Skip to main content
Download PDF

Geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability overlap and increase healthcare use among older Chinese

BMC Geriatrics volume 18, Article number: 147 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability are prevalent among ageing population. However, no study empirically examined their additive or synergistic effect on healthcare use. The present study aims to estimate overlapping prevalence of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability; and to examine associations of these three conditions with healthcare use.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in community-dwelling older adults aged 60 and above in 12 Hong Kong districts. Pearson’s chi-squared test for trend was performed to examine prevalence of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability across three age groups (60–69, 70–79, and ≥ 80). Multiple logistic regression was conducted to explore associations of these three conditions with three types of healthcare use (hospital admission, general outpatient clinic and specialist outpatient clinic attendance) respectively.

Results

Among 2618 participants, 75.3, 41.8, and 22.5% had geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability respectively, and 10.4% had all the three conditions. Prevalence of the three conditions and their coexistence significantly increased with age (p for trend < .001). Each condition was independently associated with at least two out of three types of healthcare use. Interestingly, the associations of multimorbidity and disability with specialist outpatient clinic attendance were weakened at older age, while the associations of geriatric syndromes with hospital admission and specialist outpatient clinic attendance were strengthened. Furthermore, the odds of all the three types of healthcare use increased with the number of conditions present (p for trend < .001).

Conclusions

Our findings support that the three conditions overlap and increase healthcare use. Early identification, prevention and intervention targeting older adults living with multiple healthcare needs are necessary.

Peer Review reports

Background

Geriatric syndromes are a range of conditions representing multiple organ impairment in older adults [1]. Unlike traditional chronic diseases, these syndromes cannot fit into discrete disease categories and are loosely defined [1]. However, frailty [2], sarcopenia [3], cognitive impairment [4], and urinary incontinence [5] are widely recognized as common examples of geriatric syndromes.

Geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability are closely interrelated. Multimorbidity, the co-occurrence of two or more chronic diseases, can result in geriatric syndromes [6]. Multimorbidity and geriatric syndromes can further cause disability [6]. For example, heart failure and other morbidities accelerate muscle loss leading to sarcopenia, which further result in rapid functional decline [7]. Due to their close interrelation, some researchers considered disability and multimorbidity as geriatric syndromes [8, 9], whereas others suggested that three conditions overlap but are distinct clinical entities [10]. Nevertheless, both definitions highlight the multiple healthcare needs of older adults.

Geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability are associated with healthcare use. Multimorbidity is traditionally considered as the most important determinant of healthcare use [11], responsible for two-thirds of healthcare cost in America [12]. Hospitalization is strongly associated with severe disability [13]. Geriatric syndromes can predict hospital admission [9, 14]. Furthermore, a review article suggested that these three interrelated conditions may have additive or synergistic effects on healthcare use [10]. In light of the growing healthcare needs of the ageing population, multimorbidity and disability are widely recognized. However, geriatric syndromes are seldom managed in clinical routine [15].

There are knowledge gaps regarding (1) coexistence of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity and disability within same individuals and (2) their respective associations with healthcare use. First, although several studies estimated overlapping prevalence of frailty, multimorbidity, and disability in community-dwelling older adults [10, 16,17,18,19,20], only one was conducted in Chinese population [21]. In addition, no geriatric syndromes other than frailty were included in these studies. Lack of identification of their multiple healthcare needs may delay local prevention and intervention. Second, although previous studies have explored independent associations of the three conditions with healthcare use [14], none examined whether the associations vary with age. More importantly, the additive or synergistic effect of these three conditions on healthcare use has not been examined empirically. Given the interrelation among the three conditions, the poor understanding of their associations with healthcare use may hinder appropriate long-term care management.

Recognizing the significance of but the dearth of research, we conducted a cross-sectional study on community-dwelling older Chinese in Hong Kong to (1) estimate overlapping prevalence of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability; and to (2) examine their associations with healthcare use.

Methods

Study background and subject

This cross-sectional study is a part of baseline well-being assessment of the Jockey Club Community eHealth Care Project, a telecare programme promoting preventive healthcare and self-management. Specifically, the programme consists of (1) data sharing to a nurse team by cloud technology for proactive monitoring and follow-up, (2) regular health measurement with smart cards for recording, and (3) nursing caring call and regular outreach visits by a multi-disciplinary team including nurses, health workers, and social workers. All community-dwelling older adults aged 60 and above were eligible to participate in this telecare programme. We recruited participants in 24 elderly centres located at 12 districts of Hong Kong, between September 2016 and October 2017.

Data collection procedure

Each participant was given a tablet to complete an electronic survey, in a group of 6 to 8. At least one staff member of each elderly centre was trained to lead the groups by going through each question with the participants. Other staff members would further assist the participants with survey completion if necessary. Data collected were automatically uploaded to and stored in the cloud.

Measures

Geriatric syndromes included in this survey were (a) frailty, (b) sarcopenia, (c) mild cognitive impairment, and (d) urinary incontinence. Frailty was measured by the FRAIL scale [22], which consists of five items including fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, and loss of weight. The scores ranged from 0 (best) to 5 (worst), representing frail (3–5), pre-frail (1–2), or robust (0) status. The validated SARC-F scale [23] was adopted for sarcopenia screening. The scale consisted of five components, including strength, assistance with walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs, and fall. The scores ranged from 0 to 10, with 0 to 2 points for each component. Scores ≥ 4 indicated the presence of sarcopenia. Mild cognitive impairment was screened with the validated five-item Abbreviated Memory Inventory for Chinese (AMIC) [24]. The scores ranged from 0 to 5, with 1 point for each item. Scores ≥ 3 indicated the presence of mild cognitive impairment. Older adults with any one of the syndromes were considered as living with geriatric syndrome.

Data regarding the presence of chronic diseases diagnosed by doctors was obtained through participants’ self-report. The chronic diseases included (a) hypertension, (b) diabetes mellitus, (c) hypercholesterolemia, (d) heart disease, (e) stroke, (f) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and (g) renal disease. Multimorbidity was defined as having two or more chronic diseases.

Disability was determined by the validated Chinese-version five-item Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL) adopted from the Lawton IADL scale [25]. The IADL tasks examined include ability to use telephone, shopping, food preparation, transportation, and ability to handle finance. Participants who had difficulty in performing any one of the activities were classified as living with disability.

Participants reported their healthcare use for any causes in the past 12 months, including (a) hospital admission, (b) general outpatient clinic (GOPC) attendance, and (c) specialist outpatient clinic (SOPC) attendance by responding to a “yes” “no” answer.

Sociodemographic variables including age, gender, marital status, education attainment, and living arrangement were recorded.

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics including prevalence of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, disability, and coexistence of these three conditions were computed. Pearson’s chi-squared test for trend was performed to examine trends in the prevalence rates across three age groups (60–69, 70–79, and ≥ 80). Additionally, strength of interrelations among the three conditions was determined by Cramer’s V. A Cramer’s V of < .1 was considered as weak, .1–.3 as moderate, > .3 as strong.

Multiple logistic regression was conducted to explore associations of the three conditions with hospital admission, GOPC attendance, and SOPC attendance in two approaches. First, geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability were included in the multivariate analysis for each of the three types of healthcare use. The analyses were then stratified by the three age groups. Second, associations of number and combination of conditions with the healthcare use were explored. Pearson’s chi-squared test for trend was performed to examine trends in healthcare use over increasing number of conditions. All multivariate analyses were further adjusted for the sociodemographic variables. Cases with missing data of any variables (n = 3) were excluded from the regression analyses.

Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were reported. A p-value of < .05 was considered as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed by IBM SPSS Statistics 24 and weighted for age and gender.

Results

Table 1 presents descriptive statistics of 2618 participants. The majority of them were aged 60–69, female, married, had primary education level and lived with others. Mild cognitive impairment was the most common geriatric syndrome (68.3%). GOPC was the most frequently used healthcare service (83.1%).

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of participant characteristics (n = 2618)
Full size table

Prevalence of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability

Figure 1 is a Venn diagram displaying prevalence of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability. The prevalence were 75.3, 41.8, and 22.5% respectively. Overlapping prevalence of the three conditions was 10.4%. The interrelations within the three conditions were weak-to-moderate (Cramer’s V .026–.219).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Venn diagram displaying prevalence of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability. Cramer’s V: .081 (p < .001) for multimorbidity-disability pair; .026 (p = .178) for multimorbidity-geriatric syndromes pair; .219 (p < .001) for geriatric syndromes-disability pair

Full size image

Figure 2 shows prevalence of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, disability, and coexistence of conditions by age groups. All the three conditions and their coexistence within same individuals increased in prevalence over age (p for trend < .001). Yet, the increasing trend in prevalence of multimorbidity was inconsistent from age group 70–79 to ≥ 80.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, disability, and coexistence of conditions by age groups. All trends in prevalence across age group were significant at p < .001. Coexistence of conditions refers to presence of two or more conditions (geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability) within same participant

Full size image

Associations of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability with healthcare use

Figure 3 demonstrates results of multiple logistic regression of healthcare use on geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability. Each condition was independently associated with hospital admission, GOPC attendance and/or SOPC attendance (AOR 1.25–2.38, 95% CI 1.04–3.02). Stratified by the three age groups, the associations of multimorbidity and disability with SOPC attendance were weakened from age group 60–69 to ≥ 80 (AOR decreased from 2.88 to 1.26 for multimorbidity and from 2.16 to 1.22 for disability). At the same time, the associations of geriatric syndromes with hospital admission and SOPC attendance were strengthened in older age groups (AOR increased from 0.96 to 1.95 for hospital admission and from 1.55 to 2.71 for SOPC attendance).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Multiple logistic regression of healthcare use on geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability. a Hospital admission; b General Outpatient Clinic (GOPC) attendance; c specialist outpatient clinic (SOPC) attendance. Analyses were further adjusted for age, gender, marital status, education, and living arrangement. Reference groups were participants without any conditions

Full size image

Figure 4 presents results of multiple logistic regression of healthcare use on number and combination of conditions. Dose-response relationships between the number of conditions present and all three types of healthcare use were found (AOR 1.17–1.44, 95% CI 0.85–1.89, for one condition; AOR 1.74–3.87, 95% CI 1.26–5.38 for two conditions; AOR 2.44–6.44, 95% CI 1.62–11.42 for three conditions; all p for trend < .001). Specifically, older adults living with geriatric syndromes only (without multimorbidity and disability) had significantly more GOPC and SOPC attendance (AOR 1.38–1.41, 95% CI 1.05–1.87). In contrast, those living with both multimorbidity and disability (without geriatric syndromes) had lower GOPC attendance (AOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15–0.94).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Multiple logistic regression of healthcare use on number and combination of conditions. a Hospital admission; b General Outpatient Clinic (GOPC) attendance; c specialist outpatient clinic (SOPC) attendance. Analyses were further adjusted for age, gender, marital status, education, and living arrangement. Reference groups were participants without any conditions. All trends in healthcare use over increasing number of conditions were significant at p < .001

Full size image

Discussion

Prevalence of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability

In our sample, 75.3, 41.8, and 22.5% had the three conditions respectively, and 10.4% had all the three conditions (Fig. 1). Using similar assessment tools and classifications of the three conditions, a study reveals similar prevalence rates of frailty (10.6%), multimorbidity (46.3%), and disability (25.0%) among Iceland older adults [16]. Meanwhile, the high prevalence of geriatric syndromes found in this study was accounted for by that of mild cognitive impairment (68.3%) diagnosed, much higher than that in other Asian countries such as Japan [26] and Korea [27]. The high prevalence of mild cognitive impairment revealed in our study might be attributed to the relatively low specificity of AMIC (57.4%).

It is notable that geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, disability, and their coexistence increased in prevalence over age (Fig. 2). On the one hand, the increasing prevalence of geriatric syndromes [28], multimorbidity [29], and disablity [30] over age were well-documented. On the other hand, what our study adds is that ageing strengthened the coexistence of the three conditions in community-dwelling older adults.

Furthermore, our study may also provide some insights regarding the definition of geriatric syndromes. The weak-to-moderate associations among geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability (Cramer’s V: .026–.219) supported that the three conditions are different clinical entities but cannot be totally untangled.

Associations of geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability with healthcare use

This is the first study to explore whether associations of the three conditions with healthcare use vary with age and with coexistence of conditions. As expected, this study demonstrates independent associations of the three conditions with higher healthcare use (Fig. 3), in line with previous findings [14]. But interestingly, in our age-stratified analysis, the associations of multimorbidity and disability with SOPC attendance were weakened in older age groups (Fig. 3c). Conversely, the associations of geriatric syndromes with hospital admission and SOPC attendance were strengthened at advanced age (Fig. 3a and c). There were two possible underlying reasons. First, as there was an inconsistent increase in multimorbidity over age observed (Fig. 1), survival bias might play a role in the age-related prevalence of the multimorbidity. Alternatively, instead of attending outpatient clinics, older adults with multimorbidity and/or disability might live in elderly homes to receive care. In Hong Kong, eligible criteria for elderly home admission include advanced age (65 and above), requiring medical care, and disability [31]. Meanwhile, geriatric syndromes are not specified as the admission criteria. Therefore, older adults aged 70 and above with multimorbidity and disability requiring medical care might be underrepresented in our community sample.

Our study also showed dose-response relationships between the number of conditions present and all three types of healthcare use were observed (Fig. 4). The results empirically support additive or synergistic effects of the conditions on healthcare use. Additionally, older adults living with geriatric syndromes only (without multimorbidity and disability) have significantly higher GOPC and SOPC attendance. By contrast, contradicting the notion, those living with multimorbidity and disability (without geriatric syndromes) had lower GOPC attendance. In light of a strong association of the multimorbidity-disability pair with hospital admission (Fig. 4a), older adults living with both multimorbidity and disability might have medical conditions severe enough for direct hospital admission, instead of attending outpatient clinics.

Limitations

Our study has several limitations. First, the findings drawn from community-dwelling older adults might not be generalizable to those living in elderly homes. Second, chronic diseases and geriatric syndromes assessed in this study were limited. The prevalence of the conditions might be underestimated. Third, our results relied on self-reported data, which were subject to recall bias and cognitive impairment in older adults. Fourth, the cross-sectional study design cannot confirm causations but only associations between the conditions and the healthcare use. Fifth, confounders including lifestyle and long-term medications were not adjusted in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Our study reveals that geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability overlapped and increasingly overlapped at advanced age. The three conditions were independently and cumulatively associated with higher inpatient and outpatient use. These findings inform policy making for early identification of multiple healthcare needs of older adults, in order to facilitate early prevention and intervention. Future studies should adopt longitudinal study design and include older adults living in elderly homes. Mechanisms underlying interrelation or hierarchical relation among the three conditions can also be explored. Health service research can examine community screening and clinical management models targeting the older adults living with multiple conditions including geriatric syndromes.

Abbreviations

95% CI:

95% confidence interval

AMIC:

Abbreviated Memory Inventory for Chinese

AOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

GOPC:

General outpatient clinic

IADL:

Instrumental activity of daily living

SOPC:

Specialist outpatient clinic

References

  1. Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, Kuchel GA. Geriatric syndromes: clinical, research and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(5):780–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Xue QL. The frailty syndrome: definition and natural history. Clin Geriatr Med. 2011;27(1):1–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Landi F, Topinkova E, Michel JP. Understanding sarcopenia as a geriatric syndrome. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010;13(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Allain TJ, Mwambelo M, Mdolo T, Mfune P. Falls and other geriatric syndromes in Blantyre, Malawi: a community survey of older adults. Malawi Med J. 2014;26(4):105–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawhorne LW, Ouslander JG, Parmelee PA, Resnick B, Calabrese B. Urinary incontinence: a neglected geriatric syndrome in nursing facilities. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008;9(1):29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li CL, Chiu YC, Chang HY, Hsu KH, Bai YB, Wang HH. Association of geriatric conditions and cardiovascular diseases with disability in older adults with diabetes: findings from a nationally representative survey. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13(3):563–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murad K, Kitzman DW. Frailty and multiple comorbidities in the elderly patient with heart failure: implications for management. Heart Fail Rev. 2012;17(0):581–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kane RL, Shamliyan T, Talley K, Pacala J. The association between geriatric syndromes and survival. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(5):896–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang SY, Shamliyan TA, Talley KMC, Ramakrishnan R, Kane RL. Not just specific diseases: systematic review of the association of geriatric syndromes with hospitalization or nursing home admission. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;57(1):16–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol Ser A. 2004;59(3):M255–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolff JL, Boult C, Boyd C, Anderson G. Newly reported chronic conditions and onset of functional dependency. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(5):851–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chronic care. https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2010/01/chronic-care.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2018.

