Skip to main content
Download PDF

Context of walking and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study

BMC Geriatrics volume 23, Article number: 326 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Older adults are more likely to experience loneliness than younger people. Moreover, greater loneliness in older adults is associated with poor mental health and increased risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Physical activity is an effective intervention for reducing loneliness among older adults. Among physical activities, walking is suitable for older adults, because it is easy and safe to incorporate into daily life. We hypothesized that the association between walking and loneliness depends on the presence of others and the number of people present. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between the context of walking (the number of walkers) and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 173 community-dwelling older adults aged 65 or older. Context of walking was classified as non-walking, walking alone (days of walking alone > days of walking with someone), and walking with someone (days of walking alone ≤ days of walking with someone). Loneliness was measured using the Japanese version of the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale. A linear regression model was used to investigate the relationship between context of walking and loneliness, adjusted for age, sex, living situation, social participation, and physical activity excluding walking.

Results

Data from 171 community-dwelling older adults (mean age = 78.0 years, 59.6% women) were analyzed. After adjustment, walking with someone was associated with lower loneliness than non-walking (adjusted β: -0.51, 95% confidence interval: -1.00, -0.01).

Conclusions

The study’s findings suggest that walking with a companion may effectively prevent or reduce loneliness among older adults.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Loneliness refers to the subjective experience derived from the discrepancy between desired and actual social relationships [1], and differs from social isolation, the objective absence or lack of contacts and interactions between family, friends, and community [2]. Older adults are more likely to experience loneliness because of the loss of family and friends and a lack of relationships [3,4,5,6,7]. Greater loneliness in older adults is associated with poor mental health and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality [8,9,10,11]. Therefore, there is an increasing need for solutions to prevent or reduce loneliness among older adults.

Previous systematic reviews have reported that group-based psychological, technology-based, and exercise-based interventions were effective in reducing loneliness [12, 13]. Among the exercise-based interventions, walking is suitable for older adults because it is easy to incorporate into daily activities, regardless of age and sex and with a low risk of injury, and it does not require special equipment [14, 15]. A longitudinal study that investigated the association between walking and loneliness reported that older adults who spent more time walking per week showed lower levels of loneliness over three years [16]. Recent studies have focused on context of walking, such as the number of people walking together. Previous studies have reported that walking with someone has more positive effects on increasing physical activity (PA), motivation, and self-efficacy [17,18,19]. To date, it has been suggested that others’ presence is important to reduce loneliness [20], and walking with someone can affect psychosocial aspects [21]. Therefore, we hypothesized that walking with someone would be associated with a decrease in loneliness. Investigating the relationship between context of walking and loneliness may provide effective solutions to prevent or reduce loneliness among older adults. However, no study has yet investigated this association.

This study aimed to investigate the association between context of walking (non-walking, walking alone, and walking with someone) and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

Study design and participants

This cross-sectional study included community-dwelling older adults who were invited to participate in health check-ups. Participants were recruited with the cooperation of community associations and senior citizens’ associations in Suma-ku, Kobe, Japan. Specifically, flyers for the health check-up were distributed to the members of each association, or posted on the bulletin board of the community welfare centre. The health check-up was open to all older adults aged 65 years or older who were able to visit the health check-up site. A total of 173 Japanese community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older participated in the health check-up. Data were collected by trained physical therapists or physical therapy students at the health check-ups, conducted between September and October, 2021. During the health check-up, participants’ physical and cognitive functions were measured and questionnaires were completed. To ensure consistency of measurements, a personnel member in charge was assigned to each measurement. Exclusion criteria were missing data (n = 2). This study was approved by the ethics committee of Kobe University (authorization number 625-4), and all participants provided written informed consent.

Loneliness

Loneliness was assessed using the Japanese version of the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale [22, 23]. This scale comprises 20 questions, with a four-point scale ranging from “never” (score of 1) to “always” (score of 4). The total scores ranged from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater loneliness. The UCLA Loneliness Scale is a self-completion questionnaire that has been proven to be reliable (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92) among Japanese older adults [22].

Context of walking

First, participants were asked, ‘Excluding walking for work or transportation, generally, how many days in a week do you walk for at least 10 minutes at a time in your leisure time?’ This is included in the Japanese long version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [24]. Participants who walked once a week or more were then asked the following question: ‘How many days per week did you go for a walk with a partner, friend, or as part of a group?’ [18]. The context of walking was classified into one of three groups: non-walking (W0), walking alone (days of walking alone > days of walking with someone, W1), and walking with someone (days of walking alone ≤ days of walking with someone, W2) [25].

Other variables

Demographic data, including age, sex, years of education, body mass index (BMI; calculated as kg/m2), and living situation (living with someone or alone) were recorded. Social participation was defined as participation in at least one of the six types of group activities or associations at least once a week: senior citizens’ club, sports-related group, hobby-related group, volunteer or non-profit organization group, residents’ association, and religious groups [26]. Walking time per day was assessed using the Japanese long version of the IPAQ [24]. “PA excluding walking” was calculated as the total sum of the moderate and vigorous-intensity PA per week. Moderate and vigorous-intensity PA were calculated by multiplying the number of days per week, the total number of minutes per day, and metabolic equivalents (METs) corresponding to the intensity of each PA (moderate-intensity PA, four METs; vigorous-intensity PA, eight METs) [27].

Statistical analysis

To compare the differences between context of walking, we performed ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test, chi-squared (X2) test, and a Mann-Whitney U test. We used a post hoc Steel-Dwass test for variables that showed significant differences.

A linear regression model was used to investigate the association between context of walking and loneliness. The dependent variable was the UCLA loneliness score, and the independent variable was context of walking. Context of walking was defined as a categorical variable. The following variables were treated as confounding factors in the multivariate model: age, sex, living situation, social participation, and PA excluding walking. All confounding factors were selected based on previous studies [3, 28, 29]. Beta values (β), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and p-values were estimated for both models. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, and all statistical analyses were conducted using Jamovi software (version 2.2.2; The Jamovi Project, Sidney, Australia).

Results

Characteristics of participants

Table 1 presents the characteristics of participants in this study. A total of 171 older adults aged 65 years or older were included. The mean age ± standard deviation was 78.0 ± 5.6 years, and the percentage of women was 59.6% (n = 102). The percentage of older adults regarding context of walking (W0, W1, and W2) was 24.6% (n = 42), 60.2% (n = 103), and 15.2% (n = 26), respectively. There were no significant differences in the days of walking between W1 and W2 (mean days ± SD: W1, 4.6 ± 1.9; W2, 4.5 ± 2.1; p = 0.86) or walking time (mean time ± SD: W1, 65.2 ± 48.9; W2, 83.5 ± 58.6; p = 0.06). Participants in W2 have significantly lower loneliness, compared with those in W0 (W0, 38.2 ± 9.2; W1, 36.2 ± 9.9; W2, 31.9 ± 7.0; post hoc Steel-Dwass test, p = 0.02).

Table 1 Characteristics of participants
Full size table

Figure 1 shows the UCLA loneliness scores among the three groups, categorized by context of walking, indicating that the UCLA loneliness score decreases in the order of W0, W1, and W2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of UCLA loneliness score divided by context of walking. Data are presented as mean with 95% confidence interval. Context of walking was classified into three groups: non-walking (W0), walking alone (W1), and walking with someone (W2)

Full size image

Associations between context of walking and loneliness

Table 2 shows the results of the linear regression analysis of the associations between context of walking and UCLA loneliness score. In the univariate model, W2 was significantly associated with lower loneliness than W0 (β: -0.67, 95% CI: -1.16, -0.19, p < 0.01), but not with W1 (β: -0.21, 95% CI: -0.57, 0.14, p = 0.24). Even after adjustment, W2 was significantly associated with lower loneliness than W0 (β: -0.51, 95% CI: -1.00, -0.01, p = 0.04).

Table 2 Associations between Context of walking and UCLA loneliness score: Linear regression analysis
Full size table

Discussion

This cross-sectional study investigated the association between context of walking and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults. The results showed that loneliness was significantly lower when walking with someone, whereas there was no significant difference between walking alone and non-walking.

This is the first study to investigate the association between walking and loneliness, focusing on others’ presence.

Gyasi et al. [30] reported that older adults who engaged in more days of PA in a week had lower loneliness, suggesting that the association between PA and lower loneliness may be strengthened by social connectedness. This finding suggests that the association between PA and loneliness may depend on whether physical activity was conducted with someone or alone. However, they did not obtain information on the number of people engaged in PA. Therefore, we investigated the association between context of walking and loneliness and found that walking with someone was associated with lower loneliness. This study extends the findings of previous studies and suggests the importance of PA engaging with others to reduce loneliness.

Previous meta-analyses have reported that PA increases self-efficacy in older adults [31]. Greater self-efficacy is associated with lower loneliness [32]. The positive effect of PA on self-efficacy may reduce loneliness, as older adults with greater self-efficacy are more likely to have positive thoughts and undertake activities [33]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that self-efficacy may be enhanced when engaging in PA with someone [34].

Moreover, PA with someone provides more opportunities for social interaction, compared to PA alone [35]. These PAs seem to offer diverse relationship opportunities and facilitate a sense of belonging to community and group members [13]. The tripartite model of group identification, which is one of the loneliness reduction models, suggests that having a sense of identification and social attraction to group members with shared interests and goals during PA is effective in reducing loneliness [36]. Thus, the results may be explained by the positive effects of walking with someone on self-efficacy and social interaction.

Those who engage in more frequent PA with someone have more opportunities to benefit from the positive effect of self-efficacy and social interaction, compared with those who engage in more frequent PA alone. Previous studies concerning subjective health and mental health status have also reported the importance of increasing the frequency of exercise with someone [25, 37], and this study reported similar findings.

Walking with someone is easy to incorporate into daily life, even for older adults who are unfamiliar with exercise. This finding suggests that it is one of the effective solutions to prevent or reduce loneliness among older adults.

This study had some limitations. First, because it used a cross-sectional design, a longitudinal study is required to investigate the impact of walking with someone on loneliness. Second, the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was not considered in this study. Although there were no instructions to limit interactions or social activities with others, the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to increased loneliness due to reduced opportunities for face-to-face activities such as walking with someone. Third, this study did not ask participants whom they walked with (e.g., friends or family). Loneliness may be influenced by the closeness of the person walking, and this information needs to be obtained in future studies. Fourth, participants had lower mean UCLA loneliness scores compared to the mean UCLA loneliness score of 42.2 ± 9.9 among randomly selected older adults in a previous study [22]. This difference may be because the participants in this study were relatively healthy older adults recruited from community clubs who had more opportunities for daily contact with friends and neighbors. Therefore, caution must be exercised when generalizing these results. However, considering the impact of social interaction on daily living beyond walking, this study adjusted for social participation as a confounding factor. Fifth, PA was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Therefore, the assessment may not precisely reflect actual PA. Future studies should use objective indicators. Sixth, we were unable to adjust for other confounders that may influence loneliness. However, we have selected confounding factors that are particularly suggested to influence loneliness, based on previous studies [3, 28, 29].

In conclusion, this study investigated the association between context of walking and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults. The findings suggest that walking with someone is one of the effective solutions to prevent or reduce loneliness among older adults.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to contain information that could compromise the privacy of research participants but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PA:

physical activity

UCLA:

University of California, Los Angeles

BMI:

body mass index

METs:

metabolic equivalents

95% CI:

95% confidence intervals

References

  1. Perlman D, Peplau L. Toward a social psychology of loneliness personal relationships. Personal Relationships in Disorder. 1981;3:31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nicholson NR Jr. Social isolation in older adults: an evolutionary concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(6):1342–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dahlberg L, McKee KJ, Frank A, Naseer M. A systematic review of longitudinal risk factors for loneliness in older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2021;26(2):225–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dykstra PA, van Tilburg TG, Gierveld JDJ. Changes in older adult loneliness: results from a seven-year longitudinal study. Res Aging. 2005;27(6):725–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luanaigh C, Lawlor BA. Loneliness and the health of older people. Int J Geriatric Psychiatry: J Psychiatry Late Life Allied Sci. 2008;23(12):1213–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Surkalim DL, Luo M, Eres R, Gebel K, van Buskirk J, Bauman A, Ding D. The prevalence of loneliness across 113 countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022;376:e067068.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Victor CR, Bowling A. A longitudinal analysis of loneliness among older people in Great Britain. J Psychol. 2012;146(3):313–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a Meta-Analytic Review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(2):227–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holwerda TJ, Beekman AT, Deeg DJ, Stek ML, van Tilburg TG, Visser PJ, Schmand B, Jonker C, Schoevers RA. Increased risk of mortality associated with social isolation in older men: only when feeling lonely? Results from the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly (AMSTEL). Psychol Med. 2012;42(4):843–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leigh-Hunt N, Bagguley D, Bash K, Turner V, Turnbull S, Valtorta N, Caan W. An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness. Public Health. 2017;152:157–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rico-Uribe LA, Caballero FF, Martín-María N, Cabello M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Miret M. Association of loneliness with all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0190033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hagan R, Manktelow R, Taylor BJ, Mallett J. Reducing loneliness amongst older people: a systematic search and narrative review. Aging Ment Health. 2014;18(6):683–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pels F, Kleinert J. Loneliness and physical activity: a systematic review. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016;9(1):231–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hootman JM, Macera CA, Ainsworth BE, Addy CL, Martin M, Blair SN. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal injuries among sedentary and physically active adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(5):838–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee IM, Buchner DM. The importance of walking to Public Health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(7):512–S518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McMullan II, Bunting BP, Burns A, Smith L, Cunningham C, O’Sullivan R, Blackburn NB, Wilson JJ, Tully MA. Is physical activity Associated with loneliness or social isolation in older adults? Results of a longitudinal analysis using the irish longitudinal study on Ageing. J Aging Phys Act. 2021;29(4):562–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kassavou A, Turner A, French DP. Do interventions to promote walking in groups increase physical activity? A meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2013;10(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kritz M, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Mullan B, Stathi A, Ntoumanis N. It’s better together’: a nested longitudinal study examining the benefits of walking regularly with peers Versus primarily alone in older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2021;29(3):455–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meads C, Exley J. A systematic review of Group walking in physically healthy people to promote physical activity. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018;34(1):27–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodríguez-Romero R, Herranz‐Rodríguez C, Kostov B, Gené‐Badia J, Sisó‐Almirall A. Intervention to reduce perceived loneliness in community‐dwelling older people. Scand J Caring Sci. 2021;35(2):366–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eime RM, Young JA, Harvey JT, Charity MJ, Payne WR. A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2013;10(1):1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Masuda Y, Takeda E, Dai Y. Reliability and validity of the Japanese Version of the UCLA loneliness Scale Version 3 among the older Population. J Japan Acad Community Health Nurs. 2012;15(1):25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Russel DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996;66(1):20–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Murase N, Katsumura T, Ueda C, Inoue S, Shimomitsu T. Validity and reliability of japanese version of International Physical Activity Questionnaire. J Health Welf Stat. 2002;49(11):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kanamori S, Takamiya T, Inoue S, Kai Y, Kawachi I, Kondo K. Exercising alone versus with others and associations with subjective health status in older japanese: the JAGES Cohort Study. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chiao C, Weng LJ, Botticello AL. Social participation reduces depressive symptoms among older adults: an 18-year longitudinal analysis in Taiwan. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sjostrom M, Ainsworth B, Bauman A, Bull F, Hamilton-Craig C, Sallis J. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) – Short and Long Forms. 2005. http://www.ipaq.ki.se. Accessed 25 July 2021.

  28. 28, Anokye NK, Trueman P, Green C, Pavey TG, Taylor RS. Physical activity and health related quality of life. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen-Mansfield J, Hazan H, Lerman Y, Shalom V. Correlates and predictors of loneliness in older-adults: a review of quantitative results informed by qualitative insights. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;28(4):557–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gyasi RM, Phillips DR, Asante F, Boateng S. Physical activity and predictors of loneliness in community-dwelling older adults: the role of social connectedness. Geriatr Nurs. 2021;42(2):592–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Netz Y, Wu MJ, Becker BJ, Tenenbaum G. Physical activity and Psychological Well-Being in Advanced Age: a Meta-analysis of intervention studies. Psychol Aging. 2005;20(2):272–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nieboer AP, Hajema K, Cramm JM. Relationships of self-management abilities to loneliness among older people: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fry PS, Debats DL. Self-efficacy beliefs as predictors of loneliness and psychological distress in older adults. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2002;55(3):233–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McAuley E, Blissmer B, Katula J, Duncan TE. Exercise environment, self-efficacy, and affective responses to acute exercise in older adults. Psychol Health. 2002;15(3):341–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kanamori S, Takamiya T, Inoue S. Group exercise for adults and elderly: determinants of participation in group exercise and its associations with health outcome. J Phys Fit Sports Med. 2015;4(4):315–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shvedko A, Whittaker AC, Thompson JL, Greig CA. Physical activity interventions for treatment of social isolation, loneliness or low social support in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2018;34:128–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Takeda F, Noguchi H, Monma T, Tamiya N. How possibly do leisure and Social Activities Impact Mental Health of Middle-Aged adults in Japan?: an evidence from a National Longitudinal Survey. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0139777.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our participants for their time and willingness to respond to the questionnaires. We would also like to thank the staff for the distribution and collection of questionnaires and data entries.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Science, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hyogo, Japan

    Sachiko Mizuta, Kazuaki Uchida, Junya Nakamura, Haruhi Encho & Toshihiro Akisue

  2. Department of Prevention and Care Science, Research Institute, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan

    Kazuaki Uchida

  3. Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan

    Ryuichi Sawa

  4. Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan

    Junya Nakamura

  5. National Institute of Health and Nutrition, Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, KENTO Innovation Park NK Bldg., 3-17, Senriokashinmachi, Settu, Osaka, 566-0002, Japan

    Rei Ono

Authors
  1. Sachiko Mizuta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kazuaki Uchida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ryuichi Sawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Junya Nakamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Haruhi Encho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Toshihiro Akisue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rei Ono
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SM made substantial contributions to the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the results, and was involved in drafting the article. KU, RS, JN, and HE made substantial contributions to the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the results and were involved in critically revising it for important intellectual content. TA and RO made substantial contributions to the study concept and design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, and were involved in critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rei Ono.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Kobe University (authorization number 625-4). All methods were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants following a detailed description of the purpose, potential risks and benefits of the study. Participants were made aware that they could withdraw at any time.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mizuta, S., Uchida, K., Sawa, R. et al. Context of walking and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 23, 326 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04043-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04043-5

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us