Skip to main content

Navigating Aged Care Services with GIS: Trends, Developments, and Future Directions

Abstract

Background

With the growing challenge of an aging population, emerging technologies are increasingly being integrated into the production, organization, and delivery of aged care services. Geographic Information System (GIS), a computer-based tool for spatial information analysis and processing, has made significant strides in the allocation of care recources and service delivery for older adults, a notably vulnerable group. Despite its growing importance, cross-disciplinary literature reviews on this theme are scare. This scoping review was conducted to encapsulate the advancements and discern the future trajectory of GIS applications in aged care services.

Methods

A comprehensive search across nine databases yielded 5941 articles. Adhering to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, 61 articles were selected for a detailed analysis.

Results

The 61 articles span from 2003 to 2022, with a notable increase in publications since 2018, comprising 41 articles (67% of the total) published between 2018-2022. Developed countries contributed 66% of the papers, with 45% focusing on accessibility issues. In the domain of aged care services, GIS has been predominantly utilized for model construction, mapping, and site selection, with a growing emphasis on addressing the unique needs of different subgroups of older adults.

Conclusion

The past two decades have seen substantial growth in the application of GIS in aged care services, reflecting its increasing importance in this field. This scoping review not only charts the historical development of GIS applications in aged care services but also underscores the need for innovative research approaches. Future directions should emphasize the integration of GIS with diverse methodologies to address the heterogeneous needs of older adults and improve the overall delivery of aged care services. Such advancements in GIS applications have the potential to significantly enhance the efficiency, accessibility, and quality of care for the aging population.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

In the context of burgeoning global economic development, the phenomenon of an aging population is increasingly prominent. It is projected that the world's population will surpass the eight billion mark by November 15, 2022. A noteworthy trend in global demographics is the rise in life expectancy, which reached an average of 72.8 years in 2019, marking an approximate increase of nine years since 1990. This upward trajectory is expected to continue, with projections suggesting an average global longevity of 77.2 years by 2050 [1]. This increase in life expectancy can be attributed to a confluence of factors, including a worldwide decrease in birth rates, advancements in medical technology, and overall societal progress. These factors have not only contributed to extended human life spans but also led to significant shifts in mortality rates and demographic patterns, thereby influencing various facets of global society. In light of these changes, there is a pressing need to focus comprehensively on the healthcare, social security, and emotional well-being of the elderly. This demographic shift calls for a global response, urging nations to address the health requirements of their aging populations. Despite the increase in longevity, the question arises: are the needs for aged care services being adequately met? In response to this critical societal challenge, governments across the world are taking proactive measures. They are formulating and implementing policies aimed at safeguarding the lives of the elderly and fulfilling their diverse needs, thereby ensuring their well-being in the later stages of life.

The spectrum of care services for the elderly encompasses both physical and mental well-being. Ensuring access to comprehensive healthcare services is crucial for maintaining healthy lifestyles among older adults [2]. Care services for this demographic are distinct and more specialized compared to those for younger populations. Given their often-diminished physical robustness, the lifestyle and mental health needs of the elderly differ markedly from those of younger adults. However, there is a notable gap in the existing literature pertaining to care services, with insufficient attention to the multifaceted nature of aged care. A segment of research focuses primarily on the physical health aspects of the elderly, such as oral health, advocating for an expansion in geriatric dental services to meet growing demands [3]. In contrast, other studies emphasize the logistical aspects of accessing aged care services, including the influence of public transport's accessibility and reliability on seniors' ability to reach medical facilities. This diversity of focus highlights the complexity inherent in defining care services for the elderly. Consequently, this paper adopts a broader perspective, encompassing health care, housing, nutrition, and psychological support as integral components of elderly care. Additionally, it addresses factors that directly impact seniors' access to these services, such as the availability of transportation, thereby acknowledging the comprehensive nature of care requirements in older age.

In the realm of aged care services research, the application of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for analysis and evaluation has garnered attention. Initially proposed by Roger Tomlinson in 1963 [4], GIS technology has undergone significant evolution and found widespread application across various disciplines over the decades. The past fifty years have witnessed remarkable advancements in GIS research, showcasing its potential value in diverse fields and its emergence as a crucial technology in everyday human life. One key area where GIS has shown its utility is in understanding the spatial distribution of medical resources and its correlation with accessibility and availability [5]. The well-being of older adults is closely linked to the availability of healthcare resources, and the spatial distribution of these resources directly influences the distribution of public welfare [6].

The integration of GIS in healthcare has revolutionized the measurement of spatial access to healthcare services [7], enabling more efficient calculation of resource allocation. With advancements in computing technology, GIS techniques have been increasingly used to develop optimal solutions for allocation challenges. These methods are continuously evolving [8,9,10,11], aligning more closely with research needs and societal changes. Research that combines socio-economic, demographic, and spatial factors in the context of care services has gained significant interest.

Given the demographic shift towards an aging population, exploring the application of GIS from a technical perspective is pivotal in addressing age-related challenges. GIS can play a crucial role in reducing inequities in access to aged care services. However, the literature on GIS applications within the field of aged care remains comparatively sparse. This scoping review aims to elucidate the specific aspects of aged care services, investigate the precise application of GIS in this domain, and discern the variations across different countries/regions and over time.

Methods

This scoping review was conducted through a structured five-step process, each step briefly outlined as follows:

Identification of review questions

Employing the methodological framework established by Arksey and O'Malley, this review delved into the application of GIS within the realm of aged care services. Arksey and O’Malley's seminal work in 2005 laid the groundwork for conducting scoping reviews, providing both rationale and methodological guidance [12]. Adhering to their framework, this scoping review investigated the integration of GIS in aged care services, an area that had seen limited scholarly exploration. By synthesizing three key elements—older adults, care services, and GIS—this paper sought to unpack the intricacies of GIS application in aged care. The review specifically addressed the following three pivotal questions:

  1. 1.

    What are the prevailing demands within aged care services?

  2. 2.

    How is GIS being applied in the sphere of aged care services?

  3. 3.

    Are there any spatial–temporal variations in the application of GIS within this field?

Literature retrieval

Literature retrieval for this scoping review was conducted across nine databases, encompassing five Chinese databases: CNKI, CSSCI, CSCD, VIP, and Wanfang; and four English databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Elsevier, and EBSCO. A comprehensive search strategy was implemented in these databases without imposing restrictions on publication date or geographic region of the literature. Rigorous documentation and categorization of the retrieved literature were undertaken, laying the groundwork for subsequent screening processes. The specific search strategies employed are outlined in Table 1. The search was completed up to May 2022, hence recent publications from June 2022 onwards were not included. To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of literature deduplication, we utilized the Covidence assessment system software (https://www.covidence.org/), which aided significantly in the preliminary screening of the literature.

Table 1 Searching strategies

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

In order to ensure that the selected literature aligned with our study objectives, an additional research team member was involved in examining the relevance and quality of the papers. Two team members collaboratively conducted the screening of necessary articles. This preliminary screening involved reviewing each article's title, abstract, and keywords to determine its potential inclusion in our study.

The criteria for inclusion in this review were as follows:

  1. 1.

    The primary focus on older adults aged 60 and above.

  2. 2.

    Utilization of GIS-related technology or methodologies.

  3. 3.

    Coverage of care or health services.

Conversely, the exclusion criteria were:

  1. 1.

    Articles that were reviews, conference proceedings, newspapers, books, dissertations, etc.

  2. 2.

    Studies where the target population was not primarily older adults, but included other demographic groups such as children and adults under 60 years old.

  3. 3.

    Articles that did not involve care or health services.

  4. 4.

    Lack of GIS technology or method application.

  5. 5.

    Articles that were not accessible or where the full text was unavailable.

  6. 6.

    Duplicate publications.

Consultation and determination

During the screening process of articles, instances arose where it was uncertain whether certain literature should be included. In such cases, consultation with another research team member was essential to make determinations based on the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. In scenarios where controversies persisted, a thorough review of the complete text was necessary to ascertain compliance with our inclusion requirements. Despite occasional minor contradictions, these articles were still considered eligible for inclusion in our research.

Evaluation

To comprehensively evaluate the selected articles, we assessed the overall quality based on five key aspects: research objectives, literature review, methodology, results, and significance. Each aspect of each article was graded according to the criteria outlined in Table 2, ensuring adherence to quality reporting standards [13]. For ease of scoring, we employed a four-level rating system: 0 for not meeting the standard, 1 for nearly meeting the standard, 2 for meeting the standard, and 3 for exceeding the standard. Out of the 65 articles evaluated, scores ranged from 7 to 14. Considering that a score of 2 per aspect indicates meeting the standard, and thus a cumulative score of 10 across all five aspects, articles scoring below 10 were excluded. Consequently, 4 articles scoring under 10 points were omitted, leaving 61 articles that met the criteria for this scoping review and were included in the analysis.

Table 2 Quality evaluation

Charting

Accurate and detailed data of the articles meeting the inclusion criteria were meticulously recorded in an Excel spreadsheet. This record included information such as title, author(s), publication year, research area, number of citations, target population, research methodology, and key findings.

Results

Following the aforementioned methodology, we initially screened a total of 5941 articles. Among these, 4183 were identified as duplicates and subsequently removed (as illustrated in Fig. 1). Collaboratively with another team member, we conducted an initial screening of the basic information of the remaining 1758 articles. This process resulted in the exclusion of 1608 articles that did not meet the established criteria. Subsequently, from the pool of 150 potential articles, an additional 89 articles were excluded. Ultimately, 61 articles satisfied all the inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis, as detailed in Table 3.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study selection

Table 3 Detailed information of included studies

Characteristics of included studies

The linguistic composition of the 61 articles included in our analysis was predominantly English, with 60 articles written in English and only one article in Chinese. Geographically, the distribution of research areas was varied: 24 articles originated from Asia, including China, Thailand, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea; 23 articles were from North America, specifically Canada and the United States; Europe contributed 8 articles, encompassing Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Britain, and Ireland; Oceania, represented solely by Australia, accounted for 5 articles; and South America had one article from Chile, as detailed in Table 4.

Table 4 61 Articles distributed by continent and country

Regarding the publication timeline, all articles were published in the twenty-first century, ranging from the earliest in 2003 to the most recent in 2022. Within the Asian context, 18 out of 24 articles focused on China, with 17 of these emanating from China’s first-tier cities or provincial capitals such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Nanjing. Taiwan was the subject of four articles, and the remaining article focused on a non-provincial capital city. These findings indicate that aged care service resources and the application of related technology tend to be concentrated in economically prosperous urban areas, resulting in a greater diversity of research outputs.

Utilizing the titles and abstracts of the 61 articles, word clouds and connection diagram were generated after excluding irrelevant words, such as prepositions and adverbs. These visualizations are depicted in Fig. 2, 3. As evident from Fig. 2, the term 'accessibility' emerges with the highest frequency, closely followed by 'elderly', 'service', and 'spatial'. Figure 3 illustrates robust connections between keywords like 'elderly', 'service', 'accessibility', and 'population'. This visualization underscores a prevalent research focus on accessibility and the strong association between older adults and the services they require. These figures not only reflect the thematic emphasis within the existing literature but also highlight the interconnected nature of these key concepts in aged care services research.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Word clouds of 61 articles

Fig. 3
figure 3

Connection diagram

Quality of articles included

Based on the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) data from 2021, the quality of the articles included in this review can be assessed. Out of the 61 articles, 28 were published in Q1 journals, representing approximately 46.0% of the total. Meanwhile, 29 articles were published in Q2-Q4 journals, accounting for about 44.3% of the selection. However, for 4 articles, the journal quality could not be determined due to either unavailability of information or inconsistencies in judging standards across different countries. Overall, the collected articles can be characterized as of moderately high quality.

Characteristics of target population

The target population in the 61 articles under review was primarily adults aged over 60, although the specific demographic varied across studies. 16 articles focused on older adults within a specific age range, whereas the remaining 45 did not differentiate among senior groups. Specific subpopulations were the focus of some studies: 3 articles investigated older adults with dementia [14, 16, 47]; 4 articles centered on vulnerable elderly individuals [28, 32, 38, 59]. The subjects of the remaining 9 studies included older adults with disabilities [48], those unable to drive [33], individuals with chronic diseases [43], high-risk seniors [45], elderly prone to falls [57], those affected by COVID-19 [66], low-income older adults [69], and those in need of public transportation services [68].

Care services and demands of older adults

Aging is often associated with a decline in physical function, which in turn leads to changes in needs and demands. Among the 61 articles reviewed, the needs of older adults were categorized into medical care, basic living, transportation, and spiritual needs. A total of 37 articles focused on medical care [3, 15, 16, 20, 21, 23, 24, 28, 29, 31, 32, 36, 37, 39,40,41, 43, 45,46,47,48,49,50, 50, 51, 53, 54, 56, 57, 60, 63,64,65,66,67,68, 72], 14 articles addressed basic living needs [14, 18, 26, 27, 30, 35, 38, 44, 52, 55, 58, 61, 62, 69], 8 articles discussed transportation needs [19, 22, 25, 34, 42, 70, 71, 73], and 2 articles explored spiritual needs [17, 33].

These needs encompass various care services for older adults. Medical care needs primarily included oral health care [3, 20, 31, 41, 53], family physician and nurse practitioner services [21], medical and health facilities and services [24, 36, 37, 49, 50, 54, 63, 64, 66,67,68, 72], disaster relief [29, 32, 46], palliative care [40], primary health care [51, 65], and fall prevention [57, 60]. Basic living needs covered areas such as aged care facilities or services [18, 30, 52, 58, 61], daily care services [26], housing [44], etc. Transportation needs involved daily activities [19, 34] and walking [22, 42]. Spiritual needs comprised recreational facilities [17] and religious beliefs [33].

Application of GIS

In the reviewed articles, the application of GIS was demonstrated through various methodologies. Among the 61 articles, the 2SFCA (two-step floating catchment area) method was employed in 11 articles [30, 37, 44, 50,51,52, 63, 64, 66,67,68]. Ten articles utilized ArcGIS software [29, 36, 39, 40, 43, 44, 61, 62, 65, 68], and another ten articles applied the database functions of GIS [3, 17, 38, 48, 51, 53, 55, 58, 63, 67]. Six articles combined GIS with case study approaches [15, 50, 51, 54, 63, 64], while another six focused on spatial analysis [28, 43, 53, 55, 56, 62]. The ABM (Agent-Based Modeling) method was used in three articles [20, 23, 26]. Notably, 27 articles employed GIS to study accessibility issues [17,18,19,20,21, 23, 25, 29,30,31, 33, 36, 37, 39,40,41,42, 44, 46, 48, 50,51,52, 63, 67,68,69].

Spatial–temporal differences in application

From a historical perspective, the earliest studies included in this review were published in the United States and Canada in 2003, while the most recent publication originated from China in 2022. The temporal distribution of the articles shows a marked increase in recent years: a total of 20 articles were published from 2003 to 2017, and a significant uptick occurred from 2018 onwards, with 41 articles being published in the span from 2018 to 2022.

