Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview of GRADE results for group comparisons concerning intervention with walking

From: Review articles (Meta-Analyses) effects of walking on cognitive function in individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcomes

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Imprecision

Publication bias

SMD or MD

(95% CI)

Number of participants (Walking vs. Control)/Studies

Quality of the evidence (GRADE)

Global cognitive function

Sa

Ns

Sb

Ns

SMD = -0.09 (-0.40 to 0.23)

75

78

LOW

(Four studies)

Verbal learning

Ns

Ns

Ns

Ns

MD = -0.08 (-0.53 to 0.37)

105

103

HIGH

(Three studies)

Processing Speed

Ns

Ns

Sb

Ns

MD = 1.05 (-0.64 to 2.74)

85

81

MODERATE

(Two studies)

Walking endurance

Sa

Ns

Sb

Ns

MD = 23.70 (6.12 to 41.28)

76

73

LOW

(Three studies)

  1. (Ns) No serious; (S) Serious
  2. aDowngrading due to < 75% of the studies presented high quality
  3. bDowngrading due to sparse data with less than 200 participants per comparison