Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Vitamin D supplementation to prevent depression and poor physical function in older adults: Study protocol of the D-Vitaal study, a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

BMC Geriatrics volume 15, Article number: 151 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Depressive symptoms and decreased physical functioning are interrelated conditions and common in older persons, causing significant individual and societal burden. Evidence suggests that vitamin D supplementation may be beneficial for both mental and physical functioning. However, previous randomized controlled trials have yielded inconsistent results and often had suboptimal designs. This study examines the effect of vitamin D supplementation on both depressive symptoms and physical functioning in a high-risk population of older persons with low vitamin D status.

Methods/design

The D-Vitaal study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigating the effects of a daily dose of 1200 IU vitamin D3 versus placebo for one year on depressive symptoms and physical functioning (primary outcomes) in older adults. Participants (N = 155, age 60–80 years) were recruited from the general population. Eligibility criteria included the presence of depressive symptoms, ≥1 functional limitation and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels between 15 and 50/70 nmol/L (depending on season). Secondary outcomes include incidence of major depressive disorder, anxiety symptoms, health-related quality of life, cognitive function and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.

Discussion

With this study, we aim to elucidate the effects of vitamin D supplementation on depressive symptoms and physical functioning in older persons who are at high risk of developing more substantial mental and physical problems. If effective, vitamin D supplementation can be a preventive intervention strategy that is easy to implement in the primary care setting.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register NTR3845. Registered 6 February 2013.

Peer Review reports

Background

Depressive symptoms are common in older adults, occurring in 8-16 % of persons over 55 years of age [1]. These symptoms are associated with various adverse health outcomes, such as a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases [2], hospitalization and mortality [3] and reduced quality of life [1]. Treatment of depression in older persons is often suboptimal, for example due to societal stigma, side-effects of anti-depressant medication, or interactions of antidepressants with other medications [2, 4]. Hence, development of a simple and safe prevention strategy is pivotal.

Ageing is also commonly accompanied by a decline of physical functioning. Studies show that functional limitations and poor physical performance are highly interrelated with depressive symptoms, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally [2, 5–9], which can easily result in a downward spiral.

Previous research suggests that vitamin D supplementation may improve both mental and physical health, although evidence is inconsistent [10–12]. Vitamin D inadequacy - defined as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels of <50 nmol/L [13] - occurs in about 50 % of elderly persons from Western countries [14]. Vitamin D is synthesized in the skin under the influence of sunlight. In addition, some vitamin D is retrieved from food, especially from fatty fish [15]. Causes of vitamin D deficiency in older persons include declining efficiency of the skin to synthesize vitamin D, a lower amount of sun exposure and reduced nutritional intake [16].

Several biological mechanisms that can explain the relationship of vitamin D deficiency with depressive symptoms and poor physical functioning have been suggested (see also Fig. 1). The active metabolite of vitamin D - 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) - is synthesized in the brain by the enzyme 1α-hydroxylase [17], enabling local activation of vitamin D. Moreover, the vitamin D receptor (VDR) is present in several brain areas important for depression and emotional behaviour, including the hippocampus and hypothalamus [18]. Furthermore, 1,25(OH)2D promotes the synthesis of depression-related monoamine neurotransmitters such as serotonin [17, 19, 20] and has a general protective effect on brain functioning through immunomodulation, anti-inflammatory action and promotion of neuroplasticity [17, 19, 21]. Regarding physical functioning, the VDR has been observed in the cerebellum [18], which is an important brain area for mobility, gait and balance [22]. In addition, the presence of 1,25(OH)2D and the VDR in muscle tissue facilitates muscle contraction speed, muscle power and cell growth [19].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pathophysiological effects of low vitamin D status on mental and physical functioning

Full size image

Prospective cohort studies suggest that vitamin D deficiency is associated with depressive symptoms, poor physical performance and functional limitations [23–26]. In the InChianti study, vitamin D deficiency at baseline almost doubled the risk of depressive symptoms after three and six years and was also associated with lower physical performance [27].

Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is diffuse and inconclusive. Tables 1 and 2 provide an overview of previous RCTs examining the effects of vitamin D supplementation on depressive symptoms and physical functioning. Only RCTs that included adults and had a sample size of ≥40 were selected (search strategy available from the author). From these tables, it can be concluded that previous RCTs have been heterogeneous with respect to sample size, age range of the participants, dosage of the supplementation, duration of the intervention and outcome measures. Moreover, only a very limited amount of studies included high-risk participants, i.e. persons with low serum 25(OH)D and mental/physical symptoms at baseline. It can be expected that supplementation is more effective and relevant in persons with low baseline 25(OH)D levels and in persons with clinically relevant depressive symptoms or reduced physical functioning.

Table 1 Overview of RCTs that examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on depression
Full size table
Table 2 Overview of RCTs that examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on physical functioning
Full size table

Four out of nine RCTs on depression (44 %) observed a significant positive effect of vitamin D supplementation on depressive symptoms (see Table 1). However, only two studies included persons with either low 25(OH)D or depression at baseline [28, 29], and only one study included persons with both characteristics [30]. The latter study and the study that included persons with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) [28] observed significant improvements after the supplementation.

Table 2 shows that in 14 out of 28 RCTs (50 %), vitamin D supplementation improved physical functioning. Twelve studies included participants with either low 25(OH)D or poor physical function at baseline, and physical function improved in seven (58 %) of these studies. Only one study included persons with both low 25(OH)D and poor physical function [31] and this trial observed a significant improvement of physical performance.

