Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

How to explore the needs of informal caregivers of individuals with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease or related diseases? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies

BMC Geriatrics volume 17, Article number: 86 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study aims to review the methodologies used to identify the needs, the existing needs assessment instruments and the main topics of needs explored among caregivers of patients with mild cognitive impairment to dementia.

Methods

MEDLINE, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library and Web of science were searched from January 1980 to January 2017. Research studies in English or French were eligible for inclusion if they fulfilled the following criteria: quantitative, qualitative and mixed method studies that used instrument, focus group or semi-structured interviews to assess the informal caregiver’s needs in terms of information, coping skills, support and service.

Results

Seventy studies (n = 39 quantitative studies, n = 25 qualitative studies and n = 6 mixed method studies) met the inclusion criteria and were included. Thirty-six quantitative instruments were identified but only one has been validated for the needs assessment of dementia caregivers: the Carer’s Needs Assessment for Dementia (CNA-D). The main areas of needs explored in these instruments were: information, psychosocial, social, psychoeducational and other needs.

Conclusions

No instrument has been developed and validated to assess the needs of informal caregivers of patients with cognitive impairment, whatever the stage and the etiology of the disease. As the perceived needs of caregivers may evolve with the progression of the disease and the dementia transition, their needs should be regularly assessed.

Peer Review reports

Background

The informal caregiver of people with cognitive impairment is often a spouse or a child, providing supervision, support and assistance with daily living activities during all stages of the disease to maintain the care recipient at home [1]. Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) ranges from 3 to 19% in adults older than 65 years [2]. In addition, the number of people with dementia in the world is expected to rise from 35.6 million in 2010 to an estimated 115.4 million in 2050 [3]. This will be associated with an increasing number of informal caregivers whose role represents a major societal and economic issue [4, 5].

Cognitive impairment, progressive loss of autonomy and behavioural disorders associated with the evolution of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Diseases (ADRD) may lead to increased caregiver burden [6, 7]. This burden may have physical, psychological, emotional, social and financial impact on the informal caregiver [8]. Several studies have shown that caring for people with dementia was associated with depression, anxiety, greater risk of hypertension and heart disease, decreased immunity and higher mortality [9–13].

The increasing frailty of the caregiver has been shown to predict an early institutionalization of the patient over time [14]. Despite caregivers of people with dementia often providing intensive levels of assistance, their use of support services is low. A review showed that one third of caregivers did not use any service and one fourth caregivers used only one service [15]. In addition, previous studies have shown a large number of unmet needs were correlated with a higher burden and an increase in caregiver strain and depressive symptoms [16–23]. To ensure the service utilization by the caregivers and to minimize their burden, the supply (support, services) and the demand (caregivers’ needs) must be appropriate. Indeed, informal caregivers and professionals may differ in their perspectives to assess caregivers’ needs and in prioritising subsequent interventions and supports [24]. The assessment of the caregivers’ met and unmet needs represent a first step (i) to determine services or care plans for community-based programs and planning service delivery [25] (policy purposes); (ii) to refer caregivers to appropriate support and resources based on gaps-in needs identified and to ensure the service utilization (clinical purposes); and (iii) to design research programs for the caregivers (research purposes). This assessment can also be used when carrying out trials of interventions intended to improve caregiver outcomes including reducing unmet needs (Research purposes). Our research questions are: How to explore the caregivers’ needs of individuals with cognitive impairment and what methods are used?

A previous systematic review conducted in 2012, has provided an overview of the existing needs assessment instruments among people with cognitive impairment [26], but no such studies have been conducted considering the need assessment of their informal caregivers.

Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the methodologies used to identify the needs, the existing needs assessment instruments and the main topics of needs explored among caregivers of ADRD patients with mild cognitive impairment to dementia.

Methods

Search procedure/methods

Electronic databases and key articles were searched for studies published in English and French between January 1980 and January 2017. The searches were carried out in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science in order to identify quantitative and qualitative studies. We used the following search strategies for the research (detailed in Additional file 1): (carer*/ caregiver*/ loved one*/ famil*) AND (dementia/ Alzheimer*/ frontotemporal/ lewy/ vascular dementia/ cognitive impairment/ memory) AND (need*/ expectation*) AND (quantitative*/ qualitative*/ questionnaire*/ item*/ scale*/ tool*/ instrument*/ interview*/ cross-sectional/ focus group*/ structured/ verbatim* / survey). A manual search was performed at the end from the references of the included studies, from google scholar and using the ‘Related articles’ option on PubMed. The reference database used to retrieve records and for the screening was Endnote. This systematic review follows the PRISMA statement guidelines [27].

Eligibility criteria

We included quantitative and qualitative studies that used questionnaires, instruments, focus group or semi-structured interviews to assess the needs (met and unmet needs) of informal caregivers. Informal caregivers were defined as unpaid, non-professionals who daily take care of individuals with mild cognitive impairment to dementia related to ADRD [1]. The included studies had to explore caregiver’s needs in terms of information, coping skills, support and services. We also included studies that used both quantitative and qualitative methods (mixed methods studies).

Study selection

Two authors (T.N and C.M) independently screened the titles and abstracts of the citations identified by the search to determine which papers met the eligibility criteria. The final eligibility evaluation was performed utilizing the full paper. In cases with disagreements, discussions were held between authors until a consensus reached.

Data collection

One review author (T.N) extracted the data using a data extraction form, and a second author (C.M) verified the data. The following data were extracted: year of publication, country in which the study was performed, first author, number and main characteristics of caregivers (proportion of females and spouses and the mean age), the care recipient health condition, the instrument aim, and the main characteristics of the needs assessment method.

Results

Selection of study

A total of 8265 studies were identified through database searching. A flow-chart of the selection process is illustrated in Fig. 1. We excluded 8080 studies including 2631 duplicates and 5450 articles after screening of the title and abstract. The remaining 185 full text articles were screened independently and five additional studies were identified by the authors from the references of the included studies. A total of 70 studies were included.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Systematic review flow-chart: selection of studies

Full size image

Study populations

A total of 11,122 informal caregivers was captured in the included studies: n = 9390 in quantitative studies, n = 1294 in qualitative studies, and n = 438 in mixed method studies (Tables 1, 2 and 3). In these studies, the caregiver needs assessment was performed according to the patient diagnosis in 19 studies, the stage of the disease in 45 studies or both in six studies. Nineteen studies were conducted among caregivers of Alzheimer’s Disease patients, four in Frontotemporal dementia, two in Lewy Body disease, one in vascular dementia and one in ADRD (diagnosis unspecified). The stage of the disease the most explored in the caregiver needs assessment was dementia: 38 studies with dementia caregivers and seven with early-onset dementia caregivers. Only four studies were conducted among MCI caregivers.

Table 1 Methodological characteristics of the included quantitative studies
Full size table
Table 2 Methodological characteristics of the included qualitative studies
Full size table
Table 3 Methodological characteristics of the included mixed method studies
Full size table

Methodologies to identify the needs of informal caregivers

The sample of selected studies was composed of 39 quantitative studies, 25 qualitative studies and six mixed method studies. Tables 1, 2 and 3 summarize the methodology characteristics of the studies (quantitative, qualitative and mixed research).

Quantitative studies

A majority of the needs assessment instruments were especially developed for the research (28/39 studies) (Table 1). Eleven studies have used validated instruments developed for the research or clinical use to assess the needs of elderly caregivers (6/11), dementia patient and caregivers (2/11), dementia caregivers (2/11) and nonspecific caregivers (1/11). Some of the validated instruments developed to assess the needs of patients with dementia, such as the Camberwell Assessment of Needs for the Elderly (CANE) [28], The Johns Hopkins Dementia Care Needs Assessment (JHDCNA) by Black et al. and the Care needs assessment pack for dementia (CarenapD) [29], include several questions concerning the caregivers’ needs. Only one valid and reliable instrument was identified to specifically assess the dementia caregivers’ needs: the Carers’ Needs Assessment for Dementia (CNA-D) [16]. They used focus groups and in-depth interviews with both caregivers and experts, along with a literature search, to design this assessment tool. This semi-structured research interview included 18 problem areas. For each problem area, several possible interventions are proposed: individual psychoeducation, psychoeducational group, self-help group for family members, printed information material, and other intervention. A second instrument called Partnering for Better Health - Living with Chronic Illness: Dementia (PBH-LCI:D) was used to evaluate the acquired knowledge and skills allowing to indirectly assess the dementia caregiver’s needs [30]. This instrument with 35 items was not specifically developed to needs assessment. It explored the acquired knowledge and skills allowing to indirectly assess the dementia caregiver’s needs.

Qualitative studies

Several methodologies were used to identify the needs of informal caregivers: semi-structured interviews (10/25 studies), focus group (6/25 studies), survey with open-ended questions (1/25 studies), case study (1/25) and mixed qualitative methods as semi-structured interviews/focus group (6/25 studies) or open-ended survey/focus group (1/25 studies) (Table 2). The main objectives of these qualitative studies were to explore the experiences of caregivers with caring and community services, their information, training and support needs, their satisfaction with services and the gap between their perceived needs and the proposed services.

Mixed method studies

Six studies including quantitative and qualitative methodologies were conducted among informal caregivers (Table 3). The majority of the studies consisted of quantitative survey associated with a semi-structured interview to explore the caregiver’s experience and needs or to complete and to comment the quantitative data. The quantitative instruments were either developed for the study, or derived from validated instrument for nonspecific caregivers.

Main topics of needs explored in the quantitative and mixed method studies

From the 45 studies using quantitative methods (39 quantitative and six mixed methods research), 36 instruments were described (wholly or in part), four studies used the same validated instruments (CANE or JHDCNA) and four were not described. Table 4 summarizes the main items of needs explored among the different instruments. Twenty-seven items were related to five areas of needs: information (e.g. on the disease and the treatment) psychological (e.g. emotional support for caregivers and their relative), social (e.g. financial issue and community services), psychoeducational (e.g. coping skills and caregiver training) and other needs (e.g. medication management and environment safety). The most explored topics of needs (≥50%) in caregiver needs assessment instruments were: information on the disease (78%), support for the caregivers (64%), coping for caring (56%), community services related to patient care (50%), financial issue (50%) and safety/supervision (50%).

Table 4 Main topics of needs explored in instruments of the included studies
Full size table

Discussion

This article provides the first overview of existing needs assessments methods in caregivers of individuals with ADRD developed for clinical or research use. Despite the large number of studies include in the analysis, only one instrument was validated to assess the needs of dementia caregivers: the Carers’ Needs Assessment for Dementia (CNA-D) [16]. No validated instrument was found for the caregivers of individuals with ADRD in the others stages of the disease progression. Moreover, no quantitative nor qualitative study has assessed the needs of caregivers of individuals with preclinical symptoms of ADRD. The caregivers’ needs identification was often performed in the dementia area in comparison with the MCI area (39 studies versus four studies). Similarly, few studies were conducted among frontotemporal dementia, vascular dementia and Lewy Body disease caregivers (6 studies) compared to Alzheimer’s disease caregivers (19 studies).

Many quantitative instruments were used in research area to develop programs and interventions tailored to the caregivers’ needs or in clinical area to identify their needs and to offer them appropriate support. Caregivers’ needs for services or care plans and referring to support were included in many developed instruments. The items of corresponding needs were as follows: psychological and emotional support (64%), information about financial and legal issues (50 and 39%), information about respite and day care (39%) and community services related to patient care (50%) and home support (42%). Despite the diversity of the items present in the identified instruments, they allow to explore a larger number of topics such as information, skills, support and service needs, compared with qualitative methods. However, qualitative research produces large amounts of textual data in the form of transcripts and observational field notes about a predetermined topic [31]. Qualitative research methods have used in the social sciences and deserve to be an essential component in health and health services research. They allow exploring individually or in groups the perceived needs of caregivers. Unlike quantitative methods, qualitative methods allow to explore in depth specific needs (e.g. needs in an ethnic population, needs of interactions with physician and care providers, changing needs before, during and after diagnosis) and experiences of caregivers (e.g. experiences with support and services). Understanding these challenges may lead to improve the health care provision for informal caregivers. Thus, qualitative and quantitative approaches are complementary: qualitative work may be conducted as a preliminary to quantitative research, used to supplement quantitative work or used to explore complex phenomena or areas not amenable to quantitative research [32].

The caregiver plays a crucial role across all stages of the progression and identifying their needs should be performed by the health professionals at each stage to prevent or reduce their burden. Many studies have assessed the effectiveness of interventions on caregiver burden and psychological disorders [33–36]. The meta-analysis of Pinquart et al. including 127 interventions showed a significant but small effects on burden, depression, subjective well-being, and knowledge and/or coping abilities of the caregiver [34]. There is a lack of systematic investigations of the efficacy of treatment combinations using a needs assessment in caregivers of individuals with subjective cognitive impairment, MCI or dementia. To our knowledge no study has shown that caregivers receive the interventions matching their needs assessed as outcome with a validated instrument.

This current review has some limitations. The main restrictions concerned the searching process. Only studies published in scientific journals were included in the systematic review. The needs assessments of caregivers of individuals with cognitive impairment published in the “grey literature” were not explored. The searching process was also limited to a number of databases which covered both the clinical and psychosocial aspects of the study. Another limitation in the analysis of the different needs assessment instruments since the topic of explored needs were not always fully described in the included studies.

Conclusion

To reduce the caregiver burden and to facilitate the patient’s home care, policymakers, service planners, health professionals and researchers must understand the needs of this growing population. This systematic review highlights the necessity to develop a validated instrument to assess the met and unmet needs of informal caregivers of patients with a cognitive impairment across all stages of the disease progression and whatever the etiology. As the perceived needs of caregivers may evolve with the progression of the disease and the dementia transition, the needs should be regularly assessed and taking into account the needs for information, coping skills, support and service.

References

  1. Brodaty H, Donkin M. Family caregivers of people with dementia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(2):217–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gauthier S, Reisberg B, Zaudig M, Petersen RC, Ritchie K, Broich K, et al. Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet Lond Engl. 2006;367(9518):1262–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alzheimer’s Disease International. The World Alzheimer Report 2010: The Global Economic Impact of Dementia. [Internet]. London; 2010. Disponible sur: http://www.alz.org/documents/national/world_alzheimer_report_2010.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2016.

  4. Joling KJ, Schöpe J, van Hout HPJ, van Marwijk HWJ, van der Horst HE, Bosmans JE. Predictors of Societal Costs in Dementia Patients and Their Informal Caregivers: A Two-Year Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;23:1193–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. König H-H, Leicht H, Brettschneider C, Bachmann C, Bickel H, Fuchs A, et al. The costs of dementia from the societal perspective: is care provided in the community really cheaper than nursing home care? J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(2):117–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dauphinot V, Delphin-Combe F, Mouchoux C, Dorey A, Bathsavanis A, Makaroff Z, et al. Risk factors of caregiver burden among patients with Alzheimer’s disease or related disorders: a cross-sectional study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44(3):907–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dauphinot V, Ravier A, Novais T, Delphin-Combe F, Moutet C, Xie J, et al. Relationship Between Comorbidities in Patients With Cognitive Complaint and Caregiver Burden: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(3):232–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. The Gerontologist. 1980;20(6):649–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schulz R, O’Brien AT, Bookwala J, Fleissner K. Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of dementia caregiving: prevalence, correlates, and causes. The Gerontologist. 1995;35(6):771–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper C, Balamurali TBS, Livingston G. A systematic review of the prevalence and covariates of anxiety in caregivers of people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2007;19(2):175–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. von Känel R, Mausbach BT, Patterson TL, Dimsdale JE, Aschbacher K, Mills PJ, et al. Increased Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Risk Score in dementia caregivers relative to non-caregiving controls. Gerontology. 2008;54(3):131–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Dura JR, Speicher CE, Trask OJ, Glaser R. Spousal caregivers of dementia victims: longitudinal changes in immunity and health. Psychosom Med. 1991;53(4):345–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schulz R, Beach SR. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA. 1999;282(23):2215–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yaffe K, Fox P, Newcomer R, Sands L, Lindquist K, Dane K, et al. Patient and caregiver characteristics and nursing home placement in patients with dementia. JAMA. 2002;287(16):2090–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brodaty H, Thomson C, Thompson C, Fine M. Why caregivers of people with dementia and memory loss don’t use services. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;20(6):537–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wancata J, Krautgartner M, Berner J, Alexandrowicz R, Unger A, Kaiser G, et al. The Carers’ Needs Assessment for Dementia (CNA-D): development, validity and reliability. Int Psychogeriatr. 2005;17(3):393–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosa E, Lussignoli G, Sabbatini F, Chiappa A, Di Cesare S, Lamanna L, et al. Needs of caregivers of the patients with dementia. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;51(1):54–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Roest HG, Meiland FJM, Comijs HC, Derksen E, Jansen APD, van Hout HPJ, et al. What do community-dwelling people with dementia need? A survey of those who are known to care and welfare services. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(5):949–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dello Buono M, Busato R, Mazzetto M, Paccagnella B, Aleotti F, Zanetti O, et al. Community care for patients with Alzheimer’s disease and non-demented elderly people: use and satisfaction with services and unmet needs in family caregivers. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999;14(11):915–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Black BS, Johnston D, Rabins PV, Morrison A, Lyketsos C, Samus QM. Unmet needs of community-residing persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: findings from the maximizing independence at home study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(12):2087–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryan KA, Weldon A, Huby NM, Persad C, Bhaumik AK, Heidebrink JL, et al. Caregiver support service needs for patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2010;24(2):171–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosness TA, Haugen PK, Gausdal M, Gjøra L, Engedal K. Carers of patients with early-onset dementia, their burden and needs: a pilot study using a new questionnaire--care-EOD. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;27(10):1095–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jennings LA, Reuben DB, Evertson LC, Serrano KS, Ercoli L, Grill J, et al. Unmet needs of caregivers of individuals referred to a dementia care program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(2):282–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Steiner V, Pierce LL, Salvador D. Information Needs of Family Caregivers of People With Dementia. Rehabil Nurs J. 2016;41(3):162–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eifert E, Eddy J. The role of needs assessments in enhancing support service utilization by family caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Health Stud. 2012;27(4):227.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schmid R, Eschen A, Rüegger-Frey B, Martin M. Instruments for comprehensive needs assessment in individuals with cognitive complaints, mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;27(4):329–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Reynolds T, Thornicroft G, Abas M, Woods B, Hoe J, Leese M, et al. Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE). Development, validity and reliability. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci. 2000;176:444–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McWalter G, Toner H, McWalter A, Eastwood J, Marshall M, Turvey T. A community needs assessment: the care needs assessment pack for dementia (CarenapD)--its development, reliability and validity. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1998;13(1):16–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sadak T, Korpak A, Borson S. Measuring caregiver activation for health care: Validation of PBH-LCI:D. Geriatr Nurs. 2015;36(4):284–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;320(7227):114–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311(6996):42–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sörensen S, Pinquart M, Duberstein P. How effective are interventions with caregivers? An updated meta-analysis. The Gerontologist. 2002;42(3):356–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Helping caregivers of persons with dementia: which interventions work and how large are their effects? Int Psychogeriatr. 2006;18(4):577–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Selwood A, Johnston K, Katona C, Lyketsos C, Livingston G. Systematic review of the effect of psychological interventions on family caregivers of people with dementia. J Affect Disord. 2007;101(1-3):75–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Thompson CA, Spilsbury K, Hall J, Birks Y, Barnes C, Adamson J. Systematic review of information and support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia. BMC Geriatr. 2007;7:18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Aminzadeh F, Byszewski A, Dalziel WB, Wilson M, Deane N, Papahariss-Wright S. Effectiveness of outpatient geriatric assessment programs: exploring caregiver needs, goals, and outcomes. J Gerontol Nurs. 2005;31(12):19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Johnston D, Samus QM, Morrison A, Leoutsakos JS, Hicks K, Handel S, et al. Identification of community-residing individuals with dementia and their unmet needs for care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;26(3):292–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Black BS, Johnston D, Morrison A, Rabins PV, Lyketsos CG, Samus QM. Quality of life of community-residing persons with dementia based on self-rated and caregiver-rated measures. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(8):1379–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wackerbarth SB, Johnson MMS. Essential information and support needs of family caregivers. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;47(2):95–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Simonton L. Assessing Caregiver Information Needs. J Gerontol Soc Work. 1987;10(1-2):177–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fortinsky RH, Hathaway TJ. Information and service needs among active and former family caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease. The Gerontologist. 1990;30(5):604–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Francis GM, Munjas BA. Needs of family caregivers and persons with Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 1992;7(4):23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. George LK, Fillenbaum GG. OARS methodology. A decade of experience in geriatric assessment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33(9):607–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bowd AD, Loos CH. Needs, morale and coping strategies of caregivers for persons with Alzheimer’s disease in isolated communities in Canada. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 1996;11(3):32–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Edelman P, Kuhn D, Fulton BR, Kyrouac GA. Information and service needs of persons with Alzheimer’s disease and their family caregivers living in rural communities. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2006;21(4):226–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Raivio M, Eloniemi-Sulkava U, Laakkonen M-L, Saarenheimo M, Pietilä M, Tilvis R, et al. How do officially organized services meet the needs of elderly caregivers and their spouses with Alzheimer’s disease? Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2007;22(5):360–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Coudin G, Mollard J. Difficulties, coping strategies and satisfactions in family caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s disease. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2011;9(3):363–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. McKee K, Spazzafumo L, Nolan M, Wojszel B, Lamura G, Bien B. Components of the difficulties, satisfactions and management strategies of carers of older people: a principal component analysis of CADI-CASI-CAMI. Aging Ment Health. 2009;13(2):255–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Amieva H, Rullier L, Bouisson J, Dartigues J-F, Dubois O, Salamon R. Needs and expectations of Alzheimer’s disease family caregivers. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2012;60(3):231–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Laprise R, Dufort F, Lavoie F. Construction et validation d’une echelle d’attentes en matiere de consultation aupres d’aidant (e) s de personnes agees. Can J Aging. 2001;20(02):211–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chow TW, Pio FJ, Rockwood K. An international needs assessment of caregivers for frontotemporal dementia. Can J Neurol Sci. 2011;38(5):753–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Diehl-Schmid J, Schmidt E-M, Nunnemann S, Riedl L, Kurz A, Förstl H, et al. Caregiver burden and needs in frontotemporal dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2013;26(4):221–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Nicolaou PL, Egan SJ, Gasson N, Kane RT. Identifying needs, burden, and distress of carers of people with Frontotemporal dementia compared to Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia. 2010;9(2):215–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. van der Roest HG, Meiland FJM, van Hout HPJ, Jonker C, Dröes R-M. Validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly in community-dwelling people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008;20(6):1273–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Galvin JE, Duda JE, Kaufer DI, Lippa CF, Taylor A, Zarit SH. Lewy body dementia: caregiver burden and unmet needs. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2010;24(2):177–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Killen A, Flynn D, De Brún A, O’Brien N, O’Brien J, Thomas AJ, et al. Support and information needs following a diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;28(3):495–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. England M. Expressed Information and Resource Needs of Filial Caregivers Reporting Recent Experiences of Crisis. Educ Gerontol. 2001;27(2):139–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gibson AK, Anderson KA, Acocks S. Exploring the service and support needs of families with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2014;29(7):596–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Philp I, McKee KJ, Meldrum P, Ballinger BR, Gilhooly ML, Gordon DS, et al. Community care for demented and non-demented elderly people: a comparison study of financial burden, service use, and unmet needs in family supporters. BMJ. 1995;310(6993):1503–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Turner SA, Street HP. Assessing carers’ training needs: A pilot inquiry. Aging Ment Health. 1999;3(2):173–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gaugler JE, Anderson KA, Leach MSWCR, Smith CD, Schmitt FA, Mendiondo M. The emotional ramifications of unmet need in dementia caregiving. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2004;19(6):369–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Orrell M, Hancock GA, Liyanage KCG, Woods B, Challis D, Hoe J. The needs of people with dementia in care homes: the perspectives of users, staff and family caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008;20(5):941–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Selwood A, Cooper C, Owens C, Blanchard M, Livingston G. What would help me stop abusing? The family carer’s perspective. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(2):309–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Nichols LO, Martindale-Adams J, Greene WA, Burns R, Graney MJ, Lummus A. Dementia Caregivers’ Most Pressing Concerns. Clin Gerontol. 2008;32(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Peeters JM, Van Beek AP, Meerveld JH, Spreeuwenberg PM, Francke AL. Informal caregivers of persons with dementia, their use of and needs for specific professional support: a survey of the National Dementia Programme. BMC Nurs. 2010;9:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Koenig KN, Steiner V, Pierce LL. Information needs of family caregivers of persons with cognitive versus physical deficits. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2011;32(4):396–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Li H. Unmet service needs: a comparison between dementia and non-dementia caregivers. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2012;31(1):41–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Miranda-Castillo C, Woods B, Orrell M. The needs of people with dementia living at home from user, caregiver and professional perspectives: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Zwaanswijk M, Peeters JM, van Beek AP, Meerveld JH, Francke AL. Informal caregivers of people with dementia: problems, needs and support in the initial stage and in subsequent stages of dementia: a questionnaire survey. Open Nurs J. 2013;7:6–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Beisecker AE, Chrisman SK, Wright LJ. Perceptions of family caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease: Communication with physicians. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 1997;12(2):73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Loukissa D, Farran CJ, Graham KL. Caring for a relative with Alzheimer’s disease: The experience of African-American and Caucasian caregivers. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 1999;14(4):207–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Smith AL, Lauret R, Peery A, Mueller T. Caregiver Needs. Clin Gerontol. 2001;24(1-2):3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Farran CJ, Loukissa D, Perraud S, Paun O. Alzheimer’s disease caregiving information and skills. Part I: care recipient issues and concerns. Res Nurs Health. 2003;26(5):366–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Farran CJ, Loukissa D, Perraud S, Paun O. Alzheimer’s disease caregiving information and skills. Part II: family caregiver issues and concerns. Res Nurs Health. 2004;27(1):40–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Nichols KR, Fam D, Cook C, Pearce M, Elliot G, Baago S, et al. When dementia is in the house: needs assessment survey for young caregivers. Can J Neurol Sci. 2013;40(1):21–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Bakker C, de Vugt ME, Vernooij-Dassen M, van Vliet D, Verhey FRJ, Koopmans RTCM. Needs in early onset dementia: A qualitative case from the NeedYD study. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2010;25(8):634–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Millenaar JK, van Vliet D, Bakker C, Vernooij-Dassen MJFJ, Koopmans RTCM, Verhey FRJ, et al. The experiences and needs of children living with a parent with young onset dementia: results from the NeedYD study. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26(12):2001–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Boots LMM, Wolfs CAG, Verhey FRJ, Kempen GIJM, de Vugt ME. Qualitative study on needs and wishes of early-stage dementia caregivers: the paradox between needing and accepting help. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27(6):927–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Wawrziczny E, Pasquier F, Ducharme F, Kergoat M-J, Antoine P. Do spouse caregivers of young and older persons with dementia have different needs? A comparative study. Psychogeriatrics. 2017. In press.

  81. Bråne G. Normal aging and dementia disorders—coping and crisis in the family. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1986;10(3-5):287–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Lampley-Dallas VT, Mold JW, Flori DE. Perceived needs of African-American caregivers of elders with dementia. J Natl Med Assoc. 2001;93(2):47–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Shaji KS, Smitha K, Lal KP, Prince MJ. Caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s disease: a qualitative study from the Indian 10/66 Dementia Research Network. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;18(1):1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Innes A, Blackstock K, Mason A, Smith A, Cox S. Dementia care provision in rural Scotland: service users’ and carers’ experiences. Health Soc Care Community. 2005;13(4):354–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. de Jong JD, Boersma F. Dutch psychogeriatric day-care centers: a qualitative study of the needs and wishes of carers. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(2):268–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Shanley C, Russell C, Middleton H, Simpson-Young V. Living through end-stage dementia: The experiences and expressed needs of family carers. Dementia. 2011;10(3):325–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Samia LW, Hepburn K, Nichols L. « Flying by the seat of our pants »: what dementia family caregivers want in an advanced caregiver training program. Res Nurs Health. 2012;35(6):598–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Low L-F, White F, Jeon Y-H, Gresham M, Brodaty H. Desired characteristics and outcomes of community care services for persons with dementia: what is important according to clients, service providers and policy? Australas J Ageing. 2013;32(2):91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Vaingankar JA, Subramaniam M, Picco L, Eng GK, Shafie S, Sambasivam R, et al. Perceived unmet needs of informal caregivers of people with dementia in Singapore. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(10):1605–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Muders P, Zahrt-Omar CA, Bussmann S, Haberstroh J, Weber M. Support for families of patients dying with dementia: a qualitative analysis of bereaved family members’ experiences and suggestions. Palliat Support Care. 2015;13(3):435–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Meyer OL, Nguyen KH, Dao TN, Vu P, Arean P, Hinton L. The sociocultural context of caregiving experiences for Vietnamese dementia family caregivers. Asian Am J Psychol. 2015;6(3):263–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Griffiths J, Bunrayong W. Problems and needs in helping older people with dementia with daily activities: Perspectives of Thai caregivers. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79(2):78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Peterson K, Hahn H, Lee AJ, Madison CA, Atri A. In the Information Age, do dementia caregivers get the information they need? Semi-structured interviews to determine informal caregivers’ education needs, barriers, and preferences. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(1):164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Samson ZB, Parker M, Dye C, Hepburn K. Experiences and Learning Needs of African American Family Dementia Caregivers. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2016;31(6):492–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Jennings LA, Palimaru A, Corona MG, Cagigas XE, Ramirez KD, Zhao T, et al. Patient and caregiver goals for dementia care. Qual Life Res. 2016;26(3):685–93

