Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Geriatrics

Volume 10 Supplement 1

de Senectute: Age and Health Forum

Open Access

Monoclonal gammopathies

  • S Tozzi1
BMC Geriatrics201010(Suppl 1):L73

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-S1-L73

Published: 19 May 2010

Clinical background

The finding of a monoclonal immunoglobulin in the serum defines the so-called monoclonal gammopathy. Monoclonal components are homogeneus immunoglobulins whole (intact) or fragmented, produced by a single expanded plasma cell clone. MCs present unique physicochemical homogeneity, which is reflected in their immunological homogeinity. Immunological homogeinity by electrophoresis is shown with the appearance of a compact band which possesses only a single type of heavy and light chains.

Protein electrophoresis is, therefore, a main method in the laboratory of clinical chemistry in particular for the relief and the quantification of Monoclonal Components [14].

Together with the traditional techniques of electrophoresis on cellulose acetate or agarose gel, other analytical approaches are emerging to highlight and quantify the CM. In particular, in recent years, several authors have emphasized the usefulness of capillary electrophoresis both to highlight the CM and for their quantification [5, 6].

We considered appropriate to determine, on a personal case study:

The performance of capillary electrophoresis to show small, medium and large monoclonal components comparing the data obtained by this technique with those obtained with traditional techniques, particularly with agarose gel electrophoresis.

We performed the quantification of the CM both in capillary electrophoresis and through conventional densitometry.

Assessing sensibility of the two methods to show the CM by determining the minimum detectable concentration of CM with the two methods.

Conclusions

Capillary electrophoresis has proven a reliable method in highlighting and quantifying CM and besides involves operational advantages such as fully automated execution, the operating speed is extremely limited and performers need a lower experience. This is translated into more reproducible constant results over time. It’s important, however, to emphasize the need for a careful examination of the electrophoretic paths obtained. Often, in the presence of CM, only slight modifications of the path are observed that could escape a careless observer. When in doubt, immunofixation will still solve the problem.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratorio di Genetica - Azienda ospedaliera di Cosenza

References

  1. Aguzzi F, Kohn J, Petrini C, Whicher JT: Densitometry of serum protein electropherograms (letter). Clin. Chem. 1986, 32: 2004-Google Scholar
  2. Aguzzi F, et al: L’elettroforesi delle siero proteine 1 - Raccomandazione ufficiale della commissione SIBioC. Giorn. It. di Chim. Clin. 1990, 15 (51):Google Scholar
  3. Merlini G, Bellotti V, Aguzzi F: Come affrontare una gammopatia monoclonale. Biochim. Clin. 1991, 15: 1441-7.Google Scholar
  4. Merlini G: Le componenti monoclonali- Raccomandazione ufficiale SIBioC. Giorn. It. Chim. Clin. 1990, 15: 63-Google Scholar
  5. Rosa A M, et al: Implementazione in una sezione di urgenza dell’elettroforesi capillare: confronto con gel di agarosio. 37 Congresso Nazionale SIBioC. 2005, 29 (2):Google Scholar
  6. Blessum C, Jeppson O, Aguzzi F, et al: L’electrophorése capillaire : principe et applications au laboratoire de biologie clinique. Ann Biol Clin. 1999, 57: 643-57.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Tozzi; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement