Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a muticomponent workout program integrated in an evidence based multimodal program in hyperfrail elderly patients: POWERAGING randomized clinical trial protocol



Short-term and mid-term comparison of the efficacy of a multimodal program that incorporates a therapeutic workout program, medication review, diet adjustment and health education, in comparison to the standard medical practice in the improvement of the neuromuscular and physiological condition. Furthermore, it is intended to analyse the maintenance of these effects in a long-term follow-up (12 months) from the onset of the intervention.


A randomized clinical trial of elderly frail patients drawn from the Clinical Management Unit “Tiro de Pichón”, Health District of Malaga, will be included in the study (after meeting the inclusion / exclusion criteria) will be randomized in two groups: a control group that will undergo an intervention consistent of medication review + diet adjustment + health education (regular workout recommendations within a complete advice on healthy lifestyles) and an experimental group whose intervention will consist of a multimodal treatment: therapeutic workout program+ medication review+ diet adjustment + health education. The sociodemographic, clinical and tracing variables will be reflected at the beginning of the study. In addition, the follow-up variables will be gathered at the second and sixth months after the beginning of the treatment and at the third and sixth months after the treatment (follow-up). The follow-up variables that will be measured are: body mass index, general health condition, fatigue, frailty, motor control, attention- concentration- memory, motor memory, spatial orientation, grip strength, balance (static, semi-dynamic), gait speed and metabolomics.

A descriptive analysis of the sociodemographic variables of the participants will be conducted. One-Factor ANOVA will be used for the Within-Subject analysis and as for the Between-Subject analysis, the outcome variables between both the groups in each moment of the data collection will be compared.


A multimodal program that incorporates a therapeutic workout program, medication review, diet adjustment and health education may be effective treatment to reduce the functional decline in elderly. The results of the study will provide information on the possible strengths and benefits in multimodal program in elderly.

Trial registration NCT02772952 registered May 2017.

Peer Review reports


In the year 1990, the WHO defines the elderly population as people aged 65 or above [1]. In the recent years, a new paradigm of aging has emerged that has been addressed as: healthy, good aging, competent, successful or active [2]. This concept has evolved, back from the definition of healthy aging given by the WHO in 1990 (health centralized), towards a much more integrated model, such as the one of active aging [3]. Aging is a deleterious, progressive, intrinsic and universal process that eventually occurs in all living entities as a result of the interaction of a living being’s genetics and its environment [4]. The ways of aging are neither determined nor prefixed; and although we can’t ignore that there are genetic variables that play an important role in aging, the individual is also responsible for a, more or less, satisfactory and free from dependence aging, with its actions and behaviour throughout its life [2], hence making it possible to discuss three basic forms of aging: usual, pathological and optimal aging [2].

According to the recent estimations, the world population above 65 years old were 528 million in the year 2010, and will be more than 605 million in the year 2015. The United Nations forecast for Spain in the year 2015, for the population above 65 years, is estimated in more than 8 million of subjects [5], entailing more than 18% of the Spanish population (CNE, Centro Nacional de Epidemiología). The Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs claims that life expectancy draws an ascendant progression in most of the developed countries; nevertheless, that doesn’t necessarily imply that the increased number of years in this indicator would be years in a good health condition. In most of the cases, the elderly population are affected by diseases and health issues that result in quality of life deterioration, even if they don’t occur in immediate death [6].

Aging has been traditionally treated as rather “pathological” [7]. Nonetheless, this vision is being replaced by another one that defends that, although there are certain diseases that indeed appear more frequently in the old age than in other stages of life, this doesn’t mean that both of these aspects are intrinsically associated [7]. In fact, there is enough empirical evidence to assert that both health care interventions and lifestyle habits significantly contribute to an improvement of a life expectancy without any impairments [7, 8].

Hence, there is a pressing need of identifying those factors that influence the onset of impairment and dependence in the elderly, both of which notably deplete the quality of life in this age group [7, 8]. It is in this context that the concept of “frailty” appears, a concept that refers to something that can relatively deteriorate with ease [7, 8]. Currently it’s defined as a biological syndrome with a decrease of the reserve and endurance to physical and psychological stress factors that increase the vulnerability to adverse situations [7]. This concept has gained importance since its inception and it has risen to take an important role in the scientific literature on aging. At present, frailty is assumed to be a construct that often underlies health deterioration that occurs in the elderly, there being an emerging agreement that the frailty markers include age related reduced lean body mass, strength, endurance, balance, walking speed and low activity [8].

Moreover, while frailty, impairment and dependence typically coexist, frailty seems to be prior and, thus, likely to be early intervened on [9]. Therefore, it’s crucial to specifically identify the features of the people that confirm the group of “elderly frail” being convinced that this information could help to elaborate targeted interventions to prevent and/or to a more effective intervention in the courses of impairment and dependence. It is here where the starting point of the current investigation work is established.

Frailty commonly has a major impact on the patient’s quality of life, leading to undesirable consequences in the physical capacities, intellectual activity, emotional aspects, personal relations and cognitive issues [10]. Among the most frequent cognitive problems, decreased selective attention, loss of memory, mental confusion, and concentration difficulties, are described [11]. Despite there being a great emphasis to the assessment of the cognitive problems, these shouldn’t be solely interpreted, as the consequences could have a negative reflection on the functional impairment, depressive states, sleep pattern variations, and even social vulnerability [12]. A reliable, inexpensive and valid way to identify the effect that the patient suffers is using self-administered surveys [13]. The results of patient-provided measures are used as an assessment and/or follow-up tool to objectively reflect the patient’s health condition or its functional status at a specific moment. These tools help the physicians to understand the impact of a disease or condition over the patient’s symptoms, performance and skills.

Furthermore, changes and modifications that occur as a result of frailty, are reflected in the body’s metabolic balance [14]. These changes can be collected and analysed through the use of metabolomics (a technique that comprises the development of systematic profiles from the multiple metabolite concentrations and their cellular and systemic fluctuations in response to drugs, diet, lifestyle, environment, stimuli and genetic modulations, in order to distinguish beneficial and adverse effects of such interactions [15]. By systematically measuring biomarkers (metabolites) in the population, profiles can be set among healthy individuals from those with specific diseases [16]. Moreover, metabolomics may provide signs of a metabolic disorder or a lesion with high precision and less cost than genomics, transcriptomics or proteomics [17].

Finally, the evaluation of the physical function is an important component of the geriatric assessment in the elderly [18, 19]. These measurements have shown to have sufficient discriminating sensitivity and have proven the ability to predict the outcomes, such as risk of falls, institutionalization, and death [20, 21]. There are tests based on the strength, walking speed or the transition between the different daily life positions that have proven to have a high sensitivity in the diagnosis of frailty [19, 21]. This set of tests to assess fitness and performance have proven to be reliable and valid for assessing the functional impairment in the elderly that live in nursing homes [20]. Recently, several studies have examined the functional physical function which make up the functional test and the instruments used, together with improvements to the instruments, specifically attaching inertial sensors to the body [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44].

The specific applications for these elements are already being developed for use in a wide range of situations [44, 45]. Such uses include assessing and quantifying kinematic variables related to functional tasks [24,25,26, 43], identifying trembling in people suffering from Parkinson’s disease [22] and measuring Cobb angles in X-rays [45]. Another application is the development of an objective method to classify levels of physical activity and an indicator of the degree of functional capacity and quality of life [46] and gait characteristic analysis and identification based on the smartphone’s accelerometer and gyrometer [47].

Therefore, the use of different assessment methods by means of which the elderly are analysed from different perspectives (physical, mental, metabolomics, subjective, etc.), could help to identify the elderly frail, which would enable setting up the intervention protocols intended to reverse theses deficient states or at least, slowing their progression.

In this respect, in order to planning any intervention, it’s important to note that the quality of muscle mass, namely, force production per unit of active muscle mass, has been associated to the functional ability in the elderly population [48]. Muscle quality provides an estimate of the contribution of the neuromuscular factors related to changes in the development of strength, as when the strength is increased while maintaining the same muscle mass, this suggests neural adapting to training [49].

In this sense, a combination of strength and endurance training in the elderly population has been suggested to be the most effective strategy to improve both neuromuscular and cardiorespiratory functions, the preservation of the functional ability and health promotion during old age [50, 51]. However, several studies have proven that in the simultaneous training, the “interference effect” may appear, reducing the strength adaptations when it is compared to only strength training [52], even when the participants of the training protocols are the elderly, [50, 51], being noticed not only in the strength training, but as well in those that are intended to a better cardiorespiratory performance in the elderly population [50, 51]. Thus, along with the amount of aerobic training and intensity, within-session workout sequence could be an important variable in the prescription of simultaneous training [50], as the strength performance just before the endurance training compromises endurance gaining [50].

A decrease in muscle quality has been associated with decreased functional ability in the elderly population [48]. To counteract this process, some studies have proven that quality strength training increases muscle mass in the elderly [49,50,51].



The interaction of various intervention strategies, wherein a supervised workout program, medication review, diet adjustment and health education are included, should achieve further improvements of the neuromuscular and physiological state in the elderly identified as frail, than the standard medical practice.


Short-term and mid-term comparison of the efficacy of a multimodal program that incorporates a therapeutic workout program, medication review, diet adjustment and health education, in comparison to the standard medical practice in the improvement of the neuromuscular and physiological condition. Furthermore, it is intended to analyse the maintenance of these effects in a long-term follow-up (12 months) from the onset of the intervention. The workout program consists of a specific part for the development of strength followed by another specific part for endurance training. This sequence has better results than if structured inversely according to previous study [50].

Design and study patients

The design of the present study is a randomized clinical trial that will be developed in frail elderly people. The present study is a randomized controlled clinical trial conforming to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. We refer to hyperfrail to the patients located in the 1/3 of the screening normalized scores, coming from the Clinical Management Unit “Tiro de Pichón”, Health District of Malaga. The inclusion criteria that were established were patients older over 65 years old that, after screening of frailty according to the Short Physical Perfomance Battery (SPPB) series of tests recommended in the Consensus Document by the Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality on prevention of frailty and falls in the elderly patients, could carry out the program of therapeutic workout [53]. The information and signature of the informed consent are indispensable.

The exclusion criteria established were the presence in the clinical history record of neuromuscular, metabolism, hormonal and/or cardiovascular disorders.

This study will be carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration to ensure the protection of the rights, safety and welfare of the volunteers that participated in it. Ethical approval of the study will be granted by an Ethical Committee of a public institution [Investigación Provincial de Málaga (Consejería de Salud Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Spain)].

Outcome measures

Expanded Table 1 with reliability, reference and brief description.

Table 1 Study variables list


The measurements will be taken following the anthropometric parameter guidelines of The International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry [54] (ISAK)

  • Weight: the subject would be barefooted and in undergarments.

  • Height: distance from the vertex to the sole of the foot. The subject would be standing, in anatomical position and with the occipital region, back, buttocks and heels in contact with the measuring rod. The subject will take a deep breath at the time of measurement while keeping the head in the Frankfort plane.

Body Mass Index (BMI) is obtained dividing the weight in Kilograms (Kg) by the square of height in metres. It estimates the amount of fat and lean mass of the body.

General health condition using the short form SF-12 questionnaire

General health condition was measured using the SF-12 short form questionnaire, adapted from the extended SF-36 version. Both physical and mental components are evaluated. The higher the score the better the condition. SF-12 reliability has proven a high internal consistency demonstrating an approximate ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient) of 0.9. [55]

POMS (profile of mood states)

The Spanish version of POMS [56], with 44 items that represented six conceptual dimensions: anger (11 items), fatigue (6 items), vigour (5 items), friendship (6 items), stress (7 items) and depressed state (9 items). As usual, the answer format consisted of a 5 ordered category response, assigned with values 0 (nothing) to 4 (a lot). All the items were put forward in the same trend except for the item 29-relaxed (corresponding to the state of stress) scores, that were inverted after the test.


The auto-administrated survey based in 10 dichotomous questions in order to detect elder frail people will be carried out [57].

MMSE (mini-mental state examination) – MEC-30 (mini cognitive examination)

The MEC consists of 30 items grouped into 11 sections, the clinician could carry out in 5–15 min based on the following indications; note that those responsible for carrying out this instrument, both in its original version and its Spanish adaptation [58], warn that the professional should stick to these criteria as far as possible, ensuring maximum objectivity in registering the subject’s responses. The eleven sections are: Orientation to time, Orientation to space, Registration, Attention and Calculation, Memory, Nomination, Repetition (Recall), Comprehension, Reading, Writing and Drawing.

