Willingness and influencing factors of old-age care mode selection among middle-aged and older adults in Henan Province, China

Ren, Weicun; He, Ruibo; Tarimo, Clifford Silver; Sun, Lei; Wu, Jvxiao; Zhang, Liang

doi:10.1186/s12877-023-04559-w

Table 7 The mediating effect of personal perspectives on the effect of health status and external support on the evaluation of OCM^a selection

From: Willingness and influencing factors of old-age care mode selection among middle-aged and older adults in Henan Province, China

Affect way^d		β	SE	t	P	(LLCI, ULCI)	Total effect	Indirect effect	BootSE	(BootLLCI, BootULCI)	Effect category
M → × 1 → Y1	× 1 → M^b	0.014	0.008	1.837	0.067	(-0.001, 0.029)	0.067***	-	-	(-0.001, 0.001)	Indirect effect is not significant
	× 1 → Y1	0.001	0.023	0.056	0.955	(-0.044, 0.047)
	M → Y1^c	0.067	0.005	12.654	< 0.001	(0.057, 0.078)
M → × 2 → Y1	× 2 → M^b	0.012	0.006	1.856	0.064	(-0.001, 0.025)		-	-	(-0.001, 0.001)	Indirect effect is not significant
	× 2 → Y1	0.007	0.027	0.269	0.788	(-0.046, 0.061)
	M → Y1	0.067	0.005	12.641	< 0.001	(0.057, 0.078)
M → × 3 → Y1	× 3 → M^b	0.053	0.006	9.477	< 0.001	(0.042, 0.064)		0.012	0.003	(0.007, 0.017)	Mediation effect
	× 3 → Y1	0.226	0.031	7.335	< 0.001	(0.166, 0.287)
	M → Y1	0.055	0.005	10.247	< 0.001	(0.045, 0.066)
M → × 4 → Y1	× 4 → M^b	0.069	0.005	12.807	< 0.001	(0.058, 0.080)		0.013	0.003	(0.007, 0.018)	Mediation effect
	× 4 → Y1	0.178	0.032	5.543	< 0.001	(0.115, 0.241)
	M → Y1	0.054	0.006	9.695	< 0.001	(0.044, 0.066)
M → × 1 → Y2	× 1 → Y2	0.098	0.025	3.943	< 0.001	(0.049, 0.147)	0.070***	0.001	0.001	(0.001, 0.003)	Mediation effect
M → × 1 → Y2	M → Y2	0.069	0.006	12.022	< 0.001	(0.058, 0.080)		0.001	0.001	(0.001, 0.003)	Mediation effect
M → × 2 → Y2	× 2 → Y2	-0.109	0.029	-3.707	< 0.001	(-0.166, -0.051)		-0.001	0.001	(-0.003, -0.001)	Masking effect
M → × 2 → Y2	M → Y2	0.071	0.006	12.478	< 0.001	(0.060, 0.083)		-0.001	0.001	(-0.003, -0.001)	Masking effect
M → × 3 → Y2	× 3 → Y2	0.064	0.034	1.863	0.063	(-0.003, 0.132)		0.003	0.002	(-0.001, 0.008)	Mediation effect
M → × 3 → Y2	M → Y2	0.067	0.006	11.081	< 0.001	(0.055, 0.079)		0.003	0.002	(-0.001, 0.008)	Mediation effect
M → × 4 → Y2	× 4 → Y2	0.145	0.035	4.100	< 0.001	(0.075, 0.214)		0.010	0.003	(0.004, 0.016)	Mediation effect
M → × 4 → Y2	M → Y2	0.060	0.006	9.707	< 0.001	(0.048, 0.073)		0.010	0.003	(0.004, 0.016)	Mediation effect
M → × 1 → Y3	× 1 → Y3	0.073	0.027	2.705	0.007	(0.020, 0.126)	0.044***	0.001	0.001	(0.001, 0.003)	Mediation effect
M → × 1 → Y3	M → Y3	0.043	0.006	6.854	< 0.001	(0.030, 0.055)		0.001	0.001	(0.001, 0.003)	Mediation effect
M → × 2 → Y3	× 2 → Y3	-0.136	0.032	-4.317	< 0.001	(-0.198, -0.074)		-0.002	0.001	(-0.004, -0.001)	Masking effect
M → × 2 → Y3	M → Y3	0.046	0.006	7.328	< 0.001	(0.033, 0.057)		-0.002	0.001	(-0.004, -0.001)	Masking effect
M → × 3 → Y3	× 3 → Y3	0.039	0.037	1.049	0.295	(-0.034, 0.112)		0.002	0.002	(-0.003, 0.006)	Mediation effect Mediation effect
M → × 3 → Y3	M → Y3	0.042	0.007	6.370	< 0.001	(0.029, 0.054)		0.002	0.002	(-0.003, 0.006)	Mediation effect Mediation effect
M → × 4 → Y3	X4 → Y4	0.100	0.038	2.608	0.009	(0.025, 0.175)		0.007	0.003	(0.001, 0.013)	Mediation effect Mediation effect
M → × 4 → Y3	M → Y3	0.037	0.007	5.448	< 0.001	(0.023, 0.050)		0.007	0.003	(0.001, 0.013)	Mediation effect Mediation effect
M → × 1 → Y4	× 1 → Y4	0.076	0.029	2.688	0.008	(0.020, 0.132)	0.058***	0.001	0.001	(0.001, 0.003)	Mediation effect
M → × 1 → Y4	M → Y4	0.057	0.007	8.712	< 0.001	(0.044, 0.070)		0.001	0.001	(0.001, 0.003)	Mediation effect
M → × 2 → Y4	× 2 → Y4	-0.134	0.033	-4.016	< 0.001	(-0.200, 0.069)		-0.002	0.001	(-0.004, -0.001)	Masking effect
M → × 2 → Y4	M → Y4	0.060	0.007	9.165	< 0.001	(0.047, 0.073)		-0.002	0.001	(-0.004, -0.001)	Masking effect
M → × 3 → Y4	× 3 → Y4	0.023	0.039	0.590	0.556	(-0.054, 0.100)		0.001	0.002	(-0.003, 0.005)	Mediation effect Mediation effect
M → × 3 → Y4	M → Y4	0.057	0.007	8.272	< 0.001	(0.044, 0.071)		0.001	0.002	(-0.003, 0.005)	Mediation effect Mediation effect
M → × 4 → Y4	× 4 → Y4	0.148	0.040	3.682	< 0.001	(0.069, 0.227)		0.010	0.003	(0.004, 0.016)	Mediation effect
M → × 4 → Y4	M → Y4	0.048	0.007	6.769	< 0.001	(0.034, 0.062)		0.010	0.003	(0.004, 0.016)	Mediation effect

^aOCM Old-age care mode
^bx1 refers to the education level, × 2 refers to the number of children, × 3 refers to the relationship between family members, × 4 refers to the relationship with neighbors, Y1 refers to Home-based older adults care, Y2 refers to refers to Providing for the aged at home by communities, Y3 refers to the selection of Retirement village, Y4 refers to the selection of Nursing homes, and M refers to the individual’s perspectives on old-age; ^b: For different old-aged modes, the results of M → × 1, M → × 2, M → × 3, M → × 4 are all equal. In order to reduce the size of the table, only the values of these four relationships are listed in home-based older adult care
^cIndicates the direct effect
^dThe control variables in the analysis are age, marriage, and affordable expenses

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us

Submission enquiries: bmcgeriatrics@biomedcentral.com
General enquiries: ORSupport@springernature.com

BMC Geriatrics

Contact us