In conclusion, the effect of vitamin D supplementation seems more pronounced in persons with low 25(OH)D levels, depressive symptoms and poor physical function at baseline. However, RCTs that specifically included participants with these characteristics are scarce. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the combination of mental and physical functioning, despite the fact that these are interrelated concepts.

The current RCT aims to fill this knowledge gap by investigating whether older adults at high risk for poor mental and physical health can benefit from supplementation with vitamin D. Primarily, the D-Vitaal trial examines whether vitamin D supplementation improves depressive symptoms, functional limitations and physical performance in persons with low 25(OH)D levels, clinically relevant depressive symptoms and functional limitations. Other, secondary health outcomes are assessed as well, such as incident MDD [32], anxiety [33], health-related quality of life [34, 35] and cognitive functioning [36]. In addition, it will be investigated whether vitamin D supplementation is a cost-effective strategy for the above-mentioned aims. If proven effective, vitamin D supplementation can easily be implemented in the primary care setting as a simple and safe strategy to prevent both mental and physical disorders in the elderly population.

Methods/design

Design of the study

The D-Vitaal study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial that is carried out in the Netherlands. This study examines the effect of a daily dose of 1200 IU vitamin D3 versus placebo on depressive symptoms, functional limitations and physical performance. We included 155 participants aged 60–80 years. The duration of the intervention is one year. The D-Vitaal trial was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam and is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register under NTR3845. The D-Vitaal study adheres to the CONSORT guidelines for randomized controlled trials.

Participants

Potential participants were screened for presence of clinically relevant depressive symptoms, functional limitations and low serum 25(OH)D levels (≤50 or ≤70 nmol/L in winter (October-March) and summer (April-September), respectively). In this way, we recruited a vulnerable population at high risk of subsequent mental and physical function decline. As severe 25(OH)D deficiency can be associated with bone disease [37], persons with 25(OH)D levels of <15 nmol/L were excluded and referred to their GP for treatment. In addition, persons with a current MDD diagnosis were excluded, as the aim of this study is to prevent depression. Furthermore, persons who use antidepressant medication were excluded at screening because of possible interference of antidepressants with the effect of vitamin D on depressive symptoms. Persons with sufficient concentrations of 25(OH)D (>50 or >70 nmol/L in winter and summer, respectively) were also excluded, as it was expected that the effect of supplementation in these persons would be negligible. The summer/winter cut-off difference of 20 nmol/L was based on the observation by Van Schoor et al. that the seasonal variation of vitamin D levels in two cohorts of Dutch older persons was 14–24 nmol/L [38]. The Health Council of the Netherlands advises a supplement of 800 IU/day vitamin D for institutionalized persons [39]. Therefore, only community dwelling persons were included in the trial. Table 3 lists the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the D-Vitaal study. All participants provided written informed consent prior to the start of the intervention.

Table 3 Inclusion and exclusion criteria of the D-Vitaal study
Full size table

Recruitment and setting

The D-Vitaal study is carried out in Amsterdam and surrounding municipalities in the Netherlands. Both urban and rural areas were included. The majority of the participants was recruited through municipality registries. Municipalities in the surroundings of Amsterdam provided the addresses of inhabitants in the age range of 60–80 years. These persons received an information brochure about the study by mail. In addition, advertisement posters and information leaflets were distributed in community centres. About 20 % of participants was recruited through general practitioners (GPs) in Amsterdam. Using a standardized search in their electronic medical records, the GPs selected eligible patients between 60–80 years. These patients received a letter from their GP to draw their attention to the study. Finally, excluded participants of a previous clinical trial [40] who had indicated to be interested in contributing to future research, were invited to participate in the D-Vitaal study. Recruitment commenced in June 2013 and the inclusion was finalized in April 2015. Figure 2 shows a flow chart of the recruitment, selection and randomization in the D-Vitaal study.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Recruitment, selection and randomization in the D-Vitaal study

Full size image

Screening phase

The screening phase of the D-Vitaal study included two steps: a mailed questionnaire and a short interview including a blood sample. The screening questionnaire assessed presence of depressive symptoms (Centre of Epidemiological Studies - Depression scale (CES-D) score of ≥16 [41]) and functional limitations and was also used to exclude persons who use antidepressant medication, vitamin D >400 IU/day and/or calcium supplements >1000 mg/day. For the first 12 participants, we used only the Functional Limitations questionnaire of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA-FL) [42] for the assessment of functional limitations. A LASA-FL score of ≥1 indicates the presence of functional limitations. However, this instrument proved not sensitive enough for this study population, creating a large ceiling effect. Especially younger-old participants (e.g. persons in their early sixties) reported few or no problems on this scale, as their level of general functioning was still moderate to high. Therefore, we added the Physical Functioning subscale of the Short Form-36 Health Survey [43] (SF-36-PF) to the screening phase. The SF-36-PF contains 10 items on physical functioning and assesses a broader range of functional limitations. Having difficulty with at least one of the items of the SF-36-PF was regarded as presence of functional limitations. Persons who were eligible according to the screening questionnaire (presence of both depressive symptoms and functional limitations) were invited for a screening visit where presence of MDD was examined and a blood sample was drawn to determine serum 25(OH)D levels.

Intervention and randomisation

Participants were randomly allocated with a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment groups: vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1200 IU/day or placebo. Participants were stratified by sex and women were stratified by age (60–70 years/71–80 years). An independent pharmacist prepared three randomisation lists with computer-generated numbers using block sizes of four.

The intervention group takes three tablets of 400 IU vitamin D3 daily for a duration of 12 months. Based on earlier research, the daily dose of 1200 IU will lead to stable mean 25(OH)D levels of >80 nmol/L in the intervention group, with 90 % of individual 25(OH)D levels above 60 nmol/L within a few months [44, 45]. The placebo group receives identical tablets without vitamin D and it is expected that this group maintains a mean serum 25(OH)D level of about 45 nmol/L. Both the vitamin D and placebo tablets were purchased from Vemedia Manufacturing B.V., The Netherlands. The tablets are supplied in vials of 100 tablets for 6 months, 600 tablets at a time. Participants are allowed to take a (multi)vitamin D supplement with a maximum of 400 IU/day in addition to the study tablets.

Co-intervention

Calcium positively influences the bioavailability of vitamin D [46]. In addition, some effects of vitamin D may be caused by increased calcium absorption. Therefore, all participants were advised to use at least three dairy consumptions daily to ensure adequate calcium intake of about 1000 mg/day. Calcium intake was assessed with a structured questionnaire during the screening phase. If calcium intake was low (less than 2 dairy consumptions per day), calcium tablets of 500 mg/day were prescribed to these participants.

Study procedures

Face-to-face interviews take place at screening, baseline, six and 12 months. The baseline visit was timed closely after the screening phase. Shortly prior to the interviews, participants are asked to complete a mailed questionnaire to reduce interview time. Short telephone interviews are conducted after two weeks, three and nine months to check compliance and adverse events. Table 4 lists all measurements and their time points of the D-Vitaal study. Interviews and blood sampling are carried out by trained researchers or research nurses and take place at the participant’s home, at the VU University Medical Center, or at local community medical centres. The Endocrine Laboratory of the VU University Medical Center conducts the 25(OH)D determinations. Participants who discontinue taking the study tablets for any reason are asked to participate in the remaining follow-up measurements. Any (serious) adverse events are carefully monitored.

Table 4 Assessed domains, instruments and their time points in the D-Vitaal study
Full size table

Compliance

Compliance is checked by tablet count. To stimulate compliance, participants are contacted by telephone (after two weeks, three and nine months) and reminded at follow-up visits. The ultimate compliance check is the measurement of serum 25(OH)D after 6 months.

Outcomes

Primary outcomes

Depressive symptoms

The CES-D [41] is used to measure differences in mean change of depressive symptoms after 12 months between the two treatment groups. The CES-D contains 20 items with a score range of 0–60. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. A score of ≥16 is indicative of clinically relevant depressive symptoms. The CES-D is a widely used instrument that displays good psychometric properties in various elderly populations [47].

Functional limitations

The LASA-FL questionnaire [42] includes six items assessing common daily activities: climbing stairs, cutting toenails, walking 5 minutes outdoors without resting, rising from a chair, dressing/undressing oneself and using own or public transport. Participants indicate whether they are able to perform these activities without difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, only with help, or not at all. The instrument can be scored in two ways: by determining the amount of functional limitations (score range 0–6, with higher scores indicating presence of more functional limitations) and the degree of functional limitations (score range 0–24, with higher scores indicating more severe functional limitations). The LASA-FL is used to measure differences in mean change of the amount and degree of functional limitations after 12 months between the two treatment groups.

Physical performance

A modified version of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) [26, 48] is used to determine differences in mean change of objective physical performance between the treatment groups after 12 months. The SPPB includes a walking test (walking 3 meters, turning 180° and walking 3 meters back as fast as possible), a chair stands test (standing up from a chair without using hands five times as fast as possible) and a balance test (standing with feet in tandem stand (i.e. standing with one foot in front of the other, with the heel of one foot touching the toes of the other foot) for up to 30 seconds). Participants can score 0–4 points for each test, adding up to a maximum of 12 points, with higher scores indicating better performance. Reliability and validity of the SPPB are good [49].

Secondary outcomes

Incidence of MDD

The depression-section of the DSM IV-based Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI, version 2.1) [50] is used to assess presence of MDD. At six and 12 months, the CIDI is administered if a participant scores ≥16 on the CES-D.

Anxiety

The Beck Anxiety Index (BAI) [51, 52] is a well-validated questionnaire that contains 21 items measuring anxiety symptoms that are relatively distinguishable from depression symptoms.

Cognition

Cognitive function is assessed with indicators of information processing speed and executive functioning obtained from the Stroop-Colour Word Test [53].

Health-related quality of life

Health-related quality of life is measured with the EuroQol - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) [54] and the SF-36 [43]. The EQ-5D is a utility instrument that enables the calculation of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY’s). The SF-36 Mental Component Summary score (MCS) and Physical Component Summary score (PCS) are used as a measure of mental and physical health-related quality of life, respectively [43]. Both instruments are widely used and well-validated in older populations [43, 55].

Timed Up-and-Go test

With the Timed Up-And-Go Test (TUG), functional mobility is assessed by asking the participant to stand up from a standard chair, walk a 3 meter distance, turn, walk back to the chair and sit down again [56].

Hand grip strength

Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a strain-gauged dynamometer (Takei TKK 5401, Takei Scientific Instruments Co. Ltd., Japan). Participants are asked to apply maximum force on the device while in a standing position. Grip strength is measured twice for each hand, consecutively alternating between both hands. The hand grip strength score is derived by taking the mean of the highest score for each hand.

Economic evaluation

To evaluate whether vitamin D is a cost-effective intervention for the prevention of depression and poor physical function in older persons, an economic evaluation will be performed. Dutch costing guidelines will be used [57]. All relevant costs will be measured and valued, including the costs of the vitamin D intervention. Health care utilization is measured with the Trimbos and iMTA questionnaire on Costs associated with Psychiatric illness (TiC-P) [58]. Health care costs include costs of GP and psychiatric care, ambulatory and outpatient hospital care, physical therapists and home care. Costs of production loss are not included, as the majority of the participants does not have a paid job.

Possible covariables

Several variables are measured during the trial to check for possible (chance-based) differences between the treatment groups. Height and weight are measured with a calibrated stadiometer and scale, respectively. Body mass index (BMI) is calculated by dividing weight (in kilograms) by height2 (in meters). Waist and calf circumference is assessed with a tape-measure. Blood pressure and pulse are assessed twice with a three-minute interval using the Omron M1 Plus device (Omron Healthcare Europe). The date of the baseline interview is used to measure seasonal variation of serum 25(OH)D levels [38]. Structured questionnaires assess age, gender, education level, marital status, smoking behaviour, alcohol use, current medication and supplement use, use of corticosteroids in the past three months, chronic diseases, physical activity (walking, cycling, gardening, household activities and sports [59], vitamin D predictors (exposure to sunlight, skin pigmentation, consumption of fatty fish) [60] and use of counselling.

Blood sampling and assessment of serum 25(OH)D

Blood samples are obtained in the morning by a trained research nurse at screening and 6 months for measurement of serum 25(OH)D. Participants are in a fasted state with regard to dairy products. Serum 25(OH)D is determined using liquid chromatography followed by tandem mass spectrometry [61]. At screening, 25(OH)D was determined immediately after blood sampling. The 25(OH)D determinations of the 6-month blood samples will be carried out at the end of the study, to ensure randomization concealment. Serum, EDTA plasma and whole blood samples are stored frozen (−80 ° C) until determination and for potential future biomarker and DNA research.

Power calculation

The primary outcomes of the D-Vitaal study are change in depressive symptoms (CES-D score) and change in physical functioning (functional limitations and physical performance) after 12 months. In an RCT with a comparable population (older persons from the community with depressive symptoms but no MDD), the mean CES-D score was 26 (SD: 5.1) [62]. To detect a change of 0.5 SD (i.e. 2.5 points change of CES-D score), a total of 40 subjects per group is needed, assuming a power of 80 %, a two-sided alpha of .05 and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of .70 between baseline and follow-up measurements.

The SPPB score ranges from 0 to 12. A change of one point (SD: 1.5) is regarded as a meaningful change [63]. Assuming the same power, alpha and ICC as the CES-D calculation, 22 participants per group are needed.

The LASA-FL questionnaire is scored in two ways: by determining the amount (score range 0–6) and the degree (score range 0–24) of functional limitations. A change of one point in the amount of functional limitations can be regarded as a meaningful change [64]. The SD was set on 1.7, based on analyses in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA), a large prospective cohort study of older persons. Assuming again the same power, alpha and ICC as the previous calculations, at least 28 persons per group should be included. For the degree of functional limitations, no meaningful change data or RCTs could be identified in the literature. Based on analyses in LASA, a mean difference of 2 points can be expected, with an SD of 4.5. For this outcome, 48 persons per group are needed, using the same assumptions as indicated above. Considering an expected dropout of 25 % and uncertainty of the 25(OH)D assay, we aimed to include at least 70 participants per group, altogether at least 140 participants.

Data analysis

Baseline characteristics between treatment groups will be compared using Pearson Chi-square tests, independent-samples t-tests, one-way ANOVAs, or non-parametric tests. Persons who drop out will be compared to persons who complete the study. Skewed data will be transformed. Data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle with longitudinal data analysis techniques (generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis or mixed model analysis) using SPSS (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). A double-sided p-value of .05 will be regarded as statistically significant. If needed, models will be adjusted for relevant confounding variables. To investigate the interrelatedness of depressive symptoms and physical functioning, these variables will be added to each other’s effect analysis in separate models. Effect modification will be investigated for age, gender and baseline serum 25(OH)D levels.

Per-protocol analyses will be performed as a secondary analysis with participants who were compliant with the study protocol (≥80 % tablet intake). As a compliance check, the improvement of vitamin D status - i.e. the number of participants with serum 25(OH)D levels over 50, 60 and 75 nmol/L - will also be analysed in secondary analyses. Finally, as a sensitivity analysis, it will be investigated whether change in serum 25(OH)D is associated with change in depressive symptoms, functional limitations and physical performance over time in the total study sample (irrespective of treatment group).

The economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective with a time horizon of 12 months. The analysis will be done according to the intention-to-treat principle. Missing cost and effect data will be imputed using multiple imputation according to the MICE algorithm [65]. Bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrapping with 5000 replications will be used to calculate 95 % confidence intervals around the mean difference in total costs between the two groups. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) will be calculated by dividing the difference in mean total costs by the difference in mean effects on the primary outcomes (depressive symptoms, functional limitations and physical performance) between the treatment groups. A cost-utility analysis will be performed estimating the incremental costs per QALY gained. Bootstrapping will be used to estimate the uncertainty surrounding the ICERs, which will be graphically presented on cost-effectiveness planes. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and net monetary benefits will also be calculated. Sensitivity analyses will be performed on the most important and uncertain cost parameters.

