Skip to main content

The influence of integrated geriatric outpatient clinics on the health care utilization of older people

Abstract

Background

The number of people aged greater than 65 years is growing in many countries. Taiwan will be a superaged society in 2026, and health care utilization will increase considerably. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the geriatric integrated outpatient clinic model for reducing health care utilization by older people.

Methods

This was a retrospective case-control study. Patients aged greater than 65 years seen at the geriatric outpatient clinic (Geri-OPD) and non-geriatric outpatient clinic (non-Geri-OPD) at a single medical centre were age and sex matched. Data on the number of outpatient clinic visits, emergency department visits, hospitalizations and medical expenditures were collected during the first and second years. A subgroup analysis by Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and older age (age80 years) was performed, and the results were compared between the Geri-OPD and non-Geri-OPD groups.

Results

A total of 6723 patients were included (3796 women and 2927 men). The mean age was 80.42 ± 6.39 years. There were 1291 (19.2%) patients in the Geri-OPD group and 5432 (80.8%) patients in the non-Geri-OPD group. After one year of regular follow-up, the Geri-OPD patients showed a significant reduction in the types of drugs included in each prescription (5.62 ± 10.85) and the number of clinic visits per year (18.18 ± 48.85) (P < 0.01). After a two-year follow-up, the number of clinic visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations and the annual medical costs were still decreased in the Geri-OPD patients. The Geri-OPD patients had more comorbidities and a higher rate of health care utilization than the non-Geri-OPD patients. In the subgroup analysis, patients with more comorbidities (CCI2) and an older age (80 years) in the Geri-OPD group showed a significant reduction in health care utilization. The Geri-OPD patients also showed a significant decrease in medical utilization in the second year compared with the non-Geri-POD patients.

Conclusion

The Geri-OPD reduced medical costs, the number of drugs prescribed, and the frequency of outpatient clinic visits, emergency department visits and hospitalizations in older patients with complicated conditions. The effect was even better in the second year.

Peer Review reports

Background

People aged 65 years or older are the world’s fastest-growing group, according to the United Nations’ report in 2019 [1]. Sixty-six percent of the increase in the older population between 2015 and 2050 will occur in Asia [2]. The ageing process leads not only to physical impairment but also to mental and social problems. It results in increased dependency and greater spending on health care [3]. Age-associated chronic disorders, such as dementia and cardiovascular diseases, account for most of the disease burden, leading to enormous costs in higher income countries [4, 5]. Polypharmacy resulting from multiple comorbidities is also an important issue in older people. It is not only an economic burden but also a risk factor for mortality and morbidity [6]. The definition of polypharmacy is variable. In general, polypharmacy refers to excessive unnecessary drug consumption or the use of high numbers of drugs and is a convenient evaluation method to use in practice [7, 8]. Older adults using more than 8 drugs have increased risks of rehospitalization [9]. Higher comorbidities are associated with increased risks of adverse drug events, which results in a vicious cycle [10].

Frail older people with multi-morbidity have a greater chance of receiving fragmented medical care, which is associated with unnecessary medical utilization and increased medical costs [11,12,13]. In recent years, some programmes, such as the Program of Research to Integrate Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy (PRISMA) in Canada and the Health and Welfare Information Portal (ZWIP) study in the Netherlands, have aimed to integrate health care and social services for frail older people [13, 14]. A decrease in functional decline and fewer emergency room visits were obtained after 3 years in the PRISMA study, for which the coverage rate reached 70% [14]. Barriers to integrated care, such as funding, leadership, time constraints, care system complexity and shared values, could affect the outcomes [14].