Picture completion test –WAIS III: performance IQ (perception organization index)

This test consists of displaying to the individuals various drawings that lack an important part, which consequently must be named or pointed out within a 20 s time limit [59] The task ends when 5 consecutive faults are committed. The subject is given 1 point per correctly answered item within the time limit. Among the functions involved in this task we distinguish: concentration; perceptual organization; ability to distinguish essential details of the secondary ones; visual recognition of familiar objects; logical reasoning and visual memory. High scores imply: good perception and concentration; good attention to details; ability to carry out and ability to discriminate relevant from irrelevant details. On the other hand, low scores suggest possible anxiety that could affect concentration and concern for unimportant details.

Motor skill memory test

Motor skill memory and body awareness will be measured directing a test that consists of performing ten static positions. The examiner executes 10 positions holding each one of them for 10 s. Immediately after, the patient imitates the position in the opposite way, analogous to a mirror. The test ends when the 10 positions have been carried out. This test is included in the “Memory in movement” program, used as a cognitive intervention tool [60].

Spatial orientation dynamic test-revised

The SODT-R (Spatial Orientation Dynamic Test-Revised) [61] task is to direct two moving objects to a given destination. There are two buttons for each of the moving objects in order to control their course. Pressing the buttons changes the object’s course in one direction, reducing or increasing the angular discrepancy between the current course compared to the ideal course that would stand for 0 deviation.

Hand – grip test

Hand grip strength test will examine the peak of strength and fatigue resistance. The test is performed with the participant in a sitting position and 90 degrees elbow flexion, neutral pronosupination and flexion, extension or inclination of the wrist will not be allowed. The patient will be asked to hand grip, which will be evaluated with a hydraulic dynamometer JAMAR [62].

Expanded timed up and go

Expanded TUG is a test to assess mobility, balance and risk of falls in the elderly [63]. The test consists of timing how long the seated patient takes to get up, walk ten metres, return and sit back again on the chair.

Sample size

To achieve a 80% statistical power to detect differences in the statistical hypothesis testing of the null hypothesis H through a bilateral chi-square test for two independent samples, considering that the significance level is 5%, and based on the studies contained in the Consensus Document on Prevention of Frailty and Falls in the Elderly by the Inter-Territorial Council 2014, a priori it is calculated, based on the outcome variable INTERFRAILTY Q included in one of the trials of such literature, by two means and adding a 15% of the losses (it will be necessary to include 100 subjects in the control group- standard medical practice- and 100 subjects in the experimental group – multimodal intervention program) amounting 200 subjects in the study.

Data collection

The selection of the population that will take part in the study will be chosen through systematic random sampling. The total population consists of the users that belong to the Clinical Management Unit “Tiro de Pichón” medical lists, identified as frail by the nurse’s assessment and that meet the inclusion criteria as described above. The total population will be sorted by alphabetical order. Having determined the sample size, the sampling interval “k” (the skip) will be calculated using the following formula: k = N/n, where “N” is the total population size and “n” is the sample size. We will establish a random number “a” ranging from 1 to “k” that will be the first subject of the study. The remaining sample will be formed by the following elements: a, a + h, a + 2 h, a + 3 h, until the completion of the required sample size (200 subjects) as detailed further. If one of the selected elements wouldn’t be able to take part of the study, the next following element in the initial alphabetically ordered total population listing will be chosen. Figure 1 shows the Flow Diagram is presented from the recruitment to the analysis after the follow-up (12 months).

Fig. 1

Flow Diagram is presented from the recruitment to the analysis after the follow-up (12 months)

Participants will be handed in a patient handout, in which the study’s course will be detailed, and they will be handed in an informed consent, where it will be stated that their enrolment is absolutely voluntary, hence being possible to leave the study when deemed appropriate. Data protection of the participants will be conducted under the following Law: “Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos de Carácter Personal 19/55”.

Control group

The participants in this group will undergo an expository briefing on the importance of performing the exercises and handing in the training schedule in order to strengthen the muscle mass, improve the endurance and reskill balance through working out for 6 months. In addition, a medication review will be taken place and they will be handed in a diet adjustment plan. The data collection along time are the same for both control and experimental groups.

Experimental group

Each one of this group’s participants will undergo the following schedule three times a week every alternative day. It will consist in one specific strength training and another for endurance (sequenced in this order). Before beginning the strength training the participants will carry out two habituating sets to practice the training tests to be performed. After the second habituation session, the 1st RM (maximum repetitions) will be calculated. Each one of them will perform nine exercises: bench press, inclined leg press, seated row, leg extension, back opening, hamstring curl, triceps curl, biceps curl and crunches. These exercises have been chosen to emphasise the synergy between major and smaller muscle groups, as recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine. During the first four weeks, the subjects will perform two series of 18–20 maximum repetitions (RM), shifting to 15–17 RM (weeks 5–9). In weeks 10 to 14, the subjects will perform two series of 15 to 19 RM, shifting to three series of 8–10 RM (weeks 13–16), changing to 6–8 RM (weeks 20–24). The workload per session will be adjusted if the number of repetitions were to be more or less than what was just stated. The recovery time between sets ranged from 90s to 120 s. The estimated time of each strength training session will be 40 min.

An endurance training session will be performed using a cycloergometre and with an intensity relative to the Heart Rate (IRHR). During the first four weeks, the subjects will pedal for 20 min at 80% of their IRHR, moving ahead to 25 min at 85–90% of their IRHR from weeks five to nine. From weeks ten to eighteen, the subjects will cycle for 30 min at 95% of their IRHR and during the last five weeks of training (weeks 20 to 24), the subjects will perform six (6) series of four minutes at 100% of their IRHR, with one minute of active recovery between series.

All training sessions will be carefully supervised by a physiotherapist experienced in therapeutic training. It will be the physiotherapist as well who will conduct the health education during the training sessions. Furthermore, each one of the experimental group patients will undergo a medication review and they will be handed in a diet adjustment plan.

There will be three moments of data collection throughout the intervention: before the intervention, 2 months after the onset and after 6 months. Moreover, there will be a follow-up with two additional measurements: one 3 months and another one 6 months, after the conclusion of the intervention (9 and 12 months from the onset of the intervention, respectively).

The medication review will be focused on the regular, or at least every six months, review of the polypharmacy (intake of more than 5 drugs) insisting on the psychotropic medication due to its greater association to falls and the drugs that can negatively affect people with risk of falling under the STOPP/STAR criteria.

Diet adjustment includes the examination of the variety of nutrients and the protein intake as a protective factor. Anthropometric measurements, weight/height and BMI will be used.

The intervention on the potential hazards at home include conducting the home risk assessment template provided as the Annex 8 of the Consensus document on prevention of frailty and falls in the elderly, and intervening on modifiable elements, obstacles on the floor, mats, cables, lighting type at home, arrangement of the kitchen utensils, bathroom features, type of footwear, clothing and presence of pets.

Team members will reinforce the standard practice by the elements described above in order to improve the condition of frailty.

Statistical analysis

A descriptive analysis of the socio-demographic variables of the participants will be conducted.

In order to analyse the existent differences in the variable values of interest between the control group and the experimental group, Student’s T-Test will be applied for two independent samples in the case that the normality condition could be accepted, which will be verified by the Saphiro-Wilk test. In case if normality couldn’t be accepted, the appropriate nonparametric test of Mann-Whitey will be conducted.

To analyse the existent differences in the response variables prior to and after the intervention, Student’s T-Test will be carried out for paired samples in the case that the condition of normality could be accepted. In any other case, the appropriate nonparametric test of Wilcoxon will be conducted.

Difficulties and limitations of the study

The main difficulty of the study is the possibility that the development of the workout sessions could be performed by a clinical physiotherapist specialized in therapeutic training with an ad hoc contract. As an alternative, the researchers themselves would have to acquire the necessary competences to carry out the workout sessions in coordination with the reference Rehabilitation Team (Fisiotherapy Unit – Clinical Management Unit of “Huelin”, Health District of Málaga).


If the hypothesis is accepted, it should achieve further improvements of the neuromuscular and physiological state in the elderly identified as frail, front the standard medical practice. The interaction of various intervention strategies, wherein a supervised workout program, medication review, diet adjustment and health education are included, will achieve further improvements in the elderly identified as frail. This protocol, if beneficial, could be implemented within public health, after certain requirements are resolved with regard to workout program, medication review, diet adjustment and health education, in order to improve the quality if life and the overall health in frail older adults.

Trial status

This study is open for participant recruitment at the time of submission (enrolling by invitation as of day 1/1/2019).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable as this is a study protocol with no gathered data.



