Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Geriatrics

Volume 10 Supplement 1

de Senectute: Age and Health Forum

Open Access

The US imaging in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysm: perspective

  • E Scarcello1,
  • A Conti1,
  • M Mazzei1,
  • F Morrone1,
  • P Piro1,
  • S Tarsitano1,
  • P Perri1 and
  • F Intrieri1
BMC Geriatrics201010(Suppl 1):L17

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-S1-L17

Published: 19 May 2010

The development of surgical techniques depends on the concomitant development of imaging techniques. Imaging with ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is evolving at rapid pace.

The basic need for treatment is mainly important for the endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) that requires information about many different anatomical aspects regarding aneurysmal neck, renal arteries, and diameter of aneurysmal free lumen, aortic bifurcation, diameter and length of iliac vessels.

At present, the development of color-Doppler instruments is surely comparable with that of CT and MR imaging, and an important development has been made also for different types of ultrasonographic contrast medium. The intravascular US (IVUS) mode appears particularly important, that allows real-time detection of a lot of information useful in EVAR.

At present, in elective treatment US examination plays a role in different steps:

  • diagnosis

  • AAA classification (below, iuxta or suprarenal AAA)

  • per operative management with IVUS mode [1]

  • postoperative follow-up.

In emergency, the US examination has a place first of all as a bedside exam for patients with a suspected ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). In haemodinamically stable patients the firtsline US examination appears mandatory during an examination of patients to detect the AAA and to avoid misdiagnosis or, in the opposite case, to abstain from undue X-rays exposition. Actually the physical examination allows the detection of an AAA in about 43% [2] of the patients, and its sensibility results lower for an iliac aneurysm, whereas that of US is up to 99% [3]. In haemodinamically instable patients emergency US exam appears at present the only possible evaluation in the immediately preoperative stage, as the CT exam provides an obligatory and dangerous delay. Moreover in haemodinamically instable patients an emergency IVUS exam could integrate the angiography during endovascular treatment of rAAA to better detect needed information,1 but physicians, nurses, and technicians need to work through a learning curve in order to properly interpret the images generated and maximize the usefulness of the technology.

Hypothetically abdominal US through a friendlier learning curve could integrate the angiographic valuation to better define the outer diameter and the parietal features of the aortic neck, as the angiography does not reveal localization and extent of the thrombus and/or calcification.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera di Cosenza

References

  1. Nyman R, Eriksson M-O: Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 2008, 97: 110-115.Google Scholar
  2. Lederle FA, Simel DL: JAMA. 1999, 281: 77-82.Google Scholar
  3. Quill DS, et al: Surg Clin North Am. 1989, 69: 713-Google Scholar

Copyright

© Scarcello et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement