Skip to main content
Download PDF

The relationship between dysphagia and frailty among Chinese hospitalized older patients: a serial mediation model through self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status

BMC Geriatrics volume 24, Article number: 110 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Frailty contributes to adverse outcomes in older adults and places a heavy burden on healthcare resources. Dysphagia is associated with frailty, but the mechanisms by which dysphagia affects frailty in older adults are unclear. This study aimed to investigate a serial mediating effect of self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status in the relationship between dysphagia and frailty among hospitalized older patients in China.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 1200 patients aged ≥ 65 years in the Department of Geriatrics, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital. A structured face-to-face interview was used to survey the following questionnaires: General Information Questionnaire, Tilburg Frailty Indicators (TFI), Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10), 30mL Water Swallow Test (WST), Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI), and Short-Form Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF). A total of 980 participants with complete data were included in the analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 and Amos 28.0 software. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used for correlation analysis of study variables. The results of the multivariate linear regression analysis for frailty were used as covariates in the mediation analysis, and the structural equation model (SEM) was used to analyze the mediating effects among the study variables.

Results

Dysphagia, self-perceived oral health, self-reported nutritional status, and frailty were significantly correlated (P<0.001). Dysphagia was found to directly affect frailty (β = 0.161, 95%CI = 0.089 to 0.235) and through three significant mediation pathways: (1) the path through self-perceived oral health (β = 0.169, 95%CI = 0.120 to 0.221), accounting for 36.98% of the total effect; (2) the path through self-reported nutritional status (β = 0.050, 95%CI = 0.023 to 0.082), accounting for 10.94% of the total effect; (3) the path through self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status (β = 0.077, 95%CI = 0.058 to 0.102), accounting for 16.85% of the total effect. The total mediation effect was 64.77%.

Conclusions

This study indicated that dysphagia was significantly associated with frailty. Self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status were serial mediators of this relationship. Improving the oral health and nutritional status of hospitalized older patients may prevent or delay the frailty caused by dysphagia.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The global aging situation is becoming increasingly critical [1]. Frailty is the greatest challenge facing older adults, a state of age-related decline in physiological reserve, reduced ability to maintain physiological balance, and increased vulnerability to adverse health events [2, 3]. A meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of frailty was 29.8% in hospitals, and was lowest in the community (13.3%) [4]. The prevalence of frailty in hospitalized older adults was higher than that in community-dwelling older adults [4,5,6]. Since the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has put a lot of pressure on people’s health, and although the COVID-19 pandemic has been regularly for prevention and control, it still increases the risk of frailty in older adults [7]. Frailty affects the health of older adults, increases healthcare utilization, and also increases the risk of serious COVID-19 [3, 4, 8, 9]. However, frailty in older adults is potentially reversible [10, 11]. A growing number of studies have focused on risk factors of frailty in older adults. Notably, dysphagia can be consider a risk factor for frailty [12, 13]. Although dysphagia has been shown to be associated with frailty in older adults, its effect on frailty remains unclear.

In addition to direct effect of dysphagia on frailty, research into the pathways involved in this relationship is also very meaningful. During the aging process, both the physiological functions of older adults deteriorate, leading to a range of oral problems. Oral health negatively correlated with frailty in hospitalized older patients [14]. Fewer teeth and poorer oral function were associated with frailty [15]. Meanwhile, previous studies have found a significant correlation between dysphagia and oral health [16]. Considering the association of oral health with dysphagia and frailty, dysphagia may cause poor oral health, which may lead to frailty. Thus it is possible that dysphagia contributes to frailty through poor oral health.

Nutritional status is considered a key contributor to the pathophysiology of frailty [17]. A Chinese study found that hospitalized older patients with good nutrition were less likely to develop frailty [18]. Furthermore, many studies reported that nutritional status was negatively associated with dysphagia [13, 19, 20]. Given the link between nutritional status, dysphagia and frailty, we assume that nutritional status may mediate the relationship between dysphagia and frailty. Meanwhile, preliminary evidence suggested that the relationship between oral health and frailty could be achieved through a nutritional pathway [21]. Therefore, we hypothesized that oral health may be a prerequisite for nutritional status. From the above analysis, oral health and nutritional status may serially mediate the association between dysphagia and frailty, i.e. the mediators oral health and nutritional status exhibit sequential characteristics, forming a mediation chain through which dysphagia has an indirect effect on frailty [22].

