Skip to main content
Download PDF

Associations between sarcopenia and circulating branched-chain amino acids: a cross-sectional study over 100,000 participants

BMC Geriatrics volume 24, Article number: 541 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Emerging evidence suggests that alterations in BCAA metabolism may contribute to the pathogenesis of sarcopenia. However, the relationship between branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) and sarcopenia is incompletely understood, and existing literature presents conflicting results. In this study, we conducted a community-based study involving > 100,000 United Kingdom adults to comprehensively explore the association between BCAAs and sarcopenia, and assess the potential role of muscle mass in mediating the relationship between BCAAs and muscle strength.

Methods

Multivariable linear regression analysis examined the relationship between circulating BCAAs and muscle mass/strength. Logistic regression analysis assessed the impact of circulating BCAAs and quartiles of BCAAs on sarcopenia risk. Subgroup analyses explored the variations in associations across age, and gender. Mediation analysis investigated the potential mediating effect of muscle mass on the BCAA-muscle strength relationship.

Results

Among 108,017 participants (mean age: 56.40 ± 8.09 years; 46.23% men), positive associations were observed between total BCAA, isoleucine, leucine, valine, and muscle mass (beta, 0.56–2.53; p < 0.05) and between total BCAA, leucine, valine, and muscle strength (beta, 0.91–3.44; p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that increased circulating valine was associated with a 47% reduced sarcopenia risk (odds ratio = 0.53; 95% confidence interval = 0.3–0.94; p = 0.029). Subgroup analyses demonstrated strong associations between circulating BCAAs and muscle mass/strength in men and individuals aged ≥ 60 years. Mediation analysis suggested that muscle mass completely mediated the relationship between total BCAA, and valine levels and muscle strength, partially mediated the relationship between leucine levels and muscle strength, obscuring the true effect of isoleucine on muscle strength.

Conclusion

This study suggested the potential benefits of BCAAs in preserving muscle mass/strength and highlighted muscle mass might be mediator of BCAA-muscle strength association. Our findings contribute new evidence for the clinical prevention and treatment of sarcopenia and related conditions involving muscle mass/strength loss.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Sarcopenia is characterized by the progressive loss of muscle mass, strength, and function. It is a significant public health concern, particularly among older adults and is associated with an increased risk of falls, fractures, physical disability, and mortality [1, 2]. With the continuous increase in global life expectancy and the escalating trend of population aging, the prevalence of sarcopenia is expected to increase in the coming decades, posing a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide [3]. Currently, there is a lack of clinically effective therapeutic drugs for sarcopenia, which presents a significant barrier to its treatment [4]. Therefore, it is imperative to explore effective preventive and treatment strategies for this disease.

Recently, there has been a growing interest in the potential role of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) in the development and progression of sarcopenia. BCAAs, including isoleucine, leucine, and valine, are essential amino acids that cannot be synthesized by the human body and must be obtained from dietary sources [5]. These amino acids play a vital role in muscle protein metabolism by acting as substrates for protein synthesis and regulators of muscle protein turnover [6,7,8,9].

Emerging evidence suggests that alterations in BCAA metabolism contribute to the pathogenesis of sarcopenia. Studies have reported lower levels of circulating BCAAs in individuals with sarcopenia compared to healthy individuals [10, 11], suggesting a potential protective role of BCAAs against sarcopenia [12,13,14]. Furthermore, some studies based on metabolomics techniques have found that circulating BCAAs are associated with muscle mass in functionally limited elderly individuals [15], poor muscle quality in the elderly [16], muscle function in older Japanese women [17], and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults [18]. Despite these findings, the relationship between BCAAs and sarcopenia-related traits is incompletely understood, and existing literature presents conflicting results. A meta-analysis reported a positive association between BCAA levels and muscle strength [11], consistent with a previous study that investigated the effects of complex protein supplements on muscle strength [19]. However, this contradicts the findings of other meta-analyses that reported no significant differences between BCAA levels and handgrip strength in individuals aged > 60 years [20, 21] and non-frail older individuals [22]. Although these studies did not control for important confounders (e.g., socioeconomic status and education score); were limited by small sample sizes; did not discuss the differences by age and gender; mainly focused on the population aged > 60 years; and had inconsistent results, they suggested a potential link between BCAAs and sarcopenia-related traits (muscle mass/strength).

