Skip to main content
Download PDF

Associations between resting heart rate and cognitive decline in Chinese oldest old individuals: a longitudinal cohort study

BMC Geriatrics volume 24, Article number: 14 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The trajectories of cognitive function in the oldest old individuals is unclear, and the relationship between resting heart rate (RHR) and cognitive decline is controversial.

Methods

3300 participants who had cognitive function repeatedly measured 4 ~ 8 times were included, and latent class growth mixed models were used to identified the cognitive function trajectories. Cognitive decline was defined by the trajectory shapes, considering level and slope. After excluding individuals with sinus rhythm abnormal, 3109 subjects were remained and were divided into five groups by their RHR. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the relationship between RHR and cognitive decline.

Results

Three distinct cognitive function trajectory groups were identified: high-stable (n = 1226), medium-decreasing (n = 1526), and rapid-decreasing (n = 357). Individuals of medium/rapid-decreasing group were defined as cognitive decline. Adjusting for covariates, the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of RHR sub-groups were 1.19 (0.69, 2.05), 1.27 (1.03, 1.56), 1.30 (1.01, 1.67) and 1.62 (1.07, 2.47) for those RHR < 60 bpm, 70 ~ 79 bpm, 80 ~ 89 bpm and > 90 bpm respectively, compared with those RHR 60 ~ 69 bpm. The interaction effect between RHR and physical activity (PA) on cognitive decline was found, and stratification analysis was presented that higher RHR would only show risk effects on cognitive decline in those with physical inactivity (P < 0.05 for all).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates RHR more than 70 bpm present significant risk effect on cognitive decline, and this relationship is modified by PA. Elder population with physical inactivity and higher RHR should be paid more attention to prevent cognitive decline.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Prevalence of dementia has greatly increased for decades, causing a severe health problem [1,2,3]. Researchers have demonstrated dementia would severely affect the quality of life, especially the oldest old individuals [3]. However, no cure for dementia is effective, currently. Identifying sub-group with cognitive decline steeply, and exploring the modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline would be the best way to delay the onset of dementia [4, 5]. Previous studies have been illustrated that cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are significantly associated with the cognitive decline, because of their common risk factors [6,7,8]. Managing the risk factors of CVDs may delay the process of cognitive decline [6].

The associations between CVDs’ risk factors and cognitive decline have been well-established, such as body mass index (BMI) [7,8,9,10,11]. However, as an important risk factor of CVDs, the relationship of rest heart rate (RHR) and cognitive decline was still unclear. A few longitudinal studies have reported that higher RHR was associated with cognitive decline [6, 12, 13]. While these results were not proved by other researches [14, 15], leaving the relationship between RHR and cognition still controversial. Besides the different results, these studies usually defined cognitive decline by limited measurements, ignoring the longitudinal changing pattern in life-course [6, 12,13,14,15]. Some individuals with steep trend of decline may be misclassified because of the short duration of follow-up. We hypothesized that there are different patterns of cognitive trajectories in the oldest old people in China, and that different patterns of cognitive trajectories are closely related to RHR.

Using data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), this longitudinal research aims to identify cognitive function trajectories in the oldest old individuals (75 ~ 100 years), estimate the relationship between RHR and cognitive function trajectory groups.

Subjects and methods

Study cohort

As an ongoing cohort, Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) was implemented by the Center for Healthy Aging and Development Studies at Peking University and the Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development at Duke University, jointly [16, 17]. Since 1998, comprehensive information from elderly individuals were collected, and seven follow-up waves of data were collected in 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008, 2011, 2014 and 2018. CLHLS randomly selected half of the total number of counties and cities in 22 out of 31 provinces in mainland China, conducted covered approximately 85% of the total population of China [16, 17].

In this current study, individuals with age > 100 or age < 75 (N = 15,206), missing data in cognitive function tests (N = 109), and with less than four follow-up visits (N = 38,334) were excluded. Finally, 3300 subjects (1487 males, ages 75 to 94 years at baseline), with 4–8 times examinations data, were included in this study to identify the trajectory of cognitive function. The mean follow-up duration was 10.1 years (sd = 2.4 years). Among these 3300 individuals, 3109 subjects (1401 males, mean age = 81.5 years) whose self-reported sinus rhythm were normal at baseline formed the current longitudinal study cohort.

The CLHLS study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052-13074), and all participants or their proxy respondents provided written informed consent.

Exposure

Using standard electronic sphygmomanometer, RHR was measured after an hour rest at each follow-up in a sitting position. The peak pulse wave was recorded by the sphygmomanometer automatically during the measurement duration, and the RHR was calculated according to the number of pulse waves [18]. Participants were divided into 5 RHR categories, labeled as < 60 beats per minute (bpm), 60 ~ 69 bpm, 70 ~ 79 bpm, 80 ~ 89 bpm, and ≥ 90 bpm, and the 60 ~ 69 bpm group was defined as the reference group similar with the previous research [6].

Covariates

In this current study, sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviors and health status at baseline were adjusted in the model. These covariates were selected a priori as potential confounders based on the literature [19, 20]. The sociodemographic characteristics were age (continuous), gender, education level (no schooling/some schooling), residence (city/town/village), marital status (married/other) and cohabitant (family/solitary/live in institution). Health behaviors were current smoking status (never or past/current), current alcohol drinking (yes/no), physical activity (PA) at present (yes/no), fruit intake (yes/no) and vegetable intake (yes/no). Health status was common chronic diseases (self-reported hypertension, diabetes, cardiopathy, and stroke) and body weight (continuous). In addition, a cohort identifier was established to indicate which cohort the participants were from.

Outcome

Cognitive function was measured by the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) during each survey. The validity and reliability of the Chinese MMSE has been verified [16, 17]. Based on the literature [21], we treated responses of “unable to answer” as “wrong”. The MMSE score ranged from 0 to 30, and a higher score indicated better cognitive function. In order to identify the trajectory groups of cognitive function, a normalising transformation was applied to MMSE values, converting MMSE from a 0–30 scale to nMMSE on a 0–100 scale to deal with curvilinearity [22].

Statistical methods

The latent class growth mixture model (LCGMM) was used to identify different trajectory patterns of MMSE [23]. The latent class trajectory of MMSE was specified as a function of age (centered to 86 years, the mean age of the cohort). Multiple LCGMMs with different trajectory shapes including linear and nonlinear parameters were tested [24,25,26]. Repeated trajectory analyses were performed to identify the latent classes by changing the number of groups from 2 to 4, with the same starting values calculated from the 1-group model. The class memberships of subjects were determined by a latent discrete random variable, and its probability is described using a multinomial logistic model according to covariates. We chose the best-fitting model for MMSE trajectory according to the BIC criterion while ensuring that each group has an acceptable proportion of the population and posterior probability.

Considering the changing patterns of MMSE, subjects were divided into cognitive decline group and normal group. Logistic regression models were used to explore the associations between the resting heart rate (RHR) and cognitive decline, adjusted for baseline age, gender, residence, education level, marital status, cohabitant, smoking and alcohol drinking status, fruit and vegetable intake, self-report hypertension, self-report diabetes, self-report stroke, self-report heart disease, body weight, and PA. Moreover, the interaction effect between RHR and PA was estimated by adding an interaction term in logistic regression model. Stratification analysis was used to explore whether the RHR performed different effects on cognitive decline by the PA status.

Variables were described using mean (sd), median [interquartile range] and n (%), as appropriate. All analyses were preformed using R version 4.0.4. Hypothesis tests were 2-sided, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Supplement Table S1 summarizes LCGMM model fitting process of the MMSE trajectory. We fitted models from one class to four classes of linear, quadratic and cubic curves. According to statistical criteria above, a model of quadratic parameters with three classes was chosen as the best-fitting model. Supplement Table S2 presents parameter estimates for the best-fitting 3-class quadratic latent class growth mixed model. All the parameters were statistically significant (P < 0.05 for all).

Figure 1 shows the longitudinal trajectories of MMSE during 75 ~ 100 years old of 3300 participants. Three distinct trajectories were established, labeled as high-stable (n = 1298, 39.33%), medium-decreasing (n = 1620, 49.09%), and rapid-decreasing (n = 382, 11.58%). In the high-stable group, MMSE persisted at a high level of 23 ~ 30 score. In the medium-decreasing group, MMSE decreased gradually from 28 score up to 10 score. In the rapid-decreasing group, MMSE decreased rapidly from 27 score up to 4 score.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Predicted trajectories of cognitive function during 75–100 years old. The trajectories were shown in solid lines, and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were shown in shadow. The proportions in each trajectory were shown. (see detailed information on the curve parameters in Supplemental Table S3)

Full size image

After excluding respondents (n = 191) with arrhythmias, 3109 respondents were included in the subsequent analysis. Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics of study variables by MMSE trajectory classes. Compared with the high-stable group, the medium-decreasing group and the rapid-decreasing group were more likely single female, with higher proportion of village inhabitant, lower education level, lower proportion of smokers and alcohol drinkers, lower fruit intake, and lower proportion of PA subjects at baseline. Supplement Table S3 shows excluded respondents (n = 53,840) were generally older single females, with higher baseline body weight, lower proportion of smokers and alcohol drinkers, and lower proportion of PA subjects than those included (n = 3109).

Table 1 Characteristics at Baseline by Cognitive Function Trajectory Groups
Full size table

According to the changing pattern of MMSE, individuals in high-stable group were defined as normal cognitive function. Those in medium/rapid-decreasing group were defined as cognitive decline. Table 2 presents odds radios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the association between RHR and cognitive function status. Compared with those whose RHR between 60 and 69 time/minutes, the ORs (95% CIs) of < 60, 70 ~ 79, 80 ~ 80, and > 90 groups were 1.11 (0.70, 1.79), 1.23 (1.07, 1.52), 1.40 (1.13, 1.73), and 1.51 (1.07, 2.16) in unadjusted model, respectively. After adjustment for baseline age, gender, residence, education level, marital status, cohabitant, smoking and alcohol drinking status, fruit and vegetable intake, self-report hypertension, self-report diabetes, self-report stroke, self-report heart disease, body weight, and PA, the ORs (95% CIs) were 1.19 (0.69, 2.05), 1.27 (1.03, 1.56), 1.30 (1.01, 1.67) and 1.62 (1.07, 2.47), respectively.

Table 2 ORs (95% CIs) of Resting Heart Rate for Cognition Trajectory Groups
Full size table

The rate of cognitive function decreasing in 75 ~ 100 years old across different combined categories of RHR and PA status are presented in Fig. 2. The proportion of cognitive decline was higher in the physical inactivity groups than in the PA group with the same RHR, and an interaction effect on cognitive decline was found between RHR and PA (β70~79*physical inactivity = 0.49, P = 0.024, β>90*physical inactivity = 0.91, P = 0.037).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Rate of cognitive function decreasing in 75 ~ 100 years old, across different combined categories of RHR and physical activity status

RHR, resting heart rate

Full size image

Table 3 presents ORs and 95% CIs of the difference of the association between RHR group membership and cognitive decline in PA subjects and physical inactivity subjects. After adjustment for baseline age, gender, residence, education level, marital status, cohabitant, smoking and alcohol drinking status, fruit and vegetable intake, self-report hypertension, self-report diabetes, self-report stroke, self-report heart disease, and body weight, the ORs (95% CIs) were 1.27 (0.51, 3.16), 0.97 (0.69, 1.35), 1.23 (0.82, 1.85), and 0.97 (0.49, 1.89) for < 60, 70 ~ 79, 80 ~ 80, and > 90 groups in PA subjects, respectively (P > 0.05 for all). While these association were 1.16 (0.59, 2.31), 1.56 (1.20, 2.05), 1.38 (1.01, 1.90) and 2.38 (1.38, 4.19) in physical inactivity individuals, respectively.

Table 3 ORs (95% CIs) of Resting Heart Rate for Cognition Trajectory Groups by Physical Activity Status
Full size table

Discussion

In the current study, we identified three distinct MMSE trajectories from 75 to 100 years in macrobian Chinese population, and found the higher RHR was a significant risk factor for the decreasing of cognitive functions. Although the normal range of RHR was recognized as 60 ~ 100 bpm, our results showed that the oldest old population should control the RHR at the range from 60 to 69 bpm to reduce the risk of cognitive decline. Furthermore, we found that the relationship between RHR and cognitive decline was modified by PA status, indicated macrobian individuals without PA may be considered as high-risk group to develop cognitive decline. Our observations supported that higher RHR would rise the risk of cognitive decline steeply, and this relationship was modified by PA. More attention should be paid to control RHR in macrobian Chinese population, especially in terms of those without PA, to prevent the decreasing of cognitive functions.

In this study, three distinct trajectories for MMSE during 75 ~ 100 years were identified. In the high-stable group, cognitive functions persisted at a high level of 26 ~ 30. In the medium-decreasing group, individuals presented a decreased cognition, with MMSE from 30 to 10. In the rapid-decreasing group, this trend of decline became steeply. Previous researches, using data from America, China, Japan, Korea, and Spain identified 2–4 distinct MMSE trajectories for old people [27,28,29,30,31,32]. Although the numbers of trajectory groups were different among these studies, they all found a high-stable group and a rapid-decreasing group, which were in line with us. Moreover, those researches usually focused on the early elderly life-course, such as 50 ~ 75 years old [31]. The literatures about the oldest old individuals were still limited. Our results illustrated that in the oldest old participants, the changing patterns of cognitive functions existed heterogeneity, widely. Some studies reported that the heterogeneity could be explained by some pathologic changes [30, 33]. However, some modifiable factors would also influence the speed of cognitive decline, even though adjustment those pathologic measurements [30, 31, 34]. This indicated that cognitive decline should not be regarded as a normal consequence of aging and neuropathological changes, and the modifiable factors can contribute to varying degrees of cognitive decline.

In this study, we discovered a more than 70 bpm RHR would rise the risk of cognitive decline, compared with those whose RHR was 60 ~ 69 bpm. A few studies have explored the relationship between RHR and cognitive decline [6, 12,13,14,15, 35, 36]. However, the results were controversial. Imahori, et al. demonstrated that compared with those RHR 60 ~ 69 bpm, individuals with more than 80 bpm showed a significant hazard ratio (HR) of cognitive decline (HR and 95% CI was 1.55 [1.06, 2.66]) [6]. Another research, based on the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC), was reported the similar results [13]. These results were consistent with our observations [6, 13]. Inversely, Wod, et al. illustrated that RHR may not associate with cognitive function in general population using data from Danish [14]. However, to our knowledge, this research only used limited measurements, ignoring the longitudinal changing patterns of cognitive function [14]. In our study, we found the level of MMSE were similar in baseline within three distinct trajectory groups, but the linear slope varied widely. Some individuals with steep trend of decline may be misclassified because of the short duration of follow-up (medium-decreasing group). European and Chinese guidelines for hypertension have listed high RHR (> 80 bpm) as an independent risk factor [37]. Nevertheless, whether this criterion was suitable for the oldest old people was still unknown. Our results supported the oldest old individuals should control RHR ranging from 60 to 69 bpm, and the interventions which could control RHR may have effect of preventing cognitive decline.