Frailty and dysphagia are common problems in older adults and need to be concerned. However, there are few studies on the relationship between dysphagia and frailty, and further in-depth studies on the correlation between the two are needed. The purpose of the present study was to explore the serial mediating effect of self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status in the relationship between dysphagia and frailty. We proposed the following four hypotheses and the hypothesized model (shown in Fig. 1) as follows:

  1. •

    Hypothesis 1 (H1). Dysphagia is significantly associated with frailty in Chinese hospitalized older patients;

  2. •

    Hypothesis 2 (H2). Self-perceived oral health mediates the association between dysphagia and frailty;

  3. •

    Hypothesis 3 (H3). Self-reported nutritional status mediates the association between dysphagia and frailty;

  4. •

    Hypothesis 4 (H4). Self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status play a serial-mediation role in the relationship between dysphagia and frailty.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Hypothesized model for this study

Full size image

Methods

Study design and participants

A cross-sectional study with structured face-to-face interview was conducted in the Department of Geriatrics, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital from May 2022 to December 2022, using convenience sampling. Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, located in the urban area of Xi’an City, Shaanxi Province, Northwest China, is a large-scale comprehensive public hospital directly under the provincial government, integrating medical care, emergency care, and rehabilitation.

Inclusion criteria were: (1) age ≥ 65 years; (2) stable condition: in the judgment of the patient’s attending physician, the patient is not currently in an acute or critical condition or in need of resuscitation; (3) able to take food orally; (4) clear consciousness, verbal communication ability, cognitive judgment ability: the patient is clearly conscious, has no history of physician-diagnosed dementia, psychiatric or serious somatic diseases, and has no communication deficits, as determined by review of the patient’s medical record. Individuals were excluded if they had severe difficulty opening their mouths, oral surgery, or trauma.

The sample size was calculated using the Westland-Structural Equation Model (SEM) Sample Size Calculator [23]. Based on expert recommendations, we set the minimum effect to detect at 0–0.12, significance at 0.05, and power at 0.8. According to our hypothesized model (assuming all 10 general information as covariates), the number of latent variables and indicators variables in our study was 2 and 18, respectively. Therefore, the minimum required sample size for this study was 591. Taking into account the loss and refusal of interviews, a total of 1200 questionnaires were finally distributed.

Measures

General information questionnaire

To obtain reliable results, general information related to frailty needs to be controlled, and after reviewing the literature [3, 24], the following general information questionnaire was developed: gender, age, marital status, educational level, physical exercise (judged to be ≥ 3 times per week for ≥ 30 min each time, including jogging, eight-dan brocade, tai chi, balance training, etc.), sleep disorders (include inability to fall asleep within 30 min, waking up easily at night, dreaminess, snoring, and waking up early), constipation (defined as bowel movements ≤ 3 times per week in the past 6 months), comorbidity (referred to having ≥ 2 kinds of chronic diseases, including hypertension, heart disease, stroke, diabetes, tumors, etc.), polypharmacy (defined as taking ≥ 5 types of medications per day, including prescription, over-the-counter, and Chinese herbal medications), and denture use.

Frailty

Frailty was assessed with the Tilburg Frailty Indicators (TFI) [25]. It is a self-report scale consisting of three dimensions of physical frailty (8 items), social frailty (3 items), and psychological frailty (4 items), for a total of 15 items. The scale adopts a dichotomous scoring method, with the total score ranging from 0 to 15. And a score of ≥ 5 indicates frailty in older adults. The Chinese version of TFI had good reliability and validity, and can be used as a frailty assessment tool in elderly inpatients [26]. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.748.

Dysphagia

Dysphagia was examined by the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) [27] and the 30mL Water Swallow Test (WST) [28]. In the present study, dysphagia was considered to be present if the results of both tools indicated dysphagia.

The EAT-10 is a 10-item self-report scale. In 2013, the Chinese expert consensus on rehabilitation assessment and treatment of dysphagia translated it and recommended its use [29]. The EAT-10 consists of 10 questions pointed from 0 to 4, with a total score of 0–40. For each question, 0 indicates “no problem”, while 4 indicates “severe problem”, with higher score suggesting more severe swallowing problem. A cut-off value of 3 was recommended as the best cut-off value for the EAT-10 [30]. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.907 in this sample.

The WST requires patients to drink 30mL of water at a normal rate in an upright position and observes the time required and whether choking occurs. Based on the observation results, patients are classified as Grade I–IV. Normal: Grade I (< 5 s); suspicious: Grade I (≥ 5 s) or Grade II; abnormal: Grade III–V. Suspicious and abnormal were treated as dysphagia in our study.

Oral health

The Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) was employed to evaluate self-perceived oral health. It includes three dimensions of physiological function (4 items), pain and discomfort (3 items), and psychosocial function (5 items), for a total of 12 items. The Likert 5-point scoring method is used. With a total score of 12–60, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is divided into three levels: high (57–60), medium (51–56), and low (≤ 50) [31, 32]. The higher the score of GOHAI, the better the OHRQoL. Chinese scholars found that the Chinese version of GOHAI had good reliability and validity [32]. The Cronbach’s alpha for this sample was 0.863.

