Skip to main content

Multimorbidity patterns, polypharmacy and their association with liver and kidney abnormalities in people over 65 years of age: a longitudinal study

Abstract

Background

The implementation of individual clinical practice guidelines in patients with multimorbidity often results in polypharmacy. Our aim was to analyse medication use according to longitudinal multimorbidity patterns (MP) and determine during a 5-year period (2012–16) which MP are associated with abnormal liver and kidney function in primary care patients over 65 years of age living in Catalonia.

Methods

Design: Longitudinal study (years 2012 to 2016) based on the electronic health records contained in Information System for Research in Primary Care database of the Catalan Institute of Health (SIDIAP). Variables: age, sex, MP, medication and polypharmacy (drug exposure obtained from the Pharmacy Invoice Registry). Medicines were classified in accordance with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System (ATC). Glomerular filtration rate was used to determine abnormal kidney function, and serum levels of alkaline phosphatase, alanine transaminase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase were used to diagnose abnormal liver function. Statistics: For medication use in MP, we calculated annual mean packages of each drug in each MP, and observed/expected ratios were obtained by dividing mean packages in the cluster by mean packages of the same drug in the overall population. Logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the association between MP at baseline and abnormal kidney and liver function tests during follow up.

Results

Nine hundred sixteen thousand six hundred nineteen patients were included, and 743,827 completed the follow up. We identified one polypharmacy profile per MP, and concluded that the most prescribed drugs in each pattern corresponded to the diseases overrepresented in that specific MP. The median of drugs ranged from 3 (Cluster 1 - Non-Specific) to 8 (Cluster 10 - Multisystem Pattern). Abnormal kidney function was most commonly observed in the Cluster 4 - Cardio-Circulatory and Renal (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.19; Confidence interval [CI] 95% 2.15–2.23) and Cluster 3 - Minority Metabolic Autoimmune-Inflammatory (OR 2.16; CI 95% 2.12–2.20) MP. A higher risk of abnormal liver function was observed in the Cluster 8 - Digestive (OR 3.39; CI 95% 3.30–3.49), and Cluster 4 - Cardio-Circulatory and Renal (OR 1.96; CI 95% 1.91–2.02) MP.

Conclusions

A higher risk of abnormal kidney and liver function was observed in specific MP. The long-term characterisation of MP and polypharmacy illustrates the burden of chronic multimorbidity and polypharmacy in the elderly population.

Peer Review reports

Background

Multimorbidity generally refers to the co-occurrence of multiple chronic medical conditions in a single individual [1]. Globally, multimorbidity is growing into a major concern due to the longer lifespan of the population, the complexity of their health status and its relation to greater use of healthcare services [2, 3]. Additionally, living with multiple chronic diseases is commonly associated with the use of numerous drugs, function decline, lower of quality of life and increased mortality [4, 5].

Generally, prescription in patients with multimorbidity is based on the recommendations of individual disease-specific clinical practice guidelines. This frequently results in polypharmacy [6], commonly defined as the concomitant consumption of 5 or more drugs [7]. Polypharmacy is closely related to drug-drug and drug-disease interactions, therapeutic redundancies and adverse drug reactions that can cause hospital admission, worsen chronic conditions and increase morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly and frail population [8,9,10]. Moreover, many drugs used to treat chronic diseases have a modest benefit at most and an increased risk of adverse reactions in this population.

The dynamic changes in cellular biological processes associated with aging [11] influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drug metabolization [12]. Importantly, the mitochondrial function decline linked to the aging process increases the vulnerability of organs such as heart, lungs, liver and kidney to ischemia/reperfusion injury [13]. Consequently, understanding the link between polypharmacy and specific multimorbidity patterns (MP) and their interrelation with liver and kidney function decline is crucial for the design of strategies that prevent adverse effects of medication among the elderly. Additionally, there is a lack of longitudinal information about the effects of polypharmacy on adverse drug reactions and dynamic cellular changes associated with aging.

The pharmacological management of multimorbidity represents a challenge for health professionals, especially in elderly or frail patients, since it requires a person-centred approach as opposed to treating multiple diseases as independent entities [14]. Few publications address medication use according to MP, and to our knowledge this is the first study which includes long-term data on this issue [15,16,17,18,19].

