Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The role of concern about falling on stepping performance during complex activities

BMC Geriatrics volume 19, Article number: 333 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There is limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms explaining the role of concern about falling on fall risk in older people. Anxiety is known to interact with cognitive resources and, as people get older, they require more cognitive resources to maintain balance. This might affect an individual’s ability to perform cognitive-motor tasks concurrently. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a visuospatial dual-task on stepping performance in older people with and without concern about falling and the impact of repeating this task in those with high concern about falling.

Methods

Three-hundred-eight community-dwelling older people, aged 70 to 90 years old, participated in the study. Participants were asked to perform a Choice Stepping Reaction Time (CSRT) task in two conditions; once without any other tasks (single task condition), and once while simultaneously performing a visuospatial task (dual-task condition). Participants were asked to rate their levels of concern and confidence specifically related to each of the 25 stepping trials (before/after). We also measured general concern about falling, affect, and sensorimotor and cognitive functioning.

Results

Total stepping reaction times increased when participants also performed the visuospatial task. The relation between general concern about falling and stepping reaction time, was affected by sensorimotor and executive functioning. Generalised linear mixed models showed that the group with moderate to high levels of general concern about falling had slower total stepping reaction times than those with lower levels of concern about falling, especially during the dual-task condition. Individuals with greater general concern about falling showed reduced confidence levels about whether they could do the stepping tasks under both conditions. Repeatedly performing the stepping task reduced the immediate task-specific concern about falling levels and increased confidence in all participants.

Conclusions

These findings reveal that people with higher general concern about falling experienced more difficulties during a dual-task condition than people with lower levels of concern. Of further interest, better sensorimotor and cognitive functioning reduced this effect. Graded exposure has potential to reduce concern about falling during fear-evoking activities, especially in conjunction with therapies that improve balance, mood and cognitive function.

Peer Review reports

Background

Concern about falling is common in older people, with prevalence rates up to 43% [1]. Falls can result in injuries which impose limitations upon daily activities, jeopardize autonomy and decrease quality of life [2, 3]. These devastating consequences of falls are possible reasons for the high prevalence of concern about falling in older people who have suffered a fall in the past. However, concern about falling is also reported in individuals without a fall history [4, 5]. A wide range of factors has been associated with concern about falling, many of which are also known risk factors for falls, such as being female, being older and having poor balance and gait [5, 6]. Additionally, impaired cognitive ability [7], depression and anxiety [8] have been associated with concern about falling. History of falls has been found to be a predictor for developing concern about falling [4]. For individuals who have never experienced a fall, concern about falling could develop through forecasting the possible consequences of falls [9].

Concern about falling may have paradoxical effects. High levels of concern about falling are associated with avoidance of daily activities [10]. Such avoidance behaviours can result in physical inactivity, decreased muscle strength and balance, which increase fall risk through deconditioning [11]. Concern about falling can increase fall risk, even in older people who do not have impaired balance or other obvious risk factors [12]. Previous studies have found that individuals with concern about falling often adopt a slow gait speed as a strategy to protect themselves from falling and maintain balance during high-risk activities [13, 14]. People who display such gait behaviour may, however, fall more because a slower gait reduces the individual’s stability and therefore increases the likelihood of falling [14]. Furthermore, concern about falling may also affect a person’s fall risk due to the interplay between anxiety and attention [15]. Anxiety may interfere with tasks that require attention and complex coordination. Therefore, concern about falling may further increase the challenge of tasks such as walking, especially under dual-tasking conditions [16]. As age increases, walking and maintaining posture becomes more cognitively demanding and less automatic [17]. Anxiety might then interfere with this process and increase the challenge to remain upright while walking [18,19,20,21]. There is limited understanding about how to reduce concern about falling. Cognitive behavioural therapy is a psychotherapeutic approach known to be efficacious in the treatment of depression and low mood, with lasting effects that protect against relapse following the end of the treatment [22] and may also be relevant to reduce concern about falling [10]. The aim of cognitive behavioural therapy is to target (erroneous) thoughts and beliefs. Exposure to fear-evoking stimuli has been used as a strategy in cognitive behavioural therapy and may be of particular use in our context. Wetherell et al. (2016) suggested graded exposure to fear-evoking tasks as a treatment for concern about falling. However, this research topic is still in its infancy and not well-understood.

The aims of this study were twofold. First, we explored the effect of cognitive task on the performance of a stepping task in individuals with and without concern about falling. Second, we examined how repeating this stepping task affected task-specific concern about falling - especially in those with higher general levels of concern about falling. We also attempted to investigate whether this relationship was affected by mood or executive function. Our experiment was informed by two theories. Attentional control theory posits that task performance will be worse when individuals cannot efficiently control their internal thoughts and feelings of anxiety [18]. According to the selective exposure theory, individuals tend to favour information that reinforces their anxiety, or information in their environment that is congruent with and confirms their current attitudes [23]. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to apply these theories on dual-task performance in relation to concern about falling. More specifically, this study investigated the performance of older people in a stepping reaction time task, once in a single task condition and once in a dual task condition. We hypothesised that stepping performance during the dual-task condition will be worse in individuals with concern about falling compared to those with lower concern. Additionally, we hypothesised that task-specific concern about falling will be higher during the dual-task condition and will reduce after repeating the stepping task. Finally, due to the interaction between anxiety, depressive symptoms and executive resources, we hypothesised that the relationship between concern about falling and stepping performance will be affected by current mood or executive function.

Methods

Participants

Three hundred eight older adults aged over 70 years old were recruited from a sample of individuals in the eastern Sydney community participating in the first stage of the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study [24]. Participants were excluded if they had (i) a neurological disorder (i.e. dementia, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, motor neuron disease or central nervous system inflammation), (ii) psychological disorder (i.e. psychotic symptoms, lifetime history of severe psychological conditions), (iii) developmental disability, (iv) self-reported inability to walk 20 m without a walking aid or (v) any other medical condition that may prevent them from completing the assessments that were required in the study. The protocol was approved by the Human Studies Ethics Committee HREC 05224 at the University of New South Wales and informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

Experimental procedure

We used the same methodology as previously described by St George et al. [25]. Participants completed a Choice Stepping Reaction Time (CSRT) task under two conditions (with and without a visuospatial task). The CSRT device consisted of a low platform (84 cm × 76 cm) and six rectangular panels (32 cm × 12 cm): two base plates and four stepping plates. The participant stood on the base plates and stepped onto an illuminated stepping plate presented in a random order (Fig. 1). A supra-threshold was applied so that no participants had difficulty detecting the Target stimuli. Participants were instructed to step onto a plate as quickly as possible when it was illuminated, using the left foot only for the plates on their left (front and side) and the right foot only for the two right plates. Participants stood with their feet 12 cm apart and parallel with the two side plates. The light of the illuminated plate turned off when participants had stepped with their full foot. They then moved their foot back to the starting base plate at their own pace. Pressure switches under each plate recorded the time of stepping events to within 1-millisecond accuracy throughout a trial. There was usually between 5 and 10 s delay before the start of a new trial to allow participants to regain their balance. Response time was recorded as the time from the plate illumination to the foot lift-off of the appropriate leg. Transfer time was recorded as the time from the appropriate foot lift-off to foot contact on the correct plate. From the lift-off events recorded by the stepping plates, incorrect start data were obtained. Thus, this method recorded “correct” response and transfer times with any errors made in selecting the appropriate stepping foot included in the response time and any errors made in stepping to the target included in the transfer time. For example, if participants initially raised the incorrect stepping foot and then replaced it before initiating movement with the correct leg, these events increased the response time measure. If participants stepped with the correct leg but did not land on the correct plate and required an additional step to reach the target, this increased the transfer time measure. The total CSRT reaction time in milliseconds was used for all analyses: this comprised the sum of response and transfer times. All trials were included in the analyses, regardless of whether the participant made errors.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Experimental procedure: Panel a shows the Choice Stepping Reaction Time task as a single-task condition, Panel b shows the Choice Stepping Reaction Time task as a dual-task condition while simultaneously performing a visuospatial task

Full size image

The CSRT task was performed either alone (single task condition) and while simultaneously performing a visuospatial task (dual-task condition). The visuospatial task was used because it allowed participants to look directly at the stepping plates of the platform while performing the primary stepping task and provide a record of cognitive task responses– allowing ascertainment of whether or not participants were attending to the secondary task. The visuospatial “star movement” task, adapted from Brooks [26], required participants to envision three boxes side by side labelled A, B, and C (Fig. 1). Participants were then asked to visualise a star in one of boxes and making three movements. They were told the starting box of the star and the direction of the three movements, i.e., left or right. Participants were shown a visual display during the explanation of the protocol. They were allowed sufficient practice without the visual display until they demonstrated that they understood the test requirements and could score 5 consecutive correct responses. For each trial in the dual-task, the experimenter verbally delivered the initial position and three movements of the star and immediately following this, a stepping plate was randomly illuminated. Participants completed the step and then reported the finishing box of the star, i.e., box A, B, or C. Performance was recorded in terms of the number of errors made in identifying the finishing position. We used the same methodology as previously described by St George et al. [25].

The two conditions were administered in a random order with each comprising 25 trials with five illuminations per plate. Each of the 25 CSRT trials for each condition, took 3 to 5 min to complete. To measure the effect of repeating this stepping task 25 times, participants were asked to indicate their levels of confidence to perform the stepping task and task-specific concern about falling 4 times, before and immediately after each condition on a 10-point Likert scale. Participants gave a rating between 1 and 10 (‘1’ represented lowest confidence, or greatest concern: ‘10’ represented highest confidence and least concern). Confidence questions were ‘how confident are/were you that you can/cou the stepping task without making errors?’ The question about task-specific concern about falling read, ‘to what extent are/were you concerned that you will/might lose your balance during the stepping task?’

Other measures of interest

The Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA) [27] was assessed as a measure of sensorimotor function. The PPA is a validated composite measure of fall risk, containing five assessments: visual contrast sensitivity (Melbourne Edge Test), proprioception (measured with a lower limb-matching task), reaction time (measured using a light as stimulus and a finger-press as response), postural sway (path length measured with a sway meter recording displacements of the body at the level of the pelvis while standing on a foam mat with eyes open), and muscle strength (measured isometrically in the dominant leg with participants seated with the hip and knee flexed 90°) [27].

Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) [28] was used to assess general concern about falling. Participants rated their concern about falling during 16 daily activities on a 4-point scale (‘1’ = not at all concerned; ‘4’ = high concern). The sum score may range between 16 and 64. A higher score reflects greater concern about falling. For this study, individuals were categorized using a validated cut-point, based on their levels of general concern about falling: group of low concern (FES-I scores ≤19) and group of moderate to high concern (FES-I scores > 19) [12].

Depressed mood and anxiety were assessed with two questionnaires. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is a 15 item instrument to screen for depression in older people [29]. Scores ranged from 0 to 15 with higher scores representing more depressive symptoms. Anxiety was assessed using the Goldberg Anxiety Scale (GAS) [30]. A high score on this 9-item questionnaire reflected greater anxiety.

Cognitive processing performance was tested with a trail making test (TMT) [31], more specifically as a measure of visual search and executive function including psychomotor speed, set-shifting and working memory. In part A, participants connected letters in ascending order. In part B, they were required to connect alternating letters and numbers in ascending order as quickly as possible. Set-shifting was measured as the difference in completing parts A and B. Maximum completion for part A was set at 180 s and 320 s for part B [32]. The TMT ‘executive function’ score was computed by subtracting Part A from Part B.

Statistical analyses

The statistical software, SPSS Version 24 was used for all analyses and a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Linear regression was used to explore the strength of the association between CSRT performance and FES-I (univariable) and after controlling for PPA, GDS, GAS and TMT (multivariable). TMT measures of cognitive function were controlled for years of education in all analyses. Generalised linear mixed models were used to analyse differences in CSRT performances [1] between single and dual-task conditions, and [2] between people with low and high general concern about falling (FES-I scores ≤19 vs > 19). In addition, interaction effects between condition and groups were also examined. Similar models were used to analyse differences in task-specific confidence and concern about falling over time. Measures of PPA, previous falls, GDS, GAS and TMT were added separately as covariates to the analysis.

Results

The mean age of our participants was 78.0 years (SD = 4.5) and 53% (N = 162) were female. Out of a possible seven common medical conditions, the sample had a mean of 3.1 (SD = 1.5) and 85% (N = 262) rated their health as good, very good, or excellent on a self-rated general health question using a five-point scale. With respect to falls information, 31% (N = 96) of the participants reported one or more falls in the previous year, and 60% (N = 185) reported moderate to high levels of general concern about falling (Table 1).

Table 1 Summary of descriptive data for total sample, participants with lower (FES-I ≤ 19) and higher (FES-I > 19) levels of concern
Full size table

Table 2 shows that FES-I, was significantly associated with average reaction times of the stepping task during both the single task condition and the dual-task condition. In the single task condition, the strength of the association was reduced by 37%, after controlling for PPA; yet both variables stayed significant, suggesting that both have a unique contribution in predicting the performance during the single task condition. In the dual-task condition, the strength of the association was also reduced by 38%, after controlling for PPA. However, only PPA remained significant. When TMT was entered in the model (instead of the PPA), the strength of the association of the FES-I was reduced by 19%; with both variables staying significant, suggesting that both variables have an independent contribution in predicting the performance during the dual-task condition. When GDS and GAS were entered in the model, the strength of the association between FES-I and CSRT was not significantly affected.

Table 2 Results of regression analysis, identifying the strength of associations between FES-I and stepping performance while controlling for PPA, GDS, GAS and TMT
Full size table

Generalised linear mixed models confirmed that the total stepping reaction times were significantly longer during the dual-task condition compared to the single-task condition (β = − 934.4, 95% CI [− 1058.7 to − 810.1], p < 0.001) – see Fig. 2. The group with moderate to high levels of general concern about falling had slower total stepping reaction times than those with lower levels of concern about falling (β = − 294.6, 95% CI [− 480.8 to − 108.4], p = 0.002). The group × condition interaction was significant and indicated that the dual task affected the CSRT task performance more in the group with higher levels of general concern about falling (β = 241.2, 95% CI [70.8 to 411.6], p = 0.006).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Boxplot of average total stepping reaction times for simple and visuospatial CSRT in participants with lower concern about falling and moderate to high concern about falling

Full size image

The effect of repeating the task on task-specific confidence and concern about falling is illustrated in Fig. 3. Analysis of ratings before and after each condition revealed a significant difference in ratings between time (before vs after task) and condition. Participants became more confident (β = − 1.618, 95% CI [− 1.918 to − 1.317], p < 0.001) and less concerned (β = − 0.951, 95% CI [− 1.250 to − 0.652], p < 0.001) after the performance of the stepping task in comparison with before. Overall, participants were also more confident (β = 1.902, 95% CI [1.621 to 2.184], p < 0.001) and expressed lower levels of task-specific concern (β = 0.141, 95% CI [− 0.015 to 0.296], p = 0.076, borderline significance) in the single task condition than in the dual-task condition. Group differences were only found for confidence: the group with higher levels of general concern about falling were less confident regarding both conditions compared to the group with lower levels of concern (β = 0.554, 95% CI [0.135 to 0.972], p = 0.010). The significant time × condition interaction effects for ratings of confidence (β = 0.682, 95% CI [0.338 to 1.025], p < 0.001) and task-specific concern about falling (β = 0.676, 95% CI [0.318 to 1.033], p < 0.001) indicated adjustments towards higher confidence and lower concern about falling were more pronounced after repeated in the dual-task condition in comparison with the single task condition. The group × time interactions were not significant for either confidence (β = − 0.031, 95% CI [− 0.535 to 0.474], p = 0.905) or concern ratings (β = 0.325, 95% CI [− 0.077 to 0.728], p = 0.113). In a further series of exploratory analyses, we explored the role of generic measures of sensorimotor functioning, falls in the past year, cognitive functioning and depressed mood and anxiety on the group × time interaction. Controlling for PPA or previous falls had no impact on this interaction. However, the interaction became significant for task-specific concern about falling (β = 0.392, 95%CI [0.002 to 0.781], p = 0.049) when controlling for GDS; and borderline significant (β = 0.387, 95% CI [− 0.005, 0.778], p = 0.053; β = 0.386, 95% CI [− 0.002, 0.774], p = 0.051) when controlling for GAS and TMT. Further, post-hoc probing analyses [33] suggested that people with high general concern and low mood (GDS > 5) were less likely to adjust their task-specific concern ratings over time. However, caution is required when interpreting these results due to reduced sample sizes.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Responses to questions about feelings of confidence and concern about falling before and after each CSRT condition. Groups are based on FES-I scores. Low concern (FES-I ≤ 19) and high concern (FES-I > 19). Ratings made on a 10-point Likert scale with 1 – lowest confidence, greatest fear and 10 – greatest confidence, least fear. Error bars are presented as Standard Errors of the Mean

Full size image

Discussion

This study investigated the experience and performance during a stepping task under single task and dual-task conditions in older people with low and higher levels of general concerns about falling. The study also explored whether repeating the stepping task improved ratings of task-specific concern and confidence. The results confirmed that participants, overall, were slower during the dual-task condition, but, and of particular interest, the group with higher levels of general concern about falling were more affected in the dual-task condition than the group with low levels of concern. Results indicated that participants overall benefitted from exposure to the stepping task: the task-specific concern about falling diminished over trials. Further exploratory analyses revealed that poorer sensorimotor function and executive function affected the relationship between general concern about falling and the performance of stepping task in the dual task condition. These findings highlight the negative relationship between general concern about falling and stepping ability, especially during complex activities. Improved sensorimotor function and better cognitive function may reduce this impact.

Processes explaining the relation between general concern about falling and performing complex activities

Previous studies have shown that performing dual-task activities becomes more challenging as people get older and a reduced ability to simultaneously perform multiple tasks might subsequently impact risk of falling [14, 34]. Our results showed that participants with higher levels of general concern about falling tended to have slower reaction times when cognitive task requirements increased. This relation was reduced after controlling for sensorimotor function. While this suggests that good physical abilities might be paramount in the relationship, other factors might still be at play. Shackman, Sarinopoulos [21] suggested that anxiety may interfere with visuospatial working memory, which could explain why individuals with higher levels of general concern about falling were slower during the dual-task condition. This further aligns with the attentional control theory, which proposes that anxiety interferes with attention and cognitive resources when task demands increase, possibly negatively impacting task performance [18]. In our exploratory analysis, it was also found that executive function, specifically working memory and cognitive flexibility [35, 36], had an effect on the association between general concern about falling and stepping reaction times in the dual-task condition. The relationship between cognitive function, concern about falling and stepping is consistent with previous studies that showed that poor cognitive ability was associated with both fall risk [37] and the development of concern about falling [7]. This may explain how concern about falling increases fall risk during complex activities. According to the attentional control theory it may be expected that concerns about falling will require some attentional processing during multi-tasking, which may then have detrimental effects on the efficiency of the reactive stepping performance.

Repeated exposure to reduce task-specific concern about falling

Our results indicate that repeated exposure is beneficial to reduce task-specific concern about falling and increase confidence regarding a cognitive-motor task in participants with higher levels of concern about falling. Individuals with greater general concern about falling were less confident about whether they could do the stepping tasks. Initial lack of confidence and task-specific concern were corrected when the same stepping movement was repeated. Exposing older people to activities that they (erroneously) perceive as unsafe may increase their confidence about their ability to conduct the activity without falling, as individual’s predictions become corrected through repeated exposure. These findings are consistent with an earlier study by Rachman et al., which revealed that highly fearful individuals have an increased tendency to over-predict the value of threat [38]. As such, over-prediction of threat has been associated with avoidance of those activities which might evoke a negative outcome [39]. Such avoidance behaviour limits opportunities for individuals to experience situations which counter these irrational fears [38]. As a consequence, people might enter a negative spiral of fear-avoidance and physical deconditioning, further increasing a person’s risk of falling [11]. While our results are the first of their kind, they indicate that exposure might be successful in people with high levels of general concern about falling, but an overall good well-being, regardless of whether they had previous falls or have an increased fall risk due to reduced sensorimotor function.

Clinical and research implications towards reducing the impact of concern about falling on fall risk

In line with previous studies, our results support the role of lowering concern about falling in improving cognitive-motor performance and potentially reduce fall risk in older people [12, 40]. We consider that a holistic approach that incorporates exercise, exposure therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy might be an effective approach to reduce concern about falling long-term. Randomised controlled trials will be required to confirm this hypothesis.

Exercise

The implication of the sensorimotor function affecting the relation between general concern about falling and stepping performance, is that improving physical function should be considered as a strategy. If well-designed, balance exercise programs can reduce falls by 39% as demonstrated by a comprehensive meta-analysis [41]. Exercise and physical activity are also known to improve depressed mood [42] and could improve cognitive performance in older people [43]. A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis showed that exercise can reduce concern about falling immediately following an intervention [44]. Exercise interventions have been proposed as a promising means for the prevention of falls and are recommended in evidence-based guidelines for fall prevention worldwide. However, the long-term effect of exercise on concern about falling is unclear [44], and might require additional strategies.

Graded exposure therapy

Exposure therapy may be effective in reducing short-term, task-specific concern about falling regarding perceived fall-threatening activities. To date, only one study has investigated this approach towards reducing concern about falling. Wetherell, Johnson [45] reported pilot findings showing a combined approach of exercise with exposure therapy was successful in reducing excessive levels of concern about falling. Exposure therapy has been applied successfully to reduce fear of pain and movement [46]. Similar to concern about falling, fear of pain and movement contributes to the maintenance of pain disability, which can lead to avoidance behaviour [46]. Vlaeyen, de Jong [47] implemented graded exposure, during which participants were required to perform fear-evoking activities and was successful at reducing an overall and long-term fear of pain and avoidance behaviour. Therefore, repeated exposures to pain threatening activities without suffering a negative outcome, not only decreased their fear regarding that activity but also translated to other daily activities [48]. This study showed reductions in short-term, task-specific concern about falling immediately after the performing the exposure. Future research should investigate the long-term effectiveness of graded exposure to reduce concern about falling in older people, possibly in combination with other approaches such as exercise and/or cognitive behavioural therapy.

Cognitive Behavioural therapy

When cognitive behavioural therapy is aimed at modifying patterns of thoughts (cognitions) and actions (behaviours) detrimental to fall risk, including avoidance behaviour [10, 49], it can also reduce concern about falling as well as the incidence of fall events [49, 50]. Such approaches might minimize the interference of concern about falling on the capacity to perform tasks requiring attentional resources, through addressing low mood as well as through addressing concern about falling directly. Furthermore, this strategy might be considered in conjunction with exposure therapy, especially in people with concomitant low mood.

Combined cognitive-motor training

The integration of cognitive training into established fall interventions may improve the effectiveness of current programs (e.g., exercise) to reduce fall risk in people with concern about falling. Our finding that executive function affected the relation between concern about falling and cognitive-motor performance, implies that improving working memory and cognitive flexibility [35, 36] could be effective in weakening the association between concern about falling and fall risk in more challenging cognitive-motor situations. Previous studies have observed the association between falls and executive function [15, 51], which suggests cognitive training may also contribute to the reduction of falls directly. Studies which tested the effects of cognitive training found positive results on gait, balance and fall risk [52, 53]. Therefore, cognitive training might reduce falls, in addition to reducing the negative effect of concern about falling on performance during more challenging dual-task conditions. Previous research has also shown a combination of physical and cognitive training can improve executive function [54] and reduce fall risk and concern about falling [55, 56]. A combined training approach might have stronger long-term effects compared to physical or cognitive training alone.

Limitations

First, our sample consisted mainly of healthy older adults, and may therefore not be representative to the general older population. Second, nearly all our measures were self-report. Even though all scales and questionnaires have demonstrated validity in measuring the target outcome, response bias and shared method variance may have affected our findings. Third, the testing of exposure was a secondary objective, and can only be considered as an experimental analogue of exposure [57]. A more specific design to investigate the effects of graded exposure is required. Fourth, although we used an experimental design by manipulating the cognitive load during the stepping task, other relationships were cross-sectional in nature. We should therefore be cautious to infer causality.

Conclusion

The study aimed to gain a better understanding of the association between concern about falling and stepping performance during complex activities. General concern about falling was associated with poorer stepping reaction times, especially when combined with a visuospatial task. Individuals with greater concern about falling tended to have longer reaction times. This association between concern about falling and stepping performance, was strongly influenced by sensorimotor function and executive function. Reduced task-specific confidence observed immediately after the task, was more pronounced in people with higher levels of general concern about falling. Multiple exposures by repetition of the stepping task improved short-term task-specific concern and confidence equally in all participants. These findings suggest that sensorimotor function, mood and executive function may be important for older people with higher levels of general concern about falling to successfully perform more complex cognitive-motor tasks.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CSRT:

Choice Stepping Reaction Time

FES-I:

Falls Efficacy Scale International

GAS:

Goldberg Anxiety Scale

GDS:

Geriatric Depression Scale

PPA:

Physiological Profile Assessment

TMT:

Trail Making Test

References

  1. Lach HW. Incidence and risk factors for developing fear of falling in older adults. Public health nursing (Boston, Mass). 2005;22(1):45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hartholt KA, van Beeck EF, Polinder S, van der Velde N, van Lieshout EMM, Panneman MJM, et al. Societal consequences of falls in the older population: injuries, healthcare costs, and long-term reduced quality of life. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2011;71(3):748–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vellas B, Cayla F, Bocquet H, de Pemille F, Albarede JL. Prospective study of restriction of activity in old people after falls. Age Ageing. 1987;16(3):189–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman SM, Munoz B, West SK, Rubin GS, Fried LP. Falls and fear of falling: which comes first? A longitudinal prediction model suggests strategies for primary and secondary prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(8):1329–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu JY. Fear of falling in robust community-dwelling older people: results of a cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(3–4):393–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheffer AC, Schuurmans MJ, van Dijk N, van der Hooft T, de Rooij SE. Fear of falling: measurement strategy, prevalence, risk factors and consequences among older persons. Age Ageing. 2008;37(1):19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uemura K, Shimada H, Makizako H, Doi T, Tsutsumimoto K, Lee S, et al. Effects of Mild Cognitive Impairment on the Development of Fear of Falling in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(12):1104.e9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gagnon N, Flint AJ, Naglie G, Devins GM. Affective correlates of fear of falling in elderly persons. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;13(1):7–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yardley L, Smith H. A prospective study of the relationship between feared consequences of falling and avoidance of activity in community-living older people. Gerontologist. 2002;42(1):17–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zijlstra GA, Van Haastregt JCM, Van Rossum E, Van Eijk JTM, Yardley L, Kempen GIJM. Interventions to reduce fear of falling in community-living older people: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(4):603–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Delbaere K, Crombez G, Vanderstraeten G, Willems T, Cambier D. Fear-related avoidance of activities, falls and physical frailty. A prospective community-based cohort study. Age Ageing. 2004;33(4):368–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Delbaere K, Close JC, Mikolaizak AS, Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Lord SR. The falls efficacy scale international (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study. Age Ageing. 2010;39(2):210–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reelick MF, van Iersel MB, Kessels RP, Rikkert MG. The influence of fear of falling on gait and balance in older people. Age Ageing. 2009;38(4):435–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Donoghue OA, Cronin H, Savva GM, O'Regan C, Kenny RA. Effects of fear of falling and activity restriction on normal and dual task walking in community dwelling older adults. Gait & Posture. 2013;38(1):120–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anstey KJ, von Sanden C, Luszcz MA. An 8-year prospective study of the relationship between cognitive performance and falling in very old adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(8):1169–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wollesen B, Mattes K, Schulz S, Bischoff LL, Seydell L, Bell JW, et al. Effects of Dual-Task Management and Resistance Training on Gait Performance in Older Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:415.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait & Posture. 2002;16(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eysenck MW, Derakshan N, Santos R, Calvo MG. Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion. 2007;7(2):336–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vytal K, Cornwell B, Arkin N, Grillon C. Describing the interplay between anxiety and cognition: from impaired performance under low cognitive load to reduced anxiety under high load. Psychophysiology. 2012;49(6):842–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Gage WH, Sleik RJ, Polych MA, McKenzie NC, Brown LA. The allocation of attention during locomotion is altered by anxiety. Exp Brain Res. 2003;150(3):385–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shackman AJ, Sarinopoulos I, Maxwell JS, Pizzagalli DA, Lavric A, Davidson RJ. Anxiety selectively disrupts visuospatial working memory. Emotion. 2006;6(1):40–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jayasekara R, Procter N, Harrison J, Skelton K, Hampel S, Draper R, et al. Cognitive behavioural therapy for older adults with depression: a review. J Ment Health. 2015;24(3):168–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance, vol. 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Reppermund S, Kochan NA, Trollor JN, Draper B, et al. The Sydney memory and ageing study (MAS): methodology and baseline medical and neuropsychiatric characteristics of an elderly epidemiological non-demented cohort of Australians aged 70-90 years. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010;22(8):1248–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. St George RJ, Fitzpatrick RC, Rogers MW, Lord SR. Choice stepping response and transfer times: effects of age, fall risk, and secondary tasks. J Gerontol Series A. 2007;62(5):537–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brooks LR. The suppression of visualization by Reading. Q J Exp Psychol. 1967;19(4):289–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lord SR, Menz HB, Tiedemann A. A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention. Phys Ther. 2003;83(3):237–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C, Todd C. Development and initial validation of the falls efficacy scale-international (FES-I). Age Ageing. 2005;34(6):614–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yesavage JA, Sheikh JI. 9/geriatric depression scale (GDS). Clin Gerontol. 1986;5(1–2):165–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldberg D, Bridges K, Duncan-Jones P, Grayson D. Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. BMJ. 1988;297(6653):897–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Reitan RM, Wolfson D. The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery. In: Wedding D, Horton Jr AM, Webster JS, editors. The neuropsychology handbook: behavioral and clinical perspectives. New York, NY, US: Springer Publishing Co; 1986. p. 134–60.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tombaugh TN. Trail making test a and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19(2):203–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Holmbeck GN. Post-hoc probing of significant Moderational and Mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. J Pediatr Psychol. 2002;27(1):87–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Beauchet O, Annweiler C, Dubost V, Allali G, Kressig RW, Bridenbaugh S, et al. Stops walking when talking: a predictor of falls in older adults? Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(7):786–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kortte KB, Horner MD, Windham WK. The trail making test, part B: cognitive flexibility or ability to maintain set? Appl Neuropsychol. 2002;9(2):106–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sanchez-Cubillo I, Perianez JA, Adrover-Roig D, Rodriguez-Sanchez JM, Rios-Lago M, Tirapu J, et al. Construct validity of the trail making test: role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009;15(3):438–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mirelman A, Herman T, Brozgol M, Dorfman M, Sprecher E, Schweiger A, et al. Executive function and falls in older adults: new findings from a five-year prospective study link fall risk to cognition. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e40297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Rachman S. The overprediction of fear: a review. Behav Res Ther. 1994;32(7):683–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cox BJ, Swinson RP. Overprediction of fear in panic disorder with agoraphobia. Behav Res Ther. 1994;32(7):735–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Suzuki M, Ohyama N, Yamada K, Kanamori M. The relationship between fear of falling, activities of daily living and quality of life among elderly individuals. Nurs Health Sci. 2002;4(4):155–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sherrington C, Fairhall NJ, Wallbank GK, Tiedemann A, Michaleff ZA, Howard K, Clemson L, Hopewell S, Lamb SE. Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019;(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012424.pub2.

  42. Singh NA, Stavrinos TM, Scarbek Y, Galambos G, Liber C, Fiatarone Singh MA. A randomized controlled trial of high versus low intensity weight training versus general practitioner care for clinical depression in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(6):768–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brown AK, Liu-Ambrose T, Tate R, Lord SR. The effect of group-based exercise on cognitive performance and mood in seniors residing in intermediate care and self-care retirement facilities: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(8):608–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kendrick D, Kumar A, Carpenter H, Zijlstra G, Skelton DA, Cook JR, Stevens Z, Belcher CM, Haworth D, Gawler SJ, Gage H, Masud T, Bowling A, Pearl M, Morris RW, Iliffe S, Delbaere K. Exercise for reducing fear of falling in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014;(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009848.pub2.

  45. Wetherell JL, Johnson K, Chang D, Ward SR, Bower ES, Merz C, et al. Activity, balance, learning, and exposure (ABLE): a new intervention for fear of falling. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016;31(7):791–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Vlaeyen JW, de Jong J, Geilen M, Heuts PH, van Breukelen G. The treatment of fear of movement/(re) injury in chronic low back pain: further evidence on the effectiveness of exposure in vivo. Clin J Pain. 2002;18(4):251–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vlaeyen JWS, de Jong J, Geilen M, Heuts PHTG, van Breukelen G. Graded exposure in vivo in the treatment of pain-related fear: a replicated single-case experimental design in four patients with chronic low back pain. Behav Res Ther. 2001;39(2):151–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Leeuw M, Goossens ME, van Breukelen GJ, de Jong JR, Heuts PH, Smeets RJ, et al. Exposure in vivo versus operant graded activity in chronic low back pain patients: results of a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2008;138(1):192–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zijlstra GA, Van Haastregt JCM, Ambergen T, Van Rossum E, Van Eijk JTM, Tennstedt SL, et al. Effects of a multicomponent cognitive behavioral group intervention on fear of falling and activity avoidance in community-dwelling older adults: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(11):2020–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Huang T-T, Yang L-H, Liu C-Y. Reducing the fear of falling among community-dwelling elderly adults through cognitive-behavioural strategies and intense tai chi exercise: a randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(5):961–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Herman T, Mirelman A, Giladi N, Schweiger A, Hausdorff JM. Executive control deficits as a prodrome to falls in healthy older adults: a prospective study linking thinking, walking, and falling. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65(10):1086–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Segev-Jacubovski O, Herman T, Yogev-Seligmann G, Mirelman A, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. The interplay between gait, falls and cognition: can cognitive therapy reduce fall risk? Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11(7):1057–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Smith-Ray RL, Hughes SL, Prohaska TR, Little DM, Jurivich DA, Hedeker D. Impact of cognitive training on balance and gait in older adults. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015;70(3):357–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kayama H, Okamoto K, Nishiguchi S, Yamada M, Kuroda T, Aoyama T. Effect of a Kinect-based exercise game on improving executive cognitive performance in community-dwelling elderly: case control study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Barban F, Annicchiarico R, Melideo M, Federici A, Lombardi MG, Giuli S, et al. Reducing Fall Risk with Combined Motor and Cognitive Training in Elderly Fallers. Brain Sciences. 2017;7:19.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Schoene D, Valenzuela T, Toson B, Delbaere K, Severino C, Garcia J, et al. Interactive cognitive-motor step training improves cognitive risk factors of falling in older adults - a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Crombez G, Eccleston C, Vlaeyen JWS, Vansteenwegen D, Lysens R, Eelen P. Exposure to physical movement in low back pain patients: restricted effects of generalization. Health Psychol. 2002;21(6):573–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank participants from the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study for volunteering their time to take part in this study.

Funding

This work was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council, grant 350833, and by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, grant 400941. Prof. Lord and A/Prof Delbaere are currently supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, PO Box 1165, Sydney, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia

    Shaira Viaje, Stephen R. Lord, Jacqueline C. T. Close & Kim Delbaere

  2. Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium

    Geert Crombez

  3. School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Stephen R. Lord & Kim Delbaere

  4. Prince of Wales Clinical School, Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Jacqueline C. T. Close

  5. Neuropsychiatric Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Perminder Sachdev

  6. Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South, Sydney, Wales, Australia

    Perminder Sachdev & Henry Brodaty

  7. Dementia Centre for Research CollaborationUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Perminder Sachdev & Henry Brodaty

Authors
  1. Shaira Viaje
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Geert Crombez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephen R. Lord
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jacqueline C. T. Close
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Perminder Sachdev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Henry Brodaty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kim Delbaere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KD, GC and SRL had the study idea and conducted the methods. KD collected the data and helped with the data analysis. SV did the data analyses and wrote the manuscript with KD. JCT, PS and HB assisted with the interpretation of the results. All authors edited and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Delbaere.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol was approved by the Human Studies Ethics Committee HREC 05224 at the University of New South Wales and informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

KD is a member of the editorial board for BMC Geriatrics. The authors declare that they have no other competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viaje, S., Crombez, G., Lord, S.R. et al. The role of concern about falling on stepping performance during complex activities. BMC Geriatr 19, 333 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1356-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1356-z

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us