Skip to main content
Download PDF

Screening efficacy of PhA and MNA-SF in different stages of sarcopenia in the older adults in community

BMC Geriatrics volume 23, Article number: 13 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To compare the screening ability of the phase Angle (PhA) and the Short-Form Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF) alone and combined detection in the different stages of sarcopenia among the older adults in the community.

Methods

The older adults aged 65 and above were enlisted during community outpatient service and their nutritional status was evaluated by MNA-SF scale. PhA was measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). AWGS2019 and EWGSOP2010 were used to define the different stages of sarcopenia. We measured skeletal mass index (SMI) and grip strength with BIA and electronic grip apparatus and measured body function with 6-m pace, SPPB test, and standing test.

Results

The AUC of PhA in the screening of possible sarcopenia was 0.640, the sensitivity was 58.49%, the specificity was 66.67%, and the cut-off value was 4.5. The AUC of the combined PhA and MNA-SF for possible sarcopenia was 0.642, the sensitivity was 57.55%, and the specificity was 70.00%. The AUC of MNA-SF for the screening of pre-sarcopenia was 0.805, the sensitivity was 66.67%, the specificity was 85.83%, and the cut-off value was 12. The AUC of the combined PhA and MNA-SF was 0.826, the sensitivity was 75.00%, and the specificity was 85.00%. The AUC of PhA in the screening of sarcopenia (common type) was 0.808, the sensitivity was 82.35%, the specificity was 73.33%, the cut-off value was 4.4. The AUC of the combined PhA and MNA-SF for sarcopenia (common type) was 0.835, the sensitivity was 76.47% and the specificity was 81.67%. The AUC of PhA and for the screening of severe sarcopenia was 0.935, the sensitivity was 93.33%, the specificity was 92.50%, and the cut-off value was 4.1. The AUC of the combined PhA and MNA-SF was 0.943, the sensitivity was 86.67%, and the specificity was 93.33%.

Conclusion

The screening ability of PhA alone or in combination was higher than that of MNA-SF in the screening of possible sarcopenia. The screening ability of the combined detection was higher than that of PhA alone in the screening of pre-sarcopenia. The combination of PhA and MNA-SF or PhA alone all performed better value in the screening of sarcopenia (common type). Compared to MNA-SF, the PhA performed better in the screening of severe sarcopenia, which provided references for identifying patients with different stages of sarcopenia in the community.

Peer Review reports

Sarcopenia is a disease which leads to the gradual decrease in skeletal muscle mass by 0.1 to 0.5% annually from the age of 30, and a drastic decrease after the age of 65 [1]. It is estimated that a decrease by about 8% every 10 years until the age of 70, and then decrease by 15% every 10 years [2]. The phase angle (PhA) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) scores mainly reflect the nutritional status of the older adults. When the PhA and the level of MNA-SF is low, the nutritional status of the body is also low. Insufficient protein and energy intake can also lead to the decrease of muscle mass, gradually developing into sarcopenia. The prevalence of sarcopenia in the older adults is 8.4% [3]. The incidence of sarcopenia among the older adults in the community aged 60 and above is 18.0% [4]. The prevalence of sarcopenia in 80-year-older in the United States is 7% in males and 11% in females [5]. Fractures and disabilities caused by sarcopenia seriously influence the quality of life of the older adults in their later years, and bring heavy burdens on individuals, families, and society. Studies have shown that inadequate intake of energy and nutrients is an important cause of sarcopenia. 13-week nutritional supplement intervention helps increase muscle mass and improves lower limb function in senile sarcopenia patients [6]. (PhA) [7] and (MNA-SF) [8] can be used to identify the malnourished older adults early in community, therefore, these two are widely applied in the screening of nutritional status. The PhA and MNA-SF applied in identifying the patients with sarcopenia in early stage have great public health significance in sarcopenia prevention. The AWGS2019 diagnostic consensus proposed the concept of “possible sarcopenia”, presenting as decrease muscle strength with or without physical function, and is specifically used in primary care or community health promotion to achieve early lifestyle interventions [9].

Phase angle (PhA) is a measurement value obtained from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and high phase angle is a sign of cell membrane integrity [10] and better cellular function [11]. At present, phase angle is applied in studies at home and abroad to assess the nutritional status of patients with diseases [12]. The study reported that the decreased phase angle has certain clinical significance for predicting sarcopenia [13]. Related studies abroad [14] and at home [15] analyzed the diagnostic value of phase angle for sarcopenia in the older adults. Therefore, the phase angle plays an important role in the diagnosis of sarcopenia. As a simple and inexpensive method for evaluating the nutritional status of the older adults, MNA-SF has been widely used in the screening of malnutrition [16] and its prediction in the older adults [17] and it is also adopted to evaluate the nutritional status of patients with sarcopenia [18]. It has been reported that the MNA-SF score decreases gradually with the severity of sarcopenia [19]. Some studies have used MNA-SF test to assess the risk of malnutrition in the hospitalized patients and found that it has a good predictive effect on low muscle-mass index [20].

Although studies have found the role of the phase angle (PhA) and MNA-SF in the diagnosis of sarcopenia, the sarcopenia often goes through the stages of possible sarcopenia, the pre-sarcopenia, the sarcopenia (common type), and severe sarcopenia. Patients in different stages of sarcopenia have different symptoms, and the prevention and treatment measures also vary. Therefore, intervention can be taken after identifying the stage of sarcopenia in the early period, which is of great public health significance in controlling and preventing sarcopenia. So, screening patients with sarcopenia at different stages among the older adults in the community is of great significance. There is no study comparing the efficacy of the MNA-SF and PhA in identifying patients at different stages of sarcopenia, and the efficacy of the combination of MNA-SF and PhA has not been reported yet. Therefore, this study attempted to identify patients at different stages of sarcopenia in the outpatient department of community hospital in accordance with AWGS2019 and EWGSOP 2010 [21]. In addition, receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve is adopted to figure out the screening ability of PhA and MNA-SF in different stages of sarcopenia, so as to provide reference for the early intervention of sarcopenia.

Methods

Study design

This is a cross-sectional study.

Participants

The selection of participants

A total of 270 older adults who visited the outpatient department of Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center in Beijing from October 2021 to December 2021 were enlisted. This study passed the ethical review of Capital Medical University Ethics Committee (Z2021SY014), and all subjects signed informed consent forms.

The inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria are as follows: ①Age 65 ~ 85 years old; ②Should be able to communicate③Cooperate with data collection and sign informed consent. The exclusion criteria are as follows: ①Older adults with cognitive (language, sensory perception, etc.) dysfunction or at the onset of mental illness ②Older adults with cardiac pacemaker implantation or joint replacement ③Older adults severe heart, liver, kidney and other important organ dysfunction.

Diagnostic criteria for different stages of sarcopenia

Sarcopenia, severe sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia were diagnosed in accordance with the diagnostic criteria published by the Asian Sarcopenia Working Group (AWGS) in 2019. Pre-sarcopenia was diagnosed by the 2010 European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP), thus, as having only lowered muscle mass, reported as Skeletal muscle mass (SMI). ①The cut-off values for having lowered skeletal mass index (SMI) for a measurement with BIA are: male< 7.0 kg/m2, female< 5.7 kg/m2②Physical function assessment: 6 m gait speed < 1.0 m/s or SPPB score ≤ 9 or standing test ≥12 s③Grip strength: male< 28 kg, female< 18 kg If①and ② or ③are satisfied, sarcopenia (common type) can be diagnosed. If ①and② and ③are satisfied, severe sarcopenia can be diagnosed. Possible sarcopenia is diagnosed as having a decreased hand grip strength or having decreased 6-m gait speed time (Table 1). The control group was defined as older adults without severe sarcopenia, sarcopenia, possible sarcopenia, or pre-sarcopenia.

Table 1 The classification of sub-types of sarcopenia
Full size table

Questionnaire survey

A questionnaire was used to collect the basic information of all participants. The nutritional status of the subjects was assessed with the MNA-SF scale, and the functional health status was assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). All the questionnaires were completed face-to-face to the subjects.

Height and weight measurements

The height and weight were measured using a stadiometer (BLT-1B0a). During the measurement, the subjects were asked to wear light clothing, removed their shoes and hats, and keep their torso straight. The instrument displays height and weight automatically.

