Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effects of family multi-generational relationship on multimorbidity and healthy life expectancy for second generations: insight from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study

BMC Geriatrics volume 23, Article number: 100 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

In the context of aging, Chinese families consisting of more than three generations (grandparents, parents, children) are the norm. The second generation (parents) and other family members may establish a downward (contact only with children) or two-way multi-generational relationship (contact with children and grandparents). These multi-generational relationships may have the potential effect on multimorbidity burden and healthy life expectancy in the second generation, but less is known about the direction and intensity of this effect. This study aims to explore this potential effect.

Methods

We obtained longitudinal data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study from 2011 to 2018, which included 6,768 people. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association between multi-generational relationships and the number of multimorbidity. The Markov multi-state transition model was used to analyze the relationship between multi-generational relationships and the severity of multimorbidity. The multistate life table was used to calculate healthy life expectancy for different multi-generational relationships.

Results

The risk of multimorbidity in two-way multi-generational relationship was 0.830 (95% CIs: 0.715, 0.963) times higher than that in downward multi-generational relationship. For mild multimorbidity burden, downward and two-way multi-generational relationship may prevent aggravation of burden. For severe multimorbidity burden, two-way multi-generational relationship may aggravate the burden. Compared with two-way multi-generational relationship, the second generations with downward multi-generational relationship has a higher healthy life expectancy at all ages.

Conclusion

In Chinese families with more than three generations, the second generations with severe multimorbidity burden may aggravate the condition by providing support to elderly grandparents, and the support provided by offspring to the second generations plays a vital positive role in improving the quality of life and narrowing the gap between healthy life expectancy and life expectancy.

Peer Review reports

Background

The world population is aging rapidly. The average life expectancy of the population globally reached 72.6 years in 2019, up 8.4 years from 1990, and is expected to reach 77.1 years in 2050 [1]. Rising life expectancy offers a valuable opportunity not only to redefine the possibilities of old age but to give new meaning to extending life [2]. However, the opportunities afforded by increased longevity are largely dependent on health, which is recognized as one key factor [3]. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, chronic diseases, especially multimorbidity, have replaced infectious diseases as the main global health burden, which are closely associated with aging [4]. Multimorbidity burden has become a major issue in the field of public health in the context of population aging, partly due to increased survival rates, improved early disease screening, and lifestyle changes [5]. In a systematic review, Nguyen et al. found that the global prevalence of multimorbidity was about 33.1% with regional variations [6]. Concepció Violan et al. showed that multimorbidity is about 95% common in older age groups [7]. In addition, multimorbidity is associated with many adverse health outcomes in the general elderly population and some specific populations (such as those who suffer from cancer, frailty, diabetes, etc.) [8,9,10]. These adverse health outcomes include reduced physical function, cognitive function, and quality of life, as well as increased utilization of health resources, and higher rates of mortality [11,12,13,14,15]. In general, multimorbidity is an important health factor that imposes a heavy physical, mental and economic burden on individuals, families, and societies.

As of 2021, the Chinese mainland had 1.43 billion people aged 65 or above, with 13.15 percent of them aged 65 or above. By 2030, the population of the Chinese mainland is expected to reach 1.42 billion, of which 258 million will be over the age of 65, accounting for 18.23 percent of the total population [1]. China is also facing the health challenge of an aging population, with the prevalence of multimorbidity among the elderly in China rising rapidly [16]. Guo et al. found that the prevalence of multimorbidity among the elderly in China is about 49.64%, and the more chronic diseases, the lower the 10-year survival rate [17]. The differences in multimorbidity patterns among the elderly in China may be related to several factors. A higher prevalence of multimorbidity was found in women, higher socioeconomic groups, and higher educational levels, and multimorbidity is also more common among older people in poorer areas than those in wealthier areas [18]. In addition, although associated cultural values and family norms vary from one society to another, family multi-generational relationships are supposed to play a pivotal role in influencing health [19]. The intergenerational family network has become a common family structure in China under the context of population aging, where co-residence or living apart but nearby are regarded as ideal living arrangements [20]. Multi-generational family structures typically include three generations (grandparents, parents, children), or four generations (grandparents, parents, children, grandchildren), in which case the second generations (parents) may play a meaningful role in the intergenerational relationship network [19]. The second generations not only take care of their elderly grandparents but also establish emotional connections and material intercourse with young children and grandchildren. Although previous studies have noticed that intergenerational relationships may have a potential health effect on the second generations in intergenerational family networks, including potential risks or benefits, less is known about the direction and strength of this effect [21,22,23,24,25,26].

A series of research questions in this study are raised in the context of Chinese families of more than three generations: a) multi-generational relationship was associated with the risk of multimorbidity for the second generations, b) multi-generational relationship was associated with the severity of multimorbidity for the second generations, and c) multi-generational relationship was associated with the healthy life expectancy and life expectancy for the second generations.

Methods

Data source and study population

The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) is a longitudinal study of individuals over age 45 in China [27]. The survey includes a rich set of questions regarding economic standing, physical and psychological health, demographics, and social networks of nationally representative aged persons. The CHARLS conducted the baseline survey in 2011 and followed it up in 2013, 2015, and 2018. A detailed description of the CHARLS was published previously [19]. For this study, inclusion criteria were: a) respond to more than two surveys, b) age at baseline ≥ 45 years, c) at least one living parent or parent-in-law, d) at least one living child, and e) contact with children weekly. In the Harmonized CHARLS, a total number of 6,799 out of 25,586 respondents met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 23 respondents were excluded because of abnormal data on follow-up outcomes, and another 8 respondents were dropped because of missing data on any covariate. The final sample size used in the study is 6,768.

Outcome definition and multimorbidity

The respondent’s history of chronic diseases was based on their answer to the question regarding whether or not a doctor has told the respondent they had a specific medical condition. We defined multimorbidity using two measures. The first measure is two or more concurrent chronic diseases in the same individual, without considering the effect of disease on function [28]. However, simply calculating the number of chronic diseases cannot fully reflect the degree of influence on the quality of life, and the influence of multimorbidity on health resource utilization and medical cost cannot be investigated solely based on the number of diseases [29]. Therefore, the second measure is cumulative indices that incorporate both the number and severity of concurrent diseases. Hu et al. developed the multimorbidity-weighted index, which covers the major chronic diseases with high incidence and severely affecting the quality of life for the middle-aged and elderly in China [30]. The individual multimorbidity burden index was calculated by adding up all the weighted chronic diseases.

Variable of interest and covariates

The variable of interest was based on the family respondent being asked about contact frequency with both his/her own and their spouse’s mother, father, or children by any means of communication. We defined: a) weekly contact only with children as downward multi-generational relationship; and b) weekly contact with grandparents and children as two-way multi-generational relationship. All models were adjusted for age at interview, gender, living in urban or rural, education, current marital status, participation in social groups, physical activity or exercise, drinking, smoking, and total household per capita consumption.

Statistical analysis

First, we used the Cox proportional hazards regression, with time since baseline assessment as the start of follow-up, to assess the association between multi-generational relationships and multimorbidity. The time to multimorbidity was derived as the difference between the time of second diagnosis and baseline. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and Schoenfeld's residuals were used to verify the proportional hazard assumption. Secondly, the Markov multi-state transition model was used to estimate the probability of transition between multimorbidity levels. We used the method of exhaustion to list the chronic disease clusters and calculate the multimorbidity burden index for each cluster. The k-means clustering algorithm was used to divide the index into five levels (S1 to S5), with higher levels representing a more severe burden of multimorbidity, and the sixth level (S6) being death. This study assumes that the multimorbidity burden may remain constant or shift to a higher level without reversal because the history of chronic diseases was retrospective. Third, we estimated the probability of transition for multimorbidity burden levels stratified by age as well as variables of interest and calculated the years of healthy life lost due to multimorbidity with the difference in life expectancy and healthy life expectancy using the multistate life tables. All tests used the two-tailed tests, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Detailed modeling information is provided in the Appendix.

Results

Characteristics of the study participants

Among the 6768 participants, 2715 (40.1%) had a downward multi-generational relationship, and 4053 (59.88%) had a two-way multi-generational relationship. Statistical differences between covariates were shown in age, gender, marriage status, education, live in urban or rural, drinking, and smoking (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of participants by multi-generational relationship [No. (%)]
Full size table

Multi-generational relationships and risk of two or more concurrent diseases

In all participants, the probability without two or more concurrent diseases declined continuously during the 7-year follow-up, and the probability of more healthy years without two or more concurrent diseases in two-way multi-generational relationship was greater than that in downward multi-generational relationship (Fig. 1). Overall, the probability without two or more concurrent diseases decreased from 0.907 (95% CIs: 0.872, 0.943) to 0.537 (0.496, 0.583) over the 7 years in two-way multi-generational relationship, and from 0.932 (0.921, 0.942) to 0.597 (0.576, 0.618) in downward multi-generational relationship. Compared to the reference group (downward multi-generational relationship), the adjusted HRs in two-way multi-generational relationship is 0.830 (P = 0.014) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The change of probability without two or more concurrent diseases of people in seven-year-follow-up, group by multi-generational relationship

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Hazard risks of two or more concurrent diseases, group by multi-generational relationship

Full size image

Multi-generational relationships and risk of multimorbidity burden state transition

Figure 3 shows the risk of multimorbidity burden state transition based on the Markov multi-state transition model. Compared with the reference group (downward multi-generational relationship), the adjusted HRs of path S1 to S3 (HRs = 0.504, P < 0.001), S1 to S4 (HRs = 0.076, P < 0.001) and S1 to S5 (HRs < 0.001, P < 0.001) in two-way multi-generational relationship were less than 1, and those of path S1 to S2 (HRs = 2.520, P < 0.001), S1 to death (HRs = 1.536, P < 0.001), S2 to S3 (HRs = 10.383, P < 0.001), S2 to death (HRs = 5.944, P < 0.001), S3 to S4 (HRs = 5.986, P = 0.003), S4 to death (HRs = 12.909, P < 0.001), and S5 to death (HRs < 0.001, P < 0.001) were greater than 1.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Hazard risks of multimorbidity burden state transition, group by multi-generational relationship

Full size image

Multi-generational relationships and healthy life years

Figure 4 shows the healthy life expectancy and life expectancy for populations with different multi-generational relationships. Healthy life expectancy at age 45 was 33.27 years (95% CIs: 33.20, 33.34) and 29.64 years (29.58, 29.70) in downward multi-generational relationship and two-way multi-generational relationship, respectively. The life expectancy at age 45 was 35.07 years (35.00, 35.14) and 31.13 years (31.07, 31.20) in downward multi-generational relationship and two-way multi-generational relationship, respectively. Compared with two-way multi-generational relationship, downward multi-generational relationship had a higher healthy life expectancy and life expectancy for all ages.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The healthy life expectancy and life expectancy for populations with different multi-generational relationships

Full size image

Discussion

In China, the most populous country in the world, the health and social problems caused by aging are urgent. Although some studies have revealed a potential relationship between intergenerational networks and health outcomes in family members, the effect on multimorbidity burden and healthy life expectancy for the second generations remains unclear. Our work based on nationally representative survey data addresses this gap and contributes to the literature in important ways. The findings suggest that the second generations who are connected to their children or grandchildren in a weekly manner via multiple communication approaches have the highest healthy life expectancy. However, for the second generations who had two-way connections with both offspring and grandparents, the risk of exacerbation increased if they already suffered from a prior severe multimorbidity.

In general, the health effects of multi-generational relationships on the second generations in Chinese families are characterized differently. One-way relationships with children and grandchildren improve quality of life by reducing the risk of multimorbidity progression, which is confirmed by this study. Evidence from the results of the Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe suggests that reduced contact with adult children by middle-aged and elderly second generations aged 50 and over affects functional limitations [31]. Pamela L Ramage-Morin et al. found that Métis over the age of 45 who had a strong family network with their children or other adult relatives and could turn to them in times of need were generally more likely to report positive self-perceived health [32]. However, the health benefits of downward multi-generational relationship may be more salient in the Chinese context than in Western countries. These differences in health effects are related to cultural differences, which were partly explained as a relative major of the norms of reciprocity and social harmony in Asian cultures [33]. The patterns characterized by mutual aid and interdependence across generations are prevalent in Chinese families, especially in rural areas [19]. The second generations in such families tend to place a stronger emphasis on family solidarity, harmony, and continuity than their peers in Western cultures. The mental health of older Chinese who had been married and had children benefited most from strong family ties than those from friendships and social communication [34, 35]. Financial and emotional support from adult children is particularly important for the Chinese second generations, which improved their life satisfaction and cognitive function and reduced depressive symptoms [36]. In short, downward multi-generational relationship brings unique health benefits for the second generations through various psychosocial pathways, including staying active in old age and enhancing their self-efficacy and self-esteem.

Another finding was that two-way multi-generational relationship attenuated the positive health effects of downward multi-generational relationship, one possible reason being the consequent burden of informal caregiving. Caring for grandparents who, like themselves, are experiencing age-related health decline can be physically and emotionally demanding for the second generations. Based on the theory of role strain and role enhancement, when the second generations with multimorbidity burden provide informal care for grandparents exceeds their own physical and psychological resources, role strain can arise and aggravate multimorbidity [37]. Chinese second generations in the extended family system often have to take on two contradictory family-centric tasks at the same time, namely the upward responsibility for taking care of the grandparents and the downward responsibility for caring for grandchildren. In this context, second generations play a central role in supporting the diverse and complex multi-generational family. However, they also are forced to be in an intergenerational relationship full of tension. Taking care of elderly grandparents with chronic illness imposes a well-documented burden on second generations, both in health effects and quality of life [38]. A study of 48 low—and middle-income countries found similarly that informal caregivers who provided help to old or weak relatives were more likely to have physical multimorbidity, especially adult caregivers [39]. Riffin et al. found that the burden of family caregivers for community-dwelling older adults in America is determined more by the characteristics of the caregiver (such as sociodemographic and health characteristics of caregivers) and the provision of caregiving tasks (such as activities of daily living related or dementia) than by the characteristics of care recipient [40]. Investing in the prevention of low-quality informal care is key to supporting second generations who suffer from stress, anxiety, or depression, and targeted interventions for mastery and caregiving competence of caregivers to grandparents have potential benefits for second generations [41, 42].

These findings together highlight the importance of family multi-generational relationships in studying the social determinants of health for family members. On the one hand, the government should encourage adult children to live nearby or together with their elderly parents. There are some difficulties in implementing this policy in China. For example, the coverage of medical insurance policies needs to be improved, and the housing policies cannot meet the needs of multi-generation cohabitation. To promote children in multi-generation families to provide support for their parents, the government should support cross-provincial medical insurance, housing supply, real estate tax, floor area ratio management, and other aspects. At the same time, attention should be paid to the people's discussion of this policy, and public opinion should be actively responded to and communicated with. On the other hand, the social pension policies will help relieve the pressure of the traditional family support model. There are many constraints on the development of the pension industry in China. It is urgent to enhance the supply capacity of the pension industry, foster the consumer market of the pension service, perfect the supervision system of the pension industry, and strengthen the construction of talent in the pension industry. The research has important implications for policymakers in China and other countries with similar social contexts.

Some limitations in this study should be acknowledged. First, the CHARLS is ambiguous about the detailed nature and direction of weekly contact with family members, such as greetings or arguments. However, it is not considered a theoretical bias because this connection should be simply regarded as intergenerational cohesion in the view of Chinese filial piety [43]. Frequent contact usually represents a strong emotional bond, the fulfillment of an obligation culturally scripted by filial piety, even if not completely voluntary. Second, it is difficult to obtain a simple upward multi-generational relationship that only provides support to grandparents. Based on traditional Chinese family values, downward multi-generational relationship between offspring and second generations is quite common. Therefore, we use two-way multi-generational relationship as a proxy to explore the health effects of upward multi-generational relationship. This limitation may lead to an underestimation of the health effects in the current study. Future study is needed to design and implement better survey instruments to capture the microscopic networks of relationships between members of the multi-generation family.

In conclusion, the multimorbidity burden and healthy life expectancy of second generations are various among different multi-generational relationship patterns in Chinese families. Although China has made efforts to implement a series of policies to promote healthy aging, such as integrating medical care into ordinary care for the elderly and developing vigorously the sharing aging industry, physical and mental health of family members is still largely determined by the family multi-generational relationship [16, 44, 45]. Any new policy design needs to consider the expectations of heterogeneous subgroups in Chinese families and be tailored to the relatively disadvantaged subgroup.

Availability of data and materials

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. The full dataset can be obtained from http://charls.pku.edu.cn/en/.

References

  1. United Nations, Department Of Economic And Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2022. Available: https://population.un.org/wpp/. Accessed 30 Nov 2022.

  2. Beard JR, Bloom DE. Towards a comprehensive public health response to population ageing. Lancet. 2015;385:658–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. Ageing and health. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Accessed 30 June 2022.

  4. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10:430–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Oostrom SH, Gijsen R, Stirbu I, et al. Time trends in prevalence of chronic diseases and multimorbidity not only due to aging: data from general practices and health surveys. PLoS One. 2016;11:e160264.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen H, Manolova G, Daskalopoulou C, Vitoratou S, Prince M, Prina AM. Prevalence of multimorbidity in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Comorb. 2019;9:1987093X-2235042X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Violan C, Foguet-Boreu Q, Flores-Mateo G, et al. Prevalence, determinants and patterns of multimorbidity in primary care: a systematic review of observational studies. PLoS One. 2014;9:e102149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Seigneurin A, Delafosse P, Trétarre B, et al. Are comorbidities associated with long-term survival of lung cancer? A population-based cohort study from French cancer registries. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1091.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiang JI, Jani BD, Mair FS, et al. Associations between multimorbidity, all-cause mortality and glycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13:e209585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall M, Dondo TB, Yan AT, et al. Multimorbidity and survival for patients with acute myocardial infarction in England and Wales: Latent class analysis of a nationwide population-based cohort. Plos Med. 2018;15:e1002501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gu J, Chao J, Chen W, et al. Multimorbidity and health-related quality of life among the community-dwelling elderly: a longitudinal study. Arch Gerontol Geriat. 2018;74:133–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pati S, Swain S, Knottnerus JA, Metsemakers JFM, van den Akker M. Health related quality of life in multimorbidity: a primary-care based study from Odisha, India. Health Qual Life Out. 2019;17:116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li H, Wang A, Gao Q, et al. Prevalence of somatic-mental multimorbidity and its prospective association with disability among older adults in China. Aging. 2020;12:7218–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Aubert CE, Fankhauser N, Marques-Vidal P, et al. Multimorbidity and healthcare resource utilization in Switzerland: a multicentre cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:708.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rizzuto D, Melis RJF, Angleman S, Qiu C, Marengoni A. Effect of chronic diseases and multimorbidity on survival and functioning in elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65:1056–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fang EF, Xie C, Schenkel JA, et al. A research agenda for ageing in China in the 21st century (2nd edition): Focusing on basic and translational research, long-term care, policy and social networks. Ageing Res Rev. 2020;64:101174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo X, Zhao B, Chen T, Hao B, Yang T, Xu H. Multimorbidity in the elderly in China based on the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. PLoS One. 2021;16:e255908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao Y, Atun R, Oldenburg B, et al. Physical multimorbidity, health service use, and catastrophic health expenditure by socioeconomic groups in China: an analysis of population-based panel data. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:e840–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu H. Physical and mental health of Chinese grandparents caring for grandchildren and great-grandparents. Soc Sci Med. 2019;229:106–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Logan JR, Bian F, Bian Y. Tradition and change in the urban Chinese family: The case of living arrangements. Social Forces. 1998;76(3):851-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/76.3.851.

  21. Jendrek MP. Grandparents Who Parent Their Grandchildren. J Marriage Fam. 1993;55:609–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leung C, Fung B. Non-custodial grandparent caregiving in Chinese families: implications for family dynamics. J Child Serv. 2014;9:307–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baker LA, Silverstein M. Preventive health behaviors among grandmothers raising grandchildren. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008;63:S304–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hilbrand S, Coall DA, Meyer AH, Gerstorf D, Hertwig R. A prospective study of associations among helping, health, and longevity. Soc Sci Med. 2017;187:109–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mahne K, Huxhold O. Grandparenthood and subjective well-being: moderating effects of educational level. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015;70:782–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Di Gessa G, Glaser K, Tinker A. The impact of caring for grandchildren on the health of grandparents in Europe: a lifecourse approach. Soc Sci Med. 2016;152:166–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. National School Of Development, Peking University. The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Available: http://charls.pku.edu.cn/en/. Accessed 30 June 2022.

  28. Kadambi S, Abdallah M, Loh KP. Multimorbidity, function, and cognition in aging. Clin Geriatr Med. 2020;36:569–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Makovski TT, Schmitz S, Zeegers MP, Stranges S, van den Akker M. Multimorbidity and quality of life: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2019;53:100903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu W, Liu Y, Yang C, et al. Developing and validating a Chinese multimorbidity-weighted index for middle-aged and older community-dwelling individuals. Age Ageing. 2022;51:afab274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Micheli K, Ratsika N, Vozikaki M, Chlouverakis G, Philalithis A. Family ties and functional limitation in the elderly: results from the Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Arch Gerontol Geriat. 2018;78:23–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramage-Morin PL, Bougie E. Family networks and health among Métis aged 45 or older. Health Rep. 2017;28:12–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Murata C, Saito T, Tsuji T, Saito M, Kondo K. A 10-year follow-up study of social ties and functional health among the old: the AGES Project. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:717.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang D, Lin Z, Chen F. Moving beyond living arrangements: the role of family and friendship ties in promoting mental health for urban and rural older adults in China. Aging Ment Health. 2020;24:1523–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ruan H, Shen K, Chen F. Negative life events, social ties, and depressive symptoms for older adults in China. Front Public Health. 2022;9:774434.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Liao S, Qi L, Xiong J, Yan J, Wang R. intergenerational ties in context: association between caring for grandchildren and cognitive function in middle-aged and older Chinese. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu L, Tang F, Li LW, Dong XQ. Grandparent caregiving and psychological well-being among Chinese American older adults—the roles of caregiving burden and pressure. J Gerontol Series A. 2017;72:S56-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jika BM, Khan HTA, Lawal M. Exploring experiences of family caregivers for older adults with chronic illness: a scoping review. Geriatr Nurs. 2021;42:1525–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jacob L, Oh H, Shin JI, et al. Informal caregiving, chronic physical conditions, and physical multimorbidity in 48 low- and middle-income countries. J Gerontol Series A. 2020;75:1572–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Riffin C, Van Ness PH, Wolff JL, Fried T. Multifactorial examination of caregiver burden in a national sample of family and unpaid caregivers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67:277–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Marfil-Gómez R, Morales-Puerto M, León-Campos Á, et al. Quality of life, physical and mental health of family caregivers of dependent people with complex chronic disease: protocol of a Cohort Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:7489.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Chan E, Glass G, Chua KC, Ali N, Lim WS. Relationship between mastery and caregiving competence in protecting against burden, anxiety and depression among caregivers of frail older adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22:1238–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Lin Z, Chen F. Evolving parent–adult child relations: location of multiple children and psychological well-being of older adults in China. Public Health. 2018;158:117–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zeng Y, Que S, Lin C, Fang Y. The expected demand for elderly care services and anticipated living arrangements among the oldest old in China based on the Andersen Model. Front Public Health. 2021;9:715586.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hu Y, Wang J, Nicholas S, Maitland E. The sharing economy in China’s aging industry: applications, challenges, and recommendations. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23:e27758.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The most important acknowledgment is to the CHARLS project group. Professor Yuan-Tao Hao gratefully acknowledges the support of K.C.Wong Education Foundation.

Funding

This work was supported by a) the National Key R & D Program of China (2022YFC3600804), b) the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82204154), c) the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515110230, 2021A1515011765), and d) the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M693594).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, 74Th Zhongshan 2Nd Rd, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Jun-Yan Xi, Si-Rui Zhong, Yu-Xiao Zhou, Xiao Lin & Yuan-Tao Hao

  2. Peking University Center for Public Health and Epidemic Preparedness & Response, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, 100191, Beijing, China

    Yuan-Tao Hao

  3. Sun Yat-Sen Global Health Institute, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Yuan-Tao Hao

  4. Center for Health Information Research, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Yuan-Tao Hao

Authors
  1. Jun-Yan Xi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Si-Rui Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu-Xiao Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiao Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuan-Tao Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jun-Yan Xi: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing—original draft. Si-Rui Zhong: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology. Yu-Xiao Zhou: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology. Xiao Lin: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration. Yuan-Tao Hao: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiao Lin or Yuan-Tao Hao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The requirement for ethical board approval was waived because this study is a secondary data analysis. All data did not contain any personally identifiable information. Therefore, there were no specific ethical issues that warranted special attention.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No competing interests were declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xi, JY., Zhong, SR., Zhou, YX. et al. Effects of family multi-generational relationship on multimorbidity and healthy life expectancy for second generations: insight from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. BMC Geriatr 23, 100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03714-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03714-z

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us