Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Geriatrics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Incidence and predictors of left ventricular remodeling among elderly Asian women: a community-based cohort study

BMC GeriatricsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:21

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0411-x

Received: 31 May 2016

Accepted: 3 January 2017

Published: 14 January 2017

Abstract

Background

Left ventricular (LV) remodeling is closely linked to the progression of heart failure. There are limited data on the epidemiology of new onset LV remodeling among elderly women, which requires further investigation.

Method

We examined data from a community-based cohort of women aged > 65 years, who had received > 2 echocardiography scans from 2009 to 2014. Exclusion criteria for patients included prior echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular enlargement (LVE) or hypertrophy (LVH). LVE was defined as the index of left ventricular internal diameter at end-diastole to height, and LVH was defined as the left ventricular mass and thickness index which indicate hypertrophy.

Results

Of the 474 subjects (age 71.85 ± 6.47 years), 49 (10.3%) developed LVH, while 55 (11.6%) developed LVE during the mean follow-up period of 5 years. Independent predictors of LVH included: central blood pressure (CBP, per 10 mmHg) [HR 1.094, 95% CI 1.011–1.202], BMI˃25(kg/m 2)[HR 1.306, 95% CI 1.175–1.434], B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) ≥ 100 (pg/mL) [HR 1.635, 95% CI 1.107–3.311] and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) ≥16 m/s [HR 1.605, 95% CI 1.474–2.039]. Predictors of LVE were CBP (per 10 mmHg) [HR 1.121, 95% CI 1.027–1.238], BMI˃25(kg/m 2)[HR 1.302, 95% CI 1.173–1.444], Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [HR 1.193, 95%CI 1.013–1.405] and E/e’ ratio [HR 1.077, 95% CI 1.017–1.140].

Conclusion

CBP and BMI were demonstrated to be independent and robust predictors of left ventricular remodeling among elderly women, including both LVE and LVH. BNP and baPWV were specifically related to the development of LVH, whereas LDL-C and E/e’ ratio were related to LVE.

Keywords

Left ventricular enlargementLeft ventricular hypertrophyPredictorCohortWomenElderly

Background

Left ventricular (LV) remodeling is considered as a precursor for worsening cardiac function and is often associated with a high mortality rate in affected patients [1]. Studies have suggested that patients usually progress through an adverse LV remodeling phase prior to development of symptomatic heart failure (HF) [2]. Substantial progress has been made in improving the accuracy and early assessment of LV remodeling. However, identification of the early predictors of LV remodeling as well as their potential roles is still poorly understood. Recently, several longitudinal cohort studies have identified the importance of chronic non-cardiac diseases which may result in the progression and deterioration of subclinical LV remodeling to HF [3, 4].

Numerous studies support the notion that males are significantly more at risk in the development of cardiovascular events. A potential underlying mechanism may be closely related to the protective effect of estrogen expression in women [5]. In the elderly population, the prevalence of HF is indistinguishable between males and females [6]. It is noteworthy that women are more prone to have increased relative wall thickness [7]. However, epidemiological data on the prevalence of LV remodeling risk factors and their impact in women are still unclear. Therefore, it is important to acquire data from population-based studies on women with LV remodeling, including incidences of LVE and LVH.

There are limited studies which examine the relationship between various bio-markers and central hemodynamic indexes with the specific type of LV remodeling. Our previous study demonstrated that women have double the incidence rate of LV remodeling compared to men [8]. Therefore, the current cohort study consisted of 474 elderly women subjects. This study aimed to explore potential predictors of new onset LV remodeling in women.

Methods

Study population

The baseline examination was carried out in 2009. All the participants underwent physical examination, structured interview, blood sampling, and pulse wave analysis at the research center, as well as an echocardiography scan [8]. A total 1259 women (age>18) were randomly recruited from the Lujiazui community, Shanghai, China. 1070 of them underwent follow-up investigation in 2014. For the present study, we aimed to investigate the predictors of new-onset LV remodeling among elderly women. According to the exclusion criteria: 305 were excluded for their age less than 65 year; 93 were excluded for their medical history of Coronary heart disease (CHD), Heart failure (HF) and Valvular heart disease (VHD). The 198 subjects who were diagnosed as LV remodeling prior to cohort entry were also excluded. As a result, 474 subjects were eligible for the current study. During the 5 year follow up period, 45 women had developed LVH and 55 had developed LVE. Detailed information of the study population is provided in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Flowchart of the study. LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; LVE, left ventricular enlargement; CAD, coronary artery disease; HF, heart failure; VHD, valvular heart disease

Echocardiographic analysis

Echocardiography examination with trans-thoracic two-dimensional (2D) scanning was performed using a color Doppler ultrasonic device equipped with a 1.0–5.0 MHz transducer (GE Vivid 7; General Motors Corporation, New York, USA). Cardiac parameters including left atrium diameter (LAD), left ventricular internal diameter at end-diastole (LVIDd), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), inter ventricular sepal thickness (IVST) and posterior left ventricular wall thickness (PVWT) were collected based on echocardiographic examination. E/A ratio was calculated based on peak early diastolic flow velocity (E velocity)/peak velocity of atrial contraction (A velocity). E/e’ ratio was determined by the E velocity/velocity of mitral annulus early diastolic motion (e’).

Defining left ventricular enlargement and hypertrophy

We have previously reported the methodology for defining LVH and LVE in a cross-sectional study [8]. Thus, we used these former standards for the follow-up assessment. Preliminary criteria for defining LVH depended on the measurement of left ventricular mass index (LVMi). LVMi was determined by dividing the LVM measurement by height2.71. LVM was calculated based on the guidelines from the American Society of Echocardiography: LVM (g) = 0.8 × {1.04 × [(LVIDd + PVWT + IVST) 3− (LVIDd) 3]} + 0.6 (g) [9]. LVH was defined as LVMi > 46.7g/m2.71 for women and LVE was determined by indexing LVIDd to height, as previously demonstrated [10]. LVE was defined by LVIDd (mm) of greater than 28.3 + [13.9 × height (m)] for women [10].

Laboratory measurements

All blood samples were obtained during the morning fasting state. Plasma total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were measured enzymatically. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP, ECLIA Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) was measured using electro chemiluminescence immunoassay. Glaciated hemoglobin (HbA1C) was measured using ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography. Serum high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) was measured using immunonephelometry (Dade Behring Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany). Homocysteine (HCY) was measured using fluorescence polarization immunoassay (Abbott IMx System, Chicago, IL, USA). Diabetes was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels ≥7.0mmol/L, or self-reported diagnosis of diabetes. Dyslipidemia was defined as total cholesterol (TC) >5.7 mmol/L or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >3.6 mmol/L.

Pulse wave analysis

Non-invasive pulse wave analysis was performed with an automated oscillometric device (HEM-9000 AI; Omron Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Subjects were examined in a sitting posture. Radial augmentation index (AI), Systolic blood pressure(SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and estimate of central blood pressure (CBP) were obtained after resting for 5–10 min. Hypertension was defined as either systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mmHg, or usage of antihypertensive medication. The detailed methodology was validated in our previous report [8].

Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement

baPWV was measured using a volume-plethysmographic device (PWV/ABI, Omron Corp., Tokyo, Japan), which simultaneously recorded brachial and posterior tibial arterial wave forms with automated oscillometric method [11]. Echocardiographic examination was performed by placement of electrodes on the wrists and cuffs on the bilateral brachia and ankles of subjects, while resting in a supine position. The average value of baPWV was taken if there were differences in the measurements from the left and right sides [12].

Statistical analysis

SPSS 19.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Categorical variables were presented as frequency percentages and the comparison between groups were based on the chi-squared test. Continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviation (SD) for normal distribution. Two samples T-test was used to compare differences between groups. We described skewed distribution variables as median (inter-quartile range). Accordingly, these variables were compared by nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test. Multivariate cox proportional hazards regression models were developed to assess independent predictive value of LVE or LVH. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the study population and patients with LVH or LVE are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The average age of the 474 participants were 71.85±6.47 years, and had no prior history of heart diseases and echocardiographic evidence of LVH and LVE. Over a mean follow-up period of 5 years, 49 (10.3%) subjects had developed LVH; 55 (11.6%) subjects had developed LVE; 22 (4.6%) subjects had both LVH and LVE.
Table 1

Baseline clinical characteristics of study population according to left ventricular remodeling status at follow up (left ventricular hypertrophy vs. non-left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular enlargement vs. non-left ventricular enlargement)

Characteristic

All subjects (n = 474)

Groups

P-value

Groups

P-value

LVH (n = 49)

Non-LVH (n = 425)

LVE (n = 55)

Non-LVE (n = 419)

Age (years)

71.85±6.47

72.39±6.54

71.80±6.49

0.148

72.88±6.27

71.74±6.48

0.046

BMI (kg/m2)

24.35±3.18

27.08±3.47

24.03±2.98

0.000

26.95±3.72

24.00±2.93

0.000

SBP (mmHg)

138.85±20.50

151.02±19.61

137.39±20.12

0.000

150.25±20.80

137.37±20.01

0.000

DBP (mmHg)

76.49±11.20

81.67±9.15

75.79±11.14

0.000

81.82±10.35

75.80±11.44

0.000

CBP (mmHg)

144.35±22.30

157.13±21.28

142.93±19.80

0.000

157.05±24.34

142.70±21.51

0.000

baPWV (cm/s)

16.32 (14.42, 18.67)

17.47 (14.93, 20.53)

15.21 (13.98, 18.44)

0.000

17.10 (15.13, 19.73)

16.21 (14.31, 17.98)

0.028

Hypertension

205 (43.2%)

29 (59.2%)

176 (41.4%)

0.022

31 (56.4%)

174 (41.5%)

0.058

Diabetes

48 (10.1%)

6 (12.2%)

42 (9.9%)

0.514

7 (12.7%)

41 (9.8%)

0.281

Dyslipidemia

121 (25.2%)

13 (26.5%)

108 (25.4%)

0.865

18 (32.7%)

103 (24.6%)

0.237

Laboratory tests

TC (mmol/l)

5.31±0.96

5.37±1.06

5.30±0.95

0.820

5.30±1.07

5.31±0.95

0.964

TG (mmol/l)

1.77±0.39

1.82±0.23

1.77±0.41

0.750

1.87±0.64

1.76±0.58

0.479

HDL-C (mmol/l)

1.32±0.32

1.31±0.35

1.32±0.31

0.802

1.27±0.29

1.32±0.32

0.212

LDL-C (mmol/l)

3.28±0.75

3.24±0.63

3.28±0.56

0.758

3.72±0.70

3.22±0.83

0.015

FPG (mmol/l)

5.39±1.01

5.59±0.78

5.37±0.96

0.249

5.53±0.66

5.37±0.41

0.337

HbA1C (%)

5.98±0.98

5.92±0.56

5.99±1.01

0.553

6.08±0.54

5.88±0.79

0.169

BNP (pg/ml)

60.0 (35.0, 95.0)

75.0 (40.0, 133.0)

60.0 (35.0, 91.5)

0.016

70.0 (42.0, 123.0)

60.0 (35.0, 93.5)

0.254

HCY (umol/l)

11.0 (9.5, 14.0)

12.0 (10.0,14.0)

11.0 (9.0, 14.0)

0.354

11.0 (9.0, 14.0)

11.0 (9.0, 13.5)

0.750

hsCRP (mg/l)

1.35 (0.69, 2.59)

1.98 (0.99, 3.27)

1.31 (0.68, 2.51)

0.019

1.97 (0.99, 3.86)

1.30 (0.67, 2.34)

0.004

UA (umol/l)

310.0 (263.5, 361.5)

323.0 (286.0, 346.0)

309.0 (263.0, 363.0)

0.207

308.0 (268.0, 365.0)

310.0 (264.0, 361.0)

0.745

Continuous variables with normal distribution were expressed as the mean±SD. In case of skewed distribution continuous variables (containing baPWV, BNP, HCY, hsCRP, UA) were presented as median (inter-quartile range)

BMI body mass index, BNP B-type natriuretic peptide, DBP diastolic blood pressure, FPG fasting plasma glucose, LVH left ventricular hypertrophy, LVE left ventricular enlargement, HCY homocysteine, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hsCRP high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, SBP systolic blood pressure, TC total cholesterol, TG total triglycerides

Table 2

Baseline echocardiographic characteristics of study population according to left ventricular remodeling status at follow up (left ventricular hypertrophy vs. non-left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular enlargement vs. non-left ventricular enlargement)

Characteristic

All subjects (n = 474)

Groups

P-value

Groups

P-value

LVH (n = 49)

Non-LVH (n = 425)

LVE (n = 55)

Non-LVE (n = 419)

LVMI (g/m2.71)

35.91 (30.41, 41.36)

51.42 (48.42, 56.53)

34.79 (30.09, 39.51)

0.000

47.21 (40.10, 55.12)

34.87 (30.0, 39.67)

0.000

LVM (g)

12

176.19±21.29

122.81±25.18

0.000

160.31±17.26

124.10±23.77

0.000

RWT

0.35±0.05

0.36±0.05

0.34±0.04

0.133

0.30±0.04

0.35±0.05

0.000

LVEF (%)

64.44±3.51

62.83±3.01

63.51±3.57

0.135

63.78±3.36

64.53±3.51

0.124

E/e’ ratio

12.5 (9.09, 16.6)

14.28 (11.11, 18.0)

12.5 (9.09, 16.66)

0.080

13.46 (11.5, 16.6)

12.5 (8.33, 16.6)

0.019

E/A ratio

1.12±0.32

1.02±0.18

1.12±0.24

0.088

0.96±0.22

1.14±0.16

0.127

LAD (mm)

34.73±5.41

36.31±3.81

34.50±5.51

0.006

36.71±4.56

34.46±5.64

0.003

LVIDd (mm)

46.66±4.13

50.73±3.79

46.17±3.89

0.000

52.62±2.70

45.86±3.61

0.000

PVWT (mm)

8.05±1.06

8.98±1.30

7.03±0.98

0.000

8.05±1.27

8.01±1.02

0.670

IVST (mm)

8.56±1.24

10.08±1.26

8.38±1.11

0.000

8.97±1.57

8.11±1.17

0.036

Continuous variables with normal distribution were expressed as the mean±SD. In case of skewed distribution continuous variables (containing LVMI and E/e’) were presented as median (inter-quartile range)

LVH left ventricular hypertrophy, LVE left ventricular enlargement, LAD left atrium diameter, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVMI left ventricle mass index, LVIDd left atrium diameter, left ventricular internal diameter at end-diastole, IVST inter ventricular sepal thickness, PVWT posterior left ventricular wall thickness

Comparison between patients with or without LVH at baseline indicated that the level of BMI, CBP, baPWV and hsCRP in patients with LVH was significantly higher than that in those without LVH (P <0.05 for all). A similar result was observed in patients with or without LVE. Of note, increased BNP level was only found in subjects with LVH. Patients with LVE had higher age and were prone to have increased levels of LDL-C. Cardiac ultrasonography parameters between these groups are displayed in Table 2. Owing to the echocardiographic definitions for LVE and LVH, both groups had higher left ventricular geometry parameters. Subjects with LVE were also observed to have higher E/e’ ratio.