Grip strength test [22]

Electronic grip force measurement (model WCS-100) produced by Shanggai Xinman Technology Education Equipment Co, LTD was applied. WCS-100 Electronic Grip Strength Tester, also known as Dynamograph, is a new generation of physical measuring instruments. Equipped with pressure difference sensor and micro-computer technology, WCS-100 Electronic Grip Strength Tester (or Dynamograph) provides stable and reliable data display clearly. It can be powered by AC or laminated battery cell of 9 V. The specific method used is as follows, the subjects were asked to stand with elbow straighten at an angle of 90 degrees. They were then asked to bend the elbow and grasp the handle hard. The new measurement peak was displayed in the screen after that. If the subject was unable to stand, the test could also be performed in a sitting position. Grip strength was measured twice by the dominant hand, and the average value was used to evaluate the grip strength [23].

6 m gait speed test

A straight-line distance of 9 m was selected on the open and flat ground with marks on the point of 0, 4 and 6 m. The subjects moved forward at normal walking speed after hearing the order from the tester. The tester recorded the time when a foot touches the 0 m mark and passed the 6 m mark respectively.

Body composition detection (Inbody770)

A comprehensive analysis of the human body can be performed using the Inbody770 from Bass Medical Equipment Trading company (Shanghai). The specific measurement methods are as follows: Subjects were required to fast, refrain from water, and avoid strenuous exercise for 2 h before the test. During the test, subjects should keep quiet, wear light clothes and avoid carrying metal products. Then the subjects were asked to take off their shoes and hats, keeping their torso naturally straight with hands hanging down at a 15-degree angle to the torso. Holding the electrode handle with both hands and standing on the feet electrode of the base. They were asked to press the thumb on the electrode gently following the voice prompts.

SPPB test [24]

Methods used were hierarchical assessment of standing balance, 4-m walking speed at usual pace, and standing up for five times from a seated position in a chair. The timed results of each sub-test were rescaled according to predefined cut-points for obtaining a score ranging from 0 (worst performance) to 4 (best performance). The total score of SPPB ranges from 0 to 12. For standing balance, participants were asked to remain standing with their feet as close together as possible, then in a semi-tandem position, and finally in a tandem position. Each position had to be held for 10 s. We considered the presence of balance deficit as the inability to maintain tandem position for at least 10 s.

Statistical analysis

All the survey data were recorded by Epidata3.1, and the database was confirmed after verifying the data. SPSS 25.0 was used for statistical analysis of the survey data. Continuous variables were summarized as means ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range (IQR), and categorical variables were summarized as counts and percentages. Characteristics of participants and their PhA and MNA-SF score were compared using the chi square test, Fisher’s exact test, and Kruskal-Wallis test, where appropriate. Spearman was used to analyze the correlation between variables, with the results as follows: < 0.15 very weak, 0.15–0.25 weak, 0.25–0.4 moderate, 0.4–0.75 strong, > 0.75 very strong [25]. In multivariate analysis, binary Logistic regression model was adopted to analyze the relationship between variables, and the “Enter” method was adopted to introduce independent variables. The ROC curve was applied to assess the screening ability of the PhA and MNA-SF for sarcopenia. Screening ability of the PhA and MNA-SF in identifying different stages of sarcopenia were analyzed. In the combined detection, the screening results of the PhA and MNA-SF were used as independent variables, and the clinically confirmed diagnosis was taken as dependent variables to conduct Logistic regression. The predicted probability of Logistic regression was used to draw the ROC curve. Receiver operating characteristic curve ROC was drawn by MedCalc20.0. The sensitivity and specificity were combined to find the best cut-off value, and the ROC area between groups was compared by Z test. Test level α = 0.05.

Results

Participant characteristics

A total of 270 subjects were included in this study, including 120 patients without severe sarcopenia, sarcopenia (common type), possible sarcopenia, or pre-sarcopenia, 106 patients with possible sarcopenia, 12 patients with pre-sarcopenia, 17 patients with sarcopenia (common type), 15 patients with severe sarcopenia, 92 males and 178 females (Table 2).

Table 2 Characteristics of study population
Full size table

Comparison of PhA and MNA-SF in different sarcopenia stages

The PhA and MNA-SF scores were different in different sarcopenia stages(P < 0.001). With the severity of sarcopenia, the PhA and MNA-SF score was lower (Table 3).

Table 3 PhA and MNA-SF comparison of different sarcopenia stages
Full size table

Correlation analysis of PhA and MNA-SF with sarcopenia components

The MNA-SF score was moderately positively correlated with SMI (r = 0.399, P < 0.05). PhA was strongly positively correlated with SMI and grip strength, and moderately positive correlated with walking speed and SPPB score (r = 0.539, 0.507, 0.289, 0.333, P < 0.01) (Table 4).

Table 4 Spearman correlation analysis between PhA, MNA-SF with sarcopenia components
Full size table

The screening ability analysis of PhA and MNA-SF in screening of possible sarcopenia

The area under the ROC curve of PhA was 0.640, which was higher than that of MNA-SF at 0.505 (Z = 2.804, P = 0.005). No difference was found between the combined detection value with PhA alone. The ROC area of combined detection of PhA and MNA-SF was higher than that of MNA-SF (Z = 2.785, P = 0.005). The screening specificity of MNA-SF was higher than PhA and combined detection of PhA and MNA-SF for possible sarcopenia and the difference was statistically significant (Table 5 and Fig. 1).

Table 5 The screening ability analysis of PhA and MNA-SF single or combined detection for possible sarcopenia
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

The area under the ROC curve of PhA and MNA-SF single or combined detection for the screening of possible sarcopenia. Note: A is the ROC curve for the screening of possible sarcopenia by PhA, B is the ROC curve for the screening of possible sarcopenia by MNA-SF, C is the ROC curve for combined detection for screening of possible sarcopenia, D is the ROC curve for the screening of possible sarcopenia by PhA, MNA-SF and the combined detection

Full size image

The screening ability analysis of PhA and MNA-SF in screening of pre-sarcopenia

Compared with PhA, MNA-SF was valuable in the screening of pre-sarcopenia (AUC was 0.805, P < 0.05). The ROC area of combined detection of PhA and MNA-SF was higher than that of the single detection of PhA in pre-sarcopenia (Z = 2.454, P = 0.014). The screening specificity of MNA-SF in the detection of pre-sarcopenia was higher than that of the PhA, the difference was statistically significant. The screening specificity of combined detection of PhA and MNA-SF for pre-sarcopenia was higher than that of the single detection of PhA, the difference was statistically significant (Table 6 and Fig. 2).

Table 6 The screening ability analysis of PhA and MNA-SF single or combined detection for pre-sarcopenia
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

The area under the ROC curve of PhA and MNA-SF single or combined detection for the screening of pre-sarcopenia. Note: A is the ROC curve for the screening of pre-sarcopenia by PhA, B is the ROC curve for the screening of pre-sarcopenia by MNA-SF, C is the ROC curve for combined detection for screening of pre-sarcopenia，D is the ROC curve for the screening of pre-sarcopenia by PhA, MNA-SF and the combined detection

Full size image

The screening ability analysis of PhA and MNA-SF in screening of sarcopenia (common type)

The PhA and MNA-SF all had the screening ability in the sarcopenia (common type) and the area under the ROC curve was 0.808 and 0.720. The ROC area of combined detection was higher than the MNA-SF (Z = 2.055, P = 0.039). The screening specificity of combined detection of PhA and MNA-SF for sarcopenia (common type) was higher than that of the single detection of MNA-SF (Table 7 and Fig. 3).

Table 7 The screening ability analysis of PhA and MNA-SF single or combined detection for sarcopenia (common type)
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

The area under the ROC curve of PhA and MNA-SF single or combined detection for the screening of sarcopenia (common type). Note: A is the ROC curve for the screening of sarcopenia (common type) by PhA, B is the ROC curve for the screening of sarcopenia (common type) by MNA-SF, C is the ROC curve for combined detection for diagnosis of sarcopenia (common type)，D is the ROC curve for the diagnostic of sarcopenia (common type) by PhA, MNA-SF and the combined detection

Full size image

The screening ability analysis of PhA and MNA-SF in screening of severe sarcopenia

The area under the ROC curve of PhA was higher than of MNA-SF (Z = 2.318, P = 0.020). The ROC area of combined detection was higher than the MNA-SF(Z = 2.730, P = 0.006). The screening specificity of combined detection of PhA and MNA-SF for severe sarcopenia was higher than that of the single detection of MNA-SF, and the screening specificity of PhA was higher than that of MNA-SF (Table 8 and Fig. 4).

Table 8 The screening ability analysis of PhA and MNA-SF single or combined detection for severe sarcopenia
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

The area under the ROC curve of PhA and MNA-SF single or combined detection for the screening of severe sarcopenia. Note: A is the ROC curve for the screening of severe sarcopenia by PhA, B is the ROC curve for the screening of severe sarcopenia by MNA-SF, C is the ROC curve for combined detection for diagnosis of severe sarcopenia，D is the ROC curve for the diagnostic of severe sarcopenia by PhA, MNA-SF and the combined detection

Full size image

Discussion

Sarcopenia is a common disease among the older adults. As the world’s population is ageing, there will be higher prevalence of sarcopenia in older adults. In this study, it was discovered that the severity of sarcopenia aggravates as people get older. The PhA and MNA-SF scores were different in different stages of sarcopenia. PhA and MNA-SF were positively correlated with skeletal muscle mass index, grip strength, walking speed, SPPB scores, and body function. Both PhA and MNA-SF could effectively identify sarcopenia among the older adults in the community. The screening accuracy of PhA was higher than that of MNA-SF. At present, there is no study comparing the value of MNA-SF and PhA in identifying different sarcopenia stages, such as pre-sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia. By analyzing different stages of sarcopenia, it was found that the PhA has the value of screening possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia (common type), while MNA-SF has a great screening value in pre-sarcopenia. The PhA and MNA-SF both played a role in the screening of severe sarcopenia. This provided reference for the timely screening of patients with sarcopenia in different stages in the community.

The PhA is directly related to the volume of intracellular fluid and is closely related to muscle tissue, which may explain that individuals with higher muscle mass may also have higher PhA [26]. Phase angle is also significantly correlated with grip strength and other motion indexes. High phase angle is significantly positively correlated with grip strength, knee extension force, and high activity level of masters [27]. Similar to the results obtained in this study, the reason behind is mainly muscle mass and decrease in muscle strength of people with low phase angle, which further leads to the decrease of body function performance [28]. Although the possible sarcopenia patients have not yet developed to the sarcopenia, the reduce grip strength and body function can also cause decreased exercise ability among the older adults, affecting the quality of life. This study showed that the PhA had certain significance in the screening of possible sarcopenia, but the screening ability was not high, which was mainly due to the fact that the possible sarcopenia patients only experience a decrease in grip strength and body function without a loss of skeletal muscle mass. It indicated that the nutritional status of the possible sarcopenia has not yet changed significantly, and the decline function may be related to fewer physical activities. Health education for the patients with possible sarcopenia should be prioritized in the community work, so as to prevent them from developing sarcopenia. The diagnostic criteria of possible sarcopenia according to AWGS2019, included grip strength or/and walking speed. While grip strength was only one of the indicators reflecting muscle strength, it was reported that back muscle strength was also an important indicator of muscle strength [29]. In the present study, only grip strength was detected, which does not fully reflect the muscle strength level of the older adults. It was necessary to comprehensively consider various factors and indicators that affect muscle strength in the future study.

Mainly charactered by decreased muscle mass, pre-sarcopenia may be related to insufficient protein synthesis caused by the poor nutritional status of patients. As the largest protein pool in human body, skeletal muscle accounts for about 60% of the total protein and 20% of the protein weight of muscle. With the increasing age, protein synthesis reaction decreases, resulting in the decline of muscle mass [30]. As a tool for screening nutritional status of the older adults, MNA-SF delivered the same results of malnutrition with that obtained according to the laboratory standards. Therefore, malnutrition in patients with chronic diseases can be better identified [31]. In addition, MNA-SF also has good application value due to its role in reducing the rate of missed diagnosis while screening protein energy consumption [32]. This study also found that MNA-SF scores was mainly positively correlated with SMI, and that MNA-SF had a high value in the screening of pre-sarcopenia. This finding could provide a certain reference for the community to carry out large-scale screening of pre-sarcopenia. In the screening of pre-sarcopenia, it was found that the screening ability of PhA combined with MNA-SF was higher than that of PhA alone, with a sensitivity of 75.00%, indicating that the combination of PhA and MNA-SF could identify 75.00% of the patients with pre-sarcopenia, while 25.00% of them might be negative (a false negative rate of 25.00%). Furthermore, PhA combined with MNA-SF could also identify 85.00% (specificity) of the patients without pre-sarcopenia and 15.00% (a false positive rate) of older adults were classified as pre-sarcopenic patients. This study aimed to identify patients with pre-sarcopenia as early as possible to take measures. Therefore, PhA combined with MNA-SF was preferred in screening the patients with pre-sarcopenia.

The PhA and MNA-SF indicated that nutritional status was closely related to sarcopenia components. In this study, it was found that the PhA was positively correlated with SMI, grip strength, 6 m gait speed, and SPPB scores, indicating that the change of phase angle could lead to changes in skeletal muscle mass, strength, and function. The PhA reflects the quantity and quality of soft tissue, nutritional status, and body function. When the nutrient intake is insufficient or protein deficiency is caused, the phase angle will be reduced. Our results also indicated that the PhA had a good application value in the screening of sarcopenia in the community, which is consistent with the results of Chen Xinyu et al. [13]. The MNA-SF scale is widely used in the survey of nutritional status of patients with various chronic diseases because it is inexpensive and easy to use. Tan VMH et al. [33] found that MNA-SF can identify micronutrient deficiency caused by unbalanced diet, which further lead to decreased muscle mass and strength [34]. It is also found in this research that the lower MNA-SF scores indicated malnutrition, which leads to the decline in muscle mass and strength and gradually develops into sarcopenia. Therefore, the PhA and MNA-SF both played a role in the screening of older adults with sarcopenia in the community.

Without timely treatment for the sarcopenia (common type), patients will suffer severe sarcopenia, which is mainly manifested by the simultaneous reduction in muscle mass, muscle strength and body function. Our study also found that patients with severe sarcopenia had lower PhA and MNA-SF scores than those in other stages, indicating a continuous decline in nutritional status. Both PhA and MNA-SF can effectively identify severe sarcopenia. Therefore, patients with severe sarcopenia should be should be provided with nutritional and medical treatment to alleviate the disease.

There were several limitations in our study. Firstly, the number of patients with pre-sarcopenia and sarcopenia (common type) and severe sarcopenia is small, so the sample size should be expanded for future study. Secondly, as a single-center, cross-sectional study, the results obtained only reflect the situation at the certain time and cannot determine the chronological sequence between malnutrition and sarcopenia. Thirdly, it is known that BIA is a technique for tests by introducing alternating current signals into the human body. The results of a test are susceptible to the unevenly distributed current and the different postures during the test. The subjects included in this study are older adults who cannot maintain a fixed posture for a while during the test. In addition, the results are also affected by the hydration status of the body. As a questionnaire, MNA-SF mainly asks subjects about their situation in the past month, which is highly influenced by the subjective feelings and recall bias of the older adults, and thus the results might also be affected [35]. Fourthly, Hormones, protein supplements, and vitamin D were not significantly different among the groups at baseline, but other medications which may affect muscle mass were not fully included. In addition, we found differences in age, sex, and comorbidities among the groups at baseline, which were the potential influencing factors.