In this present study, we conducted the largest-scale community-based cohort study, enrolling over 100,000 adults from the United Kingdom (UK), to comprehensively investigate the association between circulating BCAAs (i.e., total BCAA, isoleucine, leucine, and valine) and muscle mass/strength. Previous study demonstrated that wasting protein energy can cause a decline in muscle mass, leading to reduced strength [23]. Thus, we employed mediation analysis [24] for the first time, considering the potential mediating role of muscle mass in the association between circulating branched-chain amino acids and muscle strength. This study presents novel evidence contributing to the clinical understanding and management of sarcopenia and other conditions linked to the depletion of muscle mass and strength.

Materials and methods

Participants

This cross-sectional analysis utilized data from the UK Biobank cohort, an ongoing multicenter study comprising approximately 500,000 individuals aged 38–73 years between 2006 and 2010. Participants were recruited from 22 centers across England, Scotland, and Wales for initial assessments. Clinical and biochemical information was obtained through touchscreen questionnaires, physical examinations, sample collection, and electronic health records within the UK Biobank cohort. Ethical approval was obtained from the North-west Multicenter Research Ethics Committee, and all participants provided written informed consent. Additional details about the UK Biobank project can be found in other published work [25]. Among the 117,976 participants with available BCAAs data, 9,959 participants with missing data for at least one variable were excluded, resulting in a final analysis cohort of 108,017 participants. A flowchart of the study is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study. The number of participants (N) in the population enrollment process. BCAAs, Branched-chain amino acids; ALM/H2, appendicular lean mass divided by height squared; HGS, hand grip strength

Full size image

BCAA quantification

BCAA quantification followed established protocols described in previous publications [26,27,28,29]. EDTA plasma samples were collected from the UK Biobank (UKB), consisting of 118,000 samples at baseline and additional 5,000 samples for repeat assessment. These samples were transported to the Nightingale Health Laboratories in Finland and analyzed between June 2019 and April 2020 using a high throughput targeted nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics platform (Nightingale Health Plc; biomarker quantification version 2020). This platform enabled the simultaneous quantification of 249 metabolic measures, including the absolute concentrations of various metabolites and their ratios. Metabolites were measured following standard biochemical analysis protocols with laboratory staff blinded to the associated health outcomes. Subsequently, in late May 2020, the metabolomic data were compiled and linked to clinical information in the UK Biobank. The dataset was submitted to the UK Biobank Research Ethics Committee in March 2021. In this study, the BCAAs included total BCAA, isoleucine, leucine, and valine. The circulating concentrations of total BCAA (UKB Field 23,464), isoleucine (UKB Field 23,465), leucine (UKB Field 23,466), and valine (UKB Field 23,467) were extracted from the UK Biobank dataset. The circulating concentration of total BCAA was equal to the sum of the circulating concentrations of isoleucine, leucine, and valine.

Measurement of sarcopenia-related traits

This study used hand grip strength (HGS) (UKB Fields 46 and 47) and appendicular lean mass (ALM) as physical capability markers to define sarcopenia [1]. HGS was measured using a Jamar J00105 hydraulic hand dynamometer, with one measurement recorded for each hand. The average HGS, expressed in kilograms (kg), was used for subsequent analysis. ALM was estimated using the Janssen equation [30] applied to the total body composition measured by bioimpedance analysis (BIA) using a Tanita BC418MA device from Tokyo, Japan. The validity of BIA-measured ALM was evaluated by comparing it to muscle mass measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a subset of UK Biobank participants, as previously reported, using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and a Bland–Altman plot [31]. ALM was calculated as the sum of muscle mass in the upper and lower limbs (UKB Field 23,113, 23,117, 23,121, and 23,125). To account for variations in body size, ALM was divided by height squared (ALM/H2, kg/m2) [1, 2]. Following the criteria set by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) [1], HGS was categorized into normal (≥ 27 kg for men; ≥ 16 kg for women) and low (< 27 kg for men; < 16 kg for women) groups, while ALM/H2 was categorized into normal (≥ 7 kg/m2 for men; ≥ 5 kg/m2 for women) and low (< 7 kg/m2 for men; < 5 kg/m2 for women) groups. According to the diagnostic criteria recommended by the EWGSOP2 [1], participants with low muscle strength in present study were defined as sarcopenia.

Covariates

Demographic information, including age (UKB Field 21,003), gender (UKB Field 31), height (UKB Field 50), and waist circumference (UKB Field 48), was collected during the initial assessment. To account for the small sample size of the underweight group, it was combined with the normal-weight group for the analysis. Smoking (UKB Field 20,116) and alcohol consumption status (UKB Field 20,117) were self-reported as “never,” “previously,” or “currently.” Physical activity (UKB Field 884) was assessed as the number of days per week of moderate physical activity lasting at least 10 min. Education scores (UKB Fields 26,414, 26,421, and 26,431) were self-reported. Ethnicity (UKB Field 21,000) was captured to reflect longitudinal variation in living experiences and categorized as White (including British, White, Irish, or any other White background), Black (including Black or Black British, White and Black Caribbean, White and Black African, African, Caribbean, or any other Black background), Asian (including Asian or Asian British, Chinese, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, or any other Asian background), or multiracial (including mixed, any other mixed background, or other ethnic groups). The Townsend Deprivation Index (UKB Field 189), calculated using the national census data, categorized participants into high (values below -2.08), middle (values ranging from -2.08 to 1.40), or low deprivation (values above 1.40) levels based on factors such as unemployment, vehicle ownership, household overcrowding, and occupation.

Statistical analysis

The participants were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of sarcopenia. In this study, we conducted Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests on all continuous variables, and the results indicated that they all met the assumption of normality (eTable 1, p values > 0.05). Therefore, statistical tests, including t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables, were employed for comparisons.

Multiple linear regression analysis [32, 33] was conducted to assess the relationship between circulating BCAAs (total BCAA, isoleucine, leucine, and valine) and sarcopenia-related traits (ALM/H2 was used for muscle mass and HGS for muscle strength). The estimated changes in ALM/H2 and HGS per unit increase in circulating BCAAs are represented by beta coefficients. Logistic regression analysis [34, 35] was performed to evaluate the impact of a one-unit increase in circulating BCAAs and quartiles of circulating BCAAs (using Q1 as the reference level) on sarcopenia risk, expressed as odds ratios (ORs). Appropriate measures were taken to account for influential confounding factors. Models 1 and 2 were utilized, with model 1 adjusted for age, gender, and BMI, and model 2 adjusted for confounding factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, ethnicity, education score, and Townsend Deprivation Index. The primary findings were derived from model 2. Prior to the regression analyses, a multicollinearity assessment was conducted for the independent variables in model 2, with a variance inflation factor (VIF) of < 2.5, indicating the absence of multicollinearity. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine potential variations in the associations between circulating BCAAs and ALM/H2, as well as HGS, across different subgroups defined by age (< 60 and ≥ 60 years, based on established criteria for defining an older person by the United Nations) and gender (male and female). In the sensitivity analysis, we excluded individuals with age-related chronic diseases (Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Osteoporosis, Arthritis, and Type 2 Diabetes) and reanalyzed the association between BCAAs concentrations (total BCAA, isoleucine, leucine, and valine) and muscle mass/strength. Finally, we conducted a mediation analysis [24] to investigate the potential mediating effect of muscle mass (ALM/H2) on the relationship between circulating BCAAs and muscle strength (HGS). Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and mediation analysis all adjusted for confounding factors in Model 2. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

The R software version 4.0.2 was utilized for analysis. The “stats” package was employed for multivariable linear regression and logistic regression analyses; the “mediation” package was used for causal mediation analysis; and the “forest plot” package was utilized for generating the forest plot.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Of the recruited 108,207 participants, 49,941 (46.23%) were men. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of participants was 56.40 (8.09) years. Compared with participants with non-sarcopenia, those with sarcopenia were more likely to be older, female, non-drinkers, less physically activity, highly educated, lower Townsend Deprivation Index and Asian. In our study, without adjusting for confounding factors, we observed higher levels of total BCAA, and leucine in the sarcopenia group than in the non-sarcopenia group (p values < 0.05). However, the two groups had no significant difference in the isoleucine and valine levels (p values > 0.05). Participants’ characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of participants
Full size table

