Skip to main content
Download PDF

Examining the relationship between health literacy and quality of life: evidence from older people admitted to the hospital

BMC Geriatrics volume 23, Article number: 147 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Literacy has become an increasingly serious problem, especially as it relates to health care. In this regard, health literacy (HL), as a cognitive skill, has proven to be an influential factor to improve of the quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to examine the level of HL and its relationship with the QOL of older people at the time of discharge from the hospital in the south of Iran.

Methods

This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study included 300 older people admitted and treated in 10 teaching-therapeutic hospitals affiliated with the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2021. The standard Health Literacy for Iranian Adults (HELIA) questionnaire and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) were used to collect the required data. Data were analyzed with SPSS software version 23 software using descriptive and inferential statistics, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, T-test, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression at p = 0.05.

Results

The mean scores of Hl and QOL for older people were 48.22 ± 9.63 (out of 100) and 61.59 ± 12.43 (out of 120), respectively. Moreover, there was a significant direct correlation between the participants’ HL and their QOL (r=0.388, p<0.001). All dimensions of HL, including comprehension (β=0.461, p<0.001), decision-making and behavior (β=0.434, p<0.001), access (β=0.397, p<0.001), reading skill (β=0.362, p=0.002), and assessment (β=0.278, p=0.004), were significant relationship with QOL. A statistically significant difference was revealed between the mean scores of HL regarding the participants’ gender (p=0.04) and level of education (p=0.001). Furthermore, the mean scores of QOL were significantly different with regard to older people’s gender (p=0.02), marital status (p=0.03), level of education (p=0.002), and income (p=0.01).

Conclusion

The findings revealed the participants’ inadequate HL and average QOL. Considering the relationship of HL with QOL, it is recommended to develop comprehensive programs and effective interventions to develop HL skills and subsequently improve QOL among older people.

Peer Review reports

Background

Aging is a sensitive phase of human life, and attention to the problems and needs of this age group is of paramount importance [1]. This phase of life is always considered one of the main economic, social, and health challenges in all countries [2]. According to estimates in 2012, older people account for 0.8% of the world’s population. Meanwhile, in 2015, the proportion of older people population increased by 0.5% and reached 8.5% of the total population 2015. The frequency of older people is predicted to reach one billion or 0.12 of the total population by 2030. By 2050, older people are expected to cover 16.7% of the total world population and reach above two billion persons [3]. On the other hand, older people in most societies are more likely to experience decreased physical, mental, and cognitive abilities and consequently hospitalization in health service centers such as hospitals. Accordingly, they are more likely to depend on formal and informal support to maintain health, performance, and self-sufficiency [4]. In this regard, attention to self-care and responsibility of older people towards different diseases is one of the support solutions requiring high levels of HL [5].

HL refers to individuals’ ability to interpret and understand basic information required for making decisions in the field of health [6]. This literacy encompasses skills, including reading, listening, analysis, and decision-making, and the ability to apply these skills in health situations, which are not necessarily correlated with years of education or general reading ability [7]. According to the World Health Organization, HL is defined not only as an individual character but also as a key determinant of health at the population level [8], which is a critical component in making appropriate and correct health decisions [9]. The appropriate level of HL makes individuals obey the orders of the health and treatment staff, promotes the effectiveness of medical consultations and health promotion and self-care programs, and enhances individuals’ desire to participate in screening programs [10]. On the other hand, inadequate and low HL in older people is associated with factors such as reduced cognitive ability, decreased physical health, increased risk of dementia, and risk factors of chronic diseases in this age group [11,12,13]. Moreover, some studies have documented that low HL in older people is associated with increased depression [14], adoption of some high-risk health behaviors [15], and generally unfavorable physical and mental health [16]. Accordingly, older people must reach an acceptable level of HL to maintain and improve their health level [17].

Moreover, experts believe that individuals with acceptable HL usually enjoy better QOL [18]. QOL is considered one of the key components of general health [19] and one of the indicators reflecting the health status of older people [20]. According to the WHO, QOL refers to individuals’ assessment and comprehension of their life situation under the influence of the cultural and value system and the setting where they live. Individuals’ goals, expectations, standards, and desires significantly affect their physical and psychological condition, level of independence, social relationships, and beliefs [21, 22]. Compared to other age groups, older people experience a unique QOL due to conditions such as older age and special experiences and skills [23]. On the other hand, changes in the disease models, i.e., a decrease in the rate of infectious diseases and an increase in life expectancy and chronic diseases, have led to increased attention to the concepts of health and QOL among older people in recent decades [24]. The importance of QOL is so much that experts have introduced the focus of health care in the current century to be developing QOL [25]. Examining the level of HL and QOL in older people can provide comprehensive information about their health conditions to promote their literacy level and consequently reach acceptable QOL in this age group. To this end, the present study aimed to examine the level of HL and its relationship with the QOL of older people at the time of discharge from the hospital settings.

Hypothesis development

Physical impairment increases with age, and its negative effect on the ability to maintain independence increases the need for assistance, thereby decreasing QOL among older people [26]. In this regard, some studies have reported HL as one of the factors affecting QOL [27,28,29,30,31,32]. According to Wang et al. and Skevington et al., low HL is correlated with poor QOL, which can be caused by decreased accessibility and less use of medical care, poor self-management of the disease, reduced self-efficacy and ability to exercise control over life and surrounding environment, and increased stress aroused by daily life challenges [33, 34]. Yusefi et al. found a significant relationship between HL and QOL [11]. In their study, Panahi et al. reported a significant direct correlation between HL with the physical and mental dimensions of QOL and the overall QOL [35]. Kooshyar et al. also suggested that individuals with sufficient HL had a higher QOL and a significant relationship between HL and the physical and mental dimensions of QOL [28]. Zheng et al. [36], Couture et al. [29], and Wang et al. [33], also indicated that HL had an impact on QOL. Alnawajha claimed that QOL is the result of HL [37]. According to Hosieni et al., HL is the predictor of the QOL score [38]. Finally, Lee et al. state that HL in older people has a potential effect on promoting their health and QOL and decreases health care costs accordingly [39].

Moreover, some studies have revealed a significant relationship between HL and demographic variables such as gender [40,41,42] and level of education [40, 43,44,45,46]. Moreover, the relationship between QOL and variables such as gender [47,48,49,50], marital status [44, 50,51,52], level of education [52, 53], and income [48, 50] has also been documented in some other studies. According to the theoretical framework and various reviews of HL and QOL [11, 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39], the following research hypotheses were formulated:

  1. 1.

    The HL and its dimensions are positively related to older people’s QOL.

  2. 2.

    The mean scores of HL and QOL for older people were significantly different regarding demographic variables.

Methods

Design and setting

This descriptive-analytical study was cross-sectional which conducted in first-level teaching therapeutic hospitals (n=10) affiliated with the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in the south of Iran from July to November 2021.

Participants

Participants in the study were older people who received medical advice in the discharge room of hospitals at the time of discharge. Most of these elderly people were in the internal medicine department of hospitals due to diseases such as gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, diabetes, and kidney problems.

According to the following Eq. [54] and given the correlation between HL and QOL (r=0.201) based on a pilot study in Iran [55], at a confidence level of 95% and β=0.1, the sample size was estimated to be at least 259 persons. To increase accuracy and avoid bias caused by sample size drop, 300 persons were included in the study.

$$n = {\left[ {\left( {{Z_1} - \alpha {/_2} + {\rm{ }}{Z_{1 - \beta }}} \right){\rm{ }}/{\rm{ }}W} \right]^2} + {\rm{ }}3$$
(1)

In Eq. (1), W is calculated using the following equation:

$$W = \raise.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 1$}\kern-.1em/\kern-.15em\lower.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$} {\rm{ }}ln\left( {1 + r/1 - r} \right)$$
(2)

In Eq. 2, r is the estimated coefficient of correlation between responsiveness and service quality in a pilot study in Iran [55]. Questionnaires were submitted to the 300 participants in hospitals, proportional to the frequency of older people population in each of the studied hospitals. For this purpose, after visiting each hospital, the total frequency of older people (> 60 years) at the time of discharge in different wards was recorded. After calculating the total number of older people, the proportional sampling method was used to distribute 300 questionnaires. Older people were randomly selected in each hospital according to the number of older people in each ward. Inclusion criteria were informed consent, willingness to participate in the study, 60 years of age or older, the ability to speak and communicate. According to the WHO, 60 years of age or older is defined as the cutoff point of old age in developing countries [56]. Since cognitive disorders such as delirium and major and minor neurocognitive disorders affect individuals’ cognitive abilities (learning, memory, perception, and concentration) [57], older people with these disorders were excluded from the study. To this end, with the help of the supervisor and the doctor, the patient’s medical records were reviewed, and those with the aforementioned disorders were detected. Additionally, people who did not wish to continue cooperating were excluded.

Instruments

The data collection instrument was a three-section standard questionnaire. The first section of the questionnaire encompassed demographic information (including age, gender, marital status, level of education, and income), and the second and third sections contained the standard HELIA [58] and WHOQOL-BREF [59] questionnaires. The 33-item HELIA measures individuals’ ability in five subscales of health literacy, including reading skills (n=4), access (n=6), comprehension (n=7), assessment (n=4), and decision-making and behavior (n=12). The scale is scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The reading skill items are scored 5 (completely easy), 4 (easy), 3 (neither easy nor difficult), 2 (difficult), and 1 (completely difficult). For the other four subscales, the scoring scale contained 5 (always), 4 (often), 3 (sometimes), 2 (rarely), and 1 (never). To score the questionnaire, the raw scores in each subscale are obtained from the algebraic sum of the scores. Then, to convert this score into a range of zero to one hundred, the following formula is used: Adjusted score = (The raw score obtained-minimum possible score/maximum possible-minimum possible score). Finally, to obtain the total score, the scores of all dimensions (ranging from zero to one hundred) are added and divided by the number of dimensions (n=5). Then health literacy was categorized into four levels inadequate (0–50 points), not enough (50.1–66), adequate (66.1–84), and excellent (84.1–100) [11]. Montazeri et al.‘s confirmed the validity and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient=0.89) of this questionnaire [58].

The third section consisted of the standard WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire with 24 items in four domains: physical health (n=7 items), psychological health (n=6), social relations (n=3), and living environment (n=8). The items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 (very bad), 2 (bad), 3 (moderate), 4 (good), and 5 (very good). Older people’s QOL was also classified as follows: unfavorable (24–48), moderate (49–72), acceptable (73–96), and excellent (97–120). The validity and reliability of this questionnaire (with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient > 0.7) are confirmed in previous studies [59]. The validity and reliability of these two questionnaires are confirmed in previous studies [56, 59]. In the present study, the validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by 12 members of the academic staff and experts in the field of health and treatment management from the Iranian universities of medical sciences. Moreover, the calculated Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR) were 0.88 and 0.90 for the HELIA questionnaire and 0.87 and 0.89 for the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, respectively. Regarding their reliability, a sample of 30 older people was pre-tested, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.87 for the HELIA questionnaire and 0.79 for the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire; hence, the reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed.

Procedures and statistical analysis

To collect the required data, two researchers (PN and ERD) visited the hospitals on different weekdays in the morning, evening, and night shifts and distributed and collected questionnaires. To observe the ethical considerations, older people were voluntarily included in the study and filled out the questionnaires. After explaining the research objectives of the participants, they were ensured of the confidentiality of their information, and their verbal consent was obtained, and then the questionnaires were distributed in person among older people under study and collected on the same day. The questionnaire was completed by the participants. However, some older people asked the research team (PN and ERD) to help them complete the questionnaires. Then the collected data were imported to IBM SPSS software version 23. To investigate the correlation between older people’s HL and QOL and examine the correlation between these two variables and age, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used. A T-test was used to detect the difference in the mean score of the two main research variables regarding gender. The ANOVA test was used to investigate the difference between the mean scores of HL and QOL in older people regarding their marital status, level of education, and income level. Finally, multiple linear regression was used to investigate the simultaneous relationship of different aspects of HL with QOL in older people.

Results

The mean age of older people was 69.74 ± 5.23 years, with most of them (57.33%) being in the age group of 60–70 years. Moreover, 53.67% of the participants were females, and the others were males. Most of the respondents had elementary education (46%) and were married (85%) with an income of 10–20 million Rials (54.67%). Table 1 shows the frequency distribution of the participants’ demographic information.

Table 1 Frequency distribution of participants’ demographic information (n = 300)
Full size table

As presented in this table, the mean score of HL for older people was 48.22 ± 9.63 (out of 100), indicating inadequate HL. Among the HL dimensions, the maximum and minimum mean scores were obtained for access (50.19 ± 9.82 out of 100) and assessment (46.13 ± 9.32 out of 100). As presented in Table 2, the mean score of the participants’ QOL was 61.59 ± 12.43 out of 120, indicating their moderate QOL (Table 2).

Table 2 Mean and standard deviation of participants’ HL and QOL
Full size table

The findings revealed a positive and significant correlation between HL and its dimensions with QOL among older people (r=0.388, p<0.001). Among the HL dimensions, comprehension had the highest correlation with QOL (r=0.411, p<0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation between older people’ HL and QOL
Full size table

To determine the relationship of different HL dimensions with the QOL of older people, the results of the multiple linear regression analyses showed that the significant variables in the model determined using the Enter method were comprehension, decision-making and behavior, access, reading skill, and assessment, respectively. Moreover, the coefficient of determination in the processed model (R-Adjusted) of this test was 0.62, indicating that 62% of the variation in the QOL score can be explained by the variables in this model. According to the multiple linear regression analyses, the linear equation of the participants’ QOL was obtained as follows:

$$\begin{array}{l}Y = 1.813{\rm{ }} + {\rm{ }}0.461\,{x_1} + {\rm{ }}0.434\,{x_2}\\\,\,\, + {\rm{ }}0.397\,{x_3} + {\rm{ }}0.362\,{x_4} + {\rm{ }}0.278\,{x_5}\end{array}$$

Where, Y is the QOL score, and x represents different dimensions of HL in the studied population (Table 4).