The multivariate models were developed to predict the first events of LVH and LVE. We selected variables that demonstrated significant statistical differences between groups (LVH vs. non-LVH, and LVE vs. non-LVE) and those variables were entered into multivariate Cox regression models for the assessment of independent risk factors of LVH or LVE. As shown in Table 3, CBP (per 10mmHg; HR 1.094; 95%CI 1.011–1.202), BMI˃25(kg/m 2) (HR 1.336; 95%CI 1.195–1.494), BNP ≥ 100 (pg/mL) (HR 1.635; 95%CI 1.107–3.311) and baPWV ≥16 (m/s) (HR 1.605; 95%CI 1.474–2.039) were associated with the development of LVH. Independent predictors of LVE included CBP (per 10mmHg; HR 1.121; 95%CI 1.027–1.238), BMI˃25(kg/m 2) (HR 1.302; 95%CI 1.173–1.444), LDL-C (HR 1.193; 95%CI 1.013–1.405) and E/e’ ratio (HR, 1.077; 95%CI 1.017–1.140), as demonstrated in Table 4.
Table 3

Multivariate model for prediction of LVH

Variables

Hazard

Ratio

95%

Age (years)

1.032

0.912–1.108

0.248

Hypertension (%)

1.233

0.610–2.491

0.560

CBP (per 10mmHg)

1.094

1.011–1.202

0.021

BMI ≥25 (kg/m2)a

1.306

1.175–1.434

<0.001

BNP ≥100 (pg/mL)b

1.635

1.107–3.311

0.007

hsCRP (mg/L)

1.009

0.771–1.123

0.664

baPWV ≥16 (m/s)

1.605

1.474–2.039

0.009

Values expressed as Hazard Ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI). Abbreviations are the same as in Table 1

Covariates in the basic model included age, hypertension, CBP, BMI ≥25 (kg/m2), BNP ≥ 100 (pg/mL), hsCRP and baPWV ≥16 (m/s)

aBMI greater than 25 is considered overweight and formed into two categories according to NICE Guidance 2014

bBNP was formed into two categories according to European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012

Table 4

Multivariate model for prediction of LVE

Variables

Hazard

Ratio

95%

Age (years)

1.012

0.962–1.066

0.338

Hypertension (%)

1.282

0.725–2.888

0.550

CBP (per 10mmHg)

1.121

1.027–1.238

0.004

BMI ≥25 (kg/m2)

1.302

1.173–1.444

<0.001

LDL-C

1.193

1.013–1.405

0.034

hsCRP (mg/L)

1.068

0.967–1.180

0.195

baPWV ≥16 (m/s)

1.573

0.869–2.568

0.159

E/e’ ratio

1.077

1.017–1.140

0.011

Values expressed as Hazard Ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI). Abbreviations are the same as in Tables 1 and 2

Covariates in the basic model included age, hypertension, CBP, BMI ≥25 (kg/m2), LDL-C, hsCRP, baPWV ≥16 (m/s) and E/e’ ratio

Discussion

In this longitudinal cohort study among elderly women, there was a high incidence of new-onset LVE (11.6%) and LVH (10.3%) occurrence. The increase in the levels of CBP and BMI were predictive for both LVE and LVH, after accounting for various potential confounding factors. BaPWV index using detailed noninvasive evaluation and BNP were specifically correlated with the development of LVH, but not LVE. In addition, the E/e’ ratio using Doppler echocardiogram and LDL-C were predictive for the development of LVE.

The effect of gender during cardiac remodeling is still unclear. Data from Framingham Heart Study revealed that women have a greater age-related increase in LV wall thickness [13]. It has also been reported that concentric remodeling is more pronounced in women [14, 15]. To our knowledge, our study is the first which examines the predictors of LV remodeling among elderly women. We had previously reported that among women (age > 40 years), the prevalence of LVH and LVE were 9.34% and 10.04%, respectively [8]. Our current findings show a relatively high incidence rate for both LVH and LVE in elderly women. This could be partly due to the changes in hormone levels in post-menopause women. The cardio-protective role of estrogen has been well established. However, the high prevalence of LVH and LVE might not be entirely due to the depletion of estrogen, but also the expression of testosterone, which promotes cardiac dysfunction and remodeling [16]. Studies have demonstrated that women are less likely to receive preventive treatment or guidance, such as lipid-lowering drugs, aspirin, and therapeutic lifestyle changes [17]. Thus, inadequate control of risk factors in women is a potential risk factor for the occurrence of LV remodeling.