Nutritional status

The Short-Form Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF) was used to assess self-reported nutritional status [33]. The MNA-SF is composed of 6 items: (1) Ask the patient about his/her weight loss in the past 3 months. (2) Body mass index (BMI) = weight/height2 (kg/m2), height and weight are measured on a scale in the department, with shoes off and only a gown on. If the patient is unable to get out of bed, the calf circumference is measured. (3) Ask the patient if he/she has suffered any trauma or acute illness in the past 3 months. (4) Mobility: ask the patient if he/she is bedridden or wheelchair-bound for a long period of time, and if he/she goes out to do activities. (5) Spiritual and psychological: combine the answers from the patient, his/her family and his/her doctor to make a comprehensive judgment.6) Whether he/she has eaten less food due to loss of appetite, dyspepsia, difficulty in chewing or swallowing in the past 3 months: severe reduction in eating is defined as more than 75% reduction in eating, moderate reduction is defined as 10–75%, and no change is defined as a change in eating within ± 10%. The total score ranges from 0 to 14. The assessment results are classified as normal nutritional status (12–14), risk of malnutrition (8–11), and malnutrition (0–7). The higher the score, the better the nutritional status. Chinese scholars found that the sensitivity and specificity of MNA-SF were high, and it can be used for early assessment and screening of nutritional status in Chinese older adults [34]. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.686.

Data collection

The researcher conducted a pilot study on 35 older patients at the Department of Geriatrics, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital in May 2022. The results of the pilot study showed that: the reliability of the TFI, EAT-10, GOHAI, and MNA-SF was good; the patients’ cooperation was high; and the questionnaires were operable and took an average of 15 min to complete, which was within the patients’ acceptable range. Based on the results of the pilot study and patients’ feedback, the researcher revised the questionnaire and the study protocol.

The data collectors for this study were five postgraduate medical students and eight medical staff, who were received uniform training before the start of the study. Age-eligible patients were first screened in a computerized system, and then we further evaluated our inclusion and exclusion criteria on the wards. After obtaining informed consent, investigators collected questionnaire data through face-to-face, one-on-one personal interviews on the ward, during which the investigator read each question aloud and objectively marked the participant’s answers on the questionnaire. At the end of the survey, we removed questionnaires with incomplete answers.

Statistical analysis

EpiData 3.1 software was used to establish the database, and data were entered independently by two researchers. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 and Amos 28.0 software. A P-value < 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant.

We analyzed descriptive statistics for general information and key study variables. As the distributions of age, TFI score, GOHAI score, and MNA-SF score were skewed, these continuous variables were described using the median (interquartile range [IQR]). Categorical variables were expressed as frequency (percentage). To meet the assumptions of the mediation model [35], Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to examine the general relationships between the four variables: dysphagia, self-perceived oral health, self-reported nutritional status, and frailty. Multivariate linear regression analyses were used to determine the influencing factors of frailty, which were used as covariates in mediation analysis.

An SEM was constructed using maximum-likelihood estimator in Amos 28.0 software to test the hypothesized model. In the mediation model, the relationship between two variables was expressed as path standardized coefficient (β); the effect of mediation was expressed as standardized effect, with the direct effect equal to the path standardized coefficient from dysphagia to frailty, and indirect effects of dysphagia on frailty via the mediators (self-perceived oral health or self-reported nutritional status) were equal to the multiplication of each of the path standardized coefficients. The total effect is equal to the direct effect plus the indirect effect. The mediating effect is the value of the direct or indirect effect as a percentage of the total effect. Hayes’ bias-corrected bootstrap [36] was used to examine the total, direct, and indirect effects in the model. We set the bootstrap confidence interval (CI) at 95%, and the number of bootstrap samples was 5,000. If the 95%CI for the indirect effects did not contain zero, and P-values < 0.05, it indicated that the mediating effect was significant. Because SEM samples greater than 200 or more easily caused by the χ2 value is too large resulting in poor fit, so the Bollen-Stine Bootstrap correction model fit was used for the model [37]. The model fit indices included the Bollen-Stine chi-square value/degree of freedom (χ2/df, < 5.00), goodness-of-ft index (GFI, >0.90), adjusted goodness-of-ft index (AGFI, >0.90), comparative fit index (CFI, >0.90), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI, >0.90), and root mean square error approximation (RMSEA, < 0.08) [38].

Common method biases

In this study, Harman’s single-factor test for common method bias was used [39]. The result of the unrotated factors showed that the eigenvalues of 11 factors were greater than 1, suggesting that more than one factor underlies the data. The variance explained by the first factor was 24.05%, which was less than the threshold of 40%. The above analysis indicated that there were no serious common method biases in our study.

Ethical aspects

This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital (Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China), and the approval number of the Ethics Committee was 2021R001. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal guardians at recruitment. In this study, all data collected, processed, and analyzed were anonymous and used only for the research purposes.

Results

Characteristics of the participants

A total of 1200 questionnaires were finally distributed, of which 980 valid questionnaires were included in our study, for a response rate of 81.7%. Of the 980 participants, a higher proportion of men (52.1%) than women (47.9%) participated in the survey. The age range was 65–99 years with a median of 72 years (IQR: 68–78). The vast majority of patients were married (87.0%). Among educational level, high school accounted for the highest percentage (30.7%), and the lowest was primary school or below (13.3%). Physical exercise, sleep disorders, constipation, comorbidy, polypharmacy, and denture use accounted for 49.9%, 45.4%, 34.5%, 78.8%, 50.3%, and 35.4% respectively. The prevalence of frailty was 49.1%, and dysphagia was 14.7%. The scores of frailty, self-perceived oral health, and self-reported nutritional status were 4 (3–7), 54 (48–57), and 12 (10–13), respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Description of the sample
Full size table

Correlation between dysphagia, self-perceived oral health, self-reported nutritional status and frailty

The correlation matrix for the key study variables was shown in Table 2. First, dysphagia was significantly positively correlated with frailty (r = 0.421). Second, self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status were significantly negatively correlated with frailty, with correlation coefficients of 0.561 and 0.556, respectively. Third, self-perceived oral health may promote the development of self-reported nutritional status (r = 0.474). Finally, dysphagia was negatively correlated with self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status, with correlation coefficients of 0.432 and 0.323, respectively. The results of the correlation analysis suggested that there may be some mediating effects between the above variables.

Table 2 Correlation between dysphagia, self-perceived oral health, self-reported nutritional status and frailty
Full size table

Mediating effect analysis

The model (Fig. 2) controlled eight variables for frailty: age, marital status, educational level, physical exercise, sleep disorders, constipation, comorbidity, and polypharmacy according to the result of the multivariate linear regression analysis of frailty (see additional file 1). The proposed mediation model showed acceptable goodness of fit (Bollen-Stine χ2/df = 1.057, GFI = 0.981, AGFI = 1.152, CFI = 0.999, TLI = 0.998, and RMSEA = 0.074).

Figure 2; Table 3 presented the results of the path analysis of the variables. The path standardized coefficients (β) showed that all relationships in the model were significantly correlated. Specifically, the effect of dysphagia on frailty was significant (β = 0.161, SE = 0.037, P<0.001), indicating that dysphagia was associated with frailty in hospitalized older patients. Dysphagia was negatively associated with self-perceived oral health (β=-0.511, SE = 0.032, P<0.001) and self-reported nutritional status (β=-0.138, SE = 0.039, P<0.001), suggesting that hospitalized older patients with dysphagia are more likely to have oral health problems and malnutrition. Similarly, self-perceived oral health had a positive effect on self-reported nutritional status (β = 0.415, SE = 0.036, P<0.001). In addition, the association between self-perceived oral health (β=-0.331, SE = 0.043, P<0.001), self-reported nutritional status (β=-0.361, SE = 0.037, P<0.001) and frailty was negative.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A serial mediation model of the association between dysphagia and frailty. Note: *P-value<0.001 (two-tailed). Covariates for frailty were age, marital status, educational level, physical exercise, sleep disorders, constipation, comorbidity, and polypharmacy

Full size image
Table 3 Path analysis of the model
Full size table

Table 4 presented the bootstrap analysis results of the mediating effect of self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status in the relationship between dysphagia and frailty. The 95%CIs of the total effect, direct effect and indirect effects did not contain zero. Therefore, the association between dysphagia and frailty was serially mediated by these two mediators. The standardized effect of dysphagia on frailty through self-perceived oral health was 0.169, with a mediating effect of 36.98%. The standardized effect of dysphagia on frailty through self-reported nutritional status was 0.050, with a mediating effect of 10.94%. The standardized effect of dysphagia on frailty through self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status was 0.077, with a mediating effect of 16.85%. The total mediating effect of dysphagia on frailty was 64.77%, which was stronger than the direct effect of dysphagia on frailty.

Table 4 Bootstrap analysis of Total, direct, and indirect effects
Full size table

Discussion

The prevalence of frailty among hospitalized older patients in our study was 49.1%, which was higher than in a previous study (29.8% in hospitals) [4]. This may be due to an increase in the prevalence of frailty in older adults as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic [40]. The current study mainly found that dysphagia was positively associated with frailty directly, and also indirectly through self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status.

The direct effect of dysphagia on frailty

This study confirmed that dysphagia had a direct effect on frailty in hospitalized older patients with an effect size of 35.23%, validating H1. The direct effect of dysphagia on frailty was consistent with previous studies [12, 13, 41, 42]. With age, atrophy of swallowing muscles and reduced elasticity of connective tissues may cause impaired strength and ductility of swallowing, making older adults vulnerable to dysphagia [43]. Dysphagia can lead to inadequate energy and nutrient intake in older patients, resulting in weight loss, decreased muscle strength, easy fatigue, and other indicators of frailty [12]. In addition, aspiration, a complication of dysphagia, is also an important trigger of frailty. When dysphagia exists in older adults, respiratory and swallowing functions are uncoordinated, making choking and aspiration easy, allowing oral colonizing bacteria to enter the lungs and develop pulmonary inflammation [44]. While inflammatory biomarkers are important emerging markers of frailty [45]. Research has shown that frailty prevention strategies, including swallowing training, may be helpful for older adults [42]. However, in our study, the total mediating effect was 64.77%, which was stronger than the direct effect, revealing that our mediators were crucial in explaining the association between dysphagia and frailty.

The mediation effect of self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status

Our findings showed that self-perceived oral health mediated the relationship between dysphagia and frailty with a mediating effect of 36.98%. Thus, H2 was supported: hospitalized older patients with dysphagia were more likely to suffer from frailty due to poor oral health. With the increase of age, the basic structure and physiological function of the oral cavity undergoes degenerative changes that can lead to a variety of oral health problems. Poor oral health may be linked to frailty through four mechanisms: malnutrition, chronic inflammation, psychosocial factors, and medication effects [14]. The worse the oral health, the more likely older patients are to be frail. Frailty is not only affected by oral health, but also has a negative impact on oral health, forming a vicious cycle [46]. Dysphagia may result in poor bolus clearance, oral residue and poor saliva management in patients, which are likely to contribute to poorer oral health [47]. Oral hygiene interventions could effectively improve the oral health of patients with dysphagia [47]. Our study found that self-perceived oral health played the strongest mediating role in the association between dysphagia and frailty, suggesting the importance of oral health management for older patients with dysphagia.

Our results showed that self-repored nutritional status was a mediator in the association between dysphagia and frailty, with a mediating effect of 10.94%. Therefore, H3 was tested that hospitalized older patients with dysphagia were more inclined to become frailty because of malnutrition. In the first part of this mediation process, dysphagia was negatively associated with self-reported nutritional status, which was consistent with previous studies [13, 20]. Dysphagia can lead to malnutrition in older adults with limited food intake and poor diet quality [48]. At the same time, nutritional supplementation could counteract sarcopenic dysphagia [49]. In the second part of this mediation process, self-reported nutritional status was negatively associated with frailty, similar to prior research [18]. Malnourished people generally lack sufficient protein, vitamins (B6, B12, D, etc.) and minerals, which may cause loss of muscle mass and muscle strength, thus promoting the process of frailty in older adults [50]. Nutritional deficiencies can also reduce immune function, increasing the risk of infection and complications and exacerbating frailty. The use of tailored foods and supplements, combined with dietary education, has improved frailty in older adults [51]. The Mediterranean diet is currently considered by international guidelines to be an appropriate dietary pattern for frailty [52].

The serial multiple mediation model of self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status

The present study also verified that self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status played a serial mediating role in the effect of dysphagia on frailty in hospitalized older patients, confirming H4. The mediation effect was 16.85%. The results of this study demonstrated that dysphagia first had a negative correlation with self-perceived oral health and then caused a decline in self-reported nutritional status, which in turn was associated with frailty. Poor oral health and malnutrition were associated with dysphagia. Besides, poor oral health has been identified as a risk factor for malnutrition [53, 54]. Missing teeth, dental caries, dysgeusia, periodontal disease, etc. reduce chewing function of older adults, decrease the intake of food and nutrients, aggravate the gastrointestinal burden, resulting in malnutrition [55, 56]. Older adults with dysphagia often experience serious oral health problems, which is a risk factor for poor nutritional status and ultimately increases the likelihood of frailty.

Implications for practice

The major contribution of our study was the finding that dysphagia could both directly and indirectly affect frailty via self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status in hospitalized older patients. Therefore, patients with dysphagia could prevent and delay frailty by improving oral health and nutritional status. First, a simple and effective screening tool for dysphagia, such as the EAT-10 combined with the WST [29], can be used in the clinic, and older adults with a problematic initial screening can be further examined for confirmation and prompt swallowing function training. Second, we should be concerned about the oral health of patients with dysphagia. Provide timely oral health education and oral training [57, 58]. Last but not least, it is important to enhance the assessment of nutritional status of older adults with dysphagia, along with dietary interventions and health education [49, 59]. The current findings had practical implications for the management of frailty.