Geographically, the majority of research output originated from Asia and North America, accounting for a combined total of 47 articles, which is approximately 77% of the total. Within Asia, China was the most prolific, contributing 18 articles. Most of these Chinese studies were focused on the distribution or accessibility of medical service resources and community aged care services, displaying a relative consistency in research topics. In contrast, the 23 North American articles, with 18 of them from the United States, showcased a diversity of research topics, often centering on case studies in various regions.

Discussion

The analysis of the 61 articles in this review underscores that GIS applications exhibit varying characteristics and play diverse potential roles in aged care services, catering to different populations and service needs. Over nearly two decades, from 2003 to 2022, the utilization of GIS in aged care services has evolved considerably, particularly in the last five years, where development has been notably rapid. However, there still exist limitations in research methodologies and the specificity of target populations. This scoping review, conducted after a thorough screening and retrieval process, represents the first of its kind to focus on GIS applications in the field of aged care services.

The included articles showcased a variety of methods for applying GIS. Common approaches encompassed GIS-based modeling, creating illustrations with GIS, positioning and site selection, and utilizing a GIS database. Firstly, several articles integrated GIS with models, predominantly employing ABM and 2SFCA methods, accounting for 14 articles in total. ABM facilitated nuanced simulation and prediction, allowing for the construction of 'hypothetical' scenarios from multiple perspectives. This approach proved versatile in addressing diverse problems, meeting the needs of various groups, and aiding decision-making processes. The 2SFCA method was primarily used to assess accessibility and relative ease of access to different aged care service resources. Secondly, generating images using GIS technologies, particularly through software like ArcGIS, was a widely used function. For instance, researchers utilized this capability to map feasible routes for older adults to access services, enhancing the efficiency of public resource utilization and catering to the needs of vulnerable elderly populations [33]. This application aids in comprehending the distribution of facilities, mitigating resource distribution inequality, and visualizing care services. Furthermore, GIS was employed for location-specific purposes, such as identifying new sites for specialized medical shelters [32]. Finally, some studies leveraged the information storage and management capabilities of GIS to gather data on public infrastructure locations and images, or to select sites for public facilities.

To accurately address research objectives, researchers often opted for multiple methods rather than relying on a singular approach. This multipronged strategy enabled a more nuanced analysis suitable for the complexities of each study. For instance, one study utilized GIS software to create a geographic database and developed a GIS-based procedure to evaluate accessibility levels of urban services for the elderly. It selected the local primary health service in Naples as a case study and employed the 2SFCA method for evaluation, revealing significantly low levels of community accessibility [51]. Such complex problems often require a multifaceted methodological approach to yield scientifically sound and reasonable results. Overall, GIS applications were diverse, with their specific uses varying both spatially and temporally, thereby enhancing their utility in research.

From 2003 to 2022, methods in aged care service research evolved from singular to more complex approaches. Initially, researchers focused on building theoretical frameworks, gradually incorporating various models and application software to translate theory into practical, applicable activities. The evolution in the aged population research mirrored this diversification. The target demographic shifted from a general, homogeneous elderly population to more specific, heterogeneous groups, including frail, chronically ill, and low-income older adults.

For instance, a Canadian study in 2003 utilized GIS to analyze fall patterns among older adults based on emergency department reports in specific regions, employing the empirical Bayesian method for prediction in Edmonton [57]. This approach, though relatively straightforward, combined qualitative GIS methods with statistical analysis to draw universally applicable conclusions, setting a precedent for subsequent research. However, it lacked consideration of personal, environmental, and social factors. In contrast, a 2011 study from the United States advanced this research by using GIS to assist health planners in developing site selection strategies for fall prevention among older adults, employing ArcGIS’s Network Analyst Extension [60]. This study improved upon earlier research by considering geographical distribution, mobility, and actual travel time to destinations for older adults, thus encompassing more comprehensive factors. However, it did not account for the technical capacity of public health planners or changes in population density.

The distribution of research publications reveals that developed countries accounted for 40 papers, surpassing the number from developing countries, with a more diverse range of application methods. Developing countries contributed 21 papers, 18 of which originated from China, with only 3 from other countries. This disparity underscores the influence of economic development on scientific research capabilities and the extent of attention researchers devote to social issues. Nations with a higher volume of publications tended to explore more varied topics and focus on different demographic groups. For instance, the significance of oral care is well-recognized, and the dental industry in developed countries is well-established. All five articles on oral health care were from developed countries. Additionally, transportation accessibility is a crucial aspect of health resource accessibility, impacting the efficiency, effectiveness, and level of care resource access for older adults. Of the 27 articles focusing on accessibility, those from countries other than China were predominantly from developed nations like the United States, Japan, and Australia. It is also important to acknowledge that the needs for care services among older adults vary across different cultural backgrounds, and public facilities, the social environment, and local policies exert varying degrees of influence on aged care [74]. Future research should consider socio-economic factors more thoroughly.

GIS, with its use of image data and calculation results, offers an intuitive understanding of the relationships between people and land, and between different land areas. Spatial analysis in GIS underscores the value of potential service spatiotemporal acquisition patterns. Data plays a vital role in GIS applications, especially when employing certain models and methods, where it relies heavily on data support. In studying the impact of public care services on older adults, the use of public data is essential. However, the transparency of public data is limited, and not all necessary data are readily accessible. Therefore, relevant public sectors and institutions could enhance data openness, establish public databases, and ease the challenges of data acquisition, enabling more effective research. Future developments might see GIS applications tailored for different institutions or departments, with research and development personnel creating features specific to various institutional types. For users, the operating interface and functions should be as user-friendly as possible.

Beyond data release, ethical considerations regarding data are also paramount. Although GIS databases typically do not involve highly specific personal data like home addresses or phone numbers, it is crucial for relevant sectors and institutions to prioritize the privacy and data security of older adults, implementing multi-level data management. If feasible, the formulation of laws and regulations in this regard might be beneficial.

Additionally, it is observed that resources are often concentrated in densely populated urban areas. Within the 61 articles analyzed, 18 were focused on China, with 17 of these studies based in either first-tier or provincial capital cities. This trend indicates a tendency for researchers to focus on regions with more abundant resources. Large cities, with their dense populations and attractiveness to younger demographics, exhibit a certain balance in their population structure. In contrast, smaller cities often grapple with the migration of younger individuals to larger urban areas, exacerbating the aging issue and receiving less research attention. Consequently, there is a need for future research to focus on these less prominent cities and the aged care services they require.

An examination of the Web of Science database for reviews linking GIS and care services yielded 14 results, but none specifically targeted the elderly. This gap highlights the significant research value and importance of our work. Nonetheless, our review has its limitations. Firstly, due to the constraints in available literature, it includes only those articles retrieved before May 2022. Secondly, while this paper provides an overview of the specific GIS analysis methods used in the included literature, especially the more pertinent models, a more detailed discussion of these methods is warranted in future research. Given the universality of aging, this review holds both theoretical and practical significance.

As the demographic shift towards an aging population accelerates, urban planning must adapt accordingly, particularly in developing countries where rapid urbanization is significantly altering people's lives. Enhancing the city’s environment to be more elderly-friendly requires bolstering supportive measures, both physical and non-physical, to promote the sustainability of health care and social services. Given that GIS applications frequently involve data on population, economy, or facilities, governments could benefit from dynamically and timely updating relevant databases to aid in decision-making. The precision of data directly correlates with the realism of the results obtained.

Different countries should formulate and enact laws and policies that reflect their unique characteristics. In these policies, especially those concerning the allocation of aged care services or the planning of future resources, GIS can be a valuable tool for implementation. Considerations of efficiency and fairness are crucial in these allocations. For instance, in China, it is important that central and local policies align, are feasible, and effectively implemented. Moreover, problem analysis between different provinces and cities should be grounded in their specific realities and circumstances.

Future research should delve deeper into the care service needs of distinct subgroups within the elderly population. The characteristics of these groups can vary significantly, necessitating focused attention on vulnerable segments, such as individuals suffering from Alzheimer's disease, whose needs and challenges differ markedly from those without the condition [14].

The selected articles indicate nascent studies on the application of GIS to address the needs of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future investigations into COVID-19-related issues should pay closer attention to the unique care service requirements of older adults, encompassing both material and spiritual needs. GIS methods and technologies enable spatial and temporal interaction, which is particularly relevant as the needs of older individuals evolve throughout the course of the pandemic. Understanding the changing needs of different age groups at various stages will be a critical area of focus. To address the issues of inequitable distribution and inadequate accessibility of care services, it is advisable to integrate GIS with simulation methods such as ABM. This approach could enhance the delivery and effectiveness of care services to older adults and other vulnerable populations, ensuring their needs are met more comprehensively and effectively.

Conclusion

As the inaugural scoping review focusing on the application of GIS in aged care services, this study has illuminated the considerable development and maturation of GIS technology and its applications over the past two decades. GIS offers valuable insights by leveraging geographic information systems and spatial analysis, thereby underscoring the importance of potential spatio-temporal acquisition patterns in aged care services. This, in turn, enhances efficiency and fairness in service distribution. The application of GIS in this field exhibits distinct spatial and temporal variations. Developed countries have been early adopters of GIS, enabling them to address the needs of specific subpopulations of older adults more effectively. In contrast, research in developing countries has been relatively limited, with a notable lack of diversity in research methodologies.

The diverse needs of older adults have consistently been a focal point of research, leading to continuous enhancement in the understanding and provision of care services. Researchers from various countries and regions are increasingly focusing on localized research, enriching and completing the application of GIS in this field. Theoretically, there is a need for innovative methods and techniques, with research approaches being adaptively tailored to the specific issues under study. Practically, the varying needs of different age groups within the elderly population must be considered, and relevant public sectors and institutions should take responsibility for ensuring the efficiency and fairness of care service allocation. Moreover, data is a crucial component of GIS, and effective analysis relies on the availability of accurate and moderately open data sources. Moving forward, attention must be paid to the accessibility and precision of data to further the efficacy and impact of GIS applications in aged care services.

