Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance comparison of each model on validation cohort

From: Development and validation of a machine learning-based fall-related injury risk prediction model using nationwide claims database in Korean community-dwelling older population

Models

No. (%) of high-risk patients

No. of FRIa

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

AUROC

p-valueb

Catboost

189,445 (34.3)

3543

0.652

0.647

0.652

0.019

0.995

0.700

 < 0.001

LightGBM

202,745 (36.7)

3679

0.636

0.662

0.636

0.018

0.994

0.700

0.004

XGBoost

193,956 (35.1)

3587

0.650

0.648

0.650

0.018

0.995

0.699

0.005

Random Forest

175,115 (31.2)

3383

0.660

0.637

0.660

0.019

0.994

0.699

0.380

Logistic regression

219,624 (39.7)

3839

0.603

0.691

0.602

0.017

0.995

0.698

-

  1. FRIs fall-related injury, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, AUROC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
  2. aCounted based on fall occurring within 3 months from the entry date. The total number of patients who experienced fall within 3 months was 5555
  3. bP-value for comparison of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with logistic regression