were female; the median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 6 (IQR 4–8); and 17% were living in a nursing home before the hip fracture.

Table 1 Demographic data and baseline characteristics of older patients with and without postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (matched population)
Full size table

The incidence of POAF was 8.5% in our cohort (Fig. 1), with a median time between hospitalization in our unit and the occurrence of POAF of 2 days (1–4). On univariate analysis (matched cohort), patients with and without POAF did not differ in comorbidities (except for history of paroxysmal AF), autonomy, type of hip fracture or surgery (Table 1). The median time to surgery was 26 h (20–47), and for more patients with than without POAF, the time to surgery was longer than 48 h: 23 (36%) versus 62 (19%) (p = 0.004). The groups did not differ in laboratory values at admission in the unit for perioperative geriatric care (haemoglobin and potassium levels) (Table 1).

Perioperative therapeutics

On univariate analysis (matched cohort), patients with and without POAF did not differ in use of anesthetic drugs or techniques (Table 2). Patients with POAF more frequently received more than 2 units of packed red blood cells in the emergency room or recovery room than patients without POAF: 8 (13%) versus 9 (3%) (p = 0.003) (Table 2). The groups did not differ in cardiovascular drug treatment at baseline, with the exception of flecainide, used more at baseline in the POAF than non-POAF group (Additional file 4).

Table 2 Management, complications and in-hospital outcomes of older patients with and without postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (matched population)
Full size table

Main outcome

On multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis (matched cohort; all variables detailed in Table 3), the modifiable factors associated with POAF, present at admission in the unit for perioperative geriatric care, were time to surgery > 48 h (OR = 1.66 [1.01–2.81]) and transfusion of > 2 units of packed red blood cells in the emergency room or recovery room (OR = 3.94 [1.50–10.03]).

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (matched population)
Full size table

Sensitivity analyses excluding patients with pre-existing AF before surgery revealed that modifiable factors associated with POAF, present at admission, were time to surgery > 48 h (OR = 2.79 [1.33–5.86]) and hypokalemia (OR = 2.50 [1.06–5.87]) but not transfusion of > 2 units of packed red blood cells in the emergency room or recovery room (OR = 3.25 [0.99–10.6]) (Additional file 5).

Post-operative complications

On univariate analysis (matched cohort), stroke, acute heart failure and infection were more frequent in patients with than without POAF (Table 2). In 5 patients with acute heart failure (AHF), the AHF occurred before the discovery of POAF. Also, in 3 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the ACS occurred before the discovery of POAF.

Discussion

This study aimed to identify modifiable factors associated with POAF after hip fracture surgery in a geriatric population receiving treatment in a dedicated orthogeriatric care pathway. The incidence of POAF was 8.5% in our cohort. The occurrence of POAF was associated with time to surgery greater than 48 h, and more than 2 units of packed red blood cells before hospitalization in the unit for perioperative geriatric care.

The reported incidence of POAF after non-thoracic non-cardiac surgery varies widely, from 0.5% to 15%, which reflects the heterogeneity in definitions (inclusion or not of patients with a history of AF), methods used to identify POAF, study populations (geriatric or not) and settings (type of surgeries) [4, 6, 13]. We chose to include in this cohort patients with a history of paroxysmal AF, as for previous cohorts of patients with hip fracture.[10, 11]. In studies by Leibowitz et al.[11] (n = 410, mean age 80 ± 7.8 years) and Rostagno et al. [10] (n = 2922, mean age 83.7 ± 8.2 years), the incidence of newly diagnosed AF among older comorbid patients undergoing hip fracture surgery was 3.7% and 3.6%, respectively. Because the definition of POAF and the populations were similar to our cohort [10, 11], the higher incidence we found in our cohort may have been related to differences in monitoring and screening POAF in this highly specialized environment [14, 16].

We found delayed surgery (usually due to preoperative medical assessment, anticoagulant interruption and access to the operating room [14, 17]) associated with the occurrence of POAF, which agrees with the study of Rostagno et al., finding a time to surgery less than 48 h for 80% of patients in the control group versus 49% in the AF group (p = 0.0001) [10]. In this case, pain, anemia, electrolyte imbalance, therapeutics management and/or infection may be involved [10]. Surgery for a hip fracture should be considered an emergency. A meta-analysis including 191 873 patients found that early hip fracture surgery (cut-off between 24 and 48 h) was associated with significantly reduced risk of death (OR = 0.74 [0.67–0.81]) [33]. Of note, reducing the time to surgery is not included in the European Society of Cardiology recommendations to prevent POAF [4], but our results support the optimization of the perioperative way of care allowing for a short surgical delay.

We also found the occurrence of POAF associated with more than 2 units of packed of red blood cells before hospitalization in the unit for perioperative geriatric care, which may reflect complications of anemia or the transfusion itself [34, 35]. This result was not confirmed by a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with pre-existing AF prior surgery, possibly due to lack of power. Perioperative anemia is a known factor associated with POAF. Anemia may lead to relative ischemia of atrial cells and myocardial conduction tissue, thus altering the cell electric properties and leading to arrhythmias [12, 36]. In addition, anemia, especially acute anemia, produces an intense adrenergic activation that may trigger POAF in predisposed patients [12, 36]. However, in cardiothoracic surgery, there is evidence that packed red blood cell transfusion increases the incidence of POAF [37]. We previously found in our unit that a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with fewer in-hospital cardiovascular complications (including AF, ACS, AHF and stroke) with no significant difference in long-term mortality in older patients with hip fracture [18]. Data are limited on the impact of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy on cardiac injury in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.[38], with no difference between transfusion regimens in the FOCUS study including cardiovascular outcomes [34]. In the ongoing RESULT-Hip trial [39], patients ≥ 60 years undergoing surgery for hip fracture who become anaemic (haemoglobin level < 9 g/dl) are randomly assigned to a liberal transfusion strategy (target haemoglobin level 9–11 g/dl) or restrictive transfusion strategy (target haemoglobin level 7.5–9 g/dl) during their hospitalization. The primary outcome is death or major adverse cardiovascular events, including new arrhythmia, within 30 days of surgery (starting date 2022). This trial should provide relevant answers in a few years.

We found an association between hypokalemia and POAF only in our sensitivity analysis [36], which suggests that POAF may be triggered by different factors depending on the underlying cardiopathy and cardiac vulnerability. In addition, we collected the serum potassium level only on the first day of hospitalization, which could explain why we did not find an association of hypokalemia with POAF occurring later during the hospital stay. We found no association with cardiovascular drug use [4, 6], possibly owing to lack of power.

Our study has several limitations. First, it was an observational study, and causality cannot be demonstrated. Second, it was a retrospective study, and bias due to other procedural changes, which may have influenced the occurrence of POAF during the same time cannot be excluded. Third, many patients had to be excluded because of missing preoperative electrocardiogram results (including missing anesthesia or emergency records) to fully meet the definition (exclusion of permanent AF). However, these patients had the same characteristics as included patients with the exception that they had less aenemia before surgery (potential factor associated with POAF). Fourth, we were unable to collect the minimum haemoglobin value for all patients before their admission in our unit. Transfusion in the emergency room or recovery room, especially > 2 units of packed RBCs, may be a proxy for severe anaemia during this perioperative period. Fifth, patients were not continuously monitored, which may have resulted in an under-diagnosis of the incidence of paroxysmal POAF and misclassification bias. Sixth, because our study was conducted in a highly specialized environment that is associated with reduced mortality and postoperative complications as compared with patients admitted to an orthopaedic department [14, 16], our results may not be extrapolated to other wards.

This study may have significant implications for the care of perioperative patients. The complexity of POAF, in particular in a population with multimorbidity and polypharmacy, requires a multifaceted, holistic, and multidisciplinary approach to the management of AF patients, with active involvement in partnership with geriatricians, surgeons, anesthetists and emergency physicians in an optimized perioperative way of care [4].

Conclusions

Among older patients hospitalized in a dedicated orthogeriatric care pathway for hip fracture surgery, the occurrence of POAF was associated with 2 modifiable factors: time to surgery greater than 48 h and more than 2 units of packed of red blood cells before the hospitalization in the unit for perioperative geriatric care. Further studies are needed to demonstrate a possible causal link between these factors and POAF.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from author Pr Jacques Boddaert on reasonable request (jacques.boddaert@aphp.fr).