In another article, we described MP in people over 65 years of age and followed their trajectories during 5 years. We used soft clustering techniques, which enabled us to study MP considering as the unit of analysis the patient plus all their diagnosed chronic diseases. We identified multimorbidity trajectories which were mostly stable [20]. In addition, we observed that nine over ten patterns involved a large number of chronic diseases and drugs. However, that study did not analyse the characteristics and use of medicines associated with MP over time, and their association with liver and kidney function abnormalities.

The main aim of this study was to analyse medication use according to longitudinal MP and characterize them annually in primary care patients over 65 years of age during the 2012–16 period in Catalonia. The secondary aim was to determine which patterns are more likely to present an abnormal liver and kidney function during follow-up.

Methods

Design, setting, and study population

A longitudinal study was carried out in Catalonia (Spain), a Mediterranean region of 7,515,398 inhabitants (2012) [21]. The Spanish National Health Service provides universal coverage, financed mainly by tax revenue. The Catalan Health Institute (CHI) manages 285 primary health care centres (PHCCs) in Catalonia that serve 5,501,784 people, corresponding to the 77.2% of the population [22].

Inclusion criteria were individuals aged 65–99 years on 31 December 2011 that survived until 31st of December 2012 (index date), with at least one PHCC visit during the 5-year study period (2012–2016). No new entries were allowed in the cohort. Attrition was caused by mortality or transfer to another healthcare provider. We included 916,619 people at baseline and 743,827 completed all follow-up (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Longitudinal Flow Chart of study period (Years 2012-2016; N=916,619 people)

Data sources

The Information System for Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP) contains the clinical information from the electronic health records (EHR) of the CHI PHCCs since 2006 [23]. The SIDIAP database includes anonymized longitudinal EHR from primary and secondary care that collect information on demographics, symptoms, diagnoses, prescriptions, socio-economic status and the Pharmacy Invoice Registry .

Variables

All variables were obtained directly from the SIDIAP database [23].

Chronic diseases and multimorbidity

In the SIDIAP, diseases are coded in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD-10). An operational definition of multimorbidity was used, i.e., the presence of two or more chronic diseases, based on the selected 60 groups of chronic diseases determined by the Swedish National study of Aging and Care in Kungsholmen [24], with additional clinical, laboratory and medication related parameters for the assessment of certain conditions.

Death and drop out

Death was measured as the occurrence of this event, regardless of cause. If a person transferred out of the CHI healthcare provider during the study period, they were considered lost to follow-up (drop-outs).

Drugs and polypharmacy

Information on drug exposure was obtained from the Pharmacy Invoice Registry, which includes drugs prescribed by primary care and hospital physicians and subsidized by the national health system. The study included only systemic drugs, and excluded hospital medication, drugs dispensed by hospital pharmacies, drugs not subsidized by public health services and topical medication (e.g. ointments and lotions). Drugs were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System (ATC) [25]. We used the 4th level (Chemical, Pharmacological or Therapeutic subgroup) to facilitate analysis and interpretation. Chronic use was considered when the person used three packages of the drug during each year of the study period. Each drug was coded into a dichotomous variable. Polypharmacy was defined as the concurrent use of 5 or more drugs in the same individual for each year of the study [7].

Kidney function

Kidney function was calculated each follow up year using the four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) creatinine calibrated to isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS10) equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [26]. When one or more eGFR was < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 after the baseline year, we classified it as abnormal kidney function.

Liver function

Liver function was determined each follow up year by analysing serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine transaminase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT). Liver function was considered abnormal when after baseline, at least one of the values was as follows: ALP > 2 × 129 IU/L; ALT> 5 × 41 IU/L (men) or ALT> 5 × 33 IU/L (women); GGT > 61 IU/L [27].

Other variables

Demographic variables analysed at baseline and at the end of study were: age at baseline (years), sex (men, women), socio-economic status (Mortality in Spanish small areas and Socioeconomic and Environmental Inequalities [MEDEA] index); quintiles from least to most deprived) [28] and number of total visits to PHCCs.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize overall information. Participants’ characteristics and prevalence of chronic diseases and medication use were measured at baseline and final year, and during the follow-up period.