Table 4 Multiple linear regression test results for variables affecting older people’s QOL
Full size table

The results showed significant differences among participants’ mean HL scores regarding gender (p=0.04) and level of education (p=0.001). In this regard, the mean HL scores of older people women (48.58 ± 9.74 out of 100) and those with bachelor’s degrees and higher education (49.48 ± 10.22 out of 100) were higher. Moreover, there were significant differences among the mean scores of older people’s QOL regarding their gender (p=0.02), marital status (p=0.03), level of education (p=0.002), and income (p=0.01). Accordingly, the mean QOL scores were higher for the females (62.55 ± 12.56 out of 120) than the males, for the married older people (64.97 ± 13.28 out of 120), for those with bachelor’s degrees and higher education (64.42 ± 13.16 out of 120), and for the participants with the income level above 30 million Rials per month (65.25 ± 13.48 out of 120) (Table 5).

Table 5 Relationship between HL and QOL regarding participants’ demographic information
Full size table

Discussion

The findings indicated the inadequate HL of older people. Consistent with this finding, Słońska et al. in Poland reported that most of older people aged 65 years and above had inadequate HL [60]. Moreover, in studies in different regions of Iran ( e.g., Kooshyar et al. [28], Ansari et al. [40], Borji et al. [43], Mohseni et al. [44], Reisi et al. [61]), most of older people’s HL level is reported to be inadequate. In comparison, Nezafati et al. [45] and TamizKar et al. [62] reported that more than half of older people had adequate HL. Similarly, Meier et al. in Switzerland found that 68.6% of older people had adequate HL [41]. According to Sørensen et al., HL adequacy in eight European countries ranged from 29 to 62% [63]. This inconsistency seems to be associated with the participants’ level of education in different studies. On the other hand, HL is a complicated construct, and several factors such as economic and social factors, cultural status, individual characteristics, and others may have effects on this construct. The results of the present study indicated the participants’ moderate QOL. Older people’s QOL has been reported differently in different studies. Similarly, Azadi et al. [47] and Moghadam et al. [64] reported moderate QOL for older people. According to a systematic review and meta-analysis, the QOL of the Iranian older people was almost moderate [65]. While Izadi et al. showed that the overall QOL of older people was at an acceptable level [66]. Miranda et al. in Brazil [67] and Rantakokko et al. in the United States [68] found out that most of older people had acceptable QOL. In addition to differences in the individual, social, economic, and cultural characteristics of the studied groups, the differences in the preparedness of different communities to face the challenges caused by aging can also be a reason for the inconsistencies in older people’s QOL in different societies.

The findings of the study revealed a statistically significant and positive correlation between older people’s HL and their QOL. Furthermore, the HL dimensions, including comprehension, decision-making and behavior, access, reading skills, and assessment, were significant relationship with QOL in older people. In Wang et al.’s study in China, high HL was significantly correlated with QOL in patients with high blood pressure [33]. Lee et al. showed that HL was one of the factors affecting health-related QOL in older people aged above 65 years in South Korea [39]. In the studies in Iran, there was a significant relationship between QOL and HL in older people [28, 69, 70]. Some studies have also documented that older people with a higher level of HL exhibit higher self-care behaviors and are healthier [46, 71,72,73]. Individuals with a higher level of HL may pay more attention to their health status and thus choose healthy behavioral habits, increasing their health-related QOL.

An investigation of the relationship between the main research variables and the participants’ demographic characteristics suggested that the participants’ mean HL scores were significantly different regarding their gender and level of education. Accordingly, older people women had higher HL than older people men. Moreover, with an increase in the level of education, older people’s HL increased as the HL of older people with a bachelor’s degree or higher education was higher than others. According to the results, the mean score of HL of the women was higher than that of men in Quaidi et al.’s study on patients aged above 40 years with type 2 diabetes [42]. In Ansari et al.’s study, the level of HL was higher in older people women [40]. Furthermore, Meier et al. showed that older people Swiss women’s HL was higher than that of men [41]. Perhaps, women’s search for more health-related content and more frequent visits to doctors and health centers to participate in screening programs and receive information from health workers are some reasons explaining their higher HL. Moreover, the role of women as the caretakers of other family members may encourage them to search for health-related information. Contrary to the results of the present study, older people men in some studies had higher HL [43, 74, 75]. The differences in individuals’ characteristics may be one of the reasons for inconsistencies in different studies.

In line with the results of this study, various studies have reported a significant relationship between HL and level of education; hence, the level of HL increases with an increase in individuals’ level of education [40, 41, 43,44,45,46, 74]. The elderlies with higher education have more ability to search for health-related content in virtual space and have more access to scientific information and texts. They can also establish effective communication with health care workers, and this has an effect on promoting their HL. In contrast to the aforementioned studies, Qaidi et al. provided different results in their study. In their study, the HL of all older people individuals with type 2 diabetes and a degree higher than a diploma was significantly lower than those with a diploma. The researchers concluded that a higher level of education does not guarantee higher HL [42]. Those with elementary education probably have more leisure time to search for health-related information from virtual social networks and receive information from mass communication media and have more opportunities to visit health centers for screening, care services, and information.

Finally, the mean score of older people’s QOL was significantly higher in older people women who were married and had a bachelor’s degree and higher education, with an income level above 30 million Rials. Accordingly, with an increase in older people’s level of education and income, their QOL increased.

In other studies in Iran (e.g., Azadi et al. [47], Rajabi et al. [48], Babak et al. [49], Raei et al. [50]), older people men’s mean QOL score was higher than older people women’s scores. Orfila et al. in Spain showed that older people women’s QOL scores were lower than that of men [76]. This contradicts the results of the present study. One of the reasons for older people men’s higher QOL scores in most studies may be the further financial independence of men than women. Moreover, in many cultures, after divorce or the death of a spouse, women have less chance of remarrying than men, and their isolation and loneliness may have a negative impact on their QOL. According to the results of the present study, the married older people had a higher QOL than older people who divorced from their spouses or whose spouses were not alive [44, 47, 48, 50,51,52]. One of the risks and problems of old age is loneliness and isolation; hence, attention to this issue and the provision of supportive and emotional conditions is one of the necessities of aging and affects the QOL of older people.

In line with the findings of this study, previous studies have claimed that the mean score of QOL increases with an increase in the level of literacy and education [47,48,49, 52, 53]. Given that higher education increases one’s competence in many fields, it can ultimately lead to higher QOL. The level of education not only is directly correlated with QOL by improving healthy behavior and lifestyle but also is indirectly by providing a better job, thereby making older people less vulnerable to economic and social problems and others. In line with the results of the present study, older people with higher incomes had a higher QOL [48, 50]. According to a review study in Iran, the results of studies on older people’s QOL revealed that this group is in a difficult situation due to the financial burden of the disease, and the researchers concluded that improving the economic situation can increase older people’s QOL [11]. Most elderlies may lose their source of income in old age and become economically dependent on others. On the other hand, medical expenses increase annually, and older people, especially those without additional insurance, are no longer able to pay medical costs. This implies that proper financial support is one of the factors affecting their QOL.

Conclusion

The findings indicated inadequate and moderate levels of HL and QOL in older people, and there was a positive and significant statistical relationship between these two variables. In other words, improving HL leads to the improvement of QOL among older people. Inadequate HL in older people is considered a warning for officials, policy-makers, and health service providers, highlighting the need to pay further attention to HL in health promotion programs. Given that older people population in Iran is increasing, attention to the problems and needs of this group is a necessity. Accordingly, it is necessary to develop appropriate interventions to improve the HL level of older people to provide the grounds for improving their health status and promoting their QOL.

Limitations

In this study, data collection was done by self-reporting, which may have an effect on the reporting of data by older people. Also, the use of a questionnaire and the inability to fully generalize the results to other societies and cultures are among the limitations of this study. Longitudinal studies in other regions with different cultures are highly recommended. As the study was conducted in Iran, it is recommended that similar studies be conducted in other countries so that a better understanding of the relationship between health literacy and quality of life can be obtained by comparing the results. However, despite the significant relationship between health literacy and quality of life in this study, there is a possibility that this relationship is influenced by a variety of factors, so future studies should explore the factors affecting the relationship between health literacy and quality of life.

Data Availability

Whilst identifying/confidential patient data should not be published within the manuscript, the datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CVI:

Content Validity Index

CVR:

Content Validity Ratio

HELIA:

Health Literacy for Iranian Adult

References

  1. Fita F, Mekonnen HS, Endalew HL, Azagew AW. Knowledge, attitude, and associated factors towards older people care among nurses working at public hospitals in West Shoa zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hosseininesar M, Zanjani H, Seyed Mirzaie SM, Kaldi A. Study of quality of life of the elders in Gilan and its effective factors. J Iran Social Dev Stud. 2018;10(1):75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rico-Blázquez M, Quesada-Cubo V, Polentinos-Castro E, Sánchez-Ruano R, Rayo-Gómez M, del Cura-González I. Health-related quality of life in caregivers of community-dwelling individuals with disabilities or chronic conditions. A gender-differentiated analysis in a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):1–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morovatisharifabad MA, Ghofranipour FA, Heydarnia AR, Babaeirochi GR. Perceived religious support of health promoting behavior and status doing these behaviors in aged 65 years and older in Yazd. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci. 2004;12(1):23–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fransen MP, Van Schaik TM, Twickler TB, Essink-Bot ML. Applicability of internationally available health literacy measures in the Netherlands. J health communication. 2011;16(sup3):134–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khammarnia M, Setoodezadeh F, Ansari-Moghadam A, Yusefi A, Eskandari M, et al. Relationship between health literacy of cancer patients and shared clinical decision-making in a Middle East country. Epidemiol Biostatistics Public Health. 2018;15(1):e12699.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Singh S, Acharya SD, Kamath A, Ullal SD, Urval RP. Health literacy status and understanding of the prescription instructions in diabetic patients. J Diabetes Res. 2018;2018(8):1–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baernholdt M, Hinton I, Yan G, Rose K, Mattos M. Factors associated with quality of life in older adults in the United States. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(3):527–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith KH, Nolan ME, Knehans AM. Aging and health literacy. J consumer health Internet. 2014;18(1):94–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Samerski S. Health literacy as a social practice: Social and empirical dimensions of knowledge on health and healthcare. Soc Sci Med. 2019;226:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yusefi A, Ebrahim Z, Bastani P, Najibi M, Radinmanesh M, Mehrtak M. Health literacy status and its relationship with quality of life among nurses in teaching hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Nurs midwifery Res. 2019;24(1):73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Costa VR, Costa P, Nakano EY, Apolinário D, Santana AN. Functional health literacy in hypertensive elders at primary health care. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2019;72:266–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaup AR, Simonsick EM, Harris TB, Satterfield S, Metti AL, Ayonayon HN, Rubin SM, Yaffe K. Older adults with limited literacy are at increased risk for likely dementia. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2014;69(7):900–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker DW, Wolf MS, Feinglass J, Thompson JA, Gazmararian JA, Huang J. Health literacy and mortality among elderly persons. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(14):1503–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolf MS, Gazmararian JA, Baker DW. Health literacy and health risk behaviors among older adults. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(1):19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heijmans M, Waverijn G, Rademakers J, van der Vaart R, Rijken M. Functional, communicative and critical health literacy of chronic disease patients and their importance for self-management. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(1):41–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kobayashi LC, Wardle J, Wolf MS, Von Wagner C. Aging and functional health literacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2016;71(3):445–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ehmann AT, Groene O, Rieger MA, Siegel A. The relationship between health literacy, quality of life, and subjective health: results of a cross-sectional study in a rural region in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1683.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Haraldstad K, Wahl A, Andenæs R, Andersen JR, Andersen MH, Beisland E, Borge CR, Engebretsen E, Eisemann M, Halvorsrud L, Hanssen TA. A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(10):2641–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheraghi P, Eskandari Z, Bozorgmehr S, Zanjari N, Cheraghi Z. Quality of life and its related factors among Elderly People. J Educ Community Health. 2019;6(3):145–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mokhatri-Hesari P, Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: review of reviews from 2008 to 2018. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pequeno NP, Cabral NL, Marchioni DM, Lima SC, Lyra CD. Quality of life assessment instruments for adults: a systematic review of population-based studies. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Banister D, Bowling A. Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension. Transp Policy. 2004;11(2):105–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lemos BD, Cunha AM, Cesarino CB, Martins MR. The impact of chronic pain on functionality and quality of life of the elderly. BrJP. 2019;2:237–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mahalakshmi P, Vanisree A. Quality of life measures in glioma patients with different grades: a preliminary study. Indian J Cancer. 2015;52(4):580–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Barry PP. An overview of special considerations in the evaluation and management of the geriatric patient. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(1):8–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tavasoli Z, Nava F. The relationship between health literacy and marital satisfaction and quality of life of married women aged 30 to 40 in Mashhad. J Health Lit. 2017;2(1):31–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kooshyar H, Shoorvazi M, Dalir Z, Hosseini M. Health literacy and its relationship with medical adherence and health-related quality of life in diabetic community-residing elderly. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2014;23(1):134–43.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Couture ÉM, Chouinard MC, Fortin M, Hudon C. The relationship between health literacy and quality of life among frequent users of health care services: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Naimi AJ, Naderiravesh N, Bayat ZS, Shakeri N, Matbouei M. Correlation between health literacy and health-related quality of life in patients with hypertension, in Tehran, Iran, 2015–2016. Electron Physician. 2017;9(11):5712.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang C, Kane RL, Xu D, Meng Q. Health literacy as a moderator of health-related quality of life responses to chronic disease among chinese rural women. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Panagioti M, Skevington SM, Hann M, Howells K, Blakemore A, Reeves D, Bower P. Effect of health literacy on the quality of life of older patients with long-term conditions: a large cohort study in UK general practice. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1257–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang C, Lang J, Xuan L, Li X, Zhang L. The effect of health literacy and self-management efficacy on the health-related quality of life of hypertensive patients in a western rural area of China: a cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(2):299–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Panahi R, Osmani F, Sahraei M, Ebrahimi S, Nehadghashti MS, Javanmardi E. Relationship of health literacy and quality of life in adults residing in Karaj, Iran. J Educ Community Health. 2018;4(4):13–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zheng M, Jin H, Shi N, Duan C, Wang D, Yu X, et al. The relationship between health literacy and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alnawajhai S. Quality of Life as a Result of Health Literacy among Patients with Non-Communicable Diseases in Saudi Arabia.Iris J of Nur & Car.1 (1): 2018. IJNC. MS. ID.;505.

