Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of regression analysis, identifying the strength of associations between FES-I and stepping performance while controlling for PPA, GDS, GAS and TMT

From: The role of concern about falling on stepping performance during complex activities

 

Single task CSRT

Dual-task CSRT

FES-I#

Covariate†

FES-I#

Covariate†

Concern about falling (FES-I)

6.59 (1.82), p < 0.001

–

18.04 (7.73), p = 0.020

–

Fall risk (PPA)

4.18 (1.74), p = 0.017

79.61 (12.13), p < 0.001

11.48 (7.72), p = 0.138

215.96 (53.68), p < 0.001

Mood (GDS)

5.78 (1.90), p = 0.003

10.54 (6.30), p = 0.095

15.89 (7.74), p = 0.041

43.46 (25.63), p = 0.091

Anxiety (GAS)

6.11 (1.89), p = 0.001)

5.06 (7.07), p = 0.475

18.06 (7.95), p = 0.024

11.56, (29.66), p = 0.697

Executive function (TMT)

6.05 (1.80), p = 0.001

0.72 (0.18), p = 0.313

14.69 (7.44), p = 0.049

3.52 (0.76), p < 0.001

  1. Legend: FES-I=Falls Efficacy Scale, GDS = Geriatric Depression Scale, GAS = Goldberg Anxiety Scale, TMT = Trail Making Task, B = regression weight, SE = Standard Error
  2. # Univariable regression analysis between measures (FES-I, PPA, GDS, GAS, TMT) and stepping performance; † Multivariable linear regression analysis between measures FES-I and stepping performance, controlling for PPA, GDS, GAS or TMT
Back to article page

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us