Taiwan is aging at a very high speed. Taiwan became an aging society in 1993; it became an aged society in 2018 and will be a superaged society in 2026 [3]. More than two-thirds of older people have one chronic disease. Approximately 5% of men and 18% of women in Taiwan have 3 or more chronic diseases [15]. The medical fees for people aged older than 65 years increased by 7.5% every year from 1998 to 2006 in Taiwan [15]. In 2007, older adults in Taiwan comprised 10.1% of the population but accounted for 36.2%, approximately 512 billion New Taiwan dollars (NTD), of yearly medical costs [15]. Polypharmacy is frequent in the Taiwanese aged population; 81.1% had received more than 5 prescriptions, and 38.1% had major polypharmacy (i.e., more than 10 medications) [16]. Taiwan’s 2016–2060 population projections disclosed that the birth rate decreased, and the country will have negative population growth in 2021 but an increased proportion of aged groups. The medical burden has grown rapidly with the aging speed in Taiwan. In addition, the dependency ratio will rise from 36 out of every 100 persons of working age in 2016 to 93 out of 100 by 2060. The trend of an increased proportion of older people and decreased population growth in Taiwan is similar to that described in the 2015 United Nations’ report. The report showed that the population aged greater than 60 years was the fastest growing group but that the global population will reach a negative growth rate [2, 3]. Taiwan is located in East Asia, and its traditional concepts include respecting and caring for parents and grandparents. Therefore, the caregiver burden will increase along with the elevated dependency rate. In Taiwan’s health insurance system, patients are not limited to seeking medical services from specialists in the hospital and do not need a referral from primary care physicians. However, demanding medical resources and fragmented medical services have resulted in rapidly growing burdens in terms of outpatient department (OPD) visits and medical costs. Therefore, integrated medical care is important to reduce unnecessary medical utilization and rising medical costs in a rapidly aging society, and we have established geriatric integrated outpatient clinics for older patients who are frequent users of outpatient services. The establishment of an integrated clinic in the hospital was supported by a programme of the National Health Insurance Administration.

Geriatric integrated outpatient clinic at KMUH (Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital): The geriatricians at the clinic provided patients with individualized care plans after performing a comprehensive geriatric assessment. The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is defined as “a multidimensional and multidisciplinary process that identifies medical, social and functional needs and develops an integrated multidisciplinary care plan to meet the need” [17]. Psychiatrists, doctors of rehabilitation and physical medicine and neurologists can be consulted at the same time. The geriatrician integrates the medicine and the treatment plans. The pharmacist, the dietitian and the social worker provide recommendations when they are consulted in the clinic. The health educator provides health education and connects the patients to social resources and long-term care services as needed. The patients are transferred from other doctors because of their polypharmacy or high utilization of medical care, such as consulting 3 or more physicians for their care or experiencing frequent emergency room visits or repeated hospitalizations. Other patients seek out the clinic on their own because they want to receive integrated care for similar problems. The medical fee is paid by the National Health Insurance. The geriatric integrated clinic is promoted in the hospital to doctors and patients via posts and an electronic system.

Hospital inpatients who are older than 55 years are the major beneficiaries of the CGA in terms of mortality, daily living activities and independence [17]. However, the effect of the CGA in the clinic on health care utilization is less often reported. In this study, we evaluated the effect of geriatric integrated outpatient clinics on reducing health care utilization in older people.

Methods

We enrolled patients from the geriatric integrated outpatient clinic at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUH), a tertiary medical centre, from January 1, 2013, to July 31, 2016, as the target subjects (the Geri-OPD group). All patients were aged older than 65 years. These patients received regular outpatient clinic follow-up. “Regular follow-up” was defined as at least four service claims annually for ambulatory or outpatient clinics because the longest possible prescription in our insurance system was 3 months. The matched control group (the non-Geri-OPD group) for this study was also extracted from the KMUH Research Database (KMUHRD). Patients in this control group were also older than 65 years and had at least four service claims in the Department of Internal Medicine or the Division of Family Medicine or Neurology for similar medical conditions. We randomly selected 5432 control subjects (4 for every target patient) who were matched with the study group in terms of age and sex by the electronic system. Chart numbers were used to avoid duplication in both groups. In our study, polypharmacy was defined as more than 8 kinds of long-term drugs used for chronic disease control. The primary outcomes were the number of outpatient clinic visits, the number of medication prescriptions and cost. Secondary outcomes were the number of hospitalizations and emergency room visits. Patients who received renal replacement therapy before visiting the geriatric integrated outpatient clinic and patients with malignancy were not included because these diseases require high medical resource utilization that is difficult to reduce with a geriatric integrated OPD.

The KMUHRD includes data for approximately 800,000 patients who attended KMUH from 2009 to 2016. The KMUHRD offers a comprehensive database with coverage of ambulatory care, hospital admissions, dental services, drug dispensation records, and biochemical data. All diagnoses are coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). The database is managed by the Division of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics of KMUH. To protect the confidentiality of the study participants and to comply with the Personal Information Protection Act, all personal identifiers have been removed, and only authorized researchers were permitted to perform data linkage, processing and statistical analyses with specified computers in a separate room with 24-h monitoring using encrypted identifiers. All data analysts were required to sign a confidentiality agreement. Tables and figures from the statistical analysis were permitted to be released only after inspection by managing personnel. This study was performed after obtaining the approval of the institutional review board of KMUH.

Comparisons were performed between the target study group and the matched control group. The baseline demographics of these two groups were described in terms of sex, age, comorbidities, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), number of hospitalizations, number of outpatient clinic visits, number of emergency department visits, and medical cost in the year before the index date. We performed 6-month, one-year and 2-year analyses for these 2 groups for number of hospitalizations, outpatient clinic visits, emergency department visits, and medical expenditures. A subgroup analysis with the CCI classification was performed to evaluate the efficacy of integrated outpatient clinics for the oldest population and for high comorbidity patients (CCI ≥ 2). A CCI score greater than 2 or 3 was defined as a high comorbidity score and is related to high mortality [18,19,20,21,22].

The chi-square test was used to compare the distribution of sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidity between the two groups. Data are expressed as percentages or the mean ± standard deviation for patient medical utilization estimates, and the independent t-test was used for continuous variables. Medical utilization was calculated 1 year before and 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after the index visit for analysis. Medical costs in NTD were expressed after logarithmic transformation of the original values. All data processing and statistical analysis were performed with SAS 9.4 software (Cary, NC, USA).

Results

A total of 6723 patients were enrolled; 1291 (19.2%) patients were from the Geriatric Integrated Outpatient Clinic (the Geri-OPD group), and 5432 (80.8%) patients were not from the clinic (the non-Geri-OPD group). The mean age was 80.42 ± 6.39 years, and 56.46% were women. In the population older than 80 years, the mean age was 85.67 ± 4.17 years. In the CCI ≥ 2 population, the mean age was 81.61 ± 6.28 years.

At baseline, the Geri-OPD group had significantly more comorbidities, including congestive heart failure (6.6%), peripheral vascular disease (1.7%), pulmonary disease (10.8%), peptic ulcers (11.7%), diabetes mellitus (19.2%), diabetes mellitus complications (10.5%), and depression (4.5%). In the subgroup analysis of the patients aged greater than 80 years, the Geri-OPD group had a higher percentage of congestive heart failure, pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus and depression than the non-Geri-OPD group. Among the high comorbidity patients (CCI ≥ 2) in the Geri-OPD group, cerebrovascular accidents, diabetes mellitus and renal disease accounted for higher percentages of the comorbidities. The Geri-OPD patients had significantly higher medical utilization than the non-Geri-OPD patients, a finding that was also the case for the age80 and CCI2 subgroups. For instance, Geri-OPD patients had 66.40 ± 51.45 OPD visits every year and non-Geri-OPD patients had 35.86 ± 48.53 outpatient visits per year (P < 0.0001). The median interquartile range (IQR) of OPD visits among every Geri-OPD patient every year was 67, and in non-Geri-OPD patients, it was 56 (P < 0.0001). The Geri-OPD patients with a CCI ≥ 2 took 24.05 ± 4.86 kinds of drugs, and non-Geri-OPD patients took 21.69 ± 10.67 kinds of drugs on average (P < 0.0001), indicating severe polypharmacy. The annual outpatient care cost of the Geri-OPD group and the non-Geri-OPD group was 507.7 ± 408.0 (log NTD) and 269.1 ± 403.2 (log NTD), respectively (P < 0.0001). The median IQRs of annual outpatient care costs were 522.55 (log NTD) and 412.06 (log NTD) for the Geri-OPD and non-Geri-OPD groups, respectively (P < 0.0001) (Table 1, Additional file Table S1 and Table S2).

Table 1 Basic patient demographics

At the one-year follow-up, the Geri-OPD patients had a reduction of 5.62 ± 10.85 drugs among the kinds of drugs used; in comparison, the non-Geri-OPD patients had 0.30 ± 10.51 more drugs used in every prescription (P < 0.0001). The number of outpatient clinic visits was reduced by 18.18 ± 48.85 visits per year (P < 0.0001), and the annual cost of outpatient visits also decreased for the Geri-OPD patients. However, the number of annual hospitalizations (times/year), the annual length of hospital stays (days/year) and the cost of each hospitalization (log NTD) increased significantly among the Geri-OPD patients (0.11 ± 1.24, 1.60 ± 19.64, and 1.13 ± 6.54, respectively) (Fig. 1, Table 2 and Table 3). In the subgroup analysis of the patients aged older than 80 years, patients treated at geriatric clinics had a reduction of 17.75 ± 51.94 visits among annual outpatient visits, whereas the patients treated at non-geriatric clinics had 4.33 ± 30.66 more annual outpatient visits (P < 0.0001). The Geri-OPD patients were prescribed 5.79 ± 10.87 fewer drugs, but the non-Geri-OPD patients were prescribed 1.02 ± 10.44 more drugs (P < 0.0001). The Geri-OPD patients had decreased medical costs at each ambulatory care visit but higher medical expenditures for hospitalization (Fig. 2, Additional file Table S3 and Table S5). Among the CCI ≥ 2 patients, the Geri-OPD patients had a decrease in the number of annual outpatient visits by 7.56 ± 55.95 visits, while the non-Geri-OPD patients had an annual increase in outpatient visits of 10.04 ± 39.85 visits (P < 0.0001). The Geri-OPD patients were prescribed 1.49 ± 7.34 fewer medications, while the non-Geri-OPD patients an increase of 2.58 ± 8.96 drugs among the number of drugs prescribed was noted (P < 0.0001). The Geri-OPD patients had decreased medical costs at each outpatient visit, while the non-Geri-OPD patients had increased medical expenditures (P = 0.0005). Both the Geri-OPD and non-Geri-OPD patients had increased hospitalization expenditures and lengths of hospital stays (Fig. 3, Additional file Table S4 and Table S6).

Fig. 1
figure1

High health care utilization decreased significantly in Geri-OPD patients

Table 2 Health care utilization of all patients
Table 3 Change in the health care utilization of all patients
Fig. 2
figure2

Health care utilization also decreased significantly in Geri-OPD patients aged ≥80 years

Fig. 3
figure3

The reduction in health care utilization was obvious in the Geri-OPD patients with a CCI ≥ 2

At the two-year follow-up, in the Geri-OPD group, the number of outpatient visits, drugs prescribed, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations and the costs were significantly reduced compared to those in the non-Geri-OPD group. The effect was the same for the subgroups of patients older than 80 years and those with a CCI ≥ 2. The patients with higher comorbidities (CCI2) had much higher medical expenditures; however, the older population (age80 years) had medical utilization similar to that of the whole group of patients (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure4

Health care utilization decreased gradually over 2 years of Geri-OPD follow-up

In summary, this retrospective study revealed that the geriatric integrated outpatient clinic reduced the annual medical costs of outpatient care because it was associated with a decrease of 18 outpatient visits within 1 year and an average decrease of 5 kinds of medications for every prescription.

Discussion

The integrated care model of our geriatric ambulatory clinic did reduce the frequency of outpatient visits and the number of drugs prescribed and thus the total annual cost of outpatient care. However, medical expenditures associated with hospitalization increased in the first year for the Geri-OPD patients compared with the non-Geri-OPD patients. In the second year, ambulatory clinic visits, emergency department visits, the frequency of hospitalizations and cost decreased significantly compared with the first year of geriatric integrated outpatient clinic care. The Geri-OPD patients still had more outpatient and emergency visits and higher medical expenditures for every hospitalization than the non-Geri-OPD patients; however, the annual medical costs for outpatient care and hospitalization and the length of hospitalization did not significantly differ between these two populations after 2 years.

In this study, the dramatic decrease in the number of medical services (outpatient visits) and drugs prescribed reduced medical expenditures in the geriatric integrated outpatient clinic. The older patients who received geriatric integrated outpatient clinic care in our study had reduced health care utilization in the first year (Fig. 1), and this was reduced even further in the second year, which was better than the results in other reports in recent years [13, 14]. The overall proportion of patients with multiple doctor visits was as high as 39.4%, according to the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan [23]. The top five reported diagnoses of older people treated at ambulatory care visits were diseases involving the circulatory, respiratory, musculoskeletal, and nervous systems and endocrine disorders [24]. Our geriatric integrated care model involved geriatricians, neurologists, psychiatrists and doctors in physical medicine and rehabilitation, social workers, health educators, dietitians and pharmacists. Thus, we could handle the most common problems of older adults who were frequent users of insurance. The CGA is an important part of our integrated care system at the outpatient clinic, especially in the evaluation of geriatric syndrome and patient-centred care. There is currently no standardized algorithm for acute and chronic care for older people [25].

The average number of outpatient clinic visits of older adults (older than 65 years) in Taiwan was reported to be 26.8 ± 22.7 (mean ± standard deviation) visits per year in 2004 [24]; the number in our study was 66.40 ± 51.45 for the Geri-OPD patients and 35.86 ± 48.53 in the control group. The number of outpatient clinic visits in our study was much higher than that in other reports [26,27,28]. The high health care utilization was related not only to how complicated the patients’ conditions were but also to the near-total coverage of medical fees by the national insurance system. The latter factor affected the patients’ health care-seeking behaviours. The most common comorbidities in patients with multiple physician visits in Taiwan are type 2 diabetes mellitus (3.68%) and hypertension (3.79%), according to the National Health Insurance Database [23]. In our study, the most common comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (19.2%) and cerebrovascular accidents (20.1%). Our patients had more complicated conditions than the average patient in Taiwan. The reduction in health care utilization was even more obvious in the second year of our study, which indicated that the treatment plans required time to take effect for older patients with complicated conditions. The trend was most obvious in the oldest patients in the population. The number of prescriptions actually increased in the first year, which may have been secondary to newly diagnosed problems, such as geriatric syndrome. Geriatric syndrome was frequently missed and was considered normal ageing before the implementation of the CGA. Therefore, increased health care utilization was needed in the first year to treat newly diagnosed medical problems and modify drug use. The use of the CGA in outpatient services has been less studied. One possible reason is that the CGA and subsequent formation of an individualized plan are time consuming. We tried to separate the CGA and the plan formulation process into the first 2 or 3 visits in our clinical practice, and this helped us to identify major and potential problems in an efficient way. According to a previous review article, the performance of the CGA in the clinic had no statistical effect on survival, but one recent randomized controlled trial showed a beneficial effect on frailty after 2 years in patients with very complicated conditions (age ≥ 75 years, ≥ 3 current diagnoses, and ≥ 3 hospitalizations during the 1 year prior to study inclusion) [29, 30]. Our study provides evidence that performing a CGA in the outpatient clinic for patients with complicated conditions can reduce their high health utilization for 2 years.

Health care utilization was reduced in the subgroup of Geri-OPD patients with a high number of comorbidities in our study (Fig. 3). Approximately 34% of the patients in our study had a high number of comorbidities (CCI ≥ 2). Higher numbers of comorbidities are correlated with an increased cost of hospitalizations and high economic burden, which was also found in our study. Librero reported that patients with more comorbidities have a longer length of hospital stay, higher mortality, and higher readmission rates [31]. A higher number of comorbidities is likely to lead to more complications during admission, which results in higher medical costs for each hospital stay. Multidisciplinary interventions can reduce hospital admissions and falls in older adults and increase patient satisfaction with health care services, but institutionalization and mortality rates might not decrease [32,33,34]. In our study, the subgroup of patients with more comorbidities had higher health care utilization than the subgroup of patients older than 80 years (Fig. 4). The high number of comorbidities was associated with high health care utilization in our study. However, the average age of all patients and of the two subgroups was older than 80 years, which may underestimate the effect of ageing on health care utilization.

Initially, the average number of medications used by our patients was more than 20. The number of drugs used by Geri-OPD patients after geriatric integrated outpatient clinic care was significantly less than that of non-Geri-OPD patients. Nevertheless, all of the patients in this study still took more than 15 kinds of medications, even after the second year. It was difficult to reduce the number of drugs used in patients with multiple comorbidities. Thus, we focused on the prevention of potentially inappropriate prescriptions. In several studies and reviews, polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing had an adverse effect on older people due to the higher risk of falls and drug-related harm [35,36,37]. From 2001 to 2004, 19.1% of patients older than 65 years who were covered by Taiwanese National Health Insurance had an inappropriate medication prescription according to the Beers criteria [38]. Older people taking inappropriate medications have significantly more ambulatory care visits, emergency department visits and hospital admissions [38]. A prospective study including 6666 adults aged older than 50 years in Ireland revealed that polypharmacy (> 4 medications) was associated with the number of falls in older adults if antidepressants or benzodiazepines were included [39]. A previous study revealed that 50% of older adults take one or more medications that are unnecessary and that having a clinical pharmacist on the multidisciplinary team could help reduce drug numbers [40]. Polypharmacy could be attributable to the presence of multiple chronic diseases and to patients visiting multiple ambulatory clinics because Taiwan’s health insurance does not restrict health care utilization by any individual. In our geriatric outpatient integrated care system, unnecessary medications were discontinued after the treatment goal was set, and the patient’s functional status was considered. This intervention could slow down the vicious cycle of comorbidities, multiple ambulatory clinic visits, polypharmacy, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations.

An integrated care model for older people was discussed in 1983 by Albert and included acute care units, rehabilitation day hospitals, nursing homes, outpatient clinics, and home care [41]. Compared to traditional outpatient clinics, integrated outpatient clinics can decrease acute care utilization, reduce medical costs and decrease subspecialty clinic use, as was the case for the Collaborative Assessment and Rehabilitation for Elders (CARE) Program in the United States, which was designed for chronically ill older adults who did not meet the indications for inpatient rehabilitation [26,27,28, 42]. Geriatric evaluation can reduce functional decline without increasing medical cost [42,43,44,45]. It is difficult to efficiently develop appropriate guidelines for caring for older people with several comorbidities [46, 47]. In the preliminary data of one study that embedded geriatric service into primary care by providing on-site consultations with a geriatrician and geriatric nurse case manager, the mean number of subspecialty clinic visits (7.4 ± 9.8) declined significantly during the first year after enrolment and after the second year [26]. Fragmented care was evident in that study. In our efficient geriatric integrated care model, which was provided in the outpatient department of the hospital, we reduced the health care utilization of the oldest group of patients, who had complicated conditions and needed a very high number of clinic visits per year.

Integrated health care for older adults is currently an important issue and will continue to be important in the future. Families and well-trained caregivers are an important part of a comprehensive integrated care system. Geriatric clinics that include a range of health services can provide older patients with more convenient medical services [48]. The health care expenditures of healthier older people are similar to those of less healthy people despite their longer life expectancy [49]. Our care model reduced unnecessary medical services and saved medical resources. Polypharmacy and the high frequency of outpatient clinic visits remain serious problems that consume medical resources in our society. A change in health care policy and intervention can improve polypharmacy problems, as evidenced by Japan’s experience and in other studies [50, 51].

This retrospective study has some limitations. There may be patient selection bias in that we did not stratify the patients according to the number of comorbidities. The variation in different comorbidities could affect the amount of medical utilization. The included patients came from only one hospital. However, we selected patients from other internal medicine departments who were similar in age and comorbidities to be the control group and were matched by age and sex. This statistical method used in this study reduced the selection bias. Future studies of the geriatric integrated outpatient clinic approach may focus on its role in caring for patients with multiple comorbidities and for the oldest people and in providing late life care.

Conclusion

The geriatric integrated outpatient clinic reduced medical costs, the number of drugs prescribed, and the frequency of outpatient clinic visits, emergency department visits and hospitalizations in a two-year follow-up of older patients with complicated conditions. The effect was much better in the second year. This model can provide a possible solution for older people with high medical utilization. Geriatric integrated outpatient care provides a comprehensive treatment plan and connections to social resources for older people, thereby reducing the utilization of medical resources. Geriatric health policy may encourage older people with high medical utilization to seek geriatric integrated outpatient care rather than visiting multiple specialists.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

Geri-OPD:

Geriatric outpatient clinic

non-Geri-OPD:

Non-geriatric outpatient clinics

CCI:

Charlson comorbidity index

CGA:

Comprehensive geriatric assessment

IQR:

Interquartile range

References

  1. 1.