Associations between BCAAs and sarcopenia-related traits

Our study demonstrated a positive association between all BCAAs and ALM/H2 in models 1 and 2 (Fig. 2). No significant multicollinearity was found among the covariates (VIF < 2.5, eTables 2–5). Every unit increase in circulating BCAAs corresponded to a significant increase in ALM/H2 by 0.56–2.53 kg/m2 (p < 0.05, Fig. 2a). The correlation between circulating BCAAs and ALM/H2 decreased in the following order: isoleucine, leucine, valine, and total BCAA (p < 0.05, Fig. 2a). Furthermore, inconsistent associations were observed between circulating BCAAs and HGS (p < 0.05, Fig. 2b). Total BCAA, leucine and valine were positively correlated, while isoleucine showed no insignificant correlation with HGS (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Associations between circulating BCAAs and ALM/H2 (a) and HGS (b). The estimated changes in ALM/H2 and HGS per unit increase in circulating BCAAs are represented by beta coefficients (95% CI). Model 1 was adjusted for age, gender, and waist circumference, and model 2 was additionally adjusted for confounding factors such as smoking status, alcohol consumption status, physical activity, ethnicity, education score, and Townsend Deprivation Index. The primary findings were derived from model 2. CI, confidence interval; total BCAA, total branched-chain amino acid; ALM/H2, appendicular lean mass divided by height squared; HGS, hand grip strength

Full size image

Moreover, we employed logistic regression to examine the impact of circulating BCAAs and BCAA concentration quartiles on the risk of sarcopenia (Fig. 3). Results revealed that only circulating valine consistently exhibits protective effects against sarcopenia. Each unit increase in circulating valine concentration was linked to a 47% decrease in the risk of sarcopenia (OR = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3–0.94, p = 0.029). Our study did not reveal a dose–response relationship between circulating valine levels and sarcopenia risk. As the valine concentration increased from Q2 to Q4, the risk of sarcopenia decreased by 6%, 8%, and 6%, respectively.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Associations of continuous BCAAs and quartiles of BCAAs with sarcopenia. Effect of a one-unit increase in circulating BCAAs (a) and the quartiles of circulating BCAAs (using Q1 as the reference level) (b) on sarcopenia risk, expressed as odds ratios (ORs). The model was adjusted for age, gender, waist circumference, smoking status, alcohol consumption status, physical activity, ethnicity, education score, and Townsend Deprivation Index. CI, confidence interval; BCAA, branched-chain amino acid

Full size image

Subgroup analyses

In the age-specific analyses, we observed a positive association between circulating BCAAs and ALM/H2 in age groups < 60 and ≥ 60 years (p < 0.05, eFigure 1a). However, there was a notable disparity in the associations between circulating BCAAs and HGS in age groups < 60 and ≥ 60 years (eFigure 1b). In the group aged ≥ 60 years, we found a positive correlation between circulating total BCAA, leucine, and valine and HGS, while no correlation was observed with isoleucine (eFigure 1b). In the group aged < 60 years, only leucine was found to be associated with HGS (eFigure 1b).

In the gender-specific analysis, our results indicated that the relationship between circulating BCAAs and ALM/H2, as well as HGS, in men, is consistent with that observed in the overall population (eFigure 2). However, we observed notable differences in the association between circulating BCAAs and sarcopenia-related traits, particularly HGS, in women compared to the overall population (eFigure 2b). Our study revealed a significant negative association between isoleucine levels and HGS in women (eFigure 2b). Additionally, we did not observe any association between circulating concentrations of total BCAA, leucine, valine and HGS in women (eFigure 2b).

Sensitivity analysis

The sensitivity analysis results demonstrate that after excluding individuals with age-related chronic diseases (Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Osteoporosis, Arthritis, and Type 2 Diabetes), the relationship between BCAAs concentrations and muscle mass/strength remains consistent with the results before exclusion (eFigure 3).