MP were identified using two steps: 1) the dataset was pre-processed by applying a mixture of Principal Component Analysis and Multiple Correspondence Analysis (PCAmix). For the grouping of participants, it was assumed that the patient population was initially distributed into a fuzzy set of clusters, corresponding to the different MP [29]; 2) In order to model the temporal evolution of individuals and clusters, the sequential individual observations were assumed to follow a dynamic random process represented by a Hidden Markov Model (HMM). The set of HMM parameters was fitted to the observation data by applying the Baum-Welch algorithm. Afterwards, a validation process was applied in order to obtain the optimal parameters and longitudinal clusters. The best cluster trajectory is computed by maximizing the probability of the observed sequence, conditioned to the best computed model parameters (Viterbi Algorithm). Next, we associated each cluster with a hidden state or MP to characterize it.

The final clusters were defined as MP by the research team based on the clinical significance. We eventually obtained ten MP, and also drop out and mortality clusters. To describe the MP, prevalences of diseases in each cluster were calculated. Observed/expected ratios (O/E-ratios) were obtained by dividing disease prevalence in the cluster by disease prevalence in the overall population. Exclusivity, defined as the proportion of patients with the disease included in the cluster over the total number of patients with the disease, was also calculated. A disease was considered to be part of a MP when the O/E-ratio was ≥2. A more detailed description of the applied machine learning technique can be found elsewhere [30].

Medication use in multimorbidity patterns

To describe chronic medication use in each multimorbidity pattern (MP), we calculated annual mean packages for each drug in each cluster. Next, we defined O/E-ratios, obtained by dividing mean packages in the cluster by mean packages in the overall population. We also defined exclusivity as the number of medication packages included in the cluster over the total number of medication packages. A medication was considered part of a MP when the O/E-ratio was ≥2. As a complementary approach, we also investigated medicines that presented an exclusivity value higher than the percentage frequency of each cluster.

Logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the association between MP at baseline and abnormal kidney and liver function values during follow up. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status (MEDEA variable) and total number of packages in 2012. We used multiple imputation to minimize the selection bias resulting from the presence of missing values for MEDEA (7%). We used multiple imputation by chained equations to obtain seven imputed datasets [31]. The final models were fitted with multiple imputed datasets using Rubin’s rules to combine effect estimates and standard errors to allow for the uncertainty related to missing data.

The analyses were carried out using R version 3.6.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The significance level was set at α = 0.05.

Results

A total of 916,619 people over 65 years of age living in Catalonia were included at baseline (women: 57.8%; mean age: 75.4; standard deviation [SD]: 7.4), 853,085 (93.1%) met multimorbidity criteria, and 487,502 (53.2%) criteria for polypharmacy. At the end of the study period, 743,827 participants had completed follow-up (Fig. 1). The mean number of chronic diseases was 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0–8.0) at baseline and 7 (IQR 5.0–10.0) in the final year, whereas mean number of medicines during follow-up was 5 (IQR baseline 2.0–8.0 and IQR at final year 3.0–8.0). The proportion of patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy was higher at the end of the study period than at baseline (93.1 and 53.3% vs 97.2 and 56.8%, respectively) (Table 1).

Table 1 Variables characterizing each cluster in the study at baseline and at the end of the study (N = 916,619)

The most prevalent invoiced drugs, from highest to lowest, were proton pump inhibitors (PPI), 3-hidroxi-3-metil-glutaril-CoA reductase (HMGCoA-reductase) inhibitors and anilides. During follow-up, the most common drugs remained unchanged, but the prescription had expanded to include more patients (Supplementary File 1).

Ten MP were identified at baseline (see characteristics of each MP in Table 1). Except for Cluster 1 (C1) and Cluster 4 (C4), the number of people included in all clusters increased during the study period. Most people remain in the same cluster during follow up. For all MP, the most common shift is dying. The probability of dying varies significantly depending on which MP the patient was classified.

Characteristics of medication use in relation to multimorbidity patterns

Overall, we observed that overrepresented (O/E-ratio > 2) drugs (measured as mean packages) in each MP were associated with the overrepresented diseases in that same MP. Naturally, these drugs are intended to treat specific chronic diseases overrepresented in their corresponding MP (Supplementary File 2). For example, in:

  • Cluster2 (C2)-Eye Impairment and Mental: The most used drugs at baseline were ophthalmologic beta blockers. It should be noted that more than half of the general population with glaucoma and under treatment with ophthalmic beta blockers are included in this cluster (Exclusivity 50.59 and 48.75% at baseline, respectively).