Increased BMI and BP are commonly recognized as predictors of cardiovascular disease. Our study further strengthened the notion that BMI and CBP were the important predictors of LV remodeling, and were strongly related to the development of both LVH and LVE. These findings suggest that effective control of body weight and BP are crucial in the early prevention of LV remodeling. We had previously reported that BNP was a risk factor for both LVH and LVE in the general population [8]. However, our current regression model showed that BNP failed to independently predict for LVE. BNP is elevated in response to an increase in myocardial wall stress. Early mild ventricular dilation plays a protective role and helps maintain an adequate stroke volume [18]. Therefore, this cardiac compensatory function would not lead to significant increases in BNP level following development of LVE. Due to the difference in study population, this result may be explained in part by the gender-specific control of myocardial adaptations to hemodynamic overload. To support this notion, studies have revealed a rapid induction of plasma BNP and ANP during myocardial dysfunction in men [19].

Dyslipidemia is the metabolic abnormalities observed frequently in patients with heart diseases. Francesco et al reported that unsatisfactory control of LDL cholesterol after myocardial infarction independently predicts LV remodeling [20]. For the current study, we found that high LDL-C predicted the development of left ventricular enlargement, but not hypertrophy in multivariable models. Due to the limited data on the relationship between LDL-C and left ventricular remodeling, it is still different to tell whether high LDL-C specifically predicts LVE. This result is broadly consistent with the findings of previous researches [20, 21]. Also, in some sense, it strengthens the need for the achievement and maintenance of target serum lipids for reducing LV remodeling.

The ratio of early trans-mitral flow velocity (E) to early diastolic septal mitral annulus velocity (E/e’) has been shown to be the most accurate noninvasive predictor of elevated LV filling pressure [22]. According to the echocardiography-Doppler criteria for assessment of diastolic function, E/e’>10 indicate moderate to severe diastolic dysfunction [23]. During pressure overload, hearts of female subjects often develop concentric hypertrophy as a compensatory function in order to maintain stable cardiac function [18]. However, when the impairment progresses past a certain stage, ventricular dilation takes place. Our results demonstrated that E/e’ was a predictor of LVE in elderly female subjects. These patients often do not report adverse symptoms, however they are at risk to more serious deterioration of cardiac function. Whether E/e’ and LVIDd is directly proportional is still unknown, and requires further investigation.

Cardiac abnormalities in adults often develop in concert with atherosclerosis [24]. BaPWV is a promising technique to assess arterial stiffness in large population-based investigations [25]. Numerous studies have reported a positive correlation between increased LVMI and baPWV [26, 27]. Arterial stiffness may contribute to LVH independently of BP [26, 28]. Our current study showed that risk of LVH rose markedly in patients with baPWV>16m/s. Increased vascular resistance with hypertension places severe strain on the heart, which is by far the most common cause of LVH [29]. High baPWV level is a common sign of atherosclerotic vascular damage. Thus, evaluation of baPWV is particularly important in elderly women, as a convenient and early indicator of LVH.

This study has several limitations that need to be addressed. Firstly, the prevalence of LVH and LVE might be overstated since the use of echocardiography as a routine screening strategy for cardiac remodeling in population-based investigation remains controversial. LV mass calculated according to the measurements of echocardiography may be overestimated when compared with the gold standard of MRI [30]. Echocardiography is now listed as a class I evidence for the evaluation of patients with HF, while also being widely used for observing alterations in LV geometry and structure [7, 9]. Considering the convenience and practicability of echocardiography in population-based epidemiological investigations, it is the preferred choice for our research design. Secondly, in order to avoid potential bias of information obtained from the self-administered questionnaire, we did not analyze effects of drug use and postpartum hemodynamic changes which may potentially influence LV geometry. The data presented herein were grouped as the presence or absence of LVE (and LVH). Eighteen subjects were confirmed with both LVE and LVH according to the assessment criteria. We fell short of a combinatorial assessment these two remodeling patterns. This needs to be compensated in our future investigations.

Conclusion

This study shows the incidence rates of new onset LV remodeling in a community-based nested case-control cohort. Risk profiles at baseline for LVH and LVE were determined. We determined that increased LV remodeling may be associated with higher incidence of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in elderly women. Therefore, better understanding of LV remodeling in women is critical in improving the prevention of HF.

Abbreviations

A: 

Peak flow velocity of atrial contraction

baPWV: 

Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity

BNP: 

B-type natriuretic peptide

CAD: 

Coronary artery disease

CBP: 

Central blood pressure

E: 

Peak early diastolic flow velocity

e’: 

Velocity of mitral annulus early diastolic motion

FPG: 

Fasting plasma glucose

HbA1C: 

Glaciated hemoglobin

HCY: 

Homocysteine

HDL-C: 

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

HF: 

Heart failure

hsCRP: 

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein

IVST: 

Interventricular sepal thickness

LAD: 

Left atrium diameter

LDL-C: 

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LVE: 

Left ventricular enlargement

LVEF: 

Left ventricular ejection fraction

LVH: 

Left ventricular hypertrophy

LVIDd: 

Left ventricular internal diameter at end-diastole

LVM: 

Left ventricular mass

LVMI: 

Left ventricular mass index

PVWT: 

Posterior left ventricular wall thickness

TC: 

Total cholesterol

TG: 

Total triglyceride

UA: 

Serum uric acid

VHD: 

Valvular heart disease

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors express their sincere gratitude to all staff involved in this survey for their important contributions.

Funding

This study was supported by Postdoctoral Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (A1-U164090305).

Availability of data and materials

The dataset analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

JW, JZ and LX designed the study and wrote the manuscript. CW and WF performed statistical analysis and provided clinical experience. All authors have read and approve of the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved the Ethics Committee of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All participants had signed informed consent forms and provided permission for inclusion in this study.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Nursing, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
(2)
Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