  13. Gill TM, Allore HG, Gahbauer EA, Murphy TE. Change in disability after hospitalization or restricted activity in older persons. JAMA. 2010;304(17):1919–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang HH, Sheu JT, Shyu YIL, Chang HY, Li CL. Geriatric conditions as predictors of increased number of hospital admissions and hospital bed days over one year: findings of a nationwide cohort of older adults from Taiwan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;59(1):169–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Woo J. Designing fit for purpose health and social services for ageing populations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(5):457.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Aarts S, Patel KV, Garcia ME, Van Den Akker M, Verhey FRJ, Metsemakers JFM, Van Boxtel MPJ, Gudnason V, Jonsdottir MK, Siggeirsdottir K, Jonsson PV, Harris TB, Launer LJ. Co-presence of multimorbidity and disability with frailty: an examination of heterogeneity in the frail older population. J Frailty Aging. 2015;4(3):131–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gale CR, Cooper C, Aihie Sayer A. Prevalence of frailty and disability: findings from the English longitudinal study of ageing. Age Ageing. 2015;44(1):162–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boeckxstaens P, Vaes B, Legrand D, Dalleur O, De Sutter A, Degryse J-M. The relationship of multimorbidity with disability and frailty in the oldest patients: a cross-sectional analysis of three measures of multimorbidity in the BELFRAIL cohort. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015;21(1):39–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Le Cossec C, Perrine AL, Beltzer N, Fuhrman C, Carcaillon-Bentata L. Pre-frailty, frailty, and multimorbidity: prevalences and associated characteristics from two French national surveys. J Nutr Health Aging. 2016;20(8):860–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lutomski JE, Baars MA, Boter H, Buurman BM, den Elzen WP, Jansen AP, Kempen GI, Steunenberg B, Steyerberg EW, Olde Rikkert MG, Melis R. Frailty, disability and multi-morbidity: the relationship with quality of life and healthcare costs in elderly people. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A7297.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Woo J, Leung J. Multi-morbidity, dependency, and frailty singly or in combination have different impact on health outcomes. Age. 2014;36(2):923–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Malmstrom TK, Morley JE. SARC-F: a simple questionnaire to rapidly diagnose sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(8):531–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lam LC, Lui VW, Tam CW, Chiu HF. Subjective memory complaints in Chinese subjects with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;20(9):876–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Angela YCT, David WKM. The validation of the Hong Kong Chinese version of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale for institutionalized elderly persons. OTJR. 2002;22(4):132–42.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shimada H, Makizako H, Doi T, Yoshida D, Tsutsumimoto K, Anan Y, Uemura K, Ito T, Lee S, Park H, Suzuki T. Combined prevalence of frailty and mild cognitive impairment in a population of elderly Japanese people. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(7):518–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Han JW, So Y, Kim TH, Lee DY, Ryu SH, Kim SY, Kim SG, Kim SK, Youn JC, Jhoo JH, Kim JL, Lee SB, Lee JJ, Kwak KP, Moon SW, Kim BJ, Bae JN, Woo JI, Jeong H, Park JH, Kim YJ, Kim KW. Prevalence rates of dementia and mild cognitive impairment are affected by the diagnostic parameter changes for neurocognitive disorders in the DSM-5 in a Korean population. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;43(3–4):193–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(8):1487–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chung RY, Mercer S, Lai FTT, Yip BHK, Wong MCS, Wong SYS. Socioeconomic determinants of multimorbidity: a population-based household survey of Hong Kong Chinese. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140040.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu R, Wong M, Chang B, Lai X, Lum CM, Auyeung TW, Lee J, Tsoi K, Lee R, Woo J. Trends in activities of daily living disability in a large sample of community-dwelling Chinese older adults in Hong Kong: an age-period-cohort analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):e013259.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Care and attention homes for the elderly. https://www.swd.gov.hk/en/index/site_pubsvc/page_elderly/sub_residentia/id_careandatt/. Accessed 25 Feb 2018.

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust. The funder did not participate in the design of the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation and manuscript preparation.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong

    Johnny T. K. Cheung, Ruby Yu & Jean Woo

  2. Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong

    Ruby Yu, Zimu Wu & Jean Woo

  3. School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong

    Samuel Y.S. Wong

Authors
  1. Johnny T. K. Cheung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruby Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zimu Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Samuel Y.S. Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jean Woo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JC, RY, and JW participated in the design of the study. RY and JW collected the data. All authors analyzed and interpreted the data. JC drafted the manuscript. RY, ZW, SW, and JW critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johnny T. K. Cheung.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval was granted by the Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Written consent was obtained before the start of the survey.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheung, J.T.K., Yu, R., Wu, Z. et al. Geriatric syndromes, multimorbidity, and disability overlap and increase healthcare use among older Chinese. BMC Geriatr 18, 147 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0840-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0840-1

Keywords

  • Geriatric
  • Multimorbidity
  • Disability
  • Overlap
  • Outpatient
  • Hospital admission
  • Health service use

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us