Skip to main content
Download PDF

Trajectories of mobility difficulty and falls in community-dwelling adults aged 50 + in Taiwan from 2003 to 2015

BMC Geriatrics volume 22, Article number: 902 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A decline in mobility leads to fall occurrence and poorer performance in instrumental activities of daily living, which are widely proved to be associated with older adults' health-related quality of life. To inform potential predicaments faced by older adults at different age levels, predictors of this mobility change and falls along with the ageing process need to be further evaluated. Therefore, this study examined the risk factors associated with the longitudinal course of mobility difficulty and falls among community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults in the Taiwanese community.

Methods

We evaluated data for the period between 2003 and 2015 from the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging; the data cover 5267 community-based middle-aged and older adults with approximately 12 years of follow-up. In terms of mobility, the participants self-reported difficulties in mobility tasks (eg, ambulation) and whether they used a walking device. We employed linear mixed-effects regression models and cumulative logit models to examine whether personal characteristics are associated with mobility difficulty and falls.

Results

Mobility difficulty significantly increased over time for the participants aged ≥ 60 years. Perceived difficulties in standing, walking, squatting, and running became apparent from a younger age than limitations with hand function. The probability of repeated falls increased significantly with older age at 70 (p = .002), higher level of mobility difficulty (p < .0001), lower cognitive status (p = .001), living alone (p = .001), higher number of comorbid illnesses (p < .001), walking device use (p = .003), longer time in physical activities (p < .011), and elevated depressive symptoms (p = .006). Although walking aid use increased the probability of falls, individuals with mobility difficulty had a reduced probability of repeated falls when using a walking device (p = .02).

Conclusion

Community-dwelling Taiwanese adults face an earlier mobility difficulty starting in 60 years old. Individuals with more leisure and physical activities in daily life were more likely to maintain mobility and walking safety. Long-term, regular, social, and physical activity could be a referral option for falls prevention program. The use of a walking device and safety precautions are warranted, particularly for individuals with walking difficulties.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Older adults with adequate mobility and overall functional independence are considered to have more security and a greater sense of well-being [1]. Studies [2, 3] have revealed that impaired cognition and mobility critically affect older adults’ health-related quality of life. Mobility declines and cognitive impairment often coexist and appear to have a bidirectional temporal relationship. Older adults with faster subjective cognitive decline and cognitive impairment tended to take fewer daily steps and have more mobility problems [4, 5]. Individuals with poorer gait performance than their peers may have greater cognitive decline after 10 years [6]. Moreover, the rate of decrease in gait speed was reported to differ significantly between older adults who developed mild cognitive impairment and those who did not [7]. Similar results were also found in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study [8], which indicated that baseline lower executive functions predicted subsequent declines in gait speed. Because both impaired mobility and impaired cognition result in loss of functional independence, thus increasing the risk of institutionalization and mortality, investigating the trajectories of mobility difficulty and fall among community-dwelling older adults is imperative. Understanding the key determinant of mobility difficulty and falls may inform further intervention strategies aimed at combating falls, thus maintaining or improving the functional capacity of community-dwelling older adults.

Participation with leisure and physical activities could be a determinant to middle and older adults. Several findings from studies support that individuals with adequate physical and leisure activities in daily life may gave: reduced risk of mortality [9], lower mobility difficulties [10], and better quality of life [11]. However, these studies did not comprehensively measure the mobility characteristic and did not explore longitudinal changes in the impact of leisure and physical activities in fall occurrence.

Falling is a global gerontological concern, with up to 35% of older adults reporting at least one fall annually; these falls can result in severe injuries, loss of independence, greater disability, and even death [12,13,14,15]. The consequences of falls include not only physical injuries but also fear of falls, depression, and need for advanced or long-term health care services [15, 16]. Approximately 20% to 33% of fallers sought medical services with a high prevalence of fractures, and more than 20% of those who were admitted were unable to return home at discharge [12, 13]. The consequences of older adults’ falls represent a substantial burden to health care services. The cost of treating each fall event was estimated to be approximately US$2100 per person in Scotland [12] and US$6479 to US$10,499 in Australia [15].

Fall occurrence has been suggested to predict poorer performance in instrumental activities of daily living as well as gait problems a year after the fall [17, 18]. Risk factors for falls in older adults are multifaceted and involve personal, medical, social, and environmental factors. Impaired gait and balance, being homebound, older age, female sex, diseases such as stroke and arthritis, use of high-risk medication, larger waist circumference, depressive symptoms, sensory problems, history of falls, physical environment, and walking device use have been associated with a higher risk of falls [14, 19,20,21,22,23]. In Taiwan, fall incidence ranges from 19 to 45% in older adults [17, 19, 22, 24], and is drastically elevated in those aged ≥ 70 years [17]. Fear of falling is a common result of fall experiences and frailty [17].

Walking aids, such as canes and walkers, are commonly used by those with walking limitations. Although the use of such devices helps individuals to accomplish difficult activities and increases their participation in activities [25], it poses some safety concerns. Compared with nonusers, those who use a walking device tend to have more falls [21, 22, 26, 27]. In one study, approximately 22% of older adults using assistive devices reported falls [27]. However, many falls are preventable. Use of walking aids is associated with greater fear of falling and a more conservative gait pattern [27]. Bertrand, Raymond, Miller, Ginis, and Demers [25] argued that the benefits of walking aids were determined by the user’s ability to integrate usage of the device into daily life to overcome obstacles. Although walking is generally promoted in functional training for the older population, fall prevention is critical to maintain older adults’ walking safety [20]. Hence, in this study, we examined the personal factors associated with mobility difficulty, falls, and walking device use over time in the middle-aged and older population in Taiwan by using a national database.

Methods

Study design

Data for this study were collected from the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging (TLSA), which examined healthy aging and longevity in participants aged ≥ 50 years. The TLSA was initiated in 1989 using stratified, multistage national probability sampling [28, 29], with a longitudinal and cross-sectional data set collected every 3 to 4 years. Informed consent was obtained from the participants. The present study used the data set from 2003 to 2015 with a total of 5267 community-dwelling participants. The protocol of this study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan (EC1110104-E).

Visits

Baseline data were obtained from all participants in 2003, and they were subsequently interviewed at approximately 4-year intervals over a 12-year period (total of 4 study visits). Please see Appendix A for the construction of TLSA sample. Of the 5267 participants for which baselines data were obtained in 2003, 4330, 3579, and 2890 successfully completed the interviews in 2007, 2011, and 2015, respectively.

Measurements

The participants underwent a comprehensive interview to answer the survey questions. The cognitive status of participants was assessed using 9 items of the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) and 3 sets of recall questions. Mobility was recorded using a self-reported scale addressing the difficulties in performing 9 mobility tasks. General health status was considered by collecting the following data: the number of comorbid illnesses, walking device use, depressive symptoms surveyed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D), living status, body mass index (BMI), the number of falls within 1 year, and visual and hearing impairments.

Demographics and health information

Data on age group, sex, walking device use, perceived mobility difficulty, body weight and height, the number of comorbid illness, and fall experiences were obtained through interviews and questionnaires during the study visits. Age was coded as interval groups as follows: 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, and ≥ 75 years.

Cognition

Cognitive status was assessed using the subset of SPMSQ and 3 additional questions, namely 3-item, 10-item, and backward serial recalls. The subset of SPMSQ includes the following domains: (1) orientation, (2) calculation, (3) short-term memory, and (4) language. One item of SPMSQ was excluded from the analysis because it was not assessed in 2003. The total scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating more favorable cognitive status. The Cronbach’s alpha value of the 9 items of SPMSQ with recall questions in this database ranged from 0.62—0.89 for the 4 waves, indicating an acceptable internal consistency of the scale.

Mobility

The mobility assessment consisted of 9 self-report items on participants’ difficulty to perform the following tasks without any assistance [30, 31]: (1) 15-min standing, (2) 2-h standing, (3) squatting, (4) arm lifting overhead, (5) hand grabbing and pinching, (6) object holding (up to 12 kg), (7) running (20–30 m), (8) walking (200–300 m), and (9) stair climbing (2–3 floors). Participants rated the degree of difficulty they experienced in completing the tasks on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = no difficulties, 1 = some difficulty, 2 = considerable difficulty, 3 = unable to complete). A summary score for mobility difficulty was used in the inferential analysis. The Cronbach’s alpha value of the 9 items ranged from 0.93—0.94 for the 4 waves in this database, indicating a good internal consistency.

Walking and walking device use

Walking status was determined by asking participants to rate their walking status, level of difficulty in indoor walking, and whether they use an assistive device such as a cane or a walker.

Depressive symptoms

The 10-item CES-D was used to screen for depressive symptoms in the study. The CES-D was developed and validated by Radloff [32] and contains questions that measures depressed mood, feelings of guilt and worthlessness, feelings of helplessness and hopelessness, psychomotor retardation, loss of appetite, and sleep disturbance. The participants rated how often they perceived depressive symptoms in the preceding week. Scores range from 0 to 30, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. The instrument was commonly used for community-dwelling older population and showed adequate reliabilities (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.7—0.93) [33, 34]. One item of CES-D was excluded from the analysis because it was not assessed in 2003.

Engagement of leisure activities and physical activities

The scale of leisure activity engagement consisted of 9 self-report items on whether the participant engage in the following 3 types of activities: (1) passive activities: watching television, listening to radio, and reading, (2) social activities: playing chess, gathering with relatives, friends or neighbors, and group activities (3) physical activities: gardening, walking, biking, and jogging . Physical activities was determined by asking participants the duration when they perform regular exercise each time.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, and frequencies were calculated. The variables of interest in the multivariate analysis were demographic characteristics, functional status and mobility, cognitive scores, depressive symptoms, sensory impairment, and number of comorbid illnesses. To examine whether the mobility difficulties of participants were associated with self-reported longitudinal cognitive scores, and sensory impairment, linear mixed-effects regression models were adopted. Probabilities and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each predictor variable. The association of repeated falls with mobility, walking aid use, and living alone was examined using cumulative logit regression (SAS PROC GENMOD). PROC GENMOD enabled us to obtain models with nonnormally distributed data and specification of both time-varying (ie, fall occurrence, mobility difficulty, cognitive scores, depressive symptoms, number of comorbid illnesses, sensory impairment, and walking device use) and time-constant (ie, sex) variables.

This model tested the contributions of demographic characteristics (age group, sex, living alone), walking aid use, and cognitive scores on mobility difficulty. We controlled for the potential confounding effect of BMI, education, number of comorbid illnesses, and sensory impairment as these factors have been associated with both mobility and falls in previous studies.

Multiple imputations were used to address missing values caused by attrition. The SAS MI procedure was used to generate 10 imputed data sets based on the Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Analysis results for the 10 imputed data sets were combined using PROC MIANALYSE. We used SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) to complete all analyses.

Results

Participant characteristics

In 2003, the total number of participants was 5267, of which 2696 were men and 2571 were women, yielding a male-to-female ratio of 1.05. Approximately 49.5% of the participants were younger than 65 years at baseline. Among the participants, 1933 died during the study period (593 between 2003 and 2007; 727 between 2007 and 2011; 613 between 2011 and 2015). In 2015, 2890 participants completed the follow-up interview.

Table 1 presents the demographic and health characteristics of the participants at baseline in 2003. Approximately 5.16% of the individuals reported having indoor walking difficulties, and 47 (17.28%) of them used an assistive device to walk.

Table 1 Demographic and health characteristics at baseline
Full size table

Mobility difficulty and personal characteristics

Table 2 summarizes the parameters resulting from the linear mixed-effects regression models. For the entire cohort, with the 50–54 age group as the reference group, mobility difficulties were pronounced in the 60–64 age group. Mixed regression modeling indicated that having lower cognitive scores (b =  − 0.14, p = .0326) was associated with a greater rate of mobility difficulty. Female sex (b = 1.25, p < .0001), greater number of comorbid illnesses (b = 0.51, p = .0017), lower BMI (b =  − 0.07, p = .0044), and hearing loss (b = 0.73, p = .0493) also had an increased levels of mobility difficulty. Engagement with leisure activities is also negatively associated with mobility difficulty: passive activities (watching television, listening to radio, and reading) (b =  − 0.86, p = .0031), social activities (playing chess, gathering with relatives, friends or neighbors, and group activities) (b =  − 0.80, p = .0061), and physical activities (gardening, walking, biking, and jogging) (b =  − 0.83, p = .0009). The longer workout duration also suggests slower rate of mobility difficulty (b =  − 0.66, p = .0200).

Table 2 Unstandardized parameters resulting from linear mixed effects regression models predicting mobility difficulties (n = 5267)
Full size table

The levels of difficulty in performing each mobility task were analyzed to assess how they associate with the personal and health factors. Three distinct groups of tasks were identified according to the age at which participants began to perceive difficulties, namely (1) Group A, difficulty starting from age 60: 2-h standing (b = 0.20, p < .0001), squatting (b = 0.14, p = .0001), object holding (b = 0.10, p = .0033), and running (b = 0.21, p < .0001); (2) Group B, difficulty starting from age 65: 15-min standing (b = 0.09, p = .02), walking (b = 0.14, p = .0004), and stair climbing (b = 0.21, p < .0001); (3) Group C, difficulty starting from age 75 or with no change: grabbing (b = 0.10, p = .04) and arm lifting (b = 0.08, p = .10). Figure 1 presents the grouping of the mobility tasks by age and the trajectory of the perceived difficulty over time. Difficulties in running (b =  − 0.03, p < .0001), stair climbing (b =  − 0.02, p < .0001), 2-h standing (b =  − 0.03, p < .0001), squatting (b =  − 0.02, p = .0013), and object holding (b =  − 0.02, p < .0001) were associated with lower cognitive scores. Walking, 15-min standing, grabbing and arm lifting did not have significant associations with cognitive scores. The detailed information is shown in the Appendix B.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The trajectory of perceived difficulty in performing each mobility task over time. Age was regrouped into 3 categories in this figure: < 65 years (pre-old), 65-74 years (old), and > 75 years (old-old).

Full size image

Falls and assistive walking devices

Table 3 summarizes the fall occurrence and repeated falls (fell 2 times or more) of the study. Self-reported fall occurrence in the preceding year at baseline (first visit) was 15.76%, 19.98% at the second visit, 21.12% at the third visit, and 20.62% at the fourth visit. The data revealed that 10.28% of the population aged 50–64 years and 21.24% of those aged ≥ 65 years fell in the year preceding the baseline interview. During the 12-year study with 4 visits, up to 45% of walking device users perceived their walking status as poor or very poor.

Table 3 Fall occurrence, repeated falls, and walking device use
Full size table

Table 4 presents the logit estimates for repeated falls (2 times or more) relative to the reference category. We observed a significant association of falls with follow-up time, age, cognitive scores, depressive symptoms, and number of comorbid illnesses with follow-up time exhibiting the strongest association with fall occurrence. Overall, the predictors of fall occurrence that were included in the risk profile were greater mobility difficulty (b = 0.06, p < .0001), more depressive symptoms (b = 0.02, p = .0054), higher number of comorbid illness (b = 0.08, p = .0009), living alone (b = 0.42, p = .0011), and walking device use (b = 1.45, p = .0027). Follow-up time was a significant factor for mobility difficulty and falls. No associations were noted for sex, visual impairment, or hearing loss.

Table 4 Unstandardized parameters resulting from cumulative logit models for repeated falls (n = 5267)
Full size table

We used cumulative logit models to assess whether the interaction of walking device use and indoor walking difficulty was associated with repeated falls. After controlling for age, we observed that the probability of repeated falls was associated with greater mobility difficulty, cognitive score, hearing loss, depressive symptoms, shorter duration of physical activity and living alone. Moreover, although walking device use increased the probability of repeated falls, the probability of repeated falls was significantly reduced in those with some walking difficulties and who use a walking device (interaction term: indoor walking difficulty × walking device use, b =  − 1.26, p = .0062).

Discussion

This study demonstrates the risk factors associated with mobility difficulty in a community-based population of middle-aged and older adults who were followed up for 12 years. The main findings are as follows: (1) longitudinal appearance of mobility difficulty was significantly associated with changes in cognitive score, number of illnesses, and hearing loss, starting from 60 years old. The acceleration of the perceived difficulty in each mobility task was distinctive. (2) The older population had the most risk factors for repeated falls, with strong associations noted for lower cognitive scores, living alone, and hearing loss. Walking device use in individuals with some walking difficulties could help lower the likelihood of repeated falls. (3) Engagement of physical or leisure activities in daily life could help to reduce the risk of mobility difficulty and falls.

Studies have indicated that mobility difficulty are a function of age in older adults. A widely held notion is that appearance of mobility difficulty and falls only occur in older people. However, in the TLSA study, marked increases in mobility difficulties have been noted in participants from the age of 60 years. Consistent with the results of related studies, we observed that mobility difficulties were greater in women than in men as people age. The mobility change over time suggests that functional deterioration is a critical issue in later life. This finding supports the idea that mobility difficulty signals greater vulnerability to adverse health outcomes in later life.

Some differences in the trajectories of reported mobility difficulty should be noted. Overall, the participants’ mobility dropped substantially from age 60. In terms of mobility tasks, difficulty in grabbing and arm lifting emerged mostly at an older age (75 + years), whereas difficulties in squatting, short-distance running, 2-h standing, and object holding were already noted in those aged ≥ 60 years. As people age, mobility in the lower extremities starts deteriorating. This deterioration indicates that adults may experience greater movement limitations from middle age to old age. Hand functions such as gripping or pinching are controlled by the musculoskeletal and nervous systems and are crucial for daily tasks such as driving or holding the walker; however, these functions begin to deteriorate after age 65 [35, 36]. Mobility tasks become demanding as ageing is associated with declines in skeletal muscle mass and aerobic capacity [37].

Mobility promotion initiatives should focus proactively on the lower extremities to help older adults maintain key functions such standing and walking. Multicomponent exercises involving aerobics, strengthening, progressive resistance, balancing, and dancing have been evidenced to improve balance and reduce the risk of falling for older adults [38]. Our finding also indicated that individuals with more frequent leisure activities including passive, social and physical activities, and longer duration of physical activity in daily life may have lower rates of mobility difficulties and repeated falls. In order to bridge prepared retiring population swiftly to community-based care stations where exercising programs were provided for adults. It is significant to be aware that the ongoing long-term care services or other accessible healthcare resources usually set 65 years of age as the eligibility criteria in Taiwan [39]. Therefore, older adults aged between 60 to 64 who might start experiencing the impacts of physical degeneration due to mobility change may have less opportunities to use the healthcare resources, especially when the early onset of motor degeneration is mild and unnoticeable.

Repeated falls are common in the older population [40, 41]. To date, no single factor has proven to be an adequate surrogate for predicting fall occurrences. Our study reveals a pronounced increase in fall occurrence in older people. Older adults were nearly twice as likely as middle-aged adults to report falls at baseline (21% vs 10.28%). Additionally, the cumulative logistic regression results indicated a higher likelihood of repeated falls among individuals older than 70 years, living alone, engaging shorter duration of physical activities, and reporting greater depressive symptoms. The literature provides evidence on increased falls of older adults living alone could experience greater social isolation and depression, which may lead to faster physical degeneration and falls [42]. Studies demonstrate group-based activity programs were helpful for older adults by increasing physical activities, reducing falls and social isolation [42,43,44]. Given that we found a higher likelihood of repeated falls among the 70 + year olds, living alone, reporting greater depressive symptoms, and fewer physical activity engagement, providing skills and opportunities in social and physical activity for community-dwelling population could be considered in future care plan.

Several studies have argued that walking device use is likely to result in more falls. In this study, walking device use was linked to a greater probability of falls among middle-aged and older adults. However, this does not suggest that walking device use increases falls. We also found that walking device use can significantly reduce the probability of repeated falls in those with some walking difficulties. Walking device use may involve greater cognitive demands in terms of attention or working memory, for example [45]. The risk factors for repeated falls in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults were preexisting mobility impairment, lower cognitive score, increased number of comorbid illnesses, older age, and assistive device use. The risk of mobility decline was greater when a participant used an assistive device, implying that a more severe mobility impairment increases the likelihood of the loss of independence. When care workers and clinicians observe moderate difficulty in walking, they can employ simple questions regarding the use of any assistive walking device to identify individuals who are at risk for falls and loss of walking independence and who may benefit from preventive and rehabilitative efforts designed to maintain ambulation in community.

Changes in cognitive function are thought to be fundamental to the aging process and interact with physical functioning. In this study, cognitive scores were significantly associated with the probability of repeated falls. Interventions for high-risk older adults should include cognitive training and specific programs to improve walking safety. Because health-care providers regard falls as a major problem among older adults, support for walking safety should be strengthened, especially for walking device users and those living alone. Interventions such as walking promotion, environmental adjustment, safety checks, and escorted walking are required. The present findings may be useful in the design of further mobility support and fall prevention programs. Close observation and health promotion related to the walking function of individuals should be initiated for fall-prone participants.

The strengths of this analysis include a large cohort, a 12-year follow-up, a population-based community sample, and well-designed surveys. We conducted longitudinal data analyses to elucidate the association of personal characteristics with longitudinal appearance of mobility difficulty and falls in middle-aged and older-adult groups. However, our study was limited by the choice of assessment items, the nonassessment of some items during some years, and the lack of objective measurements. Because of the limitation of secondary data analysis, we could also not examine the environmental factors that may explain increases in mobility difficulty and falls. Future studies should incorporate biomarkers as well as environmental factors to provide more comprehensive information on the predictors of mobility difficulty and falls. The models obtained in this study are associative and cannot determine causality, since we cannot determine whether mobility difficulty precedes alterations in fall occurrence or the other way around. However, our approach provides insights into how mobility difficulty evolves by assessing the data on personal characteristics over time. More longitudinal studies are necessary to understand the nature of mobility change in community-dwelling adults. Future studies using difference cutoffs with a broader definition of mobility are also needed.

Conclusion

The present results suggest that the personal characteristics of middle-aged and older adults may contribute to mobility difficulty and falls. Given that falls occur more often in those living alone or who use a walking device, prevention efforts should focus on increasing assistance with ambulation and providing supervised or scheduled walking.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the corresponding author (flkuo@nhri.edu.tw) upon reasonable request and with permission of the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan.

Abbreviations

TLSA:

Taiwan longitudinal study on aging

SPMSQ:

Short portable mental status questionnaire

CES-D:

Center for epidemiological studies-depression

BMI:

Body mass index

SD:

Standard deviation

SE:

Standard error

UWD:

Use walking device

References

  1. Davis JC, Bryan S, Li LC, Best JR, Hsu CL, Gomez C, et al. Mobility and cognition are associated with wellbeing and health related quality of life among older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the Vancouver Falls Prevention Cohort. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15(1):75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Brookmeyer R, Johnson E, Ziegler-Graham K, Arrighi HM. Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2007;3(3):186–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet. 1997;349(9063):1436–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu H-Y, Tsai W-C, Chiu M-J, Tang L-Y, Lee H-J, Shyu Y-IL, et al. Relationships Between cognitive dysfunction and health-related quality of life among older persons in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based survey. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease® & Other Dementias. 2018;34(1):41–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen S-T, Stevinson C, Tian T, Chen L-J, Ku P-W. Accelerometer-measured daily steps and subjective cognitive ability in older adults: A two-year follow-up study. Exp Gerontol. 2020;133:110874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chou M-Y, Nishita Y, Nakagawa T, Tange C, Tomida M, Shimokata H, et al. Role of gait speed and grip strength in predicting 10-year cognitive decline among community-dwelling older people. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):186.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Buracchio T, Dodge HH, Howieson D, Wasserman D, Kaye J. The trajectory of gait speed preceding mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol. 2010;67(8):980–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Atkinson HH, Rosano C, Simonsick EM, Williamson JD, Davis C, Ambrosius WT, et al. Cognitive Function, Gait Speed Decline, and Comorbidities: The Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2007;62(8):844–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lennartsson C, Silverstein M. Does Engagement with life enhance survival of elderly people in Sweden? The role of social and leisure activities. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2001;56(6):S335–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Malmberg JJ, Miilunpalo SI, Pasanen ME, Vuori IM, Oja P. Associations of leisure-time physical activity with mobility difficulties among middle-aged and older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2006;14(2):133–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rantanen T, Äyräväinen I, Eronen J, Lyyra T, Törmäkangas T, Vaarama M, et al. The effect of an outdoor activities’ intervention delivered by older volunteers on the quality of life of older people with severe mobility limitations: a randomized controlled trial. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015;27(2):161–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Craig J, Murray A, Mitchell S, Clark S, Saunders L, Burleigh L. The high cost to health and social care of managing falls in older adults living in the community in Scotland. Scott Med J. 2013;58(4):198–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stevens JA, Thomas K, Teh L, Greenspan AI. Unintentional fall injuries associated with walkers and canes in older adults treated U.S. in Emergency Departments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(8):1464–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ku Y-C, Liu M-E, Tsai Y-F, Liu W-C, Lin S-L, Tsai S-J. Associated factors for falls, recurrent falls, and injurious falls in aged men living in Taiwan veterans homes. Int J Gerontol. 2013;7(2):80–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Close JCT, Lord SR, Antonova E, Martin M, Lensberg B, Taylor M, et al. Older people presenting to the emergency department after a fall: a population with substantial recurrent healthcare use. Emerg Med J. 2012;29(9):742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. King MB, Tinetti ME. Falls in community-dwelling older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43(10):1146–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin S-I, Chang K-C, Lee H-C, Yang Y-C, Tsauo J-Y. Problems and fall risk determinants of quality of life in older adults with increased risk of falling. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15(5):579–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheng H-L, Tsai AC. Predicting the risk of falling based on ADLs and IADLs in older Taiwanese. Taiwan Gong Gong Wei Sheng Za Zhi. 2012;31(1):21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lin C-H, Liao K-C, Pu S-J, Chen Y-C, Liu M-S. Associated factors for falls among the Community-dwelling older people assessed by annual geriatric health examinations. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(4):e18976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Okubo Y, Seino S, Yabushita N, Osuka Y, Jung S, Nemoto M, et al. Longitudinal association between habitual walking and fall occurrences among community-dwelling older adults: Analyzing the different risks of falling. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;60(1):45–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Casteel C, Jones J, Gildner P, Bowling JM, Blalock SJ. Falls Risks and Prevention Behaviors Among Community-Dwelling Homebound and Non-Homebound Older Adults. J Appl Gerontol. 2016;37(9):1085–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsu H, Jhan L-J. Risk factors of falling among the elderly in Taiwan: a longitudinal study. Taiwan Geriatr Gerontol. 2008;3(2):141–54.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tseng C, Wu T, Chie W, Kuo K, Yang R, Wong WJ. Risk factors and strategies for prevention among community-dwelling and hospitalized elderly. Formosan Journal of Medicine. 2012;16:174–82.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen P-L, Lin H-Y, Ong JR, Ma H-P. Development of a fall-risk assessment profile for community-dwelling older adults by using the National Health Interview Survey in Taiwan. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bertrand K, Raymond M-H, Miller WC, Martin Ginis KA, Demers L. Walking aids for enabling activity and participation: A systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(12):894–903.

  26. West BA, Bhat G, Stevens J, Bergen G. Assistive device use and mobility-related factors among adults aged≥65years. J Safety Res. 2015;55:147–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Roman de Mettelinge T, Cambier D. Understanding the relationship between walking aids and falls in older adults: a prospective cohort study. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015;38(3):127–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zimmer Z, Martin LG, Chang M-C. Changes in functional limitation and survival among older Taiwanese, 1993, 1996, and 1999. Popul Stud. 2002;56(3):265–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Taiwan Provincial Institute of Family Planning. 1989 survey of health and living status of the elderly in Taiwan: questionnaire and survey design. Population Studies Center, University of Michigan; 1989.

  30. Nagi SZ. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Marvin BS, editor. Sociology and Rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association; 1965. p. 100–13.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nagi SZ. Disability concepts revisited; implications for prevention. In: Pope AM, Tarlov AR, editors. Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991. p. 309–27.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chang K-F, Weng L-J. Screening for depressive symptoms among older adults in Taiwan: Cutoff of a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Health. 2013;5:588–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mohebbi M, Nguyen V, McNeil JJ, Woods RL, Nelson MR, Shah RC, et al. Psychometric properties of a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D-10) scale for screening depressive symptoms in healthy community dwelling older adults. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2018;51:118–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Carmeli E, Patish H, Coleman R. The Aging Hand. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2003;58(2):M146–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Martin JA, Ramsay J, Hughes C, Peters DM, Edwards MG. Age and Grip Strength Predict Hand Dexterity in Adults. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0117598.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Brook MS, Wilkinson DJ, Phillips BE, Perez-Schindler J, Philp A, Smith K, et al. Skeletal muscle homeostasis and plasticity in youth and ageing: impact of nutrition and exercise. Acta Physiol. 2016;216(1):15–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Benedetti MG, Furlini G, Zati A, Letizia MG. The Effectiveness of Physical Exercise on Bone Density in Osteoporotic Patients. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:4840531.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Long-term care services act 2018 [Available from: https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/cp-3983-42411-201.html.

  40. Rossat A, Fantino B, Nitenberg C, Annweiler C, Poujol L, Herrmann FR, et al. Risk factors for falling in community-dwelling older adults: Which of them are associated with the recurrence of falls? J Nutr Health Aging. 2010;14(9):787–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Beauchet O, Annweiler C, Allali G, Berrut G, Herrmann FR, Dubost V. Recurrent Falls and Dual Task-Related Decrease in Walking Speed: Is There a Relationship? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(7):1265–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gupta DD, Kelekar U, Rice D. Associations between living alone, depression, and falls among community-dwelling older adults in the US. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2020;20:101273.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Skelton D, Dinan S, Campbell M, Rutherford O. Tailored group exercise (Falls Management Exercise—FaME) reduces falls in community-dwelling older frequent fallers (an RCT). Age Ageing. 2005;34(6):636–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shier V, Trieu E, Ganz DA. Implementing exercise programs to prevent falls: systematic descriptive review. Inj Epidemiol. 2016;3(16):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hunter SW, Divine A, Omana H, Wittich W, Hill KD, Johnson AM, et al. Effect of learning to use a mobility aid on gait and cognitive demands in people with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: Part II – 4-Wheeled walker. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71:S115–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants in the TLSA cohort study.

Funding

This research is funded by National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Center for Geriatrics and Welfare Research, National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan, 8, Xuefu W. Rd., Huwei Township, Yunlin County, 63247, Taiwan

    Fang-Lin Kuo, Chia-Ming Yen, Hung-Ju Chen & Zih-Yong Liao

  2. China Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan

    Chia-Ming Yen

  3. Edgewood College, Madison, WI, USA

    Yen Lee

Authors
  1. Fang-Lin Kuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chia-Ming Yen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hung-Ju Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zih-Yong Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yen Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FLK: Project design, formal analysis, writing—original draft. CMY: Writing—major review & editing. HJC: Conceptualization, writing—review and editing. ZYL: Data visualization, writing—review and editing. YL: Analysis supervision, writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fang-Lin Kuo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan (EC1110104-E). Data collected were the secondary data from the national survey and the informed consent was obtained from the participants. The procedures of the study were conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Appendix A. Construction of TLSA sample. Appendix B. Unstandardized parameters resulting from linear mixed effects regression models predicting each mobility task (n = 5267).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuo, FL., Yen, CM., Chen, HJ. et al. Trajectories of mobility difficulty and falls in community-dwelling adults aged 50 + in Taiwan from 2003 to 2015. BMC Geriatr 22, 902 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03613-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03613-3

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us