Availability of data and materials

The present study is exclusively based on data extracted from previously published research. As such, this scoping review does not involve any original primary data collection. All data utilized and analyzed in this study are derived from the original papers referenced herein. Consequently, there are no separate datasets to share beyond what is already available within the articles cited in this study. Readers can find the data supporting the findings of our research comprehensively detailed within the body of this article.

References

  1. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/wpp2022_summary_of_results.pdf

  2. Lee YH, Chang YC, Wang YT, Shelley M. Have the chinese older adults received adequate healthcare services since the 2009 health reform? Examining the socioeconomic disparity in receiving adequate healthcare. Healthcare. 2020;8(3):208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamil W, Kruger E, McGeachie J, Jean G, Tennant M. Distribution of Australian dental practices in relation to the ageing population. Gerodontology. 2022;39(3):302–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jozi SA, Zaredar N, Rezaeian S. Evaluation of ecological capability using spatial multi criteria evaluation Method(SMCE) (Case study: implementation of indoor recreation in Varjin Protected Area-Iran) [J]. Fems Microbiology Ecology. 2010;63(2):273–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lu C, Zhang Z, Lan X. Impact of China’s referral reform on the equity and spatial accessibility of healthcare resources A case study of Beijing [J]. Soc Sci Med. 2019;235:112386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Talen E, Anselin L. Assessing spatial equity an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environ Plan A. 1998;30:595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McLafferty SL. GIS and health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:25–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shatnawi N, Al-Omari A, Al-Mashaqbeh A. Comparative study of using E2SFCA and 3SFCA methods for selected healthcare resources in Jordan during COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Healthc Manag. 2022;15(4):347–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma L, Luo N, Wan T, et al. An improved healthcare accessibility measure considering the temporal dimension and population demand of different ages [J]. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2018;15(11):2421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Delamater PL. Spatial accessibility in suboptimally configured health care systems A modified two-step floating catchment area (M2SFCA) metric [J]. Health Place. 2013;24C:30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang FH. From 2SFCA to i2SFCA: integration, derivation and validation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2021;35(3):628–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Westphaln KK, Regoeczi W, Masotya M, et al. From Arksey and O’Malley and Beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology [J]. MethodsX. 2021;8(1):101375.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mullet DR. Catalysts of Women’s Talent Development in STEM: A Systematic Review (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Denton: University of North Texas; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sturge J, Klaassens M, Lager D, Weitkamp G, Vegter D, Meijering L. Using the concept of activity space to understand the social health of older adults living with memory problems and dementia at home. Soc Sci Med. 2021;288:113208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruza J, Kim JI, Leung I, Kam C, Ng SYM. Sustainable, age-friendly cities An evaluation framework and case study application on Palo Alto. Calif Sustainable Cities Soc. 2015;14:390–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scerpella DL, Adam A, Marx K, Gitlin LN. Implications of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for targeted recruitment of older adults with dementia and their caregivers in the community: A retrospective analysis. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019;14:100338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng L, Caset F, De Vos J, Derudder B, Witlox F. Investigating walking accessibility to recreational amenities for elderly people in Nanjing, China. Transp Res Part D-Transp Environ. 2019;76:85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Amini-Behbahani P, Meng L, Gu N. Walking distances from services and destinations for residential aged-care centres in Australian cities. J Transp Geogr. 2020;85:102707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Horner MW, Duncan MD, Wood BS, Valdez-Torres Y, Stansbury C. Do aging populations have differential accessibility to activities? analyzing the spatial structure of social, professional, and business opportunities. Travel Behav Soc. 2015;2(3):182–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jin Z, Northridge ME, Metcalf SS. Modeling the influence of social ties and transportation choice on access to oral healthcare for older adults. Appl Geogr. 2018;96:66–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shah TI, Milosavljevic S, Bath B. Determining geographic accessibility of family physician and nurse practitioner services in relation to the distribution of seniors within two Canadian Prairie Provinces. Soc Sci Med. 2017;194:96–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Z, Lee C. Site and neighborhood environments for walking among older adults. Health Place. 2010;16(6):1268–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang QY, Northridge ME, Jin Z, Metcalf SS. Modeling accessibility of screening and treatment facilities for older adults using transportation networks. Appl Geogr. 2018;93:64–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gu TT, Li LZ, Li DZ. A two-stage spatial allocation model for elderly healthcare facilities in large-scale affordable housing communities: a case study in Nanjing City. Int J Equity in Health. 2018;17:183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu HH, Pan L, Li YJ, Jin HM, Wang Q, Liu X, et al. Spatial accessibility assessment of prehospital EMS with a focus on the elderly population: a case study in Ningbo, China. Int J Environ Research and Public Health. 2021;18(19):9964.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ma Y, Shen ZJ, Nguyen DT. Agent-Based Simulation to Inform Planning Strategies for Welfare Facilities for the Elderly: Day Care Center Development in a Japanese City. J Artif Soc Soc Simul. 2016;19(4):5. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3090.

  27. Dermatis Z, Lazakidou A, Anastasiou A, Liargovas P. Analyzing Socio-Economic and Geographical Factors that Affect the Health of the Elderly. J Knowl Econ. 2021;12(4):1925–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hames E, Stoler J, Emrich CT, Tewary S, Pandya N. A GIS approach to identifying socially and medically vulnerable older adult populations in South Florida. Gerontologist. 2017;57(6):1133–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Marcelin JM, Homer MW, Ozguven E, Kocatepe A. How does accessibility to post-disaster relief compare between the aging and the general population? A spatial network optimization analysis of hurricane relief facility locations. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction. 2016;15:61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng Y, Wang JE, Rosenberg MW. Spatial access to residential care resources in Beijing China. Int J Health Geogr. 2012;11:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Patel R, Tennant M, Kruger E. Understanding the role of the public transport network in the greater Sydney area in providing access to dental care. Aust Health Rev. 2019;43(6):628–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Horner MW, Ozguven EE, Marcelin JM, Kocatepe A. Special needs hurricane shelters and the ageing population: development of a methodology and a case study application. Disasters. 2018;42(1):169–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lewinson T, Maley O, Esnard AM. Accessing Faith-Based Organizations Using Public Transportation: A Qualitative and GIS Study. J Appl Gerontol. 2019;38(3):323–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Park JH, Park JH, Song SH, Lai TF, Liao Y. Which neighborhood destinations matter in the asian context? the role of destinations in older adults’ physical activity and sedentary behaviors. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8432934.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Walker BB, Canham SL, Wister A, Fang ML. A GIS Analysis of East Asian Care Gaps in Residential and Assisted Living Facilities in Vancouver, Canada. J Hous Elder. 2019;33(2):103–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruan K, Zhang Q. Accessibility evaluation of high order urban hospitals for the elderly: a case study of first-level Hospitals in Xi’an, China. Symmetry-Basel. 2018;10(10):489.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ikram SZ, Hu YJ, Wang FH. Disparities in Spatial Accessibility of Pharmacies in Baton Rouge. Louisiana Geograp Rev. 2015;105(4):492–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mena C, Ormazabal Y, Fuentes E, Palomo I. Impacts of Physical Environment Perception on the Frailty Condition in Older People. Geospat Health. 2020;15(1):140–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu HC, Tseng MH. Evaluating disparities in elderly community care resources: using a geographic accessibility and inequality index. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(7):1353.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Schuurman N, Amram O, Crooks VA, Johnston R, Williams A. A comparative analysis of potential spatio-temporal access to palliative care services in two Canadian provinces. Bmc Health Serv Res. 2015;15:270.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hanibuchi T, Aida J, Nakade M, Hirai H, Kondo K. Geographical accessibility to dental care in the Japanese elderly. Community Dent Health. 2011;28(2):128–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gaglione F, Cottrill C, Gargiulo C. Urban services, pedestrian networks and behaviors to measure elderly accessibility. Transportaion Res Part D-Transport Environ. 2021;90:102687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rittirong J. Health centre visits among the elderly with chronic ailments: Evidence from the Kanchanaburi Demographic Surveillance System, 2004. Thailand Asian Popul Stud. 2016;12(2):187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Peng TC. The capitalization of spatial healthcare accessibility into house prices in Taiwan: an application of spatial quantile regression. Int J Housing Markets Anal. 2021;14(5):860–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Smith ML, Towne SD, Herrera-Venson A, Cameron K, Horel SA, Ory MG, et al. Delivery of fall prevention interventions for at-risk older adults in rural areas: findings from a national dissemination. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2018;15(12):2798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Prasad S. Measuring and comparing hospital accessibility for palm beach county’s elderly and nonelderly populations during a hurricane. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018;12(3):296–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lin CC, Chiu MJ, Hsiao CC, Lee RG, Tsai YS. Wireless health care service system for elderly with dementia. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006;10(4):696–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Naruse T, Matsumoto H, Fujisaki-Sakai M, Nagata S. Measurement of special access to home visit nursing services among Japanese disabled elderly people: using GIS and claim data. Bmc Health Serv Res. 2017;17:377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. O’Mahony E, She EN, Bailey J, Mannan H, McAuliffe E, Ryan J, et al. Using geographic information systems to map older people’s emergency department attendance for future health planning. Emerg Med J. 2019;36(12):748–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Deborah OML, Chiu MYL, Cao K. Geographical accessibility of community health assist scheme general practitioners for the elderly population in singapore: a case study on the elderly living in housing development board flats. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2018;15(9):1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Carpentieri G, Guida C, Masoumi HE. Multimodal accessibility to primary health services for the elderly: a case study of Naples, Italy. Sustainability. 2020;12(3):781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Liu SW, Wang YP, Zhou D, Kang YT. Two-step floating catchment area model-based evaluation of community care facilities’ spatial accessibility in Xi’an, China. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2020;17(14):5086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Borrell LN, Northridge ME, Miller DB, Golembeski CA, Spielman SE, Sclar ED, et al. Oral health and health care for older adults: a spatial approach for addressing disparities and planning services. Spec Care Dentist. 