Volume 10 Supplement 1
Prevention and surgical treatment of lymphatic injuries in geriatric surgery
© Boccardo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Published: 19 May 2010
The rate of occurrence of post-operative complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy reported in Literature is of 6-40% for seromas or lymphocele, 2-4% for haematomas, 17-65% for wound dehiscence, 6-20% for wound infection and 22-80% for lymphoedema (1-3)
The problem of prevention of lymphatic injuries in geriatric surgery is extremely important if we think about the frequency of both early complications such as lymphorrhea, lymphocele, wound dehiscence and infections and late complications such as lymphangites and lymphedema. Nowadays, it is possible to identify patients at risk and prevent these lesions or treat them at an early stage. This study helps to demonstrate how important it is to integrate diagnostic and clinical findings in order to better understand how to properly identify patients at risk of lymphatic injuries and, therefore, when it is useful and proper to use prevention.
Material and methods
The authors’ experience includes 85 geriatric patients who underwent procedures to prevent and/or treat lymphatic injuries after trauma or surgery. The main causes of secondary lymphatic injuries are represented by surgical operations, irradiations, infections, traumas, metastatic lymphnodal involvement. The high risk surgical operations include: radical mastectomy, Wertheim-Meigs operation, oncologic operation in urology, abdominal surgery, lymphadenectomies in "critical sites" (groin and axilla). Other operations are represented by exeresis of lipomas in critical sites, saphenectomy, inguino-crural hernioplasty. Authors report their experiences in the prevention and treatment of lymphatic injuries after surgical operations and trauma in geriatrics. After an accurate diagnostic approach (also lymphoscintigraphy), prevention is based on different technical procedures among which microsurgical procedures. It is very important to follow-up the patient not only clinically but also by lymphoscintigraphy.
A protocol of prevention was identified of secondary limb lymphedema that included , from the diagnostic point of view, lymphoscintigraphy and, as concerns therapy, it also recognized the role of early microsurgery. It is necessary to accurately follow-up the patient who has undergone an operation at risk for the appearance of lymphatic complications especially in geriatric age and, even better, to assess clinically and by lymphoscintigraphy the patient before surgical operation.
- Roses DF, Brooks AD, Harris MN, Shapiro RL, Mitnick J: Complications of level I and II axillary dissection in the treatment of carcinoma of the breast. Annals of Surgery. 1999, 230 (2): 194-201. 10.1097/00000658-199908000-00009.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tonouchi H, Ohmori Y, Kobayashi M, Konishi N, Tanaka K, Mohri Y, Mizutani H, Kusunoki M: Operative morbidity associated with groin dissections. Surg Today. 2004, 34 (z): 413-8. 10.1007/s00595-003-2738-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boccardo F, Casabona F, De Cian F, Friedman D, Villa G, Bogliolo S, Ferrero S, Murelli F, Campisi C: Lymphedema microsurgical preventive healing approach: a new technique for primary prevention of arm lymphedema after mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009, 16 (3): 703-8. 10.1245/s10434-008-0270-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.