Skip to main content

Utilize multi-metabolic parameters as determinants for prediction of skeletal muscle mass quality in elderly type2 diabetic Chinese patients

Abstract

Background

Sarcopenia, an age-related disorder characterized by loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, is recently recognized as a complication in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Skeletal muscles play a crucial role in glycemic metabolism, utilizing around 80% of blood glucose. Accordingly, we aimed to explore the relationship between glucose metabolism and muscle mass in T2DM.

Methods

We employed the AWGS 2019 criteria for diagnosing low muscle mass and 1999 World Health Organization (WHO) diabetes diagnostic standards. This study included data of 191 individuals aged 60 and above with T2DM of Shanghai Pudong Hospital from November 2021 to November 2022. Fasting C-peptide (FPCP), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) and postprandial 2-hour C-peptide (PPCP), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), glycated albumin (GA), serum lipids spectrum, renal and hepatic function, hemoglobin, and hormone were measured. Based on the findings of univariate analysis, logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were established.

Results

Participants with low muscle mass had significantly lower alanine and aspartate aminotransferase, and both FPCP and PPCP levels (P < 0.05). Compared with those without low muscle mass, low muscle mass group had significantly higher FPG, HbA1c, GA levels (P < 0.05). Body fat (BF, OR = 1.181) was an independent risk factor for low muscle mass. PPCP (OR = 0.497), BMI (OR = 0.548), and female (OR = 0.050) were identified as protective factors for low skeletal muscle. The AUC of BMI was the highest, followed by the PPCP, gender and BF (0.810, 0.675, 0.647, and 0.639, respectively), and the AUC of the combination of the above four parameters reached 0.895.

Conclusions

In this cross-sectional study, BMI, Female, and PPCP associated with T2DM were protective factors for low muscle mass. BF was associated with T2DM and risk factor for low muscle mass.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The term “sarcopenia” was first coined by Rosenberg in 1989 to describe the condition of muscle atrophy in elderly individuals, primarily referring to the age-related decline in skeletal muscle mass [1]. Besides implement of various movements through joint contractions, muscles also serve as a major site for glucose metabolism, utilizing about 80% of overall systemic glucose by glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4), and playing a crucial role in blood glucose control [2, 3]. Research indicate that diabetes patients exhibit lower skeletal muscle index values [4], and the risk of developing muscle loss (sarcopenia) in type 2 diabetes patients is 1.5-2 times higher than in non-diabetic individuals [5]. A meta-analysis study based on Asian populations reveals that the prevalence of sarcopenia in diabetes patients is 15.9%, compared to 0.8% in non-diabetic individuals [6].. Currently, sarcopenia is recognized as a new complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [7], not only leading to a decrease in the quality of life but also increasing the risk of physical disability and even death [8, 9].

In two longitudinal studies conducted in South Korea and Japan, it has been consistently demonstrated that elevated blood glucose levels, represented by HbA1c, are associated with low muscle mass in elderly diabetic patients [10, 11] Indeed, some scholars posit that skeletal muscle mass can serve as a predictive indicator for the deterioration of glucose metabolism [10, 12]. The existence of these potential correlations has indeed opened a new frontier in understanding blood glucose homeostasis in the elderly. Consequently, we focused on the glycemic status in elderly individuals with T2DM, and in order to elucidate the relationship between skeletal muscle and blood glucose metabolism.

Materials and methods

Study participants

We conducted a study on 657 Chinese elderly individuals aged 60 and above who were diagnosed with T2DM and admitted to Fudan University Shanghai Pudong Hospital between November 2021 and November 2022.The T2D diagnosis made using World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines published in 1999 [13]. Patients with acute diabetic complication and other acute systemic diseases (such as Diabetic Ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar nonketotic diabetic coma, acute hepatic insufficiency and acute renal insufficiency), conditions affecting body composition or muscle mass (Such as disability, cancer, thyroid disease, and chronic hepatic insufficiency),mental or cognitive impairment were excluded from the study, as well as the incomplete data, resulting in inclusion a total of 191 elderly patients, who were diagnosed with low muscle mass (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the participants inclusion and exclusion in the study. The diagram shows how patients were included and excluded from the target population. A total of 191 patients were finally enrolled in this study. DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Assessment of low muscle mass

Muscle mass was assessed using lean mass, excluding bone mineral content (BMC), obtained from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examination. In previous research, lean mass has been shown valid in represent skeletal muscle mass in the extremities [14].In our study, each participant underwent a whole-body DXA (Hologic, ASY-00409, USA) scan administered by a certified medical radiation therapist. The indicators for collection include appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM), upper limb skeletal muscle mass, lower limb skeletal muscle mass, trunk skeletal muscle mass, and body fat mass. According to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) consensus (2019) diagnostic criteria [15], appendicular skeletal muscle mass index( ASMI, ASM/height2): when men < 7.0 kg/m2; women < 5.7 kg/m2, then supported the diagnosis of low muscle mass. Upper Limb Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI-Upper) = Upper Limb Skeletal Muscle Mass (kg) / Height² (m²); Lower Limb Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI-Lower) = Lower Limb Skeletal Muscle Mass (kg) / Height² (m²); SMI-Total, total skeletal muscle index = Total Skeletal Muscle Mass (kg) / Height² (m²).

Laboratory measurements

Following admission, professionally trained researchers will measure and gather personal information about the participants. This will include details such as BMI, age, gender, duration of diabetes, smoking and drinking history, medication history, and past medical history. Except for PPCP and PPG, which were measured using elbow venous blood 2 h after a meal, other biochemical indicators were measured using fasting elbow venous blood on the second day after admission.

HOMA-IR and HOMA-β are established metrics extensively employed in clinical practice to evaluate insulin resistance and pancreatic β-cell function in individuals with diabetes. Recognizing that some participants in this study were undergoing insulin therapy for glycemic control, we computed the HOMA index utilizing fasting C-peptide through the following formula.

HOMA index: HOMA-IR = 1.5 + fasting blood glucose × fasting C-peptide/2800; HOMA-β= × fasting C-peptide/(fasting blood glucose-3.5), (C-peptide: pmol/L; blood glucose: mmol/L) [16].

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS (IBM, version 26.0) and prism (GraphPad, version 9.0). Measurement data of continuous variables are presented as the mean ± SD (standard deviation), and categorical variables are expressed as frequencies with percentages. The demographic and clinical data of the T2DM patients with and without low muscle mass were compared using the Mann-Whitney test, an independent t-test, and a chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the low muscle mass. Spearman correlation analysis was also established to identify the relationship between skeletal muscle mass and biochemical markers. Variables with statistical differences between groups were selected for the multivariate regression and spearman correlation. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

General clinical and basic laboratory characteristics

The general clinical and basic laboratory characteristics of the 191 participants with and without low muscle mass enrolled in this study are shown in Tables 1 and 2. 54 (61.4%) male and 34 (38.6%) female participants had low muscle mass, but there were no differences in age, WHR, Duration of diabetes, blood pressure, past medical history (anti-diabetic medication, insulin), Diabetic complications (Arteriosclerosis, Diabetic peripheral neuropathy, Diabetic nephropathy, or Diabetic retinopathy) between the two groups. Nevertheless, participants with low muscle mass were more likely to be male, smokers, and alcohol consumers, and they also had higher weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), Body Fat (BF), and ASMI than those without low muscle mass (p < 0.05). (Table 1)

Table 1 General clinical characteristics of the cohort that was classified according to appendicular skeletal muscle mass

Compared with those without low muscle mass, those with low muscle mass had lower AST and ALT(p < 0.05). Simultaneously, there were no differences observed between the low muscle mass group and the non-low muscle mass group in terms of HB, lipid metabolism, thyroid function, liver function, kidney function, as well as levels of vitamins and trace elements. (Table 2).

Table 2 Basic laboratory characteristics of the cohort that was classified according to appendicular skeletal muscle mass

Characteristics of glucose metabolism

Participants with low muscle mass demonstrated notably diminished levels of HOMA-β (P < 0.001) and PPCP(P < 0.0001) in contrast to their counterparts with normal muscle mass. Moreover, FPCP was marginally lower in the low muscle mass group compared to the normal muscle mass group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the low muscle mass cohort exhibited elevated levels of FPG(P < 0.01), HbA1c(P < 0.05), and GA(P < 0.05) relative to the normal muscle mass cohort. Regrettably, despite a slightly higher PPG and HOMA-IR in the low muscle mass group compared to the normal muscle mass group, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. (P > 0.05) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

delineates the glucose metabolism characteristics in two cohorts. FPCP, fasting C-peptide; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; GA, Glycated Albumin; PPG,2-hour postprandial plasma glucose; PPCP, postprandial 2-hour C-peptide. Note *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001

Associations between muscle mass and glucose metabolism in male participants with T2DM

We performed Spearman correlation analysis to determine the correlations between muscle mass and glucose metabolism variables of T2DM. The correlation analyses between a glucose metabolism variables and muscle mass in male participants are shown in Fig. 3A.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The heatmap shows the correlational relationship between the muscle mass and glucose metabolism parameters in male and female participants. The degree of the gradient in red represents the degree of positive correlation, and the blue represents the degree of negative correlation. FPCP, fasting C-peptide; PPCP, postprandial 2-hour C-peptide; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; PPG,2-hour postprandial plasma glucose; GA, Glycated Albumin; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; SMI-Upper, upper limb skeletal muscle index; SMI-Lower, lower limb skeletal muscle index; ASMI, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index; SMI-Total, total skeletal muscle index

We found that SMI-Upper (r = − 0.259, P = 0.018) and SMI-Lower (r = − 0.222, P = 0.018) was negatively correlated with HbA1c among male participants.; ASMI positively correlated with HOMA-β (r = 0.269, P = 0.013), FPCP (r = 0.253, P = 0.019), PPCP (r = 0.220, P = 0.043), but negatively correlated with HbA1c (r = − 0.265, P = 0.014) among male participants.

SMI-Total positively correlated with HOMA-β (r = 0.214, P = 0.049), but negatively correlated with HbA1c (r = − 0.235, P = 0.030) and GA (r = − 0.219, P = 0.044) among male participants.

Associations between muscle mass and glucose metabolism in female participants with T2DM

We performed Spearman correlation analysis to determine the correlations between muscle mass and glucose metabolism variables of T2DM. The correlation analyses between a glucose metabolism variables and muscle mass in female participants are shown in Fig. 3B.

We found that SMI-Upper (r = 0.223, P = 0.023;r = 0.258, P = 0.008)and ASMI (r = 0.196, P = 0.046; r = 0.250, P = 0.010) were positively correlated with FPCP and PPCP among female participants; SMI-Lower positively correlated with PPCP(r = 0.244, P = 0.013); SMI-Total positively correlated with HOMA-β (r = 0.215, P = 0.028)and FPCP(r = 0.255, P = 0.009).

Logistic regression of biochemical parameters and low muscle mass

We used binary logistic regression analysis with backward deletion to identify the optimal subset. We included all variables with statistically significant results (whose p-value is < 0.05) in the univariate analysis. (Fig. 4A) We finally got the optimal subset, we found that BF (OR = 1.181, [95% CI: 1.042–1.338] P = 0.009) was identified as risk factor for low skeletal muscle, BMI (OR = 0.548, [95% CI: 0.423–0.709] P = 0.000), PPCP(OR = 0.497, [95% CI: 0.273–0.905] P = 0.022) and Female (OR = 0.009, [95% CI: 0.050–0.282] P = 0.001) were identified as protective factors for low skeletal muscle. (Fig. 4B)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Factors associated with low muscle mass in T2DM; (A) Binary logistic regression analysis with stepwise backward deletion (all variables); (B) Binary logistic regression analysis with stepwise backward deletion (the optimal subset); GA, Glycated Albumin; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; PPCP, postprandial 2-hour C-peptide; FPCP, fasting C-peptide; BF, body fat (%); BMI, body mass index; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase

The predictive value of parameters for muscle mass

We established receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and assessed the diagnostic performance of the indicators reflecting the low muscle mass in the Elderly T2DM cohort by the area under the curve (AUC). BMI had the best diagnostic performance AUC = 0.810 [95% CI: 0.748–0.871], followed by PPCP AUC = 0.675 [95% CI: 0.599– 0.751], gender AUC = 0.647 [95% CI: 0.568–0.725], and BF AUC = 0.639 [95% CI: 0.561–0.717]. The result of optimal cut-off point calculated by Youden Index. Cut-off point, sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of BF are 34.75, 68.2%, 56.3% and 24.5%, respectively.; Cut-off point, sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of BMI are 25.67, 79.5%, 70.9% and 50.4%, respectively; Cut-off point, sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of PPCP are 0.985, 74.4%, 53.4% and 27.8%, respectively;

After that, we used logistic regression analysis and the results specified that the four parameters performed better in combination for prediction. [AUC = 0.895,95% CI: 0.851– 0.939] (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Receiver operating characteristic curves of different indicators in skeletal muscle mass. The black arrow indicates the optimal point on the ROC curve. BF, body fat (%); BMI, body mass index; PPCP, postprandial 2-hour C-peptide

Discussion

Poor glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes was reported to be a risk factor for sarcopenia [17]. In our study, we first identified some parameters related to low muscle mass among elderly Chinese participants with T2DM and found that participants with low muscle mass a had significantly lower BMI, BF, ASMI, HOMA-β,ALT,AST, FPCP and PPCP concentrations (P < 0.0001 for PPCP; P < 0.05 for ALT,AST and FPCP; P < 0.001 for BMI, BF, ASMI, and HOMA-β;). In the study conducted by Merchant RA and colleagues, it was indicated that a lower BMI is associated with a higher risk of developing sarcopenia [18]. A previous study conducted on a Chinese female population aged over 50 also indicated that individuals with low muscle mass had lower BMI,ALT levels, consistent with our findings [19]. In a longitudinal cross-sectional study spanning three years in China, it was indicated that there is an association between fasting plasma C-peptide levels and the likelihood of sarcopenia [20]. Inhibition of protein synthesis in patients with diabetic sarcopenia is mediated by inhibition of the IGF1-PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway [21]. There is evidence to indicate that C-peptide may interact synergistically with the insulin signaling pathway [22]. However, as of now, there is no existing research on the correlation between PPCP and sarcopenia. We are incorporating PPCP into our study to explore potential associations.

Meanwhile, compared with those without low muscle mass, those with low muscle mass had significantly higher female, Ever/current smoking, Ever/current drinking, FPG(P < 0.01), HbA1c(P < 0.05), and GA(P < 0.05) concentration (P < 0.001 for gender; P = 0.013 for Ever/current smoking; P = 0.005 for Ever/current drinking; P < 0.01 for FPG; P < 0.01 for HbA1c, GA). Some studies indicate a higher prevalence of sarcopenia in elderly male patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), [23, 24] consistent with the findings of our study. Testosterone plays a crucial role in promoting muscle protein synthesis and maintaining muscle mass and function [25]. The skeletal muscle, being the primary organ with glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4), accounts for approximately 80% of the glucose clearance rate [26, 27]. A reduction in muscle mass can induce insulin resistance (IR), leading to compensatory hyperinsulinemia, downregulation of glycogen synthesis, and subsequent elevation of blood glucose levels [28, 29]. Numerous studies have described the vicious effects of smoking on skeletal muscle function and morphology, especially, the thigh muscles [30]. The partial consequence is degeneration in muscle fatigue resistance [31] associated with compromised muscle oxidative capacity [32], and a transition from slow twitch to fast twitch fiber type [33]. Furthermore, smoking could promote skeletal muscle wasting via smoking-induced inflammation that facilitate protein breakdown and suppress protein synthesis [34]. The presence of ethanol has been demonstrated to interfere in muscle with total, microsomal, and mitochondrial protein synthesis, ATPase activity, and substrate oxidation [35,36,37].

We employed Binary Logistic Regression Analysis with stepwise backward deletion to identify the optimal subset that PPCP(OR = 0.497), BMI (OR = 0.548), and female (OR = 0.009) were independent protective factors for low muscle mass in female sarcopenia, but BF(OR = 1.181) was independent risk factors.

Meanwhile, based on the findings of univariate and logistic analysis, we also established ROCs to identify parameters that reflect skeletal muscle mass in the elderly T2DM cohort and found that the AUC of BMI was the highest, followed by PPCP, gender and BF (0.810, 0.675,0.647, and 0.639, respectively), and the AUC of the mixture of the above four reached 0.895.Additionally, we further stratified the analysis by gender, investigating the impact of Skeletal Muscle Mass Index at different sites on glucose metabolism.

In previous studies, patients with sarcopenia exhibited lower insulin levels [10, 19]. In our study, considering the potential impact of insulin therapy on insulin levels, we innovatively utilized C-peptide as a research parameter, circumventing the influence of medication. Our study also indicates lower C-peptide levels in patients with low muscle mass in T2DM. This may be related to the fact that C-peptide exerts an important protective effect against death signaling in myoblasts [38]. We have refined the glucose metabolism in the elderly population with T2DM and have identified a convenient and practical diagnostic tool for assessing low muscle mass. But our study also has limitations, as a cross-sectional study, the causality of this relationship cannot be determined, so further research is needed.

Conclusion

In this cross-sectional study of elderly Chinese T2DM aged over 60 years, BMI, female and PPCP were associated with T2DM and protective factors for low muscle mass, BF was identified as risk factor for low skeletal muscle.

Data availability

The data-set generated and analyzed during the current study will be available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

Abbreviations

T2DM:

type 2 diabetes mellitus

References

  1. Rosenberg IH. Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. J Nutr. 1997;127(5 Suppl):990S–1S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sylow L, Tokarz VL, Richter EA, Klip A. The many actions of insulin in skeletal muscle, the paramount tissue determining glycemia. Cell Metab. 2021;33(4):758–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang S, Czech MP. The GLUT4 glucose transporter. Cell Metab. 2007;5(4):237–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim TN, Park MS, Yang SJ, Yoo HJ, Kang HJ, Song W, et al. Prevalence and determinant factors of Sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Korean sarcopenic obesity study (KSOS). Diabetes Care. 2010;33(7):1497–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Izzo A, Massimino E, Riccardi G, Della Pepa G. A narrative review on Sarcopenia in type 2 diabetes Mellitus: Prevalence and Associated factors. Nutrients. 2021;13(1).

  6. Chung SM, Moon JS, Chang MC. Prevalence of Sarcopenia and its Association with diabetes: a Meta-analysis of Community-Dwelling Asian Population. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:681232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liccini A, Malmstrom TK. Frailty and Sarcopenia as predictors of adverse health outcomes in persons with diabetes Mellitus. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(9):846–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawada T. Mortality risk of Sarcopenia in older subjects. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;22(9):1883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Takahashi F, Hashimoto Y, Kaji A, Sakai R, Okamura T, Kitagawa N, et al. Sarcopenia is Associated with a risk of mortality in people with type 2 diabetes Mellitus. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:783363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sugimoto K, Ikegami H, Takata Y, Katsuya T, Fukuda M, Akasaka H, et al. Glycemic control and Insulin Improve Muscle Mass and Gait Speed in Type 2 diabetes: the MUSCLES-DM Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;22(4):834–8e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoon JW, Ha YC, Kim KM, Moon JH, Choi SH, Lim S, et al. Hyperglycemia is Associated with impaired muscle quality in older men with diabetes: the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging. Diabetes Metab J. 2016;40(2):140–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lopez Teros MT, Ramirez CF, Aleman-Mateo H. Hyperinsulinemia is associated with the loss of appendicular skeletal muscle mass at 4.6 year follow-up in older men and women. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(5):931–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications: report of a WHO consultation. Part 1. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus [M]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Visser M, Fuerst T, Lang T, Salamone L, Harris TB. Validity of fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measuring fat-free mass and leg muscle mass. Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study–Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Body Composition Working Group. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999;87(4):1513-20.

  15. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA, Sarcopenia. Lancet. 2019;393(10191):2636–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lv Y, Zheng Y, Zhao X, Li Z, Wang G. The relationship between islet beta-cell function and metabolomics in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. Biosci Rep. 2023;43(2).

  17. Bouchi R, Fukuda T, Takeuchi T, Nakano Y, Murakami M, Minami I, et al. Insulin treatment attenuates decline of muscle Mass in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Calcif Tissue Int. 2017;101(1):1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Merchant RA, Seetharaman S, Au L, Wong MWK, Wong BLL, Tan LF, et al. Relationship of Fat Mass Index and Fat Free Mass Index with Body Mass Index and Association with function, cognition and Sarcopenia in Pre-frail older adults. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:765415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yin M, Zhang H, Liu Q, Ding F, Hou L, Deng Y, et al. Determination of skeletal muscle mass by aspartate aminotransferase / alanine aminotransferase ratio, insulin and FSH in Chinese women with Sarcopenia. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen MJ, Leng J, Ni JP, Xiong AL, Hu MY. U-shaped association between plasma C-peptide and sarcopenia: a cross-sectional study of elderly Chinese patients with diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(10):e0292654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Giha HA, Alamin OAO, Sater MS. Diabetic Sarcopenia: metabolic and molecular appraisal. Acta Diabetol. 2022;59(8):989–1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wahren J, Kallas A, Sima AA. The clinical potential of C-peptide replacement in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2012;61(4):761–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. de Freitas MM, de Oliveira VLP, Grassi T, Valduga K, Miller MEP, Schuchmann RA, et al. Difference in Sarcopenia prevalence and associated factors according to 2010 and 2018 European consensus (EWGSOP) in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exp Gerontol. 2020;132:110835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sazlina SG, Lee PY, Chan YM, MS AH, Tan NC. The prevalence and factors associated with sarcopenia among community living elderly with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care clinics in Malaysia. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(5):e0233299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bhasin S, Storer TW, Berman N, Callegari C, Clevenger B, Phillips J, et al. The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(1):1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Son JW, Lee SS, Kim SR, Yoo SJ, Cha BY, Son HY, et al. Low muscle mass and risk of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and older adults: findings from the KoGES. Diabetologia. 2017;60(5):865–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu H, Liu M, Chi VTQ, Wang J, Zhang Q, Liu L, et al. Handgrip strength is inversely associated with metabolic syndrome and its separate components in middle aged and older adults: a large-scale population-based study. Metabolism. 2019;93:61–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cleasby ME, Jamieson PM, Atherton PJ. Insulin resistance and sarcopenia: mechanistic links between common co-morbidities. J Endocrinol. 2016;229(2):R67–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nishikawa H, Fukunishi S, Asai A, Yokohama K, Ohama H, Nishiguchi S et al. Sarcopenia, frailty and type 2 diabetes mellitus (review). Mol Med Rep. 2021;24(6).

  30. Larsson L, Orlander J. Skeletal muscle morphology, metabolism and function in smokers and non-smokers. A study on smoking-discordant monozygous twins. Acta Physiol Scand. 1984;120(3):343–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wust RC, Morse CI, de Haan A, Rittweger J, Jones DA, Degens H. Skeletal muscle properties and fatigue resistance in relation to smoking history. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;104(1):103–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Degens H, Veerkamp JH. Changes in oxidative capacity and fatigue resistance in skeletal muscle. Int J Biochem. 1994;26(7):871–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Orlander J, Kiessling KH, Larsson L. Skeletal muscle metabolism, morphology and function in sedentary smokers and nonsmokers. Acta Physiol Scand. 1979;107(1):39–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Degens H, Gayan-Ramirez G, van Hees HW. Smoking-induced skeletal muscle dysfunction: from evidence to mechanisms. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(6):620–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rubin E. Alcoholic myopathy in heart and skeletal muscle. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(1):28–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rubin E, Katz AM, Lieber CS, Stein EP, Puszkin S. Muscle damage produced by chronic alcohol consumption. Am J Pathol. 1976;83(3):499–516.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Preedy VR, Peters TJ. Alcohol and muscle disease. J R Soc Med. 1994;87(4):188–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Essid SM, Bevington A, Brunskill NJ. Proinsulin C-Peptide enhances cell survival and protects against Simvastatin-Induced myotoxicity in L6 rat myoblasts. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(7).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We also thank all staff involved in this study for their painstaking efforts in conducting the data collection.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(82100850), the Project of Key Medical Specialty of Pudong Hospital of Fudan University (No Tszb2023-14) and Scientific Program of Shanghai Pudong Hospital (YJRCJJ201808), The Pudong New Area Clinical Characteristic Discipline Project (No.PWYts2021-01), Clinical research program of Health Industry of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health(202150002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HC contributed to conceptualization, data collection, data curation, data analysis and manuscript writing. QL, MD, XL and SJ contributed to data collection, data curation. XY and XD made substantial contributions to study design and manuscript revision. SW was responsible for data acquisition. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xingdang Liu or Xinlu Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants were willing to take part in this study, and informed consent was signed. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University. [(2022)No.(WZ-24)]. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Lou, J., Dong, M. et al. Utilize multi-metabolic parameters as determinants for prediction of skeletal muscle mass quality in elderly type2 diabetic Chinese patients. BMC Geriatr 24, 325 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04827-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04827-3

Keywords