Discussion

As depressive symptoms and poor physical functioning are prevalent among older persons and cause significant individual and societal burden [66], effective low-cost prevention strategies are urgently needed. The D-Vitaal study aims to examine whether vitamin D supplementation decreases depressive symptoms and functional limitations and improves physical performance in older adults. The majority of RCTs that examined vitamin D supplementation included participants with adequate serum 25(OH)D levels and good mental and physical health, which may explain the absence of effects of some previous clinical trials in the field [12].

The D-Vitaal trial is innovative in several ways: it includes persons who may benefit most from the supplementation: older persons with low serum 25(OH)D levels and at high risk for developing poor mental and physical health. Furthermore, the tight interrelationship between depressive symptoms and physical functioning is taken into account by targeting both concepts in one RCT. Physical functioning is measured comprehensively with both self-reported questionnaires and objective tests. Finally, MDD diagnosis is included as a secondary outcome measure. This enables us to explore the effect of the vitamin D supplementation on the development of MDD. To our knowledge, this outcome has not been investigated previously in an RCT [12].

It is more urgent to study the effects of vitamin D supplementation in persons with inadequate vitamin D levels than to examine whether there are any additional effects of supplementation above normal ranges [67]. The amount of supplementation (1200 IU/ day) used in the D-Vitaal study is a moderate dose, but sufficient to correct for deficiency and obtain an adequate vitamin D status [44, 45].

If the results of the D-Vitaal trial indicate that vitamin D supplementation is effective in reducing depressive symptoms and improving physical functioning in older adults, vitamin D can be an efficient intervention that targets two prevalent adverse health conditions simultaneously. The economic evaluation will provide evidence on the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. As vitamin D supplementation is inexpensive and displays minimal side effects, opportunities for implementation in the primary care setting seem promising. The first results of the D-Vitaal study are expected in 2016.

Abbreviations

1,25(OH)2D:

1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D

25(OH)D:

25 hydroxyvitamin D

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

BAI:

Beck Anxiety Inventory

BMI:

body mass index

CES-D:

Centre of Epidemiological Studies - Depression scale

CIDI:

Composite International Diagnostic Interview

DSM:

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

EQ-5D:

EuroQol-5 Dimensions

EQ-VAS:

EuroQol Visual Analog Scale

GEE:

generalized estimating equations

GP:

general practitioner

ICC:

intraclass correlation coefficient

ICER:

incremental cost-effectiveness ratios

LASA-FL:

Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam Functional Limitations questionnaire

MCS:

Mental Component Summary (SF-36)

MDD:

major depressive disorder

PCS:

Physical Component Summary score (SF-36)

QALY:

quality-adjusted life year

RCT:

randomized controlled trial

SF-36:

Short Form-36 Health Survey

SPPB:

Short Physical Performance Battery

TiC-P:

Trimbos and iMTA questionnaire on Costs associated with Psychiatric illness

TUG test:

Timed Up-and-Go test

VDR:

vitamin D receptor

References

  1. Blazer DG. Depression in late life: review and commentary. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003;58:249–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hall CA, Reynolds-Iii CF. Late-life depression in the primary care setting: challenges, collaborative care, and prevention. Maturitas. 2014;79:147–52.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prina AM, Deeg D, Brayne C, Beekman A, Huisman M. The association between depressive symptoms and non-psychiatric hospitalisation in older adults. PLoS One. 2012;7, e34821.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prins MA, Verhaak PFM, Hilbink-Smolders M, Spreeuwenberg P, Laurant MGH, van der Meer K, et al. Outcomes for depression and anxiety in primary care and details of treatment: a naturalistic longitudinal study. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:180.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Braam AW, Prince MJ, Beekman ATF, Delespaul P, Dewey ME, Geerlings SW, et al. Physical health and depressive symptoms in older Europeans. Results from EURODEP. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187:35–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bromberger JT, di Scalea TL. Longitudinal associations between depression and functioning in midlife women. Maturitas. 2009;64:145–59.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Penninx BW, Deeg DJ, van Eijk JT, Beekman AT, Guralnik JM. Changes in depression and physical decline in older adults: a longitudinal perspective. J Affect Disord. 2000;61:1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vink D, Aartsen MJ, Schoevers RA. Risk factors for anxiety and depression in the elderly: a review. J Affect Disord. 2008;106:29–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nyunt MSZ, Lim ML, Yap KB, Ng TP. Changes in depressive symptoms and functional disability among community-dwelling depressive older adults. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24:1633–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beaudart C, Buckinx F, Rabenda V, Gillain S, Cavalier E, Slomian J, et al. The effects of vitamin D on skeletal muscle strength, muscle mass, and muscle power: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:4336–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gowda U, Mutowo MP, Smith BJ, Wluka AE, Renzaho AMN. Vitamin D supplementation to reduce depression in adults: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrition. 2015;31:421–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaffer JA, Edmondson D, Wasson LT, Falzon L, Homma K, Ezeokoli N, et al. Vitamin D supplementation for depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychosom Med. 2014;76:190–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuchuk NO, Pluijm SMF, van Schoor NM, Looman CWN, Smit JH, Lips P. Relationships of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D to bone mineral density and serum parathyroid hormone and markers of bone turnover in older persons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1244–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lips P, van Schoor NM, de Jongh RT. Diet, sun, and lifestyle as determinants of vitamin D status. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1317:92–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lips P. Vitamin D, deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly: consequences for bone loss and fractures and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:477–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Abreu DA F, Eyles D, Feron F. Vitamin D, a neuro-immunomodulator: implications for neurodegenerative and autoimmune diseases. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34(1):S265–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eyles DW, Smith S, Kinobe R, Hewison M, McGrath JJ. Distribution of the vitamin D receptor and 1 alpha-hydroxylase in human brain. J Chem Neuroanat. 2005;29:21–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Annweiler C, Montero-Odasso M, Schott AM, Berrut G, Fantino B, Beauchet O. Fall prevention and vitamin D in the elderly: an overview of the key role of the non-bone effects. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010;7:50.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kesby JP, Eyles DW, Burne THJ, McGrath JJ. The effects of vitamin D on brain development and adult brain function. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011;347:121–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eyles DW, Burne THJ, McGrath JJ. Vitamin D, effects on brain development, adult brain function and the links between low levels of vitamin D and neuropsychiatric disease. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2013;34:47–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holtzer R, Epstein N, Mahoney JR, Izzetoglu M, Blumen HM. Neuroimaging of mobility in aging: a targeted review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:1375–88.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoogendijk WJG, Lips P, Dik MG, Deeg DJH, Beekman ATF, Penninx BWJH. Depression is associated with decreased 25-hydroxyvitamin D and increased parathyroid hormone levels in older adults. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:508–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Milaneschi Y, Hoogendijk W, Lips P, Heijboer AC, Schoevers R, van Hemert AM, et al. The association between low vitamin D and depressive disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:444–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sohl E, de Jongh RT, Heijboer AC, Swart KMA, Brouwer-Brolsma EM, Enneman AW, et al. Vitamin D status is associated with physical performance: the results of three independent cohorts. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24:187–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wicherts IS, van Schoor NM, Boeke AJ, Visser M, Deeg DJH, Smit J, et al. Vitamin D status predicts physical performance and its decline in older persons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:2058–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Milaneschi Y, Shardell M, Corsi AM, Vazzana R, Bandinelli S, Guralnik JM, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and depressive symptoms in older women and men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:3225–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Khoraminya N, Tehrani-Doost M, Jazayeri S, Hosseini A, Djazayery A. Therapeutic effects of vitamin D as adjunctive therapy to fluoxetine in patients with major depressive disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013;47:271–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kjaergaard M, Waterloo K, Wang CEA, Almas B, Figenschau Y, Hutchinson MS, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplement on depression scores in people with low levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D: nested case–control study and randomised clinical trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201:360–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mozaffari-Khosravi H, Nabizade L, Yassini-Ardakani SM, Hadinedoushan H, Barzegar K. The effect of 2 different single injections of high dose of vitamin D on improving the depression in depressed patients with vitamin D deficiency: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013;33:378–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dhesi JK, Jackson SHD, Bearne LM, Moniz C, Hurley MV, Swift CG, et al. Vitamin D supplementation improves neuromuscular function in older people who fall. Age Ageing. 2004;33:589–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Williams JA, Sink KM, Tooze JA, Atkinson HH, Cauley JA, Yaffe K, et al. Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations predict incident depression in well-functioning older adults: the health, aging, and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70:757–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Armstrong DJ, Meenagh GK, Bickle I, Lee ASH, Curran ES, Finch MB. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with anxiety and depression in fibromyalgia. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26:551–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Motsinger S, Lazovich D, MacLehose RF, Torkelson CJ, Robien K. Vitamin D intake and mental health-related quality of life in older women: the Iowa Women's Health Study. Maturitas. 2012;71:267–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sakalli H, Arslan D, Yucel AE. The effect of oral and parenteral vitamin D supplementation in the elderly: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32:2279–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schlogl M, Holick MF. Vitamin D and neurocognitive function. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:559–68.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Need AG, O'Loughlin PD, Morris HA, Coates PS, Horowitz M, Nordin BEC. Vitamin D metabolites and calcium absorption in severe vitamin D deficiency. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:1859–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. van Schoor NM, Knol DL, Deeg DJH, Peters FPAM, Heijboer AC, Lips P. Longitudinal changes and seasonal variations in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in different age groups: results of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:1483–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gezondheidsraad (Health Council of the Netherlands). Evaluatie van de voedingsnormen voor vitamine D (Evaluation of the dieatary reference values for vitamin D). http://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/nl/taak-werkwijze/werkterrein/gezonde-voeding/evaluatie-van-devoedingsnormen-voor-vitamine-d. (2008). Accessed 9 Nov, 2012.

  40. van Wijngaarden JP, Swart KMA, Enneman AW, Dhonukshe-Rutten RAM, van Dijk SC, Ham AC, et al. Effect of daily vitamin B-12 and folic acid supplementation on fracture incidence in elderly individuals with an elevated plasma homocysteine concentration: B-PROOF, a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:1578–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bisschop MI, Kriegsman DMW, van Tilburg TG, Penninx BWJH, van Eijk JT, Deeg DJH. The influence of differing social ties on decline in physical functioning among older people with and without chronic diseases: the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2003;15:164–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chel V, Wijnhoven HAH, Smit JH, Ooms M, Lips P. Efficacy of different doses and time intervals of oral vitamin D supplementation with or without calcium in elderly nursing home residents. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:663–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lips P, Wiersinga A, van Ginkel FC, Jongen MJ, Netelenbos JC, Hackeng WH, et al. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D status and parathyroid function in elderly subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67:644–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lips P. Interaction between vitamin D and calcium. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2012;243:60–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. van de Rest O, van der Zwaluw N, Beekman ATF, de Groot LCPG, Geleijnse JM. The reliability of three depression rating scales in a general population of Dutch older persons. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25:998–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49:M85–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Freire AN, Guerra RO, Alvarado B, Guralnik JM, Zunzunegui MV. Validity and reliability of the short physical performance battery in two diverse older adult populations in Quebec and Brazil. J Aging Health. 2012;24:863–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Andrews G, Peters L. The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998;33:80–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:893–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Julian LJ. Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken ). 2011;63 Suppl 11:S467–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Klein M, Ponds RW, Houx PJ, Jolles J. Effect of test duration on age-related differences in Stroop interference. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997;19:77–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F, editors. The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: a European perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic publishers; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998;316:736–41.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lin MR, Hwang HF, Hu MH, Wu HDI, Wang YW, Huang FC. Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and Tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:1343–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH. Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20:443–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bouwmans C, De Jong K, Timman R, Zijlstra-Vlasveld M, Van der Feltz-Cornelis C, Tan Swan S, et al. Feasibility, reliability and validity of a questionnaire on healthcare consumption and productivity loss in patients with a psychiatric disorder (TiC-P). BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:217.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Stel VS, Smit JH, Pluijm SMF, Visser M, Deeg DJH, Lips P. Comparison of the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire with a 7-day diary and pedometer. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:252–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. van Schoor NM, Lips P. Worldwide vitamin D status. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25:671–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Heijboer AC, Blankenstein MA, Kema IP, Buijs MM. Accuracy of 6 routine 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays: influence of vitamin D binding protein concentration. Clin Chem. 2012;58:543–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Veer-Tazelaar PJ, van Marwijk HWJ, van Oppen P, van Hout HPJ, van der Horst HE, Cuijpers P, et al. Stepped-care prevention of anxiety and depression in late life: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:743–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Hoogendijk E, van Groenou MB, van Tilburg T, Deeg D. Educational differences in functional limitations: comparisons of 55-65-year-olds in the Netherlands in 1992 and 2002. Int J Public Health. 2008;53:281–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. van Buuren S, Oudshoorn C. Multivariate imputation by chained equations. Leiden: TNO Prevention and Health, Public Health; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  66. World Health Organization: The global burden of disease 2004 update. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/2004_report_update/en/. (2008). Accessed 20 July 2015.