Abbreviations

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

POAF:

Postoperative atrial fibrillation

ED:

Emergency department

CNIL:

Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés

APHP:

Assistance publique–hopitaux de Paris

References

  1. Berry SD, Kiel DP, Colón-Emeric C. Hip fractures in older adults in 2019. JAMA. 2019;321:2231–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA. 2009;302:1573–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hannan EL, Magaziner J, Wang JJ, Eastwood EA, Silberzweig SB, Gilbert M, et al. Mortality and locomotion 6 months after hospitalization for hip fracture: risk factors and risk-adjusted hospital outcomes. JAMA. 2001;285:2736–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:373–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285:2370–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dobrev D, Aguilar M, Heijman J, Guichard J-B, Nattel S. Postoperative atrial fibrillation: mechanisms, manifestations and management. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16:417–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Subramaniam B, Shankar P, Shaefi S, Mueller A, O’Gara B, Banner-Goodspeed V, et al. Effect of Intravenous Acetaminophen vs Placebo Combined With Propofol or Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Delirium Among Older Patients Following Cardiac Surgery: The DEXACET Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321:686–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin M-H, Kamel H, Singer DE, Wu Y-L, Lee M, Ovbiagele B. Perioperative/Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Subsequent Stroke and/or Mortality. Stroke. 2019;50:1364–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhave PD, Goldman LE, Vittinghoff E, Maselli J, Auerbach A. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation after major noncardiac surgery. Am Heart J. 2012;164:918–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rostagno C, Cartei A, Rubbieri G, Ceccofiglio A, Polidori G, Curcio M, et al. Postoperative atrial fibrillation is related to a worse outcome in patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. Intern Emerg Med. 2021;16:333–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leibowitz D, Abitbol C, Alcalai R, Rivkin G, Kandel L. Perioperative atrial fibrillation is associated with increased one-year mortality in elderly patients after repair of hip fracture. Int J Cardiol. 2017;227:58–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bessissow A, Khan J, Devereaux PJ, Alvarez-Garcia J, Alonso-Coello P. Postoperative atrial fibrillation in non-cardiac and cardiac surgery: an overview. J Thromb Haemost JTH. 2015;13(Suppl 1):S304-312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Subramani Y, El Tohamy O, Jalali D, Nagappa M, Yang H, Fayad A. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation following Noncardiothoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of Observational Studies. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2021;2021:5527199.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zerah L, Hajage D, Raux M, Cohen-Bittan J, Mézière A, Khiami F, et al. Attributable Mortality of Hip Fracture in Older Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study J. Clin Med. 2020;9:2370.

    Google Scholar 

  15. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boddaert J, Cohen-Bittan J, Khiami F, Le Manach Y, Raux M, Beinis J-Y, et al. Postoperative admission to a dedicated geriatric unit decreases mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e83795.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Boddaert J, Raux M, Khiami F, Riou B. Perioperative management of elderly patients with hip fracture. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:1336–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zerah L, Dourthe L, Cohen-Bittan J, Verny M, Raux M, Mézière A, et al. Retrospective evaluation of a restrictive transfusion strategy in older adults with hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66:1151–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vallet H, Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Villain C, Cohen-Bittan J, Ray P, Epelboin L, et al. Prognostic Value of Serum Procalcitonin After Orthopedic Surgery in the Elderly Population. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72:438–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Boddaert J, Na N, Le Manach Y, Raux M, Cohen-Bittan J, Vallet H, et al. Prediction of postoperative mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture: are specific and geriatric scores better than general scores? Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:952–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vallet H, Breining A, Le Manach Y, Cohen-Bittan J, Mézière A, Raux M, et al. Isolated cardiac troponin rise does not modify the prognosis in elderly patients with hip fracture. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e6169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Magny E, Vallet H, Cohen-Bittan J, Raux M, Meziere A, Verny M, et al. Pressure ulcers are associated with 6-month mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture managed in orthogeriatric care pathway. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12:77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zerah L, Cohen-Bittan J, Raux M, Meziere A, Tourette C, Neri C, et al. Association between Cognitive Status before Surgery and Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture in a Dedicated Orthogeriatric Care Pathway. J Alzheimers Dis JAD. 2017;56:145–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Genet B, Lamy T, Cohen-Bittan J, Glasman P, Verny M, Riou B, et al. Lack of Association Between Perioperative Medication and Postoperative Delirium in Hip Fracture Patients in an Orthogeriatric Care Pathway. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;S1525–8610(21):00857–64.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thietart S, Baque M, Cohen-Bittan J, Raux M, Riou B, Khiami F, et al. Short-term administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in older patients with hip fracture: A cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021;38:1003–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Katz S, Akpom CA. Index of ADL. Med Care. 1976;14(5):116–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta BP, Huddleston JM, Kirkland LL, Huddleston PM, Larson DR, Gullerud RE, et al. Clinical presentation and outcome of perioperative myocardial infarction in the very elderly following hip fracture surgery. J Hosp Med. 2012;7:713–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Khormaee S, Do HT, Mayr Y, Gialdini G, Kamel H, Lyman S, et al. Risk of Ischemic Stroke After Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation in Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:3016–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rose S, Laan MJ van der. Why match? Investigating matched case-control study designs with causal effect estimation. Int J Biostat. 2009;5(1):Article 1. https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1127.

