Skip to main content

Prevalence and correlates of disability among urban–rural older adults in Southwest China: a large, population-based study

Abstract

Background

As one of the challenges of aging, older adults with disabilities are often overlooked in remote areas of many developing countries, including southwest China. Similar populations would undoubtedly benefit from a representative, high-quality survey of large samples, which would also enrich global disability data. This study aims to assess the prevalence of disability and associated factors among urban and rural older adults in a typical representative region.

Method

A large-scale baseline survey was conducted between March and September 2020 using face-to-face interviews with a multistage stratified random sample of 16,536 participants aged ≥ 60 years. Disability was assessed using the BI scale, with a score of 100 representing normal status, 65–95 as mild disability, 45–60 as moderate disability, and 0–40 as severe disability. The prevalence of disability was estimated by demographics and health characteristics, and their associations were explored by robust Poisson regression analysis.

Results

The prevalence of disability among older adults was 19.4%, and the prevalence of mild, moderate, and severe disability was 16.8%, 1.5%, and 1.1%, respectively. All variables, including older age, residence in a rural area, higher number of hospitalizations, comorbidities, poor self-rated health, falls, cognitive impairment, mental impairment, and alienation from friends and relatives, were shown to be associated with a higher adjusted prevalence of disability. Only formal education can reduce the risk of disability.

Conclusion

The prevalence of disability among older adults is high in both urban and rural settings in southwest China, and a number of important factors associated with disability have been identified. In addition to increased attention to the health status of older adults, further research on scientific management and effective disability interventions is needed.

Peer Review reports

Background

The term disability was first defined by Nagi in the 1960s [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed an updated framework [2] in 2002, which considers the term as an umbrella term for impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions, and emphasizes that disability is a long-term interaction between the person and the overall environment in which the person lives. This implies that disability is a complex and multifactorial state involving multiple risk factors. Currently, there are no uniform standards and methods for assessing and classifying disability in older adults. In order to obtain comparable global health data, various tools for measuring disability have been developed [3,4,5,6,7]. The most commonly used one is the Barthel Index (BI) [8], which can evaluate the ability of older adults to perform daily living activities. It is characterized by its simplicity of operation, good reliability and sensitivity [9].

Human life expectancy has reached an all-time high and is on the rise [10], which will lead to the emergence of a large number of older adults with different degrees of disability [11]. Disability not only affects the quality of life and health outcomes of those people, but also significantly increases the cost of care [12]. Collecting data from representative studies in 37 countries, WHO reports that 14% of the 514 million older people (60 years and older) lack the basic skills to lead a meaningful and dignified life [10]. By the end of 2015, China's elderly population had reached 40.63 million, accounting for 18.3% of older adults in the same period [13]. It is conceivable that China, as the largest developing country globally, is facing a great socioeconomic burden.

Previous studies have explored a range of factors that may affect the physical functioning, activity, and social participation of older adults, including but not limited to sociodemographic characteristics, social networks, self-perceived health, cognitive functioning, mental health, disease burden, and repeat hospitalizations [14,15,16,17,18]. Since 2005, many similar studies have been conducted in most regions of China, but few studies have been conducted in the Southwest [19,20,21,22]. Given the regional differences in social and economic development, there are significant disparities in education, employment opportunities, social welfare, medical resources, and geriatric care services between Southwest and the eastern coastal regions of China. Sichuan Province, a representative province in southwest China, is characterized by a large rural population, a low level of education for the overall population, a multi-ethnic population, and uneven development across regions. Its GDP per capita is far below that of the eastern provinces [23]. In addition, data from the sixth national census released by China's National Bureau of Statistics in 2011 shows that Sichuan province has the largest population and the most severe aging problem in the southwest. This means that the disability of a large elderly population in this less developed part of the country has not received the attention it deserves. Although the local government has introduced some policies on care services for the disabled elderly, the overall disability situation in the province is not clear. Therefore, this study was conducted at a province-wide level to determine the prevalence and influencing factors of disability among the elderly in urban and rural areas of the province, so as to provide scientific references for local government interventions and the development of care policies.

From the above analysis, there are three gaps between this study and the previous ones. First, although disability among older adults is relatively common and has a significant impact on individuals, families, and society, relevant research is rare in the less developed regions of southwest China. Second, few large-scale studies specifically address disability among older adults in urban and rural communities. Finally, few studies on disability in the elderly encompass social factors, physical health, mental health, and cognitive function functioning.

Method

Participants

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in several districts/counties of Sichuan from March to September 2020. A total sample size of 16,536 older adults (age ≥ 60 years) was obtained through a multistage stratified random sampling procedure based on the latest resident population information in Sichuan, which was determined based on the following assumptions: prevalence = 20%, sampling error = 5.0%, CI = 95.0%, and non-response rate = 20.0%. The stratification in the sampling plan includes: 1) Based on the different characteristics of the age structure of the elderly in various cities and prefectures in Sichuan Province, the elderlies in various regional groups in the province are divided into four age groups: 60–69 years old, 70–79 years old, 80–89 years old and 90 years old and above; 2) Considering the characteristics of the population density distribution and economic zone development in Sichuan Province, the 21 prefectures in Sichuan Province are divided into six regional groups; 3) The third layer is districts/counties within each group in the second tier. We sampled the age groups and regional layers in equal proportions in turn, conducted systematic sampling in the third layer, and finally performed random sampling in the selected districts/counties. The sex ratio of subjects was controlled according to the sixth national census statistics.

Data Collection

Physicians and nurses from local primary care facilities constituted the majority of the interviewers. They were asked to attend a comprehensive training course at the National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics prior to the assessment, where they were trained in the use of Electronic Data Capture (EDC) to collect data through face-to-face interviews. Only those who passed both the theoretical and practical exams received a certificate of eligibility from the center. In addition, missing or incorrect questionnaires were reassessed. The entire assessment process of the survey was under the scrutiny of specialized personnel sent from their parent organization.

Disability Measurement

The ADL was measured by the BI scale, which were essential in evaluating the independence of self-care among the aged [24], including personal hygiene, bathing self, feeding, toilet, stair climbing, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, ambulation, and chair/bed transfers. Its excellent reliability and validity values, as well as specific increments and values, have been detailed in previous studies [25]. The BI scale was used to assess disability, with scores of 0–40 representing severe impairment in activities of daily living, 45–60 representing moderate impairment, and 65–95 representing mild impairment.

Characteristics

This study conceptualized the factors influencing disability into two areas: social factors and health status. Social factors included demographics such as age, gender, race, place of residence, marital status, education level, pre-retirement occupation, and consumption level. Health factors included hospitalization, chronic illness, self-rated health, accidents, cognitive status, and mental health. The hospitalization rate in the previous year, chronic disease, self-rated health and accidents within one month were recorded based on the subjects' reports. Comorbidity was defined as the presence of two or more chronic conditions at the same time. Based on the subjects' assessments, their self-rated health status was classified into three categories, including poor, general, and good.

The cognitive state was measured using the Mini-cog test widely used with high reliability and validity [26]. The test consisted of a 3-word recall and clock drawing test (CDT). Subjects who recalled 0 words were classified as "dementia", those who recalled 1–2 words were classified according to the CDT (abnormal = "MCI", normal = "normal"), and those who recalled 3 words were classified as "normal".

Anxiety symptoms were screened by GAD-2 [27], with subjects with a score ≥ 3 being regarded as anxious, and depressive symptoms were evaluated by PHQ-2 [28], with subjects with a score ≥ 3 being regarded as depressed. Subjects with both depressive and anxiety symptoms were assigned to the "comorbid depressive and anxiety symptoms" group, those with anxiety symptoms alone to the "Anxiety" group, those with depressive symptoms alone to the "Depression" group, and those with none of the above symptoms to the "normal" group.

Family and friend networks were assessed using LSNS-6 [29], which was highly reliable and valid and has been used in many countries [30]. This measurement involves six questions: three for friend ties and three for family ties. Each question was scored on a scale of 0 to 5, with scores ranging from 0 to 30. "Social isolation" was considered for a total score of < 12. When the total scores ≥ 12, subjects with a score of < 6 for the friend part were classified as "alienation from friends", and those with a score of < 6 for the family part as "alienation from relatives".

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were described as mean ± SD, and categorical variables were described as percentages (n, %). T-test and X2 test were adopted to compare the differences in demographic and health characteristics between groups, and logistic regression models were performed to correct for relevant confounders. We chose a robust Poisson regression model for the analysis [31, 32]. The specific model assumptions can be found in Supplemental Files (S1). Robust Poisson random effects models can be implemented through GLMs (link function: log, error distribution: Poisson) in Stata 15.1. The multivariate model with minimum Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) was considered the best fitting model. All analyses were performed with Stata 15.1, and  < 0.05 (two-sided) were considered statistically significant.

Results

Prevalence and distribution of disability

A total of 15,385 responses were collected, including 8368(54.4%) from female respondents. In this study, 19.4% of the subjects experienced disability, and the incidence of mild, moderate, and severe disability was 16.8%, 1.5%, and 1.1%, respectively. Significant differences were found in the distribution of disability by age group, gender, and area of residence (S2, Fig. 1). Figure 1 shows that the older people are, the higher the prevalence of disability and the degree of impairment. The prevalence of the three types of disabilities increased sharply among people aged 70–79 years, and the proportion of people with severe disabilities reached 36.6% among those aged 90 years or older. Among those with severe disabilities, the gender gap was the largest, with women accounting for 60.5%. In addition, we found that 51.1% of older adults with disabilities were from rural areas, more than 50% of older adults with mild and moderate disabilities were from rural areas, while only 48.8% of older adults with severe disabilities were from rural areas.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A combination of three figures. Disability was divided into three levels: mild, moderate and severe. Age was divided into four groups. The one on the left showed the distribution of different disabilities by age. The middle one showed the distribution of different disabilities by genders. The one on the right showed the distribution of different disabilities by residency areas

The social relevance of disability

In the present study, the mean age of the disabled group (77.7 ± 9.5 years) was greater than that of the non-disabled group (70.7 ± 6.8 years). As shown in Table 1, there was a statistically significant difference between the different age groups (P < 0.001). It was found that people with disabilities were more likely to be older women and people living in rural areas or former farmers (P < 0.001). In addition, disability was more common among older adults who were widowed, had no formal education, or had low consumption levels (P < 0.001). The results also showed that alienation from relatives and friends was significantly associated with disability (P < 0.001).

Table 1 Distribution of disability by demographics characteristics

Health-related factors of disability

As shown in Table 2, the distribution of disability by health characteristics showed a correlation between disability and hospitalization rates/days (P < 0.001). Disability was more common in patients with chronic conditions, and its incidence increased with the number of comorbid conditions (P < 0.001). As expected, the number of disabilities increased with worsening self-rated health status and the incidence of falls (P < 0.001). In addition, impairment in cognitive function and the occurrence of depressive and anxiety symptoms were significantly associated with the incidence of disability (P < 0.001).

Table 2 Distribution of disability by health Characteristics

Distributions of ADL Component

Table 3 and Fig. 2 show the distribution of impairments for the different items in the BI scale. Functional impairments in older adults with mild disabilities mainly included stair climbing (73.1%), bladder control (27.3%), and chair/bed transfer (24.6%). Those with moderate to severe disabilities showed similarities in limitations in abilities, mainly involving lower limb function. Figure 3 confirms that the incidence of impairments in all daily activities under assessment saw a significant increase with aging, among which the impairment of climbing was the earliest and the most common one, followed by ambulation, chair/bed transfers, and bathing, at a generally consistent pace.

Table 3 Prevalence of impairment for individual items in different groups
Fig. 2
figure 2

Distributions of ADL disability in different items. The radar chart showed us the rate of impairment of 10 competencies in the BI of the older adults at each level of disability

Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of different ability-impaired people in different age groups. It showed us the rate of impairment of 10 competencies in the BI of the older adults at different age groups

Factors Associated with Disability

Based on the results of many correlation studies and univariate analysis, we finally included 14 relevant variables to construct different models [16, 18, 33,34,35,36]. The best fitting model had an AIC value of 0.88, a BIC value of -140,574.20. After adjusting for all significant variables (S3, Fig. 4), older age (RR = 4.32; 3.88–4.82), living in rural areas (RR = 1.14; 1.08–1.21), increased hospitalization (RR = 1.19; 1.09–1.30), co-morbidity (RR = 1.41; 1.31–1.52), self-rated poor health ( RR = 2.84; 2.52–3.21), recent falls (RR = 1.19; 1.08–1.32), MCI (RR = 1.30; 1.20–1.40), dementia (RR = 1.78; 1.62–1.95), anxiety (RR = 1.35; 1.15–1.59), depression (RR = 1.29; 1.16–1.45), comorbid depressive and anxiety symptoms (RR = 1. 47; 1.34–1.62), alienation from friends (RR = 1.15; 1.06–1.25), and social isolation (RR = 1.13; 1.05–1.22) increased the risk of disability in older adults (P < 0.05). Only higher levels of education could be used as a protective factor for disability. In the fully adjusted model, gender, marital status and consumption level were no longer associated with the prevalence of disability (P > 0.05).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Factors associated with disability. Adjusted rate ratio were calculated using robust Poisson regression. Adjusted for all variables. Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval, MCI = mild cognitive impairment

Discussion

In this study, the prevalence of disability among older adults in Sichuan Province was 19.4%, higher than the worldwide average [37], as well as the results in the reports of many countries such as Poland [38] and some domestic studies [39]. Such a high disability rate among the elderly in a place with low per capita income, severe aging, a significant exodus of the working population, uneven regional development, and limited medical resources undoubtedly poses a considerable challenge to the local health care system [23, 40]. The key to solving this problem lies in reliable estimation and effective disability prevention. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence and influencing factors of disability among the elderly in urban and rural Sichuan, which is of great significance. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large-scale survey of disability in urban and rural areas in southwest China. Theoretically, these results can be generalized to Southwest China and other populations with similar characteristics.

Similar to the findings of other scholars [34], the earliest and most severe impairments in the disabled elderly involved their lower limb function, such as stair climbing, ambulation, and bathing self. The worsened lower limb function can be explained by related factors. 1) Natural aging reduces lower limb muscle strength and quality [41]; 2) Chronic diseases, such as osteoarthritis [42], diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [43], and falls will cause mobility limitation, further decreasing their physical function; 3) Dementia will cause gait disorders, decreased balance function, and increased risk of falls, eventually increasing physical dependence [44]; 4) In the case of repeated hospitalization [45], physical inactivity in the elderly, prolonged bed rest, and reduced intake all decrease lower limb function. Therefore, it is crucial to maintain lower limb mobility in the elderly and promote post-injury rehabilitation. Health education and targeted physical activity interventions have been introduced in many countries [46]. However, the rapid aging of the population continues to leave low- and middle-income countries unprepared. In 2016, the Chinese government included "healthy aging" in its national development program and introduced long-term care insurance for the elderly with disabilities in many pilot cities [47]. This insurance focuses on financial compensation, while care services are mostly provided by third-party institutions. The quality and quantity of daily care services still do not meet the existing needs of these elderly people. 39.6% of elderly people with disabilities self-rated their health as poor, which may be related to unmet needs [48]. What is certain is that the burden of care for moderate and severe disabilities is high. We need to reduce the future burden of care by working to prevent mild disabilities, especially in economically disadvantaged areas [49]. By developing appropriate physical activity patterns, improving the quality of chronic disease management, and optimizing inpatient management concepts, we can maximize the prevention of lower extremity mobility loss in older adults.

The results of this study suggest that aging contributes to the onset and progression of disability, as has been confirmed in numerous articles [50]. However, follow-up cohort studies are still needed to elucidate the specific trajectory of disability. Aging poses a number of psychiatric problems in older adults that are caused by many factors, including: 1) decreased sensory function [51]; 2) decreased adaptability to environmental changes and social roles and status; and 3) increased likelihood of exposure to negative life events, such as retirement and death of a relative. In this study, 8.2% of the elderly screened positive for mental disorders, and the rates of positive depression and anxiety-depression comorbidity were significantly higher in the disabled elderly. In addition, less interaction with family and friends increased the incidence of disability. However, alienation from family alone did not have a statistically significant effect on disability, which may be related to the current situation of empty nesters in China. Older adults rely more on interactions with friends than the next generation who are busy with work. According to the meta-analysis, the prevalence of depression among Chinese empty nesters was 38.6% [52]. Research suggests a bidirectional relationship between social isolation and depression or anxiety, which naturally accelerates the onset of disability [53]. However, public spending on mental health in developing countries remains low and is mostly focused on psychiatric hospitals [54]; while, these hospitals do not provide community mental health services that can provide long-term care and support. As early as 2004, China attempted to establish a comprehensive community mental health system; however, the system continues to face significant challenges due to low national awareness of the need for mental health services, lack of specialized physicians, and financial difficulties [55]. This study will provide a reference for regional epidemiological data on mental disorders in the elderly, and also call for relevant authorities to pay attention to the mental health problems of the elderly.

Consistent with previous studies [56], our findings suggest a strong association between cognitive function and disability. The survey showed that 1,179 elderly people had positive dementia screening results, and the proportion of dementia in the disabled population was 4.8 times higher than that in the non-disabled population, which fully indicates that dementia is an important cause of loss of self-care in the elderly. As the country with the largest number of dementia patients in the world [57], China has not yet established a service system specifically for dementia. Early detection of cognitive impairment is not possible due to low public awareness of dementia and the lack of routine screening mechanisms in most medical facilities. Many people with dementia rely on home care, which is increasingly being incorporated into long-term care. However, the lack of caregivers with spiritual and professional background makes it difficult to improve the quality of life of these elderly [58]. Therefore, the following steps should focus on increasing public awareness of dementia, earlier identification and prevention of cognitive impairment, and the establishment of a joint disability service system for dementia.

Statistically significant differences in disability were observed between genders, and the older women were more prone to experience functional impairment. However, after adjusting for other variables, the incidence of disability became similar between genders following adjustment of other variables, which might be explained by higher rates of chronic diseases such as osteoarthritis, dementia, falls, and mental disorder in women [59], as well as differences in body composition and life expectancy gaps [60]. For social factors, the analysis showed that older adults who live in urban areas and have formal education are better able to maintain their abilities, as has been well documented in many studies. This may be because they have access to health knowledge and resources from a variety of sources [61] as well as a range of social and recreational activities, which can help them maintain good mental health [62]. Despite China's increasing spending on healthcare and health, inefficiencies and uneven distribution of resources persist. Because of the differences in economics, healthcare, urbanization, and population density between the east and west, it is difficult to see a boom in care services and elderly care in the rural west anytime soon [63]. This study will offer policy implications and help local elder population to improve the quality of life.

This study has several strengths. First, this large sample study can provide high-quality and rich information for existing disability research, and the findings are important for follow-up studies and the global literature on the disability process and its associated factors. Second, comprehensive training of professional bodies and various quality control measures yielded reliable data. Finally, the study results provide a scientific basis for government policies and resource allocation to enable local older adults to have a higher quality of life and gradually achieve healthy aging. Several limitations should be taken into account when interpreting this study. As this study is a cross-sectional study, the results failed to determine a causal relationship between influencing factors and disability. Therefore, although many factors influencing disability were identified in this study, it cannot be denied that disability may also influence related factors to some extent. Further cohort studies are needed to determine the causal relationships. Some of the data on health characteristics and ADL items were self-reported, and biases in recall and reporting may have affected the information. Future studies should add more objective indicators and try to assess disability in multiple dimensions, rather than just selecting ADL as the only criterion for determining disability. This study served as a baseline investigation for our project, and more follow-up and exploration of interventions are needed in the future.

Conclusions

A higher prevalence of disability was found among urban and rural older adults in Sichuan, where disability was strongly associated with aging, lower education levels, living in rural areas, hospitalization, co-morbidities, self-rated poor health, falls, cognitive impairment, psychological problems, and changes in social networks. The findings underscore the need for early screening for disability, effective prevention policies, smaller urban–rural disparities, and age-friendly society.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to this is a newly database which are confidential and the authors do not have permission to share data. But this dataset is also available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ADL:

Activities of Daily Living

WHO:

The World Health Organization

EDC:

Electronic Data Capture

BI:

The Barthel Index

MCI:

Mild cognitive impairment

GAD-2:

The 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale

PHQ-2:

The 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire depression module

LSNS-6:

The abbreviated Lubben Social Network Scale

SD:

Standard deviation

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. Nagi SZ. A study in the evaluation of disability and rehabilitation potential: concepts, methods, and procedures. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1964;54(9):1568–79. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.54.9.1568.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. ICF Beginner's Guide: Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/icf-beginner-s-guide-towards-a-common-language-for-functioning-disability-and-health. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

  3. Freiberger E, de Vreede P, Schoene D, Rydwik E, Mueller V, Frändin K, Hopman-Rock M. Performance-based physical function in older community-dwelling persons: a systematic review of instruments. Age Ageing. 2012;41(6):712–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afs099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Devi J. The scales of functional assessment of Activities of Daily Living in geriatrics. Age and Ageing 2018, 47(4):500–502; doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy050 %J Age and Ageing.

  5. Chauhan S, Kumar S, Bharti R, Patel R. Prevalence and determinants of activity of daily living and instrumental activity of daily living among elderly in India. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02659-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fong JH. Disability incidence and functional decline among older adults with major chronic diseases. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):323. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1348-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hartigan I. A comparative review of the Katz ADL and the Barthel Index in assessing the activities of daily living of older people. Int J Older People Nurs. 2007;2(3):204–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-3743.2007.00074.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang M, Ding X, Dong B. The measurement of disability in the elderly: a systematic review of self-reported questionnaires. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(2):150.e151-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gresham GE, Phillips TF, Labi ML. ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980;61(8):355–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jang Y, Powers D, Park N, Chiriboga D, Chi I, Lubben JJTG. Performance of an Abbreviated Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6) among Three Ethnic Groups of Older Asian Americans. 2020; doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa156.

  11. Zeng Y, Feng Q, Hesketh T, Christensen K, Vaupel JW. Survival, disabilities in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: a cohort study. Lancet (London, England). 2017;389(10079):1619–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30548-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Partridge L, Deelen J, Slagboom PE. Facing up to the global challenges of ageing. Nature. 2018;561(7721):45–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0457-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. The Fourth Sampling Survey on the Living Conditions of the Elderly in Urban and Rural Areas. http://www.cncaprc.gov.cn/. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.

  14. Stuck AE, Walthert JM, Nikolaus T, Büla CJ, Hohmann C, Beck JC. Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review. Social science & medicine (1982) 1999, 48(4):445–469; doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00370-0.

  15. Landös A, von Arx M, et al. Childhood socioeconomic circumstances and disability trajectories in older men and women: a European cohort study. Eur J Pub Health. 2019;29(1):50–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chou CY, Chiu CJ, Chang CM, Wu CH, Lu FH, Wu JS, Yang YC. Disease-related disability burden: a comparison of seven chronic conditions in middle-aged and older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02137-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Covinsky KE, Palmer RM, Fortinsky RH, Counsell SR, Stewart AL, Kresevic D, Burant CJ, Landefeld CS. Loss of independence in activities of daily living in older adults hospitalized with medical illnesses: increased vulnerability with age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(4):451–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51152.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu H, Wang M. Socioeconomic status and ADL disability of the older adults: Cumulative health effects, social outcomes and impact mechanisms. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(2): e0262808. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262808.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jia Y, Ting Z, Birong D, Ming Y. Disability in older adults: a review of current research. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics. 2016;35(12):1355–8. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2016.12.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hou C, Ma Y et al. Disability Transitions and Health Expectancies among Elderly People Aged 65 Years and Over in China: A Nationwide Longitudinal Study. 2019, 10(6):1246–1257; doi:https://doi.org/10.14336/ad.2019.0121.

  21. Chen W, Fang Y, Mao F, Hao S, Chen J, Yuan M, Han Y, Hong YA. Assessment of Disability among the Elderly in Xiamen of China: A Representative Sample Survey of 14,292 Older Adults. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6): e0131014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131014.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu R, Zhou X, Cao S, Huang B, Wu C, Zhou X, Lu Y. Health Status of the Elderly and Its Influence on Their Activities of Daily Living in Shangrao, Jiangxi Province. International journal of environmental research and public health 2019, 16(10); doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101771.

  23. Jin X, Liu Y, Hu Z, Du W. Vulnerable Older Adults' Identification, Geographic Distribution, and Policy Implications in China. International journal of environmental research and public health 2021, 18(20); doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010642.

  24. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61–3. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288809164103.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, Vitaliano P, Dokmak A. The mini-cog: a cognitive “vital signs” measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15(11):1021–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:11%3c1021::aid-gps234%3e3.0.co;2-6.

  27. Skapinakis P. The 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale had high sensitivity and specificity for detecting GAD in primary care. Evid Based Med. 2007;12(5):149. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm.12.5.149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003;41(11):1284–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Mlr.0000093487.78664.3c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jang Y, Powers DA, Park NS, Chiriboga DA, Chi I, Lubben J. Performance of an Abbreviated Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6) among Three Ethnic Groups of Older Asian Americans. Gerontologist. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kurimoto A, Awata S, Ohkubo T, Tsubota-Utsugi M, Asayama K, Takahashi K, Suenaga K, Satoh H. Imai YJNRIzJjog. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the abbreviated Lubben Social Network Scale. 2011;48(2):149–57. https://doi.org/10.3143/geriatrics.48.149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Petersen MR, Deddens JA. A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen W, Qian L, Shi J, Franklin M. Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspecification. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0519-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Chandra A, Crane SJ, Tung EE, Hanson GJ, North F, Cha SS, Takahashi PY. Patient-reported geriatric symptoms as risk factors for hospitalization and emergency department visits. Aging Dis. 2015;6(3):188–95. https://doi.org/10.14336/ad.2014.0706.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu H,Jiao J, et al. Potential associated factors of functional disability in Chinese older inpatients: a multicenter cross-sectional study. 2020;20(1):319. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01738-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Stuck AE, Walthert JM, Nikolaus T, Büla CJ, Hohmann C, Beck JC. Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(4):445–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00370-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wrzus C, Hänel M, Wagner J. Neyer FJPb. Social network changes and life events across the life span: a meta-analysis. 2013;139(1):53–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. WHO. World Report on Disability 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

  38. Ćwirlej-Sozańska A, Wiśniowska-Szurlej A, Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska A. Sozański BJBg. Determinants of ADL and IADL disability in older adults in southeastern Poland. 2019;19(1):297. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1319-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yu R,Wong M, et al. Trends in activities of daily living disability in a large sample of community-dwelling Chinese older adults in Hong Kong: an age-period-cohort analysis. 2016;6(12): e013259. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Andrew MK, Keefe JM. Social vulnerability from a social ecology perspective: a cohort study of older adults from the National Population Health Survey of Canada. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:90. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Granacher U, Gollhofer A, Hortobágyi T, Kressig R. Muehlbauer TJSm. The importance of trunk muscle strength for balance, functional performance, and fall prevention in seniors: a systematic review. 2013;43(7):627–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0041-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araújo J, Branco J, Santos R, Ramos EJO. cartilage. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. 2011;19(11):1270–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2011.08.009.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Garcia I, Tiuganji C, Simões M. Lunardi AJIjocopd. Activities of Daily Living and Life-Space Mobility in Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2020;15:69–77. https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.S230063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim A, Ko HJJocm. Lower Limb Function in Elderly Korean Adults Is Related to Cognitive Function. 2018, 7(5); doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7050099.

  45. Covinsky K, Pierluissi E, Johnston CJJ. Hospitalization-associated disability: "She was probably able to ambulate, but I'm not sure". 2011, 306(16):1782–1793; doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1556.

  46. Pahor M, Guralnik J, et al. Effect of structured physical activity on prevention of major mobility disability in older adults: the LIFE study randomized clinical trial. 2014;311(23):2387–96. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.5616.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang Y, Yu XJIjoer, health p. Evaluation of Long-Term Care Insurance Policy in Chinese Pilot Cities. 2019, 16(20); doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203826.

  48. Quail J, Addona V, Wolfson C, Podoba J, Lévesque L, Dupuis JJEjoa. Association of unmet need with self-rated health in a community dwelling cohort of disabled seniors 75 years of age and over. 2007, 4(1):45–55; doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-007-0042-8.

  49. Hu H, Si Y, Li BJIjoer, health p. Decomposing Inequality in Long-Term Care Need Among Older Adults with Chronic Diseases in China: A Life Course Perspective. 2020, 17(7); doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072559.

  50. Taş U, Steyerberg E, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Hofman A, Koes B. Verhagen AJBg. Age, gender and disability predict future disability in older people: the Rotterdam Study. 2011;11:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-11-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hur K, Choi J, Zheng M, Shen J. Wrobel BJLio. Association of alterations in smell and taste with depression in older adults. 2018;3(2):94–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang H, Jiang Y, Rao W, Zhang Q, Qin M, Ng C, Ungvari G. Xiang YJFip. Prevalence of Depression Among Empty-Nest Elderly in China: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. 2020;11:608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Santini Z, Jose P, York Cornwell E, Koyanagi A, Nielsen L, Hinrichsen C, Meilstrup C, Madsen K, Koushede VJTLPh. Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and symptoms of depression and anxiety among older Americans (NSHAP): a longitudinal mediation analysis. 2020, 5(1):e62-e70; doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30230-0.

  54. Hanna F, Barbui C, Dua T, Lora A, van Regteren Altena M, Saxena SJWpojotWPA. Global mental health: how are we doing? 2018, 17(3):367–368; doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20572.

  55. Liang D, Mays V. Hwang WJHp, planning. Integrated mental health services in China: challenges and planning for the future. 2018;33(1):107–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sauvaget C, Yamada M, Fujiwara S, Sasaki H, Mimori YJG. Dementia as a predictor of functional disability: a four-year follow-up study. 2002;48(4):226–33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000058355.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Jia L, Du Y, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet Public health. 2020;5(12):e661–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30185-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Chen Z, Yang X, Song Y, Song B, Zhang Y, Liu J, Wang Q, Yu J. Challenges of Dementia Care in China. Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) 2017, 2(1); doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics2010007.

  59. Hubbard R, Rockwood KJM. Frailty in older women. 2011;69(3):203–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Hirokawa K, Utsuyama M, Hayashi Y, Kitagawa M, Makinodan T. Fulop TJI, I a. Slower immune system aging in women versus men in the Japanese population. 2013;10(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4933-10-19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang X, Dupre M, Qiu L, Zhou W, Zhao Y. Gu DJBg. Urban-rural differences in the association between access to healthcare and health outcomes among older adults in China. 2017;17(1):151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0538-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sun J. Lyu SJJoad. Social participation and urban-rural disparity in mental health among older adults in China. 2020;274:399–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Yi M, Peng J, Zhang L, Zhang YJIjfeih. Is the allocation of medical and health resources effective? Characteristic facts from regional heterogeneity in China. 2020, 19(1):89; doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01201-8.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all teamworkers and interviewers for their great work.

Funding

This work was supported by the Health Commission of Sichuan Province, the National Key R&D Program of China [grant numbers 2018YFC2002400], 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence (West China Hospital,Sichuan University) [grant numbers ZYGD20010], Study on the Long-term Care insurance status in Chengdu and the evaluation of policy effect [grant numbers ZX2020002], Sichuan Science and Technology Program [grant numbers 2020YFS0319], and Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau Major Science and Technology Application Demonstration Project [grant numbers 2019YF0900083SN].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RQ contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing original draft, review and editing of the paper. SJ contributed to data curation, validation, review and editing of the paper. WZ contributed to methodology, review and editing of the paper. XX contributed to data curation, formal analysis, visualization of the paper. QS contributed to the revision of the paper. LH contributed to methodology, supervision of the paper. DL contributed to supervision, project administration of the paper. FH contributed to investigation, data curation of the paper. BD contributed to conceptualization, methodology, funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, review and editing of the paper. All authors saw and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birong Dong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research, West China Hospital of Sichuan University (approval No. 2020 Trial (222)). All participants were asked about their willingness to take part in the study and signed informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiao, R., Jia, S., Zhao, W. et al. Prevalence and correlates of disability among urban–rural older adults in Southwest China: a large, population-based study. BMC Geriatr 22, 517 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03193-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03193-2

Keywords

  • disability
  • Older adults
  • Urban–rural
  • ADL
  • Barthel index
  • Correlates