Body Mass Index


Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials


Intensity Relative to the Heart Rate


Maximum Repetitions


Short Physical Perfomance Battery


  1. 1.

    Wolrd Population Prospects. The 2010 Revision Population Database.

  2. 2.

    Zamarrón Cassinello M, Activo E. Infocop. 2007;34:7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Organización Mundial de la Salud: Active Aging. Geneva; 2002.

  4. 4.

    Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia. Lancet. 2019. [Epub ahead of print] Review.

  5. 5.

    World population prospects - population division - United Nations.

  6. 6.

    Instituto de Mayores y Servicios Sociales (IMSERSO): Informe 2006, Las Personas Mayores En España, Datos Estadísticos Estatales Y Por Comunidades Autónomas. 2006th edition.; 2006.

  7. 7.

    Theou O, Cann L, Blodgett J, Wallace LMK, Brothers TD, Rockwood K. Modifications to the frailty phenotype criteria: systematic review of the current literature and investigation of 262 frailty phenotypes in the survey of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;21:78–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Stenholm S, Shardell M, Bandinelli S, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L. Physiological factors contributing to mobility loss over 9 years of follow-up—results from the InCHIANTI study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70:591–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Angevaren M, Aufdemkampe G, Verhaar H, Aleman A. Actividad física y mejoría del estado físico para favorecer la función cognitiva en personas mayores sin deterioro cognitivo comprobado. Oxford: la Biblioteca Cochrane Plus; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Cho B, Scarpace D, Alexander NB. Tests of stepping as indicators of mobility, balance, and fall risk in balance-impaired older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:1168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bolandzadeh N, Kording K, Salowitz N, Davis JC, Hsu L, Chan A, Sharma D, Blohm G, Liu-Ambrose T. Predicting cognitive function from clinical measures of physical function and health status in older adults. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0119075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hildreth KL, Church S. Evaluation and management of the elderly patient presenting with cognitive complaints. Med Clin North Am. 2015;99:311–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cuesta-Vargas AI, Gabel PC. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the upper limb functional index. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cohen AA, Milot E, Li Q, Bergeron P, Poirier R, Dusseault-Bélanger F, Fülöp T, Leroux M, Legault V, Metter EJ, Fried LP, Ferrucci L. Detection of a novel, integrative aging process suggests complex physiological integration. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nicholson JK, Lindon JC. Systems biology: Metabonomics. Nature. 2008;455:1054–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tomlins AM, Foxall PJ, Lynch MJ, Parkinson J, Everett JR, Nicholson JK. High resolution 1H NMR spectroscopic studies on dynamic biochemical processes in incubated human seminal fluid samples. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1379:367–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Decelle EA, Cheng LL. High-resolution magic angle spinning 1H MRS in prostate cancer. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:90–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Giné-Garriga M, Roqué-Fíguls M, Coll-Planas L, Sitjà-Rabert M, Salvà A. Physical exercise interventions for improving performance-based measures of physical function in community-dwelling, frail older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:753–769.e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    VanSwearingen JM, Studenski SA. Aging, motor skill, and the energy cost of walking: implications for the prevention and treatment of mobility decline in older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:1429–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, Holliday PJ, Wood-Dauphinee SL. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:1073–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shumway-Cook A, Guralnik JM, Phillips CL, Coppin AK, Ciol MA, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L. Age-associated declines in complex walking task performance: the walking InCHIANTI toolkit. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bidargaddi N, Klingbeil L, Sarela A, Boyle J, Cheung V, Yelland C, Karunanithi M, Gray L. Wavelet based approach for posture transition estimation using a waist worn accelerometer. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:1884–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Botolfsen P, Helbostad JL, Moe-Nilssen R, Wall JC. Reliability and concurrent validity of the expanded timed up-and-go test in older people with impaired mobility. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13:94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Galán-Mercant A, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Differences in trunk Accelerometry between frail and nonfrail elderly persons in sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transitions based on a Mobile inertial sensor. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 2013;1:e21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Galán-Mercant A, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Differences in trunk kinematic between frail and nonfrail elderly persons during turn transition based on a smartphone inertial sensor. Biomed Res Int. 2013:279197.

  26. 26.

    Galán-Mercant A, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Differences in trunk accelerometry between frail and non-frail elderly persons in functional tasks. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ganea R, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Salarian A, Büla C, Martin E, Rochat S, Hoskovec C, Piot-Ziegler C, Aminian K. Kinematics and dynamic complexity of postural transitions in frail elderly subjects. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:6118–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ganea R, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Büla C, Rochat S, Aminian K. Multi-parametric evaluation of sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transitions in elderly people. Med Eng Phys. 2011;33:1086–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Greene BR, Doheny EP, O’Halloran A, Anne Kenny R. Frailty status can be accurately assessed using inertial sensors and the TUG test. Age Ageing. 2014;43:406–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Higashi Y, Yamakoshi K, Fujimoto T, Sekine M, Tamura T. Quantitative evaluation of movement using the timed up-and-go test. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine. 2008;27:38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Janssen WGM, Külcü DG, Horemans HLD, Stam HJ, Bussmann JBJ. Sensitivity of accelerometry to assess balance control during sit-to-stand movement. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008;16:479–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Marschollek M, Nemitz G, Gietzelt M, Wolf KH, Meyer Zu Schwabedissen H, Haux R. Predicting in-patient falls in a geriatric clinic: a clinical study combining assessment data and simple sensory gait measurements. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2009;42:317–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Martínez-Ramírez A, Lecumberri P, Gómez M, Rodriguez-Mañas L, García FJ, Izquierdo M. Frailty assessment based on wavelet analysis during quiet standing balance test. J Biomech. 2011;44:2213–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Moe-Nilssen R, Helbostad JL. Estimation of gait cycle characteristics by trunk accelerometry. J Biomech. 2004;37:121–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Moe-Nilssen R, Helbostad JL. Interstride trunk acceleration variability but not step width variability can differentiate between fit and frail older adults. Gait Posture. 2005;21:164–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Najafi B, Aminian K, Loew F, Blanc Y, Robert PA. Measurement of stand-sit and sit-stand transitions using a miniature gyroscope and its application in fall risk evaluation in the elderly. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002;49:843–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Salarian A, Zampieri C, Horak FB, Carlson-Kuhta P, Nutt JG, Aminian K. Analyzing 180° turns using an inertial system reveals early signs of progress in Parkinson’s disease. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:224–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Salarian A, Horak FB, Zampieri C, Carlson-Kuhta P, Nutt JG, Aminian K. iTUG, a sensitive and reliable measure of mobility. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010;18:303–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Weiss A, Herman T, Plotnik M, Brozgol M, Maidan I, Giladi N, Gurevich T, Hausdorff JM. Can an accelerometer enhance the utility of the timed up & go test when evaluating patients with Parkinson’s disease? Med Eng Phys. 2010;32:119–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Weiss A, Herman T, Plotnik M, Brozgol M, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. An instrumented timed up and go: the added value of an accelerometer for identifying fall risk in idiopathic fallers. Physiol Meas. 2011;32:2003–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zampieri C, Salarian A, Carlson-Kuhta P, Aminian K, Nutt JG, Horak FB. The instrumented timed up and go test: potential outcome measure for disease modifying therapies in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:171–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zampieri C, Salarian A, Carlson-Kuhta P, Nutt JG, Horak FB. Assessing mobility at home in people with early Parkinson’s disease using an instrumented timed up and go test. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2011;17:277–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Galán-Mercant A, Barón-López FJ, Labajos-Manzanares MT, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Reliability and criterion-related validity with a smartphone used in timed-up-and-go test. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Cuesta-Vargas AI, Galán-Mercant A, Williams JM. The use of inertial sensors system for human motion analysis. Phys Ther Rev. 2010;15:462–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Shaw M, Adam CJ, Izatt MT, Licina P, Askin GN. Use of the iPhone for cobb angle measurement in scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2011.

  46. 46.

