Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of methodological quality assessment using the JBI

From: Dyslipidemia is associated with sarcopenia of the elderly: a meta-analysis

Number

Research

①

②

③

④

⑤

⑥

⑦

⑧

⑨

⑩

Overall

1

Ana Coto Montes

2

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

1

17

2

Hanyi Zou

2

1

2

1

1

1

1

2

2

1

14

3

Hee-Sook Lim

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

1

17

4

Jiaojiao Li

1

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

2

17

5

Jun-Hyuk Lee

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

1

18

6

K Sanada

2

2

2

1

1

2

1

1

2

2

16

7

Lijuan Wang

2

1

2

1

2

2

1

1

1

2

15

8

Nan Wang

1

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

1

1

15

9

Peipei Han

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

18

10

Qifan Zhou

2

1

1

1

2

0

1

1

2

1

12

11

Rui Cheng

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

19

12

Ruirui Hao

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

15

13

S. J. Baek

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

2

2

2

18

14

Seong-Joon Park

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

19

15

Syed Shahid Habib

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

2

1

2

17

16

Xuelian Zhang

2

1

2

2

2

1

1

2

1

1

15

17

Yanping Du

1

2

2

2

2

1

1

2

1

1

15

18

Yourui Xu

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

2

1

2

17

19

Yu Wang

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

2

1

2

17

20

Yuan Zhang

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

1

2

2

17

  1. Evaluation criteria:① Is the research purpose clear? Is the basis for setting the question sufficient?②How was the study population selected (whether the study subjects were randomly selected, and whether stratified sampling was adopted to improve sample representativeness)?③Does clearly describe the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the sample?④Does clearly describe the sample features?⑤Does the tool for collecting data have reliability and validity (If using an investigator survey, how is the repeatability of the survey results)?⑥What are the measures to verify the authenticity of the information?⑦Does consider ethical issues?⑧Is the statistical method correct?⑨Are the statements of the research results appropriate and accurate? Are the results distinguished from the inference, and are the results faithful to the data rather than the inference?⑩Have you provided a clear explanation of the research value?
  2. 0 points: Not meeting the requirements; 1 point: mentioned but not described in detail; 2 points: Detailed, comprehensive, and accurate description
Back to article page

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us