In conclusion, PhA and MNA-SF were correlated with community sarcopenia and its components, and both the PhA and MNA-SF showed a certain value in the screening of sarcopenia in different stages. Moreover, the cutoff value for possible sarcopenia and pre-sarcopenia was put forward. The screening ability of PhA alone or in combination was higher than that of MNA-SF in the screening of possible sarcopenia. The combination of PhA and MNA-SF performed better than the PhA or MNA-SF alone in the screening of pre-sarcopenia. The combination of PhA and MNA-SF or PhA alone all performed better value in the screening of sarcopenia (common type). Compared to MNA-SF, the PhA performed better in the screening of severe sarcopenia. BIA and MNA-SF are two indicators adopted in this paper to identify patients with sarcopenia in different stages. As a quantitative evaluation method, BIA was cheap and portable, which was more easily accepted by the older adults. MNA-SF was a questionnaire with six questions, which required less time to conduct surveys among the older adults. Both of the two methods were highly practical in the community. The test of the PhA and MNA-SF can help community workers identify the stage of sarcopenia and provide scientific prevention and control measures, which have important public health significance. As the results mentioned above are obtained from our research on the older adults in the community of China, the relevant researches targeting different groups in other countries or regions are needed to verify the results.

Availability of data and materials

Data will be available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Liguori I, Russo G, Aran L, et al. Sarcopenia: assessment of disease burden and strategies to improve outcome. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:913–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim TN, Choi KM. Sarcopenia: definition, epidemiology, and pathophysiology. J Bone Metab. 2013;20(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tian XL, Yang L, Shen J, et al. Prevalence and influencing factors of sarcopenia in middle-aged and elderly people in Midong district of Urumqi city. Chin J Osteoporosis Bone Mineral Res. 2020;13(1):21–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shi M, Zhang NN, Wang Q, et al. Occurrence and influencing factors of sarcopenia in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Chin J Gerontol. 2021;41(19):4182–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgartner RN, Waters LW. Sarcopenia and sarcopenic-obesity. In: Pathy MS, Sinclair AJ, Morley JE, editors. Principles and practice of geriatric medicine. Chichester: Wiley; 2006. p. 909–33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bauer JM, Verlaan S, Bautmans I, et al. Effects of a vitamin D and leucine-enriched whey protein nutritional supplement on measures of sarcopenia in older adults, the PROVIDE study: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(9):740–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirose S, Nakajima T, Nozawa N, et al. Phase angle as an Indicator of sarcopenia, malnutrition, and Cachexia in inpatients with cardiovascular diseases. J Clin Med. 2020;9(8):2554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Faxén-Irving G, Luiking Y, Grönstedt H, et al. Do malnutrition, sarcopenia and frailty overlap in nursing-home residents? J Frailty Aging. 2021;10(1):17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen L-K, Woo J, Assantachai P, et al. Asian working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(3):300–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Basile C, Della-Morte D, Cacciatore F, et al. Phase angle as bioelectrical marker to identify elderly patients at risk of sarcopenia. Exp Gerontol. 2014;58:43–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lukaski HC, Kyle UG, Kondrup J. Assessment of adult malnutrition and prognosis with bioelectrical impedance analysis: phase angle and impedance ratio. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017;20(5):330–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao H j, Zhang M, Qi Y m, et al. Association of phase angle and nutritional status,clinical outcomes in liver cirrhosis patients. Parenteral Enteral Nutr. 2019;26(3):145–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen X y, Zhou J l, Li T t, et al. Association of phase angle with sarcopenia in elderly adults. Parenteral Enteral Nutr. 2021;28(5):275–80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosas-Carrasco O, Ruiz-Valenzuela RE, López-Teros MT. Phase angle cut-off points and their association with sarcopenia and frailty in adults of 50-64 years old and older adults in Mexico City. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:617126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Geng J, Wei Y, Wang J, et al. Correlation analysis between phase angle and sarcopenia in elderly hospitalized patients with chronic diseases. Chin J Osteoporos. 2022;28(4):499–504.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou H, Wu W, Xue L, et al. The risk evaluation of mini nutritional assessment sheet for the malnutrition risk in elderly inpatients with cardiovascular diseases. Hebei Med J. 2021;43(08):1183–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Han S, Zhao J, Ye J, et al. Value of nutritional risk screening 2002 and Mini nutritional assessment-short form in predicting the survival time of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice after surgery. J Clin Hepatol. 2019;35(8):1755–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu F, Liu H, Liu X, et al. Nutritional status mediates the relationship between sarcopenia and cognitive impairment: findings from the WCHAT study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33(12):3215–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cao W, Zhu A, Chu S, et al. Correlation between nutrition, oral health, and different sarcopenia groups among elderly outpatients of community hospitals: a cross-sectional study of 1505 participants in China. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yürüyen M, Yavuzer H, Yavuzer S, et al. Comparison of nutritional risk screening tools for predicting sarcopenia in hospitalized patients[J]. Turk J Med Sci. 2017;47:1362–9.

  21. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European working group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing. 2010;39(4):412–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao Y-y, Yang X-h, Gu J, et al. Associations between muscle strength and fatigue and physical activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in remission. Pract Clin Med. 2019;20(5):78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang X s, Liu Y h, Zhang Y, et al. Application value of handgrip strength in nutrition assessment of elderly medical inpatients. Acad J Chin PLA Med Sch. 2015;8:818–21.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49(2):M85–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pasnoor M, Heim AJ, Herbelin L, et al. Methotrexate in MG investigators of the muscle group study. Methotrexate poly glutamation in a myasthenia gravis clinical trial. Kans. J Med. 2020;13(Suppl 2):10–3.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Matias CN, Campa F, Nunes CL, et al. Phase angle is a marker of muscle quantity and strength in overweight/obese former athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(12):6649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Norman K, Stobaus N, Pirlich M, et al. Bioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis: clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parameters. Clin Nutr. 2012;31(6):854–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tomeleri CM, Cavalcante EF, Antunes M, et al. Phase angle is moderately associated with muscle quality and functional capacity, independent of age and body composition in older women. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019;42(4):281–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen J, Feng W, Hou X, et al. Effect of kettlebell training on elderly women with sarcopenia. Int Med Health Guidance News. 2022;28(2):180–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cai J, Lou H, et al. Sarcopenia. Electron J Metab Nutr Cancer. 2019;06(1):135–43.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chen X. In: Jiang S, editor. Discussion of methods for evaluating nutritional status in patients with inflammatory bowel disease[D]. JIANG SU: Soochow University; 2015. https://kns-cnki-net-443.webvpn.ccmu.edu.cn/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201601&filename=1016020178.nh.

  32. Xu F, Song X, et al. Comparison of evaluation of dialysis - related protein - energy wasting evaluated by three nutritional screening tools in patients with maintenance hemodialysis. Nurs Pract Res. 2020;17(20):8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tan VMH, Pang BWJ, Lau LK, et al. Malnutrition and sarcopenia in community-dwelling adults in Singapore: Yishun health study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(3):374–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mithal A, Bonjour JP, Boonen S, Burckhardt P, Degens H, El Hajj FG, et al. Impact of nutrition on muscle mass, strength, and performance in older adults. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(5):1555–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lyons-Reid J, Ward LC, Kenealy T, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-an easy tool for quantifying body composition in infancy? Nutrients. 2020;12(4):920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Professor Shugang Li for his guidance in this study and thank our research team for their selfless help.

Funding

This work was supported by Leading talents of the first batch of high-level public health Technical Talents Construction Project of Beijing Health System (No. 2022–1-005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Child, Adolescent Health and Maternal Care, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, No.10 YOU’anmenwai Xitoutiao, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China

    Xiaoli Zhu, Xinying Dong & Shugang Li

  2. Fangzhuang Community Health Center, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100078, China

    Li Wang & Xueting Lao

  3. School of general practice and continuing education, Capital Medical University, No.10 YOU’anmenwai Xitoutiao, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China

    Hao Wu

Authors
  1. Xiaoli Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xinying Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xueting Lao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shugang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hao Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZXL, DXY, WL, LXT, LSG and WH were involved in the conception and design of the study. ZXL was responsible for writing the article and DXY, WL, LXT, LSG and WH were responsible for revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shugang Li or Hao Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study passed the ethical review of Capital Medical University Ethics Committee (Z2021SY014), and all subjects signed informed consent forms. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, X., Dong, X., Wang, L. et al. Screening efficacy of PhA and MNA-SF in different stages of sarcopenia in the older adults in community. BMC Geriatr 23, 13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03716-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03716-x

Keywords

  • Community
  • The older adults
  • Sarcopenia
  • The phase angle
  • MNA-SF

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us