References

  1. Cheng S, Vasan RS. Advances in the epidemiology of heart failure and left ventricular remodeling. Circulation. 2011;124(20):e516–519.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Gaasch WH, Zile MR. Left ventricular structural remodeling in health and disease: with special emphasis on volume, mass, and geometry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(17):1733–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gjesdal O, Bluemke DA, Lima JA. Cardiac remodeling at the population level--risk factors, screening, and outcomes. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8(12):673–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Borlaug BA, Rodeheffer RJ, Kass DA. Age- and gender-related ventricular-vascular stiffening: a community-based study. Circulation. 2005;112(15):2254–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pedram A, Razandi M, Narayanan R, Dalton JT, McKinsey TA, Levin ER. Estrogen regulates histone deacetylases to prevent cardiac hypertrophy. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24(24):3805–18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. McMurray JJ, Stewart S. Epidemiology, aetiology, and prognosis of heart failure. Heart. 2000;83(5):596–602.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gomez-Sanchez MA, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(14):1787–847.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wu L, Zhang L, Ai Z, Zou L, Zhu Y, Bao Y, Li J, Kang S, Fan H, Zhang D, et al. Association between risk factors and left ventricular remodeling in middle-aged and aged population: a community-based study. J Hypertens. 2012;30(9):1862–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18(12):1440–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ky B, Plappert T, Kirkpatrick J, Silvestry FE, Ferrari VA, Keane MG, Wiegers SE, Chirinos JA, St John Sutton M. Left ventricular remodeling in human heart failure: quantitative echocardiographic assessment of 1,794 patients. Echocardiography. 2012;29(7):758–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Munakata M, Ito N, Nunokawa T, Yoshinaga K. Utility of automated brachial ankle pulse wave velocity measurements in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16(8):653–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Otsuka T, Munakata R, Kato K, Kodani E, Ibuki C, Kusama Y, Seino Y, Kawada T. Oscillometric measurement of brachial artery cross-sectional area and its relationship with cardiovascular risk factors and arterial stiffness in a middle-aged male population. Hypertens Res. 2013;36(10):910–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Salton CJ, Chuang ML, O’Donnell CJ, Kupka MJ, Larson MG, Kissinger KV, Edelman RR, Levy D, Manning WJ. Gender differences and normal left ventricular anatomy in an adult population free of hypertension. A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study of the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(6):1055–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Natori S, Lai S, Finn JP, Gomes AS, Hundley WG, Jerosch-Herold M, Pearson G, Sinha S, Arai A, Lima JA, et al. Cardiovascular function in multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. normal values by age, sex, and ethnicity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(6 Suppl 2):S357–365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jain A, McClelland RL, Polak JF, Shea S, Burke GL, Bild DE, Watson KE, Budoff MJ, Liu K, Post WS, et al. Cardiovascular imaging for assessing cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic men versus women: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(1):8–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cavasin MA, Sankey SS, Yu AL, Menon S, Yang XP. Estrogen and testosterone have opposing effects on chronic cardiac remodeling and function in mice with myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;284(5):H1560–1569.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Garcia M, Mulvagh SL, Bairey Merz CN, Buring JE, Manson JE. Cardiovascular disease in women: clinical perspectives. Circ Res. 2016;118(8):1273–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Piro M, Della Bona R, Abbate A, Biasucci LM, Crea F. Sex-related differences in myocardial remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(11):1057–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Luchner A, Brockel U, Muscholl M, Hense HW, Doring A, Riegger GA, Schunkert H. Gender-specific differences of cardiac remodeling in subjects with left ventricular dysfunction: a population-based study. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;53(3):720–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Buono F, Spinelli L, Giallauria F, Assante di Panzillo E, Di Marino S, Ferrara F, Vigorito C, Trimarco B, Morisco C. Usefulness of satisfactory control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to predict left ventricular remodeling after a first ST-elevation myocardial infarction successfully reperfused. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(12):1772–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Horio T, Miyazato J, Kamide K, Takiuchi S, Kawano Y. Influence of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16(11):938–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, Miller FA, Oh JK, Redfield MM, Tajik AJ. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation. 2000;102(15):1788–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bursi F, Weston SA, Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Pakhomov S, Nkomo VT, Meverden RA, Roger VL. Systolic and diastolic heart failure in the community. JAMA. 2006;296(18):2209–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gencer B, Butler J, Bauer DC, Auer R, Kalogeropoulos A, Marques-Vidal P, Applegate WB, Satterfield S, Harris T, Newman A. Association of electrocardiogram abnormalities and incident heart failure events. Am Heart J. 2014;167(6):869–75. e863.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, Pannier B, Vlachopoulos C, Wilkinson I, Struijker-Boudier H. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(21):2588–605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Chung CM, Lin YS, Chu CM, Chang ST, Cheng HW, Yang TY, Hsiao JF, Pan KL, Hsu JT. Arterial stiffness is the independent factor of left ventricular hypertrophy determined by electrocardiogram. Am J Med Sci. 2012;344(3):190–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Su HM, Lin TH, Hsu PC, Lee CS, Lee WH, Chen SC, Voon WC, Lai WT, Sheu SH. Association of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, ankle-brachial index and ratio of brachial pre-ejection period to ejection time with left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Med Sci. 2014;347(4):289–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Roman MJ, Pickering TG, Schwartz JE, Pini R, Devereux RB. Association of carotid atherosclerosis and left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25(1):83–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schirmer H, Lunde P, Rasmussen K. Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in a general population; The Tromso Study. Eur Heart J. 1999;20(6):429–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Konstam MA, Kramer DG, Patel AR, Maron MS, Udelson JE. Left ventricular remodeling in heart failure: current concepts in clinical significance and assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(1):98–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement