Skip to main content

Association of multi-morbidity, social participation, functional and mental health with the self-rated health of middle-aged and older adults in India: a study based on LASI wave-1


Self-rated health (SRH) is a well-established measure in public health to administer the general health of an individual. It can also be used to assess overall health status’ relationship with the social, physical, and mental health of a person. In this study, we examine the association of SRH and various socio-economic & health-related factors such as multi-morbidity status, mental health, functional health, and social participation. Data used in this paper is collated from the first wave of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) 2017-18. A total of 65,562 older adults aged 45 or above are considered in our study. Various indices (multimorbidity, social participation, functional and mental health) have been created to measure factors influencing the SRH of an individual. Overall, in the study population, around 18.4% of people reported poor SRH. Dominance Analysis results show that the contribution of multimorbidity in predicting poor SRH is highest, followed by functional health, mental health, and social participation. In a developing country like India, there is a dire need for policies having a holistic approach regarding the health and well-being of the older population.

Peer Review reports


Self-rated health (SRH) which is also known as self-perceived health, is an easy preferable, and simple measure to administer an individual’s overall health [1]. It is generally referred to as a single research question in the survey, that is, “How would you rate your overall health” with the response items “Very poor”, “Poor”, “Fair”, “Good,” and “Very good”. According to World Health Organisation (WHO), SRH is an important indicator of population health and healthy life expectancy [2]. Kaplan et al. stated SRH as a social construct [3]. It has resulted from a complex process of cognitive-emotional well-being of individuals established by the community and culture they live and follow and, can be understood as summarised measure of individual level factors that can vary a lot [1]. The SRH is considered a subjective measure and in numerous studies it is found to be highly correlated with other health measures [4,5,6,7,8]. It can also predict individual’s future health problems and their need for health care, as well as successful ageing and survival [9,10,11,12,13].

Further, other existing studies revealed that the SRH is a well-established measure in public health to administer the general health of an individual. The SRH measure has high reliability and criterion validity [14, 15] and can also be used to assess overall health status’ relationship with the social, physical, and mental health of a person [16, 17]. Therefore, SRH has been reported as one of the vital measures available to measure health outcomes [18].

According to the census 2011, the Indian older population aged 60 or above is 8.6%, accounting for 103 million elderly population [19]. By 2050 the Indian elderly population will reach around 319 million, approximately 20% share of the total population. On inclusion of the pre-retirement phase population (aged 45 and above), this share will rise to 40% of the total population [20]. Older adults play an essential role at the family and societal levels. However, with the rising older population, many concerns and vulnerabilities will also increase for this specific population. According to WHO-SAGE, every Indian older adult suffers from at least one chronic disease, which depicts the high NCDs burden in older adults [21]. Around 12.5% of middle-aged and older adults (45 and above) are found to be suffering from multi-morbidity, which has been proven to be directly associated with adverse health outcomes such as reduced physical functions [22], lower quality of life [23], poor SRH [24] and increased mortality [25]. These demographic changes will require swift actions to cope with upcoming health, economic and societal changes. Hence, it is essential to focus on the factors that determine the health of older adults and ensure their physical and mental well-being.

Although in recent times SRH has replaced clinical assessment measures in surveys, yet we only have little knowledge about how individuals form their perspective of SRH and what factors are associated with poor SRH rating, especially in the elderly population. Various individual and socio-economic factors are found to play significant role in determining SRH and have direct association with it [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Social support is linked to less stress, positive health behaviours, and a sense of security [31]. Any perceived social or financial support tends to influence the SRH of older people. According to the literature, mental and physical health are also strongly associated with SRH among the elderly [25, 32, 33].