  67. Spedding S. Vitamin D, and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing studies with and without biological flaws. Nutrients. 2014;6:1501–18.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lansdowne AT, Provost SC. Vitamin D3 enhances mood in healthy subjects during winter. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998;135:319–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Jorde R, Sneve M, Figenschau Y, Svartberg J, Waterloo K. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on symptoms of depression in overweight and obese subjects: randomized double blind trial. J Intern Med. 2008;264:599–609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Sanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, Jacka FN, Dodd S, Nicholson G, et al. Annual high-dose vitamin D3 and mental well-being: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;198:357–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Dean AJ, Bellgrove MA, Hall T, Phan WMJ, Eyles DW, Kvaskoff D, et al. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on cognitive and emotional functioning in young adults--a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2011;6, e25966.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Bertone-Johnson ER, Powers SI, Spangler L, Larson J, Michael YL, Millen AE, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and depression in the women's health initiative calcium and vitamin D trial. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176:1–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Yalamanchili V, Gallagher JC. Treatment with hormone therapy and calcitriol did not affect depression in older postmenopausal women: no interaction with estrogen and vitamin D receptor genotype polymorphisms. Menopause. 2012;19:697–703.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Grady D, Halloran B, Cummings S, Leveille S, Wells L, Black D, et al. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and muscle strength in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73:1111–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW, Abrams C, Nachtigall D, Hansen C. Effects of a short-term vitamin D and calcium supplementation on body sway and secondary hyperparathyroidism in elderly women. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:1113–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Bischoff HA, Stahelin HB, Dick W, Akos R, Knecht M, Salis C, et al. Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on falls: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:343–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Kenny AM, Biskup B, Robbins B, Marcella G, Burleson JA. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on strength, physical function, and health perception in older, community-dwelling men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1762–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Latham NK, Anderson CS, Lee A, Bennett DA, Moseley A, Cameron ID. A randomized, controlled trial of quadriceps resistance exercise and vitamin D in frail older people: the Frailty Interventions Trial in Elderly Subjects (FITNESS). J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:291–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Gallagher JC. The effects of calcitriol on falls and fractures and physical performance tests. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;89–90:497–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Sato Y, Iwamoto J, Kanoko T, Satoh K. Low-dose vitamin D prevents muscular atrophy and reduces falls and hip fractures in women after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20:187–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Conzelmann M, Stahelin HB, Dick W, Carpenter MG, Adkin AL, et al. Is fall prevention by vitamin D mediated by a change in postural or dynamic balance? Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:656–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Bunout D, Barrera G, Leiva L, Gattas V, de la Maza MP, Avendano M, et al. Effects of vitamin D supplementation and exercise training on physical performance in Chilean vitamin D deficient elderly subjects. Exp Gerontol. 2006;41:746–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Smedshaug GB, Pedersen JI, Meyer HE. Can vitamin D supplementation improve grip strength in elderly nursing home residents? A double-blind controlled trial. Scand J Food Nutrition. 2007;51:74–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Brunner RL, Cochrane B, Jackson RD, Larson J, Lewis C, Limacher M, et al. Calcium, vitamin D supplementation, and physical function in the Women's Health Initiative. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:1472–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Moreira-Pfrimer LDF, Pedrosa MAC, Teixeira L, Lazaretti-Castro M. Treatment of vitamin D deficiency increases lower limb muscle strength in institutionalized older people independently of regular physical activity: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Ann Nutr Metab. 2009;54:291–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW, Suppan K, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Dobnig H. Effects of a long-term vitamin D and calcium supplementation on falls and parameters of muscle function in community-dwelling older individuals. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:315–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Songpatanasilp T, Chailurkit LO, Nichachotsalid A, Chantarasorn M. Combination of alfacalcidol with calcium can improve quadriceps muscle strength in elderly ambulatory Thai women who have hypovitaminosis D: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92(5):S30–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Janssen HCJP, Samson MM, Verhaar HJJ. Muscle strength and mobility in vitamin D-insufficient female geriatric patients: a randomized controlled trial on vitamin D and calcium supplementation. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010;22:78–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Lips P, Binkley N, Pfeifer M, Recker R, Samanta S, Cohn DA, et al. Once-weekly dose of 8400 IU vitamin D(3) compared with placebo: effects on neuromuscular function and tolerability in older adults with vitamin D insufficiency. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:985–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Witham MD, Crighton LJ, Gillespie ND, Struthers AD, McMurdo MET. The effects of vitamin D supplementation on physical function and quality of life in older patients with heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2010;3:195–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Zhu K, Austin N, Devine A, Bruce D, Prince RL. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of vitamin D on muscle strength and mobility in older women with vitamin D insufficiency. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:2063–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Glendenning P, Zhu K, Inderjeeth C, Howat P, Lewis JR, Prince RL. Effects of three-monthly oral 150,000 IU cholecalciferol supplementation on falls, mobility, and muscle strength in older postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:170–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Hornikx M, Van Remoortel H, Lehouck A, Mathieu C, Maes K, Gayan-Ramirez G, et al. Vitamin D supplementation during rehabilitation in COPD: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Respir Res. 2012;13:84.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Kampman MT, Steffensen LH, Mellgren SI, Jorgensen L. Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on relapses, disease progression, and measures of function in persons with multiple sclerosis: exploratory outcomes from a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Mult Scler. 2012;18:1144–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Hara S, Kishimoto KN, Okuno H, Tanaka M, Saito H, Oizumi A, et al. Effects of alfacalcidol on back extensor strength gained through back extensor exercise in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92:101–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. McAlindon T, LaValley M, Schneider E, Nuite M, Lee JY, Price LL, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on progression of knee pain and cartilage volume loss in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2013;309:155–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Sanghi D, Mishra A, Sharma AC, Singh A, Natu SM, Agarwal S, et al. Does vitamin D improve osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3556–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Knutsen KV, Madar AA, Lagerlov P, Brekke M, Raastad T, Stene LC, et al. Does vitamin D improve muscle strength in adults? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among ethnic minorities in Norway. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:194–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Wood AD, Secombes KR, Thies F, Aucott LS, Black AJ, Reid DM, et al. A parallel group double-blind RCT of vitamin D3 assessing physical function: is the biochemical response to treatment affected by overweight and obesity? Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:305–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Rolighed L, Rejnmark L, Sikjaer T, Heickendorff L, Vestergaard P, Mosekilde L, et al. No beneficial effects of vitamin D supplementation on muscle function or quality of life in primary hyperparathyroidism: results from a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172:609–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to all participants of the D-Vitaal study for their valued contributions. We would like to thank all general practitioners and municipalities that helped us with the recruitment of participants. Furthermore, we thank our research assistants Ans Nicolaas and Nicolette Pliester for their dedicated work and all students and colleagues involved in the D-Vitaal study for their most-appreciated assistance.

The D-Vitaal study is funded by The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), the Hague, the Netherlands (grant number 200210022). ZonMw had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Elisa J. de Koning, Natasja M. van Schoor, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx, Petra J.M. Elders, Jan. H. Smit, Maurits W. van Tulder, Harm W.J. van Marwijk & Paul Lips

  2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Elisa J. de Koning & Natasja M. van Schoor

  3. Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center/GGZ inGeest, A.J. Ernststraat 1187, P.O. Box 1081 HL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Brenda W.J.H. Penninx & Jan. H. Smit

  4. Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Petra J.M. Elders & Harm W.J. van Marwijk

  5. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Endocrine Laboratory, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Annemieke C. Heijboer

  6. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Pierre M. Bet

  7. Department of Health Sciences, VU University, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Maurits W. van Tulder

  8. Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrine section, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Martin den Heijer & Paul Lips

  9. Primary Care Research Centre, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom

    Harm W.J. van Marwijk

Authors
  1. Elisa J. de Koning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Natasja M. van Schoor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brenda W.J.H. Penninx
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Petra J.M. Elders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Annemieke C. Heijboer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jan. H. Smit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pierre M. Bet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Maurits W. van Tulder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Martin den Heijer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Harm W.J. van Marwijk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Paul Lips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natasja M. van Schoor.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

NMvS and PL primarily designed the D-Vitaal study, all other authors contributed to the design; PL is the principal investigator; NMvS is the trial coordinator; EJdK, NMvS, HWJvM, BWJHP, PJME and PL conduct the research, ACH coordinates the serum 25(OH)D determinations from blood samples; PMB coordinates the issuing of the study tablets; MWvT designed the economic evaluation study; MdH and JHS assist with the statistical analyses, EJdK collects the data (together with the research assistants) and drafted the manuscript; all authors provided critical revision of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Koning, E.J., van Schoor, N.M., Penninx, B.W. et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent depression and poor physical function in older adults: Study protocol of the D-Vitaal study, a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. BMC Geriatr 15, 151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0148-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0148-3

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us