Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of hemodynamic index between the two groups (n = 30, \(\stackrel{-}{x}\pm s\))

From: Effect of acute normovolemic hemodilution on anesthetic effect, plasma concentration, and recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery

Item

Groups

T1

T2

T3

T6

T9

MAP(mmHg)

ANH group

87 ± 10

76 ± 9

84 ± 12

114 ± 20abc

109 ± 17abc

Control group

84 ± 5

90 ± 10*

91 ± 15

122 ± 10abc

114 ± 12abc

HR(bpm)

ANH group

69 ± 12

66 ± 9

63 ± 10

75 ± 21

79 ± 14b

Control group

63 ± 7

60 ± 7

59 ± 13

72 ± 15bc

77 ± 13abc

CO(L/min)

ANH group

4.5 ± 1.1

4.2 ± 1.4

5.0 ± 2.0

6.9 ± 2.2abc

6.7 ± 1.9abc

Control group

4.4 ± 1.8

4.6 ± 1.9

4.9 ± 2.3

6.0 ± 2.1a

6.3 ± 2.0ab

SVV(%)

ANH group

8.7 ± 1.6

11.7 ± 2.2

11.6 ± 4.5

7.9 ± 5.1b

8.7 ± 3.1

Control group

7.9 ± 2.7

6.7 ± 2.7*

7.5 ± 1.7*

3.9 ± 1.0*abc

6.0 ± 2.0*a

  1. Compared with ANH group, *P < 0.05; Compared with T1, aP < 0.05; Compared with T2, bP < 0.05; Compared with T3, cP < 0.05