In this current study, we found the association of RHR and cognitive decline was modified by PA. Higher RHR would only rise the risk of cognitive decline in those without PA. Previous researches have explored the relationship between RHR, PA, and cognitive functions [6, 38]. Zabetian-Targhi, et al. has reported that PA would improvement the cognitive functions in people with type 2 diabetes [38]. Imahori, et al. demonstrated that individuals with RHR more than 80 bpm presented a significantly higher risk of the cognitive decline, compared with those RHR 60–69 bpm [6]. These results were all in line with the current study [6, 38]. However, previous researches all focused on the relationship between PA or RHR and cognitive functions separately [6, 38], ignoring the interaction between PA and RHR on the cognition. Our results supported that PA may play a modifier in RHR-cognitive functions association, and individuals with higher RHR but never exercising may be the high-risk sub-group of cognitive decline.

There are few studies on RHR and cognitive decline, but the relationship between high RHR and cognitive dysfunction seems reasonable. Firstly, high RHR, as a risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in the general population and high-risk population, may result in reverse hypertension, atrial fibrillation and heart failure, which are also vital risk factors for dementia [7, 39,40,41]. Secondly, high RHR is a sign of sympathetic hyperactivity [42]. Indeed, sympathetic overactivity may contribute to CVD (ventricular arrhythmias and myocardial ischemic events) and non-CVD (obesity, dyslipidemia, etc.) [40, 43], which are risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia. Thirdly, high RHR is related to the incidence and progression of vascular oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis [44, 45]. The hemodynamic changes caused by the above factors may cause cognitive impairment through vasculitis change, cerebral circulation insufficiency, microthrombosis and other ways [7]. Besides, some studies reveal that reducing RHR can not only inhibit the formation of atherosclerotic plaques, but also promote the growth of vascular collateral circulation and protect vascular endothelium, which provides a possible basis for controlling heart rate and delaying the decline of cognitive function [46,47,48].

There are some strengths in the current study. Firstly, with large sample size and repeated measurements, CLHLS is a community-based longitudinal study. It allows us to identify the distinct trajectory groups of cognitive functions. Secondly, we discovered the association of RHR and cognitive decline was modified by PA, which could provide evidences for identifying the high-risk sub-groups of cognitive decline in oldest old people. Moreover, our study focused on the oldest old individuals, whose aged over 75 years old. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the relationship between RHR and cognition decline in Chinese community individuals.

On the other hand, some limitations should be acknowledged. Firstly, the definition of cardiovascular diseases was relying on self-reported data, which means we could not identify those with subclinical diseases. It may influence the relationship between RHR and cognitive decline. Secondly, although we adjusted covariates as we can in our models, unobserved confounders might still influence the results. For instance, information about BMI of participants were not available because the height was not collected in the first four follow-up. We could only adjust the body weight in the logistic models to reduce the bias caused by BMI. Thirdly, the information about physical activity was collected by questionnaire, and the information bias may exist. Besides, the data of exercise intensity and exercise duration were unavailable in the current study, further researchers should explore the relationship of RHR, PA, and cognitive decline based on more detailed data about PA. Finally, the CLHLS was a survey concentrating on Chinese old population. Our results may not be generalizable to other ethnic population.

Conclusion

In conclusion, compared to those with RHR 60 ~ 69 bpm, individuals with a more than 70 bpm RHR presented a higher risk of cognitive decline rapidly, and this association was modified by PA. Our findings provide evidence that elder people with higher RHR but never exercise may be the high-risk subgroup of cognitive decline. Public health intervention for controlling RHR and encouraging PA during the oldest old life-course has important significance on the prevention of cognitive decline.

Availability of data and materials

Data availability statement Data are available in a public, open access repository from The Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (https://opendata.pku.edu.cn/dataverse/CHADS).

References

  1. Jia L, et al. Dementia in China: epidemiology, clinical management, and research advances. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(1):81–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aarsland D. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of dementia-related psychosis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81(5):8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aranda MP, et al. Impact of Dementia: Health disparities, population trends, care interventions, and economic costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(7):1774–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Delgado-Saborit JM, et al. A critical review of the epidemiological evidence of effects of air pollution on Dementia, cognitive function and cognitive decline in adult population. Sci Total Environ. 2021;757:143734.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Livingston G, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;396(10248):413–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Imahori Y, et al. Association of resting heart rate with cognitive decline and Dementia in older adults: a population-based cohort study. Alzheimers Dement; 2021.

  7. Abete P, et al. Cognitive impairment and Cardiovascular Diseases in the elderly. A heart-brain continuum hypothesis. Ageing Res Rev. 2014;18:41–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cortes-Canteli M, Iadecola C. Alzheimer’s Disease and Vascular Aging: JACC Focus Seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(8):942–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Samaras K, et al. Metformin Use is Associated with slowed cognitive decline and reduced Incident Dementia in older adults with type 2 Diabetes: the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(11):2691–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Dalen JW, et al. Association of systolic blood pressure with Dementia risk and the role of Age, U-Shaped associations, and Mortality. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182(2):142–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kao YC et al. Lipids and Alzheimer’s Disease. Int J Mol Sci, 2020. 21(4).

  12. Longinetti E, et al. Heart rate, intelligence in adolescence, and Parkinson’s Disease later in life. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021;36(10):1055–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang S, et al. Relation of elevated resting heart rate in Mid-life to Cognitive decline over 20 years (from the Atherosclerosis risk in communities [ARIC] Study). Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(2):334–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wod M, et al. Resting heart rate is not Associated with cognitive function. Neuroepidemiology. 2018;50(3–4):160–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haring B, et al. Heart rate, brain imaging biomarkers and cognitive impairment in older (≥ 63 years) women. Am J Cardiol. 2020;129:102–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lv YB, et al. Revisiting the association of blood pressure with mortality in oldest old people in China: community based, longitudinal prospective study. BMJ. 2018;361:k2158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeng Y, et al. Survival, disabilities in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: a cohort study. Lancet. 2017;389(10079):1619–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheng X, et al. [The relationship between resting heart rate and all-cause mortality among the Chinese oldest-old aged more than 80: a prospective cohort study]. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021;55(1):53–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Langa KM, et al. Trends in the prevalence and mortality of cognitive impairment in the United States: is there evidence of a compression of cognitive morbidity? Alzheimers Dement. 2008;4(2):134–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dewey ME, Saz P. Dementia, cognitive impairment and mortality in persons aged 65 and over living in the community: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001;16(8):751–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Z, Gu D, Hayward MD. Childhood nutritional deprivation and cognitive impairment among older Chinese people. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(5):941–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Philipps V, et al. Normalized Mini-mental State examination for assessing cognitive change in population-based brain aging studies. Neuroepidemiology. 2014;43(1):15–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Proust-Lima C, Philipps V, Liquet B. Estimation of extended mixed models using latent classes and latent processes: the R Package lcmm. J Stat Softw. 2017;78(2):1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lv J et al. Trajectories of early to mid-life adulthood BMI and incident Diabetes: the China Health and Nutrition Survey. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 2020. 8(1).

  25. Fan B, et al. Body Mass Index trajectories during Young Adulthood and Incident Hypertension: a longitudinal cohort in Chinese Population. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(8):e011937.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Qu Y, et al. Joint trajectories of body mass index and waist circumference in early-life to mid-life adulthood and incident Hypertension: the China Health and Nutrition Survey. BMJ Open. 2022;12(5):e059556.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Han JW, et al. Association of vascular brain injury, neurodegeneration, amyloid, and cognitive trajectory. Neurology. 2020;95(19):e2622–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen CI, Reisberg B, Yaffee R. Global cognitive trajectory patterns in Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr, 2022: p. 1–10.

  29. Heshmatollah A, et al. Long-term trajectories of decline in cognition and daily functioning before and after Stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92(11):1158–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Rheenen TE, et al. Current understandings of the trajectory and emerging correlates of cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: an overview of evidence. Bipolar Disord. 2020;22(1):13–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li H, et al. Associations between social and intellectual activities with cognitive trajectories in Chinese middle-aged and older adults: a nationally representative cohort study. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020;12(1):115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lobo E et al. Differences in trajectories and predictive factors of Cognition over Time in a sample of cognitively healthy adults, in Zaragoza, Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021. 18(13).

  33. Karanth SD, et al. Four common late-life cognitive trajectories patterns associate with replicable underlying neuropathologies. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;82(2):647–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu L, et al. Residual decline in cognition after adjustment for common neuropathologic conditions. Neuropsychology. 2015;29(3):335–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Hare C, Kuh D, Hardy R. Association of early-life factors with life-course trajectories of resting heart rate: more than 6 decades of follow-up. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(4):e175525.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Faust L, et al. Deviations from normal bedtimes are associated with short-term increases in resting heart rate. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Williams B, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial Hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zabetian-Targhi F, et al. The Association between Physical Activity Intensity, Cognition, and Brain structure in people with type 2 Diabetes. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021;76(11):2047–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dyer AR, et al. Heart rate as a prognostic factor for coronary Heart Disease and mortality: findings in three Chicago epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1980;112(6):736–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bangalore S, et al. The association of admission heart rate and in-hospital cardiovascular events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from 135 164 patients in the CRUSADE quality improvement initiative. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(5):552–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Böhm M, et al. Heart rate as a risk factor in chronic Heart Failure (SHIFT): the association between heart rate and outcomes in a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):886–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Johansen CD, et al. Resting, night-time, and 24 h heart rate as markers of cardiovascular risk in middle-aged and elderly men and women with no apparent Heart Disease. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(23):1732–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ceconi C, et al. The heart rate story. Eur Heart J Supplements. 2011;13(C):C4–C13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nanchen D, et al. Resting heart rate and incident Heart Failure and cardiovascular mortality in older adults: role of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction: the PROSPER study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013;15(5):581–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Han D, et al. Associations between elevated resting heart rate and subclinical Atherosclerosis in asymptomatic Korean adults undergoing coronary artery calcium scoring. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;32(10):1587–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Custodis F, et al. Vascular pathophysiology in response to increased heart rate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(24):1973–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Custodis F, et al. Heart rate reduction by ivabradine reduces oxidative stress, improves endothelial function, and prevents Atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation. 2008;117(18):2377–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schirmer SH, et al. Heart-rate reduction by If-channel inhibition with ivabradine restores collateral artery growth in hypercholesterolemic Atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(10):1223–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the study participants, medical staff at Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), and the CLHLS research group for their invaluable contributions to data collection and management.

Funding

This work was supported by Primary Research & Development Plan of Shandong Province (Grant No.2016GSF121044) and Shandong National Science Foundation (ZR2022MH111).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhaoyin Ma and Yanlin Qu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Jinan Central Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Zhaoyin Ma & Haibo Ma

  2. Medical Integration and Practice Center, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Zhaoyin Ma

  3. Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

    Yanlin Qu

  4. National Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Shanghai, China

    Yanlin Qu

  5. Department of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Haibo Ma

  6. Department of Neurology, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Yuanyuan Zhang, Min Wang & Nana Huang

  7. Medical Integration and Practice Center, Jinan Central Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaohong Li

Authors
  1. Zhaoyin Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yanlin Qu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haibo Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuanyuan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Min Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nana Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaohong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Zhaoyin Ma, Yanlin Qu and Xiaohong Li designed the study. Zhaoyin Ma, Yanlin Qu, Haibo Ma and Nana Huang contributed to data collection. Yanlin Qu analyzed the data. Zhaoyin Ma drafted the manuscript. Yuanyuan Zhang, Min Wang and Xiaohong Li supervised the study. All authors made critical revisions for important intellectual content and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohong Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The CLHLS study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052-13074), and all participants or their proxy respondents provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Z., Qu, Y., Ma, H. et al. Associations between resting heart rate and cognitive decline in Chinese oldest old individuals: a longitudinal cohort study. BMC Geriatr 24, 14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04600-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04600-y

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us