Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and delirium in older hospitalized patients: a cohort study

BMC Geriatrics volume 22, Article number: 277 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

It remains unclear whether stress hyperglycemia is associated with delirium. We performed this cohort study to determine the association between stress hyperglycemia and delirium.

Methods

We consecutively enrolled patients aged ≥70 years who were admitted to the Geriatric Department of West China Hospital between March 2016 and July 2017. Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) was calculated as fasting blood glucose divided by estimated average glucose derived from glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and was classified into three tertiles. Delirium was screened within 24 h of admission and three times daily thereafter, using the confusion assessment method. The Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of SHR with delirium.

Results

Among 487 included patients (mean age 83.0 years, 72.0% male), 50 (10.3%) patients experienced delirium during hospitalization. Compared to the second tertile, both the lowest and the highest SHR tertiles were independently associated with delirium (hazard ratio [HR] 3.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-9.51; and HR 2.97, 95% CI 1.29-6.81, respectively). Similar results were found after further adjusting for statin comedication. Multiple-adjusted restricted cubic splines revealed a nonlinear relationship between SHR and delirium (Pnonlinearity=0.04). Adding SHR to conventional risk factors improved the risk prediction of delirium (net reclassification index 0.39, P=0.01; integrated discrimination improvement 0.07, P=0.03). Subgroup analyses indicated that the relationship between SHR and delirium was more apparent in patients with HbA1c <6.5%, with significantly higher HR in the first (3.65, 95% CI 1.11-11.97) and third (3.13, 95% CI 1.13-8.72) SHR tertiles compared to the second tertile, while there was no significant association between SHR and delirium in those with HbA1c ≥6.5%.

Conclusions

Both lower and higher SHR were associated with increased risk of delirium but only in patients with HbA1c <6.5%. Admission SHR may serve as a promising predictor of delirium, and incorporating this biomarker into prediction algorithms might have potential clinical utility in aiding delirium risk stratification, especially in those with HbA1c <6.5%.

Peer Review reports

Background

Delirium, an acute neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by fluctuating disturbance in attention and cognition, is a common complication in elderly hospitalized patients [1, 2]. It affects up to 50% of those older than 65 years [2] and is associated with multiple adverse outcomes, including prolonged hospitalization, functional disability, long-term cognitive impairment, and increased mortality [2,3,4,5]. Although several risk factors have been identified (such as advanced age, comorbidity burden, and preexisting cognitive decline), the underlying pathophysiology of delirium remains poorly understood [1]. Therefore, it is necessary to explore and identify biomarkers associated with delirium, which may not only advance our understanding of delirium but also help clinicians evaluate delirium risk more accurately and design interventions accordingly to prevent the condition and improve the outcomes.

Stress hyperglycemia is prevalent among patients with acute illness and generally refers to the transient increase in blood glucose as a result of inflammation and neuroendocrine derangements during illness [6]. It has been reported that stress hyperglycemia is associated with poor prognosis in hospitalized patients [7,8,9,10,11]. However, few studies have previously examined the role of stress hyperglycemia in delirium. As elevated glucose levels can induce oxidative stress, compromise the blood-brain barrier, and cause subsequent neuronal damage that may lead to delirium [12, 13], we postulated that stress hyperglycemia may be a potential risk factor for delirium. Unfortunately, in clinical practice, there is currently no consensus on the definition of stress hyperglycemia. Most previous studies relied on admission glucose concentration to identify stress hyperglycemia, which cannot truly reflect the acute glycemic increase in patients with poor diabetes control.

Recently, stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR), which combines admission glucose and the estimated average glucose derived from glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), was proposed as a novel indicator of stress hyperglycemia [14]. As HbA1c reflects the mean glucose status over the preceding 3 months [15, 16] and is not easily affected by the onset of acute illness [17], it can be speculated that SHR could quantify stress hyperglycemia more accurately by controlling for background glycemia. Growing studies have suggested that the prognostic value of SHR is superior to admission glycemia [14, 18, 19]. However, to date, no evidence exists on the relationship between SHR and delirium.

In the present study, we therefore aimed to explore the association between SHR and delirium in older hospitalized patients. We hypothesized that patients with higher SHR levels would be more likely to experience delirium.

Methods

Study population

This study was conducted in the Department of Geriatrics (across four floors), West China Hospital of Sichuan University, between March 2016 and July 2017. Each floor is equipped with an average of 65 beds and receives internal medical patients aged 60 years or older. Eligible patients were aged ≥70 years and had an anticipated length of hospital stay of at least 3 days. Exclusion criteria included delirium on admission, inability to communicate due to severe deafness or severe dementia, a documented history of psychiatric illness, terminal conditions with a life expectancy of less than 6 months, and incomplete data. The study was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and conformed to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data collection

The following baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected by trained research nurses within 24 hours after admission: age, sex, body mass index, education levels, marriage status, smoking, alcohol consumption, type of admission, and history of diabetes mellitus. Baseline functional status was assessed by the Barthel Index for activities of daily living (ADL) [20]. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), and errors ≥3 were defined as cognitive impairment [21]. The severity of comorbidities was measured with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) [22]. Visual acuity and hearing ability were evaluated using the Snellen eye chart and the whispered voice test, respectively. The severity of pain was measured by Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale, and a score ≥2 was defined as having pain [23]. Laboratory tests (routine blood tests, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and albumin) were conducted within 24 hours of admission.

Assessment of stress hyperglycemia ratio

Venous blood samples were collected from all patients after an overnight fast within the first two days after admission. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) was measured using the hexokinase method (Cobas 8000, ROCHE, Germany), while HbA1c was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (Tosoh G8). All measurements were performed by laboratory personnel blinded to patients’ clinical characteristics and outcomes. Hypoglycemia was defined as FBG <3.9 mmol/L [24, 25], and hyperglycemia as FBG >7.8 mmol/L [26]. And HbA1c ≥6.5% designated the presence of background hyperglycemia.

HbA1c was used to estimate the average blood glucose before admission using the following formula: estimated average glucose (mmol/L) = (1.59 × HbA1c) - 2.59 [16]. Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) was then calculated as the ratio of FBG to the estimated average glucose, which quantified the extent of acute elevation in blood glucose compared with the background glucose status.

Outcome assessment

The main outcome measure was the development of delirium during hospitalization. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), which is a widely used, standardized diagnostic tool for delirium with high sensitivity (94% to 100%), specificity (90% to 95%), and interrater reliability (0.70 to 1.00) [27]. The CAM diagnostic algorithm requires the presence of acute onset or fluctuating course, inattention, and either disorganized thinking or an altered level of consciousness to fulfill the criteria for delirium.

Research nurses were trained ahead in screening delirium to ensure high interrater and intrarater reliability (kappa ≥0.9). Then, all patients were screened for delirium by well-trained nurses within 24 h after admission and three times daily thereafter until discharge or for a maximum of 13 days. In addition, to minimize error and maximize reliability, experienced clinical researchers further independently assessed patients every 48 h. In case of any doubt, an expert panel was consulted to screen patients according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria [28].

Statistical analysis

Continuous data were reported as mean with standard deviation (SD) or median with interquartile range (IQR), while categorical data were expressed as numbers and percentages. Since there are no established thresholds for SHR and given the sample size included in this study, we divided participants into three groups according to SHR tertiles. Differences among tertiles were compared using one-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.

We calculated the incidence rate of delirium by SHR tertiles. Subsequently, multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to explore the association between SHR and delirium. SHR was first included in the Cox models as a continuous variable (per 0.1 increase) and then was entered as a categorical variable (tertile groups). The tertile with the lowest delirium incidence was defined as the reference group. We performed 3 models: model 1 adjusted for age and sex; model 2 included the same variables in model 1 as well as potential delirium risk factors with P<0.10 identified in the univariate analysis; and model 3 further adjusted for statin comedication after admission since previous studies have shown that statins may affect the development of delirium [29]. In addition, the restricted cubic spline was performed to evaluate the pattern and magnitude of the associations between SHR and delirium, with four knots (at the 5th, 35th, 65th, 95th percentiles) [30]. Furthermore, C statistics, net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were calculated to evaluate the incremental predictive value of SHR beyond conventional risk factors.

As premorbid glycemia status might affect the relationship between blood glucose and outcomes [31, 32], subgroup analysis was conducted to test whether the association of SHR with delirium differs between patients with and without background hyperglycemia. In addition, some factors (i.e., age [33], infection [7], chronic kidney impairment [34], anemia [16], etc.) might influence the development of hyperglycemia or the values of HbA1c, which may potentially bias the link between SHR and delirium. Thus, additional stratified analyses were further used to assess the potential effect modification by these variables. Interactions between SHR levels and stratified factors were examined using the likelihood ratio test.

All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 15.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) and R version 3.4.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Two-sided values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

During the study period, there were 1202 patients admitted to our hospital, and 715 patients were excluded (Fig. 1). Therefore, a total of 487 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 83.0 ± 5.9 years, and 351 (72.0%) were male. The median value of SHR was 0.81 (IQR 0.72-0.96). All patients were divided into three groups based on SHR tertiles (tertile 1, <0.753; tertile 2, 0.753-0.895; and tertile 3 >0.895). Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of patients by SHR tertiles. Patients in the highest tertile were more likely to have cognitive impairment and infection, had higher levels of blood glucose, white blood cells, blood urea nitrogen and creatinine, had lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and lower ADL scores (all P<0.05, Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of participants’ selection. HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin

Full size image
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients by tertiles of stress hyperglycemia ratio
Full size table

Association between SHR and delirium

Fifty (10.3%) patients experienced delirium during hospitalization, and the median time from admission to delirium occurrence was 3 days (IQR, 3-7 days). The second SHR tertile had the lowest delirium incidence (tertile 1 vs. tertile 2 vs. tertile 3, 8.6% vs. 4.9% vs. 17.2%, P=0.001, Table 2). The overall incidence rate of delirium was 9.1 per 1000 person-days. For SHR tertiles, the incidence rate of delirium was 7.7, 4.2, and 16.1 per 1000 person-days for patients in tertile 1, tertile 2, and tertile 3, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2 The overall incidence rate of delirium and incidence rate by SHR tertiles
Full size table

The results of the univariate analysis are presented in the Additional file 1 (Table A1). The SHR level was significantly higher in patients with delirium (median value, 0.91 vs. 0.80, P=0.03). Besides, patients with delirium were older, more likely to be smokers, had higher proportion of vision, hearing, and cognitive impairment, had higher white blood cell counts, lower albumin levels, higher comorbidity burden, lower ADL scores, and lower proportion of statin treatment than those without delirium (all P<0.05, Table A1).

In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for potential confounders, we found that patients in the lowest and highest tertiles had a significantly higher risk of delirium than those in the second SHR tertile (model 2: HR 3.71, 95% CI 1.45-9.51; and HR 2.97, 95% CI 1.29-6.81, respectively). In the sensitivity analysis further adjusted for statin treatment, similar results were observed (model 3, Table 3). The multiple-adjusted spline regression model revealed a nonlinear association between SHR levels and delirium (P for nonlinearity=0.04, Fig. 2).

Table 3 Multivariate analyses between SHR and delirium
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Multiple spline regression analyses to examine the relationship between SHR and delirium. The solid line represents hazard ratios and the dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals. Reference is the 35th percentile of SHR (0.76). Hazard ratios for delirium were adjusted for the same variables as model 2 in Table 3. The lowest 5% and highest 5% of patients were not shown in the figure due to small sample sizes

Full size image

Incremental predictive value of SHR

The performance of models with SHR to predict delirium is shown in Table 4. Adding SHR to the conventional model did not significantly improve discriminatory power but did significantly improve risk reclassification, as observed by the continuous NRI of 0.39 (95% CI 0.09-0.56) and IDI of 0.07 (95% CI 0.01-0.14).

Table 4 Reclassification and discrimination statistics for risk of delirium by SHR
Full size table

Subgroup analyses

The characteristics of patients with HbA1c ≥6.5% vs. HbA1c <6.5% are detailed in the Additional file 1 (Table A2). In patients with HbA1c ≥6.5%, there was no significant association between SHR and delirium, regardless of whether SHR was a continuous or categorical variable (all P>0.05). In contrast, in the subgroup of HbA1c <6.5%, patients with delirium had significantly higher SHR levels than those without delirium (median value, 0.92 vs. 0.80, P=0.04, Table A2). After adjustment for covariates in model 2, we found that the first and third SHR tertiles in patients with HbA1c <6.5% were independently related to delirium, and the adjusted HR was 3.65 for the first vs. the second tertile (95% CI 1.11-11.97) and 3.13 for the third vs. the second tertile (95% CI 1.13-8.72, Table 3). A similar tendency of association between SHR and delirium was observed after further adjusting for statin in model 3 (Table 3).

Additional stratified analyses showed that the relationship between SHR and delirium was not changed by age, sex, emergency admission, previous diabetes, infection, pain, renal dysfunction, anemia, cognitive impairment, or comorbidity burden (all P-interaction >0.05, Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Stratified analyses to identify variables that may modify the association between SHR and delirium. Hazard ratios were adjusted for the same variables as model 2 in Table 3, except for the stratified variable. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we found that both lower and higher SHRs were significantly associated with an increased risk of delirium in older hospitalized patients. Subgroup analyses indicated that the associations of SHR with delirium were more apparent in patients with HbA1c <6.5%. The inclusion of SHR to conventional risk factors improved risk prediction for delirium. These results highlight the need to consider admission SHR when evaluating delirium risk, especially in those with HbA1c <6.5%.

Although we used the well-validated assessment tool to diagnose delirium and the assessors were heavily trained to accurately apply the assessment tool before the study, the incidence of delirium in our study was lower (10.3%). And a recent meta-analysis of older medical inpatients reported that delirium was present in up to 23% [35]. Compared to those previous studies mostly conducted in Western European medical populations [35], our population might be healthier and less impaired than similar internal medicine populations in Western European countries, as indicated by lower comorbidities burden, better functional status and cognitive function. Also of note, the culture difference might play a role as older adults in China have close relationships with their family members, who are often involved in their care and may exert positive effects in reducing delirium risk [36]. These might help explain the relatively lower incidence of delirium in this study.

Glucose dysregulation has been identified as a risk factor for delirium [2, 37], but few studies have investigated the link between stress hyperglycemia and delirium. Recent studies on surgical patients reported that perioperative stress-induced hyperglycemia was positively related to postoperative delirium [38,39,40], which was partly in line with our results. However, most of the aforementioned studies utilized absolute glycemia (i.e., random or fasting glucose) to diagnose stress hyperglycemia without considering the background glucose. In clinical practice, hyperglycemia in a hospitalized patient may result not only from acute stress but also from chronic poor control of diabetes [14]. Unlike previous studies that relied mainly on absolute hyperglycemia, we chose an easily available indicator of relative hyperglycemia, measured as SHR, to assess the glycemic fluctuations during acute stress. By combining the acute and premorbid glycemia levels, SHR could identify and quantify stress hyperglycemia more accurately. Increasing evidence has shown that SHR is associated with unfavorable outcomes in various diseases [14, 18, 19, 41]. However, whether SHR is related to delirium remains unclear. Our study added evidence on the association between SHR and delirium, suggesting that SHR may provide important predictive information for delirium.

Contrary to our original hypothesis, we found that the relationship between SHR and delirium was nonlinear, and the second SHR tertile had the lowest delirium incidence, which might be attributed to the potential protective effect of stress hyperglycemia. Stress hyperglycemia has been suggested as a survival response that provides the brain with essential fuel at the time of stress [7]. Mild-to-moderate stress hyperglycemia may protect against pathological insults by reducing apoptosis, favoring angiogenesis, and increasing plasticity [7]. In contrast, attempts to interfere with this response may contribute to brain energy crisis [42]. Multiple studies have indicated that even mild hypoglycemia can cause alterations in brain function and neurocognitive performance [43, 44]. In our study, we noted that the first SHR tertile had a significantly lower glycemic level than the other two tertiles (Table 1). Further analysis found that the prevalence of hypoglycemia (<3.9 mmol/L) was highest in the first tertile (tertile 1 vs. tertile 2 vs. tertile 3, 4.9% vs. 0.0% vs. 0.0%, P<0.001), in which delirium incidence was higher. However, hypoglycemia may account only partially for the high delirium rate in the first SHR tertile, since 95% of delirium patients did not have hypoglycemia. It might be possible that some hypoglycemic episodes were not recorded, as glucose was only measured once. Therefore, the contribution of hypoglycemia to delirium may be underestimated and needs further research using continuous glucose monitoring.

Stress hyperglycemia is caused by inflammatory and neurohormonal derangements that occur during acute illness [6, 7]. Thus, a higher SHR may reflect more severe baseline inflammation and neuroendocrine response, both of which are reported to be involved in the development of delirium [2, 45]. Besides, stress hyperglycemia may directly contribute to negative outcomes by inducing oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction [6]. Several studies have found that increased glucose concentrations can promote the release of proinflammatory cytokines, damage the blood-brain barrier, and induce neuroinflammation [12, 13], which may ultimately cause disturbances in the neuronal network and resultant delirium [46]. Our results concerning the relationship between higher SHR and delirium might be supported by these findings.

It is worth noting that stress hyperglycemia usually occurs in the first few days after insult and may resolve spontaneously as acute illness or stress dissipates [6], which may potentially affect the association between SHR and delirium. The timing, severity, and duration of stress hyperglycemia may vary with patients’ glucose tolerance, type and severity of disease, and stage of illness [6]. Although delirium in this study occurred relatively early (median time 3 days, IQR 3-7 days), neither the severity and stage of patients’ acute disease nor the inflammatory cytokines and neurohormones (such as catecholamines and cortisol) that can reflect the degree of stress was dynamically assessed. At the same time, blood glucose was measured only on admission without continuous monitoring, and the temporal profile of stress hyperglycemia (or SHR variability) was unclear. Whether SHR variability affects the development of delirium remains unknown and requires further investigation.

Premorbid glycemia status can modify the correlation between admission glucose and patient prognosis [31, 32], so it seems necessary to conduct a subgroup analysis based on background hyperglycemia. In our study, although no significant interaction was observed between SHR and background hyperglycemia (P=0.28), we found that the first and third SHR tertiles were associated with delirium, yet only in patients with HbA1c <6.5% (Table 3). This may be explained by the findings that patients with premorbid hyperglycemia tolerated high-range fluctuations in glucose levels better than those without premorbid hyperglycemia [47,48,49]. In addition, chronic premorbid hyperglycemia can result in cellular conditioning that might exert a protective effect against the adverse consequences of stress hyperglycemia [6, 50]. For example, acute stress may induce the expression of glucose transporters (GLUTs) in cell membranes, causing uncontrolled entry of glucose into cells and resulting in glucose toxicity [6]. However, chronic exposure to hyperglycemia preferentially downregulates GLUT-1 and GLUT-3, which may protect against glucose influx during acute stress [6, 50]. Moreover, cellular adaptation to chronic hyperglycemia might be protective by reducing the production of superoxide [51]. Nevertheless, we found that the median SHR level in patients with HbA1c ≥6.5% and < 6.5% were almost the same and also the incidence rates of delirium in the tertiles (Table A2). The lack of relationship between SHR and delirium in those with HbA1c ≥6.5% may be an artifact of the small sample size since only 19 patients experienced delirium in this subgroup, which may limit the statistical power and raise the chance of false negatives [52]. Future studies with a larger sample size are required to validate our results.

The strengths of this study include that we used a simple, easily accessible indicator and identified its potential clinical usefulness in predicting delirium, especially in those with HbA1c <6.5%. Since glucose and HbA1c tests are widely available, SHR can easily be calculated in a busy clinical setting without needing complicated formulas and additional costs. However, this study has some limitations. First, it was a single-center observational study, and therefore, conclusions about causality cannot be drawn. Second, potential selection bias may be introduced, as patients without HbA1c values were excluded. Third, the severity or stage of patients’ acute illness and some therapeutic interventions (such as corticosteroids, parental and enteral nutrition) that may influence the development of hyperglycemia [6] were not collected, which may potentially bias the relationship between SHR and delirium. Fourth, SHR was not dynamically measured, and the impact of SHR variability on delirium remains undefined. Finally, we did not collect sufficient data on treatment options because treatment varied widely from patient to patient due to different comorbidities. As many variables associated with delirium were not available in this study, residual confounding cannot be excluded. Hence, SHR may be a surrogate for other factors not studied. Future larger prospective multicenter studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Conclusions

Both lower and higher SHR were associated with an increased risk of delirium in older hospitalized patients. SHR may serve as a promising marker to identify patients with a higher risk of delirium. Incorporating measures of SHR might have the potential clinical utility to aid delirium risk stratification. Further preclinical and clinical studies are needed to verify our results and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying SHR and delirium.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available as individual privacy could be compromised but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SHR:

Stress hyperglycemia ratio

FBG:

Fasting blood glucose

HbA1c:

Glycosylated hemoglobin

HR:

Hazard ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

ADL:

Activities of daily living

SPMSQ:

The Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire

CCI:

The Charlson Comorbidity Index

CAM:

Confusion assessment method

SD:

Standard deviation

IQR:

Interquartile range

NRI:

Net reclassification index

IDI:

Integrated discrimination improvement

GLUT:

Glucose transporter

References

  1. Oh ES, Fong TG, Hshieh TT, Inouye SK. Delirium in older persons: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA. 2017;318:1161–74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Inouye SK, Westendorp RG, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014;383:911–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marcantonio ER. Delirium in hospitalized older adults. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1456–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fong TG, Jones RN, Shi P, Marcantonio ER, Yap L, Rudolph JL, et al. Delirium accelerates cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2009;72:1570–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg TE, Chen C, Wang Y, Jung E, Swanson A, Ing C, et al. Association of delirium with long-term cognitive decline: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(11):1373–81. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dungan KM, Braithwaite SS, Preiser JC. Stress hyperglycaemia. Lancet. 2009;373:1798–807.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Marik PE, Bellomo R. Stress hyperglycemia: an essential survival response! Crit Care. 2013;17:305.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang L, Wang Z, Xu F, Han D, Li S, Yin H, et al. Effects of stress hyperglycemia on short-term prognosis of patients without diabetes mellitus in coronary care unit. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:683932.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Khalfallah M, Abdelmageed R, Elgendy E, Hafez YM. Incidence, predictors and outcomes of stress hyperglycemia in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2020;17:1479164119883983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo Y, Wang G, Jing J, Wang A, Zhang X, Meng X, et al. Stress hyperglycemia may have higher risk of stroke recurrence than previously diagnosed diabetes mellitus. Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13:9108–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baker EH, Janaway CH, Philips BJ, Brennan AL, Baines DL, Wood DM, et al. Hyperglycaemia is associated with poor outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2006;61:284–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rom S, Zuluaga-Ramirez V, Gajghate S, Seliga A, Winfield M, Heldt NA, et al. Hyperglycemia-driven neuroinflammation compromises BBB leading to memory loss in both Diabetes Mellitus (DM) type 1 and type 2 mouse models. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56:1883–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arcambal A, Taile J, Rondeau P, Viranaicken W, Meilhac O, Gonthier MP. Hyperglycemia modulates redox, inflammatory and vasoactive markers through specific signaling pathways in cerebral endothelial cells: Insights on insulin protective action. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019;130:59–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts GW, Quinn SJ, Valentine N, Alhawassi T, O’Dea H, Stranks SN, et al. Relative Hyperglycemia, a Marker of Critical Illness: Introducing the Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:4490–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nathan DM, Turgeon H, Regan S. Relationship between glycated haemoglobin levels and mean glucose levels over time. Diabetologia. 2007;50:2239–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, Zheng H, Schoenfeld D, Heine RJ, et al. Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:1473–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Luethi N, Cioccari L, Tanaka A, Kar P, Giersch E, Deane AM, et al. Glycated hemoglobin A1c levels are not affected by critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1692–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee TF, Drake SM, Roberts GW, Bersten A, Stranks SN, Heilbronn LK, et al. Relative hyperglycemia is an independent determinant of in-hospital mortality in patients with critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2020;48:e115–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chu J, Tang J, Lai Y, Gao Y, Ye Z, Guan C, et al. Association of stress hyperglycemia ratio with intracoronary thrombus burden in diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12:6598–608.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:703–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975;23:433–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Garra G, Singer AJ, Taira BR, Chohan J, Cardoz H, Chisena E, et al. Validation of the Wong-baker faces pain rating scale in pediatric emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:50–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Takeishi S, Mori A, Hachiya H, Yumura T, Ito S, Shibuya T, et al. Hypoglycemia and glycemic variability are associated with mortality in non-intensive care unit hospitalized infectious disease patients with diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2016;7:429–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chehregosha H, Khamseh ME, Malek M, Hosseinpanah F, Ismail-Beigi F. A view beyond HbA1c: role of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10:853–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Umpierrez GE, Hellman R, Korytkowski MT, Kosiborod M, Maynard GA, Montori VM, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients in non-critical care setting: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:16–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wei LA, Fearing MA, Sternberg EJ, Inouye SK. The Confusion Assessment Method: a systematic review of current usage. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:823–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Association AP. DSM-IV-TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mather JF, Corradi JP, Waszynski C, Noyes A, Duan Y, Grady J, et al. Statin and Its association with delirium in the medical ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:1515–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Durrleman S, Simon R. Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med. 1989;8:551–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Roquer J, Giralt-Steinhauer E, Cerda G, Rodriguez-Campello A, Cuadrado-Godia E, Jimenez-Conde J, et al. Glycated hemoglobin value combined with initial glucose levels for evaluating mortality risk in patients with ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;40:244–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Egi M, Bellomo R, Stachowski E, French CJ, Hart GK, Taori G, et al. The interaction of chronic and acute glycemia with mortality in critically ill patients with diabetes. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:105–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen K, Shen W, Gao Z, Luo C. Stress response capacity analysis during aging and possible new insights into aging studies. Curr Genet. 2021;67:417–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Radin MS. Pitfalls in hemoglobin A1c measurement: when results may be misleading. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:388–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gibb K, Seeley A, Quinn T, Siddiqi N, Shenkin S, Rockwood K, et al. The consistent burden in published estimates of delirium occurrence in medical inpatients over four decades: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Age Ageing. 2020;49:352–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang YY, Yue JR, Xie DM, Carter P, Li QL, Gartaganis SL, et al. Effect of the tailored, family-involved hospital elder life program on postoperative delirium and function in older adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:17–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. van Keulen K, Knol W, Belitser SV, van der Linden PD, Heerdink ER, Egberts TCG, et al. Diabetes and glucose dysregulation and transition to delirium in ICU patients. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:1444–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shirvani F, Sedighi M, Shahzamani M. Metabolic disturbance affects postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Neurol Sci. 2021;43(1):667–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05308-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Windmann V, Spies C, Knaak C, Wollersheim T, Piper SK, Vorderwulbecke G, et al. Intraoperative hyperglycemia increases the incidence of postoperative delirium. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85:1201–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hermanides J, Qeva E, Preckel B, Bilotta F. Perioperative hyperglycemia and neurocognitive outcome after surgery: a systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018;84:1178–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen X, Liu Z, Miao J, Zheng W, Yang Q, Ye X, et al. High stress hyperglycemia ratio predicts poor outcome after mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28:1668–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vespa P, McArthur DL, Stein N, Huang SC, Shao W, Filippou M, et al. Tight glycemic control increases metabolic distress in traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled within-subjects trial. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1923–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sejling AS, Kjaer TW, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Diemar SS, Frandsen CS, Hilsted L, et al. Hypoglycemia-associated changes in the electroencephalogram in patients with type 1 diabetes and normal hypoglycemia awareness or unawareness. Diabetes. 2015;64:1760–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schafer RJ, Page KA, Arora J, Sherwin R, Constable RT. BOLD response to semantic and syntactic processing during hypoglycemia is load-dependent. Brain Lang. 2012;120:1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Maldonado JR. Neuropathogenesis of delirium: review of current etiologic theories and common pathways. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;21:1190–222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Caplan GA, Kvelde T, Lai C, Yap SL, Lin C, Hill MA. Cerebrospinal fluid in long-lasting delirium compared with Alzheimer’s dementia. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65:1130–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chang MW, Huang CY, Liu HT, Chen YC, Hsieh CH. Stress-induced and diabetic hyperglycemia associated with higher mortality among intensive care unit trauma patients: cross-sectional analysis of the propensity score-matched population. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(5):992.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Krinsley JS, Meyfroidt G, van den Berghe G, Egi M, Bellomo R. The impact of premorbid diabetic status on the relationship between the three domains of glycemic control and mortality in critically ill patients. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2012;15:151–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Balintescu A, Martensson J. Hemoglobin A1c and permissive hyperglycemia in patients in the intensive care unit with diabetes. Crit Care Clin. 2019;35:289–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Aramendi I, Burghi G, Manzanares W. Dysglycemia in the critically ill patient: current evidence and future perspectives. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29:364–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Dugan LL, You YH, Ali SS, Diamond-Stanic M, Miyamoto S, DeCleves AE, et al. AMPK dysregulation promotes diabetes-related reduction of superoxide and mitochondrial function. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:4888–99.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Sedgwick P. Pitfalls of statistical hypothesis testing: type I and type II errors. BMJ. 2014;349:g4287.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Qiao He (Chinese Evidence‑Based Medicine Center and CREAT Group, West China Hospital of Sichuan University) for providing statistical consultation.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from Chinese National Science & Technology Pillar Program (2020YFC2005600), Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2019YFS0277), 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (ZYJC21005), 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence-Clinical Research Incubation Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (19HXFH012), and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Z20191003). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, data analyses, data interpretation, or writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Quhong Song and Miao Dai contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geriatrics and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China

    Quhong Song, Yanli Zhao, Taiping Lin, Li Huang & Jirong Yue

  2. Jiujiang First People’s Hospital, Jiujiang, China

    Miao Dai

Authors
  1. Quhong Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miao Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanli Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Taiping Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Li Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jirong Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JY and QS conceptualized and designed the study. JY obtained funding. QS, MD, YZ, TL, and LH collected and interpreted the data. QS and MD analyzed data, prepared and reviewed figures. QS wrote the original draft. JY provided critical revisions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jirong Yue.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (West China Hospital #201440), and conformed to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table A1. Univariate analysis to identify potential risk factors associated with delirium. Table A2. Comparison of clinical characteristics between delirium and non-delirium patients, stratified by the presence/absence of background hyperglycemia.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Q., Dai, M., Zhao, Y. et al. Association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and delirium in older hospitalized patients: a cohort study. BMC Geriatr 22, 277 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-02935-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-02935-6

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us