Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of frailty according to the physical performance scores in the sit-to stand motion test at baseline

From: Association between physical performance during sit-to-stand motion and frailty in older adults with cardiometabolic diseases: a cross-sectional, longitudinal study

Variables

Crude model

Multivariate model

Odds ratio (95% CI)

P

Odds ratio (95% CI)

P

Model for frailty defined based on the mCHS criteria

 Power score, per 0.1-point increase

0.35 (0.22–0.56)

 < 0.001

0.37 (0.22–0.63)

 < 0.001

 Speed score, per 1- point increase

0.61 (0.50–0.75)

 < 0.001

0.64 (0.52–0.79)

 < 0.001

 Balance score, per 1- point increase

0.96 (0.94–0.99)

0.004

0.97 (0.94–0.99)

0.014

 Total score, per 10-points increase

0.64 (0.50–0.82)

 < 0.001

0.65 (0.49–0.86)

0.003

Model for frailty defined based on the KCL criteria

 Power score, per 0.1-point increase

0.43 (0.30–0.63)

 < 0.001

0.40 (0.26–0.62)

 < 0.001

 Speed score, per 1-point increase

0.77 (0.67–0.90)

0.001

0.81 (0.69–0.96)

0.016

 Balance score, per 1-point increase

0.97 (0.95–0.99)

0.006

0.98 (0.96–1.00)

0.071

 Total score, per 10-points increase

0.66 (0.54–0.82)

 < 0.001

0.72 (0.56–0.91)

0.006

  1. Multivariate model is adjusted for age, sex, BMI, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, stroke, habitual drinker, and smoking
  2. CI confidence interval, KCL Kihon Checklist, mCHS modified version of the Cardiovascular Health Study, BMI body mass index