2006;26(6):252–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kim JI, Senaratna DM, Ruza J, Kam C, Ng S. Feasibility Study on an Evidence-Based Decision-Support System for Hospital Site Selection for an Aging Population. Sustainability. 2015;7(3):2730–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hirshorn BA, Stewart JE. Geographic information systems in community-based gerontological research and practice. J Appl Gerontol. 2003;22(1):134–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Matei E, Saghin D, Dumitrache L, Nae M. Multidimensional approach on sustainability of ageing in Romanian residential care centres for elders. Sustainability. 2018;10(9):3336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yiannakoulias N, Rowe BH, Svenson LW, Schopflocher DP, Kelly K, Voaklander DC. Zones of prevention: the geography of fall injuries in the elderly. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(11):2065–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yongjiu X, Shiyu D, Yue W. The rationality of spatial allocation of pension service facilities in Hefei city based on life cycle theory. Trop Geogr. 2021;04:769–77. https://doi.org/10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Taylor D, Barrie H, Lange J, Thompson MQ, Theou O, Visvanathan R. Geospatial modelling of the prevalence and changing distribution of frailty in Australia-2011 to 2027. Exp Gerontol. 2019;123:57–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Carlson T, York S, Primomo J. The utilization of geographic information systems to create a site selection strategy to disseminate an older adult fall prevention program. Soc Sci J. 2011;48(1):159–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Cheng M, Cui X. Spatial optimization of residential care facility configuration based on the integration of modified immune algorithm and gis: a case study of Jing’an District in Shanghai, China. Int J Environmental Res Pub Health. 2020;17(21):8090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Choi K, Lee Y, Basrak Z. Identifying Communities of Concern for Older Adults Using Spatial Analysis: Focusing on Accessibility to Health, Social, and Daily Services. J Appl Gerontol. 2021;40(11):1527–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Cheng L, Yang M, De Vos J, Witlox F. Examining geographical accessibility to multi-tier hospital care services for the elderly: A focus on spatial equity. J Transport Health. 2020;19:100926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Chen GP, Wang CC, Jin PB, Xia BY, Xiao L, Chen SY, et al. Evaluation of healthcare inequity for older adults: A spatio-temporal perspective. J Transport Health. 2020;19:100911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Evans R, Larkins S, Cheffins T, Fleming R, Johnston K, Tennant M. Mapping access to health services as a strategy for planning: access to primary care for older people in regional Queensland. Aust J Prim Health. 2017;23(2):114–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Guida C, Carpentieri G. Quality of life in the urban environment and primary health services for the elderly during the Covid-19 pandemic: An application to the city of Milan (Italy). Cities. 2021;110:103038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Luo J, Chen GP, Li C, Xia BY, Sun X, Chen SY. Use of an E2SFCA method to measure and analyse spatial accessibility to medical services for elderly people in Wuhan, China. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2018;15(7):1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Chen WD, Cheng L, Chen XW, Chen JX, Cao MQ. Measuring accessibility to health care services for older bus passengers: A finer spatial resolution. J Transport Geogr. 2021;93:103068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Park S, Cho J, Chen YC. Subsidized housing and geographic accessibility to neighborhood resources for low-income older people: From later year social exclusion perspective. Geoforum. 2019;106:297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Ma Y, Zou G, Shin JH, et al. Locating Community-Based Comprehensive Service Facilities for Older Adults Using the GIS-NEMA Method in Harbin, China[J]. J Urban Plann Dev. 2021;2:147.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Gaglione F, Gargiulo C, Zucaro F. Elders’ quality of life a method to optimize pedestrian accessibility to urban services. TeMA - J Land Use Mobility Environ. 2019;3:295–312.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Gao YY, Li Z. Optimization and adjustment of multilevel medical facilities for the elderly from the perspective of accessibility. J Urban Plann Dev. 2022;148(2):05022011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Cho H, Choi J, No W, et al. Accessibility of welfare facilities for elderly people in Daejeon, South Korea considering public transportation accessibility[J]. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021;12:100514.

  74. Yu A. Open space and sense of community of older adults a study in a residential area in Hong Kong. Int J Archit Res Archnet-IJAR. 2021;15(3):539–54.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was funded by the Project of Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (grant number: 2022JJ30055); Project of Changsha Municipal Science and Technology Plan (grant number: kh2302039); Project of Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate (grant number: QL20220020); Postgraduate Innovative Project of Central South University (grant number: 2022XQLH095).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design of this review. XW led the data collection, developed the search strategy, carried out screening, quality assessment, and data extraction, did the statistical analysis, interpreted the data, and wrote the first draft. ZL conceived the concept, acquired the fundings and revised the review. All authors carefully reviewed this and subsequent drafts. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission. All authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhihan Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Liu, Z. Navigating Aged Care Services with GIS: Trends, Developments, and Future Directions. BMC Geriatr 24, 243 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04799-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04799-4

Keywords