Limitations and future research

Our study has several limitations. First, the cross-sectional nature hindered the definitive establishment of causality, and future research should include longitudinal or experimental studies. Second, only one hospital was selected and convenience sampling was used for this study, and the exclusion of some patients with severe mouth-opening difficulties that overestimated oral health status, which may limit the generalizability of our findings. Expansion of the study population is recommended. Third, except for dysphagia, where subjective and objective measures were used, all other variables were self-reported measures with potentially biased values. Because of the scale question settings, no relevant physical examination was performed, and the health status of older adults is likely to be overestimated to the extent that TFI scores are low, GOHAI scores are high, and MNA-SF scores are high. The use objective indicators could overcome the common problems of questionnaires. Finally, our study only tested the specific mediating pathways described above, without considering other possible mediators, nor did it consider whether there were moderators that might influence the role of oral health and nutritional status in the relationship between dysphagia and frailty. Other potential mechanisms should be further explored.

Conclusion

In conclusion, dysphagia had a significant positive effect on frailty in Chinese hospitalized older patients, with self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status playing partial mediating roles. Considering the relationship between dysphagia and frailty via self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status, it is possible that hospitalized older patients with good oral health and nutritional status may be better able to cope with dysphagia and thus delay the onset of frailty. The results of this study provide directions for further research to understand the relationship between dysphagia and frailty in older adults, which may inform future frailty management.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Abbreviations

TFI:

Tilburg Frailty Indicators

EAT-10:

Eating Assessment Tool-10

WST:

30mL Water Swallow Test

GOHAI:

Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index

MNA-SF:

Short-Form Mini-Nutritional Assessment

SEM:

Structural equation model

COVID-19:

Corona Virus Disease 2019

BMI:

Body mass index

IQR:

Interquartile range

β:

Standardized coefficients

CI:

Confidence interval

χ 2/df:

Chi-square value/degree of freedom

GFI:

Goodness-of-ft index

AGFI:

Adjusted goodness-of-ft index

CFI:

Comparative fit index

TLI:

Tucker-Lewis index

RMSEA:

Root mean square error of approximation

SE:

Standard error

References

  1. World Health Organization, Ageing. and health. 2021. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Accessed 23 Nov 2022.

  2. Lee H, Lee E, Jang IY. Frailty and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(3):e16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, Kowal P, Onder G, Fried LP. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1365–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Veronese N, Custodero C, Cella A, Demurtas J, Zora S, Maggi S, Barbagallo M, Sabbà C, Ferrucci L, Pilotto A. Prevalence of multidimensional frailty and pre-frailty in older people in different settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;72:101498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tian P, Yang N, Hao QK, Peng CM. Epidemiological characteristics of frailty in Chinese elderly population: a systematic review. Chin J Evidence-Based Med. 2019;19(6):656–64.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rohrmann S. Epidemiology of Frailty in Older people. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1216:21–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang YL, Chen H, Chen HJ. Research on the status quo and influencing factors of frailty among the elderly in the community. Chin Clin Nurs. 2022;14(4):203–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ensrud KE, Kats AM, Schousboe JT, Taylor BC, Vo TN, Cawthon PM, Hoffman AR, Langsetmo L. Osteoporotic fractures in men study (MrOS). Frailty phenotype and Healthcare costs and utilization in older men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(9):2034–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Petermann-Rocha F, Hanlon P, Gray SR, Welsh P, Gill JMR, Foster H, Katikireddi SV, Lyall D, Mackay DF, O’Donnell CA, et al. Comparison of two different frailty measurements and risk of hospitalisation or death from COVID-19: findings from UK Biobank. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Junius-Walker U, Onder G, Soleymani D, Wiese B, Albaina O, Bernabei R, Marzetti E, ADVANTAGE JA WP4 group. The essence of frailty: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis on frailty concepts and definitions. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;56:3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chinese Geriatrics Society. Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Geriatrics. Chinese expert consensus on prevention of frailty in the elderly(2022). Chin J Geriatr. 2022;41(5):503–11.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bahat G, Yilmaz O, Durmazoglu S, Kilic C, Tascioglu C, Karan MA. Association between Dysphagia and Frailty in Community Dwelling older adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(6):571–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nishida T, Yamabe K, Honda S. The influence of Dysphagia on Nutritional and Frailty Status among Community-Dwelling older adults. Nutrients. 2021;13(2):512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Shwe PS, Ward SA, Thein PM, Junckerstorff R. Frailty, oral health and nutrition in geriatrics inpatients: a cross-sectional study. Gerodontology. 2019;36(3):223–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hakeem FF, Bernabé E, Sabbah W. Association between oral health and frailty: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Gerodontology. 2019;36(3):205–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Poisson P, Laffond T, Campos S, Dupuis V, Bourdel-Marchasson I. Relationships between oral health, dysphagia and undernutrition in hospitalised elderly patients. Gerodontology. 2016;33(2):161–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ni Lochlainn M, Cox NJ, Wilson T, Hayhoe RPG, Ramsay SE, Granic A, Isanejad M, Roberts HC, Wilson D, Welch C, et al. Nutrition and Frailty: opportunities for Prevention and Treatment. Nutrients. 2021;13(7):2349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hong X, Yan J, Xu L, Shen S, Zeng X, Chen L. Relationship between nutritional status and frailty in hospitalized older patients [J]. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:105–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mañas-Martínez AB, Bucar-Barjud M, Campos-Fernández J, Gimeno-Orna JA, Pérez-Calvo J, Ocón-Bretón J. Association of positive screening for dysphagia with nutritional status and long-term mortality in hospitalized elderly patients. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2018;65(7):402–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jardine M, Miles A, Allen J. Self-reported swallowing and Nutrition Status in Community-living older adults. Dysphagia. 2021;36(2):198–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hakeem FF, Bernabé E, Fadel HT, Sabbah W. Association between oral health and Frailty among older adults in Madinah, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(9):975–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu SS, Ling WQ. Multiple mediation models and their applications. J Psychol Sci. 2009;32(2):433–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Westland JC. Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2010;9:476–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu X, Zhao Y, Wu B, Pei Y, Gu D. Association between tooth loss and frailty among Chinese older adults: the mediating role of dietary diversity. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1):668.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gobbens RJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010;11(5):344–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Xi X, Guo GF, Sun J. Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Tilburg Frailty Indicator. J Nurs. 2013;20(16):1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117(12):919–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hou P, Deng H, Wu Z, Liu H, Liu N, Zheng Z, Chen P. Detection of salivary aspiration using radionuclide salivagram SPECT/CT in patients with COPD exacerbation: a preliminary study. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(10):2730–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Expert Consensus Group on Rehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of Dysphagia in China. (2017 edition). Chin J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 39(12): 881– 92.

