Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Association between self-reported walking speed and calcaneal stiffness index in postmenopausal Japanese women

BMC Geriatrics volume 20, Article number: 466 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Osteoporosis and related fractures, a worldwide public health issue of growing concern, is characterized by compromised bone strength and an increased risk of fracture. Here we show an association between self-reported walking speed and bone mass among community-dwelling postmenopausal Japanese women aged 50 years and older.

Design; cross-sectional study

Setting and Participants; The survey population included 1008 postmenopausal women 50–92 years of age residing in rural communities.

Methods

Self-reported walking speed was ascertained by asking the participants: “Is your walking speed faster than others of the same age and sex?” to which participants responded “yes (faster)” or “no (moderate/slower).” Calcaneal stiffness index was measured.

Results

Women with a faster self-reported walking speed were younger and had a lower BMI, higher stiffness index, and higher grip strength than women with a slower walking speed. Multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, BMI, grip strength, comorbidity, current smoking, and alcohol drinking status showed a significant association between faster self-reported walking speed and higher calcaneal stiffness index (p <  0.001).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that questionnaires of walking speed may be useful for predicting bone mass and that a fast self-reported walking may benefit bone health in postmenopausal women.

Peer Review reports

Brief summary

Faster walking speed was related to higher calcaneal stiffness index after adjusting for age, BMI, grip strength, comorbidities, smoking, and alcohol drinking in postmenopausal Japanese women.

Background

Osteoporosis and related fractures comprise a major life-threatening issue for elderly individuals worldwide [1]. This issue is particularly serious in Japan, which has the highest life expectancy worldwide. The prevalence of osteoporosis is significantly higher in women than in men [2]. Therefore, maintaining or improving the bone quality of elderly women has become of increased interest in recent years.

A low bone mass is associated with osteoporosis, defined as a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength predisposing a person to an increased risk of fracture. It is important to acknowledge a common misconception that osteoporosis is always the result of bone loss [3]. Quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) is reportedly useful for evaluating bone mass. Although the diagnosis of osteoporosis is commonly based on measurements taken on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, which has been considered the gold standard, [4, 5] QUS is now widely used because it is a non-ionizing and low-cost method against osteoporosis [6]. Moreover, also phalangeal quantitative ultrasound have been recently associated to fracture risk and poor bone health [7, 8].

Gait speed may be a simple and accessible indicator of health in the older person [9]. Moreover, it is featured in emerging consensus definitions of sarcopenia and frailty [10, 11]. A slower usual walking speed is a risk factor for adverse outcomes, including decreased activities of daily living, [12] falls and institutionalization, [13] and fracture and cognitive decline [14].

However, measuring walking speed requires observer training and more time than simply asking a person to self-report their customary walking speed. Moreover, not all research studies involve face-to-face contact with study participants and not all research and clinical settings have the space to set up a walking course. In addition, an older person may temporarily lack the ability to complete a walking assessment during periods of acute illness, injury, or hospitalization. Therefore, an alternative approach to characterizing customary walking speed would be valuable in settings in which direct measurements are not feasible.

Increased stress on the bone during physical activity could stimulate maintained or increased bone density [15]. However, the role of customary physical activity such as walking has remained inconclusive [16]. Walking speed was shown to contribute to bone health in women over 60 years of age [17]. Increased walking speed increases the vertical ground reaction force [18]; thus, daily brisk walking might contribute to bone health [17]. Self-reported walking speed is strongly associated with measured walking speed among community-dwelling people [19]. We hypothesized that fast self-reported walking speed could increase the vertical ground reaction force and increase bone stress, which may positively affect bone health.

To date, the effect of self-reported walking speed on bone mass has not been well studied. Thus, this study aimed to assess the association of self-reported walking speed with bone mass among community-dwelling Japanese postmenopausal women aged 50 years and older.

Methods

Participants voluntarily enrolled in the study. Written consent forms were available in Japanese to ensure comprehensive understanding, and each participant provided informed consent. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Human Use of Nagasaki University (project registration no. 14051404).

The survey population included 1012 postmenopausal women 50–92 years of age residing in rural communities in Goto city in western Japan who underwent a general medical check-up in 2014 and 2016 as recommended by the Japanese government. All participants had sufficient cognitive function to complete the questionnaire.

Trained interviewers obtained information about the participants’ clinical characteristics. Comorbidity data including heart disease, lung disease, stroke, or diabetes mellitus (DM) were also collected.

Self-reported walking speed was ascertained by asking the participants: “Is your walking speed faster than others of the same age and sex?” Participants responded “yes (faster)” or “no (slower).” This was one of the four walking speed questions related to true walking speed [20].

Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA; dB/MHz) and speed of sound (SOS; m/s) through the right calcaneal bone were measured using an Achilles ultrasound bone densitometer (GE Lunar Corp., Madison, WI, USA). Calcaneal stiffness index, a function of BUA and SOS, was automatically calculated by the scanner software according to the following formula: [21] Stiffness index = (0.367 × BUA) + (0.28 × SOS) - 420.

Patient body weight and height while wearing light clothing were measured using an automatic body composition analyzer (BF-220; Tanita, Tokyo, Japan), and body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) was calculated.

Grip strength was recorded as the grip strength from two measurements performed with each hand using a handgrip dynamometer (Smedley, Matsumiya Ika Seiki Seisakujo, Tokyo, Japan); the maximum value as used in the analysis.

Statistical analysis

Women with missing values for any variables were excluded from analysis, leaving 1008 women for our analysis. Comparisons of age, BMI, stiffness index, grip strength, comorbidities, current smoking, and current alcohol drinking between subjects with faster versus slower self-reported walking speeds were performed using Student’s t-test for continuous variables or the chi-square test for nominal variables.

Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the effects of faster self-reported walking speed on calcaneal stiffness index with the adjustment for age, BMI, grip strength, comorbidity, current smoking, and current alcohol drinking.

Values of p <  0.05 were considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

The subjects’ characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean age, BMI, stiffness index, and grip strength were 69.1 years, 22.8 kg/m2, 66.3, and 20.8 kg, respectively. Sixteen percent of the cohort had at least one comorbidity, 2% were current smokers, and 12% were current drinkers. The prevalence of faster self-reported walking speed was 41.5% (418/1008).

Table 1 Participants’ characteristics (N = 1008)
Full size table

Table 2 compares the variables between subjects with faster versus slower self-reported walking speeds. Women with a faster self-reported walking speed were younger and had a lower mean BMI, higher stiffness index, and higher grip strength than those with a slower self-reported walking speed (p <  0.05).

Table 2 Comparison of variables between subjects with faster versus slower self-reported walking speed (N = 1008)
Full size table

Multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, BMI, grip strength, comorbidities, current smoking, and current alcohol drinking showed a significant association between faster self-reported walking speed and higher calcaneal stiffness index (p <  0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3 Association between faster self-reported walking speed and calcaneal stiffness index: results of multiple regression analysis adjusted for age, body mass index, grip strength, comorbidities, current smoking, and current alcohol drinking (N = 1008)
Full size table

Discussion

Stiffness index and self-reported walking speed

Women with a faster self-reported walking speed had a higher mean stiffness index than those with a slower self-reported walking speed after the adjustment for age, BMI, grip strength, comorbidities, current smoking, and current alcohol drinking. A previous study showed that self-reported walking speed is a good marker of measured walking speed [19]. Self-reported walking speed is a useful measurement when the use of actual walking speed is not feasible. Cross-sectional studies have reported that calcaneus bone quality in elderly women is significantly associated with walking speed, stride length, and total number of steps [17, 22]. Increased walking speed caused a significant increase in activities of the lumbar erector spine, biceps femurs, and medial gastrocnemius; lumbar motion; and vertical ground reaction force in the loading response and mid-stance phases [18]. Therefore, women with a faster self-reported walking speed may be placing an increased mechanical strain on bone due to an increased vertical ground reaction force and consequently gain bone mass.

Stiffness index and age

In this study, older age was associated with a lower stiffness index in postmenopausal women. This result supports that of a previous study that calcaneus stiffness index significantly decreased with aging [23]. Gregg et al. reported that, in addition to age-related bone loss, menopause-related acceleration of a loss of stiffness index appears to occur in the perimenopausal period [24]. This result suggests that measuring and maintaining bone mass is important in postmenopausal women.

Stiffness index and BMI

The present study showed that a higher BMI was associated with a higher stiffness index in postmenopausal women. A higher BMI was associated with a higher stiffness index, similar to previous reports [23]. However, since obesity (a high BMI) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and DM, maintaining a healthy BMI is recommended to support general health.

Stiffness index and grip strength

In this study, a stronger grip strength was associated with a higher stiffness index in postmenopausal women. Previous studies demonstrated a relationship between stronger grip strength and a higher stiffness index [25]. Poor physical performance in elderly people may be reduced due to mechanical strain on bone resulting from reduced physical activity, [26] leading to a bone mass reduction. These results suggest a strong role of maintaining muscular strength for preventing bone loss in healthy and functionally independent elderly people.

Bone mass and comorbidities (heart disease, lung disease, stroke, DM)

Patients with chronic heart failure had a lower reported bone mass than those without it [27]. The prevalence of osteoporosis is reportedly higher in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than in healthy subjects. Bone mass losses were greatest among patients with severe lung disease [28]. At 1 year of follow-up, a decreased bone strength index was reported in chronic stroke patients [29]. Several factors reportedly affect bone quality (and mass) in patients with DM, mainly due to reduced bone turnover [30]. Although our multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for such comorbidities, no significant difference was noted. Further studies, including other potential confounders, are needed to clarify the associations between comorbidities and bone mass.

Stiffness index and smoking and alcohol drinking

Several studies indicated that smoking and alcohol consumption influence bone loss, although others did not confirm these findings [31]. In the present study, current smoking and current alcohol drinking was selected as explanatory variables on stiffness index in the multiple regression model. Few subjects were current smokers (2.1%) or current drinkers (11.9%). Thus, smoking and alcohol consumption appeared not to have a major influence on stiffness index in this study.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, because actual walking speed was not measured, the relationship between actual walking speed and self-reported walking speed could not be examined directly in this subject. Second, because this study was conducted in a cross-sectional setting, these results do not show a causal relationship. Longitudinal studies are required to establish causal relationships between self-reported walking speed and bone mass. Third, the study subjects were community-dwelling residents who voluntarily attended a health examination, contributing to selection bias. It might suggest that the subject’s awareness of health may be higher than that in non-attendants. Therefore, our results can’t be adapted to the general population. Fourth, the present results were obtained from only Japanese women; therefore, it is not possible to extrapolate the results to men or individuals of other ethnicities. Fifth, potential confounders that can affect self-reported walking speed and decreased bone mass, such as a sedentary lifestyle, vitamin D deficiency, low calcium intake, secondary hyperparathyroidism, peripheral nerve dysfunction, disorders of skeleton, vertebral osteoarthrosis, kyphosis, current medications, years after menopause, and renal insufficiency, were unavailable for participants in this study.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that questionnaires of walking speed may be useful for predicting bone mass and that a fast self-reported walking speed may benefit bone health and contribute to a high bone mass in postmenopausal women.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets obtained and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available as the datasets are highly detailed and we are planning to publish more papers using the same dataset. The datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BUA:

Broadband ultrasound attenuation

BMI:

Body mass index

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

QUS:

Quantitative ultrasonography

SOS:

Speed of sound

References

  1. Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone. 1995;17(5 Suppl):505s–11s.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Mabuchi A, En-Yo Y, Yoshida M, et al. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, lumbar spondylosis, and osteoporosis in Japanese men and women: the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study. J Bone Miner Metab. 2009;27(5):620–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 2001, 285(6):785–795.

  4. Boyer KA, Kiratli BJ, Andriacchi TP, Beaupre GS. Maintaining femoral bone density in adults: how many steps per day are enough? Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(12):2981–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanis JA, Delmas P, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D. Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(4):390–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Njeh CF, Boivin CM, Langton CM. The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(1):7–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Catalano A, Morabito N, Basile G, Fusco S, Castagna G, Reitano F, et al. Fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women referred to an Italian center for osteoporosis: a single day experience in Messina. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2013;10(3):191–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Catalano A, Gaudio A, Agostino RM, Morabito N, Bellone F, Lasco A. Trabecular bone score and quantitative ultrasound measurements in the assessment of bone health in breast cancer survivors assuming aromatase inhibitors. J Endocrinol Investig. 2019;42(11):1337–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, et al. Gait speed and survival in older adults. Jama. 2011;305(1):50–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vermeulen J, Neyens JC, van Rossum E, Spreeuwenberg MD, de Witte LP. Predicting ADL disability in community-dwelling elderly people using physical frailty indicators: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11:33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, Bauer J, Beauchet O, Bonnefoy M, et al. Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(10):881–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cooper R, Kuh D, Cooper C, Gale CR, Lawlor DA, Matthews F, et al. Objective measures of physical capability and subsequent health: a systematic review. Age Ageing. 2011;40(1):14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Howe TE, Shea B, Dawson LJ, Downie F, Murray A, Ross C et al: Exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;7:Cd000333. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000333.pub2.

  16. Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. Meta-analysis of walking for preservation of bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Bone. 2008;43(3):521–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun W, Watanabe M, Tanimoto Y, Kono R, Saito M, Hirota C, et al. Assessment of the best gait parameter in relation to bone status in community-dwelling young-old and old-old women in Japan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009;49(1):158–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chiu MC, Wang MJ. The effect of gait speed and gender on perceived exertion, muscle activity, joint motion of lower extremity, ground reaction force and heart rate during normal walking. Gait Posture. 2007;25(3):385–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Syddall HE, Westbury LD, Cooper C, Sayer AA. Self-reported walking speed: a useful marker of physical performance among community-dwelling older people? J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(4):323–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cong GT, Cohn MR, Villa JC, Kerwin LJ, Rosen N, Fang XZ, et al. The walking speed questionnaire: assessing walking speed in a self-reported format. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(4):e132–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hans D, Schott AM, Chapuy MC, Benamar M, Kotzki PD, Cormier C, et al. Ultrasound measurements on the os calcis in a prospective multicenter study. Calcif Tissue Int. 1994;55(2):94–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yanagimoto Y, Oshida Y, Sato Y. Effects of walking on bone quality as determined by ultrasound in the elderly. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000;10(2):103–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoshimi I, Aoyagi K, Okano K, Yahata Y, Kusano Y, Moji K, et al. Stiffness index of the calcaneus measured by quantitative ultrasound and menopause among Japanese women: the Hizen-Oshima study. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2001;195(2):93–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gregg EW, Kriska AM, Salamone LM, Roberts MM, Anderson SJ, Ferrell RE, et al. The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(2):89–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagai A, Tajika T, Yamamoto A, Okura C, Kanazawa S, Takagishi K. Relations between quantitative ultrasound assessment of calcaneus and grip and key pinch power in Japanese mountain village residents. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017;25(1):2309499017690321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Taaffe DR, Simonsick EM, Visser M, Volpato S, Nevitt MC, Cauley JA, et al. Lower extremity physical performance and hip bone mineral density in elderly black and white men and women: cross-sectional associations in the health ABC study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003;58(10):M934–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xing W, Lv X, Gao W, Wang J, Yang Z, Wang S, et al. Bone mineral density in patients with chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:343–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bolton CE, Ionescu AA, Shiels KM, Pettit RJ, Edwards PH, Stone MD, et al. Associated loss of fat-free mass and bone mineral density in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(12):1286–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lam FM, Bui M, Yang FZ, Pang MY. Chronic effects of stroke on hip bone density and tibial morphology: a longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(2):591–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hygum K, Starup-Linde J, Harslof T, Vestergaard P, Langdahl BL. MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY: diabetes mellitus, a state of low bone turnover - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;176(3):R137–r157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ross PD. Osteoporosis. Frequency, consequences, and risk factors. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(13):1399–411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the study participants and Goto City Office for their assistance in carrying out the Nagasaki Islands Study.

Funding

The manuscript does not contain any individual person’s data in any form.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Therapy, Tokyo Professional University of Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan

    Yoshihito Tomita

  2. Department of Public Health, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan

    Yoshihito Tomita, Kazuhiko Arima, Satoshi Mizukami, Takayuki Nishimura, Natsumi Tanaka, Yuzo Honda, Mitsuo Kanagae, Yasuyo Abe & Kiyoshi Aoyagi

  3. Department of Rehabilitation, Nishi-Isahaya Hospital, Isahaya, Japan

    Satoshi Mizukami & Mitsuo Kanagae

  4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

    Ritsu Tsujimoto

  5. Department of Community Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

    Shin-ya Kawashiri & Takahiro Maeda

  6. Department of Human Science, Faculty of Design, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Takayuki Nishimura

  7. Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tokyo Kasei University, Saitama, Japan

    Takuhiro Okabe

  8. Faculty of Health Science, Kumamoto Health Science University, Kumamoto, Japan

    Kazumi Nakahara

  9. Department of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan

    Naoko Yamamoto

  10. Department of Health Science, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

    Izumi Ohmachi

  11. Ken-Hoku Health Care Office, Nagasaki, Japan

    Hisashi Goto

  12. Medical Policy Division, Nagasaki Prefectural Government, Nagasaki, Japan

    Maiko Hasegawa

  13. Ken-Nan Health Care Office, Nagasaki, Japan

    Youko Sou

  14. Center for Public Relations Strategy, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan

    Itsuko Horiguchi

  15. Department of island and rural medical research, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

    Fumiaki Nonaka

  16. Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

    Mami Tamai & Atsushi Kawakami

  17. Department of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan

    Hirotomo Yamanashi

  18. Center for Comprehensive Community Care Education, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

    Yasuhiro Nagata

Authors
  1. Yoshihito Tomita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kazuhiko Arima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Satoshi Mizukami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ritsu Tsujimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shin-ya Kawashiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Takayuki Nishimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Takuhiro Okabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Natsumi Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yuzo Honda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kazumi Nakahara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Naoko Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Izumi Ohmachi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Hisashi Goto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Maiko Hasegawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Youko Sou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Itsuko Horiguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Mitsuo Kanagae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Yasuyo Abe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Fumiaki Nonaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Mami Tamai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Hirotomo Yamanashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Yasuhiro Nagata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Atsushi Kawakami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Takahiro Maeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Kiyoshi Aoyagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KA1 (Kazuhiko Arima), MT, HY, YN, AK, TM and KA2 (Kiyoshi Aoyagi) designed the study. YN, AK, TM and KA2 secured funding. YT collected and analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. KA1 supervised and assisted with data collection, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. SM, RT, SK, TN, TO, NT, YH, KN, NY, IO, HG, MH, YS, IH, MK, YA, FN, MT and HY advised on study design and data analysis and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuhiko Arima.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Participants voluntarily enrolled in the study. Written consent forms were available in Japanese to ensure comprehensive understanding, and each participant provided informed consent. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Human Use of Nagasaki University (project registration no. 14051404).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomita, Y., Arima, K., Mizukami, S. et al. Association between self-reported walking speed and calcaneal stiffness index in postmenopausal Japanese women. BMC Geriatr 20, 466 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01858-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01858-4

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us