  31. Sun GW, Shook TL, Kay GL. Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:907–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Matchar DB, Reichert TA. Regression models for prognostic prediction: advantages, problems, and suggested solutions. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985;69:1071–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moja L, Piatti A, Pecoraro V, Ricci C, Virgili G, Salanti G, et al. Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 hours have better outcomes. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of over 190,000 patients. PloS One. 2012;7:e46175.

  34. Carson JL, Terrin ML, Noveck H, Sanders DW, Chaitman BR, Rhoads GG, et al. Liberal or restrictive transfusion in high-risk patients after hip surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2453–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Willett LR, Carson JL. Management of postoperative complications: anemia. Clin Geriatr Med. 2014;30:279–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chelazzi C, Villa G, De Gaudio AR. Postoperative atrial fibrillation ISRN Cardiol. 2011;2011: 203179.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sood N, Coleman CI, Kluger J, White CM, Padala A, Baker WL. The association among blood transfusions, white blood cell count, and the frequency of post-cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation: a nested cohort study from the Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Trials I, II, and III. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:22–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Trivella M, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, et al. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;12:CD002042.

  39. Michael Gillies. The impact of REStrictive versUs LIberaL Transfusion strategy on cardiac injury and death in patients undergoing surgery for Hip Fracture (RESULT-Hip). https://www.ed.ac.uk/usher/edinburgh-clinical-trials/our-studies/all-current-studies/result-hip/result-hip-study. Accessed 17 Aug 2022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Guillaume Coutance, Dr Sabine Drevet, Dr Thomas Gilbert, Dr Jules Greze, Dr Romuald Henry, Dr Léopold Oliver, Dr Cyril Sellier, Dr Francesca Santi, Dr Arnaud Savoure for their expertise (9 independent experts for matching).

Funding

This work was supported only by institutional sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de gériatrie, Paris, France

    Pierre Gay, Bastien Genet, Audrey Rouet, Judith Cohen-Bittan, Jacques Boddaert & Lorène Zerah

  2. Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de biochimie, Paris, France

    Rana Alkouri

  3. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre d’Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses (Cimi), Paris, France

    Jacques Boddaert

  4. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France

    Lorène Zerah

Authors
  1. Pierre Gay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bastien Genet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Audrey Rouet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rana Alkouri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Judith Cohen-Bittan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jacques Boddaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lorène Zerah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study concept and design: Boddaert, Zerah, Rouet, Genet, Gay. J Boddaert had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data, B Genet take responsibility for the accuracy of the data analysis. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors. Drafting of the manuscript: Gay, Zerah. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors. Statistical analysis: Genet, Zerah. Study supervision: Zerah, Boddaert, Rouet. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorène Zerah.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The institutional review board of the Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile-de-France VI (Paris, France) approved the study. The database was declared to the French National Commission on Computing and Liberty (CNIL) of the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) for this study (no. 20190822165316).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Pr Boddaert reports personal fees for lectures from Vifor Pharma and Baxter companies outside the submitted work. No other disclosures are reported.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

STROBE Statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cohort studies.

Additional file 2.

Answers of 9 atrial fibrillation experts to the question: “According to you, what are the 9 or 10 main baseline predisposing factors of POAF among patients of 70 and more undergoing HF surgery?”

Additional file 3.

Comparison between included and excluded patients in the perioperative geriatric unit.

Additional file 4.

Cardiovascular drugs before surgery at baseline in patients hospitalized in the perioperative geriatric unit with and without post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF).

Additional file 5.

Sensitivity analysis: exclusion of patient with pre-existing atrial fibrillation prior to surgery.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gay, P., Genet, B., Rouet, A. et al. Modifiable factors associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation in older patients with hip fracture in an orthogeriatric care pathway: a nested case–control study. BMC Geriatr 22, 845 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03556-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03556-9

Keywords

  • Postoperative atrial fibrillation
  • Older patients
  • Hip fracture
  • Orthogeriatric

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us