  30. Zhang PP, Yuan Y, Lu DZ, Li TT, Zhang H, Wang HY, Wang XW. Diagnostic accuracy of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) in screening dysphagia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Dysphagia. 2023;38(1):145–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Atchison KA, Dolan TA. Development of the geriatric oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ. 1990;54(11):680–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ling JQ, Wang AD. Development of the Chinese version of geriatric oral health assessment index(GOHAI). Chin J Geriat Stomatol. 2003;1(3):129–33.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rubenstein LZ, Harker JO, Salvà A, Guigoz Y, Vellas B. Screening for undernutrition in geriatric practice: developing the short-form mini-nutritional assessment (MNA-SF). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(6):M366–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. He YL, Jian ZJ, Ou YM, Peng W. Comparison between MNA and MNA-SF in evaluation of nutritional status of the elderly. Pract Geriatr. 2004;18(5):243–5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hayes AF. Beyond Baron, Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76:408–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bollen KA, Stine RA. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociol Methods Res. 1992;21(2):205–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McDonald RP, Ho MH. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):64–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yokoro M, Otaki N, Yano M, Imamura T, Tanino N, Fukuo K. Low Dietary Variety is Associated with Incident Frailty in older adults during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic: a prospective cohort study in Japan. Nutrients. 2023;15(5):1145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang RY, Yang AY, Chen YC, Lee SD, Lee SH, Chen JW. Association between Dysphagia and Frailty in older adults: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2022;14(9):1812.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Nishida T, Yamabe K, Honda S. Dysphagia is associated with oral, physical, cognitive and psychological frailty in Japanese community-dwelling elderly persons. Gerodontology. 2020;37(2):185–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tao Y, Guo HH, Yi HY, Li MX, Zhang CH. Analysis of the correlation between oral frailty and physical frailty in the elderly. Chin J Prev Control Chronic Dis. 2022;30(12):957–60.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Asakawa M, Takeshita T, Furuta M, Kageyama S, Takeuchi K, Hata J, Ninomiya T, Yamashita Y. Tongue microbiota and oral Health Status in Community-Dwelling Elderly adults. mSphere. 2018;3(4):e00332–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Picca A, Coelho-Junior HJ, Calvani R, Marzetti E, Vetrano DL. Biomarkers shared by frailty and sarcopenia in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;73:101530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen CY, Shen Q. Association between oral health and frailty in the elderly: a literature review. J Nurs Admin. 2020;20(6):438–43.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Murray J, Scholten I. An oral hygiene protocol improves oral health for patients in inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Gerodontology. 2018;35(1):18–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lim Y, Kim C, Park H, Kwon S, Kim O, Kim H, Lee Y. Socio-demographic factors and diet-related characteristics of community-dwelling elderly individuals with dysphagia risk in South Korea. Nutr Res Pract. 2018;12(5):406–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. de Sire A, Ferrillo M, Lippi L, Agostini F, de Sire R, Ferrara PE, Raguso G, Riso S, Roccuzzo A, Ronconi G, et al. Sarcopenic Dysphagia, Malnutrition, and oral Frailty in Elderly: a Comprehensive Review. Nutrients. 2022;14(5):982.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Artaza-Artabe I, Sáez-López P, Sánchez-Hernández N, Fernández-Gutierrez N, Malafarina V. The relationship between nutrition and frailty: effects of protein intake, nutritional supplementation, vitamin D and exercise on muscle metabolism in the elderly. A systematic review. Maturitas. 2016;93:89–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wu SY, Hsu LL, Hsu CC, Hsieh TJ, Su SC, Peng YW, Guo TM, Kang YW, Pan WH. Dietary education with customised dishware and food supplements can reduce frailty and improve mental well-being in elderly people: a single-blind randomized controlled study. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2018;27(5):1018–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dent E, Morley JE, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Woodhouse L, Rodríguez-Mañas L, Fried LP, Woo J, Aprahamian I, Sanford A, Lundy J, et al. Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice guidelines for Identification and Management. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(9):771–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Toniazzo MP, Amorim PS, Muniz F, Weidlich P. Relationship of nutritional status and oral health in elderly: systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(3):824–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Castrejón-Pérez RC, Jiménez-Corona A, Bernabé E, Villa-Romero AR, Arrivé E, Dartigues JF, Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, Borges-Yáñez SA. Oral disease and 3-Year incidence of Frailty in Mexican older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72(7):951–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Azzolino D, Passarelli PC, De Angelis P, Piccirillo GB, D’Addona A, Cesari M. Poor oral health as a determinant of Malnutrition and Sarcopenia. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):2898.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Gaewkhiew P, Sabbah W, Bernabé E. Does tooth loss affect dietary intake and nutritional status? A systematic review of longitudinal studies. J Dent. 2017;67:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen HJ, Chen JL, Chen CY, Lee M, Chang WH, Huang TT. Effect of an Oral Health Programme on oral health, oral intake, and Nutrition in patients with stroke and Dysphagia in Taiwan: a Randomised Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(12):2228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Shirobe M, Watanabe Y, Tanaka T, Hirano H, Kikutani T, Nakajo K, Sato T, Furuya J, Minakuchi S, Iijima K. Effect of an oral Frailty measures Program on Community-Dwelling Elderly people: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Gerontology. 2022;68(4):377–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ueshima J, Momosaki R, Shimizu A, Motokawa K, Sonoi M, Shirai Y, Uno C, Kokura Y, Shimizu M, Nishiyama A, et al. Nutritional Assessment in Adult patients with Dysphagia: a scoping review. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants and the staff of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital for their cooperation.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Basic Research Project of Shaanxi Province (2022JQ-925), the Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital Incubation Fund (2021YJY-03), and the Department of Science and Technology of Shaanxi Province (2020ZDLSF01-08). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 76 Yanta West Road, 710061, Xi’an, China

