Scale | Reliability and validity | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
Chronic Disease Self-Management Study Measures | Cronbach’s α of each dimension: 0.72–0.91, test–retest reliability: 0.65–0.80 | Recognized, with good reliability and validity, applicable to all patients with chronic diseases | Not specific. The self-management assessment only involves exercise, cognitive symptom management, and communication with doctors; and the content of the assessment is not comprehensive |
Hypertension Patients of Self-Management Behavior Rating Scale | Cronbach’s α of each dimension: 0.757–0.911, Cronbach’s α of total scale: 0.914, Content Validity Index (CVI): 0.82–0.94, Overall scale CVI: 0.91 | Currently widely used in hypertension self-management | Assessment content is not comprehensive and the test–retest reliability of the scale has not been examined |
Hypertension Self-Management Scale | Cronbach’s alpha for total scale: 0.854, total halving: 0.856, Overall scale CVI: 0.976 | It involves the content of the risk factor dimension, management dimension is low | There is no theoretical basis for the development of the scale, and the reliability of the risk factor |
Hypertension Self-Profile | Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale: 0.950, test–retest reliability: 0.918, scale CVI: 0.83–1.00 | The scale has a clear theoretical. framework, and its content addresses motivational factors | The expression of items in the scale is too specialized, the evaluation of a total of 60 items is time-consuming, and it is mainly used to evaluate the self-care aspects of hypertensive patients |