Various disciplines have studied the determinants of SRH, but not much research has been done on the older Indian population which is increasing substantially. As we know, SRH is not only determined by physical health, age, etc.; other psycho-social factors also play a vital role in its determination. Several studies have thoroughly explored the relationship between SRH and physical health indicators such as multimorbidity, functional health and mental health. However, the association between SRH and social participation has received little attention. India has a rich sociological structure where emotional and social bonds play a vital role specially in the older age. Thus, social participation becomes more important indicator in shaping health of older adults especially in Indian context. In this study, we examined the association of SRH and various socio-economic & health-related factors such as multi-morbidity status, mental health, functional health, and social participation. We have also analysed the relative contribution of these factors in explaining the variation in SRH among the Indian older adults aged 45 or above, to have better understanding in terms of need to prioritise the factors for the improvement of overall health and well-being of study population. This study attempts to provide a more comprehensive picture of SRH, providing more clear insights of its associated factors in Indian population.

Data and methods


Data used in this paper is collated from the first wave of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) conducted in 2017-18. The LASI is a nation-wide survey dedicated to health, economic, social determinants and consequences of population ageing in India [20]. The first wave of the survey covered 72,250 older adults aged 45 and above and their spouses in India across all states and union territories except Sikkim applying a multistage stratified area probability cluster sampling design for the selection of the participants. The overall response rate of the survey was 87.3% ranging from 74.3% in Chandigarh to 96.3% in Nagaland. Detailed information on the survey design, instruments used, and data collection can be accessed from LASI India Report [20]. The present study focuses on the middle-aged and older adults aged 45 years and above. The total sample size for this study is 65,562 individuals of age 45 years and above.

Outcome variable

The SRH of the respondents was assessed based on the question ‘Overall, how is your health in general? Would you say it is very good, good, fair, poor, or very poor? In our analyses we have used the dichotomized version of this variable where “poor”, and “very poor”, were coded as “Yes”, and “very good” “good”, and “fair” were coded as “No” for poor SRH [34, 35].

Explanatory variables

Explanatory variables included in this analysis are background characteristics, health risk factors including physical activity, tobacco, and alcohol consumption, presence of multi-morbidity, functional limitations, mental health conditions, social participation, and self-rated life satisfaction. Background characteristics include the place of residence (rural and urban), age (45-59, 60-74 and 75+ years), sex (male and female), marital status (currently married, widowed, and divorced/separated/deserted/others), living arrangement (living alone, living with spouse and/or others, living with spouse & children, living with children & others, and living with others only), education level (respondents with- no schooling, less than 5 years of schooling, 5 to 9 years of schooling and 10 or more years of schooling), work status (worked in the past but currently not working, never worked and currently working), religion (Hindu, Muslim, Christian, and Others), caste/tribe (scheduled tribes, scheduled caste, other backward classes, and others), monthly per capita expenditure (poorest, poorer, middle, richer and richest quintiles), and geographical regions (north, south, east, west, north-east and central regions).

Health risk behaviours included are using tobacco (coded as never used, currently using and used in the past), drinking alcohol (ever drank alcohol coded as yes and no), and physically active (coded as active and inactive). Physical activity was assessed through questions under two heads- moderate and vigorous physical activities. Moderate physical activity includes engagement of respondents in cleaning the house, washing clothes, drawing water from a well, fetching water, gardening, bicycling at a regular pace, walking at a moderate pace, and floor or stretching exercises, whereas for vigorous activity, they were asked about their involvement in running or jogging, going to a health centre/gym, cycling, swimming, digging with a spade or shovel, chopping, farm work, heavy lifting, fast bicycling, and cycling with loads. As per WHO norms, those who were either engaged in moderate physical activity (at least 150 minutes throughout the week) or vigorous physical activity (at least 75 minutes throughout the week) or an equivalent combination of both were categorized as physically active [20].

The presence of multi-morbidity is coded as no morbidity, single morbidity, and multi-morbidity is defined as the presence of two or more morbid conditions, including hypertension, chronic heart diseases, any chronic lung disease, diabetes, any bone/joint disease, and cancer.

To assess Activities of Daily Living (ADL) limitations, LASI respondents were asked if they were having any of the following limitations and expected the limitation to last for more than 3 months: difficulty with dressing, walking across the room, bathing, eating, getting in or out of bed, or using the toilet (including getting up and down). In the LASI, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) was assessed by asking respondents if they were having any difficulties that were expected to last for at least 3 months, such as shopping for groceries, preparing a hot meal, making a telephone call, doing work around the house or garden, taking medications, managing money like paying bills and keeping track of expenses, and getting around or finding an address in unfamiliar places. In this study, we created a combination of 1 + ADL and 1 + IADL limitations for each individual and categorized them into a person having- neither 1 + ADL nor 1 + IADL, either 1 + ADL or 1 + IADL, and both 1 + ADL as well as 1 + IADLlimitations in order to assess the functional health.

LASI used the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) cognition module to measure the cognitive impairment across five domains- memory, orientation, arithmetic function, executive function, and object naming of cognition. The lowest 10th percentile of the composite score ranging from 0 to 43 refers to ‘poor’ cognition. It is used as a proxy measure of poor cognitive functioning in this study [36]. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-SF) scale, a structured interview scale, was used by the survey to diagnose probable major depression. The CIDI-SF scale score ranges from 0 to 10, and a score of three or more is used to calculate the prevalence of probable major depression [37]. The mental health conditions variable in our analysis is a combination of poor cognitive health and presence of depression symptoms where 0, 1, and 2, respectively, indicate older adults with- neither poor cognitive health nor depressive symptoms, either poor cognitive health or depressive symptoms, and both poor cognitive health and depressive symptoms.

The variable of social participation is based on response to six questions asking the frequency of attending organizations, clubs, or society’s meetings/gathering; visiting relatives/friends; attending cultural performances, shows or cinema; attending religious functions/events such as bhajan, Satsang or prayer; attending political, community or organization group meetings; and meeting with friends. Frequency was coded as 0 for never attending/visiting/meeting, 1 for at least once a year, 2 for at least once a month, 3 for at least once a week, and 4 for daily. The social participation score is the sum of all these codes ranging on a scale of 0 to 24. Further, we categorized this into three equal parts, i.e., first, second and third terciles.

Statistical analysis

We conducted the descriptive statistical analysis to examine the variation in ‘poor’ SRH by selected background characteristics, health risk behaviours, physical, functional, mental, and social health status. Further, we fit a multivariable logistic regression model to determine the adjusted effect of predictor variables on the likelihood of poor-SRH. In addition, we applied dominance analysis to quantify the relative importance of predictors of poor SRH. We selected only those variables for dominance analysis that were statistically significant in the logistic regression analyses. Dominance analysis is an extension of multiple regression popularly used in psychological research to analyse the relative importance of predictor variables in a regression model [38]. This technique first makes all possible combinations of all the predictor variables. It calculates R2 for each combination by running regression against the outcome variable and measuring the relative importance of predictor variables by pairwise comparison of the R2 values. The relative importance of the predictors is assessed based on the predictor’s percentage share in the total explained variation by the regression model. STATA-16 with ‘domin’ and ‘moremata’ packages were used to conduct statistical analysis [39].


Table 1 presents the weighted proportion of the sample reporting poor SRH and its distribution among various socio-demographic characteristics and health behaviors. It also describes the distribution of various components, i.e., multi-morbidity, functional limitations, mental conditions, and social participation, conceptualized in resulting poor SRH. The overall prevalence of poor SRH among the Indian population aged 45 above is 18.4%. The older adults in rural areas reported a higher proportion of poor SRH than the urban areas. The proportion of older adults reporting poor SRH increases with age. Female older adults have a higher proportion of poor SRH reported, i.e., 19.5% compared to 17.1% among males. With the increase in the number of years of education among adults, the proportion of people reporting poor SRH significantly declines from 21.1% in the no schooling category to 10.5% in 10 or more years of completed education category. There is not much significant difference in the proportion of poor SRH among all five quantiles of the wealth index. The widowed and separated or divorced adults report a higher proportion of poor SRH, i.e., 24.7 and 22.7%, respectively, than 16.2% among currently married older adults. The highest proportion of older adults reporting poor SRH is found in the southern region (23.3%), while the lowest is in the western region (12%). The older adults living alone reported the highest proportion of poor SRH (30.6%) among all combinations of living arrangements, including living with spouse and children (15.3%), living with children, and others (19.7%). 28.6% of older adults who have consumed tobacco in any form reported their health as poor. There is a significant difference in the proportion of older adults reporting their health as poor between physically active (14.6%) and physically inactive (25.1%) adults. 55.1% of older adults who are not at all satisfied with their lives report their health as poor compared to 13% who are completely satisfied with their lives.

Table 1 Prevalence (%) of Multi-morbidity, Functional Health Limitations, Mental Health Conditions, High Social participation Score and Poor SRH by Background Characteristics in India, LASI Wave-1, 2017-18

Table 2 describes the association of SRH with multi-morbidity, functional health limitations, mental health conditions, social participation score and life satisfaction. The adjusted odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval are reported for each category of independent variables used in the model. The odds of reporting poor SRH among older adults with more than one morbidity are 3.78 times higher [AOR: 3.78, 95% CI: (3.54,4.04)] than adults with no morbidity. The odds of reporting poor SRH also increase when the adults face functional limitations, i.e., the AOR for adults having either 1 + ADL or 1+ IADL limitations is 1.42 [95% CI: (1.34,1.51)] as compared to those having neither 1 + ADL nor 1+ IADL limitations. The likelihood of reporting poor- SRH is higher among older adults having either one [AOR: 1.74, 95% CI: (1.64,1.86)] or both [AOR: 2.77, 95% CI: (2.23,3.44)] mental health conditions. The adverse health behaviors, including consuming tobacco and alcohol, are significantly associated with poor SRH. The odds of reporting poor SRH is also higher for adults who have consumed tobacco in any form [AOR: 1.48, 95% CI: (1.33,1.64)], and ever consumed alcohol [AOR: 1.14, 95% CI (1.05,1.23)]. Physically inactive older adults are more likely to report poor SRH [AOR: 1.27, 95% CI: (1.21,1.34)].

Table 2 Logit model estimates to examine the effects of Multi-morbidity, Functional health limitations, Mental health conditions, social participation score on the poor-SRH of older adults in India, LASI Wave-1, 2017-18

Table 3 presents the results for the dominant analysis. Based on the results of logistic regression analyses, a total of 11 variables were selected for dominance analysis (only variables with a p-value less than 0.01 were selected). The software ran a total of 2047 (2^11 – 1) regressions to conduct a pairwise comparison of R2 values. Multi-morbidity is found to be the most dominant factor in terms of explaining the variation in the SRH status. The contribution of multi-morbidity towards the total variation explained by the model is 32%. Functional health and mental health are the second and third most dominant predictors in the model, with 29% and 13% contributions, respectively. Social participation was the 5th most dominant factor in the model, which contributed around 7% in the total explained variation. It is pretty evident that all the factors conceptualized in resulting SRH dominated in explaining the total variation in the model. Besides these factors, age (9.6%), physical activity (4.1%), work status (2.4%), and smoking behaviour (1.6%) also contributed to the total variation explained.

Table 3 Dominance analysis results to examine the contribution of Multi-morbidity, Functional health limitations, Mental health conditions, social participation score and other variables in explaining the poor-SRH of older adults in India, LASI Wave-1, 2017-18


This aim of the study was to outline the current status of SRH among the middle-aged and older adults in India and emphasizing on various factors related to it. The factors that need at most attention in order to improve the SRH among the elderly are multi-morbidity, functional limitations, mental health conditions, and social participation. It is essential to highlight that, even after adjusting for all relevant socio-demographic and health influencing characteristics such as tobacco and alcohol use, physical inactivity among the adults, the above listed factors still play a significant role in predicting the SRH. Our study clearly shows that individual-level health and socio-economic characteristics in addition to the community level social participation play an essential role in determining SRH status. Older people tend to rate their health based on factors that might differ from the younger people. In a country like India, older people are a prominent figure in society and play a key role in various household & societal activities. As a result of such arrangement, social interaction and active participation in these activities may boost their spirit and indirectly influence their self-rated health. The study describes the prevalence of multi-morbidity among various socio-demographic characteristics and health behaviours associated with poor SRH. Multi-morbidity has been significantly associated with poor SRH in Indian older adults [40] and various other countries [34, 41, 42]. Our result suggests that multi-morbidity is more prevalent among older adults residing in urban areas and with upper wealth quantiles. The dominance analysis found multi-morbidity to be the most contributing factor, i.e., 31.7% towards reporting poor SRH among older adults. Older adults most often tend to rate their health poor if they suffer from more than one illness at one time. This suggests the possibility of further research into different combinations of morbidities, in particular its contribution to SRH. The older adults suffering from multi-morbidity need to be prioritized in various healthy ageing programs and policies implemented by the government.

In our study, functional health has significantly influenced a person’s SRH, explaining approximately 30% variation in Dominance Analysis. It is similar to the findings of previous studies, where functional health is found to be a factor affecting the SRH of a person [43, 44]. A person’s functional health was assessed using the ADLs [45] and IADLs [46], which are considered as an indicator that is reliable and valid to measure a person’s ability to live without any support. Few studies have related ADLs to poor quality of life, as dependent people tend to have frequent hospitalization and risk of death [47,48,49,50]. The functional capacity to perform the IADLs and mobility of the person on day-to-day life basis tend to affect SRH [51]. In our study, a person with 1+ IADL and 1+ ADL is three times more likely to report poor SRH than a person with no functional limitation. Many longitudinal studies [52, 53] suggested that poor SRH predicts poor functional health, but there are also some exceptions [54] stating that higher the negative self-assessment of health higher its association with disability. A longitudinal study conducted in the United States [7] has shown that respondents having lower functional ability were at greater risk of declining SRH.

Our study has demonstrated ageing as a factor directly associated with mental health problems and reporting poor SRH among older adults in India. In the present study, it is also evident that the older adults who suffer from the presence of multiple mental health conditions have more prevalently reported poor SRH, which convey similar findings based on earlier existing literature [55,56,57]. Although multiple studies have shown the association between mental health conditions and SRH, our study results focus more on the complex and multiple covariates based on Cognitive Index and Depression (CIDI-SF scale). In our study, older people having either poor cognitive health or depression or both have a higher likelihood of reporting poor SRH, i.e., 1.7 times and 2.8 times, respectively, compared to the older person having neither of them. These findings are in accordance with the results of prior studies, conducted in different regions and populations [58,59,60,61]. Our study has also illustrated the strength of association based on Dominance Analysis, evincing mental health problems at the third position after multi-morbidity and functional health. Mental health issues are predictors of poor SRH, and the present study also provokes further discussion in this area of research.

The results suggest that older adults with higher social participation scores are less likely to report poor SRH. Our results also indicate that social participation is the fifth most important factor explaining the 6.9% variation in poor SRH. Socially isolated individuals are at an increased risk of poor health outcomes [62] because of their limited source of emotional support and information [63, 64]. Organizational memberships, trust by society, cognitive involvement, or other social participation indicators have shown critical importance in determining good SRH and providing better outcomes in terms of health [62].


In this study, there are a few limitations. We have dichotomized the SRH variable from a 5-point scale to conduct a binary logistic regression analysis. This is likely to result in a loss of information regarding the actual SRH. For constructing the multi-morbidity index, we have considered only six major morbidities reported in the LASI report, which are self-reported by the respondents. This may likely underestimate the actual prevalence of the morbidities. The missing cases of most of our key variables were less than 1.5%, except for mental health, in which the missing cases were approximately 11%. The mental health factor is based on the composite cognition and depression scores. The Combined Cognition score ranges from 0 to 43 and includes score for orientation (0-8), object naming (0-2), arithmetic function (0-9) and executive function (paper folding & pentagon drawing) (0-4) and total word recall (0-20). Thus, the imputation for mental health factor was highly complex, seeing the scope of this study. The indicators used for calculating the social participation scores are not exhaustive. The total variation explained by the regression model in Dominance Analysis was only 14% (R2 = 0.139) which is substantially low from the desired R2. The low model R2 makes it challenging to conclude the most important predictors of an outcome.


This study found that around one-fifth of the Indian older population has rated their health as poor. We examined the factors predicting the poor SRH. Individuals having multi-morbidity and functional limitations are more likely to rate their health poorly. Other than that, we found an individual's social participation can also be a significant factor. There is a need to have a more holistic approach towards the health of older adults in India. Awareness and availability of proper care and facilities are required. Policies focusing on the social, mental, and physical well-being of an individual are required to promote healthy ageing.

Our finding is in concordance with prior research literature and shows that main determinants such as mental, physical and social health are the most important factors in achieving better SRH. Our results will also be important for policymakers in allocating and planning appropriate human resources for India’s older adults and elderly as the share of this population is increasing in India over time. Our finding might also encourage other researchers to explore a new perspective which can be utilized in the best strategic development and interventions to achieve better SRH through its determinants.

Availability of data and materials

International Institute for Population Sciences was the nodal agency for collecting LASI Wave-1 data on behalf of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. The de-identified version of the LASI Wave-1 data is publicly available to the researchers and policymakers upon formal request to the International Institute for Population Sciences for access (link to the data request document LASI_DataRequestForm_0.pdf ( and link for the other information for LASI data set LASI Wave-I | International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (



Self-rated health


Longitudinal Ageing Survey in India


Adjusted Odds Ratio


World Health Organisation


Activities of Daily Living


Instrumental Activities of Daily Living


Scheduled Caste


Scheduled Tribe


Other Backward Classes


None of the Above


Composite International Diagnostic Interview- Short Form


  1. Jylhä M. What is SRH and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(3):307–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Bruin A. Health Interview Surveys: Towards International Harmonization of Methods and Instruments. Denmark (39 Swiss francs): WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No. 58. Office of Publications, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Scherfigsvej 8, DK-2100 Copenhagen 0; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res. 1976;11(4):478.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Doorslaer EV, Koolman X, Jones AM. Explaining income-related inequalities in doctor utilisation in Europe. Health Econ. 2004;13(7):629–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan G, Baron-Epel O. What lies behind the subjective evaluation of health status? Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(8):1669–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cousins SO. Validity and reliability of self-reported health of persons aged 70 and older. Health Care for Women International. 1997;18(2):165–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gold M, Franks P, Erickson P. Assessing the health of the nation: the predictive validity of a preference-based measure and SRH. Med Care. 1996;1:163–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jylhä M, Volpato S, Guralnik JM. SRH showed a graded association with frequently used biomarkers in a large population sample. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(5):465–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huisman M, Deeg DJ. A commentary on Marja Jylhä's “what is SRH and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model” (69: 3, 2009, 307–316). Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(5):652–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fayers PM, Sprangers MA. Understanding SRH. Lancet (London, England). 2002;359(9302):187–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Idler EL, Benyamini Y. SRH and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;1:21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mossey JM, Shapiro E. SRH: a predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1982 Aug;72(8):800–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tate RB, Lah L, Cuddy TE. Definition of successful aging by elderly Canadian males: the Manitoba follow-up study. The Gerontologist. 2003;43(5):735–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lundberg O, Manderbacka K. Assessing reliability of a measure of SRH. Scand J Soc Med. 1996;24(3):218–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zajacova A, Dowd JB. Reliability of SRH in US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(8):977–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Garrity TF, Somes GW, Marx MB. Factors influencing self-assessment of health. Social Science & Medicine. Part a: Medical Psychology & Medical. Sociology. 1978;1(12):77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maddox GL. Some correlates of differences in self-assessment of health status among the elderly. J Gerontol. 1962.

  18. Rohrer JE, Arif A, Denison A, Young R, Adamson S. Overall self-rated health as an outcome indicator in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;13(6):882–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elderly in India. Ministry of Statistics and programme implementation. 2016. Accessed on 21 October 2021.

  20. Longitudinal ageing study in India (LASI) Wave 1, India report. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), National Programme for Health Care of Elderly (NPHCE), MoHFW, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health (HSPH) and the University of Southern California (USC). 2020.

  21. Arokiasamy P, Kowal P, Capistrant BD, Gildner TE, Thiele E, Biritwum RB, et al. Chronic noncommunicable diseases in 6 low-and middle-income countries: findings from wave 1 of the World Health Organization's study on global ageing and adult health (SAGE). Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185(6):414–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kadam UT, Croft PR, North Staffordshire GP Consortium Group. Clinical multimorbidity and physical function in older adults: a record and health status linkage study in general practice. Fam Pract. 2007;24(5):412–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fortin M, Lapointe L, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Ntetu AL, Maltais D. Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2(1):1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Galenkamp H, Braam AW, Huisman M, Deeg DJ. Somatic multimorbidity and SRH in the older population. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011;66(3):380–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoeymans N, Feskens EJ, Kromhout D, Van den Bos GA. The contribution of chronic conditions and disabilities to poor SRH in elderly men. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences. 1999;54(10):M501–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Strawbridge WJ, Wallhagen MI. SRH and mortality over three decades: results from a time-dependent covariate analysis. Research on Aging. 1999;21(3):402–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Craig BA, Morton DP, Morey PJ, Kent LM, Gane AB, Butler TL, Rankin PM, Price KR. The association between SRH and social environments, health behaviors and health outcomes: a structural equation analysis. BMC Public Health 2018 ;18(1):1-0.

  28. Kaplan GA, Goldberg DE, Everson SA, Cohen RD, Salonen R, Tuomilehto J, et al. Perceived health status and morbidity and mortality: evidence from the Kuopio ischaemic heart disease risk factor study. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(2):259–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Damian J, Ruigomez A, Pastor V, Martin-Moreno JM. Determinants of self assessed health among Spanish older people living at home. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(7):412–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldberg P, Guéguen A, Schmaus A, Nakache JP, Goldberg M. Longitudinal study of associations between perceived health status and self reported diseases in the French Gazel cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55(4):233–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Family relationships, social support and subjective life expectancy. J Health Soc Behav. 2002;1:469–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nakano A. The relationship between mental health and SRH in older adults. Japan: Kobe University; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Andrew DH, Dulin PL. The relationship between self-reported health and mental health problems among older adults in New Zealand: experiential avoidance as a moderator. Aging Ment Health. 2007;11(5):596–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mavaddat N, Valderas JM, Van Der Linde R, Khaw KT, Kinmonth AL. Association of SRH with multimorbidity, chronic disease and psychosocial factors in a large middle-aged and older cohort from general practice: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Assari S, Lankarani MM. Does multi-morbidity mediate the effect of socioeconomics on SRH? Cross-country differences. Int J Prev Med. 2015;6:85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pandav R, Fillenbaum G, Ratcliff G, Dodge H, Ganguli M. Sensitivity and specificity of cognitive and functional screening instruments for dementia: the indo-US dementia epidemiology study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(3):554–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kessler RC, Üstün TB. The world mental health (WMH) survey initiative version of the world health organization (WHO) composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13(2):93–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Azen R, Budescu DV. The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychol Methods. 2003;8(2):129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Luchman J. DOMIN: Stata module to conduct dominance analysis.

  40. Arokiasamy P, Uttamacharya, Jain K. Multi-morbidity, Functional limitations, and SRH among older adults in India: cross-sectional analysis of LASI pilot survey, 2010. Sage Open. 2015;5(1):2158244015571640.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ishizaki T, Kobayashi E, Fukaya T, Takahashi Y, Shinkai S, Liang J. Association of physical performance and SRH with multimorbidity among older adults: results from a nationwide survey in Japan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019;1(84):103904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sheridan PE, Mair CA, Quiñones AR. Associations between prevalent multimorbidity combinations and prospective disability and SRH among older adults in Europe. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):1–0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Barsky AJ, Cleary PD, Klerman GL. Determinants of perceived health status of medical outpatients. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(10):1147–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Johnson RJ, Wolinsky FD. The structure of health status among older adults: disease, disability, functional limitation, and perceived health. J Health Soc Behav. 1993;1:105–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function jama. 1963;185(12):914–9.

  46. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist. 1969;9(3_Part_1):179–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Branch LG, Ku L. Transition probabilities to dependency, institutionalization, and death among the elderly over a decade. Journal of Aging and Health. 1989;1(3):370–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gillen P, Spore D, Mor V, Freiberger W. Functional and residential status transitions among nursing home residents. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Med Sci. 1996;51(1):M29–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Manton KG. A longitudinal study of functional change and mortality in the United States. J Gerontol. 1988;43(5):S153–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wolinsky FD, Callahan CM, Fitzgerald JF, Johnson RJ. Changes in functional status and the risks of subsequent nursing home placement and death. J Gerontol. 1993;48(3):S94–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Gama EV, Damian JE, Perez de Molino J, López MR, Lopez Perez M, Gavira Iglesias FJ. Association of individual activities of daily living with SRH in older people. Age Ageing. 2000;29(3):267–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Crimmins EM, Saito Y. Getting better and getting worse: transitions in functional status among older Americans. Journal of Aging and Health. 1993;5(1):3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rodin J, McAvay G. Determinants of change in perceived health in a longitudinal study of older adults. J Gerontol. 1992;47(6):P373–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ferraro KF, Farmer MM, Wybraniec JA. Health trajectories: long-term dynamics among black and white adults. J Health Soc Behav. 1997:38–54.

  55. Lachytova M, Katreniakova Z, Mikula P, Jendrichovsky M, Nagyova I. Associations between SRH, mental health problems and physical inactivity among urban adolescents. The European Journal of Public Health. 2017;27(6):984–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ocampo JM. SRH: importance of use in elderly adults. Colombia Médica. 2010;41(3):275–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Meyer OL, Castro-Schilo L, Aguilar-Gaxiola S. Determinants of mental health and SRH: a model of socioeconomic status, neighborhood safety, and physical activity. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(9):1734–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Bond J, Dickinson HO, Matthews F, Jagger C, Brayne C. SRH status as a predictor of death, functional and cognitive impairment: a longitudinal cohort study. Eur J Ageing. 2006;3(4):193–206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Pinto JM, Fontaine AM, Neri AL. The influence of physical and mental health on life satisfaction is mediated by SRH: a study with Brazilian elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;1(65):104–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ishida M, Montagni I, Matsuzaki K, Shimamoto T, Cariou T, Kawamura T, Tzourio C, Iwami T. The association between depressive symptoms and SRH among university students: a cross-sectional study in France and Japan. BMC psychiatry 2020; 20(1):1-0.

  61. Chang-Quan H, Xue-Mei Z, Bi-Rong D, Zhen-Chan L, Ji-Rong Y, Qing-Xiu L. Health status and risk for depression among the elderly: a meta-analysis of published literature. Age Ageing. 2010;39(1):23–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Hurtado D, Kawachi I, Sudarsky J. Social participation and SRH in Colombia: the good, the bad and the ugly. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(4):584–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lee S. Social participation and health at the country level. Soc Sci J. 2018;55(1):37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Tegegne MA. Linguistic integration and immigrant health: the longitudinal effects of interethnic social participation. J Health Soc Behav. 2018;59(2):215–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge the LASI-survey, which was done by nodal agency International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, for providing the relevant data for this study.


No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



The concept was drafted by GR; All authors assisted in paper conceptualization and contributed to draft the manuscript. GR and AM carried out the statistical analysis. AS and GR reviewed and modified with the contributions to the original manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gursimran Singh Rana.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable; this is a secondary-data based study. No individual could be identified or contacted; individual researchers required no ethics approval to undertake this study. International Institute for Population Sciences collected the LASI Wave-1 data under the approved ethical consideration of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) guidelines. (Please refer to the document National ethical guidelines for biomedical and health research involving human participants link to the document-ICMR_Ethical_Guidelines_2017.pdf).

Consent for publication

Not applicable for this study.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rana, G.S., Shukla, A., Mustafa, A. et al. Association of multi-morbidity, social participation, functional and mental health with the self-rated health of middle-aged and older adults in India: a study based on LASI wave-1. BMC Geriatr 22, 675 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • SRH
  • Elderly health
  • Mental health
  • Functional health
  • Social participation index
  • Older adults