Mediation analysis

Figure 4 presents the theoretical framework and results of the mediation analysis. In Fig. 4a, the symbol “c” represents the total effect of BCAAs on muscle strength (HGS), “c'” represents the average direct effect (ADE) of BCAAs on muscle strength, and “a × b” represents the average causal mediation effect (ACME) of BCAAs on muscle strength through muscle mass (ALM/H2). In this study, mediation analysis revealed that muscle mass acted as a complete mediator in the relationship between total BCAA, valine and muscle strength (p values of total effect < 0.05, p values of ACME < 0.05, and p values of ADE > 0.05) (Fig. 4b). Additionally, our results suggested that muscle mass might acted as a partial mediator in the relationship between leucine and muscle strength (p values of total effect < 0.05, p values of ACME < 0.05, and p values of ADE < 0.05) (Fig. 4b). Although isoleucine did not exhibit a significant total effect on muscle strength (beta = -0.27, 95% CI = -2.66 to 1.95), it had a positive effect on muscle strength when mediated by muscle mass (ACME: beta = 2.43, 95% CI = 2.15–2.67, p < 0.001), while also having a direct negative effect on muscle strength (ACME: beta = -2.7, 95% CI = -4.96 to -0.45, p = 0.02) (Fig. 4b). Our findings indicated that muscle mass may obscure the true association between isoleucine intake and muscle strength.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Theoretical framework (a) and results (b) of the mediation analysis. In Fig. 4a, the symbol “c” represents the total effect of BCAAs on muscle strength (HGS), “c” represents the average direct effect (ADE) of BCAAs on muscle strength, and “a × b” represents the average causal mediation effect (ACME) of BCAAs on muscle strength through muscle mass (ALM/H2). In Fig. 4b, beta was adjusted for age, gender, waist circumference, smoking status, alcohol consumption status, physical activity, ethnicity, education score, and Townsend Deprivation Index. BCAAs, branched-chain amino acids; ALM/H2, appendicular lean mass divided by height squared; HGS, hand grip strength; CI, confidence interval

Full size image

Discussion

Using the largest-scale community-based cohort study, enrolling over 100,000 adults from the UK Biobank, we discovered significant associations between elevated levels of circulating BCAAs, including total BCAA, isoleucine, leucine, and valine, and increased muscle mass and strength. Furthermore, our findings revealed that higher circulating valine levels were linked to a reduced risk of sarcopenia; however, this relationship did not demonstrate a dose–response pattern. Subgroup analysis indicated that the association between circulating BCAA and muscle mass and strength was more prominent among men and individuals aged ≥ 60 years. Finally, our mediation analysis revealed novel findings, indicating that muscle mass potentially serves as a complete mediator in the pathway connecting total BCAA and valine to muscle strength. Additionally, it acts as a partial mediator in the pathway linking leucine to muscle strength and obscures the true effect of isoleucine on muscle strength.

The evidence from metabolomics study indicates a positive correlation between BCAAs and muscle mass in functionally limited older adults [15]. Furthermore, results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that BCAAs supplementation is beneficial for improving muscle mass in older adults [11]. This present study extends these findings to the middle-aged population (average age: 56 years), as we observed significant positive associations between total BCAAs, leucine, isoleucine, and valine with muscle mass. To elucidate these relationships, it has been postulated that overnight fasting leads to elevated serum BCAAs concentrations, which are proportional to the body's muscle mass [36]. BCAAs increase protein synthesis and decrease protein degradation in human muscles [7, 37]. BCAA supplementation can prevent the breakdown of proteins in skeletal muscles [8, 38]. However, the association between BCAA supplementation and grip strength remains controversial. Recent meta-analyses have yielded conflicting conclusions, with one suggesting that BCAA supplementation effectively enhanced grip strength in older adults and another indicating no improvement in grip strength among middle-aged to older adults. Our findings revealed positive associations between circulating BCAAs and grip strength; however, muscle mass likely influences or obscures this relationship. An adequate nutritional status is associated with maintaining muscle mass, which helps maintain muscle strength. These associations are cause-and-effect relationships that have been demonstrated in studies involving different populations [23, 39]. The underlying mechanism by which muscle mass mediates the association between BCAAs and muscle strength deserves more basic and clinical research.

In addition, the present study found that the association between circulating BCAAs and muscle mass and strength was significantly affected by gender and age. In the gender-stratified analysis, men showed a stronger association between circulating BCAAs and muscle mass (e.g., total BCAA, isoleucine, leucine, and valine) and strength (e.g., total BCAA, leucine, and valine) than women. Men were more likely to have greater skeletal muscle mass than women, and women tended to have a greater percentage of body fat than men, as confirmed by previous studies [40, 41]. The observed disparity in muscle mass between men and women can be attributed to several factors. First, higher levels of circulating androgens, particularly testosterone, are pivotal in promoting muscle protein synthesis and enhancing muscle growth [42, 43]. Second, men generally possess a greater proportion of type II muscle fibers [44], which is associated with increased muscle strength and hypertrophy. In the age-stratified analysis, we observed no significant difference in the association between circulating BCAA concentrations and muscle mass between the groups aged ≥ 60 and < 60 years. However, a notable disparity was evident in the association between circulating BCAAs and muscle strength between the two groups. Higher levels of circulating total BCAA, leucine, and valine were positively correlated with muscle strength in the group aged ≥ 60 years, while no association was found between any specific BCAA and muscle strength in the group aged < 60 years. Our results are consistent with those of a recent meta-analysis [11]. We speculated that the main reasons for this are as follows: First, aging is associated with a decline in anabolic hormone levels, such as testosterone [45], and growth hormone [46], which play crucial roles in muscle protein synthesis and maintenance. Consequently, older adults may excessively rely on alternative pathways for muscle protein synthesis, with BCAAs as important substrates. Second, older adults may experience greater muscle protein breakdown owing to factors such as chronic inflammation and oxidative stress [47], making the role of BCAAs in muscle maintenance and repair even more significant. In addition, the decline in physical activity levels and reduced muscle mass commonly observed with aging may lead to a higher reliance on BCAAs for muscle health. Collectively, these factors contribute to a stronger association between BCAAs and muscle mass and strength in older men than in younger women. However, further research is needed to fully elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

This study had several strengths. First, we used a large sample size to examine the association between circulating BCAA levels and muscle mass and strength, which enhanced the reliability of the study results. Second, by assessing circulating BCAA levels rather than relying on dietary BCAA concentrations, this study partly mitigated the influence of inter-individual variations in BCAA absorption and utilization, leading to more accurate and objective findings. Third, for the first time, our utilization of mediation analysis has underscored the crucial role of muscle mass in the association between BCAAs and muscle strength, thereby facilitating the discovery of a true relationship between BCAAs and muscle strength. However, this study had certain limitation. Although BCAAs are a group of essential amino acids that can only be obtained exogenously, the results of this study suggest the potential benefits of BCAA supplementation in improving muscle mass and strength. The study’s cross-sectional design precluded the establishment of a causal relationship between circulating BCAAs and muscle indices. Additionally, the smaller sample size in the sarcopenia group may impact the generalizability of our finding. Therefore, we performed rigorous statistical analyses, including subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses, to assess the robustness of our results. However, it is essential for future research to include a more balanced representation of participants across these categories to enhance the validity and generalizability of the conclusions drawn from such investigations.

This study, based on a cohort of nearly 100,000 individuals, revealed that higher levels of circulating BCAAs were associated with greater muscle mass and strength, particularly in men and adults aged ≥ 60 years. Furthermore, muscle mass may mediate or confound the true association between circulating BCAAs and muscle strength. Further prospective cohort studies, basic research, and clinical trials are needed to confirm the association between circulating BCAAs and muscle mass and strength. Additionally, these investigations should provide evidence for developing interventions and treatments for sarcopenia and other conditions contributing to a decline in muscle function.

Availability of data and materials

This study was conducted using the UK Biobank software. The UK Biobank is an open-access resource, and bonafide researchers can access the UK Biobank dataset by registering at https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/. Additional information is available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European working group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing. 2010;39(4):412–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yuan S, Larsson SC. Epidemiology of sarcopenia: prevalence, risk factors, and consequences. Metabolism. 2023;144:155533.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sayer AA, Cruz-Jentoft A. Sarcopenia definition, diagnosis and treatment: consensus is growing. Age Ageing. 2022;51(10):afac220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pere MC, Baudelin A, Briggs K, Teng C, Gilbert M. Hepatic amino acid metabolism during hyperinsulinemia and hyperaminoacidemia in conscious rabbit during late pregnancy. Metabolism. 1994;43(9):1079–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nishitani S, Ijichi C, Takehana K, Fujitani S, Sonaka I. Pharmacological activities of branched-chain amino acids: specificity of tissue and signal transduction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;313(2):387–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blomstrand E, Eliasson J, Karlsson HK, Kohnke R. Branched-chain amino acids activate key enzymes in protein synthesis after physical exercise. J Nutr. 2006;136(1 Suppl):269S-273S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eley HL, Russell ST, Tisdale MJ. Effect of branched-chain amino acids on muscle atrophy in cancer cachexia. Biochem J. 2007;407(1):113–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lv X, Zhou C, Yan Q, Tan Z, Kang J, Tang S. Elucidating the underlying mechanism of amino acids to regulate muscle protein synthesis: effect on human health. Nutrition. 2022;103–104:111797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitajima Y, Takahashi H, Akiyama T, Murayama K, Iwane S, Kuwashiro T, Tanaka K, Kawazoe S, Ono N, Eguchi T, et al. Supplementation with branched-chain amino acids ameliorates hypoalbuminemia, prevents sarcopenia, and reduces fat accumulation in the skeletal muscles of patients with liver cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(3):427–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bai GH, Tsai MC, Tsai HW, Chang CC, Hou WH. Effects of branched-chain amino acid-rich supplementation on EWGSOP2 criteria for sarcopenia in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nutr. 2022;61(2):637–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Manders RJ, Little JP, Forbes SC, Candow DG. Insulinotropic and muscle protein synthetic effects of branched-chain amino acids: potential therapy for type 2 diabetes and sarcopenia. Nutrients. 2012;4(11):1664–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ter Borg S, Luiking YC, van Helvoort A, Boirie Y, Schols J, de Groot C. Low levels of branched chain amino acids, eicosapentaenoic acid and micronutrients are associated with low muscle mass, strength and function in community-dwelling older adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(1):27–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fuchs CJ, Hermans WJH, Holwerda AM, Smeets JSJ, Senden JM, van Kranenburg J, Gijsen AP, Wodzig W, Schierbeek H, Verdijk LB, et al. Branched-chain amino acid and branched-chain ketoacid ingestion increases muscle protein synthesis rates in vivo in older adults: a double-blind, randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;110(4):862–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lustgarten MS, Price LL, Chale A, Phillips EM, Fielding RA. Branched chain amino acids are associated with muscle mass in functionally limited older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(6):717–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moaddel R, Fabbri E, Khadeer MA, Carlson OD, Gonzalez-Freire M, Zhang P, Semba RD, Ferrucci L. Plasma biomarkers of poor muscle quality in older men and women from the baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71(10):1266–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamada M, Kimura Y, Ishiyama D, Nishio N, Tanaka T, Ohji S, Otobe Y, Koyama S, Sato A, Suzuki M, et al. Plasma amino acid concentrations are associated with muscle function in older Japanese Women. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(7):819–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu Y, Karagounis LG, Ng TP, Carre C, Narang V, Wong G, Tan CTY, Zin Nyunt MS, Gao Q, Abel B, et al. Systemic and metabolic signature of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75(2):309–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng H, Kong J, Underwood C, Petocz P, Hirani V, Dawson B, O’Leary F. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of protein and amino acid supplements in older adults with acute or chronic conditions. Br J Nutr. 2018;119(5):527–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Komar B, Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G. Effects of leucine-rich protein supplements on anthropometric parameter and muscle strength in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr Health Aging. 2015;19(4):437–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hanach NI, McCullough F, Avery A. The impact of dairy protein intake on muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in middle-aged to older adults with or without existing sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutr. 2019;10(1):59–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ten Haaf DSM, Nuijten MAH, Maessen MFH, Horstman AMH, Eijsvogels TMH, Hopman MTE. Effects of protein supplementation on lean body mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in nonfrail community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108(5):1043–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Do JY, Kang SH. Sex difference in the association among nutrition, muscle mass, and strength in peritoneal dialysis patients. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):17900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, Beral V, Burton P, Danesh J, Downey P, Elliott P, Green J, Landray M, et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 2015;12(3):e1001779.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Soininen P, Kangas AJ, Wurtz P, Tukiainen T, Tynkkynen T, Laatikainen R, Jarvelin MR, Kahonen M, Lehtimaki T, Viikari J, et al. High-throughput serum NMR metabonomics for cost-effective holistic studies on systemic metabolism. Analyst. 2009;134(9):1781–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wurtz P, Kangas AJ, Soininen P, Lawlor DA, Davey Smith G, Ala-Korpela M. Quantitative serum nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics in large-scale epidemiology: a primer on -omic technologies. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(9):1084–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Soininen P, Kangas AJ, Wurtz P, Suna T, Ala-Korpela M. Quantitative serum nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics in cardiovascular epidemiology and genetics. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015;8(1):192–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang X, Hu W, Wang Y, Wang W, Liao H, Zhang X, Kiburg KV, Shang X, Bulloch G, Huang Y, et al. Plasma metabolomic profiles of dementia: a prospective study of 110,655 participants in the UK Biobank. Bmc Med. 2022;20(1):252.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Baumgartner RN, Ross R. Estimation of skeletal muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(2):465–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Petermann-Rocha F, Gray SR, Pell JP, Ho FK, Celis-Morales C. The joint association of sarcopenia and frailty with incidence and mortality health outcomes: a prospective study. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(4):2427–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rath S, Tripathy A, Tripathy AR. Prediction of new active cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic using multiple linear regression model. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(5):1467–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Krzywinski M, Altman N. Multiple linear regression. Nat Methods. 2015;12(12):1103–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Zoccali C. Linear and logistic regression analysis. Kidney Int. 2008;73(7):806–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Henrard S, Speybroeck N, Hermans C. Classification and regression tree analysis vs. multivariable linear and logistic regression methods as statistical tools for studying haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2015;21(6):715–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tom A, Nair KS. Assessment of branched-chain amino acid status and potential for biomarkers. J Nutr. 2006;136(1 Suppl):324S-330S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Norton LE, Layman DK. Leucine regulates translation initiation of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle after exercise. J Nutr. 2006;136(2):533S-537S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Busquets S, Alvarez B, Llovera M, Agell N, Lopez-Soriano FJ, Argiles JM. Branched-chain amino acids inhibit proteolysis in rat skeletal muscle: mechanisms involved. J Cell Physiol. 2000;184(3):380–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Frontera WR, Hughes VA, Lutz KJ. Evans WJ: A cross-sectional study of muscle strength and mass in 45- to 78-yr-old men and women. J Appl Physiol. 1991;71(2):644–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Abe T, Kearns CF, Fukunaga T. Sex differences in whole body skeletal muscle mass measured by magnetic resonance imaging and its distribution in young Japanese adults. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(5):436–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang ZM, Ross R. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000;89(1):81–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bhasin S, Storer TW, Berman N, Callegari C, Clevenger B, Phillips J, Bunnell TJ, Tricker R, Shirazi A, Casaburi R. The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(1):1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Griggs RC, Kingston W, Jozefowicz RF, Herr BE, Forbes G, Halliday D. Effect of testosterone on muscle mass and muscle protein synthesis. J Appl Physiol. 1989;66(1):498–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Haizlip KM, Harrison BC, Leinwand LA. Sex-based differences in skeletal muscle kinetics and fiber-type composition. Physiology (Bethesda). 2015;30(1):30–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lisco G, Giagulli VA, De Tullio A, De Pergola G, Guastamacchia E, Triggiani V. Age-related male hypogonadism and cognitive impairment in the elderly: focus on the effects of testosterone replacement therapy on cognition. Geriatrics (Basel). 2020;5(4):76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bartke A. Growth hormone and aging: updated review. World J Mens Health. 2019;37(1):19–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ferrucci L, Fabbri E. Inflammageing: chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(9):505–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the associated researchers of the UK Biobank.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Henan Province Medical Science and Technology Joint Construction Project (LHGJ20230193); the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC131400, 2018YFC1314403); and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 82001290).

Author information

Author notes

  1. HuiMin Liu, Qiang Zhang and QianMeng Hao contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China

    HuiMin Liu, QingSheng Li, LingFei Yang, Xuan Yang, KaiXin Wang, JunFang Teng, Zhe Gong & YanJie Jia

  2. School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, High-Tech Development Zone of States, 101 Kexue Road, Zhengzhou, NO, China

    Qiang Zhang

  3. Department of Blood Transfusion, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450053, Henan, China

    QianMeng Hao

Authors
  1. HuiMin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qiang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. QianMeng Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. QingSheng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. LingFei Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xuan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. KaiXin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. JunFang Teng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zhe Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. YanJie Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.M.L conducted research, analyzed data or performed statistical analysis, and wrote paper. Q.Z conducted research and provided essential reagents, or provided essential materials. Q.M.H conducted research and wrote paper, Q.S.L, L.F.Y, X.Y, K.X.W, and J.F.T paper editing of final version of the manuscript. Z.G and J.Y.J contributed designed research and had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhe Gong or YanJie Jia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the North-west Multicenter Research Ethics Committee. All participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, H., Zhang, Q., Hao, Q. et al. Associations between sarcopenia and circulating branched-chain amino acids: a cross-sectional study over 100,000 participants. BMC Geriatr 24, 541 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05144-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05144-5

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us