  38. Hosieni F, Mirzaei T, Ravari A, Akbary A. The relationship between health literacy and quality of life in retirement of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. J Health Lit. 2016;1(2):92–9.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lee MK, Oh J. Health-related quality of life in older adults: its association with health literacy, self-efficacy, social support, and health-promoting behavior. InHealthcare. 2020;8(4):407. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ansari H, Almasi Z, Ansari-Moghaddam A, Mohammadi M, Peyvand M, Hajmohammadi M, Bagheri F. Health literacy in older adults and its related factors: a cross-sectional study in Southeast Iran. Health Scope. 2016;5(4):e37453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Meier C, Vilpert S, Borrat-Besson C, Jox RJ, Maurer J. Health literacy among older adults in Switzerland: cross-sectional evidence from a nationally representative population-based observational study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2022;152:w30158. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2022.w30158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ghaedi M, Banihashemi F, Latifi M, Soleymani NM. The relationship between health literacy and self-care among patients with type 2 diabetes residing in the city of Bastak. Iran J Endocrinol Metabolism (IJEM). 2016;18(2):90–6.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Borji M, Tarjoman A, Otaghi M, Salimi E, Naseri A. Health literacy level and its related factors among the elderlies in Ilam in 2015. Iran J Nurs. 2017;30(108):33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mohseni M, Khanjani N, Iranpour A, Tabe R, Borhaninejad VR. The relationship between health literacy and health status among elderly people in Kerman. Iran J Ageing. 2015;10(2):146–55.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nezafati A, Mokhtari Lake N, Sheikholeslami F, Kazemnezhad Leili E. Health literacy and its related factors among the elderly in Rasht city, Iran. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2020;30(3):129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rahaei Z, Mehrjoyan N, Barzegr F, Anbari-Nogyni Z. Is higher health literacy Associated with Better Self-Care in the Elderly? J Health Lit. 2020;5(3):26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Azadi A, Taghineghad H, Azizi M, Mahmodi Y, Jamalaldin H. Scrutiny the quality of life elderly in Ilam and its related factors in 2015. Sci J Nurs Midwifery Paramed Fac. 2016;2:29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rajabi M, Jahanshiri S, Movahhed BK, Qashqaei AM, Bahrami A. Quality of life in and its correlates in elderly in Tehran. Iran Payesh (Health Monitor). 2017;16(4):531–41.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Babak A, Davari S, Aghdak P, Pirhaji O, Jahangiri P. Quality of life among the elderly under the protection of health and treatment centers in Isfahan Province, Iran, and its relationship with depression and body mass index. J Isfahan Med School. 2016;34(393):885–92.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Raei M, Rohani H, Yaghubi N, Eidy F, Sadeghi A. The Survey of Association between General Health and Quality of Life in Esfarayen Elderly People 2017. J Military Health Promotion. 2020;1(1):50–6.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lee TW, Ko IS, Lee KJ. Health promotion behaviors and quality of life among community-dwelling elderly in Korea: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(3):293–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Abbasabad Arabi H, Bastani F, Navab E, Haghani H. Investigating quality of life and its relationship with Emotional Intelligence (EQ) in Elderly with Diabetes. IJPCP. 2015;21(3):215–24.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kazemi N, Sajjadi H, Bahrami G. Quality of life in iranian Elderly. Salmand: Iran J Ageing. 2019;13(5):518–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Negida A. Sample size calculation guide-part 7: how to calculate the sample size based on a correlation. Front Emerg Med. 2020;4(2):e34.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Khaleghi M, Amin Shokravi F, Peyman N. The relationship between health literacy and health-related quality of life in students. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2019;7(1):66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Higo M, Khan HT. Global population aging: unequal distribution of risks in later life between developed and developing countries. Global Social Policy. 2015;15(2):146–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Monk TG, Price CC. Postoperative cognitive disorders. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011;17(4):376–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Montazeri AL, Tavousi M, Rakhshani F, Azin SA, Jahangiri K, Ebadi M, Naderimagham S, Solimanian A, Sarbandi F, Motamedi A, Sistani MM. Health literacy for iranian adults (HELIA): development and psychometric properties. Payesh (Health Monitor). 2014;13(5):589–99.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wołowicka L, Jaracz K. Jakość Życia w Naukach Medycznych. Wydawnictwo Akademii Medycznej; Poznań, Poland: 2001. Polska wersja WHOQOL-WHOQOL 100 i WHOQOL BREF; pp. 259–281.

  60. Słońska ZA, Borowiec AA, Aranowska AE. Health literacy and health among the elderly: status and challenges in the context of the polish population aging process. Anthropol Rev. 2015;78(3):297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Reisi M, Javadzade SH, Mostafavi F, Sharifirad G, Radjati F, Hasanzade A. Relationship between health literacy, health status, and healthy behaviors among older adults in Isfahan, Iran. J Educ health promotion. 2012;1(1):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. TamizKar PMM, Fathnezha-kazemi A, Marami S. The relationship between health literacy level and self-care ability in the elderly. J Geronatology. 2019;4(9):54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sørensen K, Pelikan JM, Röthlin F, Ganahl K, Slonska Z, Doyle G, Fullam J, Kondilis B, Agrafiotis D, Uiters E, Falcon M. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the european health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur J Pub Health. 2015;25(6):1053–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Moghadam K, Mansour-Ghanaei R, Esmaeilpour-Bandboni M, Atrkar-Roshan Z. Investigating the relationship between social support and quality of life in the elderly. J Educ health promotion. 2020;9:215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Farajzadeh M, Gheshlagh RG, Sayehmiri K. Health related quality of life in iranian elderly citizens: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J community based Nurs midwifery. 2017;5(2):100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Izadi S, Khamehvar A, Aram SS, Yazdanpanah Nozari A. Social support and quality of life of elderly people admitted to rehabilitation centers. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2013;23(105):101–9.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Miranda LC, Soares SM, Silva PA. Quality of life and associated factors in elderly people at a Reference Center. Ciencia & saude coletiva. 2016;21:3533–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Rantakokko M, Portegijs E, Viljanen A, Iwarsson S, Rantanen T. Life-space mobility and quality of life in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(10):1830–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Majidi S, Kaveh Maryan S, Esmaeilpour_Bandboni M. The relationship between health literacy and quality of life of the Elderly living in nursing Homes in Guilan Province in 2020. JNE. 2021;10(5):78–85.

  70. Esmaili Shad B, Ghasemi M, Mortazavi Kiasari F. The relationship between health literacy and quality of life with the mediating role of social adjustment in the elderly. J Excellence Couns Psychother. 2019;8(31):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Mansouri F, Darvishpour A, Mansour- ghanaei R. The relationship between health literacy and self-care behaviors in the Elderly with Hypertension admitted to Cardiac Intensive Care units: a Correlational Study. jccnursing. 2022;15(1):34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mokhtari N, Nezafati A, Sheikholeslami F, Kazemnejad Leili E. Survey of the relationship between health literacy level and Health Sstatus among Elderly People referring to Retirement Centers in Rasht city. J Res Dev Nurs Midw. 2019;16(1):69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ngoh LN. Health literacy: a barrier to pharmacist–patient communication and medication adherence. J Am Pharmacists Association. 2009;49(5):e132–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Goli Roshan A, Hosseinkhani SN, Norouzadeh R. The relationship between health literacy of Elderly Diabetics and Adherence to Treatment, Babol, Iran, 2021. Qom Univ Med Sci J. 2021;14(12):70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Mohamadlo A, Batooli Z, Ramezankhani A. The analysis and review of the literatures in the field of health literacy. JMIS. 2020;6(2):58–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Orfila F, Ferrer M, Lamarca R, Tebe C, Domingo-Salvany A, Alonso J. Gender differences in health-related quality of life among the elderly: the role of objective functional capacity and chronic conditions. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(9):2367–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is approved by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences with the ID of 98-01-68-19897. The researchers would like gracefully to thank all the hospital managers and older people who participated in the study.

Funding

There was no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nottingham Business School, Nottingham, UK

    Gholamhossein Mehralian

  2. Department of Public Health, School of Health, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran

    Ali Reza Yusefi

  3. Health in Disasters and Emergencies Research Center, Institute for Future Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

    Esmat Rezabeigi Davarani

  4. Department of Midwifery, Nursing and Midwifery School, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran

    Sudabeh Ahmadidarrehsima

  5. Healthcare Services Management, School of Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Parnian Nikmanesh

  6. School of Health, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran

    Ali Reza Yusefi

Authors
  1. Gholamhossein Mehralian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Reza Yusefi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Esmat Rezabeigi Davarani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sudabeh Ahmadidarrehsima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Parnian Nikmanesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ARY designed the study and prepared the initial draft. ERD, SA, and PN contributed to data collection and data analysis. GM have supervised the whole study and finalized the article. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Reza Yusefi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is approved by the ethical committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences with the number of IR.SUMS.REC.1398.633. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or their legal guardian(s). All the methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehralian, G., Yusefi, A.R., Davarani, E.R. et al. Examining the relationship between health literacy and quality of life: evidence from older people admitted to the hospital. BMC Geriatr 23, 147 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03838-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03838-w

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us