  • Cluster3 (C3)-Minority Metabolic Autoimmune-Inflammatory: At baseline, the most overrepresented drugs were glucocorticoids, uric acid lowering agents, and Vitamin D and analogues.

  • Cluster4 (C4)-Cardio-Circulatory and Renal: At baseline, people included in this pattern had 17 different drug groups overrepresented, mainly to treat ischemic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, valvular heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias, diabetes, kidney failure and anaemia (Fig. 2).

  • Cluster5 (C5)-Cardio-Circulatory, Mental, Respiratory and Genitourinary: At baseline, people included in this pattern had 20 different drug groups overrepresented: peripheral vasodilators, bronchodilators, drugs for ischemic cardiomyopathy, heart failure, prostate diseases and diabetes.

  • Cluster6 (C6)-Neurological, Digestive and Circulatory: Overrepresentation in this cluster is mostly constituted by patients with Parkinson’s disease and corresponding treatment, mainly dopamine, dopamine derivatives and other medicines used in neurological disorders. These diseases and related medications are practically exclusive to this cluster (more than 90.0% at the beginning of the study).

  • Cluster7 (C7)-Respiratory and Ear: Drugs included in this cluster were glucocorticoids, adrenergics in combination with corticosteroids or other drugs excluding anticholinergics, selective beta-2-adrenoreceptor agonists, anticholinergics, corticosteroids, and antihistamines for systemic use.

  • Cluster8 (C8)-Digestive: The most prescribed medication corresponds to drugs used for the treatment of chronic liver diseases.

  • Cluster9 (C9)-Neurological, Musculoskeletal and Minor: In this group the most overrepresented drugs are anti-inflammatory and analgesics, in agreement with the MP.

  • Cluster10 (C10)-Multisystem: The least common pattern, it has multiple overrepresented disorders from different systems, and the corresponding medications used to treat these disorders.

Fig. 2
figure2

Cardio-Circulatory and Renal patterns in relation with drug prescription

As an example, Fig. 3 represents the evolution during follow up of the O/E-ratio and mean number of medication packages for the ten most used drugs in C4-Cardio-Circulatory and Renal and C5-Cardio-Circulatory, Mental, Respiratory and Genitourinary. In these two MP, both the O/E-ratio and mean number of medication packages increase or remain stable over time.

Fig. 3
figure3

Prevalence and O/E ratio evolution over time for diseases and drugs in Cluster 4 - Cardio Circulatory and Renal and Cluster 5 - Cardio Circulatory, Mental, Respiratory and Genitourinary

Considering C1-Non-Specific as a reference, an increase in abnormal kidney function was observed in the different MP over the study period. The highest proportion of abnormal kidney function was observed in the C4-Cardio-Circulatory and Renal (OR 2.19; CI 95% 2.15–2.23) and C3-Minority Metabolic Autoimmune-Inflammatory MP (OR 2.16; CI 95% 2.12–2.20) (Table 2 and Supplementary file 3). The MP with a higher risk of abnormal liver function were C8-Digestive (OR 3.39; CI 95% 3.30–3.49), followed by C4-Cardio-Circulatory and Renal (OR 1.96; CI 95% 1.91–2.02) (Table 2 and Supplementary File 4).

Table 2 Logistic regression models for Kidney and Liver function by cluster.

Discussion

Key results

This study informs on the use of medication by the elderly population during 5 years of follow up, according to the ten most common MP. Predictably, the most overrepresented drugs in each MP coincide with the most overrepresented disorders in that same MP. Also, the medicines most prescribed in the study population remain unchanged throughout the follow up period. The analysis of polypharmacy based on specific MP and their association with abnormal liver and kidney function has revealed that the patients included in the various MP present high rates of abnormal liver and kidney function when compared to the MP C1-Non-Specific, underlining the need for new safety criteria in these patients [32, 33].

Polypharmacy and their evolution

In C2-Eye Impairment and Mental, the medicines most frequently prescribed correspond to the ocular disorders diagnosed. However, in other groups of diseases of this MP, for instance the Neurotic, stress-related and somatoform diseases, which correspond mainly to cigarette consumption, the pharmacological treatment is not subsidised by the public health system and consequently does not appear in the Pharmacy Invoice Registry.

In C3-Minority Metabolic Autoimmune-Inflammatory, over 50% of diseases are exclusive of this cluster. However, even if the medication is associated with overrepresented conditions, it does not have high exclusivity since these medicines have different authorised indications, for instance glucocorticoids and Vitamin D and analogues, which are even indicated off-label [34, 35].

The MP C4-Cardio-Circulatory and Renal and C5-Cardio-Circulatory, Mental, Respiratory and Genitourinary, illustrate the patients with multimorbidity who are prescribed polypharmacy to treat overrepresented diseases. In addition, some diseases as diabetes that are not overrepresented might need various medicines to control the condition. Moreover, recent intensification of treatments has translated into an increase in drug prescription [36, 37].

In C9-Neurological, Musculoskeletal and Minor, metamizole has replaced traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), probably due to emerging safety concerns of NSAIDs regarding the kidney [38], cardiovascular [39, 40], and digestive systems [39].

Abnormal kidney and liver failure function

This study shows that most patients with multimorbidity receiving polypharmacy present abnormal kidney and liver function. While the design of this study cannot explain the causes of the abnormal kidney and liver function observed, we hypothesise that they probably originate from the baseline disorders of the patients, adverse effects from the medication, inappropriate prescribing and lack of adjustment to the kidney and liver function of each patient, which are usually affected by old age [11,12,13, 41,42,43]. This study, based on medication packages dispensed in pharmacies, underlines the importance of stringent monitoring of prescriptions, particularly in patients that might have abnormal kidney and liver function. We recommend the use of prompts in the EHR to adjust medication dosage in accordance with liver function and eGFR.

Abnormal kidney function is highest in patients from MP C4 and C3. In MP C4 -Cardio-Circulatory and Renal, in addition to the baseline kidney and cardiovascular disorders of these patients, abnormal kidney function has been attributed to the hemodynamic effects of diuretics causing nephrotoxicity [41]. The MP C3-Minority Metabolic Autoimmune-Inflammatory includes patients with hypothyroidism [44] and overrepresentation of allopurinol, both causes of abnormal kidney function.

Abnormal liver function is highest in patients from clusters C8 and C4. The risk is highest in patients in C8 - Digestive, since this pattern represents patients with liver disease. C4- Cardio-Circulatory and Renal has the oldest patients and the highest prescription of vitamin K antagonists, which can cause cholestasis [42].

Comparison with the literature

Most studies on MP use a cross-sectional design. Some publications include longitudinal data, but to our knowledge no data on the association of MP and abnormal kidney and liver function have been published [45].. In the literature, European articles underscore medication for depression and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the elderly [18], which we included in clusters C9 and C5, respectively. In contrast, Japanese authors observe the highest risk of polypharmacy in malignant, digestive and urologic patterns [17]. While we excluded drugs for the treatment of malignancies in our study, we did not observe overrepresentation of drugs for the gastrointestinal system, since they are the type of medication most consumed in the general population, nor for urological diseases, which are highly prevalent in the population over 65 years. Interestingly, in the Japanese study only 25% of patients were over 65 years of age. Ultimately, if we analysed the drugs overrepresented in specific patterns such as the cardiovascular (C4 and C5), these medicines would practically replicate polypharmacy patterns described in other publications [18], i.e., drugs for cardiovascular diseases, for diabetes and for gout. However, our medication patterns included also the treatments for other diseases in MP C4 and C5, for instance anaemia, pain, glaucoma, COPD and benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Strengths and limitations

One of the major strengths of this study is the use of a large, high-quality database that originates from the primary care EHR, which includes a large proportion of the population with multimorbidity and with polypharmacy [23]. Furthermore, we have used a classification for chronic diseases previously validated by a clinically driven methodology, which allows a homogeneous assessment of chronic diseases and polypharmacy in a manageable number of categories, and also the uniform evaluation of chronicity in the European Union [24].

This study also presents some limitations. Firstly, we only considered the medications for which at least three packages during each year of the study period had been dispensed. While this could underestimate some medicines, it is extremely unusual to dispense less than 3 packages per year of drugs treating chronic diseases. Similarly, we excluded the medication for acute conditions, some of which can cause temporary abnormalities in kidney and liver function. Secondly, the SIDIAP only collects information on drugs prescribed by primary care and hospital physicians which are dispensed by community pharmacies. Consequently, our analysis cannot rule out active ingredients included in hospital drug regimes, over-the-counter medicines and para-pharmacy products, which might also impair kidney and liver function. Thirdly and finally, censoring of people who died and people who transferred might have influenced estimations of risk associations in a competing-risk scenario, which was not an objective of this study.

Our research shows that while prescription of polypharmacy might be justified with regard to clinical guidelines, it increases the risk of adverse drug reactions and might negatively affect kidney and liver function. Crucially, the risk of overtreatment, which occurs when the prescribed medications have no clinically significant benefit and when the risk of adverse effects associated with an additional medication outweighs the overall benefit of the treatment, is high in polypharmacy [46, 47].

Conclusions

Polypharmacy is highly prevalent in older adults. The most frequently prescribed medicines were related to MP and their consumption was maintained throughout the follow-up period.

Finally, this study provides real-world data on the evolution of polypharmacy and multimorbidity among older adults and describes the association between polypharmacy and abnormal liver and kidney function in this population.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets are not available, as researchers have signed an agreement with the Information System for the Development of Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP) concerning confidentiality and security of the dataset, which forbids providing data to third parties. The SIDIAP is subject to periodic audits.

Abbreviations

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

ALT:

Alanine transaminase

ATC:

Anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system

C1:

Cluster 1

C2:

Cluster 2

C3:

Cluster 3

C4:

Cluster 4

C5:

Cluster 5

C6:

Cluster 6

C7:

Cluster7

C8:

Cluster 8

C9:

Cluster 9

C10:

Cluster 10

CHI:

Catalan health institute

CI:

Confidence interval

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

eGFR:

Estimate glomerular filtration rate

EHR:

Electronic health records

GGT:

Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase

HMGCoA-reductase :

3-Hidroxi-3-metil-glutaril-CoA reductase

HMM:

Hidden markov model

ICD-10:

International classification of diseases, version 10

IDMS10:

Creatinine calibrated to isotope dilution mass spectrometry

IQR:

Interquartile range

MEDEA:

Mortality in Spanish small areas and socioeconomic and environmental inequalities

MDRD-4:

Four-variable modification of diet in renal disease

MP:

Multimorbidity pattern

NSAIDs:

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

O/E-ratios:

Observed/expected ratios

OR:

Odds ratio

PCAmix:

Principal component analysis and multiple correspondence analysis

PHCCs :

Primary health care centres

PPI:

Proton pump inhibitors

SD:

Standard deviation

SIDIAP:

Information system for research in primary care

References

  1. 1.

    Valderas JM, Starfi B, Sibbald B. Understanding health and health services. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(4):357–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel J-P, et al. The world report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthyageing. Lancet. 2016;387(10033):2145–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Salisbury C, Johnson L, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Montgomery A. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(582):e12–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10(4):430–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Violan C, Foguet-Boreu Q, Flores-Mateo G, Salisbury C, Blom J, Freitag M, et al. Prevalence, determinants and patterns of multimorbidity in primary care: a systematic review of observational studies. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):3–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Guthrie B, Payne K, Alderson P, McMurdo MET, Mercer SW. Adapting clinical guidelines to take account of multimorbidity. BMJ. 2012;345:e6341.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Masnoon N, Shakib S, Kalisch-Ellett L, Caughey GE. What is polypharmacy? systematic review of definitions. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17:230.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tommelein E, Mehuys E, Petrovic M, Somers A, Colin P, Boussery K. Potentially inappropriate prescribing in community-dwelling older people across Europe: a systematic literature review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;71(12):1415–27.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(1):57–65.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hajjar ER, Cafiero AC, Hanlon JT. Polypharmacy in elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007;5(4):345–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ren R, Deng L, Xue Y, Suzuki K, Zhang W, Yu Y, et al. Visualization of aging-associated chromatin alterations with an engineered TALE system. Cell Res. 2017;27(4):483–504.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Corsonello A, Pedone C, Incalzi R. Age-related pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic changes and related risk of adverse drug reactions. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17(6):571–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Poulose N, Raju R. Aging and injury: alterations in cellular energetics and organ function. Aging Dis. 2014;5(2):101–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rankin A, Cadogan CA, Patterson SM, Kerse N, Cardwell CR, Bradley MC, et al. Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9:CD008165.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Prados-Torres A, Calderón-Larrañaga A, Hancco-Saavedra J, Poblador-Plou B, Van Den Akker M. Multimorbidity patterns: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(3):254–66.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Guisado-Clavero M, Violán C, López-Jimenez T, Roso-Llorach A, Pons-Vigués M, Muñoz MA, et al. Medication patterns in older adults with multimorbidity: a cluster analysis of primary care patients. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Aoki T, Yamamoto Y, Ikenoue T, Onishi Y, Fukuhara S. Multimorbidity patterns in relation to polypharmacy and dosage frequency: a nationwide, cross-sectional study in a Japanese population. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3806.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Calderón-Larrañaga A, Gimeno-Feliu LA, González-Rubio F, Poblador-Plou B, Lairla-San José M, Abad-Díez JM, et al. Polypharmacy patterns: Unravelling systematic associations between prescribed medications. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e84967.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kostev K, Jacob L. Multimorbidity and polypharmacy among elderly people followed in general practices in Germany. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;55:66–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Violán C, Fernández-Bertolín S, Guisado-Clavero M, Foguet-Boreu Q, Valderas JM, Vidal J, et al. Longitudinal multimorbidity patterns in elderly population using hidden Markov models: a cohort study of Mediterranean elderly population. Sci Rep.

  21. 21.

    Statistical Institute of Catalonia. Idescat. Statistical Yearbook of Catalonia [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 9]. Available from: http://www.idescat.cat/pub/?id=aec&lang=en.

  22. 22.

    Memòria d’activitats 2012. Institut Català de la Salut [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 Nov 18]. Available from: http://ics.gencat.cat/ca/detall/publicacio/memoria_2012-00007.

  23. 23.

    García-Gil M, Hermosilla E, Prieto-Alhambra D, Fina F, Rosell M, Ramos R, et al. Construction and validation of a scoring system for the selection of high-quality data in a Spanish population primary care database (SIDIAP). Inform Prim Care. 2011;19(3):135–45.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Calderón-Larrañaga A, Vetrano DL, Onder G, Gimeno-Feliu LA, Coscollar-Santaliestra C, Carfí A, et al. Assessing and measuring chronic multimorbidity in the older population: a proposal for its operationalization. J Gerontol - Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72(10):1417–23.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2013. 16th ed. Oslo: 2013. https://www.whocc.no/filearchive/publications/1_2013guidelines.pdf.

  26. 26.

    Elorza-Ricart JM, Tovillas-Morán FJ, Oliveras-Puig A, Galcerán JM, Fina F, Dalfó-Baqué A. Estudio transversal comparativo de las fórmulas CKD-EPI y MDRD-4 a partir de la historia clínica informatizada de Atención Primaria de Barcelona. Hipertens y Riesgo Vasc. 2012;29(4):118–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Forns J, Cainzos-Achirica M, Hellfritzsch M, Morros R, Poblador-Plou B, Hallas J, et al. Validity of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes used to identify acute liver injury: a study in three European data sources. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019;28(7):965–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Domínguez-Berjón MF, Borrell C, Cano-Serral G, Esnaola S, Nolasco A, Pasarín MI, et al. Construcción de un índice de privación a partir de datos censales en grandes ciudades españolas (Proyecto MEDEA). Gac Sanit. 2008;22(3):179–87.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bezdek JC. Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. 1st ed. New York. Springer: Plenum Press; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Rabinier LR. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc IEEE. 1989;77(2):257–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011;30(4):377–99.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Duerden M, Avery T, Payne R. Polypharmacy and medicines optimisation making it safe and sound [internet]. London: The King’s Fund; 2013. Available from: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/polypharmacy-and-medicines-optimisation-kingsfund-nov13.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cooper JA, Cadogan CA, Patterson SM, Kerse N, Bradley MC, Ryan C, et al. Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy in older people: a Cochrane systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e009235.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Morgan DJ, Dhruva SS, Coon ER, Wright SM, Korenstein D. 2018 update on medical overuse. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(2):240–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Woodford HJ, Barrett S, Pattman S. Vitamin D: too much testing and treating? Clin Med (Northfield Il). 2018;18(3):196–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mata-Cases M, Franch-Nadal J, Real J, Mauricio D. Glycaemic control and antidiabetic treatment trends in primary care centres in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus during 2007-2013 in Catalonia: a population-based study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(10):4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lipska KJ, Yao X, Herrin J, McCoy RG, Ross JS, Steinman MA, et al. Trends in drug utilization, glycemic control, and rates of severe hypoglycemia, 2006-2013. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(4):468–75.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Dreischulte T, Morales DR, Bell S, Guthrie B. Combined use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with diuretics and/or renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in the community increases the risk of acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2015;88(2):396–403.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Baigent C, Bhala N, Emberson J, Merhi A, Abramson S, Arber N, et al. Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2013;382:769–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Arfè A, Scotti L, Varas-Lorenzo C, Nicotra F, Zambon A, Kollhorst B, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of heart failure in four European countries: nested case-control study. BMJ. 2016;354:i4857.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bosch JA, Calbé JJ, Calero F, Díaz JM, Diego L, Esmatjes E, et al. Pautes per a l’harmonització del tractament farmacològic de la malalƽa renal crònica. Barcelona: Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya (AQuAS). Departament de Salut. Generalitat de Catalunya; 2016.

  42. 42.

    Morales ML, Vélez LN, Muñoz M. OG. Hepatotoxicidad: Patrón colestásico inducido por fármacos. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol. 2016;31(1):36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Tejada F. Hepatotoxicidad por farmacos. Rev Clínica Med Fam. 2010;3(3):177–91.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Iglesias P, Díez JJ. Thyroid dysfunction and kidney disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160(4):503–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Morin L, Johnell K, Laroche ML, Fastbom J, Wastesson JW. The epidemiology of polypharmacy in older adults: register-based prospective cohort study. Clin Epidemiol. 2018;10:289–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Brownlee S, Chalkidou K, Doust J, Elshaug AG, Glasziou P, Heath I, et al. Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world. Lancet. 2017;390:156–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Benetos A, Rossignol P, Cherubini A, Joly L, Grodzicki T, Rajkumar C, et al. Polypharmacy in the aging patient: Management of Hypertension in octogenarians. J Am Med Assoc. 2015;314(2):170–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Catalan Institute of Health and the SIDIAP, which provided the database for the study. The authors are also grateful to Carmen Ibáñez for the administrative work.

Funding

This work was supported by a research grant from the the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, under the auspices of the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, awarded in the 2016 call under the Health Strategy Action 2013–2016, within the National Research Program oriented to Societal Challenges, within the Technical, Scientific and Innovation Research National Plan 2013–2016 ‘[grant number PI16/00639]’, co-funded with European Union ERDF funds (European Regional Development Fund) and the Department of Health of the Catalan Government, in the 2017 call that awarded subsidies for the Strategic Plan for Research in Health (Pla Estratègic de Recerca i Innovació en Salut, PERIS) 2016–2020, modality research oriented to Primary care ‘[grant number SLT002/16/00058]’ and by the Catalan Government ‘[grant number AGAUR 2017 SGR 578].

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design of the study, revised the article and approved the final version. CV, ARL, MGC, EA and SFB obtained the funding. CV, MGC, QFB, ARL, AT, MPV and NVV drafted the article. NV, AT, MG, AR, CV and SFB proposed the methodology, programmed the tests, and contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. NV, CV, MGC, and MCB wrote the first draft of the manuscript. NV, AT, ARL and SFB wrote the first draft of the supplementary file, and all authors contributed ideas, interpreted the findings and reviewed rough drafts of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Albert Roso-Llorach or Concepción Violán.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol of the study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol) (P16/151). All data were anonymized in agreement with national and international law.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could have influenced the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Prevalence of Top 30 Drugs during the follow up period in people over 65 years in Catalonia.

Additional file 2.

Multimorbidity patterns with Hidden Markov models at baseline (year 2012) and final year (2016) of the study. Drug use

Additional file 3.

 Evolution of kidney function during follow up by clusters.

Additional file 4.

 Evolution of liver function during follow up by clusters.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Villén, N., Guisado-Clavero, M., Fernández-Bertolín, S. et al. Multimorbidity patterns, polypharmacy and their association with liver and kidney abnormalities in people over 65 years of age: a longitudinal study. BMC Geriatr 20, 206 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01580-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Multimorbidity
  • Epidemiology
  • Polypharmacy
  • Primary health care
  • Ageing
  • Longitudinal study