    Jianjiao Yu

  2. Department of Geriatrics, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, 256 Youyi West Road, 710068, Xi’an, China

    Huolan Zhu

  3. Shaanxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Medicine, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, 256 Youyi West Road, 710068, Xi’an, China

    Huolan Zhu

  4. Director’s Office, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, 256 Youyi West Road, 710068, Xi’an, China

    Yulian Zhang

  5. Department of Nursing, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, 256 Youyi West Road, 710068, Xi’an, China

    Dan Wang, Hua Guo & Xiaomei Liu

  6. School of Nursing, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xixian Road, 712046, Xi’an, China

    Jin Lai

  7. School of Nursing, Yan’an University, 580 Shengdi Road, 716000, Yan’an, China

    Huiying Zhang, Huanhuan Xu & Bingyue Bai

Authors
  1. Jianjiao Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huolan Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yulian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hua Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaomei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jin Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Huiying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Huanhuan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Bingyue Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.Y. and H.Z. came up with the idea. D.W., H.G. and X.L. were responsible for contacting the departments and obtaining the cooperation of the medical staff. J.Y., J.L., H.X. and B.B. participated in data collection. J.Y. and H.Z. conducted the statistical analysis. J.Y. drafted the manuscript. H.Z. and Y.Z. provided many valuable comments on the draft and made revisions. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Huolan Zhu or Yulian Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was established in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital (Approval number: 2021R001). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal guardians at recruitment. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, J., Zhu, H., Zhang, Y. et al. The relationship between dysphagia and frailty among Chinese hospitalized older patients: a serial mediation model through self-perceived oral health and self-reported nutritional status. BMC Geriatr 24, 110 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04684-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04684-0

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us