    Xia Y, Cheung V, Garcia E, Ding H, Karunaithi M. Development of an automated physical activity classification application for mobile phones. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;168:188–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sun B, Wang Y, Banda J. Gait characteristic analysis and identification based on the iPhone’s accelerometer and gyrometer. Sensors (Basel). 2014;14:17037–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Misic MM, Rosengren KS, Woods JA, Evans EM. Muscle quality, aerobic fitness and fat mass predict lower-extremity physical function in community-dwelling older adults. Gerontology. 2007;53:260–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Reeves ND, Narici MV, Maganaris CN. Effect of resistance training on skeletal muscle-specific force in elderly humans. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96:885–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Cadore EL, Pinto RS, Pinto SS, Alberton CL, Correa CS, Tartaruga MP, Silva EM, Almeida APV, Trindade GT, Kruel LFM. Effects of strength, endurance, and concurrent training on aerobic power and dynamic neuromuscular economy in elderly men. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:758–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Cadore EL, Pinto RS, Bottaro M, Izquierdo M. Strength and endurance training prescription in healthy and frail elderly. Aging Dis. 2014;5:183–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bell GJ, Syrotuik D, Martin TP, Burnham R, Quinney HA. Effect of concurrent strength and endurance training on skeletal muscle properties and hormone concentrations in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;81:418–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Cabrero-García J, Muñoz-Mendoza CL, Cabañero-Martínez MJ, González-Llopís L, Ramos-Pichardo JD, Reig-Ferrer A. Valores de referencia de la Short Physical Performance Battery para pacientes de 70 y más años en atención primaria de salud. Atención Primaria. 2012;44:540–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ross W, Hebbelinck M, Faulkner R. Kinantropometry terminology and landmarks. in Shepard R, and Lavalle H. physical fitness Asessment. Charles tomas. Sprinfield: 1978.

  55. 55.

    Vigalut G, Valderas JM, Ferrer M, Lopez-Garcia E, Garin O, Alonso J. Interpretation of sf36 and sf12 questionnaires in Spain: physical and mental components. Med Clin. 2008;130(19):726–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Andrade E, Arce C, Torrado J, Garrido J, De Francisco y Arce I. Factor structure and invariance of the POMS mood state questionnaire in Spanish. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 2010 13, 444–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Di Bari M, Profili F, Bandinelli S, Salvioni A, Mossello E, Corridori C, Francesconi P. Screening for frailty in older adults using a postal questionnaire: rationale, methods, and instruments validation of the INTER- FRAIL study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(10):1933–7 5p.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lobo A, Saz P, Marcos G, Grupo de Trabajo ZARADEMP. MMSE: Examen Cognoscitivo Mini-Mental Madrid: TEA Ediciones;2002.

  59. 59.

    Wechsler, D. Escala de inteligencia de Wechsler para adultos-IV. Manual de aplicación y corrección. Madrid: NCS Pearson, Inc. Edición original, 2008.

  60. 60.

    Rey Cao A, Canales Lacruz I, Táboas País I, Cancela Carra JM «Memoria en movimiento» programa de estimulación cognitiva a través de la motricidad para personas mayores de la obra social Caixa Galicia. retrieved May 30, 2019 from

  61. 61.

    Colom R, Contreras MJ, Shih PC Santacreu J. The assessment of spatial ability through a single computerized test. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2003;19(2):92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Bellace JV, Healy D, Besser MP, Byron T, Hohman L. Validity of the Dexter evaluation System’s Jamar dynamometer attachment for assessment of hand grip strength in a normal population. J Hand Ther: Official J Am Soc Hand Ther. 2000;13(1):46–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “up & go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable as this is a study protocol.


This research project was partially funded by 536/2016 Chartered of Physiotherapy and AP2018-IBIMA DSGM8–001.

Author information




AIC-V, JJBB, EDC, MMRG and GON have made a contribution to the conception of this study. AIC-V, JJBB, MMRG, GON and MGS made substantial contributions to protocol design and drafted the manuscript. All the authors have given final approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration to ensure the protection of the rights, safety and welfare of the volunteers that participated in it. Ethical approval of the study is granted by an Ethical Committee of a public institution [Investigación Provincial de Málaga (Consejería de Salud Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Spain)]. Written informed consent is obtained from each individual.

Consent for publication

Not applicable as this is a study protocol with no gathered data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

González-Sánchez, M., Cuesta-Vargas, A.I., del Mar Rodríguez González, M. et al. Effectiveness of a muticomponent workout program integrated in an evidence based multimodal program in hyperfrail elderly patients: POWERAGING randomized clinical trial protocol. BMC Geriatr 19, 171 (2019).

Download citation


  • Frailty
  • Physical activity
  • Physical fitness
  • Falls
  • Diet
  • Elderly