    United Nations. World population prospects 2019: highlights. New York, NY: United Nations; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    United Nations. World pupulation projects 2015: key findings and advance tables. New York, NY: United Nations; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    National Development Council. Population projections for republic of China (Taiwan): 2016-2060. Taiwan: National Development Council; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Prince MJ, Wu F, Guo Y, Gutierrez Robledo LM, O'Donnell M, Sullivan R, Yusuf S. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet (London, England). 2015;385(9967):549–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sander M, Oxlund B, Jespersen A, Krasnik A, Mortensen EL, Westendorp RG, Rasmussen LJ. The challenges of human population ageing. Age Ageing. 2015;44(2):185–7.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hajjar ER, Cafiero AC, Hanlon JT. Polypharmacy in elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007;5(4):345–51.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Masnoon N, Shakib S, Kalisch-Ellett L, Caughey GE. What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):230.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kadam UT, Roberts I, White S, Bednall R, Khunti K, Nilsson PM, Lawson CA. Conceptualizing multiple drug use in patients with comorbidity and multimorbidity: proposal for standard definitions beyond the term polypharmacy. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;106:98–107.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sganga F, Landi F, Ruggiero C, Corsonello A, Vetrano DL, Lattanzio F, Cherubini A, Bernabei R, Onder G. Polypharmacy and health outcomes among older adults discharged from hospital: results from the CRIME study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15(2):141–6.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Field TS, Gurwitz JH, Avorn J, McCormick D, Jain S, Eckler M, Benser M, Bates DW. Risk factors for adverse drug events among nursing home residents. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(13):1629–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bahler C, Huber CA, Brungger B, Reich O. Multimorbidity, health care utilization and costs in an elderly community-dwelling population: a claims data based observational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kern LM, Seirup JK, Rajan M, Jawahar R, Stuard SS. Fragmented ambulatory care and subsequent healthcare utilization among Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Manag Care. 2018;24(9):e278–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Robben SH, Huisjes M, van Achterberg T, Zuidema SU, Olde Rikkert MG, Schers HJ, Heinen MM, Melis RJ. Filling the gaps in a fragmented health care system: development of the health and welfare information portal (ZWIP). JMIR Res Protoc. 2012;1(2):e10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hebert R, Raiche M, Dubois MF, Gueye NR, Dubuc N, Tousignant M. Impact of PRISMA, a coordination-type integrated service delivery system for frail older people in Quebec (Canada): a quasi-experimental study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010;65b(1):107–18.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    劉見祥.吳秀玲: 高齡化對全民健康保險制度之影響 Community development journal quarterly 2009, 125:112–127.

  16. 16.

