Skip to main content

New balance capability index as a screening tool for mild cognitive impairment



Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is not just a prodrome to dementia, but a very important intervention point to prevent dementia caused by Alzheimer's disease (AD). It has long been known that people with AD have a higher frequency of falls with some gait instability. Recent evidence suggests that vestibular impairment is disproportionately prevalent among individuals with MCI and dementia due to AD. Therefore, we hypothesized that the measurement of balance capability is helpful to identify individuals with MCI.


First, we developed a useful method to evaluate balance capability as well as vestibular function using Nintendo Wii balance board as a stabilometer and foam rubber on it. Then, 49 healthy volunteers aged from 56 to 75 with no clinically apparent cognitive impairment were recruited and the association between their balance capability and cognitive function was examined. Cognitive functions were assessed by MoCA, MMSE, CDR, and TMT-A and -B tests.


The new balance capability indicator, termed visual dependency index of postural stability (VPS), was highly associated with cognitive impairment assessed by MoCA, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was more than 0.8, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity (app. 80% and 60%, respectively).


Early evidence suggests that VPS measured using Nintendo Wii balance board as a stabilometer helps identify individuals with MCI at an early and preclinical stage with high sensitivity, establishing a useful method to screen MCI.

Peer Review reports


Approximately 50 million people live with dementia worldwide, and this number is predicted to increase to 152 million by 2050 [1]. Total cost in 2019 for people with dementia was estimated to be $1.3 trillion globally, which could rise to $1.7 trillion by 2030 [2]. Thus, the burden of dementia continues to grow, and prevention strategies including early identification and early treatment of the disease are highly needed.

Although our understanding of dementia etiology is still shifting, Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia, accounting for an estimated 60% to 80% of cases [3]. The progression of AD is called the AD continuum. On this continuum, there are three broad phases: preclinical AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD and dementia due to AD [3]. A meta-analysis study found that among individuals with MCI who were tracked for 5 years or longer, 38% developed dementia [4]. However, in some individuals MCI reverts to normal cognition or remains stable, particularly with some appropriate intervention [1]. Therefore, it is important to identify individuals with MCI early in the course of AD in order to protect from dementia.

Generally, individuals with dementia are vulnerable for a decline in physical functioning and basic activities of daily living [5]. In fact, as a characteristic of cognitive impairment and dementia, it has long been known that people with AD have a higher frequency of falls [6, 7], and today, cognitive impairment is well established as an independent risk factor for falling [8, 9]. Moreover, emerging evidence indicates that early disturbances in cognitive function are associated with slower gait and gait instability [10, 11]. Given that gait and balance are deeply connected [12], some relationship between cognitive function and balance capability can be implicated.

The vestibular (inner ear balance) system senses head movement and orientation in space, and vestibular sensory input plays a critical role in postural control, contributing to balance capability which can be measured by static postural balance parameters during standing [13]. Intriguingly, growing evidence suggests that vestibular impairment is disproportionately prevalent among individuals with MCI and dementia due to AD [14, 15].

Posture in human is maintained using sensory inputs critical for balance, namely vestibular, visual, and somatosensory inputs [16]. Posturography is a technique used to quantify postural control in upright stance on a stabilometer. Recently, we and others have developed a useful method to evaluate balance capability as well as vestibular function using a stabilometer and foam rubber [13, 17,18,19]. With further modifications to this method, we hypothesized that we can distinguish between people with MCI and healthy people using a stabilometer. Here we report that a new balance capability indicator named visual dependency index of postural stability (VPS) is highly associated with cognitive impairment and helps screen individuals with MCI. Thus, VPS measurement using Wii balance board (WBB) can be an inexpensive MCI screening system.



From December 2020 to February 2021, we enrolled 49 participants with healthy conditions who were 56 to 75 years old and had no clinically apparent cognitive impairment. The participants were recruited using our department’s website, bulletin boards at our university, and a local community magazine. Participants were paid a reward of 7,000 yen. Exclusion criteria included (i) history of chronic diseases (dementia, diabetes, kidney disease, collagen disease, peripheral neuropathy); (ii) having a disability certificate or using long-term care insurance; (iii) being unable to walk independently without assistive devices (including transportation). No one was excluded based on results of cognitive function tests. Written informed consent was obtained from participants prior to study enrollment. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki as well as the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects in Japan and approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of University of Tsukuba Hospital (R02-251).

Clinical evaluation

Participants were surveyed for age, sex, exercise habitation, alcohol drinking habitation, working, driving. Body composition was evaluated by bioelectrical impedance analysis (InBody 720, BioSpace, Tokyo). Body mass index (BMI) and skeletal muscle mass index were calculated by dividing the body weight (kg) by the square of the height (m2) and dividing the limb skeletal muscle mass (kg) by the square of the height (m2), respectively.

Assessment of cognitive function

Global cognitive function was assessed using the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [20, 21] and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [22]. Based on MoCA, participants were categorized into two groups of normal (MoCA ≥ 26) and MCI (MoCA ≤ 25) [20]. Trail Making Test parts A and B (TMT-A/-B) were used for assessing processing speed and executive function, respectively [23]. Clinical dementia rating (CDR) were used as an observational scale to assess the severity of dementia [24,25,26]. These tests were selected because they are the most commonly used tests to diagnose MCI [27].

Assessment of balance capabilities

Balance capabilities were assessed by the index of postural stability (IPS) and the visual dependency index of postural stability (VPS). IPS and VPS were measured using a stabilometer as described previously [18]. As a stabilometer, GP-6000 gravicorder (Anima Co., Tokyo, Japan) and Wii balance board (WBB; Nintendo Co, Kyoto, Japan) were used. Briefly, IPS was measured as follows; first, the participants stood in a resting position with the inside of the foot at a distance of 10 cm on the stabilometer to measure the instantaneous fluctuations in the center of pressure (COP). Then, participants were instructed to incline the body to the front, rear, right and left keeping the body straight and without moving the feet for 10 s at each position, and the instantaneous fluctuations in COP were recorded. IPS was calculated as log [(area of stability limit + area of postural sway) / area of postural sway]. Area of stability limit was calculated as the front and rear center movement distance between anterior and posterior positions × the distance between right and left positions. Area of postural sway was calculated as average measurement value in 10 s under anterior, posterior, right, left and center positions. The area of postural sway was calculated as the mean sway area of the 5 positions [28]. Visual dependency index of postural stability (VPS) was defined as the ratio of eye-opened vs. eye-closed IPS values measured on foam rubber. VPS values are age-adjusted by the following formula: age-adjusted VPS = V / V’, where

V (measured VPS) = eye-opened IPS / eye-closed IPS, V’ (age-predicted VPS) = O / C, O (age-predicted eye-opened IPS) = -0.0003 × age2 + 0.0145 × age + 1.1602 (S1 Fig) and C (age-predicted eye-closed IPS) = -0.00006 × age2—0.0037 × age + 0.8805 (S2 Fig). That is, the age-adjusted VPS is calculated as the actual VPS divided by age-predicted VPS, and the age-predicted VPS is estimated based on the previous data collected from healthy individuals (n = 256) shown in S1 and S2 Figs.

For a measurement using WBB, WBB was connected wirelessly with a Bluetooth adapter to a laptop computer. Raw data were collected simultaneously, stored and processed using custom-written software (Penguin system Co, Ibaraki, Japan).

Statistical analyses

Based on distribution, continuous variables were expressed as deviation or median (interquartile range) and compared using the unpaired t-test or the Mann–Whitney test for two-group comparisons. We used t-test in case the normality distribution of the data was confirmed by the Shapiro–Wilk test and otherwise used the Mann–Whitney test. Categorical variables are expressed as numerals and percentages and were compared with Fisher’s exact test. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to examine bivariate associations between tests of cognitive function and balance capability. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to examine bivariate associations between IPS of the GP-6000 gravicorder and that of WBB. Regarding the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the VPS value and 01 classification (0 for Normal group, 1 for MCI group) for the presence or absence of MCI, the cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, and area under of the curve (AUC) for the presence or absence of MCI were calculated. The cutoff value was decided by the point where the Youdem Index reaches the maximum value. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 26 (Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was considered at a value of < 0.05.


Wii balance board (WBB) has the same performance as an authentic stabilometer

Because the final goal of our project is to implement an inexpensive MCI screening system to provide the best opportunity for interventions to prevent dementia, we started from developing a new posturographic system utilizing Wii balance board (WBB), a Nintendo game machine available at a very low cost (lower than $100). According to several previous reports where WBB was tested in a clinical setting to track and record the center of pressure (COP) of subjects [29,30,31], we developed a new software run on windows PC to measure and calculate index of postural stability (IPS) values (Fig. 1A) [17, 18]. As expected, WBB showed a good performance to measure IPS values as accurately as an authentic stabilometer for medical use (GP-6000 gravicorder), as shown in Fig. 1B.

Fig. 1
figure 1

WBB has the same performance as an authentic stabilometer. A Schematic representation of the IPS measurement system using WBB. B Correlation between IPS values measured by an authentic stabilometer (GP-6000 gravicorder) and those by WBB is shown (n = 49). IPS, index of postural stability; VPS, visual dependency index of postural stability; WBB, Wii balance board

VPS and cognitive function show a significant relationship

Next, we devised a new indicator of postural stability that is more associated with vestibular function, based on the previous reports: combination of IPS [17] and utilization of foam rubber as well as eye closure [13, 18, 32]. The resultant new indicator, named visual dependency index of postural stability (VPS), was defined as the ratio of eye-opened vs. eye-closed IPS values measured on foam rubber.

Using VPS, we examined the possible association between vestibular function and cognitive impairment. As a stabilometer, WBB was used with our original software. Table 1 showed the clinical characteristics of the study participants, basically healthy volunteers (n = 49). Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to assess cognitive function [20, 21]. It is widely accepted that MoCA is superior to MMSE in the detection of MCI as the MMSE has lower sensitivity [21, 33]. In fact, as shown in Table 2, both the normal and MCI groups diagnosed based on MoCA showed nearly full score (30 points) on MMSE. As shown in Fig. 2A, VPS values exhibited a significant negative correlation with MoCA scores (R = -0.511; p < 0.001). Also, significant positive association was observed between VPS and TMT-B scores (R = 0.375; p < 0.01), another scoring method to evaluate cognitive function (Fig. 2B, C).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of participants
Table 2 Comparison of cognitive function tests
Fig. 2
figure 2

VPS and cognitive function show a significant relationship. Correlation between test VPS and cognitive function is shown. Cognitive function is assessed by A MoCA, B TMT-A and C TMT-B. VPS, visual dependency index of postural stability; MoCA, Montreal cognitive assessment; TMT-A, trail making test part A; TMT-B, trail making test part B

MCI group has significantly higher VPS

In accordance with the above result, when participants were categorized into two groups of normal (MoCA ≥ 26) and MCI (MoCA ≤ 25), MCI group showed significantly higher VPS values (Fig. 3A; mean difference: -0.67, 95% confidence interval: -1.04 to -0.29 by t-test), despite no differences in IPS values between the groups (Fig. 3B; mean difference: 0.03, 95% confidence interval: -0.06 to 0.12 by t-test). All the other items were not significantly different between the two groups (Table 1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

MCI group has significantly higher VPS. Comparison of the normal group and the MCI group is shown. Data are analyzed by the unpaired t-test. *p < 0.01. Bars, standard errors. MCI, mild cognitive impairment; IPS, index of postural stability; VPS, visual dependency index of postural stability

ROC curve shows good sensitivity and specificity

The result of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was shown in Fig. 4. As shown there, area under of the curve (AUC) was more than 0.8, indicating a good sensitivity and specificity in general. The VPS cutoff value obtained from the maximum value of the Youden Index was 1.00 (sensitivity; 81.3%, specificity: 57.6%, 95% confidential interval: 0.675 – 0.936). In other words, if it exceeds the cutoff value of 1.00, it is highly likely that it is MCI, and conversely, if it is below it, it is highly likely that it is not MCI.

Fig. 4
figure 4

ROC curve shows good sensitivity and specificity. ROC curve of VPS is drawn to discriminate MCI from normal. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; VPS, visual dependency index of postural stability; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; AUC, area under the curve


In the present study, we suggested that our new balance indicator VPS is useful to screen individuals with MCI with high sensitivity.

The new indicator VPS (visual dependency index of postural stability) was created from the combination of IPS (index of postural stability) quantification method [17, 18] and foam posturography technique [13], both established previously. Among three sensory inputs critical for balance, namely vestibular, visual, and somatosensory inputs [16], the usage of foam rubber dampens the somatosensory input, and eye closure additionally eliminates visual input. Therefore, it is assumed that vestibular function can easily be assessed on foam rubber with eye-closed condition [13], and standing test with eyes closed on foam rubber has been well established as tests for clinical diagnosis of vestibular loss [34]. In fact, although we have not checked the point by ourselves, Fujimoto et al. examined the relationship between foam posturography data and direct vestibular function tests using cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs), a well-established clinical test to examine vestibular function, and concluded that foam posturography on an eye-closed condition was useful for assessing vestibular impairment with abnormal cVEMPs [32]. Further taking the ratio between eye-closed and -opened conditions, we managed to raise the accuracy of measurement and named the value VPS. Since VPS is measured under the condition of getting almost no somatosensory and visual inputs as described above, its value is basically considered to reflect vestibular function.

Regarding the relationship between vestibular dysfunction and cognitive impairment, emerging evidence suggests that vestibular loss is disproportionately prevalent among individuals with MCI and dementia due to AD compared to healthy people [14, 15, 35]; in a study named Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA), testing 183 healthy community-dwelling participants with a mean age of 72, they found that poorer vestibular function was significantly associated with poorer cognitive function assessed by several testing including TMT-B [14]. In addition, it has previously been shown that vestibular loss causes hippocampal atrophy and impaired spatial memory in humans [36]. A further study in BLSA found that poorer vestibular function was associated with significantly reduced hippocampal volume [37]. Thus, hippocampal atrophy may underlie the link between vestibular loss and cognitive decline.

As mentioned above, our method is based on the link between vestibular loss and cognitive decline. We think that this is the point of differentiation that creates extra value of our test in comparison to existing cognitive tests, because direct assessments of cognitive function can often present a psychological hurdle for subjects, which they would prefer to avoid if possible. In contrast, our method is not a direct assessment of cognitive function but just a balance ability test, so the psychological hurdle for subjects is much lower than direct methods.

Related to the link between vestibular and cognitive functions, hearing impairment is also reported to be linked with cognitive decline; in a small US prospective cohort study of 194 adults without baseline cognitive impairment and at least two brain MRIs with a mean of 19 years follow-up, it was reported that midlife hearing impairment measured by audiometry is associated with steeper temporal lobe volume loss, including in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex [38]. The positive association between the loss of inner ear function and cognitive impairment is noteworthy.

Considering further in this regard, inner ear dysfunction and hippocampal atrophy might have some underlying pathological processes shared in common. The hippocampus has been known as one of the limited areas in the adult mammalian brain where neurogenesis normally occurs [39], and it is widely acknowledged that hippocampal neurogenesis is impaired in AD, which plays a role in cognitive decline [40, 41]. On the other hand, recent evidence suggests that reactive adult neurogenesis occurs in sensory systems following damages to the sensory nerve, and in fact this mechanism promotes balance recovery after vestibular loss [42]. Thus, it is conceivable that some common disorder related to neurogenesis in AD might underlie the link between inner ear dysfunction and hippocampal atrophy. Although currently this is just a hypothesis and further investigation is needed to prove it, this hypothesis might be related to the fact that AD is also strongly associated with olfactory dysfunction [43,44,45,46], given that olfactory bulb is another area of the adult brain where neurogenesis occurs vigorously [39] and people with AD exhibit smaller olfactory bulb volumes [47].

MCI is not just a prodrome to dementia, but a very important intervention point to treat AD. Recently, aducanumab, an antibody drug targeting Aβ [48], was approved by FDA in the US [49]. This decision made aducanumab the first new drug to be approved for the treatment of AD since 2003 and the first drug to ever be approved for modification of the course of AD. Since the drug is targeting MCI and early AD, the demand for efficient screening of MCI will become larger in the near future.

Because we started this project to realize an inexpensive and easy-to-use MCI screening system, we focused on WBB, a very popular Nintendo game machine, and successfully showed that it can be used as a good stabilometer that has the same performance as an authentic apparatus approved for the medical use. Nintendo has so far sold out more than 37 million WBB worldwide ( It means a huge potential for the novel approach to diagnose MCI at an earlier stage.


We developed a new balance capability index termed VPS using WBB as a stabilometer. Early evidence suggests that this method is useful to screen individuals with MCI at an early and preclinical stage with high sensitivity.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.



Alzheimer's disease


Mild cognitive impairment


Visual dependency index of postural stability


Index of postural stability


Wii balance board


Montreal Cognitive Assessment


Mini-Mental State Examination


Trail Making Test parts A and B


Clinical dementia rating


  1. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;396(10248):413–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Health TLP. Reinvigorating the public health response to dementia. Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(10):e696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. (No author listed) 2020 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16:391–460.

  4. Mitchell AJ, Shiri-Feshki M. Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia–meta-analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009;119(4):252–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blankevoort CG, van Heuvelen MJ, Boersma F, Luning H, de Jong J, Scherder EJ. Review of effects of physical activity on strength, balance, mobility and ADL performance in elderly subjects with dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;30(5):392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morris JC, Rubin EH, Morris EJ, Mandel SA. Senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: an important risk factor for serious falls. J Gerontol. 1987;42(4):412–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchner DM, Larson EB. Falls and fractures in patients with Alzheimer-type dementia. JAMA. 1987;257(11):1492–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van Doorn C, Gruber-Baldini AL, Zimmerman S, et al. Dementia as a risk factor for falls and fall injuries among nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(9):1213–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Muir SW, Gopaul K, Montero Odasso MM. The role of cognitive impairment in fall risk among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2012;41(3):299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Montero-Odasso M, Verghese J, Beauchet O, Hausdorff JM. Gait and cognition: a complementary approach to understanding brain function and the risk of falling. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(11):2127–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bahureksa L, Najafi B, Saleh A, et al. The impact of mild cognitive impairment on gait and balance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using instrumented assessment. Gerontology. 2017;63(1):67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Visser H. Gait and balance in senile dementia of Alzheimer’s type. Age Ageing. 1983;12(4):296–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujimoto C, Murofushi T, Chihara Y, et al. Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of foam posturography for peripheral vestibular disorders: analysis of parameters related to visual and somatosensory dependence. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(7):1408–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bigelow RT, Semenov YR, Trevino C, et al. Association between visuospatial ability and vestibular function in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(9):1837–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Agrawal Y, Smith PF, Rosenberg PB. Vestibular impairment, cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease: balancing the evidence. Aging Ment Health. 2020;24(5):705–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Furman JM. Role of posturography in the management of vestibular patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;112(1):8–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mochizuki H, Mineshima T. Reliability and validity of the index of postural stability using forceplates. Rigaku Ryoho Gaku. 2000;27:199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Suzuki Y, Yatoh S, Suzuki H, et al. Age-dependent changes in dynamic standing-balance ability evaluated quantitatively using a stabilometer. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(1):86–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Midorikawa M, Suzuki H, Suzuki Y, et al. Relationships between cognitive function and odor identification, balance capability, and muscle strength in middle-aged persons with and without type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Res. 2021;2021:9961612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujiwara Y, Suzuki H, Yasunaga M, et al. Brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment in older Japanese: validation of the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010;10(3):225–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bowie CR, Harvey PD. Administration and interpretation of the trail making test. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2277–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140:566–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gelb DJ, St Laurent RT. Alternative calculation of the global clinical dementia rating. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1993;7(4):202–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43(11):2412–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stamatelos P, Economou A, Stefanis L, Yannis G, Papageorgiou SG. Driving and Alzheimer’s dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review of the existing guidelines emphasizing on the neurologist’s role. Neurol Sci. 2021;42(12):4953–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Suzuki Y, Suzuki H, Ishikawa T, et al. Exploratory analysis using machine learning of predictive factors for falls in type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11965.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Clark RA, Bryant AL, Pua Y, McCrory P, Bennell K, Hunt M. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. Gait Posture. 2010;31(3):307–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Park DS, Lee G. Validity and reliability of balance assessment software using the Nintendo Wii balance board: usability and validation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Leach JM, Mancini M, Peterka RJ, Hayes TL, Horak FB. Validating and calibrating the Nintendo Wii balance board to derive reliable center of pressure measures. Sensors (Basel). 2014;14(10):18244–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fujimoto C, Murofushi T, Chihara Y, et al. Effects of unilateral dysfunction of the inferior vestibular nerve system on postural stability. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121(8):1279–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Breton A, Casey D, Arnaoutoglou NA. Cognitive tests for the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the prodromal stage of dementia: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;34(2):233–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Petersen JA, Straumann D, Weber KP. Clinical diagnosis of bilateral vestibular loss: three simple bedside tests. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2013;6(1):41–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dobbels B, Peetermans O, Boon B, Mertens G, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V. Impact of bilateral vestibulopathy on spatial and nonspatial cognition: a systematic review. Ear Hear. 2019;40(4):757–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brandt T, Schautzer F, Hamilton DA, et al. Vestibular loss causes hippocampal atrophy and impaired spatial memory in humans. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 11):2732–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kamil RJ, Jacob A, Ratnanather JT, Resnick SM, Agrawal Y. Vestibular Function and Hippocampal Volume in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(6):765–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Armstrong NM, An Y, Doshi J, et al. Association of midlife hearing impairment with late-life temporal lobe volume loss. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(9):794–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Magavi SS, Leavitt BR, Macklis JD. Induction of neurogenesis in the neocortex of adult mice. Nature. 2000;405(6789):951–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rodriguez JJ, Jones VC, Tabuchi M, et al. Impaired adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of a triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(8):e2935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lazarov O, Hollands C. Hippocampal neurogenesis: learning to remember. Prog Neurobiol. 2016;138–140:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tighilet B, Chabbert C. Adult neurogenesis promotes balance recovery after vestibular loss. Prog Neurobiol. 2019;174:28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson RS, Arnold SE, Schneider JA, Tang Y, Bennett DA. The relationship between cerebral Alzheimer’s disease pathology and odour identification in old age. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(1):30–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wesson DW, Levy E, Nixon RA, Wilson DA. Olfactory dysfunction correlates with amyloid-beta burden in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. J Neurosci. 2010;30(2):505–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kotecha AM, Correa ADC, Fisher KM, Rushworth JV. Olfactory dysfunction as a global biomarker for sniffing out Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. Biosensors (Basel). 2018;8(2):41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jung HJ, Shin IS, Lee JE. Olfactory function in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(2):362–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jobin B, Boller B, Frasnelli J. Volumetry of olfactory structures in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Brain Sci. 2021;11(8):1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sevigny J, Chiao P, Bussiere T, et al. The antibody aducanumab reduces Abeta plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2016;537(7618):50–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Mullard A. FDA approval for Biogen’s aducanumab sparks Alzheimer disease firestorm. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(7):496.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank all the START project members at Headquarters for International Industry-University Collaboration, University of Tsukuba, for continuous support for the project. We also thank Ibaraki Occupational Therapist Association for helping to evaluate participants cognitive function. We also thank Dr. Yukio Yanagisawa at Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health and Welfare, Tokushima Bunri University, for giving us valuable advice.


This work was financially supported by Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) START (Program for Creating STart-ups from Advanced Research and Technology) University Ecosystem Promotion Type (University Promotion Type), Grant Number JPMJST2052, to N.Y.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Y.S. and N.Y. conceived the study. Y.S. T.T. and K.N. performed the study and analyzed the data together with N.Y. Y.S. and N.Y. co-wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoya Yahagi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by Research Ethics Committee at the University of Tsukuba Hospital (approval number: R02-251), and written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure S1.

Correlations of age with eye-opened IPS on foam rubber. Scatterplot showing dynamic balance values in healthy individuals (n = 256). Lines depict mean, 68th, and 95th percentiles. Based on these data, age-predicted eye-opened IPS is calculated by -0.0003 × age2 + 0.0145 × age + 1.1602. Supplementary Figure S2. Correlations of age with eye-closed IPS on foam rubber. Scatterplot showing dynamic balance values in healthy individuals (n = 256). Lines depict mean, 68th, and 95th percentiles. Based on these data, age-predicted eye-closed IPS is calculated by -0.00006 × age2 - 0.0037 × age + 0.8805.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suzuki, Y., Tsubaki, T., Nakaya, K. et al. New balance capability index as a screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatr 23, 74 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
  • Alzheimer's disease (AD)
  • Vestibular function
  • Balance
  • Stabilometer
  • Postural stability