  96. Wolfs CAG, de Vugt ME, Verkaaik M, Verkade P-J, Verhey FRJ. Empowered or overpowered? Service use, needs, wants and demands in elderly patients with cognitive impairments. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25(10):1006–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Kuhn DR. Caring for relatives with early stage Alzheimer’s disease: An exploratory study. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 1998;13(4):189–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Habermann B, Davis LL. Caring for family with Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease: needs, challenges and satisfaction. J Gerontol Nurs. 2005;31(6):49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Ducharme F, Kergoat M-J, Coulombe R, Lévesque L, Antoine P, Pasquier F. Unmet support needs of early-onset dementia family caregivers: a mixed-design study. BMC Nurs. 2014;13(1):49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Leong J, Madjar I, Fiveash B. Needs of Family Carers of Elderly People with Dementia Living in the Community. Australas J Ageing. 2001;20(3):133–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Stirling C, Andrews S, Croft T, Vickers J, Turner P, Robinson A. Measuring dementia carers’ unmet need for services--an exploratory mixed method study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Detailed search strategies and lists of references included in this systematic review are available upon request.

Authors’ contributions

TN (PhD candidate) and CM (PharmD, PhD) performed the study selection, the data collection and wrote the main part of the article. The critical revision of the manuscript was made by VD (PhD, methodologist) and Pr. PK-S (MD, PhD, neurologist and geriatrician). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. EA-7425 HESPER, Health Services and Performance Research, University Lyon, F-69003, Lyon, France

    T. Novais

  2. Clinical Research Centre (CRC) - VCF (Aging – Brain - Frailty), Charpennes Hospital, University Hospital of Lyon, F-69100, Villeurbanne, France

    T. Novais, P. Krolak-Salmon & C. Mouchoux

  3. Pharmaceutical Unit, Charpennes Hospital, University Hospital of Lyon, F-69100, Villeurbanne, France

    T. Novais & C. Mouchoux

  4. Clinical and Research Memory Centre of Lyon (CMRR), Charpennes Hospital, University Hospital of Lyon, F-69100, Villeurbanne, France

    V. Dauphinot & P. Krolak-Salmon

  5. University Lyon 1, F-69000, Lyon, France

    P. Krolak-Salmon & C. Mouchoux

  6. INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team, University Lyon 1, F-69000, Lyon, France

    P. Krolak-Salmon & C. Mouchoux

Authors
  1. T. Novais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Dauphinot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Krolak-Salmon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Mouchoux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to T. Novais or C. Mouchoux.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Search strategies. This file provide the search strategies used in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science in order to identify quantitative and qualitative studies for the systematic review. (DOC 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Novais, T., Dauphinot, V., Krolak-Salmon, P. et al. How to explore the needs of informal caregivers of individuals with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease or related diseases? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. BMC Geriatr 17, 86 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0481-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0481-9

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us