    Wu YH, Chen CC, Wu TY. Geriatric polypharmacy in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2016;115(11):891–2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Parker SG, McCue P, Phelps K, McCleod A, Arora S, Nockels K, Kennedy S, Roberts H, Conroy S. What is comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)? An umbrella review. Age Ageing. 2018;47(1):149–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mangin D, Bahat G, Golomb BA, Mallery LH, Moorhouse P, Onder G, Petrovic M, Garfinkel D. International Group for Reducing Inappropriate Medication use & Polypharmacy (IGRIMUP): position statement and 10 recommendations for action. Drugs Aging. 2018;35(7):575–87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ofori-Asenso R, Zomer E, Chin KL, Si S, Markey P, Tacey M, Curtis AJ, Zoungas S, Liew D. Effect of comorbidity assessed by the charlson comorbidity index on the length of stay, costs and mortality among older adults hospitalised for acute stroke. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(11):2532.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sheng SP, Strassle PD, Arora S, Kolte D, Ramm CJ, Sitammagari K, Guha A, Paladugu MB, Cavender MA, Vavalle JP. In-hospital outcomes after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(2):e011206.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, Januel JM, Sundararajan V. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(6):676–82.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kuo MC, Jeng C, Chen CM, Jian WS. Profile of elderly with multiple physician visits: advocacy for tailored comprehensive geriatric assessment use in clinics. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014;14(2):372–80.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yi-Tsong Lin S-JH, Chen L-K, Chen T-J, Hwang IH. ambulatory health care utilization of the older people under the National Health Insurance in Taiwan. J Clin Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;2(2):53–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Severinsen KD, Tufton A, Hannan E, Schwind JS, Schmucker D, Cutler A. Evaluating outcomes from an integrated health service for older patients. Ochsner J. 2015;15(4):423–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Engel PA, Spencer J, Paul T, Boardman JB. The geriatrics in primary care demonstration: integrating comprehensive geriatric care into the medical home: preliminary data. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(4):875–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Evans LK, Yurkow J, Siegler EL. The CARE program: a nurse-managed collaborative outpatient program to improve function of frail older people. Collaborative assessment and rehabilitation for elders. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43(10):1155–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Reiss-Brennan B, Brunisholz KD, Dredge C, Briot P, Grazier K, Wilcox A, Savitz L, James B. Association of Integrated Team-Based Care with Health Care Quality, utilization, and cost. Jama. 2016;316(8):826–34.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kuo HK, Scandrett KG, Dave J, Mitchell SL. The influence of outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment on survival: a meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004;39(3):245–54.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mazya AL, Garvin P, Ekdahl AW. Outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment: effects on frailty and mortality in old people with multimorbidity and high health care utilization. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(4):519–25.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Librero J, Peiro S, Ordinana R. Chronic comorbidity and outcomes of hospital care: length of stay, mortality, and readmission at 30 and 365 days. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(3):171–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Beswick AD, Rees K, Dieppe P, Ayis S, Gooberman-Hill R, Horwood J, Ebrahim S. Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet (London, England). 2008;371(9614):725–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Moe RH, Grotle M, Kjeken I, Olsen IC, Mowinckel P, Haavardsholm EA, Hagen KB, Kvien TK, Uhlig T. Effectiveness of an integrated multidisciplinary osteoarthritis outpatient program versus outpatient clinic as usual: a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(2):411–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Di Pollina L, Guessous I, Petoud V, Combescure C, Buchs B, Schaller P, Kossovsky M, Gaspoz JM. Integrated care at home reduces unnecessary hospitalizations of community-dwelling frail older adults: a prospective controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kojima T, Akishita M, Nakamura T, Nomura K, Ogawa S, Iijima K, Eto M, Ouchi Y. Association of polypharmacy with fall risk among geriatric outpatients. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2011;11(4):438–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kojima T, Akishita M, Nakamura T, Nomura K, Ogawa S, Iijima K, Eto M, Ouchi Y. Polypharmacy as a risk for fall occurrence in geriatric outpatients. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012;12(3):425–30.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tommelein E, Mehuys E, Petrovic M, Somers A, Colin P, Boussery K. Potentially inappropriate prescribing in community-dwelling older people across Europe: a systematic literature review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;71(12):1415–27.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lai HY, Hwang SJ, Chen YC, Chen TJ, Lin MH, Chen LK. Prevalence of the prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications at ambulatory care visits by elderly patients covered by the Taiwanese National Health Insurance program. Clin Ther. 2009;31(8):1859–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Richardson K, Bennett K, Kenny RA. Polypharmacy including falls risk-increasing medications and subsequent falls in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults. Age Ageing. 2015;44(1):90–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(1):57–65.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fisk AA. Comprehensive health care for the elderly. Jama. 1983;249(2):230–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Wieland GD, English PA, Sayre JA, Kane RL. Effectiveness of a geriatric evaluation unit. A randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med. 1984;311(26):1664–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Boult C, Boult LB, Morishita L, Dowd B, Kane RL, Urdangarin CF. A randomized clinical trial of outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(4):351–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Baztan JJ, Suarez-Garcia FM, Lopez-Arrieta J, Rodriguez-Manas L, Rodriguez-Artalejo F. Effectiveness of acute geriatric units on functional decline, living at home, and case fatality among older patients admitted to hospital for acute medical disorders: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2009;338:b50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Unutmaz GD, Soysal P, Tuven B, Isik AT. Costs of medication in older patients: before and after comprehensive geriatric assessment. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:607–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. Jama. 2005;294(6):716–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Cohen HJ, Feussner JR, Weinberger M, Carnes M, Hamdy RC, Hsieh F, Phibbs C, Courtney D, Lyles KW, May C, et al. A controlled trial of inpatient and outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(12):905–12.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Stock RD, Reece D, Cesario L. Developing a comprehensive interdisciplinary senior healthcare practice. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(12):2128–33.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lubitz J, Cai L, Kramarow E, Lentzner H. Health, life expectancy, and health care spending among the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(11):1048–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Onoue H, Koyama T, Zamami Y, Hagiya H, Tatebe Y, Mikami N, Shinomiya K, Kitamura Y, Hinotsu S, Sendo T, et al. Trends in polypharmacy in Japan: a nationwide retrospective study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(12):2267–73.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Goulding MR. Inappropriate medication prescribing for elderly ambulatory care patients. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(3):305–12.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all participating doctors and staff members in the Geriatric Outpatient Department of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YJW, CFH, TJF, and MSH: study concept and design. YTH, YJW and TJF: statistical analyses. YJW and TJF: drafted the manuscript. All authors: data analysis and interpretation and revision of the manuscript. The author (s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tzu-Jung Fang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The consent to participate was not required due to the retrospective nature of the data used in the study. The Ethics Committee of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital approved the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Demographics of patients aged 80 years. Table S2. Demographics of the patients with a Charlson comorbidity index 2. Table S3. Health care utilization by patients aged 80 years. Table S4. Health care utilization by patients with a Charlson comorbidity index2. Table S5. Change in health care utilization by patients aged 80 years. Table S6. Change in health care utilization by patients with a Charlson comorbidity index 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, Y., Hsieh, C., Huang, Y. et al. The influence of integrated geriatric outpatient clinics on the health care utilization of older people. BMC Geriatr 20, 379 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01782-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Geriatric integrated outpatient clinic
  • Older people
  • Health care utilization
  • Comprehensive geriatric assessment