Skip to main content

Implementation of an integrative movement program for residents with dementia in a VA nursing home

Abstract

Background

Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIƉ) is an integrative group movement program developed for adults with mild-to-moderate dementia attending day programs. However, many older adults with dementia ultimately require assistance with their activities of daily living and become residents in nursing homes or other long-term care facilities with their complex comorbidities and unique needs. We conducted a post-implementation evaluation of PLIƉ at a San Francisco Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing home to assess reach and effectiveness among residents, staff, and family members who participated in ā‰„ā€‰1 PLIƉ class from 9/2018 to 6/2019.

Methods

Post-implementation number of classes offered and mean attendance; anonymous satisfaction surveys (5-point Likert scales); qualitative content analysis of open-ended survey responses and clinical progress notes.

Results

Forty-five PLIƉ classes were offered over 9 months. Residents attended an average of 13ā€‰Ā±ā€‰12 classes with an average class size of 14 residents, 4 staff members, and 2 family members. Most survey respondents rated the program overall as ā€œvery goodā€ or ā€œexcellentā€ (100ā€‰% residents, nā€‰=ā€‰15; 87ā€‰% staff, nā€‰=ā€‰14; 100ā€‰% family members, nā€‰=ā€‰8). Respondents reported improvements in themselves and/or others in four domains: (1) physical, (2) psychological, (3) social, and (4) cognitive. Physical improvements among veterans included mobility, strength, and energy. Psychological improvements included feelings of happiness/well-being, enjoyment, and self-empowerment. Social improvements included connection, social skills, and social support. Cognitive improvements included engagement, communication ability, and focus/attention. Responses were similar among resident, staff, and family member surveys and clinical progress notes. Participants frequently reported improvements in multiple domains (e.g., ā€œThe veterans are more alert and engaged, many are smiling and laughing.ā€). Negative comments were primarily related to logistics, suggesting that the class occur more frequently.

Conclusions

PLIƉ was successfully implemented in a VA nursing home with high attendance and satisfaction among residents, staff, and family members. Participants reported clinically meaningful physical, psychological, social, and cognitive benefits. Other long-term care facilities could potentially benefit from implementing PLIƉ to increase quality of life in residents with dementia.

Peer Review reports

Background

By 2050, the prevalence of Alzheimerā€™s disease and other dementias is projected to increase from 6 to 16Ā million in the United States, with one million new cases per year [1]. People with dementia (PWD) experience a progressive decline in cognitive function and increasing loss of independence that often negatively impacts their overall well-being, such as their mood and self-image, which can further reduce their quality of life.

Many PWD ultimately require assistance with their basic daily activities and become residents in nursing homes. Overall, 48ā€‰% of nursing home residents across the United States have Alzheimerā€™s or other dementias, and 61ā€‰% of PWD in nursing homes have moderate or severe cognitive impairment [2]. Veterans with dementia are especially complex patients with unique needs, since they frequently have mental health comorbidities such as post-traumatic stress disorder, substance use disorders, physical illnesses or injuries such as traumatic brain injuries, and/or may be homeless [3]. Disruptive and challenging behavioral symptoms often prevent the placement of veterans with dementia in community long-term care settings because they may pose health or safety risks to themselves or others, and those with the most severe symptoms are often cared for by nursing homes run by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), which are called Community Living Centers (CLCs).

The current mainstay pharmacological treatments for PWD (acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine) are associated with small symptomatic relief for some patients, but ultimately lack neuroprotective effects, do not alter the disease course, and do not improve quality of life [4]. Furthermore, the substantial adverse effects of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue lead many patients to discontinue these medications [5]. In contrast, there is a growing body of evidence that non-pharmacological interventions such as physical activity, cognitive/social stimulation and music therapy can improve a wide array of health outcomes while being much safer and sustainable [6,7,8,9]. Yet, few evidence-based non-pharmacological programs have been widely implemented and evaluated, particularly in the VA nursing home setting.

Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIƉ) is an integrative group movement program that was originally developed for people with mild-to-moderate dementia attending adult day programs [10, 11]. PLIƉ is grounded in neuroscience and targets abilities that are relatively well-maintained in PWD including the ability to learn new movement sequences to support daily function through repetition and procedural memory; the ability to notice in-the-moment bodily sensations; and the ability to experience joy and connect in meaningful ways with others. PLIƉ is also targets five key domains associated with better quality of life in PWD: physical function, cognitive function, well-being, social connection, and self-esteem [12,13,14,15,16,17].

The Core Elements of the PLIƉ program are shown in Fig.Ā 1. Each 45- to 60-minute class begins with participants seated in a circle and the instructor welcoming everyone to create a warm, accepting environment. The initial movement sequences involve tapping, massaging and naming body parts to bring participants into awareness of their bodies in the present moment. This is followed by deep breathing with arm movements and vocalization to promote full body breathing and a mindful rest. The instructor then leads the class through a series of upper and lower body movements sequences that are tailored to the needs and ability levels of the group. Step-by-step instruction and an errorless learning process are used to enable all participants to experience feelings of success. Many movements are interactive to encourage social engagement. Personally meaningful music is incorporated to enhance positive emotions. Each class ends with a repetition of the full-body tapping, massaging, and breathing, and participants are invited to share what brings them feelings of joy, happiness or appreciation.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIƉ) Core Elements and Adaptations

The original PLIƉ program and an adapted version for PWD and caregivers called Paired PLIƉ have shown clinically meaningful benefits for older adults with dementia and their care partners in the domains of physical, cognitive, and social and emotional functioning [10, 11, 18]. The goal of this study was to adapt PLIƉ for implementation at the San Francisco (SF) VA CLC and to evaluate the programā€™s impact on residents, staff, and family members.

Methods

Adaptation of PLIƉ for VA CLC

In 2017, we received a VA Innovators Award to explore strategies for scaling PLIƉ to reach more veterans. We first conducted semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, including VA national and local leaders, local clinical providers, community partners, veterans with dementia, and caregivers to learn about the status of VA care for veterans with dementia and unmet needs for CLC residents with dementia. We then identified two CLC clinical champions interested in becoming trained PLIƉ instructorsā€“a Psychiatric Mental Health Clinical Nurse Specialist (LM) and a Geriatric Nurse Practitioner specializing in Restorative Care (ML)ā€“and solicited their input on program adaptations to address local needs. Key adaptations (Fig.Ā 1) included: (1) no restrictions on class size (originally maximum of 10 participants with 2 instructors); (2) allowing participants in wheelchairs (originally excluded) and shifting movement focus from sit-to-stand transition to range-of-motion given greater levels of functional impairment; (3) allowing participants with comorbid mental and physical health issues (originally excluded); and (4) allowing non-resident participants including CLC staff, family or friends, volunteers, and paid caregivers (originally excluded). In addition, we assisted with creating a PLIƉ clinical progress note template so that champions could receive work credit for leading classes and tracking residentsā€™ participation and progress over time.

We then provided clinical champions with 14 weeks of experiential training from February 2018 to June 2018 facilitated by the PLIƉ Senior Instructor (JL) who assisted with study design and implementation. This included: (1) providing a detailed PLIƉ Training Manual; (2) conducting a brief ā€˜goals assessmentā€™ and medical record review for each potential participant with clinical champions to help tailor the program to best meet participantsā€™ goals and needs; (3) assisting with setting up the room and selecting personally meaningful music for classes; (4) providing and training in use of textured rubber balls for sensory stimulation; (5) providing weekly ā€˜teaching plansā€™ describing key program elements that would be emphasized; (6) delivering the program 2 days/week for 12 weeks with clinical champions participating as active assistants; and (7) debriefing with clinical champions after each class to assess what went well, what should be changed, and answer any questions. Feedback from debriefing sessions was continuously incorporated into the PLIƉ program in order to adapt to participantsā€™ evolving needs. After the 14-week training period, the clinical champions led classes on their own for another 12 weeks with the Senior Instructor attending once per week for 4ā€“6 weeks to provide feedback and support. After the clinical champions taught classes on their own, the Senior Instructor returned weekly for 4 weeks and then monthly for 3 months to provide feedback and support.

Post-implementation evaluation

In June 2019, approximately one year after the initial training was completed, we conducted an evaluation of PLIƉ implementation guided by the first two components of the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework [19, 20]. We assessed reach by reviewing class attendance logs to determine the number of classes offered, number of participants per class, and number of classes attended by each resident. We assessed effectiveness by administering anonymous surveys to those who attended one or more classes and analyzed PLIƉ clinical progress notes of resident participants.

Three related versions of the survey were created for (1) residents, (2) CLC staff and other non-resident participants such as volunteers, paid caregivers, and trainees, and (3) family members/friends. The surveys were administered to residents by the PLIƉ clinical champions who determined cognitive capacity of the residents based on clinical judgement and obtained verbal consent/assent for their participation. The first six questions asked participants to rate specific experiences during PLIƉ classes (e.g., I feel energized; I feel relaxed) using a 4-point Likert scale (never/rarely, sometimes, often, mostly/always). Overall satisfaction with PLIƉ was rated on a 5-point Likert scale (poor, fair, good, very good, excellent). All surveys ended with five open-ended questions about changes observed in themselves and other class participants as a result of participating in PLIƉ classes, what they liked most and least, and other comments.

Analysis

We analyzed qualitative data using a hybrid deductive and inductive approach to content analysis [21]. First, we applied codes developed in a previous qualitative evaluation of Paired PLIƉ. This included the following domains: physical (e.g., mobility); psychological (e.g., well-being); social (e.g., connectedness); and cognitive (e.g., communication). One coder (AA) applied initial codes to open-ended survey responses. Second, during the coding process, AA identified new concepts from participantsā€™ own words and developed preliminary inductive codes. The larger study team (AA, SM, MW, CO, FN, and DB) regularly reviewed findings and refined new codes through team-based discussions and consensus process. AA also reviewed PLIƉ clinical progress notes to identify descriptions of changes in key domains that were specifically attributed to participation in PLIƉ classes [22].

Results

Reach

Clinical champions offered 45 PLIƉ classes during the 9-month evaluation period (September 2018 to June 2019). A total number of 50 residents participated in PLIƉ at least once. On average, residents attended 13ā€‰Ā±ā€‰12 classes. The maximum number of classes attended by one resident was 40. In addition to the two clinical champions, PLIƉ classes included an average of 20 participants: 14 residents; 4 staff members, caregivers, volunteers, or trainees (e.g. nursing students, occupational therapy students); and 2 family members or friends of residents. At baseline, residents had a range of cognitive and functional abilities from ambulatory with supervision to non-ambulatory, able to communicate clearly to aphasic, and participating in multiple groups throughout the day and week versus disruptive in other group settings. The outpatient PLIƉ model involved mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment in which the older adults had good physical function (e.g. could stand up and sit down multiple times) whereas our residents were mostly wheelchair bound and needed assistance with transfers to the chair.

Effectiveness

Sixteen residents, 14 staff, and 8 family members were invited to take the survey, and all but one resident agreed to participate. The vast majority of residents, staff, and family members responded positively to all of the survey items about the PLIƉ classes (TableĀ 1). For example, 100ā€‰% of residents, 87ā€‰% of staff, and 100ā€‰% of family rated the program overall as ā€œvery goodā€ or ā€œexcellent.ā€ In addition, 100ā€‰% of the residents responded positively to statements such as ā€œI feel that I belong,ā€ 93ā€‰% of staff responded positively to statements such as ā€œI learn new skills for interacting with residents,ā€ and 100ā€‰% of family members responded positively to statements such as ā€œI feel closer to my family member.ā€

Table 1 Satisfaction ratings for residents, staff, and family members

Benefits for residents

Residents, family, and staff also reported benefits in residents during the PLIƉ classes across the following domains: (1) physical, (2) psychological, (3) social, and (4) cognitive (TableĀ 2).

Table 2 Changes observed in self as a result of participating in PLIƉ classes

(1) Physical. Residents reported a variety of personal physical benefits of participating in PLIƉ, including increased energy/alertness, flexibility, mobility, balance, strength, and general physical well-being. For example, a resident reported ā€œ[PLIƉ] improves my physical well-beingā€ and a resident noted that ā€œ[PLIƉ] gets me out of bed more.ā€ Sometimes, these positive physical changes were coupled with positive social changes as indicated by a family member who reported, ā€œhe is more social, and he moves better.ā€

(2) Psychological. The most common psychological change among residents was improved feelings of well-being and self-empowerment. We defined self-empowerment to be signs of positive thinking, increased motivation towards their goals, and greater self-esteem in taking charge of their life. Examples include, ā€œIā€™m more willing to exercise,ā€ and ā€œI see people making a greater effort, feeling inspired, feeling connected, feeling hopeful, feeling like [they] belong.ā€ Many residents reported feeling ā€œHappier.ā€ One resident reported feeling motivated by participating in PLIƉ: ā€œIā€™m not the only one who is disabled. When I see other [residents] who are more or less disabled, I try harder.ā€ Family and staff noticed increased positive emotions and self-empowerment in residents, with some residents also noticing these improvements in other veterans (TableĀ 3). One resident reported, ā€œThe others are happier too, especially Mr. X who sings or tries to talk with a smile on his face.ā€

Table 3 Changes observed in others as a result of participating in PLIƉ classes

(3) Social. Most residents reported increased feelings of connection, social skills, and social support. As one resident mentioned, ā€œThe entire group is very friendly and makes me feel safe to express myself. I love the facilitators.ā€ Other comments included, ā€œI have more empathy for others,ā€ and ā€œI feel safe. I feel welcome.ā€ One staff member commented, ā€œI see people making a greater effort, feeling inspired, feeling connected, feeling hopeful, feeling like they belong.ā€

(4) Cognitive. Several family members observed increased cognitive engagement in their loved ones (e.g., ā€œThey are more alert and engagedā€). In addition, some residents noticed increased communication/language skills in other veterans. For example, one resident reported ā€œSome [residents] made physical gains. Some speak better,ā€ and another said, ā€œPeer who was not able to speak before is trying to talk more and sometimes doesā€).

Confirmation in clinical progress notes

PLIƉ clinical progress notes written by clinical champions after each class echoed changes in physical, psychological, social, and cognitive domains reported by residents, staff, and family members. A total of 419 progress notes were reviewed for 27 residents. Positive changes were noted for 15 residents (56ā€‰%). For example, one note described physical improvements: ā€œHe demonstrates improved balance. He is now able to transfer with minimal assistance from wheelchair to regular chair.ā€ This same note continued with ā€œHe often comments how proud and comfortable he is to be in a regular chair,ā€ indicating related psychological benefits such as self-empowerment. Social and cognitive benefits were reported in another resident, whose progress note stated, ā€œShe is more interactive and engaged when she participates in the structured interventions of PLIƉ than when she is out in the general milieu.ā€ Cognitive changes related to communication skills were reported in another resident: ā€œEach week, he practices telling the group what he is grateful for. His ability to make himself understood verbally is increasing with time and practice.ā€ Sometimes evaluations touched on multiple domains: ā€œMr. G. was fully engaged, enthusiastic, and fully participatory throughout group. This is remarkable for this veteran with advanced dementia. He smiles from ear to ear and demonstrates that he is learning how to use his right hand to work with his paralyzed left hand through the coaching he receives from the clinical champions. In addition, his [caregiver] is learning and modeling how to engage him in ways that are pleasant, meaningful and interesting for him.ā€ Although most progress notes described positive changes, 6 resident notes (22ā€‰%) described changes such as falling asleep in class or being asking to leave the session for behavioral disruptions.

Positive ripple effect of PLIƉ on family and staff

In addition to changes observed in residents, several family members and staff reported experiencing meaningful improvements to their psychological well-being, ability to cope, and caregiving skills resulting from participation in PLIƉ. One family member reported, ā€œI have a new appreciation for life. Itā€™s easier to communicate with my husband. I learned how to communicate with him.ā€ A similar sentiment was shared by a staff member who stated, ā€œI have more empathy. I see more of peopleā€™s strengths and resilience and perseverance.ā€ Staff members reported feelings of relaxation and enjoyment (e.g. ā€œI like the feeling of calm. And I love seeing veterans so happy and engagedā€). A staff member noticed her greater social connectedness through feeling, ā€œMore energy, sense of connection to other vets, staff and communityā€ as a result of participating in PLIƉ.

Overall satisfaction

When asked what they liked most, majority of participants from all three groups described liking ā€œallā€ or ā€œeverythingā€ about the PLIƉ classes (TableĀ 4). Many participants specifically mentioned liking the social component of the PLIƉ classes. For example, one resident stated, ā€œinteractions with othersā€ was his favorite. Others mentioned liking the feelings of well-being derived from the PLIƉ classes, increased self-empowerment, enjoying themselves and seeing others enjoy themselves. For example, another resident stated, ā€œIt made me a better person.ā€ Some liked the physical improvements (e.g. ā€œthe ability to physically stretchā€) and increased energy/activity levels, while some respondents emphasized their joy in seeing participants ā€œlight upā€ and be more cognitively engaged. Some said they loved the music the most. A few described liking two aspects of the program equally (e.g. ā€œI enjoy the music and seeing residents smiling with their family membersā€).

Table 4 What people liked most about PLIƉ

When asked what they liked least about PLIƉ, several respondents commented on time/frequency, wishing the class was longer in duration, offered more often, or mentioning they disliked when class was canceled. Some staff members mentioned logistics regarding music, such as suggestions to involve more music or trying new music styles. One resident and one staff mentioned the equipment (e.g. ā€œsmall ballā€) as what they liked the least, and one staff member mentioned not having enough staff/volunteers to maximize participation.

Discussion

Our post-implementation evaluation of PLIƉ-CLC at SF VA showed that the program reached a large number of veterans, became a popular activity among them, and was effective based on participant-reported benefits in physical, psychological, social and cognitive domains in residents. In addition, PLIƉ-CLC provided a meaningful activity for family members and staff to engage with residents. Several staff and family members reported that they benefited from their involvement in the PLIƉ classes and learned how to better care for residents. It seems likely that improved communication, social skills, understanding, and psychological well-being of these key players further bolstered benefits for residents. Therefore, adapting the original program to include staff and family members may be one of the key changes that contributed to the benefits reported across multiple domains and resulted in long-term program sustainability.

Our results are consistent with studies showing that improving relationships between nursing home staff and residents can increase resident engagement and contribute meaningfully to their quality of life [23]. Working with nursing home residents can be very demanding for staff and lead to burnout, which has negative consequences for all parties involved: residents, family, and staff. Programs that enable staff to feel more empathy and connection with residents may improve their ability to engage residents in appropriate activities, redirect them when needed, and continue supporting them in the most effective ways possible and may ultimately result in greater job satisfaction and less burnout.

Our results also are consistent with studies finding that exercise and nonpharmacological interventions can improve health-related quality of life in nursing home residents with dementia [24, 25]. For example, a randomized control trial of a 12-week high-intensity exercise program for older adults with dementia in nursing homes resulted in a long-term statistically-significant improvement in balance and reduced agitation [26]. Another nursing home study found that movement-oriented restorative care resulted in a more positive self-image after a 12-month intervention compared to the control group [27]. An intervention combining physical with social activity in long-term care facilities found clinically meaningful and statistically-significant improvements in everyday function within a relatively short period of 7 weeks [28]. The strength of PLIƉ-CLC is that it uses a feasible multimodal approach based on neuroscience principles that seems to improve physical, psychological, social and cognitive functions in residents with dementia while additionally supporting the individuals caring for them.

Several staff and family members commented on the importance of incorporating more or different styles of music into the class. This recommendation is supported by studies finding that music therapy significantly reduces depression and agitation in nursing home residents with dementia. Ueda et al.ā€™s systematic review and meta-analysis found that music therapy had moderate effects on anxiety and behavioral symptoms of people with dementia, which was greater when the intervention was longer than 3 months [9]. Playing familiar music has been shown to evoke autobiographical memory, which in turn may improve self-awareness, global cognitive functioning, and neuropsychiatric symptoms [29, 30]. It is postulated that part of musicā€™s ability to enhance coding, memory, and cognition is through modulating physiological responses [29,30,31,32,33]. We observed music to be a powerful tool in stimulating residents collectively, eliciting movements, singing, clapping, and tapping. Integrating music as a modality in movement programs seems to be promising for having positive effects on people with dementia at nursing homes across the country.

One advantage of PLIƉ-CLC is that it is compatible with other CLC programs such as Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences adapted for veterans (STAR-VA), an efficacious interdisciplinary behavioral approach to managing challenging dementia-related behaviors and improving the care residents receive. A key component of STAR-VA is providing ā€œpleasant eventsā€ for residents to support their independence, autonomy, and sense of community [34]. Given that veterans expressed feelings of enjoyment in the PLIƉ-CLC classes and residents, family, and staff unanimously supported the program, requesting more classes per week, PLIƉ may provide CLCs and other nursing homes with an efficient model for increasing the frequency of pleasant events.

Although our evaluation results are generally positive, clinical progress notes documented some occurrences of poor engagement, such as residents falling asleep during some sessions or being escorted out of the class because of their disruptive behaviors. These are consistent with common behavioral symptoms in people with dementia and suggest that some residents may be more responsive to PLIƉ than others. It also is possible that evaluation survey responses were more positive than clinical progress notes due to selection or response bias.

Our studyā€™s strengths include collecting both quantitative and qualitative data, administering parallel surveys to residents, staff, and family members with a high response rate, and triangulation of survey responses with clinical progress notes. The consistency of findings using these different methods provide strong support for the validity of our results. Our results corroborate prior PLIƉ studies and the literature that non-pharmacologic interventions are effective for improving many aspects of quality of life in older adults with Alzheimerā€™s disease and related dementias, including physical function, emotional well-being, social engagement, cognitive function, and self-concept [10, 11, 22]. It builds on this by demonstrating that integrative moment programs can be effective for those with more advanced dementia and in settings beyond adult day programs. Although people living with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimerā€™s face many challenges, our results suggest that the principles of PLIƉ may help them improve well-being and slow their functional decline. We demonstrated the feasibility of training CLC staff members to deliver PLIƉ classes. In fact, these two clinical champions continued to deliver PLIƉ class two days per week continuously until March 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic led to cancellation of all group classes. Even during the pandemic, some staff members continued to perform PLIƉ movements 1-on-1 with residents. We are currently remotely training additional CLC staff members in SF and at another facility to deliver PLIƉ classes.

One limitation to our study was that some residents could only participate in one or two sessions because they were residing at the CLC temporarily to provide respite to their caregivers. This may explain the high number of veterans that PLIƉ-CLC reached and likely negatively skewed the number of sessions residents attended on average. There were 9 residents who attended minimal sessions due to respite status. The number of sessions offered in the 9 months also was limited due to a one-month quarantine period due to a norovirus outbreak. Another limitation is that the clinical champions who led the classes administered the evaluation survey to residents, which could have resulted in positive response bias In addition, we did not use validated measures to assess changes associated with PLIƉ, but rather relied on qualitative analysis of participant-reported observations. However, surveys completed by CLC staff and family members were anonymous and yielded results similar to residents, somewhat reducing these concerns.

The primary cost of implementing PLIƉ is related to staff time required to deliver and participate in the training. We estimate that our Senior Instructor dedicated 72Ā h to this training. This included leading 24 1-hour classes with both clinical champions participating as active assistants and also meeting with them before each class to prepare and after each class to debrief. Clinical champions were able to receive work credit for the classes because they were delivering clinical care to residents who participated. We are currently working to develop a remote training program that would reduce the cost and time burden of the training.

Conclusions and implications

PLIƉ was successfully adapted and implemented at the San Francisco VA CLC with excellent reach and effectiveness. Satisfaction was high among resident, staff, and family member participants. Participants reported physical, psychological, social, and cognitive benefits even in residents with greater disease severity. The results of our evaluation imply that programs like PLIƉ can be successfully implemented in nursing homes and long-term care facilities to provide a simple, effective model of dementia care that leads to substantial qualitative benefits among multiple domains of health and well-being.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CLC:

Community Living Center (VA Nursing Home)

PWD:

People with Dementia

PLIƉ:

Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise

RE-AIM:

Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance

STAR-VA:

Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences

SF:

San Francisco, California

VA:

Veterans Affairs

References

  1. 2017 Alzheimerā€™s disease facts and figures. Alzheimerā€™s & Dementia. 2017;13(4):325ā€“373.

  2. 2020 Alzheimerā€™s disease facts and figures. Alzheimerā€™s & Dementia. 2020;16(3):391ā€“460.

  3. Jutkowitz E, Halladay C, McGeary J, Oā€™Toole T, Rudolph JL. Homeless Veterans in Nursing Homes: Care for Complex Medical, Substance Use, and Social Needs. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2019;67(8):1707ā€“12.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Marasco RA. Current and evolving treatment strategies for the Alzheimer disease continuum. Am J Manag Care. 2020;26(8 Suppl):S167-s176.

  5. Birks J. Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimerā€™s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(1):Cd005593.

  6. Aguirre E, Woods RT, Spector A, Orrell M. Cognitive stimulation for dementia: a systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness from randomised controlled trials. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12(1):253ā€“62.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Forbes D, Thiessen EJ, Blake CM, Forbes SC, Forbes S. Exercise programs for people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(12):Cd006489.

  8. OlazarĆ”n J, Reisberg B, Clare L, et al. Nonpharmacological therapies in Alzheimerā€™s disease: a systematic review of efficacy. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;30(2):161ā€“78.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Ueda T, Suzukamo Y, Sato M, Izumi S-I. Effects of music therapy on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews. 2013;12(2):628ā€“41.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Wu E, Barnes D, Ackerman S, Lee J, Chesney M, Mehling W. Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIƉ): A Pilot Clinical Trial in Older Adults with Dementia. Aging & mental health. 2014;10:1ā€“10.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Wu E, Barnes DE, Ackerman SL, Lee J, Chesney M, Mehling WE. Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIƉ): qualitative analysis of a clinical trial in older adults with dementia. Aging & Mental Health. 2015;19(4):353ā€“62.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Marciniak R, Sheardova K, ČermĆ”kovĆ” P, Hudeček D, Å umec R, Hort J. Effect of Meditation on Cognitive Functions in Context of Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2014;8(17).

  13. Shapiro SL, Carlson LE, Astin JA, Freedman B. Mechanisms of mindfulness. J Clin Psychol. 2006;62(3):373ā€“86.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Laird KT, Paholpak P, Roman M, Rahi B, Lavretsky H. Mind-Body Therapies for Late-Life Mental and Cognitive Health. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018;20(1):2.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. GarcĆ­a-RodrĆ­guez B, Fusari A, RodrĆ­guez B, HernĆ”ndez JM, Ellgring H. Differential patterns of implicit emotional processing in Alzheimerā€™s disease and healthy aging. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;18(3):541ā€“51.

  16. Eldridge LL, Masterman D, Knowlton BJ. Intact implicit habit learning in Alzheimerā€™s disease. Behavioral Neuroscience. 2002;116(4):722ā€“6.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Smith SC, Murray J, Banerjee S, et al. What constitutes health-related quality of life in dementia? Development of a conceptual framework for people with dementia and their carers. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;20(9):889ā€“95.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Mehling EW, Scott MT, Duffy J, et al. Dyadic Group Exercises for Persons with Memory Deficits and Care Partners: Mixed-Method Findings from the Paired Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIƉ) Randomized Trial. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;78(4):1689ā€“706.

  19. Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, et al. RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review. Frontiers in Public Health. 2019;7(64).

  20. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322ā€“7.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2006;5(1):80ā€“92.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Casey JJ, Harrison KL, Ventura MI, Mehling W, Barnes DE. An integrative group movement program for people with dementia and care partners together (Paired PLIƉ): initial process evaluation. Aging Ment Health. 2020;24(6):971ā€“7.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Hartmann CW, Mills WL, Pimentel CB, et al. Impact of Intervention to Improve Nursing Home Residentā€“Staff Interactions and Engagement. The Gerontologist. 2018;58(4):e291ā€“301.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Wƶhl C, Siebert H, BlƤttner B. Interventions for promoting physical activity in nursing homes : Systematic review of the effectiveness of universal prevention. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 2017;50(6):475.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Yorozuya K, Kubo Y, Tomiyama N, Yamane S, Hanaoka H. A Systematic Review of Multimodal Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Cognitive Function in Older People with Dementia in Nursing Homes. Dementia & Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. 2019;48(1/2):1ā€“16.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Telenius EW, Engedal K, Bergland A. Long-term effects of a 12 weeks high-intensity functional exercise program on physical function and mental health in nursing home residents with dementia: a single blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:158.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Henskens M, Nauta IM, Scherder EJA, Oosterveld FGJ, Vrijkotte S. Implementation and effects of Movement-oriented Restorative Care in a nursing home - a quasi-experimental study. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):243.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Lorenz RA, Gooneratne N, Cole CS, Kleban MH, Kalra GK, Richards KC. Exercise and social activity improve everyday function in long-term care residents. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;20(6):468ā€“76.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  29. El Haj M, Antoine P, Nandrino JL, GĆ©ly-Nargeot MC, Raffard S. Self-defining memories during exposure to music in Alzheimerā€™s disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27(10):1719ā€“30.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  30. El Haj M, Postal V, Allain P. Music Enhances Autobiographical Memory in Mild Alzheimerā€™s Disease. Educational Gerontology. 2012;38(1):30ā€“41.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  31. Peck KJ, Girard TA, Russo FA, Fiocco AJ. Music and Memory in Alzheimerā€™s Disease and The Potential Underlying Mechanisms. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(4):949ā€“59.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  32. de la Rubia OrtĆ­ JE, GarcĆ­a-Pardo MP, Iranzo CC, et al. Does Music Therapy Improve Anxiety and Depression in Alzheimerā€™s Patients? J Altern Complement Med. 2018;24(1):33ā€“6.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  33. Moreno-Morales C, Calero R, Moreno-Morales P, Pintado C. Music Therapy in the Treatment of Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:160ā€“160.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  34. Karel MJ, Teri L, McConnell E, Visnic S, Karlin BE. Effectiveness of Expanded Implementation of STAR-VA for Managing Dementia-Related Behaviors Among Veterans. The Gerontologist. 2015;56(1):126ā€“34.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the study participants, caregivers, family members, volunteers, and staff who supported implementation of PLIE at the San Francisco VA CLC, particularly Ms. Amanda Lee, who participated during the initial training and implementation phase. The sponsor was not involved in study design, methods, recruitment, data collection, analysis, or manuscript preparation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the sponsors.

Funding

The Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIƉ) was developed and tested with support from Drew and Ellen Bradley and the Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 RX001507). This implementation and evaluation was funded through a VA Innovators Award, the Medical Student Training in Aging Research Program, the National Institute on Aging (T35AG026736), and the Lillian R. Gleitsman Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mr. A. Akram collected and analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript.Ā Dr. F. Nicosia provided guidance on data analysis and manuscript preparation, provided feedback on manuscript drafts, and approved the final version for publication.Ā Ms. J. Lee provided feedback on manuscript drafts and approved the final version for publication.Ā Ms. M. Lee assisted with data collection, provided feedback on manuscript drafts, and approved the final version for publication.Ā Ms. L. Martin assisted with data collection, provided feedback on manuscript drafts, and approved the final version for publication.Ā Mr. S. Martinez assisted with data analysis, provided feedback on manuscript drafts, and approved the final version for publication.Ā Ms. C. OrdoƱez assisted with data analysis, provided feedback on manuscript drafts, and approved the final version for publication.Ā Ms. M. Woo assisted with data analysis, provided feedback on manuscript drafts, and approved the final version for publication.Ā Dr. Barnes conceived of and designed the study; oversaw collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; and provided guidance on manuscript preparation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alirameen Akram or Deborah E. Barnes.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This project was classified as a quality improvement project by the San Francisco VA Medical Center because the findings were intended to inform VA operations and was therefore exempt from IRB review in compliance with VA Handbook 1058.05i.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

DB is a co-inventor of the Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIƉ) program and has the potential to earn royalties. DB, FN, and SM receive partial salary support from a Small Business Innovation Research grant from the National Institutes of Health awarded to Together Senior Health (R44-AG059520) to develop and test an online platform to deliver livestreaming, virtual group PLIƉ classes. JL is a part-time employee of Together Senior Health.

Additional information

Publisherā€™s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akram, A., Nicosia, F., Lee, J. et al. Implementation of an integrative movement program for residents with dementia in a VA nursing home. BMC Geriatr 21, 607 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02494-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02494-2

Keywords